判决
事实证明，宏碁 Swift 16 AI 是执行日常任务的强大伴侣。在英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 的加持下，性能较上一代机型大幅提升。这款笔记本电脑凭借高效的散热系统和可持续浏览网页超过 16 小时的电池而脱颖而出。
虽然超大的触觉触摸板令人印象深刻，但其巨大的尺寸有时会影响打字的舒适度。网络摄像头和扬声器的表现一般，但宏碁最终还是为强大的用户提供了一款非常酷且经久耐用的设备。
Pros
+ 豹湖美景
+ 令人惊叹的精美外观
+ 卓越的 OLED 显示屏
+ 现代 Wi-Fi 7
+ 超过 16 小时的续航时间
+ 环保包装
Cons
- 微型网络摄像头和自动投影仪
- 触摸板设计符合人体工学
- 强大的维护功能
- 网络连接速度低于笔记本电脑
定价和可用性
售价约为 1600 欧元。根据地区的不同，具体配置可能会有所差异，一些地方市场会提供配备不同内存甚至更快的酷睿 Ultra X9 处理器的版本。
规格
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (Swift 16 AI Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H 16c/16t, 4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core, 8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core, 4 x 3.3 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Panther Lake
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB
, LPDDR5 SDRAM
Display
16.00 inch, 2880 x 1800 pixel, 10-Point-Multitouch, ATNA60CL11, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Panther Lake-H PCH
Storage
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, 1024 GB
Weight
1.4 kg, Power Supply: 473 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
外壳和连接
金属和玻璃打造的机身给人一种高品质、坚固耐用的感觉。宏碁这次采用了圆角设计，避免了以往的尖锐美感。机身依然坚固、静音。一个与众不同的细节是，端口标签隐藏在底部。对于如此纤薄的设备来说，连接功能非常强大，配备了两个 Thunderbolt 端口、USB-A 和一个 microSD 插槽。配备了现代 Wi-Fi 7。屏幕可 180 度打开，使用笔时非常方便。包装非常环保，只使用了少量塑料。
ⓘ Notebookcheck|Marc Herter
ⓘ Notebookcheck|Marc Herter
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22.2 - 531, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX Intel® Killer™ Wi-Fi 7 BE1775s; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.20: Ø2373 (2355-2380)
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1619 (1525-1692)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1253 (978-1368)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX Intel® Killer™ Wi-Fi 7 BE1775s; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.20: Ø2361 (2278-2383)
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1734 (1715-1747)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1735 (1547-1825)
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø860 (459-1008)
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø851 (701-916)
22.8 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
输入设备
巨大的 17 x 11 厘米触摸板占据了整个桌面。它可与精密笔配合使用，并提供令人满意的点击感，不过它的宽度意味着在长时间打字时手的休息空间较小。键盘本身舒适且带背光，包括一个用于快速访问人工智能的 Copilot 按钮。
显示屏
OLED 屏幕清晰流畅，2880 x 1800 像素，120 Hz。色彩立即呈现出绝佳的效果，光亮的表面增加了冲击力，但也会反光。48 和 120 Hz 之间的自适应刷新率使其比其他快速 OLED 面板更高效。开箱即用的色彩准确度已经非常出色，DeltaE2000 值低于 2。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ATNA60CL11 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 405 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 401.9 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 400 cd/m²
Contrast: 30769:1 (Black: 0.013 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.61 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
calibrated: 1.34
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.25 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
93.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.89% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.265
CCT: 6581 K
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX ATNA60CL11, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 160WV1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 ATNA40KW05-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA NB140B9M-T01, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 144 Hz | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Samsung ATNA40LE01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V SDC41B6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -1% | -2% | -4% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.89 | 99.5 0% | 100 0% | 99.5 0% | 96.2 -4% | 99.9 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 93.4 | 96.5 3% | 91.8 -2% | 88.7 -5% | 86.7 -7% | 94.6 1% |
| Response Times | 81% | 74% | 69% | 85% | 16% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 4.6 ? | 0.65 ? 86% | 1.87 ? 59% | 0.26 ? 94% | 0.71 ? 85% | 4.8 ? -4% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 18 ? | 0.87 ? 95% | 1.53 ? 91% | 0.4 ? 98% | 0.94 ? 95% | 18 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 481 | 240.2 ? | 480 ? | 720 ? | 968.8 ? | 481 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 82 | 31 62% | 22 73% | 70 15% | 20 76% | 39 52% |
| Screen | -21% | 6% | 3% | 36% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 400 | 395.4 -1% | 292 -27% | 497 24% | 600.5 50% | 425 6% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 402 | 392 -2% | 292 -27% | 495 23% | 612 52% | 421 5% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 99 | 95 -4% | 98 -1% | 96 -3% | 96 -3% | 98 -1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.013 | 0.01 23% | 0.0219 -68% | |||
| Contrast (:1) | 30769 | 29200 -5% | 19406 -37% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.61 | 3.69 -129% | 1.4 13% | 1.6 1% | 1.18 27% | 1.73 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.52 | 7.94 -76% | 2.2 51% | 4.5 -0% | 3.4 25% | 3.82 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.34 | 0.68 49% | 1.5 -12% | 0.73 46% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.25 | 1.9 16% | 1.7 24% | 2.5 -11% | 1 56% | 0.09 96% |
| Gamma | 2.265 97% | 2.28 96% | 2.12 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.346 94% |
| CCT | 6581 99% | 6274 104% | 6510 100% | 6567 99% | 6567 99% | 6432 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 20% /
8% | 26% /
19% | 23% /
17% | 39% /
38% | 6% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
光面处理让色彩显得鲜艳，但在强光下反光相当明显。标准亮度达到约 400 cd/m²，HDR 峰值超过 600 cd/m²。虽然极快的响应时间是 OLED 的明显优势，但该屏幕使用 PWM 进行亮度控制，频率为 481 Hz。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 481 Hz Amplitude: 82 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 481 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 481 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7864 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
Swift 16 采用英特尔新一代豹湖处理器 Core Ultra X7 358H。这款处理器是一次重大飞跃，性能比上一代机型的 Ultra 9 提升了近 40%。32 GB LPDDR5 内存和快速 Western Digital NVMe SSD 支持系统整体速度，读取速度超过 6300 MB/s。图形由基于全新 Xe3 架构的集成英特尔 Arc B390 iGPU 处理，为休闲游戏和日常创意任务提供了足够的动力。此外，还搭载了一个具有 50 TOPS 的专用 NPU，用于本地 AI 处理，使该设备成为一款经过认证的 Copilot+ PC。
测试条件
Swift 16 AI 采用性能模式进行测试，使 CPU 的 TDP 稳定在 60 瓦左右。其他设置包括静音模式（平均 20 瓦）和普通模式（从 50 瓦开始，然后降至 30 瓦）。使用 Fn+F 组合键可在这些功耗配置文件之间进行切换。
处理器
集成的英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 是全新一代 Panther Lake 芯片的一部分，也是这款笔记本电脑的亮点。由于英特尔继续摒弃多线程技术，Panther Lake 芯片可提供 16 个内核和 16 个线程。
Cinebench R15 多重测试
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: Ø2947 (2891.84-3062.55)
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: Ø2543 (2491.75-2985.52)
MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: Ø2083 (1828.99-3089.52)
Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Intel Core Ultra X9 388H: Ø2951 (2897.71-3198.21)
Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: Ø2886 (2802.49-3038.82)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V: Ø1497 (1473.84-1582.72)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (13187 - 19841, n=9) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 33362, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2050 - 2087, n=8) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2459, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (6848 - 7749, n=7) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 12912, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (780 - 792, n=7) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2937 - 3135, n=7) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (292 - 312, n=7) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (184.8 - 326, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (171 - 218, n=7) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (58746 - 68533, n=7) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (6163 - 6526, n=7) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (15698 - 17121, n=8) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 29415, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2836 - 2927, n=8) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 4335, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (16094 - 17028, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 20422, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2079 - 2142, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (805 - 2974, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (19.5 - 23.1, n=7) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 36.1, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (44.8 - 56.9, n=7) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (0.4127 - 0.4311, n=8) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V -1! | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA -1! | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2214 - 50388, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (12221 - 17932, n=7) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12867 - 201874, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (29930 - 95525, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (3910 - 4911, n=7) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (653 - 8623, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (4735 - 7038, n=7) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6395 - 105740, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (14716 - 50734, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13243 - 126790, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (5127 - 67510, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (932 - 1179, n=7) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.2 - 2022, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1014 - 26875, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (6506 - 9447, n=7) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (30538 - 88154, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 88154, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (4261 - 4475, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1570 - 4689, n=13, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (8834 - 9880, n=8) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 10386, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (10282 - 11263, n=7) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 11664, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (13908 - 16780, n=7) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7323 - 18233, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (13082 - 13893, n=7) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 16240, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1884 - 2114, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2728, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1678 - 1898, n=7) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2489, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (2241 - 2529, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 3465, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1560 - 1707, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2024, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 596, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (293 - 338, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (278 - 305, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 402, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (445 - 460, n=7) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9293 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (102745 - 132135, n=6) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 132135, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (97755 - 118888, n=7) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (19699 - 174586, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (105984 - 134998, n=7) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17733 - 134998, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 535, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (84.6 - 101.9, n=7) | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00
Sequential Read:
4887MB/s
Sequential Write:
2538MB/s
4K Read:
63.9MB/s
4K Write:
164.8MB/s
4K-64 Read:
807MB/s
4K-64 Write:
2595MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.123ms
Access Time Write:
0.024ms
Score Read:
1359Points
Score Write:
3014Points
Score Total:
4968Points
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6359 (5619.32-6377.27)
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7017 (6000.16-7049.37)
MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6898 (4528.59-6952)
Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Samsung PM9C1b MZVL82T0HBL1; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5775 (4982.41-5987.37)
Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø9636 (5843.77-14090.55)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5908 (4197.02-6315.36)
图形处理器性能
由于没有专用图形芯片，采用 Xe3 架构的 Intel Arc B390 iGPU 可满足所有图形需求。这一集成解决方案在游戏和 GPU 加速应用中均表现出色。它能以中高设置流畅运行当前的游戏。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18576 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 225072 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 48108 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13950 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7209 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1573 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 5821 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 177.6 | 171.2 | 103.7 | 40.9 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 119.8 | 99 | 112.3 | 100.5 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 134.8 | 72.6 | 52.3 | 38.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 61.1 | 45 | 41.4 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 356 | 119.4 | 99.6 | 89.7 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.4 | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 65.3 | 49.3 | 43.2 | 35.6 | 14.3 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 134.8 | 111.7 | 86.4 |
排放与功耗
尽管性能很高，但 Swift 16 的散热效果却非常出色。虽然风扇在负载情况下会发出声音，但冷却系统非常高效。双风扇设置通过键盘吸入空气，即使在压力下也能将表面温度保持在 32 °C左右。扬声器缺乏深度，最适合偶尔播放媒体文件。能源管理非常出色，70 瓦时电池在 Wi-Fi 测试中可持续使用 16 小时以上。在满负荷情况下，系统功耗超过 100 瓦。小巧的 100 瓦电源适配器比笔记本电脑本身热得多，显示出电子设备的高负荷。
设备维护
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.4 / 26.1 / 26.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| / 48.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.4 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 2% | 4% | 10% | 3% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.4 | 23.3 8% | 25.4 -0% | 25 2% | 22.9 10% | 25.8 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.4 | 23.4 8% | 25.4 -0% | 25 2% | 23.4 8% | 25.8 -2% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 26.1 | 23.4 10% | 25.4 3% | 25 4% | 23.4 10% | 25.8 1% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26.4 | 25.8 2% | 25.4 4% | 25 5% | 23.4 11% | 26.7 -1% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 48.1 | 38.1 21% | 46.5 3% | 45.9 5% | 42.8 11% | 44.4 8% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 48.4 | 48.6 -0% | 46.5 4% | 45.9 5% | 45.2 7% | 41.1 15% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 38 | 33.1 | 36.4 | 28.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22 °C / 71.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+6.7 °C / 12.1 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22 °C / 71.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+6.7 °C / 12.1 F).
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -13% | -6% | -3% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 32 | 40.6 -27% | 47.1 -47% | 35.3 -10% | 38.6 -21% | 37.9 -18% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 37 | 39.8 -8% | 46.2 -25% | 44.3 -20% | 38.4 -4% | 31.5 15% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27 | 23.2 14% | 24.3 10% | 25.5 6% | 24.6 9% | 28.3 -5% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 27 | 23.8 12% | 24.5 9% | 26.7 1% | 26 4% | 29.7 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle | 5.12 / 7.14 / 13 Watt |
| Load |
/ 107 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, , OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL82T0HBL1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | 38% | -1% | 35% | 19% | 24% | -13% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.12 | 4 22% | 2.8 45% | 4.8 6% | 3.5 32% | 5.7 -11% | 3.82 ? 25% | 5.7 ? -11% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.14 | 4.4 38% | 4.2 41% | 9.8 -37% | 4 44% | 7.4 -4% | 5.66 ? 21% | 10.1 ? -41% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 13 | 10.2 22% | 4.5 65% | 10.2 22% | 5.3 59% | 7.9 39% | 8.93 ? 31% | 12.5 ? 4% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 73.1 | 62.6 14% | 59.9 18% | 76.3 -4% | 61.3 16% | 49.8 32% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 73.1 | 62.4 15% | 58.6 20% | 75.3 -3% | 61.4 16% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 107 | 94.6 12% | 64 40% | 96 10% | 63.4 41% | 65.41 39% | 85.6 ? 20% | 112.3 ? -5% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 44.2 | 48.9 | 47.3 | 43.7 | 44.9 ? | 64.8 ? |
* ... smaller is better
赛博朋克能量/压力测试
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø79 (68.5-107)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.86 (6.36-12.6)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø73.1 (67.7-81)
外部显示器功耗
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø88.9 (84.5-99.6)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø88.1 (84.6-94.4)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø56.4 (52.7-69.2)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.76 (4.34-8.01)
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø73.1 (67.7-81)
电池寿命
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 81 Wh | Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 99 Wh | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -37% | 20% | 4% | -1% | -19% | -26% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 16.3 | 10.3 -37% | 19.6 20% | 17 4% | 16.1 -1% | 13.2 -19% | 12 ? -26% |
| H.264 (h) | 21.4 | 16.3 ? | |||||
| Load (h) | 2.3 | 1.672 ? |
笔记本检查评级
宏碁 Swift 16 AI 是一款非常酷炫且经久耐用的主力机型，它能有效地实现 Panther Lake 架构带来的巨大性能提升。它的超大触摸板仍然是关注的焦点，有利也有弊。
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX
- 05/01/2026 v8
Marc Herter
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可供选择的对比方案
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.4%  | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,089.00 acer Swift 16 AI Laptop 2025... 2. $1,049.00 Acer Swift 16 AI Laptop 16" ... 3. acer Swift 16 AI PC Laptop |... | 1.4 kg | 16.25 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 OLED |
2. 87.2%  | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $2,699.99 Dell XPS 16 9640 Laptop | In... 2. $1,389.00 Dell 16 Plus Laptop 16" WUXG... 3. $2,999.00 Dell Premium 16 (Previously ... List Price: 2350 USD | 1.7 kg | 14.62 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
3. 84.2%  | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,370.61 MSI Prestige 14 AI+ EVO PRE1... 2. $1,247.39 msi Prestige A16 AI+ (2025) ... 3. $2,273.22 MSI Prestige 14 AI Studio C1... List Price: 1549€ | 1.4 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
4. 88.5%  | Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Intel Core Ultra X9 388H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,472.71 ASUS Zenbook Duo Laptop (202... 2. $1,642.79 ASUS Zenbook Duo Laptop, Dua... 3. $2,809.99 Asus Zenbook Duo AI Powered ... List Price: 2599€ | 1.7 kg | 23.4 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
5. 87.6%  | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: | 1.1 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
6. 85.3%  | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: | 1.5 kg | 15.95 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
