结论——几乎在各个方面都表现出色
当 初代 OmniBook Ultra 14 于2024年发布以取代Spectre系列时,我们对其性能和品质给予了高度评价,但对其60Hz IPS显示屏和相对较大的机身尺寸提出了批评。到了2026年,该机型经过全面重新设计,所有配置均采用120Hz OLED屏幕,外观也明显更加纤薄,旨在与 戴尔XPS 14 或 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra等竞品。惠普此次几乎全面革新,在刚性与品质上的提升足以媲美旗舰级EliteBook机型,可谓大获成功。
尽管如此,仍有某些方面值得改进。最值得注意的是,重新设计的键盘似乎有些多余,因为现有 EliteBook 和 OmniBook 机型的键盘本就表现出色,或者至少令人十分满意。 新款OmniBook在键程、回弹感和敲击声等特性上并未明显提升,因此这种打字体验的改变令人质疑。
性能方面,Core Ultra X9处理器虽然能效很高,但在惠普这款机型上的表现却不尽如人意,因为搭载Core Ultra X7的竞品机型运行速度更快。 遗憾的是,厂商并未提供搭载 Core Ultra X7 的配置选项,若采用该配置本可在不影响性能的前提下降低售价。尽管存在上述几处不足,但若您能接受约 2500 美元的高昂售价,2026 款 OmniBook Ultra 14 依然是惠普最出色的超便携笔记本之一。 此外,对于那些想要新设计和显示屏,但不需要性能强劲的Arc B390集成显卡的用户,可以选择配置较低的Core Ultra 7版本,价格几乎只有一半。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
惠普现已开始发售搭载Core Ultra X9处理器的OmniBook Ultra 14(即评测机型),售价为2800美元。此外,还有一款搭载Core Ultra 7处理器的低配版本,售价在1300至1800美元之间。
OmniBook Ultra 14 于今年一月发布,今年进行了全面升级,不仅提供了新的处理器选项,还采用了全新的机身设计。用户可根据配置选择高通骁龙 X2 或英特尔 Panther Lake 处理器,并有三种配色可供选择。
我们测试的这款是高端英特尔版本,搭载Core Ultra X9 388H处理器,售价约为2800美元。 搭载Core Ultra 7 368H的低配版本售价约为其一半,但所有版本均配备相同的1800p 120Hz OLED触控屏,甚至包括高通版本。
该领域的竞争对手包括其他14英寸专业级笔记本电脑,例如 戴尔XPS 14、 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra、 微星 Prestige 14 AI以及 联想 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14。
更多惠普评测:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
OmniBook 系列实际上取代了 Spectre 系列 ,因此其金属机身延续了前代产品的卓越特性,包括出色的刚性以及防指纹的哑光表面处理。新款设计与 旧款 2024 机型 ,其重新构思的键盘、重新设计的后角,以及沿边缘和角落更锐利的镀铬切割轮廓,都使其与众不同。如下方对比图表所示,它比 2024 款明显更轻、更小。
连接性
最新款的OmniBook取消了部分旧款机型上配备的USB-A接口。
沟通
网络摄像头
标配500万像素网络摄像头,配备红外功能和物理快门。

维护
可持续发展
机身框架中,金属部分高达80%采用再生材料,键盘和扬声器外壳中则有超过40%采用消费后再生塑料。包装本身完全不使用塑料。
配件与保修
零售包装盒内除电源适配器和说明书外,没有其他配件。若在美国购买,则适用常规的一年有限保修。
输入设备
键盘
显示
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 446 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.76 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
calibrated: 1.18
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
92.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6470 K
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Samsung SDC4215, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Samsung SDC41AA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 140WT2, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 ATNA40KW05-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Samsung ATNA40LE01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 2% | 2% | -0% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 99.3 -1% | 99.8 0% | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 96.2 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 92.3 | 87.7 -5% | 96.7 5% | 98.2 6% | 91.8 -1% | 86.7 -6% |
| Response Times | -39% | -32% | -21% | -95% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.58 ? | 0.64 ? -10% | 0.86 ? -48% | 0.75 ? -29% | 1.87 ? -222% | 0.71 ? -22% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.87 ? | 0.94 ? -8% | 1.01 ? -16% | 1.03 ? -18% | 1.53 ? -76% | 0.94 ? -8% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 927.13 ? | 479.46 ? | 469 ? | 240.62 ? | 480 ? | 968.8 ? |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 25 | 50 -100% | 33.3 -33% | 29 -16% | 22 12% | 20 20% |
| Screen | 5% | 17% | 7% | 1% | 28% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 446 | 470.7 6% | 363.9 -18% | 393.8 -12% | 292 -35% | 600.5 35% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 447 | 488 9% | 366 -18% | 389 -13% | 292 -35% | 612 37% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 99 | 94 -5% | 99 0% | 96 -3% | 98 -1% | 96 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.76 | 2.21 -26% | 0.84 52% | 1.27 28% | 1.4 20% | 1.18 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.29 | 5.02 -53% | 2.72 17% | 3.35 -2% | 2.2 33% | 3.4 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.18 | 0.82 31% | 0.82 31% | 0.71 40% | 0.73 38% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 0.6 74% | 1.1 52% | 2 13% | 1.7 26% | 1 57% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.18 101% | 2.19 100% | 2.12 104% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6470 100% | 6472 100% | 6330 103% | 6379 102% | 6510 100% | 6567 99% |
| Contrast (:1) | 29200 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-7% | -4% /
2% | -4% /
-0% | -31% /
-23% | 7% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.47 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.28 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 927.13 Hz Amplitude: 25 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 927.13 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 927.13 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7810 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
演出
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将惠普内置软件设置为“性能”模式。
处理器性能
该 Core Ultra X9 388H 在惠普笔记本上的运行速度比预期慢了约5%至10%。事实上,尽管华硕ExpertBook Ultra搭载的是性能较低的 Core Ultra X7 358H。这种性能差距部分归因于OmniBook Ultra 14有限的Turbo Boost潜力;如下方对比图表所示,在循环运行CineBench R15时,其性能会随时间推移下降约9%。
该 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 在2024款OmniBook中提供了约20%至25%更快的原始多线程性能。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 -1! | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 -1! | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (12225 - 15651, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (32079 - 82749, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (4178 - 4419, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (5099 - 7015, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (15864 - 44749, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (5271 - 61890, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (984 - 1170, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (6440 - 8317, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (33033 - 85600, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Single Precision GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Quantized GPU 1.7
| Performance rating | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 -3! | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 -3! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (9939 - 10123, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (11094 - 11646, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (16606 - 17914, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (13779 - 14164, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (2048 - 2155, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1834 - 1942, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (2390 - 2613, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1651 - 1797, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (339 - 354, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (314 - 318, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (430 - 431, n=2) | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9939 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (129450 - 131023, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (120487 - 131960, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (135141 - 135182, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (84 - 85, n=2) | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
M.2 2280 Phison PSEPN002TA87GT 这款 PCIe 5.0 SSD 在约 10000 MB/s 的速度下运行稳定,而 OmniBook Ultra 14 Flip 上的三星 PMPA1 在相同的压力测试下则会出现降频现象。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
GPU 性能
虽然其CPU的原始性能不如搭载AMD处理器的2024款OmniBook Ultra 14,但图形性能却显著更快,从而弥补了处理器性能的不足。该 Arc B390 的运行速度最高可达 Radeon 890M 快达2倍,足以在1080p分辨率下流畅运行现代高负载游戏。
遗憾的是,游戏帧率会出现波动而非保持稳定。例如,在1080p超高清画质下运行《赛博朋克2077》时,帧率会在39 FPS至44 FPS之间波动,而2024款OmniBook Ultra 14则能保持稳定的28 FPS。
如下方Fire Strike 测试结果表所示,若在“平衡”模式或电池供电状态下运行,整体性能会有所下降。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理运算得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 16347 | 28159 | 4136 |
| 平衡模式 | 13753 (-16%) | 23251 (-17%) | 3550 (-14%) |
| 电池电量 | 15865 (-3%) | 24559 (-13%) | 4451 (-8%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18234 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 34003 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13265 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6806 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
《赛博朋克2077》极高画质帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 181.8 | 176.9 | 99.6 | 43.7 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 110.8 | 84.5 | 99 | 97 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 129.8 | 75.2 | 54.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 62 | 51.4 | 42.2 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 335 | 137.5 | 114.9 | 101.3 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 72.2 | 61.3 | 54 | 53.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 74.2 | 60.1 | 51.9 | 44.9 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 141.8 | 131.9 | 101.4 | 35.6 |
排放
系统噪音
风扇噪音会达到与前代机型(如 OmniBook Ultra 14 Flip 或初代2024款OmniBook Ultra 14,因此从技术上讲,最新款的噪音水平并未明显增高或降低。不过,风扇在应对负载时会更快地加速,因此更早达到最大转速。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 42.9 / 44.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 9% | 3% | -3% | 5% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.3 | 23.1 1% | 22.9 2% | 22.9 2% | 25.4 -9% | 22.9 2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.3 | 25.4 -9% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% | 25.4 -9% | 23.4 -0% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.3 | 25.5 -9% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% | 25.4 -9% | 23.4 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23.3 | 25.5 -9% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% | 25.4 -9% | 23.4 -0% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 42.9 | 44.4 -3% | 27.8 35% | 34 21% | 33.1 23% | 28.6 33% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 44.4 | 43.4 2% | 33.6 24% | 43.5 2% | 46.5 -5% | 42.8 4% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 44.1 | 45.5 -3% | 43.4 2% | 45.7 -4% | 46.5 -5% | 45.2 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.2 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.2 F).
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | 0% | 2% | -9% | -1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40.2 | 33.6 16% | 35.8 11% | 34 15% | 47.1 -17% | 38.6 4% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 44.2 | 28.8 35% | 37.6 15% | 35.8 19% | 46.2 -5% | 38.4 13% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 22.8 | 25.2 -11% | 25.2 -11% | 25.6 -12% | 24.3 -7% | 24.6 -8% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 23.4 | 24.6 -5% | 26.6 -14% | 26.4 -13% | 24.5 -5% | 26 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 频率会提升至 2.9 GHz,功耗为 43 W,温度达到 86 摄氏度;约 30 秒后,频率降至 2.1 GHz,功耗降至 26 W,温度降至 71 摄氏度,这表明 Turbo Boost 技术的持续运行能力有限。这款 新款 XPS 14同样搭载了类似的Panther Lake处理器选项,其运行状态也会稳定在相近的水平。
运行《赛博朋克2077》时,即使设置为性能模式,GPU时钟频率仍会在1750至2200 MHz之间波动,这与上文GPU性能部分所述的帧率波动现象相吻合。 更稳定的时钟频率本应能带来更稳定的游戏性能,因为这种时钟频率的波动在其他笔记本电脑上并不常见。
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 61 |
| Prime95 压力测试 | 2.0 | -- | 71 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | 1.4 - 1.8 | 950 - 1450 | 66 - 72 |
| 赛博朋克2077 压力测试 | 0.8 | 1750 - 2200 | 64 - 70 |
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗
在满载状态下的功耗仅比 OmniBook Ultra 14 Flip 仅高出几瓦,但CPU和GPU性能却显著提升。从Lunar Lake升级到Panther Lake-X9时,每瓦性能的提升幅度极为可观。
65W交流适配器也已升级,体积比之前更小、更便携(6.5 x 3.2 x 3.2 厘米 vs. 9.8 x 5.4 x 2 厘米)。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, , OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | -5% | -12% | 3% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.5 | 3.2 -28% | 3 -20% | 3.1 -24% | 2.8 -12% | 3.5 -40% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 5.1 | 3.9 24% | 4.4 14% | 3.6 29% | 4.2 18% | 4 22% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 5.8 | 12.3 -112% | 9.4 -62% | 10 -72% | 4.5 22% | 5.3 9% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 49.8 | 36.5 27% | 42.3 15% | 39.2 21% | 48.9 2% | 43.7 12% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 55.1 | 50.6 8% | 49.9 9% | 51.2 7% | 58.6 -6% | 61.4 -11% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 55 | 51.1 7% | 51.1 7% | 51.4 7% | 59.9 -9% | 61.3 -11% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 68 | 69 -1% | 65 4% | 101.4 -49% | 64 6% | 63.4 7% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗测试 / 压力测试
外部显示器的功耗
电池续航时间
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 75 Wh | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 81 Wh | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 12.6 | 10.6 -16% | 14 11% | 16.8 33% | 19.6 56% | 16.1 28% |
Notebookcheck 评分
可以说,这款惠普笔记本电脑是专为旅行、视频编辑甚至游戏而设计的最佳专业级消费级产品,但它的价格也恰恰是最昂贵的之一。
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9
- 06/12/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Intel Core Ultra X9 388H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 2800 USD | 1.3 kg | 10.7 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1700 USD | 978 g | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1250 USD | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,099.95 Dell XPS 14 Premium Laptop D... 2. $1,899.00 Dell XPS 14 9440 14.5" Noteb... 3. $2,099.99 Dell XPS 16 9640 Laptop | In... List Price: 2200 USD | 1.4 kg | 14.62 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,414.25 MSI Prestige 14 AI+ EVO PRE1... 2. $2,299.00 MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ 16"... 3. $1,479.00 MSI Prestige 16 AI+ Evo 16" ... List Price: 1549€ | 1.4 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: | 1.1 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.















































































