Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Intel Ultra X7 358H

英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 是 Panther Lake 系列笔记本电脑的高端 16 核 SoC，也是配备快速 12 核 iGPU 的第二快型号。

368H 集成了英特尔采用全新 18A 工艺制造的计算芯片。其中包括 4 个大型 Cougar Cove P 核（主频高达 1.9 - 4.8 GHz）、8 个 Darkmont E 核（主频 1.5 - 3.7 GHz）和另外 4 个小型 Darkmont LP（低功耗）E 核（主频 1.5 - 3.3 GHz）。此外，还安装了带有 50 TOPS INT 8 的新型 NPU 5 和 IPU 7.5 图像处理器。集成内存控制器支持高达 96 GB LPDDR5-9600。

GPU 芯片包含一个快速 iGPU，具有 12 个 Xe3 内核，支持光线追踪，由台积电采用 N3E 工艺制造。

第三个芯片组集成了平台控制器，具有 12 个 PCIe 通道、4 个 Thunderbolt 4、Wi-Fi 7 (R2) 和蓝牙 Core 6.0。

据英特尔公司称，TDP 规定为 15 - 25 瓦（基本），短期内可达 80 瓦。

CodenamePanther Lake
SeriesIntel Panther Lake

Series: Panther Lake Panther Lake

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H1.6 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X9 378H1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H1.6 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H « 1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H1.6 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H1.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Arc G3 Extreme - 4.7 GHz14 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Arc G3 - 4.6 GHz14 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3551.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H1.5 - 4.6 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3651.8 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3351.6 - 4.6 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3251.6 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3321.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3221.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1500 - 4800 MHz
Level 2 Cache12.5 MB
Level 3 Cache18 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core
4 x 3.3 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)25 Watt
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt
Manufacturing Technology2 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFCBGA2540
GPUIntel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/05/2026
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
41.9 pt (70%)
AMD E1-2100
2.26 -95%
...
Intel Core i9-12950HX
40.4 -4%
Intel Core i7-13800H
41 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
41.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
41.4 -1%
Intel Core i9-12900HX
41.4 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
41.5 -1%
Intel Core 7 250H
41.6 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
41.7 0%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
41.8 0%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
41.9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
42 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
42 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42 0%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
42.2 1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
42.6 2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
42.7 2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
42.9 2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
42.9 2%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
43.3 3%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
49.1 17%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
59.6 42%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2026 - Cinebench 2026 CPU Single Thread
min: 505     avg: 508     median: 508 (69%)     max: 514 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2026 - Cinebench 2026 CPU Multi
min: 3990     avg: 4197     median: 4087 (40%)     max: 4512 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.4     avg: 124.1     median: 123.9 (1%)     max: 125.5 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 974     avg: 1028     median: 1000 (19%)     max: 1125 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13187     avg: 18264     median: 18747 (17%)     max: 19841 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2037     avg: 2074     median: 2080 (85%)     max: 2087 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
2038 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2043 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
2043 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
2044 -1%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2055 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
2057 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
2066 0%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 0%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
2074
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2082 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2110 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2138 3%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 4%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2154 4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2180 5%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
2188 5%
...
Apple M5 10-Core
2459 19%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 767     avg: 783     median: 784 (85%)     max: 792 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6848     avg: 7353     median: 7316 (18%)     max: 7749 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2937     avg: 3030     median: 3046 (19%)     max: 3135 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170123513001365143014951560162516901755182018851950201520802145221022752340240524702535260026652730279528602925299030553120Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 286     avg: 302.3     median: 305.5 (85%)     max: 312 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
37.5 Points (47%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.7 Points (89%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11033 points (67%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
70882 points (51%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
113910 Points (71%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17731 Points (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
290.7 s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.2 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6917 points (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 58746     avg: 64358     median: 64553.5 (37%)     max: 68533 MIPS
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6091     avg: 6264     median: 6198.5 (71%)     max: 6526 MIPS
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
171.7 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
346 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 19.5     avg: 21.3     median: 21 (37%)     max: 23.1 fps
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.4 GB/s (41%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.8 GB/s (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 282     avg: 325.8     median: 330 (4%)     max: 389 Seconds
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 171     avg: 192.3     median: 196 (1%)     max: 218 Seconds
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4127     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4483 sec
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14546     avg: 14839     median: 14838.5 (25%)     max: 15131 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 88423     avg: 92891     median: 92890.5 (68%)     max: 97358 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19019     avg: 20793     median: 20769.5 (51%)     max: 22161 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 62464     avg: 80202     median: 88742 (72%)     max: 89399 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 62467     avg: 76212     median: 76212 (62%)     max: 89957 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 89104     avg: 89245     median: 89244.5 (72%)     max: 89385 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13184     avg: 17599     median: 18829 (48%)     max: 19879 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 22086     avg: 27305     median: 27805.5 (50%)     max: 30850 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8186     avg: 12854     median: 13391.5 (56%)     max: 14585 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 Single-Core
min: 2818     avg: 2873     median: 2864 (66%)     max: 2927 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 Multi-Core
min: 15698     avg: 16584     median: 16674 (57%)     max: 17121 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2768 points (86%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
15527 points (64%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2030     avg: 2100     median: 2107.5 (71%)     max: 2142 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16012     avg: 16564     median: 16652.5 (30%)     max: 17028 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2062 points (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
15868 points (50%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8831 points (80%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
56812 points (54%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 445     avg: 451     median: 449.5 (1%)     max: 460 ms
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
116743 Points (76%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 278     avg: 293.7     median: 300 (75%)     max: 305 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 293     avg: 317.5     median: 317 (53%)     max: 338 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1884     avg: 2032     median: 2045 (72%)     max: 2119 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56.8     avg: 66.4     median: 64.9 (11%)     max: 88.9 Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62.8     avg: 76.9     median: 75 (14%)     max: 93.9 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.43     avg: 4.4     median: 4.2 (3%)     max: 5.89 Watt
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567891011Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.26     avg: 4.5     median: 4 (3%)     max: 7.86 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789101112Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 32.8     avg: 40.7     median: 40.6 (30%)     max: 48.4 Points per Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Amazon Logo
  • $2,349.99
    Samsung 16” Galaxy Book6 Ultra Copilot+ PC, AI Business Laptop, Windows 11 Pro, Intel Core Ultra X7 Processor 358H, Intel Arc B390 GPU, 32GB/512GB, AMOLED 2X Display, 2026 Model NP964UJH-XG1US, Gray
  • $2,599.00
    LG gram Pro 16-inch Thin and Lightweight Dual AI Laptop Computer, Windows 11 Home, Copilot+ PC, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, OLED Display, Aerominum Black
  • $2,699.99
    LG gram Pro 16-inch Thin and Lightweight Dual AI Laptop Computer, Windows 11 Home, Copilot+ PC, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, OLED Display, Aerominum Silver
  • $2,449.99
    Samsung 16” Galaxy Book6 Ultra X7 PC Laptop Computer, Intel Processor, 32GB/1TB, Dynamic AMOLED 2X Display, Advanced Cooling, Ultra Performance, 2 Year Warranty, Gray
  • $2,599.99
    LG gram Pro 16-inch Thin and Lightweight Dual AI Laptop Computer, Windows 11 Home, Copilot+ PC, Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, OLED Display, Aerominum Silver

v1.35
log 27. 14:18:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 27 May 2026 09:51:16 +0200 +0.005s ... 0.005s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.007s ... 0.012s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#20 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.016s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 20438 +0.04s ... 0.056s

#23 got single benchmarks 20438 +0.029s ... 0.086s

#24 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#25 min, max, avg, median took s +2.98s ... 3.065s

#26 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.323s ... 3.388s

#27 return log +0s ... 3.388s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H processor

宏碁 Swift 16 AI 评测：高性能与出色散热的完美结合

宏碁 Swift 16 AI 评测：高性能与出色散热的完美结合

新款宏碁 Swift 16 AI 将英特尔的 Panther Lake 架构与鲜艳的 OLED 屏幕和超大触摸板完美结合。硬件安装在光滑的机箱中，并得益于出色的冷却系统。工作温度非常低。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 16", 1.4 kg
Prestige 16 AI+ C3MTG 评测：微星新标识看起来很时尚

Prestige 16 AI+ C3MTG 评测：微星新标识看起来很时尚

最新的 Prestige 16 为该系列带来了重大变化，包括英特尔 Panther Lake、所有配置的 OLED 以及全新的外观。不过，与去年的设计相比，一些关键功能有所缺失或减少。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 16", 1.6 kg
戴尔 XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H 评测：退出英伟达，加入英特尔 Arc B390

戴尔 XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H 评测：退出英伟达，加入英特尔 Arc B390

Core Ultra X7 XPS 16 配置比基本型号贵 400 美元，提供更多内存、更大存储空间和显著更高的性能，而无需提高风扇噪音、功耗或温度。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 16", 1.7 kg
Khadas Mind Pro

凯达斯 Mind Pro 评测：配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 和 Arc 图形处理器的高端迷你电脑是 Khadas 生态系统的完美基础

卡达斯通过 Mind Pro 扩展了 Mind 系列，并采用了最新一代的英特尔处理器。在我们的测试中，我们将仔细观察配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 处理器的机型，通过大量基准测试分析其性能，并考察其与 Mind Graphics 2 的结合性能。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 566 g
豹湖电池带来近 20 小时的续航时间--微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 可折叠机型评测

豹湖电池带来近 20 小时的续航时间--微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 可折叠机型评测

微星推出的 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 是一款小巧的 14 英寸可折叠电脑，配备快速的 Panther Lake 处理器和集成手写笔。不过，内置的 60 Hz OLED 屏幕非常暗，而且不支持 HDR。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.4 kg

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » 戴尔 XPS 14 2026 评测：搭载英特尔豹湖 X7，全面重生

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 评测：英特尔豹湖 X7 的精彩首秀

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » 戴尔 XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 宏碁 Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX

HP OmniBook X 16 (2026): Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 16 (2026)

HP EliteBook X G2i 14 NG AI: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X G2i 14 NG AI

Dell XPS 14 (2026) DA14260: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 戴尔 XPS 14 (2026) DA14260

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » SamsungGalaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T-75YX: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.4 kg
   » 宏碁 Swift 16 即使在压力下也能保持凉爽

MSI Prestige 16 AI C3MTG: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » 微星Prestige 16 AI+的65瓦交流适配器会使充电速度遇到瓶颈

   » 微星威望 16 C3MTG 是目前市场上最好的 XPS 16 替代品之一

   » 2026 Prestige 16 在 1080p 超高画质下运行《赛博朋克 2077》的速度超过 45 FPS，而它甚至不是一台游戏笔记本电脑

   » 微星可能不想让你知道的 2026 Prestige 16 的所有变化

   » 微星 Prestige 16 AI+ C3MTG 在平衡模式下运行噪音明显降低，但有一个问题

Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.7 kg
   » 与最新的 XPS 16 相比，选择戴尔 16 Premium 的两大理由

   » 戴尔 XPS 16 酷睿 Ultra X7 比酷睿 Ultra 5 声音更大、更耗电

   » 戴尔 XPS 配备了比大多数其他笔记本电脑更多的电池充电选项

   » 戴尔 XPS 16 OLED 配置带来了一些有趣的优缺点

   » 避免选择新的 XPS 16 Core Ultra 7，而直接选择性能更优越的 Core Ultra X7

Khadas Mind Pro: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 0.6 kg
   » 卡达斯 Mind Pro 迷你电脑价格上涨：预购价格有效期至 3 月 27 日

   » 卡达斯 Mind Pro 迷你电脑评测：从办公电脑到配备GeForce RTX GPU 的游戏系统

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 戴尔 XPS 14 Arc B390 与GeForce RTX 4050：3DMark 对比不能说明一切

   » 在打开 2026 型之前，请务必阅读戴尔 XPS 14 维修手册

   » 2026 戴尔 XPS 14 解决了该系列最令人不满的一些问题

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book6 系列上手体验：所有型号、价格和上市日期

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » Core Ultra X7 358H 与 Core Ultra 7 255H：Panther Lake 节流更少，性能更稳定

   » Arc B390 与 Radeon 8060S：相同的 14 英寸屏幕尺寸，两款截然不同的 GPU

   » 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 的速度与许多入门级游戏笔记本电脑不相上下，体积却只有它们的一半

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Panther Lake

» Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X9 378H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Arc G3 Extreme
   14x - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Arc G3
   14x - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 355
   8x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 365
   8x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 335
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 325
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 332
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 322
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX
   12x 2.9 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-01-12)