Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Intel Ultra X7 358H

英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 是 Panther Lake 系列笔记本电脑的高端 16 核 SoC，也是配备快速 12 核 iGPU 的第二快型号。

368H 集成了英特尔采用全新 18A 工艺制造的计算芯片。其中包括 4 个大型 Cougar Cove P 核（主频高达 1.9 - 4.8 GHz）、8 个 Darkmont E 核（主频 1.5 - 3.7 GHz）和另外 4 个小型 Darkmont LP（低功耗）E 核（主频 1.5 - 3.3 GHz）。此外，还安装了带有 50 TOPS INT 8 的新型 NPU 5 和 IPU 7.5 图像处理器。集成内存控制器支持高达 96 GB LPDDR5-9600。

GPU 芯片包含一个快速 iGPU，具有 12 个 Xe3 内核，支持光线追踪，由台积电采用 N3E 工艺制造。

第三个芯片组集成了平台控制器，具有 12 个 PCIe 通道、4 个 Thunderbolt 4、Wi-Fi 7 (R2) 和蓝牙 Core 6.0。

据英特尔公司称，TDP 规定为 15 - 25 瓦（基本），短期内可达 80 瓦。

CodenamePanther Lake
SeriesIntel Panther Lake

Series: Panther Lake Panther Lake

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H1.6 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H1.6 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H « 1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H1.6 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H1.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3551.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H1.5 - 4.6 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3651.8 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3351.6 - 4.6 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3251.6 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3221.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3321.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1500 - 4800 MHz
Level 2 Cache12.5 MB
Level 3 Cache18 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core
4 x 3.3 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)25 Watt
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt
Manufacturing Technology2 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFCBGA2540
GPUIntel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/05/2026
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
42.2 pt (71%)
AMD E1-2100
2.26 -95%
...
Intel Core i9-12900HX
41.4 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
41.5 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
41.6 -1%
Intel Core 7 250H
41.6 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
41.7 -1%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
41.8 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
42 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
42 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42 0%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
42.2
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
42.2 0%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
42.6 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
42.7 1%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
42.9 2%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
43.3 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
43.6 3%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
43.8 4%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44.4 5%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
44.6 6%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
49.1 16%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
59.6 41%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2026 - Cinebench 2026 CPU Single Thread
min: 505     avg: 509     median: 508.5 (69%)     max: 514 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2026 - Cinebench 2026 CPU Multi
min: 3990     avg: 4239     median: 4226 (42%)     max: 4512 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.4     avg: 124.2     median: 124 (1%)     max: 125.5 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 974     avg: 1038     median: 1004 (19%)     max: 1125 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17457     avg: 18789     median: 18932 (18%)     max: 19841 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2079     avg: 2085     median: 2086 (85%)     max: 2087 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2043 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
2043 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
2044 -2%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2055 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
2057 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
2067 -1%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -1%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 0%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
2085
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2110 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2138 3%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2154 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2180 5%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
2188 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2194 5%
Apple M4 10-Core
2202 6%
...
Apple M5 10-Core
2459 18%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 780     avg: 786     median: 786 (85%)     max: 792 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6848     avg: 7393     median: 7437 (18%)     max: 7749 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2986     avg: 3061     median: 3053 (19%)     max: 3135 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
01603204806408009601120128014401600176019202080224024002560272028803040Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 292     avg: 305.8     median: 309 (86%)     max: 312 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
37.5 Points (47%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.7 Points (89%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11033 points (67%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
70882 points (51%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
113910 Points (71%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17731 Points (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
290.7 s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.2 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6917 points (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 58746     avg: 64559     median: 64852 (37%)     max: 68533 MIPS
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6170     avg: 6336     median: 6323 (72%)     max: 6526 MIPS
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
171.7 fps (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
346 fps (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 19.5     avg: 21.2     median: 21 (37%)     max: 23.1 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.4 GB/s (41%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.8 GB/s (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 288     avg: 328.8     median: 328 (4%)     max: 389 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 175     avg: 193.8     median: 196 (1%)     max: 218 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4127     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4279 sec
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14546     avg: 14839     median: 14838.5 (25%)     max: 15131 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 88423     avg: 92891     median: 92890.5 (68%)     max: 97358 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19019     avg: 20671     median: 20638 (51%)     max: 22161 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 62464     avg: 75603     median: 75603 (61%)     max: 88742 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 62467     avg: 76212     median: 76212 (62%)     max: 89957 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 89104     avg: 89245     median: 89244.5 (72%)     max: 89385 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 14635     avg: 18026     median: 18829 (48%)     max: 19452 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 22086     avg: 26923     median: 27805.5 (50%)     max: 30162 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11953     avg: 13381     median: 13391.5 (56%)     max: 14585 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 Single-Core
min: 2836     avg: 2886     median: 2894 (67%)     max: 2927 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 Multi-Core
min: 15698     avg: 16657     median: 16808.5 (57%)     max: 17121 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2768 points (86%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
15527 points (64%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2097     avg: 2118     median: 2117 (71%)     max: 2142 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16310     avg: 16773     median: 16836 (30%)     max: 17028 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2062 points (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
15868 points (50%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8831 points (87%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
56812 points (54%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 445     avg: 450.2     median: 449 (1%)     max: 460 ms
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
116743 Points (76%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 278     avg: 292.8     median: 300 (75%)     max: 305 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 293     avg: 312     median: 304 (51%)     max: 338 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1884     avg: 2018     median: 2053 (72%)     max: 2114 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56.8     avg: 62.2     median: 63.4 (11%)     max: 65.7 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62.8     avg: 79.4     median: 85.2 (16%)     max: 93.9 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.43     avg: 4.3     median: 4 (3%)     max: 5.89 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567891011Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.26     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (3%)     max: 4.29 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 32.8     avg: 39.8     median: 35.8 (27%)     max: 48.4 Points per Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.35
log 11. 20:04:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Apr 2026 05:29:57 +0200 +0.006s ... 0.006s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.007s ... 0.013s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#17 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.018s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 20438 +0.049s ... 0.068s

#20 got single benchmarks 20438 +0.024s ... 0.092s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +4.27s ... 4.361s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.134s ... 4.495s

#24 return log +0s ... 4.495s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H processor

Khadas Mind Pro

凯达斯 Mind Pro 评测：配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 和 Arc 图形处理器的高端迷你电脑是 Khadas 生态系统的完美基础

卡达斯通过 Mind Pro 扩展了 Mind 系列，并采用了最新一代的英特尔处理器。在我们的测试中，我们将仔细观察配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 处理器的机型，通过大量基准测试分析其性能，并考察其与 Mind Graphics 2 的结合性能。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 566 g
豹湖电池带来近 20 小时的续航时间--微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 可折叠机型评测

豹湖电池带来近 20 小时的续航时间--微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 可折叠机型评测

微星推出的 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 是一款小巧的 14 英寸可折叠电脑，配备快速的 Panther Lake 处理器和集成手写笔。不过，内置的 60 Hz OLED 屏幕非常暗，而且不支持 HDR。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.4 kg
戴尔 XPS 14 2026 评测：搭载英特尔豹湖 X7，全面重生

戴尔 XPS 14 2026 评测：搭载英特尔豹湖 X7，全面重生

XPS 系列在发展道路上经历了一些坎坷，但最新的 Panther Lake XPS 14 让这个家族重回正轨，比最近的任何前代产品都更容易获得推荐。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.4 kg
华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 评测：英特尔豹湖 X7 的精彩首秀

华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 评测：英特尔豹湖 X7 的精彩首秀

随着酷睿 Ultra X7 358H 的首次亮相，华硕和英特尔为今年开了个好头。虽然从技术上讲这是一款面向商务的笔记本电脑，但其图形性能和每瓦性能对于一款 14 英寸的笔记本电脑来说都是超乎寻常的。
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.1 kg

HP OmniBook X 16 (2026): Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook X 16 (2026)

HP EliteBook X G2i 14 NG AI: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook X G2i 14 NG AI

Dell XPS 14 (2026) DA14260: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 戴尔 XPS 14 (2026) DA14260

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » SamsungGalaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE

Khadas Mind Pro: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 0.6 kg
   » 卡达斯 Mind Pro 迷你电脑价格上涨：预购价格有效期至 3 月 27 日

   » 卡达斯 Mind Pro 迷你电脑评测：从办公电脑到配备GeForce RTX GPU 的游戏系统

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » 戴尔 XPS 14 Arc B390 与GeForce RTX 4050：3DMark 对比不能说明一切

   » 在打开 2026 型之前，请务必阅读戴尔 XPS 14 维修手册

   » 2026 戴尔 XPS 14 解决了该系列最令人不满的一些问题

Samsung Galaxy Book6 Pro NP960XJG-KG6DE: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book6 系列上手体验：所有型号、价格和上市日期

Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.1 kg
   » Core Ultra X7 358H 与 Core Ultra 7 255H：Panther Lake 节流更少，性能更稳定

   » Arc B390 与 Radeon 8060S：相同的 14 英寸屏幕尺寸，两款截然不同的 GPU

   » 华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 的速度与许多入门级游戏笔记本电脑不相上下，体积却只有它们的一半

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Panther Lake

» Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 355
   8x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 365
   8x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 335
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 325
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 322
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 332
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX
   12x 2.9 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-01-12)