Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

Intel Ultra X9 388H

英特尔酷睿 Ultra X9 388H 是 Panther Lake 系列的高端 16 核 SoC，也是配备 12 个 Xe3 GPU 内核的顶级型号。该芯片还提供 18 MB 缓存。该处理器支持 vPro 管理功能。

388H 集成了英特尔采用新的 18A 工艺制造的计算芯片。其中包括 4 个大型 Cougar Cove P 核（主频为 2.1 - 5.1 GHz）、8 个 Darkmont E 核（主频为 1.6 - 4 GHz）和另外 4 个小型 Darkmont LP（低功耗）E 核（主频为 1.6 - 3.7 GHz）。此外，还安装了带有 50 TOPS INT 8 的新型 NPU 5 和 IPU 7.5 图像处理器。集成内存控制器支持高达 96 GB LPDDR5X-9600。

GPU 芯片包含一个快速 iGPU，具有 12 个 Xe3 内核，支持光线追踪，由台积电采用 N3E 工艺制造。

第三个芯片组集成了平台控制器，具有 12 个 PCIe 通道、4 个 Thunderbolt 4、Wi-Fi 7 (R2) 和蓝牙 Core 6.0。

据英特尔公司称，TDP 规定为 15 - 25 瓦（基本），短期内可达 80 瓦。

CodenamePanther Lake
SeriesIntel Panther Lake

Series: Panther Lake Panther Lake

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H « 1.6 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H1.6 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H1.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 12 cores
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H1.6 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3551.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H1.5 - 4.6 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3651.8 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3351.6 - 4.6 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3251.6 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3221.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Intel Core Ultra 5 3321.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Clock Rate1600 - 5100 MHz
Level 3 Cache18 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
4 x 5.1 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core
8 x 4.0 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)25 Watt
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt
Manufacturing Technology1.8 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFCBGA2540
GPUIntel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT8
Chip AI180 TOPS INT8
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/05/2026
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
43.9 pt (73%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
Intel Core 7 250H
42.2 -4%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
42.3 -4%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
42.6 -3%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
42.8 -3%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
42.9 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
43.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 -1%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
43.9
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.1 0%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 1%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 3%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.1 3%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
45.5 4%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46 5%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.6 6%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
46.8 7%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
49.7 13%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 37%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
129.8 Points (65%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 794     avg: 1021     median: 1043 (19%)     max: 1172 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
20159 Points (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2188 Points (89%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -97%
...
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -6%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 -5%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
2083 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2110 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2138 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2154 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2180 0%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
2188
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2194 0%
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2202 1%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2209 1%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2213 1%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 4%
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
2459 12%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
834 Points (91%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7864 Points (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3198 Points (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
01603204806408009601120128014401600176019202080224024002560272028803040Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
306 Points (85%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
68350 MIPS (39%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6655 MIPS (78%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
23.7 fps (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
282 Seconds (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
170 Seconds (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23185 Points (57%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
33013 Points (59%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
15213 Points (64%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 3020     avg: 3043     median: 3043 (70%)     max: 3066 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 17694     avg: 17809     median: 17809 (69%)     max: 17924 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-9120C
533 -97%
...
Intel Core i7-13850HX
16782 -6%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
16828 -6%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
16957 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
17242 -3%
Apple M5 (10 Cores)
17299 -3%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17401 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
17557 -1%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
17564 -1%
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
17576 -1%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
17809
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
17915 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
18113 2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392
18590 4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
18887 6%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
19000 7%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19359 9%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
19741 11%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
20200 13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100
20320 14%
...
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
25760 45%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2191 points (74%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
17350 points (31%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
430 ms (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
110858 Points (73%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
314 Points (82%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
339 Points (61%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2155 Points (75%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
77.6 Watt (13%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
88.2 Watt (16%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6 Watt (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.8 Watt (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
36.3 Points per Watt (27%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Amazon Logo
  • msi Modern 15 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H(Beat i9-13900H), 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, 15.6" Full HD IPS Touchscreen Display, Backlit Keyboard, Windows 11
  • Intel Core Ultra 9 Desktop Processor 285K - 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) and 24 threads - Up to 5.7 GHz unlocked - 40 MB Cache - Compatible with Intel 800 series chipset-based motherboards - Inte
  • Intel Core Ultra 7 Desktop Processor 265K - 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.5 GHz
  • Intel Core Ultra 7 Desktop Processor 265KF - 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.5 GHz
  • Dell XPS 14 9440 AI Powered Laptop • Intel 16-Core Ultra 7 155H (> i9-10885H) • 14.5" WUXGA (1920 x 1200) Display • Intel Arc Graphics • 16GB DDR5X RAM, 512GB PCIe SSD • Win 11 Pro • Backlit KB

v1.35
log 26. 06:42:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Feb 2026 05:27:06 +0100 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.007s ... 0.009s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#17 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.013s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 20016 +0.026s ... 0.039s

#20 got single benchmarks 20016 +0.01s ... 0.049s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +0.895s ... 0.944s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.671s ... 1.615s

#24 return log +0s ... 1.615s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H processor

英特尔 Arc B390 性能和效率分析。(图片来源：英特尔）

英特尔 Panther Lake Arc B390 性能和效率分析：英特尔新 iGPU 与 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 互有胜负

英特尔新推出的 Panther Lake 处理器不仅提供了更高的 CPU 性能，最重要的是还采用了速度极快的集成显卡。Arc B390 比以前的 iGPU 快约 70%，甚至能赶上GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 GPU 的速度。
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.7 kg
华硕 ZenBook Duo UX8407 可折叠笔记本评测--英特尔豹湖改变游戏规则

华硕 ZenBook Duo UX8407 可折叠笔记本评测--英特尔豹湖改变游戏规则

华硕为 2026 年重新设计了双屏 ZenBook Duo 可折叠本，使其在多个方面都更胜一筹。其中包括新的英特尔豹湖处理器，CPU 内核效率更高，iGPU 速度更快，几乎可以让GeForce RTX 4050 变得无关紧要。
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.7 kg
英特尔豹湖酷睿™ Ultra X9 388H 性能分析--效率超越 Arrow Lake，超越 Zen 5

英特尔豹湖酷睿™ Ultra X9 388H 性能分析--效率超越 Arrow Lake，超越 Zen 5

英特尔公司代号为 Panther Lake 的新移动处理器旨在提供更高的性能和效率。我们用酷睿 Ultra X9 388H 测试了最新的顶级型号，以了解新一代处理器在性能和效率方面的真正优势。
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 14", 1.7 kg

Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA: Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » 华硕新款 Zenbook Duo UX8407 堪称最佳双屏可折叠产品

   » AMD 毫无胜算：英特尔豹湖酷睿 X9 388H 在低功耗下击败 AMD Strix Halo，预示 2026 年掌上游戏的霸主地位

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Panther Lake

» Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 355
   8x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 365
   8x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 335
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 325
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 322
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 332
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i9-13950HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
   16x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
+ Apple M3 Max 14-Core
   14x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-14700HX
   20x 3.9 GHz - 5.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX
   12x 2.9 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
   12x 3.2 GHz - 5 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-01-12)