Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)

AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)

AMD Radeon R4是一款支持DirectX 11.2的集成显卡,使用于一部分AMD APU中(例如A6-6310)。它提供了128个着色核心和两个运算单元,基于GCN架构。主频最高可达800MHz。这款显卡没有独立的显存,需要使用系统内存(单通道DDR3L-1866)。 借助它的UVD芯片,这款显卡可以支持最高4K分辨率的视频硬解码。另外,它还集成了一个特别的视频编码器,名叫VCE。视频信号可以通过VGA,DVI,HDMI 1.4a和DisplayPort 1.2最多输出到两个外接显示器上。 Radeon R4的性能接近于Radeon HD 7470或Intel HD Graphics 4200。通常情况下,要求较低的游戏如FIFA可以流畅运行。

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon R Series
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) 128 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R4 (Beema) 128 @ 0.8 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) 128 @ 0.35 - 0.69 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) 128 @ 0.3 - 0.6 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R6 (Mullins) 128 @ 0.5 GHz64 Bit
CodenameBeema
ArchitectureGCN 1.1
Pipelines128 - unified
Core Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.0
technology28 nm
Date of Announcement29.04.2014
CPU in Radeon R4 (Beema)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD A6-73104 x 2000 MHz, 12-25 W? MHz800 MHz
AMD A6-63104 x 1800 MHz, 15 W? MHz800 MHz
min. - max.? MHz800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.2 pt (3%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -59%
...
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) -9%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G -8%
Intel HD Graphics 4200 -7%
AMD Radeon HD 8400 -5%
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
AMD Radeon HD 8610G 3%
NVIDIA GeForce 910M 7%
Intel HD Graphics 4400 8%
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) 8%
Intel UHD Graphics 610 14%
...
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
29548 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 2459     avg: 2791     median: 2825 (4%)     max: 3037 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 3068     avg: 3275     median: 3309 (2%)     max: 3398 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 442     avg: 472     median: 472 (1%)     max: 500 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 464     avg: 500     median: 497 (1%)     max: 531 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 35441     avg: 36872     median: 35928 (5%)     max: 40855 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 753     avg: 793     median: 788 (2%)     max: 837 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 681     avg: 721     median: 716 (1%)     max: 763 Points
...
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) -11%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G -6%
Intel UHD Graphics 605 -3%
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) 1%
Intel HD Graphics 4400 5%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU 6148%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2506 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2111 Points (2%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200 -97%
...
Intel HD Graphics 4200 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M -5%
Intel UHD Graphics 600 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M -1%
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) 4%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 5%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G 5%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v 5%
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS 5%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU 4752%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
10908 Points (6%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
6421 Points (9%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 -98%
...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530 -4%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT -4%
ATI Mobility Radeon X800XT -2%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8400 0%
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics 1%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX 3%
Intel UHD Graphics 600 3%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6800M 626%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
4046 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2657     avg: 3122     median: 3092.5 (13%)     max: 3674 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.64     avg: 14.8     median: 15 (5%)     max: 15.45 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 14.04     avg: 15.7     median: 16 (4%)     max: 16.93 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 73     avg: 78     median: 78 (0%)     max: 83 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 134     avg: 137     median: 136.5 (0%)     max: 139 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
445 points (1%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
11.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
8.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
52.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
11.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
15.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
13.5 16.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.7 9.9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
12.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
7.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
33.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
33 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24 28 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
9.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
13.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
14.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
28.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
16.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
52.4 56.9 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.3 21.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
10.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
16.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
8.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
4.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
5.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
21.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
4.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
12.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9  fps    + Compare