联想超薄7 Pro X笔记本电脑评测。华硕VivoBook 14的替代品
在几个月前回顾了由英特尔驱动的联想Slim 7i Pro X之后,我们现在准备看看它的AMD同等产品,即由Ryzen 9 6900HS CPU而不是Core i7-12700H驱动的联想Slim 7 Pro X。除此之外,其他几乎所有的东西都保持不变,包括14.5英寸3K触摸屏,55WGeForce RTX 3050 GPU,以及整体机箱设计。我们建议查看我们的 对英特尔型号的现有评论以了解更多关于笔记本电脑的物理特性。
目前的AMD SKU包括Ryzen 7 6800H或Ryzen 9 6900HS CPU,配备高达2TB的PCIe4存储或32GB的焊接内存。整个产品系列固定使用相同的显示屏和Nvidia GPU。价格从1100美元开始,到我们的全配置评测单元的1500美元。
Slim 7 Pro或Slim 7i Pro的替代品包括其他中高档14英寸笔记本电脑,如戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420,MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo, 华硕VivoBook S14, 或Acer Swift X 14.
更多联想评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.9 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
87.7 % | 12/2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
86.6 % | 09/2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89.4 % | 03/2023 | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.2 % | 09/2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 18.87 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
86.1 % | 07/2022 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳--比大多数14英寸笔记本电脑更薄,配有GeForce RTX显卡
沟通
我们的AMD设备配备了Realtek RTL8852BE Wi-Fi 6模块,而不是更快的Intel AX211 Wi-Fi 6E。性能稳定,但即使在我们的Netgear AXE11000路由器上进行多次重新测试后,性能还是慢了一半。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
网络摄像头
200万像素的网络摄像头使用了电子快门,而不是物理快门。红外线是支持你好的标准。
维护
底部面板仅由5颗T5 Torx螺钉固定,便于维修。用户可以在焊接RAM的同时拆除SSD、WLAN和电池模块。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,零售盒中没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,通常有一年的制造商有限保修。
显示器 - 非游戏玩家的G-Sync和MUX
联想为Slim 7i Pro X和Slim 7 Pro X采用了相同的CSOT T3 MNE507ZA1-1 IPS面板,因此两款机型的观看体验基本上是相同的。该面板支持大多数高端功能,包括原生120赫兹刷新率、全sRGB覆盖、G-Sync、触摸屏和低蓝光排放。黑白响应时间仍然相对较慢,因此这款笔记本电脑并不适合玩快速移动的游戏。如果OLED是你喜欢的更快的响应时间和更深的色彩,那么你就得考虑瑜伽瘦身9代替,因为Slim 7 Pro X系列没有这样的选择。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 426.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1422:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.63
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
67.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 CSOT T3 MNE507ZA1-1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE MNE507ZA1-1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng BOE0929, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 InfoVision 140NWHE, IPS, 2240x1400, 14.00 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT AU Optronics B140QAN04.R, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 32% | 3% | 3% | 25% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66 | 65.7 0% | 99.61 51% | 69.3 5% | 68.8 4% | 97.8 48% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.5 | 92.1 -6% | 99.98 2% | 98.5 0% | 99.3 1% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.7 | 67.7 0% | 97.18 44% | 70.4 4% | 69.5 3% | 85.9 27% |
Response Times | 21% | 94% | 15% | 22% | 54% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42.8 ? | 35 ? 18% | 2 ? 95% | 44.9 ? -5% | 32.8 ? 23% | 16.9 ? 61% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.7 ? | 22 ? 23% | 2 ? 93% | 18.9 ? 34% | 22.8 ? 21% | 15.4 ? 46% |
PWM Frequency | 357 ? | |||||
Screen | 27% | 105% | -12% | -11% | -33% | |
Brightness middle | 426.5 | 430 1% | 361 -15% | 451 6% | 331.1 -22% | 496.7 16% |
Brightness | 414 | 408 -1% | 365 -12% | 439 6% | 326 -21% | 468 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 85 -3% | 93 6% | 92 5% | 85 -3% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.29 3% | 0.02 93% | 0.31 -3% | 0.29 3% | 0.3 -0% |
Contrast | 1422 | 1483 4% | 18050 1169% | 1455 2% | 1142 -20% | 1656 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.07 | 0.7 66% | 2.91 -41% | 2.46 -19% | 2.23 -8% | 3.93 -90% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.76 | 1.3 73% | 5.17 -9% | 4.24 11% | 5.44 -14% | 7.9 -66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.63 | 0.4 37% | 2.32 -268% | 1.32 -110% | 0.63 -0% | 1.27 -102% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.3 59% | 2.58 19% | 3.5 -9% | 3.6 -13% | 5.9 -84% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.4 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.04 108% |
CCT | 6142 106% | 6526 100% | 6123 106% | 7289 89% | 6022 108% | 7618 85% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
20% | 77% /
88% | 2% /
-5% | 5% /
-3% | 15% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
联想宣传的是预校准的显示器,因此我们的X-Rite色度计显示出相当好的平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值,分别只有3.2和2.07。尽管如此,我们能够通过自己进一步校准显示器获得更好的结果;平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值将分别低至1.1和0.63。我们免费校准的ICM配置文件在上面供用户下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.5 ms rise | |
↘ 14.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.8 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
只有在阴凉处,户外的能见度才算不错。400尼特的背光亮度不够,无法克服玻璃屏幕的大部分眩光。
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过联想Vantage将我们的设备设置为极限性能模式,并通过Windows设置为性能模式。此外,我们确保通过Nvidia控制面板启用独立GPU模式。该系统支持MUX或Advanced Optimus,尽管它在技术上不是一台游戏笔记本电脑。
处理器--与酷睿i7相差无几
多线程性能比我们数据库中配备相同设备的普通笔记本电脑慢5%左右。 Ryzen 9 6900HSCPU。这种差距可能很小,但它足以使我们的AMD CPU落后于 酷睿i7-12700H英特尔Slim 7i Pro X中的酷睿i7-12700H落后约5%至10%。
配置下来,较慢的 Ryzen 7 6800HSKU,根据我们对Ryzen 9 6900HS的体验,预计会对性能再产生5%到10%的影响。华硕ROG Zephyrus G14.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (14212 - 16072, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (90523 - 102881, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (3035 - 3614, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (97461 - 105203, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (12548 - 13039, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (49657 - 56486, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (51791 - 142686, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (737 - 888, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (7530 - 8981, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25757 - 30291, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 |
系统性能
PCMark 10的结果一直落后于英特尔Slim 7i Pro X,平均约为10%。这可能是由于与我们的Ryzen CPU相比,英特尔的CPU速度更快,正如上面的基准测试所显示的。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6231 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (49150 - 51517, n=5) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (43646 - 51838, n=5) | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (15975 - 55235, n=5) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (79.2 - 110.9, n=5) | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon揭示了在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。此外,在60 FPS下的4K视频播放并不完美,甚至在多次重测后还有一些掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 | |
MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 只有一个驱动器
我们的测试设备配备了一个1TB 三星PM9A1PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD,而不是英特尔Slim 7 X Pro上的Micron 3400。尽管如此,我们可以再次观察到性能节流,如下图所示。最大传输率将稳定在6600MB/s左右,只有一分钟左右的时间,然后下降到3300MB/s,表明散热不足。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 55 WGeForce RTX 3050 GPU
的 移动GeForce RTX 3050根据3DMark,我们的设备与英特尔Slim 7i Pro X中的相同GPU相比,性能在个位数百分比之内。尽管如此,在运行《GTA V》或《最终幻想15》等实际游戏时,英特尔版本领先5-15%,这可能是由于Core i7-12700H CPU稍快。在游戏时,你肯定会从英特尔Slim 7i Pro X中挤出更多的性能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 15683 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 42159 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10654 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4779 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 165.1 | 159.4 | 112.7 | 54.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 224.1 | 132.8 | 80.6 | 44 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 124.9 | 112.2 | 111.4 | 104.8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 108.1 | 54.9 | 39.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 96.5 | 84.3 | 67.1 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 248 | 115.2 | 92.8 | 80.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 57.3 | 45.9 | 34.2 | 27.5 |
排放
系统噪音
风扇噪音取决于联想的三种电源配置。极限性能、智能冷却和节省电池。在智能冷却模式下浏览网页或流媒体视频时,双内部风扇通常非常安静。在这种情况下,风扇噪音约为24至26分贝(A),而静音背景为23分贝(A)。
运行更高的负载,如3DMark 06,在第一个基准场景之后,风扇噪音会达到37.4 dB(A)。如果循环运行该场景,风扇噪音将稳定在近42分贝(A)。如果是游戏,风扇噪音可能在42至48 dB(A)之间,这与我们在英特尔型号上观察到的情况接近。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 37.4 / 47.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1280P, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -11% | -2% | -8% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 24.6 -6% | 26 -12% | 26 -12% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 24.6 -6% | 26 -12% | 26 -12% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23.3 | 24.6 -6% | 26 -12% | 27 -16% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.3 | 24.6 -6% | 28.2 -21% | 31 -33% | 23.2 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
Load Average * | 37.4 | 45.1 -21% | 43.6 -17% | 32 14% | 47.5 -27% | 24 36% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.7 | 49.1 -18% | 33 21% | 51.7 -24% | 35.6 15% | |
Load Maximum * | 47.7 | 50.4 -6% | 43.5 9% | 36 25% | 51.7 -8% | 55.8 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
温度 - 暖手器
由于超薄的外形、H系列CPU和独立的GeForce RTX GPU的组合,表面温度可能相当高。当处于负载状态时,顶部和底部的热点可以分别达到42摄氏度和50摄氏度,而戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420的温度仅为40摄氏度和37摄氏度。戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420在类似条件下,只有40℃和37℃。联想的热点在笔记本的键盘中心和后部,手掌和皮肤不太可能长时间接触。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.6 °C / -1.1 F).
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 Intel Core i7-1280P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | -1% | 5% | 11% | 16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.6 | 48 -15% | 42.8 -3% | 41 1% | 40 4% | 44.2 -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.2 | 50.2 -2% | 41.8 15% | 43 13% | 36.4 26% | 45.8 7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.8 | 27.7 7% | 32.7 -10% | 29 3% | 27 9% | 19.6 34% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.2 | 30.1 4% | 32.6 -4% | 30 4% | 29.2 6% | 22 29% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在Prime95压力下,CPU时钟速率和电路板功耗将分别提升到4.1 GHz和65 W,持续10秒左右。然后,处理器将最终稳定在3.8 GHz和54 W,以保持88 C的核心Tctl/Tdie温度。因此,由于温度限制,Slim 7 Pro X的最大提升时钟速率是短暂的。在配备酷睿i7-12700H的戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420上进行同样的测试,相比之下,稳定的核心温度为80 C。
运行时的GPU时钟速率、温度和耗电量 Witcher 3将分别稳定在1492兆赫、78摄氏度和49瓦,而上述戴尔机型则为1590兆赫、74摄氏度和50瓦。联想的处理器在负载下运行时温度较高,这部分解释了上述测量的整体表面温度较高。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 43 | 40 |
Prime95压力 | 3.7 | -- | 88 | 60 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.1 | 1207 | 77 | 78 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 1.9 | 1492 | 77 | 78 |
发言人
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
尽管我们的Ryzen 9 CPU比Core i7-12700H慢,但在运行要求不高的负载时,总体功耗比Intel Slim 7 Pro X略高。否则,当运行更高的负载(如游戏)时,该系统也同样需要使用小型(约10.7 x 5.6 x 2.7厘米)100瓦交流适配器的80至90瓦。有趣的是,消耗量明显低于戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420,可能是因为后者配备了更高容量的130 W交流适配器,用于更高的功率上限。
Off / Standby | 0.42 / 0.64 Watt |
Idle | 7.4 / 11 / 15 Watt |
Load |
81.6 / 105.6 Watt |
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2240x1400, 14.00 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | -9% | 46% | -13% | 29% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.4 | 7.1 4% | 11.8 -59% | 4 46% | 6.3 15% | 5.4 27% |
Idle Average * | 11 | 10.8 2% | 17.4 -58% | 5 55% | 10.3 6% | 9.5 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 15 | 11.6 23% | 22.4 -49% | 9 40% | 20 -33% | 12.4 17% |
Load Average * | 81.6 | 84.8 -4% | 53 35% | 35 57% | 106.2 -30% | 54.7 33% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 90 | 91.3 -1% | 52.6 42% | 38.7 57% | 96.1 -7% | 52 42% |
Load Maximum * | 105.6 | 100.8 5% | 71 33% | 87 18% | 136.5 -29% | 63.4 40% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命 - 稍微短一些
WLAN的运行时间比英特尔的版本短了大约一个小时,尽管它们的电池容量相似,都是70Wh。竞争对手戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420的运行时间也更长,超过7小时,而联想的运行时间为6小时,尽管戴尔的电池容量较小,为64Wh。
从空电到满电需要不到90分钟。请注意,如果运行游戏等高要求的负载,充电速度会变慢,因为100瓦的交流适配器对CPU和GPU来说都是勉强够用。
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7 R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 9 14IAP7 i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | HP Envy 14-eb0252ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63.3 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 64 Wh | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 24% | 20% | 126% | 23% | 41% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 351 | 434 24% | 422 20% | 792 126% | 432 23% | 494 41% |
H.264 | 532 | 504 | ||||
Load | 92 | 94 | 54 | 114 | ||
Reader / Idle | 712 | 1324 |
Pros
Cons
结论--针对价格、便携性和性能进行了优化
的 英特尔版本这款笔记本电脑包括更快的无线局域网,稍快的性能,更长的电池寿命,以及支持Thunderbolt 4。它的售价也比AMD版本高得多,为400至500美元。如果这些功能对你来说并不重要,那么价格较低的AMD版本就足够了,特别是它仍然提供同样高质量的3K触摸屏和GeForce RTX 3050图形。
Slim 7 Pro X是那些希望拥有超极本外形、H系列性能和专用RTX显卡的用户的理想选择,其价格仅超过1100美元。
当与流行的 华硕Vivobook 14系列相比,联想的机型缺乏OLED选项,但尽管它的外形更薄,但机箱有更强、更高级的感觉。经常旅行的内容创作者和编辑将最欣赏实惠的Slim 7 Pro X的平衡性能和便携性。
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7
-
04/16/2023 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.