Notebookcheck Logo

华硕VivoBook 15 Pro OLED回顾。负担得起的多媒体笔记本电脑,性能高

强大的冷却和1080p OLED。 通过新的VivoBook 15 Pro,华硕提出了一个经济实惠的多媒体笔记本电脑,将快速的Ryzen处理器与GeForce RTX 3050相结合。此外,明亮的1080p OLED显示屏以发光和充满活力的图像给人留下深刻印象。
AMD Cezanne (Zen 3) Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

通过新的VivoBook Pro型号,华硕提供了具有良好性价比的多媒体笔记本电脑,现在还可以选择配备1080p OLED显示屏。用户可以选择AMD和英特尔的CPU,以及集成GPU或Nvidia的专用显卡。我们的测试装置结合了目前的 Ryzen 5 5600H处理器与专用的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050GPU和16GB的内存。此外,还有一个512GB PCIe SSD和可选的1080p OLED显示屏。我们的具体配置是不含Windows的Campus机型,售价999欧元(约1155美元),但普通客户将为该机型(包括Windows)支付1199欧元(约1387美元)。

Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H 6 x 3.3 - 4.2 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1125 MHz, Memory: 1375 MHz, 50 W TDP, GDDR6, 472.12, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel, onboard
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, ATNA56YX03-0, AMOLED, Samsung SDC4161, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N, 512 GB 
, 446 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/VanGogh/Cezanne - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD
Networking
MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 359.8 x 235.3
Battery
63 Wh, 5260 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 120W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.672 kg, Power Supply: 446 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.9 %
11/2021
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
1.7 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.7 %
10/2021
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.2 %
10/2021
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.2 %
07/2021
HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
1.7 kg17.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.1 %
09/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2 kg17.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
09/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160

外壳 - VivoBook Pro使用塑料

VivoBook 15 Pro相对较低的入门级价格在塑料外壳上变得很明显。虽然它在视觉上看起来不错,而且我们也喜欢我们的测试单元的颜色(安静的蓝色),但你可以注意到与金属外壳的区别,如(明显更昂贵的)戴尔XPS 15稳定性和触觉方面的区别。掌托可以被压下去一点,当打开显示器盖子时,通常会有一些吱吱作响的声音。盖子本身给人留下的印象更好。尽管它仍然可以略微翘起,但没有吱吱嘎嘎的声音,而且我们无法通过在某些地方按压来引发图像错误。另一方面,铰链的最大开启角度约为135度,可以更好地调整,因为不能避免显示器的一些反弹,例如在改变开启角度时。

两侧的边框非常小,有助于呈现出现代的外观。华硕还使用了其他设计元素,如盖子上凸起的3D标志和回车键上的条纹图案。底座不大容易沾染指纹,只有盖子需要经常清洗。

该测试装置是我们的比较组中最紧凑的,也是最轻的笔记本电脑之一,仅有1.7公斤(约3.75磅)。你还必须为充电器再增加450克(约1磅)。

Size Comparison

357.26 mm 272.11 mm 24.9 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 238 mm 22 mm 1.9 kg359.8 mm 235.3 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg360.2 mm 234 mm 17.9 mm 1.7 kg356 mm 251 mm 17.5 mm 2 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备--华硕在连接方面做了一些削减

虽然乍一看,所有重要的连接包括USB-A、USB-C和HDMI都有,但它们的标准已经过时了。USB-C连接只支持3.2 Gen 1标准,也不能用于视频输出或充电,三个USB-A连接中有两个只支持旧的2.0标准。HDMI也是过时的1.4b标准,所以它不能驱动60赫兹的外部4k显示器。即使一些机型在电源按钮中提供了指纹传感器,我们的测试装置也不包括它。

左边:2个USB 2.0
左边:2个USB 2.0
右边:3.5毫米音频,微型SD读卡器,USB-C(3.2 Gen 1),HDMI 1.4b,USB-A(3.2 Gen 1),电源
右边:3.5毫米音频,微型SD读卡器,USB-C(3.2 Gen 1),HDMI 1.4b,USB-A(3.2 Gen 1),电源

SD卡阅读器

VivoBook提供了一个microSD读卡器,但它不是特别快。使用我们的AV Pro V60 UHS-II参考卡,传输速率低于40 MB/s,这明显低于竞争对手通常达到的70-80 MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
224 MB/s +509%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)
93.3 MB/s +154%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s +120%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
  (AV PRO V60)
76.1 MB/s +107%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
66.7 MB/s +81%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
  (AV Pro V60)
36.8 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
202.8 MB/s +432%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years)
122.6 MB/s +222%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
91 MB/s +139%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
  (AV PRO V60)
87.7 MB/s +130%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77.8 MB/s +104%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
  (AV Pro V60)
38.1 MB/s

沟通

可更换的WLAN模块
可更换的WLAN模块

华硕使用了联发科的WLAN模块(MT7921,2x2),理论上可以支持快速的WLAN 6标准(802.11ax)。然而,在我们与Netgear Nighthawk RAX120参考路由器的测试中,笔记本电脑根本拒绝通过WLAN 6连接,只使用WLAN 5(802.11ac),这也是为什么传输速率仍然低于应该可能的原因。另一方面,WLAN信号很稳定,不显眼。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1482 (759min - 1594max) MBit/s +111%
Dell G15 5515
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1448 (759min - 1518max) MBit/s +106%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1368 (669min - 1440max) MBit/s +94%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1197 (1057min - 1282max) MBit/s +70%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
804 (670min - 867max) MBit/s +14%
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (548 - 985, n=16)
797 MBit/s +13%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
MediaTek MT7921
704 (365min - 738max) MBit/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (285 - 998, n=2, last 2 years)
642 MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell G15 5515
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1437 (1264min - 1567max) MBit/s +153%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1434 (1199min - 1500max) MBit/s +152%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1017 - 1675, n=2, last 2 years)
1346 MBit/s +137%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1319 (1015min - 1489max) MBit/s +132%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1318 (667min - 1344max) MBit/s +132%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
646 (604min - 699max) MBit/s +14%
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (90 - 972, n=16)
628 MBit/s +10%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
MediaTek MT7921
569 (538min - 599max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700Tooltip
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø569 (538-599)
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø692 (365-738)

网络摄像头

VivoBook的网络摄像头包括一个机械盖,有一个红点显示摄像头被锁定。正如预期的那样,720p的传感器的图像质量并不好,即使在良好的光线条件下,颜色也显得相当苍白,内容也不是很清晰。

ColorChecker
9.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
5 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062: 6.07 ∆E min: 2.05 - max: 9.38 ∆E

维护

机箱的底部用Torx螺丝(T6)固定,可以很容易地拆下来。但由于VivoBook 15 Pro的工作存储器是焊接在一起的,所以维修选项仅限于SSD的M.2-2280插槽和WLAN模块。你也可以清洁风扇。

VivoBook 15 Pro的内部结构
VivoBook 15 Pro的内部结构

输入设备 - 一个带数字键盘的键盘

华硕在VivoBook 15 Pro中使用了一个键程为1.35毫米的键盘,右侧有专门的数字块。打字体验很好,在字母键上打字也很舒服安静。只有较大的按键,如回车键和空格键,才会有一点响声。遗憾的是,回车键只占一排,它延续了显示屏盖子上的凹槽图案,这使它很容易感觉到。对于黑暗的环境,还有一个白色背景照明,可以分三步调整。

ClickPad具有良好的滑动特性,13 x 7.5厘米(约5.1 x 3英寸)的宽度非常大。在测试过程中,我们没有遇到任何问题,鼠标控制工作得很完美。与这个价格范围内的其他笔记本电脑一样,只有点击的声音相当大。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

显示屏 - 三星的1080p AMOLED

子像素网格
子像素网格
视角稳定
视角稳定

华硕在我们的测试装置中使用了15.6英寸的三星AMOLED显示屏,分辨率为1920 x 1080像素(全高清),但也提供普通的IPS面板。由于低黑值及其产生的极高对比度,OLED面板的主观图像质量非常好。与普通IPS面板相比,黑色显得非常黑,颜色也非常鲜艳。与采用IPS显示屏的竞争对手相比,VivoBook 15 Pro在这里具有真正的优势。

在我们用CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2进行的分析中,标有 "SDC4161 "的面板在整个过程中实现了近400cd/m²的亮度,只有很低的变化。在99%的情况下,亮度分布几乎是完美的。这些数值甚至高于XPS 15中的OLED面板的数值。 XPS 15中的OLED面板。.视角的稳定性也很好。虽然你可以从一些特定角度看到轻微的蓝色色调,但这对OLED面板来说是正常的。

OLED显示屏的另一个优点是响应速度极快,这也使其非常适用于游戏。然而,即使是这种面板也不是完全没有问题的,因为我们能够在60%或更低的亮度下开始测量PWM,频率仅为60赫兹。这可能会给一些用户带来问题。

为了防止图像内容被烧毁,华硕提供了一些功能,如像素转移,这在实践中并不明显。任务栏可以自动隐藏,屏幕保护程序默认在30分钟后启动。所有这些设置都可以在预装的MyAsus应用程序中停用。

401
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA56YX03-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 401 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 396.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 396 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.8
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
ATNA56YX03-0, AMOLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell G15 5515
BOE092A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Chi Mei CMN1523, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
Display
-54%
-24%
-49%
-18%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.9
39.1
-61%
64.6
-35%
42.9
-57%
71
-29%
99.9
0%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
56.9
-43%
95.3
-5%
64
-36%
99
-1%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
95.8
40.4
-58%
66.5
-31%
44.4
-54%
73.3
-23%
98.1
2%
Response Times
-294%
-319%
14123%
13580%
-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
3.2 ?(1.6, 1.6)
25.2 ?(12.4, 12.8)
-688%
18 ?(9.2, 8.8)
-463%
22.8 ?(10, 12.8)
-613%
16.4 ?(6.4, 10)
-413%
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
-13%
Response Time Black / White *
3.2 ?(1.6, 1.6)
16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6)
-425%
8.8 ?(3.6, 5.2)
-175%
23.6 ?(13.6, 10)
-638%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
-175%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
12%
PWM Frequency
60.2 ?(60)
200 ?(99)
232%
26320 ?(43)
43621%
24940 ?(50)
41329%
59.5 ?(99)
-1%
Screen
-135%
-18%
-115%
-37%
-13%
Brightness middle
396
278
-30%
418
6%
294.3
-26%
395
0%
362
-9%
Brightness
397
262
-34%
376
-5%
251
-37%
375
-6%
367
-8%
Brightness Distribution
99
83
-16%
83
-16%
76
-23%
90
-9%
97
-2%
Black Level *
0.36
0.41
0.26
0.32
0.06
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2
5.74
-187%
1.67
16%
4.08
-104%
2.6
-30%
2.1
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.8
19.63
-309%
3.88
19%
19.49
-306%
5.4
-13%
4.1
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.8
4.7
-161%
0.98
46%
3.7
-106%
1.1
39%
2.5
-39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1
3.1
-210%
2.9
-190%
3
-200%
3.4
-240%
1.4
-40%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.011 109%
2.26 97%
2.21 100%
2.12 104%
2.18 101%
CCT
6608 98%
6207 105%
6209 105%
6616 98%
6140 106%
6608 98%
Contrast
772
1020
1132
1234
6033
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-161% / -153%
-120% / -69%
4653% / 3186%
4508% / 3110%
-4% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度(DCI P3目标色彩空间
CalMAN灰度(DCI P3目标色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度(DCI P3目标色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度(DCI P3目标色彩空间
CalMAN ColorChecker(DCI P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(DCI P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN 灰度校准(DCI P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN 灰度校准(DCI P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN 饱和度校准(DCI P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN 饱和度校准(DCI P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(DCI P3目标色彩空间)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(DCI P3目标色彩空间)。

在交付状态下,面板已经被调整得很好,没有彩色的色调。与DCI P3参考色彩空间相比,色彩偏差非常低。通过校准(上面有免费下载的配置文件),我们能够进一步改善DeltaE 2000的偏差(尽管青色的异常值仍然存在),但这并不是真正必要的。 由于DCI P3色彩空间的完整覆盖,视频和图像处理也可以在这个设备上进行。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI P3
vs. DCI P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60.2 Hz ≤ 60 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

显示屏表面具有高度反射性,这也影响了在明亮环境中使用该设备。在明亮的阳光下,你很难在户外使用该设备,因为持续的反射会成为一种障碍。

在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下

性能--AMD Ryzen遇到GeForce RTX

我们的VivoBook 15 Pro测试单元使用的是目前的AMDRyzen 5000处理器(45瓦级),并结合专用的 GeForce RTX-3050图形卡从Nvidia。MyAsus应用程序提供各种性能配置文件,对处理器和显卡的性能都有影响。

TDP/TGP-Werte in den verschiedenen Leistungsmodi
性能模式 CPU负载 GPU负载 CPU/GPU综合负载
低声模式 65W->45W 35W CPU。15W, GPU:35W
标准模式 65W -> 54W 40W CPU: 25W, GPU:40W
性能模式 65W->54W 50W CPU。35W, GPU:50W

一般来说,我们使用预设的标准模式运行以下基准和测量。然而,在某些类别中,我们也看了其他两种模式的效果。特别是耳语模式对于日常工作甚至游戏来说可能真的很有趣,但后面会有更多的内容。

处理器 - Ryzen 5 5600H (Zen 3)

华硕使用目前的AMD Ryzen 5 5600H具有6个核心(12个线程)的处理器。由于高TDP值,它提供了非常好的性能,在标准以及性能模式下,即使在持续负载下,性能也保持稳定。正如预期的那样,配备8核CPU的竞争者具有优势,但由于其在较长负荷下的性能发展不佳,所以 XPS 15甚至没有领先那么多。总的来说,Ryzen 5的性能在大多数情况下是完全足够的,即使是更苛刻的任务。

VivoBook 15 Pro的英特尔型号使用的是 酷睿i7-11370H4个核心(8个线程),我们已经在MateBook 14s中用类似的TDP值进行了测试。MateBook 14s.在多核测试中,i7最终落后Ryzen 5约30%,但在单核测试中,它的优势略高于10%。由于Ryzen处理器采用现代7纳米制造工艺,效率更高,因此总体上是更好的选择。

在电池运行中,CPU的性能被限制在30瓦左右(即使在可选的性能模式下),但这只在多核测试中变得很明显,下降了约15%。你可以找到更多的CPU基准测试 这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H; Performance Mode: Ø1495 (1487.93-1521.72)
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H; Standard: Ø1463 (1457.89-1472.1)
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H; Quiet Mode: Ø1224 (1166.35-1434.93)
Dell G15 5515 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1955 (1938.74-1967.83)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1723 (1688.33-1770.15)
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø725 (618.81-762.14)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1945 (1923.82-1971.51)
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø1038 (1027.19-1054.52)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
Cinebench R15多循环CPU数据(红色:性能模式,蓝色:标准,绿色:耳语模式)。
Cinebench R15多循环CPU数据(红色:性能模式,蓝色:标准,绿色:耳语模式)。
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia
 
87.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
75 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
73 pt
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
72.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
72.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
 
67.1 pt
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
66.6 pt
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
60.5 pt
HP Pavilion 15-eg -2!
Intel Core i7-1165G7
50.8 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years)
14189 Points +55%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11912 Points +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11727 Points +28%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
10816 Points +18%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
10531 Points +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (7945 - 10416, n=13)
9466 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
9166 Points
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
6612 Points -28%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4947 (4868.64min - 4947.48max) Points -46%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years)
1713 Points +28%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1518 Points +13%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1498 Points +12%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1495 Points +11%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1417 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1390 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1386 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (1316 - 1381, n=13)
1363 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1343 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)
5352 Points +49%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4588 Points +28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4575 Points +28%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
4307 Points +20%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
3848 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (3074 - 4059, n=16)
3678 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
3582 Points
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
2578 Points -28%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1908 Points -47%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)
646 Points +22%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
590 Points +11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points +9%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
575 Points +8%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
554 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
542 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
536 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (527 - 538, n=15)
533 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
531 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)
2321 Points +52%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H (Ultra Performance)
2024 Points +33%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2010 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1972 (1923.82min - 1971.51max) Points +30%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1968 Points +29%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1770 (1688.33min - 1770.15max) Points +16%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (1319 - 1723, n=16)
1562 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (Performance Mode)
1522 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (Standard)
1466 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (Quiet Mode)
1435 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1055 (1027.19min - 1054.52max) Points -31%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
762 (618.81min - 762.14max) Points -50%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)
251 Points +13%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points +4%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points +3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
224 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
223 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (218 - 225, n=14)
222 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
221 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
210 Points -6%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
603 Seconds * -82%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
461 Seconds * -39%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
332 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (300 - 384, n=14)
326 Seconds * +2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
298 Seconds * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
278 Seconds * +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)
265 Seconds * +20%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
260 Seconds * +22%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
259 Seconds * +22%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia
  (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)
57411 MIPS +33%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53762 MIPS +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
52444 MIPS +22%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47642 MIPS +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (36315 - 46562, n=14)
43438 MIPS +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
43065 MIPS
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
42570 MIPS -1%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
28520 MIPS -34%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22655 MIPS -47%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)
5639 MIPS +4%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5538 MIPS +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
5439 MIPS
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
5427 MIPS 0%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5416 MIPS 0%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
5352 MIPS -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (5213 - 5446, n=14)
5350 MIPS -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5292 MIPS -3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
5164 MIPS -5%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)
11372 Points +79%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
9073 Points +43%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
8164 Points +28%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7441 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7438 Points +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (4990 - 7253, n=14)
6521 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
6364 Points
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
5985 Points -6%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)
1758 Points +23%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1588 Points +11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1540 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1480 Points +4%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1453 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1431 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1429 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (1365 - 1445, n=14)
1412 Points -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)
15.6 fps +36%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.3 fps +24%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13.8 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.7 fps +19%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.4 fps +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (9.92 - 13.3, n=14)
12 fps +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
11.5 fps
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
8.51 fps -26%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.59 fps -43%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
107 s * -100%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (52.2 - 81.5, n=14)
58.7 s * -10%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
53.6 s *
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)
48 s * +10%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
47.4 s * +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.3 s * +12%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * +14%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
43.8 s * +18%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.601 sec * -13%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.567 sec * -6%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.56 sec * -5%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.549 sec * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.544 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (0.526 - 0.596, n=14)
0.541 sec * -2%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
0.533 sec *
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)
0.4811 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
223 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
148.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1522 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
92.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
86.4 pt
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
72.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
 
72.7 pt
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
48.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14048 KRay/s +28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
13362 KRay/s +22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years)
12788 KRay/s +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (9181 - 12636, n=14)
11351 KRay/s +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
10946 KRay/s
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
6344 KRay/s -42%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
88152 Points +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
87855 Points +28%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (51994 - 78250, n=14)
69168 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
68549 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years)
65480 Points -4%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
27167 Points -60%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Multimedia
  (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years)
3047 MB/s +30%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
3016 MB/s +28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3014 MB/s +28%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
2350 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (1587 - 2675, n=14)
2332 MB/s -1%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
1838 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
95763 Points +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
95279 Points +29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years)
92085 Points +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (66699 - 77213, n=14)
74600 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
74015 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
50460 Points -32%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
11770 Points +36%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
11505 Points +33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years)
9055 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (8340 - 9159, n=14)
8787 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
8649 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
4374 Points -49%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
48518 Points +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
48351 Points +28%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (28268 - 43274, n=14)
38073 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
37739 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years)
33558 Points -11%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
16576 Points -56%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
119062 MB/s +30%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
118674 MB/s +30%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
91509 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years)
76070 MB/s -17%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (39852 - 98939, n=14)
75379 MB/s -18%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
63944 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Multimedia
  (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years)
868 MB/s +46%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
781 MB/s +31%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
772 MB/s +30%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (507 - 649, n=14)
601 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
596 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
319 MB/s -46%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
7407 KRay/s +29%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7399 KRay/s +28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years)
6829 KRay/s +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (4811 - 6652, n=14)
5982 KRay/s +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
5764 KRay/s
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
3502 KRay/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years)
36824 MPixel/s +130%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
31380 MPixel/s +96%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (7419 - 24746, n=14)
17081 MPixel/s +7%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
16014 MPixel/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
15200 MPixel/s -5%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
15107 MPixel/s -6%

系统性能

正如你所期望的那样,VivoBook 15 Pro拥有快速的组件,是一个反应非常迅速的系统,这也被合成基准测试所证实。从AMD iGPU到Nvidia GPU的自动图形切换也没有问题或停顿。新的Windows 11可以安装在VivoBook 15 Pro上。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)
6602 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6478 Points +10%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
6098 Points +3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6019 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
5905 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
5862 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (5748 - 5905, n=2)
5827 Points -1%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5814 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)
10473 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10171 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10001 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
9987 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9833 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (9372 - 9987, n=2)
9680 Points -3%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
9631 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9490 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9292 Points +8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)
8709 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8639 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
8627 Points
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
8625 Points 0%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8344 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (7975 - 8627, n=2)
8301 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8218 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)
8686 Points +34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8399 Points +29%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7475 Points +15%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
7408 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (6486 - 6897, n=2)
6692 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6650 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
6486 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5839 Points -10%
PCMark 10 Score
5905 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia
  (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years)
61455 MB/s +59%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
40472 MB/s +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
38646 MB/s 0%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
38595 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
38540 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (20549 - 42141, n=14)
37145 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years)
60555 MB/s +36%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
47539 MB/s +7%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
44470 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
44396 MB/s 0%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
43850 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (22917 - 47595, n=14)
42445 MB/s -5%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years)
63628 MB/s +75%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
46806 MB/s +29%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (20226 - 44872, n=14)
36396 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
36270 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
35625 MB/s -2%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
34820 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia
  (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years)
102.3 ns * -36%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
79.5 ns * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  (75 - 89.1, n=14)
79 ns * -5%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
78.3 ns * -4%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
75.2 ns *
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
69 ns * +8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中,在上网、YouTube 4K视频再现和CPU负载方面,VivoBook 15 Pro没有显示出任何限制,这使得它也适合实时音频应用。

LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
2084 μs * -365%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1914 μs * -328%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
655 μs * -46%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
648 μs * -45%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
564 μs * -26%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
447.7 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

M.2-2280固态硬盘可以被替换。
M.2-2280固态硬盘可以被替换。

VivoBook 15 Pro提供一个M.2-2280插槽,通过PCIe 3.0 x4连接。我们的测试装置配备了SK Hynik BC711。这提供了512GB的存储容量,其中446GB在第一次启动系统后仍可供用户使用。在基准测试中,存储性能非常好,我们预计不会出现任何问题。你可以找到更多的SSD基准测试这里.

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
84.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
84.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
81.5 pt
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
 
66.1 pt
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
53 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
51.8 pt
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
50.8 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
46.1 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Multimedia
  (756 - 4861, n=87, last 2 years)
2872 MB/s +40%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2648 (2638.43min - 2648.49max) MB/s +29%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2052 (1985.36min - 2051.76max) MB/s
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (1914 - 2087, n=4)
2012 MB/s -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1877 (1850.74min - 1877.16max) MB/s -9%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1873 (1707.98min - 1872.94max) MB/s -9%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1204 (1190.48min - 1203.56max) MB/s -41%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
936 (845.35min - 935.97max) MB/s -54%
seq write
Average of class Multimedia
  (790 - 5709, n=87, last 2 years)
2977 MB/s +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2885 (2677.74min - 2884.84max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2820 (2814.8min - 2820.25max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2162 (1233.54min - 2162.24max) MB/s -25%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (1762 - 2885, n=4)
2102 MB/s -27%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2094 (2014.52min - 2093.59max) MB/s -27%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1620 (1315.87min - 1620.14max) MB/s -44%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1285 (1262.06min - 1284.72max) MB/s -55%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia
  (1023 - 7121, n=87, last 2 years)
5217 MB/s +45%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
3601 (1997.96min - 3600.81max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3554 (3305.84min - 3554.04max) MB/s -1%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (3463 - 3601, n=4)
3550 MB/s -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3224 (2977.45min - 3223.74max) MB/s -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3180 (2895.54min - 3179.63max) MB/s -12%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
2971 (2662.21min - 2971.11max) MB/s -17%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1896 (1728.26min - 1896.24max) MB/s -47%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia
  (871 - 6761, n=87, last 2 years)
3947 MB/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3318 (3298.4min - 3318.4max) MB/s +11%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2980 (2751.88min - 2980.38max) MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2869 (2808.3min - 2869.32max) MB/s -4%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (2600 - 2980, n=4)
2849 MB/s -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2429 (477.41min - 2429.31max) MB/s -18%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1745 (1716.18min - 1745.18max) MB/s -41%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1473 (1467.38min - 1472.83max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 149.1, n=87, last 2 years)
64.5 MB/s +11%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
58.1 (58.04min - 58.14max) MB/s
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (45 - 58.1, n=4)
52.8 MB/s -9%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
46.4 (46.33min - 46.44max) MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
42.1 (42min - 42.06max) MB/s -28%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
41.9 (40.83min - 41.93max) MB/s -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
39.4 (11.16min - 39.35max) MB/s -32%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
29 (20.95min - 28.96max) MB/s -50%
4k q1 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia
  (80.9 - 378, n=87, last 2 years)
178.7 MB/s +45%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
146 (141.02min - 146.01max) MB/s +19%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
123 (122.83min - 123.2max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
122 (120.46min - 122.47max) MB/s -1%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (108.9 - 129.9, n=4)
118.6 MB/s -4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
112 (108.82min - 112.38max) MB/s -9%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
104 (103.47min - 103.94max) MB/s -15%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
93.4 (93.15min - 93.37max) MB/s -24%
4k q32 t16 read
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2227 (2222.18min - 2226.53max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1887 (1882.56min - 1887.17max) MB/s -15%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1362 (1077.22min - 1361.69max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (416 - 4358, n=87, last 2 years)
1350 MB/s -39%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (328 - 2227, n=4)
1042 MB/s -53%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
730 (635.76min - 729.62max) MB/s -67%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
720 (687.45min - 719.86max) MB/s -68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
271 (247.51min - 271.06max) MB/s -88%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2668 (2657.73min - 2668.24max) MB/s +14%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2331 (2324.12min - 2330.72max) MB/s
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1078 (929.48min - 1077.95max) MB/s -54%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=87, last 2 years)
1067 MB/s -54%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (192.2 - 2331, n=4)
840 MB/s -64%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
538 (518.2min - 538.25max) MB/s -77%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
438 (405.4min - 437.99max) MB/s -81%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
422 (416.05min - 421.67max) MB/s -82%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6452 Points +9%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
5913 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (2010 - 9972, n=84, last 2 years)
5067 Points -14%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (3446 - 5913, n=4)
4126 Points -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3797 Points -36%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
3522 Points -40%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
3149 Points -47%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2160 Points -63%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2437 Points +8%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2252 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=84, last 2 years)
1695 Points -25%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1566 Points -30%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (1025 - 2252, n=4)
1430 Points -37%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1348 Points -40%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1075 Points -52%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
545 Points -76%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2797 Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (545 - 4813, n=84, last 2 years)
2567 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2524 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2220 Points -12%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (1497 - 2524, n=4)
1997 Points -21%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1319 Points -48%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1192 Points -53%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1155 Points -54%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (1192 - 5730, n=84, last 2 years)
4005 MB/s +27%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
3142 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2988 MB/s -5%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (2088 - 3142, n=4)
2660 MB/s -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2643 MB/s -16%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
2555 MB/s -19%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
2030 MB/s -35%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1362 MB/s -57%
Seq Write
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2806 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (388 - 5175, n=84, last 2 years)
2553 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2541 MB/s -9%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1791 MB/s -36%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (1311 - 2806, n=4)
1778 MB/s -37%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1510 MB/s -46%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1440 MB/s -49%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1003 MB/s -64%
4K Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (30 - 98.5, n=84, last 2 years)
62.7 MB/s +15%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (48.5 - 60, n=4)
55.3 MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
54.4 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
46.74 MB/s -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
42.86 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
42.82 MB/s -21%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
38.43 MB/s -29%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
37.8 MB/s -31%
4K Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=84, last 2 years)
188.5 MB/s +51%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
164.2 MB/s +31%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (120.6 - 176.8, n=4)
137.7 MB/s +10%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
125 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
121.4 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
87 MB/s -30%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
86.7 MB/s -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
85.5 MB/s -32%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2096 MB/s +11%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1884 MB/s
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1273 MB/s -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (413 - 2989, n=84, last 2 years)
1231 MB/s -35%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (696 - 1884, n=4)
1109 MB/s -41%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1098 MB/s -42%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
768 MB/s -59%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
370.5 MB/s -80%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2455 MB/s +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (281 - 4265, n=84, last 2 years)
2123 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2118 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1983 MB/s -6%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (1238 - 2118, n=4)
1681 MB/s -21%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1054 MB/s -50%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
926 MB/s -56%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
891 MB/s -58%
Access Time Read
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
0.164 ms * -413%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.103 ms * -222%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
0.068 ms * -113%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.168, n=84, last 2 years)
0.0578 ms * -81%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
0.053 ms * -66%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.042 ms * -31%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (0.032 - 0.051, n=4)
0.042 ms * -31%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
0.032 ms *
Access Time Write
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.135 ms * -335%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.101 ms * -226%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
0.062 ms * -100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=84, last 2 years)
0.05992 ms * -93%
Average SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
  (0.028 - 0.088, n=4)
0.0445 ms * -44%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
0.044 ms * -42%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
0.043 ms * -39%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
0.031 ms *

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3603 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2976 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 529 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 471.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 64.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 148.3 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1986 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2077 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU性能

GPU-Z Radeon RX Vega 6
GPU-Z Radeon RX Vega 6
gpu-zGeForce rtx 3050
gpu-zGeForce rtx 3050

在日常操作中,图形输出通常由集成的 Radeon RX Vega 6处理器处理,它的视频解码器非常高效,特别能打分。一旦你需要更多的图形性能(例如用于游戏),它就会自动切换到专用的GeForce RTX 3050.根据不同的性能模式,GPU运行时使用35瓦,最高为50瓦,所以总体而言,这款GPU的性能范围处于中下水平,最大允许使用80瓦。各种模式之间的性能差异约为10%。

耳语模式 标准模式 性能模式
3DMarkFire Strike GPU 9,728分 10,497分 11,635分

在性能模式下,VivoBook 15 Pro非常接近于 RTX 3050 TiXPS 15,这确实应该更快。它也明显领先于旧的 GeForce GTX 1650中的IdeaPad 5 Pro 16.图形性能在所有三种性能模式下都很稳定,即使是在恒定负载下。

与处理器一样,图形性能在电池操作中被限制在30瓦,即使在可选的性能模式下也是如此。这相当于在主电源操作中,与标准模式相比,减少了约20%。你可以找到更多的GPU基准测试 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
99.2 pt
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
95.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
86.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
 
77.7 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
73.2 pt
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
70.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH -1!
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
55.6 pt
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
34.4 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
19867 Points +46%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
19746 Points +45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years)
18929 Points +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (11980 - 18557, n=22)
15711 Points +15%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
15387 Points +13%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
13643 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11470 Points -16%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
8204 Points -40%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
91295 Points +37%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
75563 Points +13%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
66589 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (33426 - 87403, n=17)
65657 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 150699, n=60, last 2 years)
58293 Points -12%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
48479 Points -27%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
27532 Points -59%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
14696 Points +40%
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14518 Points +38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=90, last 2 years)
14005 Points +33%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
12119 Points +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (9138 - 14157, n=20)
11915 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
10497 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8287 Points -21%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4753 Points -55%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Dell G15 5515
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5751 Points +46%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
5594 Points +42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=90, last 2 years)
5310 Points +35%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
4591 Points +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (3281 - 5295, n=21)
4517 Points +15%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
3931 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
3038 Points -23%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1945 Points -51%
3DMark 11 Performance
13203 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30830 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9485 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4118 points
Help

游戏性能

Ryzen CPU和RTX 3050的组合 RTX 3050提供了一个体面的游戏性能,许多游戏即使在最大的细节设置下仍能在原生全高清分辨率下顺利运行。只有在要求非常高的游戏中,如"赛博朋克2077"如果你想看到一个合理流畅的游戏,你必须减少细节。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
56.6 (13.2min, 25.5P0.1, 43.4P1) fps +36%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
56 (46min) fps +34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)
50.6 fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (31.5 - 55.8, n=21)
45.2 fps +8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (BIOS 1.4 Ultra Performance)
43.7 (32min, 34P1) fps +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (BIOS 1.4)
37.1 (33min, 35P1) fps -11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (BIOS 1.3.2 Ultra Performance)
36.2 (31min, 32P1) fps -13%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (BIOS 1.3.2)
34.3 (30min, 31P1) fps -18%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (Performance Mode)
41.7 (39min, 40P1) fps
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (Standard)
37.9 (36min, 36P1) fps -9%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (Quiet Mode)
35 (33min, 33P1) fps -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
32.7 (26min) fps -22%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
23.6 (21min) fps -43%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
74.5 (24.4min, 50P1) fps +34%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
71.8 (21.9min, 52.6P1) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (48 - 72.5, n=20)
60.4 fps +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
57.2 (7.15min, 31.3P1) fps +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years)
56.3 fps +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
55.5 (6.48min, 35.7P1) fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
44.9 (6.7min, 29.4P1) fps -19%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
22.8 (2.67min, 15.4P1) fps -59%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
145 (126.1min) fps +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (82.8 - 147.7, n=20)
114.8 fps +5%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
110 (96.6min) fps +1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
109 (92.1min) fps 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
109 (96.4min) fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
108 (95min) fps -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 171.6, n=90, last 2 years)
101.6 fps -7%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
87.7 (75.1min) fps -20%
F1 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (759689)
78.4 (60min) fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (66 - 81, n=2)
73.5 fps +11%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
66 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (759689)
48.3 (38min) fps -27%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
97 (70.7min, 76P1) fps +35%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
96.4 (69.9min, 75.5P1) fps +34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=86, last 2 years)
89.9 fps +25%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
84 fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (57.9 - 95.1, n=19)
79.9 fps +11%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
72 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
49.9 (37.5min, 40.1P1) fps -31%
F1 2021 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (21.1 - 149.8, n=25, last 2 years)
73.1 fps +55%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (807588)
66.8 (55min, 54P1) fps +42%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (797778)
52.8 (45min, 44P1) fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (44.1 - 62, n=8)
52.1 fps +11%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (815237)
47.1 (38min, 37P1) fps

在所有三种性能模式下,游戏性能保持稳定,这在我们的"TheWitcher 3" 持续性能测试中很容易看到。在电池运行时,性能略有下降(32对38 FPS @Witcher 3 Ultra),但你仍然可以流畅地游戏。只有在电池水平为5%时,性能开始真正下降。你可以在我们的 "游戏 "部分找到更多的游戏基准测试。 游戏部分.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0510152025303540Tooltip
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; Performance Mode: Ø41.7 (39-44)
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; Standard: Ø37.9 (36-41)
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; Quiet Mode: Ø35 (33-37)
Witcher 3 Ultra CPU和GPU信息(性能模式:标准)。
Witcher 3 Ultra CPU和GPU信息(性能模式:标准)。
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 168 162 103 55.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 199 76 41.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 139 130 116 109
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 98.4 56.4 41.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 91.8 80.4 68
Strange Brigade (2018) 192 104 84 72
F1 2020 (2020) 183 102 87 66
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 64 37 31 26
F1 2021 (2021) 196 112 93.4 47.1
Far Cry 6 (2021) 75 57 52 45

排放--具有良好冷却效果的VivoBook

风扇噪音

两个风扇与两个热管
两个风扇与两个热管

在简单的或日常的任务中,如上网或视频复制,VivoBook 15 Pro的两个风扇通常保持完全停用,在几乎没有27 dB(A)的情况下,风扇的第一个激活水平也只能注意到非常安静的呼啸声。 然而,只要你在处理器或显卡上增加负荷,风扇就会迅速达到最大水平,这取决于性能模式,如下表所示。

性能模式 TheWitcher 3 压力测试
低音模式 33.9 dB(A) 33.9 dB(A)
标准模式 42.8 dB(A) 42.8 dB(A)
性能模式 46.3 dB(A) 48.3 dB(A)

特别是在游戏时,性能模式之间的差异非常明显,如果你有足够的性能来顺利游戏,我们总是建议使用低语模式。例如,"TheWitcher 3 ,"就是这种情况。标准模式下的噪音音量仍然可以,但在安静的场景中可能会变得很烦人,而且你应该只使用性能模式和耳机,因为否则你不会听到很多游戏的声音。我们没有注意到任何其他电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。

Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Noise
-5%
-26%
2%
-2%
9%
off / environment *
24.8
24
3%
24
3%
25.4
-2%
24.04
3%
23.8
4%
Idle Minimum *
24.8
25
-1%
25
-1%
25.6
-3%
24.04
3%
23.8
4%
Idle Average *
24.8
26
-5%
30
-21%
25.6
-3%
24.04
3%
23.8
4%
Idle Maximum *
26.4
30
-14%
43
-63%
25.6
3%
24.04
9%
23.8
10%
Load Average *
42.8
44
-3%
56
-31%
39.2
8%
41.3
4%
36
16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.8
44
-3%
56
-31%
39.1
9%
49.21
-15%
36
16%
Load Maximum *
42.8
48
-12%
58
-36%
41.5
3%
52.93
-24%
38.2
11%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
24.8 / 24.8 / 26.4 dB(A)
Load
42.8 / 42.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.138.237.836.936.92531.931.633.630.2343128.124.228.625.328.84029.230.930.53031.7502826.428.724.927.66328.928.625.225.127.18024.225.223.422.222.710021.722.224.322.420.112523.422.927.123.319.816023.122.124.221.821.220022.621.324.520.719.625021.919.526.218.618.631521.617.625.516.316.540021.715.626.213.413.450021.714.926.712.412.963023.916.728.813.613.280023.215.731.211.711.310002215.33011.510.7125022.113.629.110.810.6160022.314.630.811.912.320002213.731.111.411.4250021.913.33211.611.5315020.813.130.311.811.7400023.212.631.312.412.2500022.512.53312.412.4630019.912.633.81312.8800016.91329.513.112.91000015.312.525.712.812.51250015.112.42212.812.51600015.312.117.512.312.7SPL33.826.442.824.824.6N20.84.30.60.6median 21.9median 14.6median 28.8median 12.8median 12.7Delta1.52.43.12.32.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062

温度

VivoBook 15 Pro的表面温度完全没有理由让人担心。在日常操作中,该设备几乎没有升温,即使在负载情况下,也确实只有底部向后的中央区域有一个热点。然而,你仍然可以在你的膝盖上使用该设备,而且在游戏或负载下,键盘保持在一个舒适的温度。

在压力测试期间,性能稳定,笔记本电脑能够保持各种性能模式的相应TDP/TGP值,没有任何问题。这意味着,即使在较长时间的负载下,这里的性能也不会受到限制。

压力测试CPU和GPU数据
压力测试CPU和GPU数据
Max. Load
 36.6 °C37.8 °C33.4 °C 
 37.2 °C37.6 °C35.8 °C 
 23.6 °C23.7 °C24.3 °C 
Maximum: 37.8 °C
Average: 32.2 °C
41 °C48.4 °C42.8 °C
36.2 °C47.2 °C30.5 °C
22.9 °C23.1 °C21.8 °C
Maximum: 48.4 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.3 °C | Room Temperature 19.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.3 °C / 75.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+4.5 °C / 8.1 F).
应力测试表面温度(顶部
应力测试表面温度(顶部
应力测试表面温度(底)。
应力测试表面温度(底)。

发言人

两位发言人中的一位
两位发言人中的一位

底部正面的两个扬声器听起来相当不错,但它们缺乏一些音量和声压。它们对于观看一些视频或播放背景音乐绝对是足够的,但如果要获得良好的游戏音效或电影,最好使用耳机或外部扬声器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.934.42530.232.83125.327.7403029.95024.926.16325.1258022.225.310022.426.912523.335.416021.842.720020.748.525018.650.931516.354.840013.460.650012.458.663013.663.580011.768.9100011.566.4125010.864.7160011.962.8200011.468.7250011.666.3315011.861.6400012.465.2500012.465.563001370.8800013.1701000012.873.11250012.870.21600012.370.7SPL24.879.3N0.645.2median 12.8median 64.7Delta2.38.829.62428.529.524.12328.631.720.626.520.718.618.317.717.821.520.219.422.222.216.832.513.338.118.647.719.550.512.452.19.4549.157.29.658.99.659.39.857.51058.410.557.211.153.211.456.111.652.311.754.712.156.711.859.211.759.911.66023.968.80.623.9median 11.7median 54.73.29.438.33227.426.433.135.832.5372633.920.744.619.453.823.761.318.563.416.765.517.568.317.269.113.169.211.670.810.772.311.171.511.571.710.873.310.781.310.783.11178.61174.811.475.411.869.31274.312.273.712.472.112.369.212.365.611.556.323.888.80.577.6median 11.8median 71.723hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACHDell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--由于OLED显示屏的原因,电池寿命也有所不同

额定功率为120瓦的电源
额定功率为120瓦的电源

对于OLED显示屏,功耗主要取决于内容,较亮的图像会导致较高的功耗。然而,VivoBook 15 Pro在空闲运行期间的测量结果相当好。即使在负载下,也没有什么意外。虽然压力测试期间的最大消耗是107瓦,但它很快就平息在一个稳定的76瓦。这意味着附带的120瓦电源是完全足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.22 / 0.78 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.7 / 9.4 / 10 Watt
Load midlight 74.3 / 106.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N, AMOLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-45%
-154%
7%
-17%
-20%
-31%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
4.7
5
-6%
23
-389%
4.9
-4%
5.7
-21%
7.6
-62%
7.16 ?(3 - 13, n=17)
-52%
Idle Average *
9.4
9
4%
25
-166%
7.9
16%
9.3
1%
9.9
-5%
10.6 ?(7.54 - 15.9, n=17)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
10
20
-100%
29
-190%
14.2
-42%
11
-10%
10.8
-8%
Load Average *
74.3
94
-27%
106
-43%
64.3
13%
83.4
-12%
81
-9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
67.7
123
-82%
128
-89%
55.6
18%
94.4
-39%
76.2
-13%
Load Maximum *
106.9
172
-61%
156
-46%
65.4
39%
128.7
-20%
131
-23%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø67.7 (67-69.7)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø76.2 (68.3-82.9)
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø77.5 (74-107)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø83.5 (68.3-132)

电池寿命

我们在WLAN测试中使用了许多明亮的网站,这实际上代表了OLED显示屏的最坏情况,但使用63瓦时电池的电池寿命仍然是可以的。在150cd/m²的调整亮度下,它仍然可以持续近8.5小时,而在全亮度下则少3小时。另一方面,在150cd/m²的视频测试中,运行时间超过了12小时。移动游戏也是可以的,但那时只能持续一个多小时。

笔记本电脑完全充电需要略多于2小时,但你在勉强26分钟后已经有50%的可用电量,52分钟后有80%的可用电量(在笔记本电脑打开时)。

Battery Runtime
Witcher 3 ultra 150cd
1h 14min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 95)
8h 18min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 95)
5h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 15min
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 56 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 49 Wh
HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 41 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 75 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-3%
-41%
-11%
24%
4%
14%
H.264
725
529
-27%
623
-14%
624
-14%
WiFi v1.3
498
478
-4%
235
-53%
396
-20%
754
51%
420
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra
74
Load
75
91
21%
54
-28%
74
-1%
101
35%
106
41%
Reader / Idle
807
387
901

Pros

+ CPU和GPU的良好性能发展
+ 系统性能高
+ 明亮多彩的OLED面板
+ P3色彩空间覆盖
+ 实用的性能模式

Cons

- 过时的连接标准(USB 2.0,HDMI 1.4b)。
- 60赫兹的PWM
- 反射率很高的显示表面
- 坏的网络摄像头
- 工作存储器被焊接在一起

结论 - VivoBook 15 Pro主要以其性能和显示屏给人留下深刻印象

测试华硕VivoBook 15 Pro OLED。测试装置由campuspoint提供
测试华硕VivoBook 15 Pro OLED。测试装置由campuspoint提供

经过我们的测试,我们能够证明新的VivoBook 15 Pro主要有一个高性能的发展和良好的显示质量。使用可用的性能模式,用户可以影响笔记本电脑的性能和噪音特性。当前Ryzen处理器和RTX 3050的组合为1080p面板提供了一个体面的游戏性能。

OLED显示屏也以出色的色彩和极高的对比度给人留下深刻印象,但也有一些缺点,如高反射表面或PWM闪烁,可能会给一些用户带来问题。

华硕显然在连接设备方面做了一些削减,尤其是旧的连接标准在这里显得很消极。在2021年年底,两个旧的USB 2.0连接和一个HDMI 1.4端口确实不再是最新的了。此外,我们更希望在一台15英寸的多媒体笔记本电脑中采用可更换的内存模块。

新的VivoBook 15 Pro特别提供了大量的性能和出色的OLED面板,但在连接设备方面有一些妥协。

VivoBook实际上与价格明显更高的 戴尔XPS 15.虽然OLED面板几乎不相上下(除了外形因素),戴尔使用了非常高质量的外壳和现代连接(但只有USB-C),但XPS 15主要表现为性能发展薄弱。尽管其组件明显较弱,但VivoBook 15 Pro在实践中并没有真正明显的慢,无论是在CPU还是游戏性能方面。

那些需要更高的性能的人应该看一下 申克XMG Focus 15但你在那里也会遇到更多嘈杂的风扇。戴尔 戴尔G15也提供了更高的游戏性能,但明显更笨重,而 IdeaPad 5 Pro 16联想的IdeaPad 5 Pro 16则得益于更快的Ryzen 7处理器。

价格和可用性

虽然华硕VivoBook Pro 15 OLED被列在 亚马逊但在本次测试时,它是不可用的。也在其美国网站上做了广告。

Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 - 08/30/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
70 / 98 → 72%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
48 / 80 → 60%
Weight
67 / 20-72 → 90%
Battery
85 / 95 → 89%
Display
89%
Games Performance
87 / 90 → 97%
Application Performance
94 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
89 / 95 → 93%
Audio
77%
Camera
30 / 85 → 35%
Average
77%
86%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕VivoBook 15 Pro OLED回顾。负担得起的多媒体笔记本电脑,性能高
Andreas Osthoff, 2021-11- 2 (Update: 2021-11- 2)