据说硅谷的发源地是帕洛阿尔托的一个小车库。1939 年，威廉-休利特（William Hewlett）和大卫-帕卡德（David Packard）就是在那里制造出了他们的第一批产品。如今，惠普与那个小车库已没有多少共同之处。这家制造商生产的电子设备，从笔记本电脑、计算机到打印机，畅销全球。
就连惠普 Envy 系列本身也已经积累了一定的历史。自 2009 年以来，它就一直存在--我们甚至发表过一篇关于惠普 Envy 15 的评论。 惠普 Envy 15的评测。无论过去还是现在，Envy 笔记本电脑都是作为高端设备销售的（毕竟名字就代表了一切），今天的测试机也不例外。至少，从光滑的铝合金和玻璃机身上看，这就是你所期望的。惠普正在向创意人士和自由职业者推销这款设备。但是，在我们的评测中你会发现，惠普 Envy 17-da0076ng 并非一切都是优质的。
尽管如此，这款采用 Nvidia 显卡的笔记本电脑仍不失为一款极具吸引力的替代产品。 LG Gram Pro和 三星Galaxy Book4或 联想 Yoga Pro 9的市场价格往往要便宜得多，这取决于其功能。
HP Envy 17-da0076ng (Envy 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155U 12 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 50 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM
Memory
32 GB
, 2x Samsung M425R2GA3PB0-CWMOL
Display
17.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 130 PPI, 10-point multitouch, BOE0C70, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, 2048 GB
, 1750 GB free
Weight
2.51 kg, Power Supply: 406 g
Price
1699 Euro
Amazon
Sold in
DACH
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 % | v8 | 09 / 2024 | HP Envy 17-da0076ng Ultra 7 155U, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 20.5 mm | 17.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.2 % | v8 | 07 / 2024 | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Ultra 7 155H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 14.4 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 91.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06 / 2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
| 90.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 82 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 i7-1355U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng i7-1255U, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 19.6 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 |
请注意：我们最近更新了评级系统。第 8 版的结果与第 7 版没有可比性。请点击 这里.
案例
惠普 Envy 17 的外壳采用了大量的铝和玻璃材料，使其显得高贵典雅，质量上乘。但这些材料也影响了笔记本电脑的重量，这也解释了为什么制造商决定使用更轻质的塑料作为底座的外壳。不过，惠普 Envy 17 的重量还是超过了 2 千克。幸运的是，做工、触感和稳定性都非常出色。几乎没有任何东西可以扭曲、弯曲或按压。触摸屏的铰链运行平稳，仍能保持屏幕的位置。
在我们的数据库中，配备 17 英寸显示屏的多媒体笔记本电脑并不多见。但你仍然可以看到，Envy 17 比竞争对手要重很多。LG Gram 显然是羽量级的，但 Envy 2.5 公斤的重量更像是游戏笔记本电脑。
连接性
除读卡器外，Envy 17 还具备现代笔记本电脑的所有功能。USB-C 与 Thunderbolt、USB 3.1 和 USB-C 充电，这也意味着右侧的两个端口通常会被占用一个。
交流
Envy 17 配备了英特尔 AX211NGW 模块，支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙。与 6 GHz 网络的 Wi-Fi 连接速度非常快，我们没有遇到任何问题。Wi-Fi 模块可以很容易地更换为 Wi-Fi 7 模块（其他一些配置已经配备了）。
HP Envy 17-da0076ng; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1659 (1590-1701)
HP Envy 17-da0076ng; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1773 (1455-1844)
HP Envy 17-da0076ng; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (870-991)
HP Envy 17-da0076ng; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø964 (491-1033)
网络摄像头
Envy 的网络摄像头像素为 2,816 x 1,584，色彩鲜艳，图像清晰。不使用时，可通过隐私快门将其关闭。
5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
维护
HP Envy 17 具有良好的维护功能。底座的盖子只用几颗螺丝和夹子固定，使用适当的工具和螺丝刀就能轻松取下。进入机箱后，您可以看到一个 M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘、Wi-Fi 模块和一个插槽式内存模块。它由 SO-DIMM 模块组成。HP PartSurfer允许我们识别测试装置中的许多部件，不过在欧洲订购替换部件可能会很麻烦，因为唯一授权的惠普部件经销商在美国和加拿大。
可持续性
根据惠普数据表，惠普 Envy 17-da 的碳足迹为 370 千克二氧化碳当量。.其中 81% 的碳足迹来自生产过程。我们无法找到任何关于笔记本电脑使用回收材料的信息。
至少包装基本上不使用塑料。只有电源装置用保护膜包裹。根据回收标签，即使是我们测试设备所使用的黑色包装袋也是由纤维素制成的，可以与废纸一起处理。
保修
根据数据表、标签和外壳上的印记，我们的测试设备保修两年（不含）。这与地区无关。
输入设备
键盘
惠普 Envy 17 的键盘非常出色，在触感和行程（大于 1.4 毫米）方面都无可挑剔。只是惠普笔记本电脑键盘的布局需要适应一下。制造商使用 ANSI 键盘布局，这意味着，至少在德文版中，你需要使用与 Fn 键的组合键来输入| 、> 或 <。这对日常用户来说听起来并不重要，但对编码人员或家庭办公用户来说可能会造成问题。
键盘具有多级背光和大字体，在黑暗中也清晰可读。细心的用户会注意到 Windows Co-Pilot 键，它现在取代了右侧的 Ctrl 键。在我们的测试中，该功能仍未始终可用。
触摸板
与周围的铝金属相比，触摸板总是给人一种舒适凉爽的感觉，而且具有良好的滑动性能。手感完美无瑕，输入设备的精度也很高。
触摸屏
在翻盖式笔记本电脑上安装触摸屏并不总是很实用。不过，面板上的触摸感应表面仍然运行良好，能快速识别和响应输入。疏油涂层可确保每次触摸都不会自动变成难看的涂抹。
显示屏
屏幕是 Envy 17 用户可能会羡慕竞争对手的第一个方面。目前，Envy 17 只配备了一块全高清显示屏，亮度和色彩都不是很高。它覆盖了约 97% 的 sRGB 色彩空间，亮度为 300 尼特，听起来更像是一款中端设备。60Hz 的刷新率也只是一般水平。凭借 4K 分辨率 前代产品在屏幕质量方面要好得多。幸运的是，惠普 Envy 17 在美国也配备了 4K 面板。
黑色值、对比度和亮度分布都很好；背光出血几乎看不见。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE0C70 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 318 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 290 cd/m² Minimum: 68 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 318 cd/m²
Contrast: 781:1 (Black: 0.407 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.155
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng BOE0C70, IPS, 1920x1080, 17", 60 Hz | LG gram Pro 16Z90SP ATNA60CL06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 LP156WFH-SPD5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | HP Envy 17-cr0079ng BOE0A66, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 27% | 22% | 24% | -43% | 23% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.6 | 99.8 45% | 95.6 39% | 98.6 44% | 38.11 -44% | 98.31 43% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.9 | 100 3% | 99.9 3% | 99.9 3% | 57.7 -40% | 100 3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.4 | 94.6 34% | 86.5 23% | 88.5 26% | 39.41 -44% | 87.03 24% |
| Response Times | 55% | 57% | 98% | -18% | 81% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 6 ? 80% | 12.4 ? 59% | 0.54 ? 98% | 33.6 ? -12% | 1 97% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 14 ? 30% | 8.9 ? 55% | 0.69 ? 97% | 24.8 ? -24% | 7 ? 65% |
| PWM Frequency | 481 | 240 ? | ||||
| Screen | 995% | 25% | 40% | -77% | 26% | |
| Brightness middle | 318 | 420 32% | 404.9 27% | 390 23% | 257.4 -19% | 390 23% |
| Brightness | 290 | 421 45% | 390 34% | 393 36% | 248 -14% | 385 33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 99 16% | 91 7% | 98 15% | 88 4% | 86 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.407 | 0.006 99% | 0.4 2% | 0.3209 21% | 0.395 3% | |
| Contrast | 781 | 70000 8863% | 1012 30% | 802 3% | 987 26% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 1.66 45% | 2.42 19% | 1.4 53% | 6.26 -109% | 1.66 45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 4.92 18% | 4.65 22% | 2.7 55% | 18.28 -205% | 2.9 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 3.39 -239% | 0.93 7% | 4.99 -399% | 1.16 -16% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 1.3 73% | 1.1 78% | 2.1 57% | 3.7 24% | 1.83 63% |
| Gamma | 2.155 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.186 101% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6569 99% | 6609 98% | 6468 100% | 6431 101% | 6606 98% | 6727 97% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 359% /
653% | 35% /
29% | 54% /
46% | -46% /
-61% | 43% /
33% |
* ... smaller is better
惠普 Envy 17-da 的面板甚至没有覆盖整个 sRGB 色彩空间。不出所料，它只能管理更大的 AdobeRGB 和 DisplayP3 色彩空间的约 70%。
惠普 Envy 未达到 ΔΕ2000 3 ex works 的目标值，但幸运的是，使用我们的色彩配置文件（可在上面下载）校准面板非常容易。平均色彩偏差为 ΔΕ2000 1.58，适合专业用途。我们很惊讶地注意到，在工作时会出现明显的绿松石偏色。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
约 300 cd/m² 的亮度对于带有反光表面的屏幕来说并不高。即使在摄影棚的灯光下，我们也能看到反光会严重影响可读性。在室外使用时，即使是在傍晚的阳光下，我们也会发现玻璃表面和低亮度的结合并不一定有益。
惠普 Envy 17 尤其让我们印象深刻的是，从更宽的视角观看屏幕时亮度降低了。这并不一定是件坏事，因为它可以减少在公共场合不必要的偷窥。我们没有发现任何色彩偏差。
性能
惠普 Envy 17 有多种配置可供选择。我们的测试机配备了 英特尔酷睿 7 155U32 GB DDR-5 内存、2 TB NVMe-SSD 和 4 GB 英伟达GeForce RTX 3050.U 系列英特尔处理器现在配备了四核心的英特尔 iGPU。但是，由于 Nvidia 图形处理器可以完成繁重的工作，因此体积更小、能效更高的 iGPU 才是正确的选择。其他配置也有不带专用 GPU 的机型，如 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 155H或 英特尔酷睿至尊 5 125H.在这种情况下，Arc iGPU 也能承担要求更高的图形任务。根据处理器的不同，Envy 可配备 16 或 32 GB 内存以及 512 GB 至 2 TB 的存储空间。
测试条件
通过 myHP 应用程序，您可以访问性能管理设置。每次启动后，程序都会查找其他惠普设备，这通常会耗费大量时间。性能管理有五种模式可供选择，其中 "节能 "模式仅在使用电池时可用。
在我们的测试中，"智能感知"、"平衡 "和 "性能 "都能提供非常接近的性能水平，而且似乎对噪音影响很小。性能模式可将 GPU 性能提升至约 40 瓦，而智能感知和平衡模式的目标是 35 瓦。在所有三种情况下，CPU 的提升性能都在 50 瓦左右。持续性能在 20 到 15 瓦之间波动，具体取决于设备的温度。我们没有注意到 GPU 和 CPU 之间的功率变化。
在测试过程中，我们注意到一件事：只要 Nvidia GPU 开始工作，笔记本电脑就会启动冷却系统。这也提高了处理器的性能。如果 dGPU 处于激活状态，处理器的功耗往往会增加 10 瓦。
笔记本电脑的标准配置为智能感应模式，因此我们使用该模式进行测试。
处理器
不要指望与前代产品相比会有什么重大变化，因为英特尔成熟的 CPU 架构近年来变化不大。从 Intel Core i7-1255U 到 Core Ultra 7 155U，P 内核和 E 内核的数量保持不变。只有 UE 内核是新的。它们的处理能力不强，但非常节能。我们很高兴测试设备的性能在很长一段时间内保持不变，但也注意到处理器的电力供应非常少，这意味着性能最终会降低。工作内存的速度也相对较慢，而惠普 Envy 17 的大多数竞争对手在这些基准测试中的速度都更快。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
HP Envy 17-da0076ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155U: Ø1067 (1029.97-1377.79)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Max Cooling: Ø1797 (1605.27-2243.28)
LG gram Pro 16Z90SP Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1568 (1267.75-1932.27)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2824 (2750.84-2985.74)
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2195 (2134.59-2575.83)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø976 (889.82-1623.77)
HP Envy 17-cr0079ng Intel Core i7-1255U: Ø1368 (1336.72-1422.22)
LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1375 (1298.66-2049.39)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 -2! | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng -2! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7884 - 10780, n=4) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1265 - 1782, n=4) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3075 - 4167, n=4) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (485 - 682, n=4) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1378 - 1740, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (230 - 256, n=4) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (309 - 410, n=4) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (33897 - 41498, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3666 - 4920, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7592 - 9829, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1534 - 2382, n=4) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (6989 - 8805, n=4) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (891 - 1717, n=4) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (8.41 - 12.4, n=4) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (44.3 - 146.7, n=4) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (0.4853 - 0.947, n=4) | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (7048 - 9320, n=4) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (34928 - 48070, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (1827 - 2564, n=4) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (44936 - 46759, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (4251 - 5883, n=4) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (17116 - 23999, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (38152 - 48762, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (546 - 755, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (3521 - 4932, n=4) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (25065 - 44831, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
系统性能
我们的 HP Envy 17 在测试过程中始终运行平稳。同样，内存速度慢和酷睿Ultra 7的瓦数限制也对系统性能基准造成了很大影响。总的来说，尽管我们的测试机配备了最新的硬件，但其性能还是跟不上时代的步伐。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 4542 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (36706 - 77717, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (37978 - 64033, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (38436 - 62982, n=4) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (123.2 - 253, n=4) | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在测试过程中，我们没有注意到任何重大的延迟问题，但 LatencyMon 的结果仍显示出一些问题，可能会给音频处理等现场应用带来麻烦。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G | |
| HP Envy 17-cr0079ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| LG gram Pro 16Z90SP | |
| HP Envy 17-da0076ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
事实再次证明，SK Hynix 是 Envy 17 上一款出色的固态硬盘。在大多数情况下，它都能提供较高的读写速率，并具有必要的耐力。
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
Sequential Read:
5107MB/s
Sequential Write:
3170MB/s
4K Read:
50.9MB/s
4K Write:
150.5MB/s
4K-64 Read:
693MB/s
4K-64 Write:
2204MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.027ms
Access Time Write:
0.023ms
Score Read:
1254Points
Score Write:
2671Points
Score Total:
4481Points