Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12650H

Intel i7-12650H

英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H是一款基于 Alder Lake 架构的笔记本电脑高端移动 CPU。它于 2022 年初发布，提供 6 个高性能内核（P-cores，Golden Cove 架构）和 8 个高效内核（E-cores，Gracemont 架构）中的 4 个。P 核心支持超线程技术，与 E 核心结合可支持 16 个线程。高性能集群的时钟频率为 2.3 至 4.7 GHz，高效集群的时钟频率为 1.7 至 3.5 GHz。E 核心的性能应与旧的 Skylake 核心类似（与酷睿 i7-6700HQ 相比 酷睿 i7-6700HQ).所有内核均可使用多达 24 MB 三级缓存。与 12700H12650H 只提供 4 个而不是 8 个 E 核心，iGPU 速度较慢，而且没有 vPro 功能（用于远程管理）。

性能

得益于 10 个内核，多线程性能应明显快于时钟速度相近的旧版Tiger Lake-H CPU（如 酷睿 i7-11800H).由于架构上的改进，单核性能也优于时钟速度类似或更高的Tiger Lake CPU。

功能特点

集成内存控制器支持各种内存类型，最高可达 DDR5-4800、DDR4-3200、LPDDR5-5200 和 LPDDR4x-4267。线程指令（硬件）可支持操作系统决定在性能核心或高效核心上使用哪个线程，以获得最佳性能。对于人工智能任务，CPU 还集成了 GNA 3.0 和 DL Boost（通过 AVX2）。第 8 版的 Quick Sync 与 Rocket Lake CPU 相同，支持 MPEG-2、AVC、VC-1 解码、JPEG、VP8 解码、VP9、HEVC 和 AV1 硬件解码。CPU 仅支持 PCIe 4.0（一个 GPU x8，两个 SSD x4）。

集成显卡基于 Xe 架构，提供 96 个 EU（执行单元）中的 64 个，工作频率高达 1.4 GHz。

功耗

这款酷睿 i7 处理器的 "最低保证 "功耗为 35 W，基本功耗为 45 W。该处理器的英特尔建议最大 Turbo 功耗为 115 W。

最后但并非最不重要的一点是，英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H 采用英特尔第四代 10 纳米制程工艺，即英特尔 7 处理器，其能效可在 2023 年初达到 OK。

SeriesIntel Alder Lake-P
CodenameAlder Lake-H

Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H

Intel Core i9-12900HK1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H « 1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1700 - 4700 MHz
Level 1 Cache864 KB
Level 2 Cache9.5 MB
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads10 / 16
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
GPUIntel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1400 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/04/2022
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
40.9 pt (57%)
AMD E1-2100
2.47 -94%
...
Intel Core i7-1280P
39.9 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
39.9 -2%
Intel Core i9-11950H
40.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
40.3 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
40.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
40.4 -1%
Intel Core i5-12500H
40.5 -1%
Intel Core i9-11900H
40.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
40.8 0%
Intel Core i7-12650H
40.9
Intel Core i7-1365U
41 0%
Intel Core i7-1360P
41.1 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
41.1 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
41.3 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
41.5 1%
Intel Core i5-13500H
41.6 2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
42.1 3%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
42.1 3%
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
42.3 3%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
57 39%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
72.1 76%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 85     avg: 98     median: 99 (69%)     max: 107 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 294     avg: 515     median: 530 (10%)     max: 673 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 5362     avg: 11525     median: 12074 (11%)     max: 15537 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1428     avg: 1722     median: 1763 (75%)     max: 1808 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 552     avg: 664     median: 679 (75%)     max: 696 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2106     avg: 4459     median: 4691 (11%)     max: 6009 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 753     avg: 1770     median: 1851.5 (12%)     max: 2253 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
011523034546057569080592010351150126513801495161017251840195520702185Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 206     avg: 245.1     median: 250 (75%)     max: 261 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -92%
...
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
241 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
241 -2%
Intel Core i5-13420H
242 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
242 -1%
Intel Core i5-1245U
242 -1%
Intel Core i9-11950H
242.5 -1%
Intel Core i5-12500H
242.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
243 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
245 0%
Intel Core i7-12650H
245.1
AMD Ryzen 7 7736U
246 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
246 0%
Intel Core i7-1360P
247.8 1%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
249 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
250.1 2%
Intel Core i5-13450HX
251 2%
Intel Core i5-13500H
251.2 2%
Intel Core i7-1355U
251.6 3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
252 3%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 27%
max:
Intel Core i9-14900K
332 35%
0%
100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.35     avg: 17.9     median: 18.2 (24%)     max: 25.04 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.52     avg: 2.9     median: 3 (74%)     max: 3.15 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7466     avg: 8300     median: 8301 (50%)     max: 8903 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 20693     avg: 35422     median: 34901.5 (25%)     max: 49328 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 29444     avg: 52500     median: 52008 (36%)     max: 68516 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 11960     avg: 13177     median: 13397 (16%)     max: 14533 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 266.983     avg: 410.5     median: 426 (5%)     max: 483.853 s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.705     avg: 6.5     median: 6.9 (1%)     max: 8.743 s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6896     avg: 7773     median: 7731.5 (12%)     max: 9090 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 27053     avg: 46612     median: 47972 (28%)     max: 59034 MIPS
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5265     avg: 5635     median: 5702.5 (68%)     max: 6116 MIPS
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 53.8     avg: 91.5     median: 88.9 (31%)     max: 127.5 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 197.2     avg: 255.4     median: 262.5 (61%)     max: 311.5 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.62     avg: 13.8     median: 14.3 (25%)     max: 17.4 fps
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.674     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.1     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (26%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 6.7     avg: 9     median: 8.9 (23%)     max: 11.8 GB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 396     avg: 538     median: 479 (6%)     max: 1029 Seconds
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 222     avg: 299.8     median: 277 (2%)     max: 553 Seconds
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4584     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.515 sec
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8344     avg: 12678     median: 12716 (27%)     max: 18599 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.703     avg: 8     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.891 s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.392     avg: 18     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 19.733 s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 413.002     avg: 436.2     median: 433.5 (2%)     max: 463.857 s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 30717     avg: 53165     median: 53162 (47%)     max: 75129 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9219     avg: 18466     median: 18363 (50%)     max: 22811 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 57680     avg: 80244     median: 83501.5 (68%)     max: 88686 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 57559     avg: 81506     median: 85075.5 (69%)     max: 89577 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 80654     avg: 88077     median: 87546.5 (74%)     max: 96373 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8608     avg: 15722     median: 16486.5 (42%)     max: 19297 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12668     avg: 22820     median: 22920 (41%)     max: 27558 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4231     avg: 9365     median: 9953 (42%)     max: 11800 Points
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2131     avg: 2357     median: 2384 (72%)     max: 2481 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 7608     avg: 9408     median: 9656 (38%)     max: 11014 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1590     avg: 1743     median: 1758 (74%)     max: 1797 points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6478     avg: 9797     median: 9784 (18%)     max: 11284 points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1486     avg: 1677     median: 1705 (7%)     max: 1766 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6287     avg: 9019     median: 9099 (29%)     max: 11153 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6711     avg: 7411     median: 7483 (75%)     max: 7705 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24621     avg: 34058     median: 34216 (38%)     max: 41477 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 519     avg: 552     median: 542 (1%)     max: 652 ms
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
86 ms (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85840     avg: 87864     median: 87864 (79%)     max: 89888 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 234     avg: 249.5     median: 250.5 (72%)     max: 268 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 265     avg: 291.3     median: 295.5 (62%)     max: 309 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1532     avg: 1694     median: 1715 (66%)     max: 1875 Points
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.2     avg: 81.3     median: 78.3 (14%)     max: 112.7 Watt
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52.8     avg: 95.3     median: 91.4 (17%)     max: 147 Watt
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.22     avg: 20.2     median: 20.1 (13%)     max: 47.5 Watt
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.04     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (9%)     max: 9.8 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789101112Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.3     avg: 18.9     median: 16.7 (12%)     max: 24.2 Points per Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.26
log 25. 21:16:40

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.015s ... 0.016s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.018s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14051 +0.02s ... 0.037s

#12 got single benchmarks 14051 +0.077s ... 0.114s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +1.055s ... 1.169s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.169s

#16 return log +0s ... 1.169s

Reviews for the Intel Core i7-12650H processor

Nipogi AD08 微型电脑评测：搭载英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H 处理器的时尚电脑，采用迷你塔式设计和三种电源模式

Nipogi AD08 微型电脑评测：搭载英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H 处理器的时尚电脑，采用迷你塔式设计和三种电源模式

NiPoGi 为 AD08 配备了英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H，其性能足以胜任日常办公任务。作为一款采用塔式设计的紧凑型游戏电脑，该制造商在设计上走了一条略有不同的路线。在本评测中，您可以了解到这一设计带来的优势，以及 NiPoGi AD08 与同类迷你 PC 相比的性能表现。...
Intel Core i7-12650H | Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | | 878 g
Nipogi AD08 微型电脑评测：搭载英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H 处理器的时尚电脑，采用迷你塔式设计和三种电源模式

Nipogi AD08 微型电脑评测：搭载英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H 处理器的时尚电脑，采用迷你塔式设计和三种电源模式

NiPoGi 为 AD08 配备了英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H，其性能足以胜任日常办公任务。作为一款采用塔式设计的紧凑型游戏电脑，该制造商在设计上走了一条略有不同的路线。在本评测中，您可以了解到这一设计带来的优势，以及 NiPoGi AD08 与同类迷你 PC 相比的性能表现。...
Intel Core i7-12650H | Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | | 878 g
Nipogi AD08 微型电脑评测：搭载英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H 处理器的时尚电脑，采用迷你塔式设计和三种电源模式

Nipogi AD08 微型电脑评测：搭载英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H 处理器的时尚电脑，采用迷你塔式设计和三种电源模式

NiPoGi 为 AD08 配备了英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H，其性能足以胜任日常办公任务。作为一款采用塔式设计的紧凑型游戏电脑，该制造商在设计上走了一条略有不同的路线。在本评测中，您可以了解到这一设计带来的优势，以及 NiPoGi AD08 与同类迷你 PC 相比的性能表现。...
Intel Core i7-12650H | Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | | 878 g
GMK NucBox K3 Pro 迷你电脑评测：NucBox K2 更出色

GMK NucBox K3 Pro 迷你电脑评测：NucBox K2 更出色

NucBox K3 Pro 是 NucBox K2 的 AMD 替代产品，机箱设计相同，但内部结构不同。NucBox K3 Pro 的型号名称听起来更新、更快，但在性能方面显然不如 NucBox K2。...
Intel Core i7-12650H | Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) | | 396 g
Minisforum 海王星系列 HN2673 评测：搭载酷睿 i7-12650H 和 Arc A730M 的迷你 PC，外形美观大方

Minisforum 海王星系列 HN2673 评测：搭载酷睿 i7-12650H 和 Arc A730M 的迷你 PC，外形美观大方

Minisforum 是少数几家敢于在迷你 PC 中安装英特尔显卡作为专用显卡的制造商之一。海王星系列 HN2673 配备了英特尔 Arc A730M 和英特尔酷睿 i7-12650H。在这篇评测中，我们总结了最重要的方面，包括一系列基准测试和测量结果。...
Intel Core i7-12650H | Intel Arc A730M | | 1.7 kg

Minisforum Venus Series NAB6: Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), 0.6 kg
  Review » Minisforum Venus系列NAB6回顾：拥有快速的英特尔酷睿i7-12650H和主动式固态硬盘冷却的时尚迷你PC!

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » 微星Cyborg 15 A12VF回顾：带有低功耗RTX4060的游戏笔记本

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » 微星Katana 15笔记本电脑回顾：拥有RTX 4050和Alder Lake CPU的预算游戏机

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  Review » 华硕TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC笔记本评测。1440p、165赫兹和全P3颜色，价格低于1000美元

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » 华硕TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR回顾。拥有移动RTX 3070和可接受的电池寿命的笔记本电脑

MSI Thin 15 B12UC: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Thin 15 B12UC

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58, i7-12650H RTX 4050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58, i7-12650H RTX 4050

MSI GF63 Thin 12UCX: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 12UCX

Asus VivoBook 16X K3605ZF: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 16X K3605ZF

MSI Katana GF66 12UCK: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 12UCK

Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K6501ZM: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 15 K6501ZM

Asus Vivobook 16X K3605ZC: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16X K3605ZC

Asus Vivobook 16X K3605ZU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 16X K3605ZU

MSI Crosshair 15 C12VF: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 15 C12VF

MSI Katana 15 B12VGK: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 15 B12VGK

MSI Crosshair 15 C12VG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 15 C12VG

MSI Katana GF66 12UE: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 12UE

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602ZC, i7-12650H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602ZC, i7-12650H

MSI Katana 17 B12VFK: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 17 B12VFK

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VE, i7-12650H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Cyborg 15 A12VE, i7-12650H

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VE: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Cyborg 15 A12VE

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 16IAH7: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 16IAH7

MSI GF63 Thin 12VE-066US: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 12VE-066US

MSI Sword 15 A12UE: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Sword 15 A12UE

MSI Katana GF66 12UD-436: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana GF66 12UD-436

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 15 B12VEK

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X N7601ZM-MQ712WS: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 16X N7601ZM-MQ712WS

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZR, i7-12650H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZR, i7-12650H

MSI Creator M16 A12UEV-468: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Creator M16 A12UEV-468

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR

Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-79ZW: Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-79ZW

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7, i7-12650H RTX 3050 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7, i7-12650H RTX 3050 Ti

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZE: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZE

Asus TUF Dash 15 FX517ZM-AS73: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Dash 15 FX517ZM-AS73

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2022, i7 RTX 2050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2022, i7 RTX 2050

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZM, i7-12650H RTX 3060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 16.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZM, i7-12650H RTX 3060

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2022, i7 RTX 2050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » 小米刷新红米笔记本Pro 15 2022，CPU更强大，价格降低

Please share our article, every link counts!

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Alder Lake-P

» Intel Core i9-12900HK
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i9-12900H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12800H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12650H
   10x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core i5-12600H
   12x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core i5-12500H
   12x 1.8 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-1280P
   14x 1.3 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i7-1270P
   12x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i7-1260P
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core i5-12450H
   8x 1.5 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core i5-1250P
   12x 1.2 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core i5-1240P
   12x 1.2 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core i3-1220P
   10x 1.1 GHz - 4.4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i7-12700H
   14x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-1370P
   14x 1.4 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ Intel Core i5-13450HX
   10x 1.8 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core i7-12650H
   10x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
- Apple M1 Max
   10x 2.06 GHz - 3.22 GHz
- Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
   10x 2.42 GHz - 3.7 GHz
- Apple M1 Pro
   10x 2.06 GHz - 3.22 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Intel Alder Lake-P i7-12650H 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-11-27)