Notebookcheck Logo

戴尔Inspiron 15 Plus笔记本电脑评测。接近于完美的全能型产品

细节上的弱点。 通过Inspiron 15 Plus,戴尔提供了一款时尚而紧凑的多媒体笔记本电脑,适用于各种用途。我们对这款15英寸的笔记本电脑进行了详细了解。
Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake

目前在戴尔的德国网站上有两款Inspiron 15 Plus 7510的变体。第一个是我们的评测版本,其中包括一个酷睿i5-11400H以及一个 GeForce RTX 3050价格略低于850欧元(约合852美元)。此外,还有一个带有GeForce RTX 3050 Ti酷睿i7-11800H的变种,价格约为1000欧元(约合人民币100元)。然而,考虑到其外形尺寸和图形性能,后者相当 "强大"。

两种型号都有一个磨砂宽屏,刷新率为60赫兹,分辨率共同为1,920x1,080像素。一块512GB的NVMe固态硬盘作为存储,在单通道模式下只有微薄的8GB内存(我们将在后面解释其缺点)。在操作系统方面没有惊喜,是Windows 11 Home。

Dell Inspiron 15 Plus (Inspiron 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-11400H 6 x 2.7 - 4.5 GHz, 109 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1500 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 65 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 516.59, Optimus
Memory
8 GB 
, DDR4-3200, single-channel, two slots (one in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Dell INSPIRON LGD06A6, IPS, Full HD, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK, 512 GB 
, M.2 NVMe SSD
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Point PCH - cAVS
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1 combined (headset/mic), Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 356 x 229
Battery
56 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p 30 FPS
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 130-watt power supply, Office 365 (trial), McAfee LiveSafe (trial), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.855 kg, Power Supply: 394 g
Price
849 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Inspiron 15 Plus的竞争对手包括其他配备GeForce RTX 3050 (Ti)的多媒体笔记本电脑,如 华硕VivoBook 15 Pro,以及华硕Zenbook Pro 15,或内部的 戴尔XPS 15 9510但其中一些的价格要贵得多。我们的对比图还包括16英寸的兄弟姐妹机型,即Inspiron 16 Plus。 Inspiron 16 Plus.

与可能的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.5 %
07/2022
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
1.9 kg19 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.7 %
10/2021
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
2 kg18.99 mm16.00"3072x1920
85.9 %
11/2021
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
1.7 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
88.4 %
09/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160
87.7 %
05/2022
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080

案例

Inspiron 15 Plus的占地面积仅为35.6 x 22.9厘米,是比较紧凑的全能型笔记本电脑之一。1.9厘米的建筑高度也相当低,使戴尔的设备具有纤细的外观。谈到重量,情况也类似:1.9公斤对于一个15英寸的设备来说非常适中,而且它(仍然)可以舒适地运输。然而,这个箱子最大的优点是它的时尚设计。部分由金属制成的银色表面(盖子和顶部)看起来既时尚又优雅,在任何情况下或环境中(办公室、大学等)都显得很有特点。

Inspiron 15 Plus在做工方面的表现不尽如人意。不幸的是,在细节方面可以发现一些不一致的地方。例如,我们的评测样品中的触摸板并不完全合适,右下角有点突出。此外,盖子的油漆在开箱时就已经有轻微的损坏。戴尔应该相应地改进其质量控制(根据我们的经验,制造商在这方面经常出现问题)。

戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus
戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus
戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus
戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus
戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus

在坚固性方面没有什么可抱怨的。虽然底座在强大的压力下会在中间区域弯曲,但在正常使用时,"外壳弯曲 "被控制在一定范围内。盖子提供了一个可以容忍的稳定程度。

铰链的工作做得很好。打开盖子,提高了基本单元(更好的空气流动),也可以用一只手来操作。盖子在打开时被牢牢地固定住,而且相对不受表面振动的影响。

尺寸比较

359.8 mm 235.3 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg356 mm 229 mm 19 mm 1.9 kg355.28 mm 247.5 mm 18.99 mm 2 kg354 mm 238 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性

端口

端口配置给人的印象不一。一方面,Inspiron 15 Plus提供了一个现代的Thunderbolt 4端口(支持DisplayPort的USB-C和Power Delivery),但另一方面,这款15英寸的笔记本缺少一个RJ45端口和一个Kensington锁。总共三个USB端口(2个Type-A 3.2 Gen 1)和一个音频插孔也有点有限。至少戴尔的设备配备了一个成熟的--虽然很慢--SD卡读卡器。

接口的分布并不理想。由于设备的设计和铰链,背部不包含任何端口,而两侧的后部区域被通风口占据,所以端口位于相当远的前方,这可能导致在左右两侧使用外部鼠标时的运动限制。

左侧。电源、HDMI 2.0、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1、Thunderbolt 4(包括DisplayPort)。
左侧。电源、HDMI 2.0、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1、Thunderbolt 4(包括DisplayPort)。
右侧。音频、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1、SD读卡器
右侧。音频、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1、SD读卡器

SD卡阅读器

如前所述,戴尔安装了一个极其缓慢的读卡器。传输照片的速度约为21MB/s,甚至不能与USB 2.0相提并论,与它的16英寸兄弟姐妹一起,我们的评测装置在测试领域中排名垫底。相比之下。Zenbook Pro 15达到了坚实的81MB/s,而XPS 15则是一流的224MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
224 MB/s +967%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.6 - 205, n=63, last 2 years)
91.6 MB/s +336%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.6 MB/s +284%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H (AV Pro V60)
36.8 MB/s +75%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
21 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
19.12 MB/s -9%

沟通

在Wi-Fi性能方面,Inspiron 15 Plus的表现非常好。在距离我们的新参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000一米的地方,英特尔Wi-Fi 6模块(AX201)在我们的接收测试中取得了平均1413 Mb/s的良好速率。

Networking - iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (390 - 1734, n=71)
1437 MBit/s +2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (701 - 1789, n=74, last 2 years)
1414 MBit/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1413 (1346min - 1465max) MBit/s
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (1346-1465)

网络摄像头

就质量而言,720p的网络摄像头并没有什么出奇之处。正如通常的情况一样,在色彩准确性以及图像清晰度方面存在问题。然而,隐私快门应该受到赞扬。可以使用滑块方便地遮盖网络摄像头。

ColorChecker
9.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell Inspiron 15 Plus: 8.38 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 15.3 ∆E

安全问题

作为一项安全功能,Inspiron 15 Plus配备了一个指纹传感器,它被方便地集成到电源按钮中。

辅料

除了一些信息手册外,这款笔记本电脑当然还伴随着一个强制性的电源适配器。这款130瓦的机型重量不到400克,其15 x 7.5 x 2.5厘米的尺寸并不过分笨重。

维护

想进入Inspiron 15 Plus内部的用户首先要卸下九颗小十字头螺丝,并将底盖从固定处撬开。引擎盖下的画面是普通的。Wi-Fi模块、内存插槽(2个SO-DIMM DDR4)和大容量存储插槽(1个M.2 2230,1个M.2 2280)与电池和冷却系统一样容易接近(见照片)。

戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus
戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus
戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus
戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus

担保

基本保修期只包括12个月。然而,在配置笔记本电脑时,这一期限可以延长到三年,但需要额外收费,并且可以增加高级或高级强化支持。

输入设备

键盘

Inspiron 15 Plus的输入设备给人留下了良好印象。首先是键盘,它具有典型的笔记本Chiclet设计和深灰色按键。我们认为打字的体验相当清晰,适合日常使用,尽管作者希望打字的力度稍微大一些。此外,当你更用力地按下按键时,键盘并不特别安静。

精心设计的布局是一个优点。除了中间的小方向箭头之外,所有的键都有一个合适的尺寸,而且在大多数情况下,位置也很合理。此外,一些买家会高兴地看到一个完整的数字键盘已经被包括在内。白色的背光可以分两级调节,在黑暗的环境中特别有用。

戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus
戴尔 Inspiron 15 Plus

触摸板

除了上述的做工缺陷外,触摸板几乎没有什么可以批评的地方。11.5 x 8厘米的表面对于一个15英寸的设备来说是相当大的,而且它还允许你在更长的空间内移动光标,而不必重新设置你的手指。戴尔选择的相当光滑的表面也确保了良好的滑行性能。鼠标垫的精确度也令人满意。

戴尔唯一应该改进的是对多点触摸的支持。在测试中,所支持的手势(如缩放)偶尔会有点笨拙和草率。最后,底部的两个点击面以强烈的、但也相当响亮的反馈吸引了人们的注意。

显示

虽然其他几款经济型全能产品在图像质量方面表现出明显的弱点,但Inspiron 15 Plus的显示屏却很不错。

292
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Dell INSPIRON LGD06A6 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 285.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 298 cd/m²
Contrast: 745:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.61
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
66.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.102
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Dell INSPIRON LGD06A6, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
ATNA56YX03-0, AMOLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
13%
36%
37%
20%
Display P3 Coverage
64.1
74.1
16%
99.9
56%
99.9
56%
79.3
24%
sRGB Coverage
92.8
99.4
7%
99.9
8%
100
8%
95.6
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.2
75.8
15%
95.8
45%
98.1
48%
87.3
32%
Response Times
-63%
88%
88%
91%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31.6 ?(14.4, 17.2)
49.2 ?(24.8, 24.4)
-56%
3.2 ?(1.6, 1.6)
90%
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
89%
2.1 ?(1, 1.1)
93%
Response Time Black / White *
21.6 ?(11.1, 10.5)
36.8 ?(20.8, 16)
-70%
3.2 ?(1.6, 1.6)
85%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
87%
2.3 ?(1.1, 1.2)
89%
PWM Frequency
60.2 ?(60)
59.5 ?(99)
60.2
Screen
32%
40%
114%
32%
Brightness middle
298
296.8
0%
396
33%
362
21%
342.9
15%
Brightness
285
292
2%
397
39%
367
29%
346
21%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
99
15%
97
13%
98
14%
Black Level *
0.4
0.21
47%
0.06
85%
Contrast
745
1413
90%
6033
710%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.68
2.56
30%
2
46%
2.1
43%
2.42
34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.39
4.76
36%
4.8
35%
4.1
45%
4.05
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.61
1.86
29%
1.8
31%
2.5
4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.3
2.6
51%
1
81%
1.4
74%
2.1
60%
Gamma
2.102 105%
2.07 106%
2.17 101%
2.18 101%
2.21 100%
CCT
6143 106%
6628 98%
6608 98%
6608 98%
6364 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-6% / 14%
55% / 47%
80% / 94%
48% / 39%

* ... smaller is better

虽然745:1的对比度和286 cd/m²的平均亮度相当差(户外使用需要至少350 cd/m²),但全高清显示屏并没有显示任何其他主要缺点。93%的sRGB覆盖率和22至32毫秒的响应时间对于一台经济型多媒体笔记本电脑来说是可以的。色彩准确性也是如此。如果你排除了微妙的红色色调,这可以通过校准来纠正(我们的ICC文件链接在上面的亮度图旁边),该面板提供了一个坚实的色彩再现。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

可视角度是典型的IPS水平,这意味着即使从斜向位置看,它们仍然相当稳定。

Inspiron 15 Plus vs. sRGB
Inspiron 15 Plus vs. sRGB
Inspiron 15 Plus vs. AdobeRGB
Inspiron 15 Plus vs. AdobeRGB
Inspiron 15 Plus vs. P3
Inspiron 15 Plus vs. P3

VivoBook 15 Pro、Zenbook Pro 15和XPS 15表明,在这方面花更多钱是值得的。它们的OLED显示屏在几乎所有的学科上都取得了更好的成绩--无论是色彩空间、响应时间、色彩再现、亮度、黑度,还是对比度。作为回报,Inspiron不需要PWM/闪烁。

思考
思考
子像素网格
子像素网格
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.1 ms rise
↘ 10.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

业绩

15 Plus是一款真正的中档笔记本电脑。在我们的评测配置中,组件是很平衡的,尽管只提供8GB的内存已经达到了极限,最好能扩展到16GB的双通道内存。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

测试条件

不同的配置文件隐藏在预装的 "我的戴尔 "软件的 "性能"、"设置"、"温度 "下。我们所有的测量都是使用 "优化 "模式进行的,该模式默认是激活的。另外,"冷却"、"安静 "和 "超性能 "模式仍可选择。

处理器

低价版Inspiron 15 Plus配备了一个六核处理器(通过超线程实现12个线程)。酷睿i5-11400H是基于英特尔的Tiger Lake 代,已经不完全是最新的了。它有12MB的L3缓存,最大时钟频率为4.5GHz。

尽管在Cinebench R15循环测试中速度保持相当稳定,但酷睿i5-11400H无法与AMD的六核竞争者,即 Ryzen 5 5600H,在性能方面。正如预期的那样,更昂贵的酷睿i7-11800H八核芯片完全无法达到。同样的情况发生在 Ryzen 9 5900HX.然而,酷睿i5-11400H对于典型的多媒体任务是完全足够的,它提供了一个平衡的性能。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus Intel Core i5-11400H: Ø1125 (1069.8-1220.78)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1599 (1568.75-1643.18)
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H; Performance Mode: Ø1495 (1487.93-1521.72)
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H; Standard: Ø1463 (1457.89-1472.1)
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H; Quiet Mode: Ø1224 (1166.35-1434.93)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2073 (2054.55-2114.16)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
82.8 pt
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
77.3 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
69.3 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
68.3 pt
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
62.2 pt
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
 
57.5 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
53.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (3127 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)
13837 Points +78%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12845 (12414.2min - 12844.5max) Points +65%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
10748 (9924.9min - 10747.5max) Points +38%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
10531 Points +35%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
9166 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (6674 - 9406, n=7)
8150 Points +5%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
7772 Points
Single Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2110, n=97, last 2 years)
1701 Points +17%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
1520 Points +4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1498 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1479 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
1459 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (1349 - 1472, n=6)
1428 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1343 Points -8%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (1192 - 11768, n=96, last 2 years)
5204 Points +77%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4981 Points +70%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
4106 Points +40%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
3848 Points +31%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
3582 Points +22%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (2550 - 3740, n=7)
3142 Points +7%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
2936 Points
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=96, last 2 years)
638 Points +14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
584 Points +4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
577 Points +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
562 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (522 - 569, n=6)
557 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
531 Points -6%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (580 - 4703, n=105, last 2 years)
2270 Points +86%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2114 (2054.55min - 2114.16max) Points +73%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2024 Points +66%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2010 Points +65%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
1643 (1568.75min - 1643.18max) Points +35%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1522 Points +25%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1466 Points +20%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1435 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (1014 - 1532, n=7)
1297 Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
1221 (1069.8min - 1220.78max) Points
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (142.6 - 308, n=98, last 2 years)
248 Points +13%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
236 Points +8%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
223 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
219 Points
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (202 - 219, n=6)
214 Points -2%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
419 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (340 - 483, n=6)
400 Seconds * +5%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
332 Seconds * +21%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
298 Seconds * +29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 956, n=94, last 2 years)
277 Seconds * +34%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
272 Seconds * +35%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
245 Seconds * +42%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58141 MIPS +111%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11813 - 119900, n=89, last 2 years)
56077 MIPS +103%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
46675 MIPS +69%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
43065 MIPS +56%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
42570 MIPS +54%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (27615 - 40268, n=6)
33927 MIPS +23%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
27615 MIPS
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7163, n=89, last 2 years)
5608 MIPS +10%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5595 MIPS +10%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
5515 MIPS +8%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
5439 MIPS +7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
5427 MIPS +7%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (4802 - 5343, n=6)
5104 MIPS 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
5094 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (3307 - 23059, n=99, last 2 years)
11100 Points +137%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8445 Points +80%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
8164 Points +74%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
6364 Points +36%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (4679 - 7018, n=7)
6131 Points +31%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
4679 Points
Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2342, n=99, last 2 years)
1740 Points +25%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1540 Points +10%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1518 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (1396 - 1528, n=7)
1478 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1429 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
1396 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.2 fps +79%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.12 - 30.5, n=87, last 2 years)
15.2 fps +79%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.5 fps +47%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.4 fps +46%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
11.5 fps +36%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (8.19 - 11.3, n=6)
9.64 fps +14%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
8.48 fps
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
53.6 s * -2%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
52.3 s *
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.5 s * +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 84.9, n=91, last 2 years)
48.6 s * +7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * +9%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (41.4 - 53, n=6)
46.7 s * +11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.3 s * +11%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H
0.605 sec *
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (0.581 - 0.644, n=6)
0.598 sec * +1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.567 sec * +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.561 sec * +7%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
0.533 sec * +12%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.508 sec * +16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3826 - 0.763, n=89, last 2 years)
0.4869 sec * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1221 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
143.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
219 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
95.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
80.7 pt
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
68.9 pt
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
 
63.4 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
59.1 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
0 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
0 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
15386 KRay/s +61%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3804 - 27411, n=87, last 2 years)
12513 KRay/s +31%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
10946 KRay/s +14%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (9569 - 10878, n=4)
10407 KRay/s +9%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
9569 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
96153 Points +135%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
68549 Points +67%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16379 - 136048, n=87, last 2 years)
64137 Points +57%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (40926 - 45602, n=4)
43848 Points +7%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
40926 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
3304 MB/s +23%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1099 - 6681, n=87, last 2 years)
2972 MB/s +10%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (2692 - 3103, n=4)
2951 MB/s +10%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
2692 MB/s
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
2350 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
101156 Points +45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 134321, n=87, last 2 years)
91140 Points +31%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
74015 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (69196 - 70253, n=4)
69689 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
69549 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12420 Points +76%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3099 - 15484, n=87, last 2 years)
8949 Points +27%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
8649 Points +23%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (7038 - 7214, n=4)
7163 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
7038 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
51997 Points +116%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
37739 Points +57%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9602 - 68591, n=87, last 2 years)
33010 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (24039 - 27242, n=4)
26142 Points +9%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
24039 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
127691 MB/s +27%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (99449 - 107459, n=4)
102843 MB/s +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
100645 MB/s
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
91509 MB/s -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23702 - 169946, n=87, last 2 years)
75508 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Multimedia
  (228 - 1901, n=87, last 2 years)
843 MB/s +59%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
819 MB/s +54%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
596 MB/s +12%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
531 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (531 - 593, n=5)
457 MB/s -14%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7941 KRay/s +50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1996 - 14590, n=87, last 2 years)
6687 KRay/s +26%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
5764 KRay/s +9%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (5293 - 5884, n=4)
5661 KRay/s +7%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
5293 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 52727, n=87, last 2 years)
35469 MPixel/s +304%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19968 MPixel/s +128%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (8770 - 24104, n=4)
17302 MPixel/s +97%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
16014 MPixel/s +83%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
8770 MPixel/s

系统性能

糟糕的内存配置是导致系统性能只够在测试领域排在最后一位的原因之一。由于有了更快的CPU和16GB而不是8GB的内存,16英寸Inspiron 16 Plus的兄弟姐妹机型在PCMark 10中领先20%以上。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6687 Points +30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4039 - 8670, n=84, last 2 years)
6527 Points +27%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B
6282 Points +22%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6019 Points +17%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
5905 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (5136 - 5895, n=2)
5516 Points +7%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11400H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
5136 Points
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=84, last 2 years)
10421 Points +21%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
10348 Points +20%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
9987 Points +16%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B
9841 Points +14%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9490 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (8610 - 9155, n=2)
8883 Points +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11400H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
8610 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9614 Points +18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5462 - 11186, n=84, last 2 years)
8658 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
8627 Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B
8413 Points +3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8344 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (8149 - 8506, n=2)
8328 Points +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11400H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
8149 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (3861 - 13548, n=84, last 2 years)
8494 Points +62%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8158 Points +56%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B
8125 Points +55%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7475 Points +43%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
6486 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (5242 - 7140, n=2)
6191 Points +18%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11400H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
5242 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Multimedia
  (1009 - 2146, n=89, last 2 years)
1682 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1425 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Multimedia
  (971 - 2064, n=89, last 2 years)
1608 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1446 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Multimedia
  (933 - 2865, n=89, last 2 years)
1866 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1470 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2171, n=89, last 2 years)
1453 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1246 Points
PCMark 10 Score
5136 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia
  (20513 - 92447, n=87, last 2 years)
59041 MB/s +188%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
41194 MB/s +101%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
38540 MB/s +88%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (20513 - 42471, n=4)
31852 MB/s +55%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
20513 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 90142, n=87, last 2 years)
58669 MB/s +153%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
44470 MB/s +92%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
41378 MB/s +79%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (23172 - 48221, n=4)
36073 MB/s +56%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
23172 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 95196, n=87, last 2 years)
62228 MB/s +185%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
43882 MB/s +101%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
36270 MB/s +66%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (21862 - 45893, n=4)
34120 MB/s +56%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
21862 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia
  (75 - 346, n=86, last 2 years)
100.1 ns * -4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
97.1 ns * -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Intel Core i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
95.9 ns *
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
75.2 ns * +22%
Average Intel Core i5-11400H
  (73.3 - 95.9, n=5)
70.9 ns * +26%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在延迟测试中,这台15英寸的机器在其竞争对手之间安然无恙。根据LatencyMon工具,Inspiron 15 Plus不是实时音频和视频编辑的理想选择,除非做出调整。

延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1914 μs * -46%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM3PDP3512B
1700 μs * -30%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11400H, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
1311 μs *
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
447.7 μs * +66%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
194.1 μs * +85%

* ... smaller is better

储存

正如现代笔记本电脑所预期的那样,一个基于M.2的NVMe固态硬盘被用于大容量存储。内置的美光2450的512GB版本在我们的基准测试课程中提供了一个体面的性能。在理想情况下,连续速度分别超过2100MB/s(读取)和1300MB/s(写入)。从长远来看,需要更多存储空间的用户可以为该设备添加第二个M.2驱动器。

Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3225 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3151 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 460.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 541.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2077 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2636 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 64.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 196.4 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
85.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
82.5 pt
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
 
68.7 pt
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
67.2 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
61.6 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
47.9 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
47.1 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Multimedia
  (756 - 4861, n=86, last 2 years)
2808 MB/s +36%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2067 (2061.78min - 2067.37max) MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
2061 (2047.34min - 2061.29max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2052 (1985.36min - 2051.76max) MB/s 0%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1877 (1850.74min - 1877.16max) MB/s -9%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (756 - 2309, n=9)
1867 MB/s -9%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
1465 (1443.52min - 1464.65max) MB/s -29%
seq write
Average of class Multimedia
  (790 - 5709, n=86, last 2 years)
2919 MB/s +14%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2885 (2677.74min - 2884.84max) MB/s +13%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
2553 (2534.55min - 2553.28max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2535 (2514.28min - 2534.65max) MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (830 - 3301, n=9)
2524 MB/s -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2094 (2014.52min - 2093.59max) MB/s -18%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
500 (432.64min - 499.96max) MB/s -80%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia
  (1023 - 7121, n=86, last 2 years)
5090 MB/s +57%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
3601 (1997.96min - 3600.81max) MB/s +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
3247 (2777.05min - 3247.02max) MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
3224 (2977.45min - 3223.74max) MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (1023 - 3634, n=9)
3022 MB/s -7%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2885 (2630.48min - 2884.95max) MB/s -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
2326 (1740.51min - 2326.37max) MB/s -28%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia
  (871 - 6761, n=86, last 2 years)
3844 MB/s +22%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
3143 (3121.03min - 3143.01max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3099 (3088.57min - 3099.38max) MB/s -1%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2980 (2751.88min - 2980.38max) MB/s -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2869 (2808.3min - 2869.32max) MB/s -9%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (934 - 3351, n=9)
2806 MB/s -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
497 (409.78min - 496.82max) MB/s -84%
4k q1 t1 read
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
64.4 (63.08min - 64.38max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 149.1, n=86, last 2 years)
64 MB/s -1%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
58.1 (58.04min - 58.14max) MB/s -10%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (18.6 - 71.5, n=9)
53 MB/s -18%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
45.2 (45.1min - 45.24max) MB/s -30%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
45 (44.59min - 44.97max) MB/s -30%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
29 (20.95min - 28.96max) MB/s -55%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (66.6 - 421, n=9)
229 MB/s +12%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
205 (199.26min - 204.51max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
199 (196.54min - 199.11max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (80.9 - 378, n=86, last 2 years)
179.1 MB/s -13%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
126.2 (125.07min - 126.24max) MB/s -38%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
123 (122.83min - 123.2max) MB/s -40%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
112 (108.82min - 112.38max) MB/s -45%
4k q32 t16 read
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2227 (2222.18min - 2226.53max) MB/s +211%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1454 (1427.16min - 1454.02max) MB/s +103%
Average of class Multimedia
  (315 - 4358, n=86, last 2 years)
1336 MB/s +86%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (416 - 1577, n=9)
1131 MB/s +58%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
720 (687.45min - 719.86max) MB/s 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
717 (710.1min - 717.45max) MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
663 (660.46min - 662.8max) MB/s -8%
4k q32 t16 write
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2331 (2324.12min - 2330.72max) MB/s +368%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (365 - 3249, n=9)
1507 MB/s +203%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=86, last 2 years)
1085 MB/s +118%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
561 (551.12min - 560.8max) MB/s +13%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
498 (475.55min - 497.83max) MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
422 (416.05min - 421.67max) MB/s -15%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
362 (349.17min - 361.87max) MB/s -27%
AS SSD
Score Total
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
5913 Points +46%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5037 Points +24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2010 - 9972, n=83, last 2 years)
5024 Points +24%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (3300 - 5170, n=9)
4194 Points +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
4061 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
2804 Points -31%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
2160 Points -47%
Score Read
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2252 Points +85%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1711 Points +40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=83, last 2 years)
1682 Points +38%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (1008 - 1878, n=9)
1507 Points +24%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
1218 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
1059 Points -13%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
545 Points -55%
Score Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (545 - 4813, n=83, last 2 years)
2541 Points +13%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2524 Points +12%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2477 Points +10%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
2245 Points
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (966 - 2563, n=9)
1922 Points -14%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1319 Points -41%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
1256 Points -44%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia
  (1192 - 5639, n=83, last 2 years)
3903 MB/s +82%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
3142 MB/s +47%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (1510 - 3127, n=9)
2743 MB/s +28%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2477.93 MB/s +16%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
2138.92 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
2077 MB/s -3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1362 MB/s -36%
Seq Write
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2806 MB/s +106%
Average of class Multimedia
  (388 - 5101, n=83, last 2 years)
2486 MB/s +83%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (1359 - 3008, n=9)
2269 MB/s +67%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1905.48 MB/s +40%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1440 MB/s +6%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
1359.49 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
778 MB/s -43%
4K Read
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (35.2 - 95.9, n=9)
69.2 MB/s +22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30 - 98.5, n=83, last 2 years)
62.6 MB/s +10%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
56.83 MB/s
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
54.4 MB/s -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
49.6 MB/s -13%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
43.88 MB/s -23%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
38.43 MB/s -32%
4K Write
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
236.1 MB/s +79%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (132.2 - 364, n=9)
222 MB/s +68%
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=83, last 2 years)
187.3 MB/s +42%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
144.82 MB/s +10%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
132.18 MB/s
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
125 MB/s -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
121.4 MB/s -8%
4K-64 Read
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1884 MB/s +99%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1419.27 MB/s +50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (413 - 2989, n=83, last 2 years)
1229 MB/s +30%
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (686 - 1469, n=9)
1164 MB/s +23%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
946.92 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
801 MB/s -15%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
370.5 MB/s -61%
4K-64 Write
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2141.76 MB/s +8%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2118 MB/s +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (281 - 4265, n=83, last 2 years)
2105 MB/s +6%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
1977.1 MB/s
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (433 - 2101, n=9)
1473 MB/s -25%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1054 MB/s -47%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
942 MB/s -52%
Access Time Read
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (0.024 - 0.116, n=9)
0.07622 ms * -34%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.076 ms * -33%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
0.06 ms * -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.168, n=83, last 2 years)
0.05914 ms * -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
0.057 ms *
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.042 ms * +26%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
0.032 ms * +44%
Access Time Write
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
0.301 ms *
Average Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
  (0.132 - 0.4, n=9)
0.2039 ms * +32%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
0.135 ms * +55%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.077 ms * +74%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Kingston OM3PDP3512B
0.073 ms * +76%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=83, last 2 years)
0.05965 ms * +80%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
0.031 ms * +90%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01653304956608259901155132014851650181519802145231024752640280529703135Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus: Ø3172 (2896.59-3242.41)

图形卡

NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050是一款适用于多媒体笔记本电脑的好显卡。基于安培一代的DirectX 12模型有2,048个着色器和4GB GDDR6显存。就像你对当前Nvidia芯片的期望一样,性能极其依赖于TGP设置。在65瓦(包括动态提升),戴尔选择了一个既不高也不低的数值;相反,它的目标是中端,这与整体概念是一致的。

在图形基准测试中没有任何不正常或令人惊讶的情况。3DMark基准测试的GPU得分证明,Inspiron 15 Plus提供了一个稳定的性能,与竞争对手基本持平。

注:我们随后在笔记本上添加了第二个8GB模块,以便为测试目的实现16GB双通道配置。在3DMark 11中,物理和综合得分因此而大量增加,总体得分提高了10%以上(GPU得分几乎没有变化)。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
97.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
92.5 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
86.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
 
86.3 pt
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
85.9 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
81.3 pt
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
78.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3408 - 60250, n=88, last 2 years)
18158 Points +16%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
17248 Points +10%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
16944 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (11980 - 18557, n=22)
15711 Points 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
15709 Points
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
13643 Points -13%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
81826 Points +33%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
66589 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (33426 - 87403, n=17)
65657 Points +7%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
61608 Points
Average of class Multimedia
  (14679 - 150699, n=62, last 2 years)
57252 Points -7%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
52180 Points -15%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
48479 Points -21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=89, last 2 years)
13382 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
13002 Points +4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
12611 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
12445 Points
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12119 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (9138 - 14157, n=20)
11915 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
10497 Points -16%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=89, last 2 years)
5057 Points +13%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4958 Points +10%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
4783 Points +7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4591 Points +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (3281 - 5295, n=21)
4517 Points +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
4490 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
3931 Points -12%
3DMark 11 Performance
12990 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
28274 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10953 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4508 points
Help

游戏性能

GeForce RTX 3050的游戏性能因标题、分辨率和质量水平的不同而有很大差异。虽然老的或要求不高的游戏,如《奇异旅团》吸血鬼血猎在原生全高清分辨率下运行流畅,即使是最大的细节,但在CPU密集型或VRAM重的游戏中,Inspiron 15 Plus很快就达到了极限,例如 战争之神Cyberpunk 2077因此,必须将细节降低到中等水平。

一般来说,你不应该期待RTX 3050的光线追踪。 F1 22例如,在全RT状态下会出现严重的停滞。可怜的单通道内存在中等设置和分辨率下再次变得明显。在某些情况下,具有可比性的TGP的其他RTX 3050笔记本电脑明显领先。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
92.1 (85min) fps +26%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
92.1 (87min) fps +26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 290, n=91, last 2 years)
89 fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (53.5 - 105.1, n=17)
79.2 fps +8%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11400H
73.3 (59min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
51.6 (47min) fps +18%
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
49.9 (47min) fps +14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=97, last 2 years)
49.1 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
  (31.5 - 55.8, n=21)
45.2 fps +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11400H
43.9 (36min) fps

为了评估3D性能在较长一段时间内的表现,我们运行了角色扮演游戏游戏 Witcher 3在最大设置下运行了60分钟。你可以从图中看到,不时有短暂的性能下降或停顿。一个奇怪的事实是:一个小时后,当FPS测量已经结束时,CPU也开始节流(与压力测试部分的截图相比)。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

05101520253035404550Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø44 (24-46)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø45.6 (42-49)
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø46.8 (44-50)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 117.3 96.2 58.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 125 73.3 43.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 91.1 90.3 84 82.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 51.9 40
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 83.8 68.3 56
Far Cry 5 (2018) 64 62 58
Strange Brigade (2018) 120 95.7 82.3
God of War (2022) 42 34.8 23.4
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) 87 84 56
Dying Light 2 (2022) 33.7 28.5
GRID Legends (2022) 72.4 66.4 58.8
Elden Ring (2022) 38.8 37.9 37.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 41.7 30.7 27.7
Elex 2 (2022) 36.9 35.9 33.2
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 60 46.4 35.8
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) 86.7 77.2 76.6
F1 22 (2022) 70 61 22
The Quarry (2022) 49 40.3 31.7

排放

噪声排放

风扇控制并不是戴尔的拿手好戏。Inspiron 15 Plus在这方面也有改进的余地。尽管在空闲使用的较长时间里,风扇经常在一个合适的水平上持续运行,甚至完全关闭,但在执行假定无害的任务时,如与办公室工作、视频和网络浏览有关的任务时,笔记本在静音/安静和可听阶段之间波动(=不必要的速度增加),这可能会使一些买家感到恼火。

一般来说,15英寸机在负载情况下是非常容易听到的。46至48 dB(A)代表了一个明显的可听水平,这对于配备RTX 3050的中端笔记本电脑来说有点令人失望。我们本以为会像华硕VivoBook 15 Pro或戴尔XPS 15那样,在这里有一个较低的噪音水平。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 28 / 32 dB(A)
Load
47 / 48 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.438.240.23641.82537.635.735.734.235.93146.243.447.142.945.94033.831.331.526.4385023.525.129.722.940.66326.130.631.923.929.78033.423.224.124.136.910037.5232019.336.5125232320.320.324.116024.126.422.221.325.420025.831.124.421.826.925027.524.824.123.227.631527.921.123.722.12840030.117.219.416.829.950029.319.120.818.330.263032.717.421.817.432.980033.514.920.314.133.8100034.915.119.713.334.8125036.814.820.411.936.5160036.714.620.911.536.5200036.21321.311.435.9250035.513.219.111.434.9315034.91317.312.434.5400037.31322.713.136.950003913.617.414.838.86300391416.814.83980003613.518.314.235.31000031.613.217.213.731.21250028.912.814.81328.41600022.412.315.112.721.2SPL48.12832.126.747.9N6.21.11.70.96.2median 33.5median 14.8median 20.3median 14.2median 33.8Delta4.542.23.34.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell Inspiron 15 Plus
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise
5%
9%
17%
12%
off / environment *
26
24.4
6%
24.8
5%
23.8
8%
22.8
12%
Idle Minimum *
26
24.4
6%
24.8
5%
23.8
8%
22.9
12%
Idle Average *
28
24.4
13%
24.8
11%
23.8
15%
22.9
18%
Idle Maximum *
32
24.4
24%
26.4
17%
23.8
26%
22.9
28%
Load Average *
47
48.3
-3%
42.8
9%
36
23%
33.2
29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
48.9
-6%
42.8
7%
36
22%
47.3
-3%
Load Maximum *
48
48.9
-2%
42.8
11%
38.2
20%
52.8
-10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

与竞争对手相比,机箱的温度也高于平均水平--尽管CPU比较弱。在用FurMark和Prime95工具进行的压力测试中,顶部的温度高达50℃(约122°F),而底部的温度高达51℃(约124°F)。机箱的闲置温度也不是最佳状态,在30°C(约86°F)至38°C(约100°F)。

Max. Load
 50 °C50 °C46 °C 
 45 °C46 °C41 °C 
 37 °C36 °C35 °C 
Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 42.9 °C
49 °C51 °C48 °C
47 °C49 °C45 °C
39 °C40 °C41 °C
Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 45.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.2 °C / -14.8 F).
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
4%
24%
19%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
46.4
7%
37.8
24%
45.5
9%
36
28%
Maximum Bottom *
51
54.8
-7%
48.4
5%
44.2
13%
47.2
7%
Idle Upper Side *
38
31.4
17%
24
37%
27
29%
37
3%
Idle Bottom *
36
36.6
-2%
25.1
30%
26.7
26%
39.2
-9%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

关于组件还有几句话。虽然GPU时钟速度在压力测试中没有显示出任何重大波动,但CPU节流到了800MHz。

压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3

发言人

除了低沉的音调(微弱的低音)之外,Inspiron 15 Plus的声音绝对是值得尊敬的。根据我们的音频分析,其声音在多媒体笔记本电脑中属于中上水平。最大音量为78 dB(A),还算不错。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203642.52534.235.23142.945.14026.434.55022.929.96323.935.88024.136.910019.333.512520.337.516021.341.220021.845.625023.25131522.154.640016.860.150018.364.763017.469.180014.169.7100013.368.5125011.967.8160011.563.9200011.462.8250011.459.4315012.464.1400013.165.5500014.866.6630014.868.8800014.267.51000013.764125001357.21600012.749.8SPL26.778.2N0.943.7median 14.2median 63.9Delta3.38.537.733.737.724.828.124.822.324.522.324.424.324.425.322.625.328.424.228.430.823.130.833.221.733.236.620.836.642.718.242.744.816.444.849.517.149.553.915.653.958.314.558.363.113.863.166.813.266.868.512.468.567.211.867.264.811.664.857.511.557.560.611.460.657.811.457.856.511.856.56112.1616511.86564.81264.863.512.163.554.612.654.649.911.649.942.811.342.875.324.475.336.40.636.4median 57.8median 12.1median 57.88.82.48.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Inspiron 15 PlusDell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

能源消耗

戴尔仍然需要优化笔记本电脑的能源消耗。闲置时9到15瓦的能耗比竞争对手要高一些。即使在负载情况下,对于这种配置的笔记本电脑来说,15英寸的产品也不是特别节俭。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.9 / 1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9 / 11 / 15 Watt
Load midlight 97 / 129 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-1%
28%
15%
21%
10%
Idle Minimum *
9
7.7
14%
4.7
48%
7.6
16%
5.5
39%
7.2 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=95, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Average *
11
10.7
3%
9.4
15%
9.9
10%
7.4
33%
11.6 ?(4.6 - 43, n=95, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
15
16.8
-12%
10
33%
10.8
28%
14.9
1%
14.4 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=95, last 2 years)
4%
Load Average *
97
100.39
-3%
74.3
23%
81
16%
78.2
19%
76.5 ?(14.3 - 147, n=94, last 2 years)
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
100.1
108
-8%
67.7
32%
76.2
24%
80.1
20%
Load Maximum *
129
129
-0%
106.9
17%
131
-2%
110.9
14%
118.1 ?(44 - 247, n=94, last 2 years)
8%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø100.1 (88.6-107.4)
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø110.3 (104.3-128.7)

Energy consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø57.9 (57.3-60.6)
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø72.4 (58.1-85.6)
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø89.4 (84.8-97.9)
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø94.5 (87-109.6)

电池寿命

尽管Inspiron 15 Plus具有图形切换功能(Nvidia Optimus),但电池寿命只能算中等水平。高于平均水平的功耗和适度的电池容量相结合,使该设备无法实现引人注目的速率。在理想条件下(无负荷,最低亮度),单次充电不可能超过9小时。

在现实世界的情况下,如通过Wi-Fi浏览互联网(亮度降低到150cd/m²),你可以期待6小时左右--这也不是一个好结果。16英寸的兄弟姐妹机型由于其更大的电池(86瓦特对56瓦特),可以管理大约10个小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 48min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 14min
Dell Inspiron 15 Plus
i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 56 Wh
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Asus Zenbook Pro 15 OLED UM535Q
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 96 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
123%
21%
31%
168%
55%
Reader / Idle
528
1230
133%
1571
198%
933 ?(506 - 1571, n=25, last 2 years)
77%
WiFi v1.3
356
591
66%
498
40%
420
18%
766
115%
561 ?(262 - 1204, n=93, last 2 years)
58%
Load
74
199
169%
75
1%
106
43%
215
191%
97 ?(39 - 215, n=74, last 2 years)
31%
H.264
725
624
690 ?(319 - 1481, n=50, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra
74
81.8 ?(57 - 104, n=5, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 带隐私快门的网络摄像头
+ 尺寸紧凑
+ 高品质外壳
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 重量适中
+ 雷电4
+ 优雅的设计

Cons

- 长时间或大量使用时,CPU会出现节流现象
- 电池寿命可能会更好
- 只有8GB的内存(单通道)
- 负载下的高排放
- 平庸的风扇控制
- 做工不足
- 读卡器速度慢

判决书

戴尔Inspiron 15 Plus:测试设备由德国Nvidia提供
戴尔Inspiron 15 Plus:测试设备由德国Nvidia提供

戴尔Inspiron 15 Plus理论上有可能成为一个全能型的产品。

除了我们的评测样品有做工方面的缺陷(油漆损坏,触摸板边缘不平整),高质量的外壳看起来很时尚,而且由于其适度的尺寸和合理的重量,它可以很好地随身携带。大多数买家也会对输入设备和声音感到满意。

然而,最终得分只有 "好 "而不是 "非常好 "的事实主要是由于电池寿命差。连接性、风扇控制和负载下的速率(温度、时钟速率......)也可以做得更好。

然而,Inspiron 15 Plus推荐给那些有预算意识的用户,他们正在寻找一台移动的、多功能的全能型笔记本电脑(例如学生)。

另外,还值得一看的是华硕VivoBook 15 Pro配备(光面)OLED显示屏,价格在1,000欧元(约1,008美元)范围内。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时,戴尔Inspiron 15 Plus 7510似乎在美国还没有上市。不过,你可以关注一下网站,如亚马逊看看该设备是否出现在那里。

Dell Inspiron 15 Plus - 07/12/2022 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 78%
Weight
65 / 20-72 → 86%
Battery
68 / 95 → 72%
Display
84%
Games Performance
86 / 90 → 95%
Application Performance
93 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
78%
Noise
78 / 95 → 82%
Audio
76%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
75%
84%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 戴尔Inspiron 15 Plus笔记本电脑评测。接近于完美的全能型产品
Florian Glaser, 2022-07-16 (Update: 2022-07-16)