惠普Pavilion 14笔记本电脑评测：时尚的全能手，屏幕也很亮

Name: HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Brand: HP

决定性的风扇。 借助Pavilion 14-ce3040ng，惠普推出了基于英特尔全新Ice Lake架构的1,000欧元（约合1,109美元）的全能笔记本。正如我们的测试结果所示，这台14英寸显示器有一些奇怪的特点。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 03/05/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Ice Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng

Processor

Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake-U

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1519 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 441.87, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4-3200, 单通道

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO543D, IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)

Storage

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 GB

, M.2 NVMe-SSD

Soundcard

Intel Ice Point-LP PCH - cAVS

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机和麦克风插孔组合, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC

Networking

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 327 x 226

Battery

41 Wh Lithium-Ion, 41瓦•时锂电池

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65-watt power supply, Quick Start Guide, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.55 kg, Power Supply: 222 g

Price

1000 EUR

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
77.8 %	03/2020	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250	1.6 kg	18 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
84.9 %	02/2020	Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL i5-8265U, GeForce MX250	1.4 kg	15.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
84.2 %		Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	1.8 kg	17.95 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.6 %	09/2019	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	1.8 kg	18 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Device comparison

Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Asus VivoBook S15 S532F HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=65, last 2 years)	93.6 MB/s +193%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	82.9 MB/s +159%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	69.1 MB/s +116%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)	33.3 MB/s +4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	32 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia (16.8 - 266, n=61, last 2 years)	123.2 MB/s +273%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	89.9 MB/s +172%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	81.8 MB/s +148%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)	35.6 MB/s +8%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	33 MB/s


359 cd/m²	378 cd/m²	359 cd/m²
375 cd/m²	395 cd/m²	376 cd/m²
378 cd/m²	382 cd/m²	377 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO543D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 375.4 cd/m² Minimum: 28 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 395 cd/m²
Contrast: 1519:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.69 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.78

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL NV140FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-40%	-40%	-44%
Display P3 Coverage	66.5	40.1 -40%	40.02 -40%	37.12 -44%
sRGB Coverage	98.4	59.2 -40%	58.5 -41%	55.9 -43%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	68.2	41.43 -39%	41.34 -39%	38.35 -44%
Response Times		14%	8%	39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	60.8 ?(29.2, 31.6)	39.6 ?(21.6, 18) 35%	45 ?(23, 22) 26%	24.8 ?(12.8, 12) 59%
Response Time Black / White *	29.6 ?(13.2, 16.4)	32 ?(18, 14) -8%	33 ?(18, 15) -11%	24 ?(14, 10) 19%
PWM Frequency		352.1 ?(99)	250 ?(90)
Screen		-55%	-50%	-69%
Brightness middle	395	316 -20%	278 -30%	262.3 -34%
Brightness	375	301 -20%	271 -28%	250 -33%
Brightness Distribution	91	88 -3%	89 -2%	89 -2%
Black Level *	0.26	0.28 -8%	0.26 -0%	0.43 -65%
Contrast	1519	1129 -26%	1069 -30%	610 -60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.92	5.3 10%	4.73 20%	5.81 2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.79	18.5 -89%	8.38 14%	14.7 -50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.91	4.8 -427%	5.17 -468%	5.36 -489%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.69	2.4 64%	2.59 61%	2.8 58%
Gamma	2.78 ^79%	2.05 ^107%	2.38 ^92%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	7596 ^86%	6644 ^98%	6160 ^106%	7016 ^93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	63	37.6 -40%	36 -43%	35.2 -44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	98	58.3 -41%	58 -41%	55.6 -43%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-27% / -43%	-27% / -41%	-25% / -51%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.2 ms rise
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 29.2 ms rise
60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 31.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø548 (543.22-613.69)

Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)

Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=97, last 2 years)	251 Points +32%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7	190 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U	168 Points -12%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U	165 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U	152 Points -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=104, last 2 years)	2311 Points +234%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7	691 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U	680 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U	600 (548.41^min - 619.74^max) Points -13%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U	493 Points -29%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=95, last 2 years)	645 Points +36%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7	474 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U	401 Points -15%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U	390 Points -18%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=95, last 2 years)	5314 Points +244%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7	1543 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U	1367 Points -11%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U	1035 Points -33%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

691 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

190 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=83, last 2 years)	6586 Points +54%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	4289 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4236 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4192 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4148 Points -3%

	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-22%	-39%	-36%
Write 4K	181.6	157.6 -13%	130.1 -28%	149.9 -17%
Read 4K	57.4	46.39 -19%	27.64 -52%	46.13 -20%
Write Seq	1982	1214 -39%	1438 -27%	970 -51%
Read Seq	1899	1295 -32%	1319 -31%	1085 -43%
Write 4K Q32T1	509	370.7 -27%	323.3 -36%	460.8 -9%
Read 4K Q32T1	545	461.1 -15%	359.9 -34%	410.3 -25%
Write Seq Q32T1	3072	1888 -39%	1454 -53%	662 -78%
Read Seq Q32T1	3281	3540 8%	1740 -47%	1728 -47%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3281 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3072 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 545 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 509 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1899 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1982 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 181.6 MB/s

3DMark 11 Performance		4850 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1223 points
Help

... in comparison

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02: Ø11.2 (7-15)

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=88, last 2 years)	13863 Points +287%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL NVIDIA GeForce MX250	3720 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F NVIDIA GeForce MX250	3705 Points +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L NVIDIA GeForce MX250	3616 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250	3580 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=88, last 2 years)	5251 Points +375%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F NVIDIA GeForce MX250	1111 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250	1105 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L NVIDIA GeForce MX250	1090 Points -1%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=87, last 2 years)	18743 Points +306%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL NVIDIA GeForce MX250	4942 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F NVIDIA GeForce MX250	4756 Points +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L NVIDIA GeForce MX250	4633 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng NVIDIA GeForce MX250	4614 Points

The Witcher 3
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=63, last 2 years)	139.3 fps +316%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	37.9 fps +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	36.8 fps +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL GeForce MX250, i5-8265U	34.5 fps +3%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7	33.5 (26^min) fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=90, last 2 years)	92.7 fps +393%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	20.4 fps +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL GeForce MX250, i5-8265U	19.8 fps +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	19.1 fps +2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7	18.8 (15^min) fps

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	56.4	33.5	18.8	10.9
Resident Evil 7 (2017)	118	53.9	32.1	27
Prey (2017)	108	46.2	36.4	30.1
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	64	27	19	15
ELEX (2017)	53.9	25.4	20.6	15.6
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)	79.1	25.4	21.8	18.7
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	50.7	21.9	18.7	12.7
The Crew 2 (2018)	43.9	20.2	19.5	16.5
Control (2019)	41	14	10.1
Borderlands 3 (2019)	52.9	20.7	13.4	10.2
FIFA 20 (2019)	120	82.4	76.8	62.5
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)	36	19	17	12
GRID 2019 (2019)	65.2	25.2	20.3	11.8
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019)	41.7	23.3	19.4	15.9
Need for Speed Heat (2019)	41.1	20.2	18.4	15.3
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)		29.4	22.5	18.1
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)	20.9	15.2	9.8	6.2

Noise Level

Idle		31 / 36 / 41 dB(A)
Load		49 / 49 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250	Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL i5-8265U, GeForce MX250	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	Average of class Multimedia
Noise		20%	13%	16%	22%
off / environment *	30	29.3 2%	29.9 -0%	28 7%	24.1 ?(19.4 - 26.5, n=93, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Minimum *	31	29.3 5%	29.9 4%	28 10%	24.5 ?(20.1 - 31.8, n=93, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Average *	36	29.3 19%	29.9 17%	28 22%	25 ?(20.1 - 31.8, n=93, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Maximum *	41	29.3 29%	29.9 27%	30 27%	26.5 ?(20.1 - 36.8, n=93, last 2 years) 35%
Load Average *	49	34.4 30%	41.7 15%	41.4 16%	39.8 ?(24.2 - 59.7, n=92, last 2 years) 19%
Witcher 3 ultra *	47	34.4 27%		41.5 12%
Load Maximum *	49	34.9 29%	41.7 15%	41.5 15%	47.5 ?(29.6 - 62.9, n=93, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42 °C	47 °C	46 °C
32 °C	45 °C	46 °C
27 °C	31 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 38.7 °C


46 °C	47 °C	38 °C
42 °C	39 °C	29 °C
28 °C	26 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 35.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


24 °C	25 °C	25 °C
23 °C	24 °C	25 °C
23 °C	23 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 25 °C
Average: 24 °C


26 °C	26 °C	25 °C
26 °C	26 °C	24 °C
24 °C	24 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 26 °C
Average: 24.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 23 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


40 °C	47 °C	45 °C
32 °C	46 °C	45 °C
28 °C	32 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 38.6 °C


45 °C	46 °C	40 °C
41 °C	40 °C	30 °C
32 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 36.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).

	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250	Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL i5-8265U, GeForce MX250	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	Average of class Multimedia
Heat		5%	-15%	-6%	-5%
Maximum Upper Side *	47	41.8 11%	53.7 -14%	45.4 3%	43.9 ?(26 - 67, n=95, last 2 years) 7%
Maximum Bottom *	47	43.3 8%	56 -19%	40.8 13%	46.4 ?(25 - 69, n=95, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Upper Side *	25	25.1 -0%	28.4 -14%	29.6 -18%	28.5 ?(21.2 - 41.7, n=93, last 2 years) -14%
Idle Bottom *	26	25.4 2%	28.9 -11%	31.2 -20%	29.3 ?(21.4 - 39.8, n=93, last 2 years) -13%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.7 Watt
Idle	4 / 7 / 10 Watt
Load	62 / 64 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250	Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL i5-8265U, GeForce MX250	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		12%	1%	-25%	-61%
Idle Minimum *	4	2.74 31%	4.4 -10%	6 -50%	7.29 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=94, last 2 years) -82%
Idle Average *	7	5.64 19%	6.9 1%	10.3 -47%	11.7 ?(4.6 - 43, n=94, last 2 years) -67%
Idle Maximum *	10	8.4 16%	9.9 1%	10.5 -5%	14.5 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=94, last 2 years) -45%
Load Average *	62	61.3 1%	55 11%	69.1 -11%	77.7 ?(14.3 - 147, n=93, last 2 years) -25%
Witcher 3 ultra *	58	49.2 15%		57.8 -0%
Load Maximum *	64	69.4 -8%	63.4 1%	88 -38%	120.2 ?(47.7 - 247, n=93, last 2 years) -88%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		11h 34min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 9min

	HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		49%	31%	1%	43%
Reader / Idle	694	1281 85%	773 11%	655 -6%	933 ?(506 - 1571, n=25, last 2 years) 34%
WiFi v1.3	368	505 37%	414 13%	306 -17%	569 ?(274 - 1204, n=93, last 2 years) 55%
Load	69	87 26%	117 70%	86 25%	97.6 ?(39 - 215, n=74, last 2 years) 41%
H.264		495	388		698 ?(319 - 1481, n=51, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 高质量的做工（材料，建筑质量）

+ 对比度高且明亮的屏幕

+ 紧凑的尺寸

+ 轻巧时尚的设计

Cons

- 接口较差

- 键盘不够好

- 漏光

- 烦人的风扇噪音

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

乍一看，Pavilion 14-ce3040ng给人留下了很好的印象。

部分由铝制成的时尚外观设计给我们以轻巧紧凑的印象。这使得该设备特别适合在旅途中使用。

其明亮，对比度高的显示屏是另一个卖点，使14英寸屏幕在竞争中脱颖而出。另一方面，它的输入设备，连接性和续航时间只算中规中矩。

惠普在风扇曲线方面犯了决定性的错误。风扇即使在空载时也达到40 dB（A），在负载下也达到近50 dB（A）。在当前状态下，我们建议您将目光投向其他地方，除非您不会被喧闹而烦人的风扇所劝退。

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng - 2020-05-14 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis

75 / 98 → 77%

Keyboard

73%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

52 / 80 → 65%

Weight

68 / 20-72 → 93%

Battery

70 / 95 → 73%

Display

84%

Games Performance

62 / 90 → 69%

Application Performance

90 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

87%

Noise

64 / 95 → 67%

Audio

75%

Camera

35 / 85 → 41%

Average

71%

78%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9867 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 386552 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普Pavilion 14笔记本电脑评测：时尚的全能手，屏幕也很亮

Florian Glaser, 2020-03- 5 (Update: 2020-03- 5)