Notebookcheck Logo

惠普Pavilion 14笔记本电脑评测：时尚的全能手，屏幕也很亮

决定性的风扇。

借助Pavilion 14-ce3040ng，惠普推出了基于英特尔全新Ice Lake架构的1,000欧元（约合1,109美元）的全能笔记本。 正如我们的测试结果所示，这台14英寸显示器有一些奇怪的特点。
Ice Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Processor
Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake-U
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1519 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 441.87, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, 单通道
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO543D, IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Storage
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, M.2 NVMe-SSD
Soundcard
Intel Ice Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机和麦克风插孔组合, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 327 x 226
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Ion, 41瓦•时锂电池
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65-watt power supply, Quick Start Guide, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.55 kg, Power Supply: 222 g
Price
1000 EUR
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
77.8 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2020
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250		1.6 kg18 mm14.00"1920x1080
84.9 %
v6 (old)
02 / 2020
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250		1.4 kg15.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
84.2 %
v7 (old)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250		1.8 kg17.95 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.6 %
v6 (old)
09 / 2019
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250		1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080

Device comparison

❌
363.4 mm 243.5 mm 17.95 mm 1.8 kg357.2 mm 230.3 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg327 mm 226 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg323 mm 227 mm 15.9 mm 1.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia
  (21.1 - 198, n=41, last 2 years)
98.5 MB/s +208%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.9 MB/s +159%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
69.1 MB/s +116%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
33.3 MB/s +4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia
  (27.4 - 262, n=41, last 2 years)
140.2 MB/s +325%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s +172%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.8 MB/s +148%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
35.6 MB/s +8%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s
359
cd/m²		378
cd/m²		359
cd/m²
375
cd/m²		395
cd/m²		376
cd/m²
378
cd/m²		382
cd/m²		377
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO543D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 375.4 cd/m² Minimum: 28 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 395 cd/m²
Contrast: 1519:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.92 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.69 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.78
CCT: 7596 K
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"		Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NV140FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"		Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
-40%
-40%
-44%
Display P3 Coverage (%)
66.5
40.1
-40%
40.02
-40%
37.12
-44%
sRGB Coverage (%)
98.4
59.2
-40%
58.5
-41%
55.9
-43%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)
68.2
41.43
-39%
41.34
-39%
38.35
-44%
Response Times
14%
8%
39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)
60.8 ?(29.2, 31.6)
39.6 ?(21.6, 18)
35%
45 ?(23, 22)
26%
24.8 ?(12.8, 12)
59%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)
29.6 ?(13.2, 16.4)
32 ?(18, 14)
-8%
33 ?(18, 15)
-11%
24 ?(14, 10)
19%
PWM Frequency (Hz)
352.1 ?(99)
250 ?(90)
Screen
-55%
-50%
-69%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
395
316
-20%
278
-30%
262.3
-34%
Brightness (cd/m²)
375
301
-20%
271
-28%
250
-33%
Brightness Distribution (%)
91
88
-3%
89
-2%
89
-2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.26
0.28
-8%
0.26
-0%
0.43
-65%
Contrast (:1)
1519
1129
-26%
1069
-30%
610
-60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.92
5.3
10%
4.73
20%
5.81
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.79
18.5
-89%
8.38
14%
14.7
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.91
4.8
-427%
5.17
-468%
5.36
-489%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.69
2.4
64%
2.59
61%
2.8
58%
Gamma
2.78 79%
2.05 107%
2.38 92%
2.15 102%
CCT
7596 86%
6644 98%
6160 106%
7016 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%)
63
37.6
-40%
36
-43%
35.2
-44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%)
98
58.3
-41%
58
-41%
55.6
-43%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-27% / -43%
-27% / -41%
-25% / -51%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.2 ms rise
↘ 31.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8142 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø548 (543.22-613.69)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (99.6 - 323, n=64, last 2 years)
265 Points +39%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
190 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U
168 Points -12%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
165 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
152 Points -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (856 - 5224, n=67, last 2 years)
2510 Points +263%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
691 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U
680 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
600 (548.41min - 619.74max) Points -13%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
493 Points -29%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (420 - 853, n=61, last 2 years)
693 Points +46%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
474 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
401 Points -15%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
390 Points -18%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (1887 - 11924, n=61, last 2 years)
6073 Points +294%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1543 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
1367 Points -11%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
1035 Points -33%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
691 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1543 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
474 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (4325 - 8670, n=54, last 2 years)
6904 Points +61%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4289 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4236 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4192 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4148 Points -3%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02		Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-22%
-39%
-36%
Write 4K (MB/s)
181.6
157.6
-13%
130.1
-28%
149.9
-17%
Read 4K (MB/s)
57.4
46.39
-19%
27.64
-52%
46.13
-20%
Write Seq (MB/s)
1982
1214
-39%
1438
-27%
970
-51%
Read Seq (MB/s)
1899
1295
-32%
1319
-31%
1085
-43%
Write 4K Q32T1 (MB/s)
509
370.7
-27%
323.3
-36%
460.8
-9%
Read 4K Q32T1 (MB/s)
545
461.1
-15%
359.9
-34%
410.3
-25%
Write Seq Q32T1 (MB/s)
3072
1888
-39%
1454
-53%
662
-78%
Read Seq Q32T1 (MB/s)
3281
3540
8%
1740
-47%
1728
-47%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3281 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3072 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 545 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 509 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1899 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1982 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 181.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
4850 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1223 points
Help
0510Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02: Ø11.2 (7-15)
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (2328 - 48907, n=62, last 2 years)
14235 Points +298%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3720 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3705 Points +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3616 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3580 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (696 - 19403, n=63, last 2 years)
5479 Points +396%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1111 Points +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1105 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1090 Points -1%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3765 - 60002, n=58, last 2 years)
19748 Points +328%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4942 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4756 Points +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4633 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4614 Points
The Witcher 3
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (41 - 327, n=16, last 2 years)
128.5 fps +284%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
37.9 fps +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
36.8 fps +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, i5-8265U
34.5 fps +3%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7
33.5 (26min) fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (22 - 242, n=29, last 2 years)
93.6 fps +398%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
20.4 fps +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, i5-8265U
19.8 fps +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
19.1 fps +2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7
18.8 (15min) fps
lowmed.highultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 56.4 33.5 18.8 10.9
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 118 53.9 32.1 27
Prey (2017) 108 46.2 36.4 30.1
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 64 27 19 15
ELEX (2017) 53.9 25.4 20.6 15.6
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 79.1 25.4 21.8 18.7
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 50.7 21.9 18.7 12.7
The Crew 2 (2018) 43.9 20.2 19.5 16.5
Control (2019) 41 14 10.1
Borderlands 3 (2019) 52.9 20.7 13.4 10.2
FIFA 20 (2019) 120 82.4 76.8 62.5
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 36 19 17 12
GRID 2019 (2019) 65.2 25.2 20.3 11.8
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 41.7 23.3 19.4 15.9
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 41.1 20.2 18.4 15.3
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 29.4 22.5 18.1
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 20.9 15.2 9.8 6.2
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.234.534.132.632.733.62537.543.643.735.836.837.43130.133.53330.129.231.34034.335.432.435.132.835.35039.1323338.627.940.66338.538.140.134.529.438.18035.633.7283427.23510040.228.125.427.725.240.812530.829.126.527.726.83216031.53329.734.22832.220028.727.225.427.623.828.625029.925.124.526.521.730.731528.825.722.322.920.428.640033.425.823.121.119.333.55003325.322.320.719.132.463033.12622.620.817.533.78003426.523.51816.934.110003527.724.417.717.335.2125036.929.326.219.418.436.8160038.930.626.918.217.138.9200039.531.728.617.816.839.7250040.333271816.840.231504128.122.917.916.940.54000392420.717.91739500033.822.419.518.217.333.763003220.418.417.81732800027.11918.318.116.727.11000024.518.618.21816.724.11250023.218.618.218.116.722.51600022.51918.31816.620SPL49.340.336.531.529.749.3N6.53.22.41.71.36.5median 33.1median 26median 23.1median 18.2median 17.3median 33.5Delta4.33.33.532.24.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng

Noise level

Idle
31 / 36 / 41 dB(A)
Load
49 / 49 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250		Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250		Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250		Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250		Average of class Multimedia
 
Noise
20%
13%
16%
23%
off / environment * (dB)
30
29.3
2%
29.9
-0%
28
7%
24.1 ?(22.2 - 27.3, n=63, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Minimum * (dB)
31
29.3
5%
29.9
4%
28
10%
24.3 ?(22.2 - 27.3, n=63, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Average * (dB)
36
29.3
19%
29.9
17%
28
22%
24.8 ?(22.2 - 30.6, n=63, last 2 years)
31%
Idle Maximum * (dB)
41
29.3
29%
29.9
27%
30
27%
26.7 ?(22.2 - 34, n=63, last 2 years)
35%
Load Average * (dB)
49
34.4
30%
41.7
15%
41.4
16%
38 ?(23.7 - 57.6, n=61, last 2 years)
22%
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)
47
34.4
27%
41.5
12%
Load Maximum * (dB)
49
34.9
29%
41.7
15%
41.5
15%
45.3 ?(29.4 - 57.8, n=63, last 2 years)
8%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 42 °C47 °C46 °C 
 32 °C45 °C46 °C 
 27 °C31 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
46 °C47 °C38 °C
42 °C39 °C29 °C
28 °C26 °C25 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 35.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-3.3 °C / -5.9 F).
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250		Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250		Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250		Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250		Average of class Multimedia
 
Heat
5%
-15%
-6%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side * (°C)
47
41.8
11%
53.7
-14%
45.4
3%
42.5 ?(31.8 - 55, n=64, last 2 years)
10%
Maximum Bottom * (°C)
47
43.3
8%
56
-19%
40.8
13%
45.1 ?(33 - 59.4, n=64, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Upper Side * (°C)
25
25.1
-0%
28.4
-14%
29.6
-18%
27.7 ?(21.2 - 39.2, n=63, last 2 years)
-11%
Idle Bottom * (°C)
26
25.4
2%
28.9
-11%
31.2
-20%
28.5 ?(21.4 - 38.3, n=63, last 2 years)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.730.82536.835.53129.229.74032.836.65027.939.56329.437.38027.235.610025.232.512526.832.51602834.620023.842.725021.75631520.461.440019.367.350019.170.163017.572.580016.967.7100017.369.1125018.472.4160017.176.7200016.873.5250016.872315016.973.240001775.7500017.375.163001773800016.766.61000016.770.11250016.767.91600016.655.3SPL29.785N1.363.7median 17.3median 69.1Delta2.28.532.63028.626.626.826.527.828.124.32823.225.223.52523.232.22135.120.641.121.150.720.653.120.453.620.558.919.861.419.560.318.85718.462.117.561.217.362.516.85716.257.115.956.215.66015.655.115.449.215.241.915.243.61538.714.742.329.370.51.226.6median 17.5median 55.12.59hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngLenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4 / 7 / 10 Watt
Load midlight 62 / 64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250		Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250		Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250		Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250		Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
12%
1%
-25%
-41%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
4
2.74
31%
4.4
-10%
6
-50%
5.93 ?(2.1 - 31.3, n=64, last 2 years)
-48%
Idle Average * (Watt)
7
5.64
19%
6.9
1%
10.3
-47%
10.3 ?(4.6 - 38.3, n=64, last 2 years)
-47%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
10
8.4
16%
9.9
1%
10.5
-5%
12.5 ?(6 - 41.6, n=64, last 2 years)
-25%
Load Average * (Watt)
62
61.3
1%
55
11%
69.1
-11%
68.8 ?(15.1 - 129.3, n=60, last 2 years)
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)
58
49.2
15%
57.8
-0%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
64
69.4
-8%
63.4
1%
88
-38%
112.5 ?(40 - 270, n=63, last 2 years)
-76%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
11h 34min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 9min
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh		Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh		Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh		Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 Wh		Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery runtime
49%
30%
-2%
73%
Reader / Idle (h)
11.6
21.4
84%
12.9
11%
10.9
-6%
22 ?(10.2 - 46, n=8, last 2 years)
90%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
6.1
8.4
38%
6.9
13%
5.1
-16%
11.4 ?(4.37 - 19.6, n=64, last 2 years)
87%
Load (h)
1.2
1.5
25%
2
67%
1.4
17%
1.688 ?(0.833 - 2.77, n=33, last 2 years)
41%
H.264 (h)
8.3
6.5
15.8 ?(8.3 - 24.6, n=30, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 高质量的做工（材料，建筑质量）
+ 对比度高且明亮的屏幕
+ 紧凑的尺寸
+ 轻巧时尚的设计

Cons

- 接口较差
- 键盘不够好
- 漏光
- 烦人的风扇噪音
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

乍一看，Pavilion 14-ce3040ng给人留下了很好的印象。

部分由铝制成的时尚外观设计给我们以轻巧紧凑的印象。这使得该设备特别适合在旅途中使用。

其明亮，对比度高的显示屏是另一个卖点，使14英寸屏幕在竞争中脱颖而出。 另一方面，它的输入设备，连接性和续航时间只算中规中矩。

惠普在风扇曲线方面犯了决定性的错误。风扇即使在空载时也达到40 dB（A），在负载下也达到近50 dB（A）。在当前状态下，我们建议您将目光投向其他地方，除非您不会被喧闹而烦人的风扇所劝退。

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng - 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis
75 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
73%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
52 / 80 → 65%
Weight
68 / 20-72 → 93%
Battery
70 / 95 → 73%
Display
84%
Games Performance
62 / 90 → 69%
Application Performance
90 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
64 / 95 → 67%
Audio
75%
Camera
35 / 85 → 41%
Average
71%
78%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普Pavilion 14笔记本电脑评测：时尚的全能手，屏幕也很亮
Florian Glaser, 2020-03- 5 (Update: 2024-11- 4)