Notebookcheck

华为Matebook 14 (i7-8565U, GeForce MX250) 笔记本电脑评测

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by Zewei Shen), 07/08/2019
Geforce Laptop / Notebook Touchscreen Ultrabook Whiskey Lake

3:2超极本 MateBook 14比2018 MateBook X Pro性能更强,同时提供不常见的3:2屏幕。虽然功能强大,但CPU Turbo Boost还是比较一般,而且考虑到7000元的要价,Thunderbolt 3的缺乏有些不应该。

Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 (MateBook Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8565U
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 MB, Core: 1518 MHz, Memory: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 430.39, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, 1200 MHz, 10-10-10-28, 双通道,板载内存
Display
14 inch 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixel 185 PPI, 十点触控, Chi Mei CMN8C02, IPS, P140KZA-BZ1, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
,
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.9 x 307.5 x 223.8
Battery
57.4 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: 巧克力背光键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, PC Manager, Huawei Connect, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.53 kg, Power Supply: 197 g
Price
1500欧元(国行无相同配置) Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

322.6 mm 210.8 mm 15.2 mm 994 g322 mm 227 mm 14.9 mm 1.4 kg316 mm 195 mm 12.9 mm 1.1 kg307.5 mm 223.8 mm 15.9 mm 1.5 kg304 mm 217 mm 14.6 mm 1.3 kg302 mm 199 mm 11.6 mm 1.2 kg
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: USB Type-C (DisplayPort and Charging), 3.5 mm combo audio, HDMI
Left: USB Type-C (DisplayPort and Charging), 3.5 mm combo audio, HDMI
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: USB 2.0, USB 3.0
Right: USB 2.0, USB 3.0
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
660 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
655 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
530 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
513 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
505 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
393.5
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
384.7
cd/m²
383.9
cd/m²
401.7
cd/m²
379.8
cd/m²
380.9
cd/m²
384.4
cd/m²
382.5
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei CMN8C02
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 401.7 cd/m² Average: 386.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.71 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 401.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 956:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.11 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.36
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
Chi Mei CMN8C02, IPS, 14, 2160x1440
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9, 3000x2000
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN
Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 13.3, 3840x2160
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9, 1920x1080
Response Times
0%
-4%
-8%
-43%
-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38 (19.6, 18.4)
40.4 (19.2, 21.2)
-6%
36.8 (19.6, 17.2)
3%
47.2 (23.6, 23.6)
-24%
58 (26, 32)
-53%
40.8 (20.4, 20.4)
-7%
Response Time Black / White *
27.2 (17.2, 10)
25.6 (11.6, 14)
6%
30 (18.4, 11.6)
-10%
24.8 (14, 10.8)
9%
36 (20, 16)
-32%
27.6 (15.6, 12)
-1%
PWM Frequency
Screen
9%
-6%
21%
1%
-17%
Brightness middle
401.7
442.7
10%
333.8
-17%
466
16%
404
1%
316
-21%
Brightness
386
428
11%
307
-20%
462
20%
389
1%
291
-25%
Brightness Distribution
95
84
-12%
83
-13%
90
-5%
85
-11%
83
-13%
Black Level *
0.42
0.31
26%
0.4
5%
0.33
21%
0.37
12%
0.36
14%
Contrast
956
1428
49%
835
-13%
1412
48%
1092
14%
878
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.11
2.24
45%
3.54
14%
1.93
53%
3.72
9%
5.9
-44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.93
7.19
19%
5.8
35%
4.26
52%
7.38
17%
12.9
-44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.36
1.11
18%
2.36
-74%
1.99
-46%
2.06
-51%
1.3
4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.1
9.7
-59%
4.7
23%
1.7
72%
4.44
27%
8.6
-41%
Gamma
2.19 100%
1.42 155%
2.14 103%
2.15 102%
2.34 94%
2.1 105%
CCT
7222 90%
6227 104%
6261 104%
6382 102%
7095 92%
6854 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.7
61.6
-2%
61.2
-2%
62.2
-1%
60
-4%
60.7
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98.6
95
-4%
94.7
-4%
95.7
-3%
93
-6%
94.5
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / 8%
-5% / -6%
7% / 16%
-21% / -6%
-11% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 18.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13539 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø522 (514.22-659.49)
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø485 (464.55-537.4)
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, 8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø627 (623.29-676.66)
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø614 (574.66-670.36)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
Intel Core i7-8565U
177 Points ∼81%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U
174 Points ∼80% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (73.1 - 193, n=48)
170 Points ∼78% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
166 Points ∼76% -6%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
147 Points ∼67% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points ∼67% -18%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
146 Points ∼67% -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
141 Points ∼65% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
818 Points ∼19% +25%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
Intel Core i7-8565U
656 Points ∼15%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U
651 Points ∼15% -1%
Huawei MateBook D, AMD Edition
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
642 (min: 589.88, max: 641.56) Points ∼15% -2%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
640 Points ∼15% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (361 - 815, n=49)
586 Points ∼13% -11%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Intel Core i5-8250U
516 Points ∼12% -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
514 Points ∼12% -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points ∼8% -48%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
177 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
656 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
105.22 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
3704 Points ∼29% +6%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
GeForce MX250, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3488 Points ∼27%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3125 Points ∼24% -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
2872 Points ∼22% -18%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
2751 Points ∼21% -21%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2735 Points ∼21% -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (534 - 4338, n=97)
2523 Points ∼19% -28%
Productivity
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
GeForce MX250, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6916 Points ∼66%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
6575 Points ∼63% -5%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
6101 Points ∼59% -12%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5886 Points ∼56% -15%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
5749 Points ∼55% -17%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5727 Points ∼55% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1014 - 7281, n=97)
5281 Points ∼51% -24%
Essentials
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
8373 Points ∼73% 0%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
GeForce MX250, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8367 Points ∼73%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
8033 Points ∼70% -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7165 Points ∼63% -14%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
7132 Points ∼62% -15%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7083 Points ∼62% -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2062 - 9664, n=97)
6902 Points ∼60% -18%
Score
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
4219 Points ∼52% 0%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
GeForce MX250, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4205 Points ∼52%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3835 Points ∼47% -9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3546 Points ∼44% -16%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
3463 Points ∼43% -18%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3445 Points ∼42% -18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 4609, n=100)
3200 Points ∼39% -24%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
5065 Points ∼77% +6%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
GeForce MX250, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4796 Points ∼73%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
4520 Points ∼69% -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4417 Points ∼67% -8%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4339 Points ∼66% -10%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
4302 Points ∼65% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1283 - 5363, n=221)
4067 Points ∼62% -15%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
3873 Points ∼64% +7%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
GeForce MX250, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3612 Points ∼59%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3519 Points ∼58% -3%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3478 Points ∼57% -4%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
3218 Points ∼53% -11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3183 Points ∼52% -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1027 - 4211, n=249)
3046 Points ∼50% -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3612 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4796 points
Help
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
AS SSD
-25%
-70%
-45%
-15%
-55%
Copy Game MB/s
1215.69
486.26
-60%
520.7
-57%
617.61
-49%
901.52
-26%
340.01
-72%
Copy Program MB/s
473.63
312.26
-34%
259.33
-45%
287.93
-39%
402.43
-15%
209.69
-56%
Copy ISO MB/s
1837.24
739.44
-60%
513.76
-72%
893.32
-51%
1404.23
-24%
539.41
-71%
Score Total
3743
2575
-31%
1040
-72%
1479
-60%
3250
-13%
1373
-63%
Score Write
1653
620
-62%
378
-77%
471
-72%
1468
-11%
427
-74%
Score Read
1369
1329
-3%
431
-69%
704
-49%
1185
-13%
657
-52%
Access Time Write *
0.026
0.036
-38%
0.055
-112%
0.051
-96%
0.027
-4%
0.056
-115%
Access Time Read *
0.046
0.058
-26%
0.092
-100%
0.061
-33%
0.053
-15%
0.069
-50%
4K-64 Write
1376.69
399.62
-71%
263.12
-81%
300.07
-78%
1251.44
-9%
266.32
-81%
4K-64 Read
1190.11
1039.05
-13%
352.87
-70%
460.96
-61%
1020.66
-14%
434.3
-64%
4K Write
137.58
103.13
-25%
66.14
-52%
105.65
-23%
126.18
-8%
94.98
-31%
4K Read
56.44
48.33
-14%
30.57
-46%
39.74
-30%
41.46
-27%
38.04
-33%
Seq Write
1385.7
1169.65
-16%
487.41
-65%
657.79
-53%
906.95
-35%
661.05
-52%
Seq Read
1225.02
2415.81
97%
476.13
-61%
2034.83
66%
1223.82
0%
1849.93
51%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1775 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1720 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 611.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 571.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 962 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1009 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 28.04 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 165.9 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H
6112 Points ∼15% +67%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4239 Points ∼10% +16%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
3726 Points ∼9% +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 8565U
3664 Points ∼9%
MSI PX60 6QD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
3638 Points ∼9% -1%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
3586 Points ∼9% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (2939 - 3885, n=18)
3565 Points ∼9% -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
2793 Points ∼7% -24%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2069 Points ∼5% -44%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
1740 Points ∼4% -53%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1194 Points ∼3% -67%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H
39072 Points ∼20% +73%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
29742 Points ∼15% +32%
MSI PX60 6QD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
25900 Points ∼13% +15%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 8565U
22615 Points ∼12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (19117 - 23863, n=16)
21984 Points ∼11% -3%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
21755 Points ∼11% -4%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
21260 Points ∼11% -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
17345 Points ∼9% -23%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
10816 Points ∼6% -52%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
9904 Points ∼5% -56%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
9643 Points ∼5% -57%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
5417 Points ∼24% +19%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 8565U
4552 Points ∼20%
MSI PX60 6QD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
4501 Points ∼20% -1%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
4394 Points ∼19% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3532 - 4638, n=18)
4276 Points ∼19% -6%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
4163 Points ∼18% -9%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3567 Points ∼16% -22%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2395 Points ∼11% -47%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
1872 Points ∼8% -59%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1548 Points ∼7% -66%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ
4938 Points ∼10% +11%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
4905 Points ∼10% +10%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
4514 Points ∼9% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3593 - 4942, n=18)
4482 Points ∼9% +1%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 8565U
4459 Points ∼9%
MSI PX60 6QD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
4384 Points ∼9% -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3450 Points ∼7% -23%
HP EliteBook 735 G5 3UN62EA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
2907 Points ∼6% -35%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2613 Points ∼5% -41%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1757 Points ∼3% -61%
3DMark 11 Performance
4681 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
13455 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3350 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1240 points
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
91.5 fps ∼100% +151%
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
72.5 fps ∼79% +99%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
38.2 fps ∼42% +5%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
36.5 fps ∼40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (32.9 - 38.7, n=16)
36.1 fps ∼39% -1%
Asus GL552JX-CN154H
Intel Core i7-4720HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
35.6 fps ∼39% -2%
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
32.5 fps ∼36% -11%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
23 fps ∼25% -37%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
95 fps ∼100% +117%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
44.6 fps ∼47% +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
43.7 fps ∼46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (39 - 46.2, n=5)
41.8 fps ∼44% -4%
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
36.9 fps ∼39% -16%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
26.5 fps ∼28% -39%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
17.4 fps ∼18% -60%
010203040Tooltip
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø37.2 (35-39)
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 64.5 36.5 21 11.9 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 74.9 43.7 24.1 19.4 fps
Overwatch (2016) 171.7 122.5 58 35 fps
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
GeForce MX250, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN
GeForce MX150, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
GeForce MX150, 8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
Noise
-0%
3%
-1%
3%
-3%
off / environment *
28.1
27.9
1%
28.2
-0%
28.1
-0%
29.3
-4%
28.4
-1%
Idle Minimum *
28.1
27.9
1%
28.4
-1%
28.1
-0%
29.3
-4%
28.5
-1%
Idle Average *
28.1
27.9
1%
28.4
-1%
28.1
-0%
29.3
-4%
29
-3%
Idle Maximum *
29.7
27.9
6%
28.4
4%
29
2%
29.7
-0%
29.1
2%
Load Average *
31.2
36.2
-16%
35.7
-14%
41.1
-32%
31.8
-2%
42.8
-37%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44.5
45
-1%
41.1
8%
41.4
7%
Load Maximum *
47.5
45.2
5%
34.2
28%
41.1
13%
32.7
31%
41.6
12%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
28.1 / 28.1 / 29.7 dB(A)
Load
31.2 / 47.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)
Max. Load
 48.2 °C47 °C35.4 °C 
 45.4 °C45.2 °C31 °C 
 36.8 °C31.4 °C29.6 °C 
Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 38.9 °C
38.2 °C53.6 °C53.4 °C
34.6 °C44.6 °C48 °C
33.6 °C39 °C41.8 °C
Maximum: 53.6 °C
Average: 43 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 40 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (-8.2 °C / -14.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.541.42538.838.63137.837.14037.939.75035.138.46336.837.68035.635.910034.43712534.242.116033.650.420031.955.925031.363.231530.667.840029.971.250029.474.163029.373.580028.672.7100028.374.2125028.372160027.570.8200027.466.8250027.565.1315027.362.740002761.4500026.860.863002767.5800026.969.81000026.967.31250026.758.41600026.659.9SPL4081.5N3.854median 28.3median 66.8Delta25.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.39 / 0.79 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.7 / 9.3 / 12.8 Watt
Load midlight 58.8 / 65 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
8565U, GeForce MX250, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2160x1440, 14
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN
8565U, GeForce MX150, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
8565U, GeForce MX150, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Power Consumption
11%
40%
18%
21%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
3.7
3.5
5%
2.7
27%
3.4
8%
3.3
11%
6.7
-81%
Idle Average *
9.3
8.9
4%
6
35%
6.3
32%
6.8
27%
8.6
8%
Idle Maximum *
12.8
12.3
4%
6.5
49%
10.4
19%
9.5
26%
9.4
27%
Load Average *
58.8
54.2
8%
32.5
45%
51
13%
40.8
31%
64.1
-9%
Load Maximum *
65
52.1
20%
35.5
45%
62.7
4%
57
12%
64.1
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55.8
42.4
24%
39
30%
63.7
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
23h 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 49min
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
8565U, GeForce MX250, 57.4 Wh
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh
Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN
8565U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Battery Runtime
7%
48%
0%
4%
8%
Reader / Idle
1435
1243
-13%
2238
56%
1032
-28%
1710
19%
1432
0%
WiFi v1.3
503
557
11%
720
43%
498
-1%
506
1%
550
9%
Load
109
133
22%
159
46%
141
29%
99
-9%
124
14%

Pros

+ 即使不插电也是满血性能
+ 100%的sRGB覆盖率,高对比度
+ 可升级的M.2 SSD和WLAN
+ 25 W GeForce MX250 GPU
+ 低负荷时安静的风扇
+ USB Type-C充电
+ 高品质的机身
+ 锐利的3:2屏幕
+ 大面积触控板
+ HDMI端口

Cons

- 只有一个USB Type-C端口用于充电,数据和DP接口
- 25 W MX250性能几乎与25 W MX150相同
- 屏幕色准较差
- 游戏时充电速度非常慢
- 有限的CPU Turbo Boost性能
- 没有雷电3或SD读卡器
- 网络摄像头角度较差
- 游戏噪音较大
- 键盘键反馈太软
- 板载RAM
华为MateBook 14 KLV-W29 笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by Huawei US
华为MateBook 14 KLV-W29 笔记本电脑评测. Test unit provided by Huawei US

MateBook 14使Microsoft Surface Laptop看起来有些过时。毫无疑问,它在功能,做工,屏幕以及特别是图形性能方面都是更优质的3:2笔记本电脑,价格相同。如果独特的宽高比和相对高性能的GPU的组合很吸引人,那么MateBook 14将适合您。

但是,如果你的目的主要是多媒体播放或游戏,而不是文字处理或浏览,那么更传统的配备雷电3接口的16:9超级本,如华硕ZenBook S13 UX392Razer Blade Stealth将更合适。 MateBook 14中的MX250与MateBook 13中的MX150相比几乎没有提升,CPU Turbo Boost性能仍然很弱。

即将推出的2019 MateBook X Pro将采用与MateBook 14完全相同的CPU和GPU选项,但采用更加纤薄的机身,配备更多USB Type-C端口和更高分辨率的触摸屏。当然,缺点是高昂的价格,相比之下,MateBook 14的价格则略低。如果您发现MateBook X Pro很具有吸引力但是价格较高,那么MateBook 14应该是值得一看。我们更加建议使用Core i5-8265U的SKU,因为它和i7版本性能上几乎完全相同。

Core i7-8565U CPU和25 W的GeForce MX250 GPU与MateBook 13上的Core i7-8550U和25 W GeForce MX150提升极小。虽然它是市场上最好的3:2超极本之一,但它仍然可以在端口选项,触控板反馈和网络摄像头放置方面做得更好。

Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 - 05/06/2019 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
91 /  98 → 92%
Keyboard
82%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
56 / 80 → 70%
Weight
69 / 35-78 → 78%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
77 / 68 → 100%
Application Performance
93 / 87 → 100%
Temperature
83 / 91 → 91%
Noise
90%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
61 / 85 → 71%
Average
79%
87%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为Matebook 14 (i7-8565U, GeForce MX250) 笔记本电脑评测
Allen Ngo, 2019-07- 8 (Update: 2019-07- 8)