结论
联想的LOQ系列通常是值得信赖的选择。该系列笔记本电脑将坚固的机身与优质的输入设备、丰富的接口以及实用显示屏完美结合。任何寻求一款特别引人注目的游戏本的用户，都会在我们的测试配置中发现许多值得称道之处。 其大胆的配色方案使其在竞争对手中脱颖而出，赋予这款15英寸机型鲜明的个性。联想甚至还附赠了一只同色系的绿色鼠标。在硬件配置方面，两个内存插槽和双M.2插槽尤为亮眼，其中一个M.2插槽仍可用于未来的升级。 性能强劲的双风扇散热系统也让硬件得以充分发挥潜力。因此，GeForce RTX 5060 在此款设备上的表现比许多同类设备略胜一筹。不过，音质和电池续航时间仍处于中游水平。总体而言，这款色彩鲜艳的联想游戏本获得了81%的不错评分。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
灰色款联想 LOQ 15AHP11 目前可在多家欧洲在线零售商处购买，包括Galaxus，起售价约为1,500欧元。这大致相当于1,300英镑或1,750美元，不过各地的实际价格、税费及供货情况可能因地区而异。
- $899.99Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15.6" FHD 144Hz Display, Intel Core i5-12450HX, GeForce RTX 2050, 12GB DDR5, 512GB SSD, Wi-Fi 6, Backlit
- $1,299.99Lenovo LOQ 15.3" WUXGA IPS 165Hz AI-Powered Gaming Notebook AMD Ryzen 7 250 16GB RAM 512GB SSD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Luna Grey
- $1,429.00Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop 15.6" FHD IPS 144Hz (100% sRGB G-SYNC) AMD Quad-core Ryzen 5 7235HS 32GB RAM 1TB SSD GeForce RTX 4050 Backlit Nahimic Privacy Camera Rapid Charge Win11 w/ICP Hub
Table of Contents
规格
机箱、功能和输入设备
塑料机身足够坚固，铰链的180°开合角度尤为突出。在做工方面也无可挑剔。这款新机型重2.2公斤，比其 前代机型，虽然设计上基本相似，但在细节处（例如接口和铰链设计）存在诸多差异，不过它比 XMG Core 15 和 Legion 5 15等机型，后两者的重量仅为1.9公斤。等机型——后两者的重量仅为1.9公斤。 除了RJ45接口、HDMI 2.1输出端口和音频插孔外，该机型还配备了共计四个USB接口，其中一个是支持USB 4的Type-C接口，包含DisplayPort 1.4和100 W的Power Delivery功能。遗憾的是，机身未配备读卡器。
Realtek 提供的内置 Wi-Fi 6 模块性能仅属一般；这一方面仍有很大的改进空间。网络摄像头在机身侧面设有遮光板，其分辨率比大多数竞品更为清晰。 拆下 10 颗十字螺丝即可打开机身。在输入设备方面，用户可以期待典型的联想品质，其外观和手感都十分出色。无论是键盘还是触控板，都让我们几乎挑不出毛病。我们特别喜欢其布局以及尺寸宽大的方向键。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Gaming (872 - 4473, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Realtek RTL8852BE (872 - 906, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average of class Gaming (788 - 3208, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Average Realtek RTL8852BE (788 - 996, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
显示
虽然有些游戏本——尤其是低价位机型——在显示屏方面，更具体地说是在色彩还原方面有所欠缺，但联想在这方面并未偷工减料。 尽管LOQ 15未能覆盖AdobeRGB或DCI-P3色域，但对绝大多数用户而言，完全覆盖sRGB色域已经绰绰有余。 我们测得平均亮度为277 cd/m²，这一数值既不算差，也不算特别出色。对比度约为970:1，情况也是如此。 得益于出厂预校准，这块 165 Hz 面板的色彩显得相当自然，可视角度也符合典型的 IPS 标准。联想采用了 1,920 x 1,200 像素的分辨率，屏幕宽高比为 16:10。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 291 cd/m²
Contrast: 970:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.36 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
79.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
78.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.128
CCT: 7012 K
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 B153UAN02.J (AUO5DBA), IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 165 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 300 Hz | Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -10% | 17% | -6% | -47% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 78.8 | 67.3 -15% | 99.9 27% | 71.7 -9% | 38.8 -51% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.8 | 99.2 -1% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 58.4 -41% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 79.6 | 69.1 -13% | 98.3 23% | 73.6 -8% | 40.1 -50% |
| Response Times | -222% | 95% | 4% | -186% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 10.7 ? | 33.9 ? -217% | 0.42 ? 96% | 12.4 ? -16% | 29.3 ? -174% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 6.5 ? | 21.2 ? -226% | 0.4 ? 94% | 5 ? 23% | 19.4 ? -198% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1152 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 11 | ||||
| Screen | 22% | 54% | 5% | -31% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 291 | 318 9% | 492 69% | 545 87% | 332 14% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 277 | 300 8% | 495 79% | 530 91% | 314 13% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 88 | 89 1% | 92 5% | 94 7% | 82 -7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.3 | 0.2 33% | 0.54 -80% | 0.2 33% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 970 | 1590 64% | 1009 4% | 1660 71% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.36 | 1.33 44% | 0.9 62% | 2.29 3% | 4.57 -94% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.12 | 4.42 -7% | 1.8 56% | 5.42 -32% | 12.82 -211% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.9 24% | 1.2 52% | 3.5 -40% | 4.1 -64% |
| Gamma | 2.128 103% | 2.187 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.317 95% | 2.023 109% |
| CCT | 7012 93% | 6678 97% | 6291 103% | 6957 93% | 6838 95% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.94 | 1.05 | 3.95 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -70% /
-23% | 55% /
51% | 1% /
2% | -88% /
-58% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 10.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7753 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
表现
就性能而言，我们测试的 LOQ 15AHP11 属于中端机型。虽然 16 GB 内存到 2026 年仍能满足基本需求，但 512 GB 的 SSD 存储空间确实不算充裕。
测试条件
您可以使用 Fn+Q 快捷键在多个配置文件之间切换。我们的测试是在“性能”模式下进行的。您可以在下表中查看其他模式的对比情况。
| 模式 | 静音 | 平衡 | 性能 |
| 《赛博朋克2077》噪音水平 | 39 dB(A) | 44 dB(A) | 48 dB(A) |
| 《赛博朋克2077》帧率（FHD/极高画质） | 70.4 fps | 79.4 fps | 88.5 fps |
| GPU功耗 | 60 W | 80 W | 105 W |
| CPU PL1 | 30 W | 40 W | 43 W |
| CPU PL2 | 50 W | 50 W | 53 W |
| Cinebench R15 多核得分 | 2,039 分 | 2,358 分 | 2,464 分 |
处理器性能
联想采用了广受欢迎的 AMD Ryzen 7 250 处理器。这款基于Zen 4架构的八核处理器最多可同时处理16个线程，并搭载了 Radeon 780M。在CPU基准测试中，这款4纳米芯片的表现符合预期，尽管其前代产品在硬件配置完全相同的情况下，在此项测试中速度略快一些，而 锐龙 7 260 和 AI 7 350 以及 Core 7 250H 的性能领先幅度超过10%，不过在实际使用中，你可能很少能察觉到这一点。
Cinebench R15 多核耐力测试
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (10227 - 85542, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (19614 - 24783, n=5) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (51376 - 238426, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (79019 - 98709, n=5) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2180 - 9817, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (3817 - 4563, n=5) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (12847 - 14798, n=5) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (25115 - 128721, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (42572 - 53836, n=5) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (68090 - 85430, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (850 - 1074, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (5509 - 45446, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (10504 - 13039, n=5) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (12271 - 89891, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (22645 - 40403, n=5) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统和存储性能
整体系统性能与上一代 LOQ 机型非常接近。遗憾的是，经过长时间使用后，NVMe SSD 在持续负载下再次出现了性能降频现象。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) -3! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5828 - 11574, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (7304 - 8136, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 11935, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (9343 - 10292, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (9226 - 14114, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6845 - 21327, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (7602 - 19657, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (11083 - 11137, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1366 - 2409, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (1577 - 1746, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1386 - 2254, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (1580 - 1764, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1343 - 2729, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (1640 - 1757, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1226 - 2334, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (1392 - 1664, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (220 - 532, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (165 - 354, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (534 - 551, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (391 - 590, n=102, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8136 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 129946, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (35172 - 68811, n=5) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 118858, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (29534 - 60683, n=5) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 135096, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (40057 - 86628, n=5) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 259, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (94.1 - 103, n=5) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
持续读取性能：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度为 8
GPU 和游戏性能
该 GeForce RTX 5060 是英伟达Blackwell架构中颇具吸引力的显卡之一，尽管8 GB显存在当今看来已不算突出。得益于其充裕的TGP，LOQ 15在性能模式下的表现相较于竞品相当出色，甚至在3DMark测试中夺得榜首。 正如我们的基准测试所示，在日常游戏中的表现同样令人印象深刻。在全高清分辨率下，几乎所有游戏即使在最高画质设置下也能运行得非常流畅，因此你很少需要启用DLSS或帧生成技术。在我们针对 《赛博朋克2077》的长期测试中，帧率也保持得相当稳定。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 32742 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 60539 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 28839 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12163 points | |
Help | ||
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| XMG Fusion 16 M25 | |
| 007 First Light | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Settings AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (57.3 - 86.6, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (55.2 - 60.4, n=3) | |
| XMG Fusion 16 M25 | |
| 1920x1080 High Settings AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (60.2 - 90.6, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (57.7 - 62.8, n=3) | |
| XMG Fusion 16 M25 | |
| Pragmata - 1920x1080 Quality Preset | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| XMG Fusion 16 M25 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (80.6 - 83.1, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.66 - 119.4, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Death Stranding 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (47.2 - 51.7, n=3) | |
| XMG Fusion 16 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.22 - 74.3, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (61.6 - 64.5, n=3) | |
| XMG Fusion 16 M25 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9.45 - 97.2, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Crimson Desert | |
| 1920x1080 Cinematic Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (49.9 - 78, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| XMG Fusion 16 M25 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (49.9 - 55.9, n=3) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (60 - 89.8, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| XMG Fusion 16 M25 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (60 - 67.3, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Resident Evil Requiem | |
| 1920x1080 Max Settings + High Ray Tracing (no upscaling) | |
| Average of class Gaming (46.7 - 65.4, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (43.4 - 47.7, n=3) | |
| XMG Fusion 16 M25 | |
| 1920x1080 High Settings (no upscaling) | |
| Average of class Gaming (90.4 - 114.8, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| XMG Fusion 16 M25 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (90.4 - 94.1, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 115 | 111.5 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 70.2 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 98.5 | 88.5 | ||
| Resident Evil Requiem (2026) | 90.4 | 47.7 | ||
| Death Stranding 2 (2026) | 64.5 | 51.7 | ||
| Crimson Desert (2026) | 62.8 | 55.1 | ||
| Pragmata (2026) | 83.1 | |||
| 007 First Light (2026) | 62.8 | 60.4 |
《赛博朋克2077》超高清帧率图表
排放与能源
噪声排放
与之前的评测机型不同——该机型似乎存在一个空闲状态下的故障，导致空闲时的噪音水平和功耗异常高——新款机型并未出现此类问题。尽管如此，在轻度负载下，LOQ 15 的噪音仍比许多竞品笔记本更大；而在“性能”模式下，其风扇的转速提升频率仍高于实际需要。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 29 / 30 / 37 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43 / 50 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Core 7 250H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -25% | 8% | 4% | -4% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25 | 25 -0% | 25.5 -2% | 24 4% | 25 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 29 | 43 -48% | 25.5 12% | 25 14% | 27 7% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 30 | 45 -50% | 25.5 15% | 27 10% | 29 3% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 37 | 48 -30% | 26.9 27% | 29 22% | 32 14% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 43 | 53 -23% | 34.6 20% | 48 -12% | 50 -16% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 44 | 51 -16% | 50.1 -14% | 49 -11% | 55 -25% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 50 | 53 -6% | 50.1 -0% | 50 -0% | 56 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在满载状态下，机箱部分区域的温度超过了50 °C。在我们使用FurMark和Prime95进行的压力测试中，CPU温度达到约77 °C，而GPU温度则稳定在约87 °C。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Core 7 250H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 4% | 16% | 3% | 15% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 53 | 49 8% | 42.2 20% | 49 8% | 43 19% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 58 | 58 -0% | 51.7 11% | 59 -2% | 52 10% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 32 | 28.5 | 28 | 31 | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 29 | 29.2 | 31 | 32 |
* ... smaller is better
演讲嘉宾
整体音质处于中等水平。与大多数笔记本电脑一样，尤其是低音部分，力度还可以更强一些。
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
功耗与电池续航时间
LOQ 15 在空闲状态下的能效非常高，平均功耗仅略低于 7 瓦，但在极端负载下功耗会攀升至近 200 瓦。因此，随附的 245 瓦电源适配器功率绰绰有余。60 瓦时的电池容量相当可观，为这款 15 英寸笔记本电脑提供了令人满意的续航时间。 在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，LOQ 15 的网页浏览续航时间约为 7 小时。得益于更大的电池容量，Legion 5 和 XMG Core 15 的续航时间更长。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.8 Watt |
| Idle | 3 / 6.8 / 11.5 Watt |
| Load |
67 / 197 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Core 7 250H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -142% | -34% | -68% | -100% | -141% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3 | 20 -567% | 6.9 -130% | 10.6 -253% | 13.7 -357% | 12.9 ? -330% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6.8 | 20.7 -204% | 10.7 -57% | 12.1 -78% | 14.7 -116% | 18.5 ? -172% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 11.5 | 22.7 -97% | 11.3 2% | 15.9 -38% | 17.9 -56% | 24.1 ? -110% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 67 | 71 -6% | 69.7 -4% | 95 -42% | 110 -64% | 108.4 ? -62% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 167 | 153.1 8% | 162.6 3% | 169 -1% | 177.9 -7% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 197 | 172 13% | 233.6 -19% | 192 3% | 191 3% | 254 ? -29% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 151.1 | 165 | 165 | 177.2 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Core 7 250H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 53 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -36% | 39% | 41% | -26% | 1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 7 | 4.5 -36% | 9.7 39% | 9.9 41% | 5.2 -26% | 7.08 ? 1% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 6.9 | 8.71 ? | ||||
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.51 ? | |||
| H.264 (h) | 11.5 | 8.9 ? | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 0.9 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
联想 LOQ 15 的亮绿色版本堪称一道亮丽的风景线，令人过目难忘。游戏玩家还可以期待它带来稳健的中端性能表现。
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11
- 07/06/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代方案一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.1%  | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1500 EUR | 2.2 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS |
2. 77.5%  | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
3. 87.2%  | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1449€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED |
4. 84.7%  | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1840 EUR | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI IPS |
5. 78.6%  | Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Intel Core 7 250H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: List Price: 1300 EUR | 2.2 kg | 29 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
