结论：RTX 5060 的成功竞争者
经过所有测试，XMG 酷睿 15 被证明是一款强大的 RTX 5060 游戏笔记本电脑，在大多数方面（包括制造质量、端口、键盘和触摸板、显示屏、电池续航时间和音频）都获得了良好到非常好的分数。但仍有改进的余地，尤其是散热性能，在负载情况下散热性能相对较高。85% 的总体得分与其竞争对手联想Legion 5 几乎持平，后者在评测中的得分为 87%。
去年的 XMG Core 15 M24 配备了 Ryzen 7 8845HS 和GeForce RTX 4060，而 2025 版则采用了更现代化的硬件。买家可以选择 Ryzen AI 7 350、Ryzen AI 9 365 或 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 处理器，搭配GeForce RTX 5060 或 RTX 5070，每个处理器都有 8 GB GDDR7 VRAM。每款机型都配备了明亮的 300 Hz IPS 显示屏，格式为 16:10，分辨率为 2,560 × 1,600。内存容量从 8 GB 到 128 GB 不等（两个 SO-DIMM 插槽），内部有两个 M.2 SSD 插槽。
15 英寸机型的起价为 1549 欧元。我们的测试机配备了 Ryzen 7 350、RTX 5060、64 GB 内存、2 TB 固态硬盘和 Windows 11 Pro，售价约为 1,850 欧元，考虑到 GPU 性能，这个价格已经很高了。
Pros
+ 固态硬盘和内存各两个插槽
+ 可定制配置
+ 明亮的显示屏
+ 高品质机箱
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 出色的电池寿命
+ 端口丰富
Cons
- 负载时温度较高
- 价格昂贵
- 只有 8GB VRAM
竞争对手包括其他基于 Blackwell 的游戏笔记本电脑，如 联想 LOQ 15、前面提到的 Legion 5 15以及 Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1和 微星卡塔纳 17 HX都出现在比较表中。
规格
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) (XMG Core 15 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 8 x 2 - 5 GHz, 105 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Krackan Point (Zen 5)
Graphics adapter
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1560 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 115 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, ForceWare 581.29, Optimus
Memory
64 GB
, 2x 32 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)
Display
15.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1600 pixel 197 PPI, NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F), IPS, FreeSync, glossy: no, 300 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, 2048 GB
, two M.2 2280 slots (one empty)
Weight
1.94 kg, Power Supply: 617 g
Price
1840 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
除了键盘背光外，机壳相当朴素但坚固。与其 前代一样，该机箱来自裸机专家同方，由于采用了大面积的金属嵌件（例如，在Legion 5 上，只有盖子是金属的），因此给人一种坚固和高品质的感觉。显示屏可以完全打开 180 度，这并不常见。制造质量和铰链强度也令人印象深刻，让人毫无怨言。机身重量为 1.9 千克，相对较轻，与Legion 5 大致相当。
设备
如照片所示，连接功能既广泛又先进。内置无线模块（Wi-Fi 6E），尤其是读卡器的速度令人印象深刻。网络摄像头（包括隐私快门）效果不错，由于采用全高清分辨率，图像比某些竞争对手更清晰。拧松 10 颗十字螺丝后，底板即可取下。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (20 - 210, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IAH G10 RTX 5060 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
交流
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø937 (766-1032)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (788-855)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1820 (1746-1921)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1282 (579-1471)
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (800-1238)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1189 (557-1301)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1745 (1723-1765)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (908-952)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1698 (1622-1727)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1617 (985-1684)
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1638 (1558-1687)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (616-1532)
网络摄像头
11.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
维护
输入设备
输入设备性能良好。键盘明亮、可调节的 RGB 灯光、精心设计的布局和宽大的方向键给人留下了深刻印象。触摸板光滑精确，尺寸为 12.3 x 7.6 厘米。
显示屏
制造商选用了 IPS 面板作为显示屏，平均亮度为 530 cd/m²，适合在明亮的房间和偶尔在室外使用。由于黑度不尽如人意（0.54 cd/m²），对比度只能达到约 1,000:1。Legion 5 的 OLED 面板在这方面的表现要好得多，但它必须面对强烈的反光。由于 DCI-P3 和 AdobeRGB 没有完全覆盖，买家只能满足于使用 sRGB 色彩空间。不过，开箱即用的色彩准确度已经不错了。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 545 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 530.2 cd/m² Minimum: 26 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 545 cd/m²
Contrast: 1009:1 (Black: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.29 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
calibrated: 1.05
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
73.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
71.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.317
CCT: 6957 K
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 300 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK CSOT MNH301CA3-1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 (BOE0C8E), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | 24% | -46% | 19% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 71.7 | 67.3 -6% | 99.9 39% | 37.7 -47% | 97.3 36% | 73.2 2% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 99.2 -1% | 100 0% | 56.3 -44% | 99.6 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 73.6 | 69.1 -6% | 98.3 34% | 39 -47% | 89 21% | 74.6 1% |
| Response Times | -249% | 95% | -137% | -13% | -31% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 12.4 ? | 33.9 ? -173% | 0.42 ? 97% | 21.4 ? -73% | 5.2 ? 58% | 9.6 ? 23% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 5 ? | 21.2 ? -324% | 0.4 ? 92% | 15 ? -200% | 9.2 ? -84% | 9.2 ? -84% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1152 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 11 | |||||
| Screen | 16% | 29% | -79% | 7% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 545 | 318 -42% | 492 -10% | 279 -49% | 296 -46% | 635 17% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 530 | 300 -43% | 495 -7% | 260 -51% | 272 -49% | 604 14% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 89 -5% | 92 -2% | 90 -4% | 87 -7% | 91 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.54 | 0.2 63% | 0.24 56% | 0.27 50% | 0.64 -19% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1009 | 1590 58% | 1163 15% | 1096 9% | 992 -2% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.29 | 1.33 42% | 0.9 61% | 4.97 -117% | 1.35 41% | 1.89 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.42 | 4.42 18% | 1.8 67% | 20.52 -279% | 4.76 12% | 3.14 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.05 | 0.94 10% | 4.58 -336% | 0.78 26% | 1.14 -9% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 1.9 46% | 1.2 66% | 1.7 51% | 2.7 23% | 2.53 28% |
| Gamma | 2.317 95% | 2.187 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.201 100% | 2.201 100% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6957 93% | 6678 97% | 6291 103% | 6937 94% | 6770 96% | 6434 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -79% /
-26% | 49% /
40% | -87% /
-80% | 4% /
6% | -7% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8228 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
测试条件
预装的控制中心提供各种功能和设置。玩家最感兴趣的是性能菜单，它提供三个配置文件（见表）。除电池测试外，所有测量均在禁用 GPU 超频的 Overboost 模式下进行。如果需要，还可以创建自定义配置文件。
| 模式 | Balanced | Enthusiast | Overboost |
| 赛博朋克 2077 噪音 | 34 dB(A) | 46 dB(A) | 49 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》性能（FHD/超高清） | 30 fps 锁定 | 79.1 fps | 84.3 fps |
| 赛博朋克 2077》GPU 功耗 | ~25 W | ~80 W | ~105 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 2204 分 | 2570 分 | 2753 分 |
| CPU PL1 | 45 W | 54 W | 70 W |
| CPU PL2 | 65 W | 65 W | 105 W |
处理器
......（英文 Ryzen AI 7 350 是一款八核处理器，能够通过 SMT 同时处理多达 16 个线程。在 Cinebench 循环测试中，这款 4 纳米芯片的性能相当稳定。在所有基准测试中，老款 XMG Core 15 的 Ryzen 7 8845HS稍快，而Legion 5 的 Ryzen 7 260性能大致相同。
Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2683 (2542.1-2734.48)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250: Ø2469 (2446.48-2543.88)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2777 (2734.48-2831.06)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Core 5 210H: Ø1790 (1711.45-1850.05)
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK Intel Core i7-14650HX: Ø2359 (2262.06-3142.01)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2849 (2832.66-2908.03)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (20203 - 28112, n=12) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (75098 - 108991, n=12) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (3395 - 4399, n=12) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (67317 - 77400, n=12) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (11916 - 13856, n=12) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (39456 - 58771, n=11) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (56915 - 87670, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (839 - 1138, n=12) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (10707 - 15203, n=11) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (25283 - 47405, n=12) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
系统性能
在系统测试中，新酷睿 15 几乎名列前茅，仅次于卡塔纳 17。然而，在内存基准测试中，申克笔记本电脑却名列第一。
Performance Rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Essentials
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Essentials
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 -1! | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=108, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (38001 - 106997, n=12) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (44209 - 63650, n=12) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (42604 - 110817, n=12) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87.7 - 109.8, n=12) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
延迟结果也很好。虽然 LatencyMon 工具提示了潜在的问题，但测量值仍然是测试组中最好的，也是最低的。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试配置采用的是三星公司生产的速度极快的 2 TB SSD。990 Pro 型固态硬盘在写入和读取方面都能提供较高且稳定的数值，但如果我们将联想 LOQ 15（有时在 Loop 基准测试中性能会大幅下降）排除在外，这也适用于竞争对手。
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7127 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
6953 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
484.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
519.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3446 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
4239 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
79.81 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
167.3 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6303 (5373.37-6345.56)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5490 (1238.79-7073.06)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6573 (6108.16-6593.26)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5817 (5172.14-5840.63)
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6759 (6226.78-6981)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7120 (6339.48-7142.87)
图形处理器性能
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 33080 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 50015 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 29119 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 11779 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
基于全高清测试，Core 15 在游戏基准测试中的成绩介于 LOQ15（-6%）和Legion 5（+5%）之间。对于大多数用户来说，QHD 高清范围更有意思，这里的结果符合该 GPU 的预期平均值。在 2,560 × 1,440/1,600 像素下，系统有时会很吃力，因此建议在需要时启用 DLSS 和多帧生成功能。例如 地狱之刃 2在没有附加功能的情况下，它在 QHD 下的运行速度只有生涩的 28 FPS。而在包含 DLSS 4 的情况下，则能达到稳定的 43 FPS。四倍帧生成甚至能确保 137 FPS，尽管帧时间并不理想。
Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 168, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (75 - 94.9, n=8) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (108.7 - 142.9, n=6) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 183.6 | 176.9 | 170.1 | 120.6 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 184.5 | 163.4 | 154.4 | 144.6 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 107.5 | 98.3 | 83.4 | |||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 115.7 | 94.1 | 93.3 | 62.6 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 107.3 | 93.5 | 84.3 | 53.5 | ||
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 78.3 | 60.6 | 60 | 60.6 | 47 | |
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 87.1 | 76.7 | 60.9 | 61.9 | 46.1 | |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 53.7 | 38.6 | 42.8 | 28.4 | ||
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 51.7 | 46.8 | 37.8 | 37.9 | 27.2 | |
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 78.7 | 77.4 | 76.7 | 70.3 | 54 | |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 84.9 | 62.5 | 47.9 | 43.5 | 33.2 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 58.8 | 52.3 | 44 | 70.1 | 32.4 | |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 106.3 | 86 | 60.4 | 57.4 | 43.6 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 61 | 54.9 | 29.2 | 30 | 13.8 | |
| Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) | 64.4 | 57.5 | 56.4 | 52.8 | 38.2 | |
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 42.8 | 34.7 | 28.7 | 21.2 | 21.9 | 11.5 |
Performance Rating | Horizon Forbidden West | Ghost of Tsushima | Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 | Star Wars Outlaws | Space Marine 2 | Until Dawn | Stalker 2 | Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 | The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered | Doom: The Dark Ages
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Horizon Forbidden West | |
| 2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (24.1 - 98, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (47 - 48.1, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| 2560x1440 Very High Preset + DLSS Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (58.4 - 116.6, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (59.9 - 60.6, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.7 - 41.7, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (12.7 - 13.8, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.3 - 59.7, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (25.3 - 30, n=2) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
像往常一样，我们用 赛博朋克 2077.XMG Core 15 表现稳定，没有出现明显的性能下降。
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø75.6 (72.4-76.9)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø80 (76.1-80.8)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø82.5 (77.1-83.6)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop: Ø69.1 (66.5-69.6)
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø89.2 (84-92.9)
排放量
噪音
在超增压模式下，3D 模式的噪音水平既不低也不高。赛博朋克 2077》中的 49 分贝（A）是基于Legion 5，达到 50 分贝（A）。空闲时风扇部分关闭，当风扇转动时，噪音保持在 27 到 29 分贝左右。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 27 / 29 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 48 / 50 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -33% | 4% | -7% | -15% | 8% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 25 -4% | 25.5 -6% | 24 -0% | 25 -4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25 | 43 -72% | 25.5 -2% | 27 -8% | 31 -24% | 23 8% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 27 | 45 -67% | 25.5 6% | 29 -7% | 32 -19% | 23 15% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 29 | 48 -66% | 26.9 7% | 32 -10% | 34 -17% | 23 21% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 48 | 53 -10% | 34.6 28% | 47 2% | 50 -4% | 38.92 19% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 49 | 51 -4% | 50.1 -2% | 55 -12% | 58 -18% | 52.06 -6% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 50 | 53 -6% | 50.1 -0% | 58 -16% | 59 -18% | 52.09 -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 50.96 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度结果喜忧参半。虽然在空闲时机箱温度基本保持在 30 °C以下，但在负载情况下，机箱顶部和底部的表面温度分别攀升至近 50 °C和 60 °C。这些读数与联想 LOQ 15 相似，而Legion 5 的运行温度更低。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | 8% | 5% | -6% | -15% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 49 | 49 -0% | 42.2 14% | 42 14% | 52 -6% | 52 -6% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 59 | 58 2% | 51.7 12% | 45 24% | 56 5% | 61 -3% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 28 | 32 -14% | 28.5 -2% | 30 -7% | 33 -18% | 35 -25% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 31 | 29 6% | 29.2 6% | 35 -13% | 32 -3% | 39 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，CPU 的温度几乎升至 89 °C，而 GPU 的温度则在 86 °C左右。
发言人
音质高于平均水平。与往常一样，低音还可以再强一些，但总体而言，Core 15 的表现不错，根据我们的音频分析，它的音质略好于Legion 5。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
能耗
申克笔记本电脑的耗电量低于许多竞争对手，尤其是在闲置状态下。外部显示器的耗电量取决于所使用的输出：Mini DisplayPort 和两个 HDMI 端口中的一个通过 dGPU 运行，而其他端口则使用 iGPU。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle | 10.6 / 12.1 / 15.9 Watt |
| Load |
95 / 192 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | 12% | -13% | -23% | -6% | -45% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 10.6 | 20 -89% | 6.9 35% | 13.5 -27% | 9.7 8% | 9.3 12% | 14.2 ? -34% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 12.1 | 20.7 -71% | 10.7 12% | 14.8 -22% | 15 -24% | 12.9 -7% | 20.2 ? -67% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 15.9 | 22.7 -43% | 11.3 29% | 22.9 -44% | 23.7 -49% | 12.8 19% | 27.3 ? -72% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 95 | 71 25% | 69.7 27% | 87 8% | 126 -33% | 111 ? -17% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 165 | 151.1 8% | 165 -0% | 171.9 -4% | 202 -22% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 169 | 153.1 9% | 162.6 4% | 173.4 -3% | 205 -21% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 192 | 172 10% | 233.6 -22% | 195 -2% | 227 -18% | 286 -49% | 263 ? -37% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 167 |
* ... smaller is better
能耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø173.8 (172.7-175.5)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.1 (10.6-15.9)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø169 (161.7-191.8)
带外部监控器的能耗
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø104.8 (103.3-110.8)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø110.6 (106.1-140.1)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø139.1 (137-146.6)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.1 (16.3-23.7)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø165 (160.2-170.2)
电池寿命
虽然电池续航时间不如前代酷睿 15，但在亮度为 150 cd/m² 的浏览器测试中，约 10 小时的续航时间仍然令人印象深刻，与Legion 5 的测试结果不相上下。
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 53 Wh | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 75 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -55% | -2% | -61% | -48% | 49% | -33% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9.9 | 4.5 -55% | 9.7 -2% | 3.9 -61% | 5.1 -48% | 14.8 49% | 6.63 ? -33% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 6.9 | 9.9 ? | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 1.432 ? | |||
| H.264 (h) | 11.5 | 10.1 | 7.85 ? | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 0.9 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
2025 XMG Core 15 继承了前代产品的高品质金属机身和良好的输入设备，同时增加了更新的端口和更新的硬件。除了相当昂贵的价格外，它几乎没有什么值得批评的地方。主要竞争对手 Legion 5 将不得不跟上。联想的主要优势在于其 OLED 面板--前提是你能忍受反光。
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25)
- 09/25/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.7%  | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 1840 EUR | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI IPS |
2. 77.5%  | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,439.00 Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15... 2. $120.99 20V 12.25A 245W Slim Tip Cha... 3. $75.99 Ruilezyo 300W Laptop Charger... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
3. 87.2%  | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,538.59 Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10 RTX ... 2. $1,149.99 Lenovo Legion 5 15.1" OLED W... 3. $1,553.31 Lenovo Legion 5 Gen 10 Gamin... List Price: 1449€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED |
4. 76.8%  | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Core 5 210H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | List Price: 1250 EUR | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
5. 77.3%  | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK Intel Core i7-14650HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $46.99 GVKRLXZ 230W AC Adapter Comp... 2. $12.99 Rujcloud HDMI 2.1 Cable for ... 3. $114.00 Black Laptop Backlit Keyboar... List Price: 1800 EUR | 2.7 kg | 28 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS |
6. 83.7%  | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1650 Euro | 2.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
