评语 - 没有预算外观的预算玩家（大部分情况下）
随着 Omen Max 取代高端机型的位置，惠普 2025 Omen 16 现在被定位为更经济实惠的机型。不过，你不会马上注意到这一点：它连贯的设计、稳固的输入设备和出色的 CPU/GPU 性能让人感觉它并不廉价。它是一款不折不扣的经济型游戏机。
尽管如此，我们还是少走了一些弯路。惠普节省了 Wi-Fi 和 USB 端口，这是可以接受的。电池容量较小是另一个小的折衷。不过，最大的遗憾是显示屏--并不糟糕，但明显低于当今的标准，缺乏视觉冲击力。如果惠普在低端配置上也能提供更好的屏幕，那么 Omen 16 将很容易成为我们向预算有限的游戏玩家推荐的首选。
Pros
+ 简洁、连贯的设计
+ 坚固的键盘和触摸板
+ 出色的 CPU/GPU 性能
+ 即使在负载情况下，表面温度也很低
Cons
- 易沾染指纹的表面
- 没有 USB 4、Thunderbolt 或 SD 读卡器
- 只有 Wi-Fi 6
- 不合格的显示屏，响应时间慢
- 广告泛滥的控制中心
- 单通道内存
- 电池容量相对较小
价格和供应情况
我们的测试机由 notebooksbilliger.de 提供，目前售价为 999 欧元。
$19.99
BestParts New CPU+GPU Cooling 12V Fan Replacement for HP OMEN 16-K 16-N (Only for RTX3060 RTX3070) TPN-Q280 TPN-Q281, P/N: N18100-001 N18099-001 12V
- $16.99Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling Fan Replacement for HP OMEN 16-K 16-N Pro TPN-Q280 0FPKK0000H DFS5K223052839 0FPKJ0000H DFS5L32G164865 N18090-001 N18091-001 DC5V
- $35.99Replacement Backlit Keyboard for HP Omen 16-U 16-U0013DX 16-U0020NR 16-U0057NR 16-U0097NR 16-U1047NR 16-WD 16-WD0013DX 16-WD0063DX 16-WD0073DX 16-WF 16-WF0083DX 16-WF0097NR
我们的 Omen 16 测试配置包括 Ryzen 9 8940HX, RTX 5060、16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘。虽然它不是最便宜的 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑，但其定价似乎仍然是预算与性能之间的一个不错的中间点。
惠普向更经济实惠的构建转变，这在 预兆 17(2024）上就已经可以明显看出惠普向更经济实惠的方向转变，而这款新的 Omen 16 显然也是在这一方向上继续前进。
规格
Omen 16 (Omen 16 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX 16 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Dragon Range refresh (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, 115 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Gefprce 577.03, Optimus and MUX
Memory
16 GB
, 1x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-5600
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 162 PPI, AUODBB2, IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, 1000 GB
, 860 GB free
Weight
2.397 kg, Power Supply: 770 g
Price
1500 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
外壳和连接性 - 时尚，但有所缩减
今年的机身经过了重新设计：屏幕比例从 16:9 改为 16:10，从而使底部边框更加纤薄。尺寸略有变化--宽度减小，深度增加，厚度不变。显示屏可打开约 135 度，铰链有轻微晃动。
带有镜面 OMEN 徽标的整体黑色设计语言基本保持不变。与 去年更加圆润的机型新版本重新采用了一些更锐利的线条和边缘。
惠普将铝制底座改为全塑料结构。这使得它的刚性稍差，键盘面板可能会轻微弯曲，但问题不大。不过，指纹很快就会出现在深色的表面上。
惠普还减少了端口：两个 Thunderbolt/USB 4 接口不见了。唯一的 USB-C 端口现在只支持 USB 3.2 Gen 2，而三个 USB-A 端口中的两个仍然是 Gen 1（5 Gbit/s）。也没有读卡器--类似于联想的 LOQ 15.
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø943 (903-985)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (438-961)
19.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
22 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
17 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
可持续性
惠普没有给出我们配置的精确数字。不过，15.6 英寸 Omen 16 的可持续发展报告指出，每台设备的二氧化碳排放量为 270-1,110 千克。惠普还声称在显示屏边框中使用了海洋塑料，在键帽中使用了可回收塑料，在铰链和底座等部件中使用了可回收金属。
虽然电源适配器仍用塑料包装，但包装大部分是纸板。
输入设备 - 全新布局，熟悉的感觉
键盘布局发生了变化：现在有了数字小键盘，但方向键变小了，而且只有一半高度。按键间距略有缩小，右侧的 Ctrl 键被 Copilot 键取代。
4 区 RGB 背光提供两个亮度级别。惠普标榜 26 键防鬼键滚动功能。键程很短，但由于反馈阻尼良好，感觉比实际键程更深。打字快速、舒适、安静。
触摸板（12.5 × 8 厘米）具有出色的滑动性和精确的点击反馈。
显示屏 - 一些不错的选择，但我们的不在其中
惠普为 Omen 16 系列列出了多种显示屏选项。我们的评测机使用的是最弱的面板之一：1200p IPS 显示屏（300 尼特、144 赫兹、62.5% sRGB）。其他版本包括 Ryzen 7 配置的 1080p 300 尼特 100% sRGB 变体，以及 Ryzen AI 或 Intel Core Ultra 型号的 1600p 500 尼特 240 Hz 100% sRGB 面板。
我们的测量确认了 300 尼特的亮度和扎实的均匀性，不过我们注意到右下角有一个小光斑。对比度尚可，但色彩覆盖率较低--低于 60% sRGB，即使是其他经济型笔记本电脑现在也能超过这一水平。
好的一面是，虽然响应时间较慢，但没有出现 PWM 闪烁，这在类似的经济型设备上也能看到，如 LOQ 15或 Alienware 16 Aurora.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUODBB2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 328 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 312.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16.1 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: 1262:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.73 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
calibrated: 4.22
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.05 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
38.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
58.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
40% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.63
CCT: 6718 K
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AUODBB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz | HP Omen 16 (2024) BOE BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 300 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Alienware 16 Aurora BOE NE16N41, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 75% | 125% | 80% | 73% | 78% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 40 | 68.6 72% | 99.9 150% | 71.7 79% | 67.3 68% | 70.8 77% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 58.1 | 98.6 70% | 100 72% | 99.9 72% | 99.2 71% | 99.9 72% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 38.7 | 70.6 82% | 98.3 154% | 73.6 90% | 69.1 79% | 72.1 86% |
| Response Times | 51% | 98% | 65% | -16% | -65% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 27.6 ? | 14.1 ? 49% | 0.42 ? 98% | 12.4 ? 55% | 33.9 ? -23% | 49.5 ? -79% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 19.4 ? | 9.3 ? 52% | 0.4 ? 98% | 5 ? 74% | 21.2 ? -9% | 29.3 ? -51% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1152 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 11 | |||||
| Screen | 15% | 54% | 15% | 30% | 10% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 328 | 292 -11% | 492 50% | 545 66% | 318 -3% | 345.3 5% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 313 | 291 -7% | 495 58% | 530 69% | 300 -4% | 324 4% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 85 -7% | 92 1% | 94 3% | 89 -2% | 88 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.26 | 0.24 8% | 0.54 -108% | 0.2 23% | 0.23 12% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1262 | 1217 -4% | 1009 -20% | 1590 26% | 1501 19% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.73 | 2.36 50% | 0.9 81% | 2.29 52% | 1.33 72% | 3.22 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.47 | 4.08 77% | 1.8 90% | 5.42 69% | 4.42 75% | 5.68 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.22 | 0.93 78% | 1.05 75% | 0.94 78% | 0.93 78% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.05 | 3 -46% | 1.2 41% | 3.5 -71% | 1.9 7% | 4.5 -120% |
| Gamma | 2.63 84% | 2.101 105% | 2.16 102% | 2.317 95% | 2.187 101% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 6718 97% | 5976 109% | 6291 103% | 6957 93% | 6678 97% | 7041 92% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 47% /
33% | 92% /
81% | 53% /
36% | 29% /
33% | 8% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱后的色彩校准并不理想，色域有限，几乎没有改进的余地。只有灰度精度在校准后有明显改善。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8215 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - 性价比极高的游戏
我们的测试机型配备 AMD 的 Ryzen 9 8940HX和 Nvidia 的 RTX 5060以及 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘。这使它成为一款中高端游戏笔记本电脑，能够以原始分辨率流畅运行大多数游戏。
测试条件
惠普没有将功能捆绑到一个应用程序中，而是预装了几个实用程序--支持助手、硬件诊断程序和 Omen Gaming Hub，在 Omen Gaming Hub 中可以调整性能模式（Eco、Balanced、Performance、Unleashed）和灯光设置。我们使用性能模式进行了所有基准测试。
不过，游戏中心充斥着大量广告和促销信息，包括刮刮卡和 "奖励"。它给人一种臃肿、迟钝的感觉，与其说是一个控制面板，还不如说是一个广告软件。
| 性能模式 | Cinebench R15 | CPU TDP | 3DMarkFire Strike 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 Ultra | 噪音 赛博朋克 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 释放 | 4,857 | 82 W | 31,331 | 84.6 fps | 52.7 dB |
| 性能 | 4,296 | 73，降至 61 W | 25,485 | 78.1 fps | 49 dB |
| 平衡 | 4,121 | 68，降至 56 W | 26,919 | 65.4 fps | 40.45 dB |
| 生态 | 4,204 | 78，降至 56 W | 13,800 | 60 fps | 29 dB |
| 电池 | 2,987 | 36 W | 18,609 | 47 fps | 31 dB |
处理器
......（英文 AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX(16 核、32 线程）在 Cinebench R15 循环测试中提供了强劲而稳定的性能，只有极少的节流现象。
在所有 CPU 基准测试中，它的表现都优于大多数竞争对手。它甚至超过了英特尔 i9-14900HX的持续性能，尽管初始突发性能大致相同。总体而言，它是一款性能卓越的 CPU。预计在电池电量不足的情况下，性能会降低约 40%。
Cinebench R15 多重测试
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX: Ø4084 (4037.14-4295.53)
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2939 (2630.37-4041.1)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2777 (2734.48-2831.06)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2683 (2542.1-2734.48)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250: Ø2469 (2446.48-2543.88)
Alienware 16 Aurora Intel Core 7 240H: Ø2461 (2417.65-2581.98)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (27145 - 32521, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (1917 - 1930, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (10439 - 12720, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=139, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=139, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (745 - 747, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (4296 - 5406, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=139, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=138, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (290 - 292, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (101 - 116, n=2) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (103455 - 133175, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (7360 - 7407, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (11447 - 16362, n=3) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (2767 - 2835, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3253, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (13357 - 19421, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (1925 - 1961, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (25.7 - 36.2, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (40.5 - 45.9, n=2) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (0.4215 - 0.4334, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=138, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (43311 - 52718, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (171374 - 212581, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (7988 - 9259, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (169334 - 172010, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (26855 - 29514, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (90684 - 113321, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (150768 - 168749, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (1784 - 2092, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (23193 - 28180, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (18283 - 34819, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
系统性能
日常性能感觉非常流畅。除了内存吞吐量受限于单通道内存（尽管延迟较低）外，其他基准测试成绩均符合目标值。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora -4! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) -3! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=108, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8054 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (29102 - 51173, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (35634 - 62219, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (32239 - 61929, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (83.5 - 83.9, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在浏览器使用过程中，延迟仍然较低，但在打开多个标签页时，延迟会激增--我们在 YouTube 测试中就掉了 16 帧。总体而言，与同类产品相比，延迟处于中等水平。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
1 TB PCIe 4.0 三星固态硬盘具有稳定的持续性能和强劲的 Q8-T1 连续读取速度，但 4K 性能较弱，整体上落后于竞争对手。
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7204 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5611 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
443 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
424 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
59.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
156.9 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
404 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
1013 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7228 (5964.95-7269.15)
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6983 (6099.15-7013.53)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6573 (6108.16-6593.26)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6303 (5373.37-6345.56)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5490 (1238.79-7073.06)
Alienware 16 Aurora ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3343 (2927-6898.79)
图形处理器性能
RTX 5060 在英伟达（NVIDIA）额定功率极限下运行。在合成测试中，Omen 16 的平均表现恰到好处，而在实际游戏中，它的表现则名列前茅，与 NVIDIA®（英伟达™）公司的游戏性能不相上下。 联想Legion 5 15.
在 1080p/1200p 下，Omen 16 可以在最大设置下轻松处理大多数现代游戏，不过只有在轻度游戏或启用 DLSS 后才能达到 144 Hz 的刷新率。
DLSS 质量模式有助于在《博德之门 3》中保持原生帧率，并在许多情况下实现 QHD 游戏。
预计电池使用时 GPU 性能将下降约 27% (Fire Strike)。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 30945 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 58934 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 28480 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 11484 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) -2! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 169.9, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=124, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=138, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 150.2, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| F1 25 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (46.3 - 117.9, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (46.3 - 50, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (132 - 291, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (146 - 165.5, n=4) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (152 - 308, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (152 - 190.4, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø78.2 (74.1-78.9)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø82.5 (77.1-83.6)
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø75.6 (72.4-76.9)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø80 (76.1-80.8)
Alienware 16 Aurora Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø72.9 (64.9-74.3)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 184.1 | 181.1 | 176.3 | 127.5 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 221 | 187.6 | 184.2 | 161.6 | ||||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 204 | 125.7 | 111 | |||||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 135.6 | 112.2 | 93.9 | |||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 492 | 303 | 238 | 217.8 | 155.7 | 83 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 155.8 | 125.2 | 110.4 | 109.1 | 114.3 | 75.5 | 63.8 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 121.1 | 109.2 | 95.3 | 86.6 | 65.2 | 56.1 | ||
| F1 25 (2025) | 189.8 | 174.9 | 154 | 25 |
排放与动力 - 在压力下保持冷静
噪音
在 "性能 "模式下，风扇通常在空闲时也会转动（约 27 分贝）。在平衡或环保模式下，风扇通常保持静音。在满载情况下，我们测得的分贝高达 52 分贝，不过游戏时通常保持在 49-50 分贝左右，整体表现一般至良好。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 27.64 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 49.5 / 52.73 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 | HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | Alienware 16 Aurora GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -10% | 1% | -4% | -40% | -1% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23 | 25 -9% | 25.5 -11% | 24 -4% | 25 -9% | 22.9 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23 | 29 -26% | 25.5 -11% | 25 -9% | 43 -87% | 24 -4% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23 | 30 -30% | 25.5 -11% | 27 -17% | 45 -96% | 25.6 -11% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 27.64 | 31 -12% | 26.9 3% | 29 -5% | 48 -74% | 25.6 7% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 49.5 | 46 7% | 34.6 30% | 48 3% | 53 -7% | 46.8 5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 49.5 | 50.1 -1% | 49 1% | 51 -3% | 49.9 -1% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 52.73 | 47 11% | 50.1 5% | 50 5% | 53 -1% | 55.6 -5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 47 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
令人惊讶的是，Omen 16 即使在压力下也能保持低温。即使在长时间负载的情况下，表面温度也很少超过 37°C，效果极佳。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -12% | -11% | -21% | -23% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 36 | 47 -31% | 42.2 -17% | 49 -36% | 49 -36% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 37 | 57 -54% | 51.7 -40% | 59 -59% | 58 -57% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 30 | 25 17% | 28.5 5% | 28 7% | 32 -7% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 32 | 26 19% | 29.2 9% | 31 3% | 29 9% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
立体声扬声器很弱，声音太小，缺乏低音，甚至中高音也不突出。耳机插孔位于左侧中部，非常方便。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
插入外接显示器会激活专用 GPU，从而增加空闲功耗。在负载情况下，功耗略高于平均水平。效率并不是它的强项，但 230 瓦的电源适配器大小适中。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.09 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 7.8 / 8.8 / 21.5 Watt |
| Load |
119 / 208 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1 | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ryzen AI 7 350, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | Alienware 16 Aurora GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Core 7 240H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 12% | -1% | -30% | 8% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 7.8 | 6.9 12% | 10.6 -36% | 20 -156% | 4.4 44% | 14.2 ? -82% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8.8 | 10.7 -22% | 12.1 -38% | 20.7 -135% | 18 -105% | 20.3 ? -131% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 21.5 | 11.3 47% | 15.9 26% | 22.7 -6% | 18.2 15% | 27.3 ? -27% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 119 | 69.7 41% | 95 20% | 71 40% | 87.1 27% | 111.9 ? 6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 192 | 162.6 15% | 169 12% | 153.1 20% | 123 36% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 164.5 | 165 -0% | 165 -0% | 151.1 8% | 120.6 27% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 208 | 233.6 -12% | 192 8% | 172 17% | 183 12% | 263 ? -26% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量 赛博朋克 / Stresstest
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø178 (161.44-212.89)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø17 (9.012-28.878)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø192.1 (168.36-201.72)
带外部监视器时的耗电量
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø94.9 (92.08-120.03)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103.5 (94.29-121.45)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.1 (82.09-122.09)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø161.3 (147.46-176.63)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø26.4 (17.347-34.44)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø164.5 (161.25-168.08)
电池寿命
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 Wh | HP Omen 16 (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Alienware 16 Aurora Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 96 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 18% | 70% | 98% | -5% | 50% | 31% | |
| H.264 (h) | 5.1 | 11.5 125% | 7.78 ? 53% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5 | 5.9 18% | 9.7 94% | 9.9 98% | 4.5 -10% | 7.5 50% | 6.57 ? 31% |
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.2 -8% | 1.3 0% | 1.414 ? 9% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 0.9 | ||||||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 6.9 | 9.79 ? |
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
- 10/07/2025 v8
Christian Hintze
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 82.5%  | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $19.99 BestParts New CPU+GPU Coolin... 2. $16.99 Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling ... 3. $35.99 Replacement Backlit Keyboard... List Price: 1500 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.7 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
2. 86.7% v7 (old)  | HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,258.00 HP Omen 16 2024 Gaming Lapto... 2. $1,335.46 HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ... 3. $1,198.88 HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ... List Price: 3200 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" 2560x1440 182 PPI IPS |
3. 87.2%  | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,349.00 Lenovo Legion 5 Gen 10 Gamin... 2. $1,496.99 Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10 RTX ... 3. $1,148.00 Lenovo Legion 5 15.1" OLED W... List Price: 1449€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED |
4. 84.7%  | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 1840 EUR | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI IPS |
5. 77.5%  | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,749.00 Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15... 2. $75.99 Ruilezyo 300W Laptop Charger... 3. $115.99 20V 12.25A 245W Slim Tip Cha... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
6. 76.2%  | Alienware 16 Aurora Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | List Price: 1100 USD | 2.6 kg | 15.2 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
