结论 - Yoga Pro 7i 15 是一款非常出色但价格昂贵的多媒体笔记本电脑
联想新推出的 Yoga Pro 7i 15 灵光版的整体配置非常不错,豹湖处理器和GeForce GPU 的性能数据良好,连接选项稳固,OLED 触摸屏绚丽多彩,具有 165 Hz 频率和准确的色彩配置文件,输入设备出色,音响系统也很不错。此外,该机还采用了铝制机身,配有两个固态硬盘插槽,但机身铰链会发出一些吱吱嘎嘎的声音,这与高昂的价格并不相符。
起售价在 2600 美元以上,这对于配备 RTX 5060 的笔记本电脑来说是很昂贵的,但不幸的是,在内存危机之后,我们现在似乎不得不习惯于这个价格。其他缺点还包括:当你对系统施加压力时,风扇会发出很大的噪音,因此 Yoga 的噪音甚至比一些游戏笔记本电脑还要大,而且联想还额外提供了Creator 电源模式,这在你已经拥有高性能模式的情况下根本没有意义,因为高性能模式现在已经非常没用了。
Pros
Cons
联想推出的 Yoga Pro 7i 15 G11 是一款全新的 15 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑,价格不菲,在目前的市场上相当独特,因为其他品牌目前通常只提供 14 英寸或 16 英寸机型。我们的评测配置为 酷睿至尊 9 386H32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 存储、 GeForce RTX 5060和 165 Hz 高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏,目前售价为 2619 美元。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接
联想为 Yoga Pro 7i 15 采用了铝制结构,整体质量非常好,但有两个弱点。Yoga Pro 7i 15 给人的感觉很结实,底座和盖子的稳定性都很好,但我们注意到铰链有轻微的吱吱声。不过,功能并没有受到影响,铰链调整得很好(最大开启角度 170 度),只有轻微的弹跳。另一个问题是电源键,按起来有点咔嗒咔嗒响。深灰色的机身并不太容易沾染指纹,但摄像头的凸起看起来不太好。内存和 Wi-Fi 模块都是焊接的,但可以安装两个固态硬盘(1 个 M.2-2242,1 个 M.2-2280)。
在连接性方面,Yoga 几乎提供了你想要的一切,包括 Thunderbolt 4、两个普通 USB-A 端口、一个快速 SD 卡读卡器(尽管不支持 SD-Express)和一个现代 Wi-Fi 7 模块,该模块可与相应的路由器一起实现极高的传输速率。此外,它还配备了 500 万像素网络摄像头(带 eShutter),显然是一款通过 Copilot+ 认证的笔记本电脑。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22.2 - 531, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (27.9 - 1455, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |

输入设备
显示屏 - 华丽的 165 Hz OLED 显示屏
Yoga Pro 7i 15 Aura Edition 只配备了频率为 165 Hz 的 2.8K OLED,但你可以选择非触控或触控版本。我们很高兴地告诉你,额外的触摸屏层并没有影响画质,因为即使是白色内容看起来也没有颗粒感(这通常是 OLED 触摸屏的问题)。整体图像质量非常出色,色彩丰富,黑色深邃,响应速度快。我们测量了 PWM 闪烁,但频率很高,为 1.3 kHz,因此不会出现任何问题。
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析,发现 SDR 的最大亮度接近 500 尼特,HDR 内容的亮度可达 1107 尼特(全屏 784 尼特)。联想提供了不同的色彩配置文件,其中 P3 配置文件的校准效果非常好,色彩偏差很小。您还可以获得用于 sRGB 内容的配置文件,因此图片编辑不成问题。我们无法通过自己的校准进一步提高色彩准确度。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 483 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
86.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
97.1% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
CCT: 6338 K
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 EF25QBA63.B, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3", 165 Hz | Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 Samsung ATNA60KA04-0, Tandem OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra ATNA60HR05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 ATNA60HU02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 300 Hz | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 160WV1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | -0% | 2% | -14% | 5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 97.1 | 98.8 2% | 97 0% | 99.2 2% | 71.7 -26% | 99.5 2% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 86.5 | 95.7 11% | 85.3 -1% | 90.2 4% | 73.6 -15% | 96.5 12% |
| Response Times | -67% | -88% | -155% | -3178% | -96% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.24 ? | 0.58 ? -142% | 0.5 ? -108% | 1.41 ? -488% | 12.4 ? -5067% | 0.65 ? -171% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.36 ? | 0.79 ? -119% | 0.4 ? -11% | 0.25 ? 31% | 5 ? -1289% | 0.87 ? -142% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1.31 ? | 1173.2 | 240 ? | 1440 ? | 240.2 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 41 | 16 61% | 100 -144% | 44 -7% | 31 24% | |
| Screen | -16% | 12% | -70% | -41% | -67% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 483 | 930.9 93% | 499 3% | 499 3% | 545 13% | 395.4 -18% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 484 | 947 96% | 505 4% | 502 4% | 530 10% | 392 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 99 | 94 -5% | 97 -2% | 98 -1% | 94 -5% | 95 -4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.02 | 0.54 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 3.51 -170% | 0.9 31% | 2.5 -92% | 2.29 -76% | 3.69 -184% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 6.48 -116% | 2.1 30% | 7.8 -160% | 5.42 -81% | 7.94 -165% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.6 6% | 1.6 6% | 4.7 -176% | 3.5 -106% | 1.9 -12% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.34 94% | 2.22 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.317 95% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6338 103% | 6398 102% | 6445 101% | 6715 97% | 6957 93% | 6274 104% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.55 | 1.05 | 0.68 | |||
| Contrast (:1) | 24950 | 1009 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -26% /
-24% | -25% /
-16% | -74% /
-73% | -1078% /
-604% | -53% /
-56% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.13 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1.31 Hz Amplitude: 41 % | ≤ 95 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1.31 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 95 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1.31 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7818 (minimum: 1.31 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
表演 - 黑豹湖与布莱克韦尔
测试条件
联想提供了自己的电源模式,可以与 Windows 设置同步。不过,除了我们熟悉的 "高性能"模式外,现在还增加了速度更快的 "创作者 " 模式。问题是这一举动并不合理,因为现在的高性能模式与自动 模式基本相同,如下表所示。而且还不能通过组合键 Fn+Q 选择该模式,这也很令人讨厌。创造者 模式也是获得完整 GPU 性能的唯一途径,我们在测试中使用了该模式。
| 能源概况 | CPU TDP | CB24 Multi | GPU TGP | Time Spy 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra | 最大风扇噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 电池保护器 | 40/15 W | 582 分 | 24 W | 2458 分 | 6.9 fps | 31.7 dB(A) |
| 自动 | 60/45 W | 1121 点 | 60 W | 9306 点 | 41.7 fps | 46 dB(A) |
| 高性能 | 70/55 W | 1187 分 | 60 W | 9363 分 | 43.3 fps | 49.5 dB(A) |
| 创作者 | 70/60 W | 1219 分 | 85 W | 11166 分 | 51.5 fps | 54.4 dB(A) |
| 电池 | 70/55 W | 1194 分 | 55 W | 8747 分 | 40.9 fps | 49.5 dB(A) |
处理器
新型 Core Ultra 9 386H在 Yoga Pro 7i 15 中的运行功耗最高可达 70 瓦,最低为 60 瓦,因此多核性能相当稳定。如果你需要更高的多核和单核性能,尽管该 CPU 无法赶上目前Apple 或高通公司的 ARM 芯片,但整体性能还是不错的。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (12144 - 21100, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 33362, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2010 - 2101, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2459, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (4757 - 8299, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 12912, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (767 - 796, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2197 - 3303, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (249 - 314, n=6) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (184.8 - 326, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (156 - 299, n=6) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (44980 - 72882, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5488 - 6493, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (13776 - 17405, n=8) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 29415, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 4335, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2778 - 2919, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (13098 - 17557, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 20422, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (1992 - 2162, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (805 - 2974, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (13.2 - 24.8, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 36.1, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (38.5 - 56.1, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (0.4055 - 0.4384, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 -1! | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 -1! | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 -1! | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H -1! | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (10001 - 21727, n=6) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2214 - 50388, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (53370 - 113595, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12867 - 201874, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2776 - 5604, n=6) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (653 - 8623, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13483 - 181505, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5314 - 7332, n=6) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (28414 - 61578, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6395 - 105740, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13243 - 126790, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (46362 - 72112, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (669 - 1271, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.2 - 2022, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1014 - 26875, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5138 - 11627, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (54042 - 89891, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 88154, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (4051 - 4826, n=5) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1570 - 4742, n=15, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
系统性能非常出色,但高级 Optimus 支持在开启/关闭 dGPU 时会出现短暂的卡顿。我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) -3! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (9465 - 9484, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 10386, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (10759 - 10841, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 11664, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (15199 - 15447, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7323 - 18233, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (13928 - 13963, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 16240, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (2108 - 2164, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2728, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (1917 - 1973, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2489, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (2442 - 2500, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 3465, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (1682 - 1988, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2024, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 596, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (310 - 326, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (298 - 302, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 402, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (442 - 446, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9465 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75437 - 129946, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 132135, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (81021 - 118858, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (19699 - 174586, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75959 - 135096, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17733 - 134998, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 535, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (87.2 - 116.9, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (327 - 7067, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Yoga 默认配备了一个紧凑型 M.2-2242 固态硬盘,我们使用的是 SK hynix 的 1 TB 硬盘(可用容量为 853 GB)。PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的传输速率良好且稳定,但插槽实际上支持速度更快的 PCIe 5.0 硬盘。如果你想扩大存储容量,可以安装第二个 M.2-2280 SSD(PCIe 4.0)。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
我们的 Yoga Pro 7i 配备了我们熟悉的 GeForce RTX 5060配备 8GB VRAM,最大 TGP 为 85 瓦。性能达到了预期水平,与英特尔最快的 Arc B390 iGPU 在 戴尔 XPS 16等产品相比,性能明显提高。这意味着它也是一个很好的游戏解决方案,尽管 VRAM 当你玩要求非常高的游戏时,VRAM 可能会导致一些问题。.如果你想安全起见,新的 Yoga Pro 7i 15 还可配备更新的 RTX 5070,它现在拥有 12 GB VRAM。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 32286 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 26610 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 11719 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2399 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 11026 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12 - 105, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (20 - 28, n=16) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20 - 186, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (38 - 186, n=17) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (134.5 - 1042, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (133 - 511, n=16) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Multimedia (105 - 401, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.41 - 112.3, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 144.4, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 303, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29 - 179.9, n=70, last 2 years) | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 133.8 | 105.4 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 183.5 | 167.4 | 161.7 | 152.9 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 217 | 155.3 | 113.3 | 82.6 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 138.1 | 110.4 | 93 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 494 | 296 | 237 | 199 | 142.7 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 150.5 | 120.4 | 105.5 | 103 | 70.1 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 129.3 | 107.1 | 90.5 | 82.2 | 61.4 | 51.5 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 257 | 203 | 68.2 | 68.3 | 43.6 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 60 | 56 | 48 | 34 | 28 | |
| F1 25 (2025) | 207 | 180.2 | 144.2 | 23.9 | 25.3 | 12.6 |
排放与功耗
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 25.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 49.3 / 54.4 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 9% | 6% | 4% | -1% | 11% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.3 | 23 5% | 25.1 -3% | 24.5 -1% | 24 1% | 23.3 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.3 | 23.5 3% | 25.1 -3% | 24.5 -1% | 25 -3% | 23.4 4% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.3 | 24 1% | 25.1 -3% | 24.5 -1% | 27 -11% | 23.4 4% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.5 | 24 6% | 25.1 2% | 27.1 -6% | 29 -14% | 25.8 -1% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 49.3 | 32.3 34% | 36.9 25% | 34.6 30% | 48 3% | 38 23% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 54.4 | 50.1 8% | 48.5 11% | 53 3% | 49 10% | 38.1 30% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 54.4 | 50.1 8% | 48.5 11% | 53 3% | 50 8% | 48.6 11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.5 °C / 88.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-2.8 °C / -5 F).
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -4% | -3% | -9% | -21% | 7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40.6 | 37.8 7% | 42.7 -5% | 44.9 -11% | 49 -21% | 40.6 -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 42.5 | 38.2 10% | 49.1 -16% | 50.5 -19% | 59 -39% | 39.8 6% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 26.3 | 30.4 -16% | 25.4 3% | 27.3 -4% | 28 -6% | 23.2 12% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 26.8 | 31 -16% | 25.5 5% | 27.5 -3% | 31 -16% | 23.8 11% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
音响系统非常出色,与较大的 Yoga Pro 9i.
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3" | Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, Tandem OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Lenovo UMIS AM541 1TB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3" | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, , OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -204% | 6% | -31% | -69% | 22% | -91% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.2 | 15.1 -190% | 4.4 15% | 5.7 -10% | 10.6 -104% | 4 23% | 9.32 ? -79% | 5.67 ? -9% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6.6 | 30.4 -361% | 6.4 3% | 8.7 -32% | 12.1 -83% | 4.4 33% | 13.9 ? -111% | 9.99 ? -51% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 6.8 | 46.2 -579% | 7.1 -4% | 9.1 -34% | 15.9 -134% | 10.2 -50% | 19.6 ? -188% | 12.4 ? -82% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 75.8 | 79.5 -5% | 55.1 27% | 88.7 -17% | 95 -25% | 44.2 42% | 94.9 ? -25% | 64.7 ? 15% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 131.1 | 161.2 -23% | 134.3 -2% | 160.3 -22% | 169 -29% | 62.6 52% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 138.8 | 231.4 -67% | 143.9 -4% | 234.9 -69% | 192 -38% | 94.6 32% | 211 ? -52% | 112 ? 19% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 160.7 | 133 | 156.9 | 165 | 62.4 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
84 瓦时的电池提供了良好的续航时间,在 150 尼特的 Wi-Fi 测试中为 12 小时,在最大亮度下为近 8 小时。这意味着 Yoga 超越了大多数竞争对手,只有三星 三星Galaxy Book6 Ultra更胜一筹,在 150 尼特条件下可持续近 17 小时(但在全亮条件下仅多 30 分钟)。
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 84 Wh | Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 92.5 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 80.2 Wh | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 84 Wh | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | |||||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 12 | 9.9 -17% | 16.8 40% | 9.2 -23% | 9.9 -17% | 10.3 -14% | 12 ? 0% |
笔记本检查评级
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11
- 06/04/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11 Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $49.91 Original New for Lenovo Yoga... 2. $889.00 Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 Laptop ... 3. $1,049.00 Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 Laptop ... List Price: 3100€ | 1.7 kg | 16.7 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 3100 USD | 1.9 kg | 17.3 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI Tandem OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 3599€ | 1.9 kg | 15.4 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2500€ | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $120.00 Laptop Keyboard for Schenker... List Price: 1840 EUR | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI IPS | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $2,999.00 Dell Premium 16 (Previously ... 2. $2,099.99 Dell XPS 16 9640 Laptop | In... 3. $1,319.99 Dell Premium 16 (Previously ... List Price: 2350 USD | 1.7 kg | 14.62 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.



































































