结论 -Legion 5 15 是一款非常出色的主流游戏机
联想Legion 5 15 是一款非常不错的主流游戏机,在我们的评测中没有发现任何重大问题。机箱功能齐全,有足够的端口、非常舒适的键盘以及很好的维护选项。内存升级非常容易,还有两个固态硬盘插槽。虽然机箱照明不足,但这并不一定是缺点。
Legion 在性能方面也没有让人失望。虽然 AMD 处理器不再是最新的,但与新的GeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑(115 瓦 TGP)配合使用,游戏性能仍然非常出色。如果你主要在 1080p 分辨率下玩游戏,RTX 5060 笔记本电脑的速度其实往往并不比 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑慢多少。全新的 OLED 面板提供了出色的图像质量,在 HDR 模式下非常明亮。结合快速的响应时间和 165 Hz 的刷新率,游戏看起来简直令人惊叹。此外,它还具有 P3 和 sRGB 的精确色彩配置文件,因此非常适合图片编辑。
我们在新的Legion 5 15 上没有发现太多问题。当然,我们评测配置中的 Zen 4 处理器并非最新型号,但游戏性能仍然不错。如果你喜欢 Zen 5 芯片或英特尔 CPU,可以额外付费购买。扬声器还可以更好一些,在性能模式下风扇的声音会相当大,尽管竞争对手的声音往往还要大一些。联想还没有加入高级 Optimus GPU 切换功能。
总之,联想提供了一个非常令人信服的整体方案,配备了令人惊叹的 OLED 面板和最快版本的新GeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑。如果您喜欢以原生 QHD 分辨率玩游戏,可选的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑就很有意义。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
我们的Legion 5 15 AMD 评测机可从联想购买,售价 1535 美元,配备 Windows 11 Home 操作系统。您也可以从亚马逊购买搭载英特尔处理器的Legion 5 15 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑,售价 1599 美元。
联想的Legion 5 15 Gen 10 是一款新的主流游戏机,主打性能。除了一系列功能外,还可选配亮度为 1000 尼特的 OLED 屏幕。我们的评测机是学生专用版,售价 1449 欧元,配备 AMD Ryzen 7 260(Zen 4)、32 GB 内存、高分辨率 OLED 以及新的 GeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑.
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 功能性游戏玩家
Legion 5 15 的黑色机身只使用了黑色表面,没有提供照明元素。联想在机盖上使用了铝制材料,而底座则由塑料制成,底部面板也相当粗糙。因此,从外观上看,Legion 相当内敛,但大面积的摄像头凸起看起来并不十分美观。表面也很容易留下指纹。
总的来说,底座的稳定性非常好,只有键盘中心区域很容易被推倒。不过,我们无法扭动它或发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音。铰链调整得非常好,能将盖子牢牢固定在位置上(最大开启角度为 165 度)。摄像头凸起相对较薄,但仍然非常稳定。
Legion 5 15 G10 的 OLED 版相对小巧,也是我们对比组中最轻的机型,仅重 1.94 千克。如果您购买的是 IPS 机型,重量会增加近 200 克,厚度也会增加 2.5 毫米。附带的电源适配器重量为 734 克。
连接性 - USB 4.0 和 Wi-Fi 7
Legion 的端口分布在两侧以及后部,这种布局在实际使用中非常方便。您可以获得一个现代的 USB-C 4.0 端口,它是通过 iGPU 连接的,因此当您使用外接显示器时,dGPU 不必总是处于激活状态。我们的评测机不是 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑,但它仍然支持网络摄像头的工作室特效以及实时字幕。500 万像素网络摄像头(包括 eShutter)可拍摄出相当清晰的图像,但色彩准确度不是很高。
除了千兆以太网端口外,还配备了联发科技的现代 Wi-Fi 7 模块(包括蓝牙 5.4)。在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的标准化 Wi-Fi 测试中,传输速率非常好且稳定。在评测期间,我们也没有遇到任何信号质量问题。
Networking | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

维护
可持续性
Legion 拥有多项环保证书(例如能源之星 9.0),但联想没有提供任何有关二氧化碳排放量或使用可回收材料的信息。包装可以完全回收。
输入设备 - 24 区照明
显示屏 - OLED,165 赫兹
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 492 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
98.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Sharp SHP153F (LQ156M1JW30), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 360 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AU Optronics B156HAN15.H, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 (BOE0C8E), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 240 Hz | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -21% | -21% | -19% | -17% | -48% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 67.3 -33% | 67.9 -32% | 70.5 -29% | 73.2 -27% | 43.6 -56% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.2 -1% | 98.9 -1% | 98.5 -1% | 100 0% | 65.1 -35% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.3 | 69.1 -30% | 68.8 -30% | 72.7 -26% | 74.6 -24% | 45.1 -54% |
Response Times | -6586% | -2548% | -6537% | -2193% | -5581% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.42 ? | 33.9 ? -7971% | 13 ? -2995% | 31.7 ? -7448% | 9.6 ? -2186% | 28.5 ? -6686% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.4 ? | 21.2 ? -5200% | 8.8 ? -2100% | 22.9 ? -5625% | 9.2 ? -2200% | 18.3 ? -4475% |
PWM Frequency | 1152 ? | |||||
PWM Amplitude * | 11 | |||||
Screen | -55% | -88% | -128% | -41% | -275% | |
Brightness middle | 492 | 318 -35% | 342 -30% | 315 -36% | 635 29% | 277 -44% |
Brightness | 495 | 300 -39% | 308 -38% | 303 -39% | 604 22% | 259 -48% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 89 -3% | 87 -5% | 90 -2% | 91 -1% | 77 -16% |
Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.64 | 0.19 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 1.33 -48% | 2.46 -173% | 2.26 -151% | 1.89 -110% | 4.3 -378% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.8 | 4.42 -146% | 4.12 -129% | 7.37 -309% | 3.14 -74% | 19.14 -963% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.9 -58% | 3.03 -153% | 4 -233% | 2.53 -111% | 3.6 -200% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.187 101% | 2.51 88% | 2.116 104% | 2.36 93% | 2.322 95% |
CCT | 6291 103% | 6678 97% | 7056 92% | 7570 86% | 6434 101% | 7182 91% |
Contrast | 1590 | 1179 | 1260 | 992 | 1458 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.94 | 0.82 | 1.03 | 1.14 | 3.01 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2221% /
-1233% | -886% /
-517% | -2228% /
-1264% | -750% /
-426% | -1968% /
-1178% |
* ... smaller is better
联想为Legion 提供了 X-Rite Color Assistant,也可以从联想网站下载。它将自动从联想服务器下载校准后的配置文件。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了分析,P3 和 sRGB 配置文件都非常准确。结合全色域,OLED 屏幕也非常适合图片编辑。该面板甚至相当全面地覆盖了 AdobeRGB 色域,色彩准确度总体上相当不错,只有 100% 红色没有达到 3 的目标值。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.22 ms rise | |
↘ 0.18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.21 ms rise | |
↘ 0.21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1152 Hz Amplitude: 11 % | ≤ 44 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1152 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 44 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1152 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8356 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - AMD Zen 4 与 Blackwell 的完美结合
联想为Legion 5 15 提供 AMD 和英特尔处理器。两个内存插槽最多可配备 64 GB 内存,您可以选择 GeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑或 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑(均为 115W TGP)。
审查设置
联想提供不同的电源配置文件,可通过组合键 Fn+Q 快速切换。状态指示灯的颜色显示激活的电源配置文件(蓝色:电池节能模式,白色:自动模式,红色:性能模式)。这对处理器性能的影响很小,但只有在性能模式下才能获得 GPU 的最大功率,因此我们在基准测试和测量中使用了该模式。如果使用电池供电,则只能使用自动模式。
TDP | CB24 Multi | TGP | Time Spy Graphics | Cyberpunk 2077 QHD | 最大风扇噪音 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
省电模式 | 60/50/45 瓦 | 903 分 | 60 瓦 | 9292 分 | 43.4 FPS | 40.4 dB(A) |
自动 | 85/78 瓦 | 985 分 | 75 瓦 | 10,567 分 | 49.1 FPS | 44.5 dB(A) |
性能 | 85/80 瓦 | 1,000 分 | 115 瓦 | 12,306 分 | 57.9 FPS | 50.1 dB(A) |
电池(自动) | 60/50/45 瓦 | 903 分 | 55 瓦 | 8,833 分 | 40.9 FPS | 44.5 dB(A) |
处理器 - AMD Ryzen 7 260
......(英文 AMD Ryzen 7 260(Hawk Pint)使用 8 个 Zen 4 内核,最高主频为 5.1 GHz,基本上是 Ryzen 7 8845HS 的换代产品。在Legion 的情况下,多核性能仍然不错,而且也保持稳定。不出所料,其性能几乎与 Ryzen 7 8845HS在 XMG Core 15 中的性能几乎完全与 Ryzen 7 8845HS 相当。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) -2! | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG -2! | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -2! |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (331 - 2298, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (786 - 1000, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138.2, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (104 - 106.5, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=147, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (15864 - 17712, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1760 - 1801, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=147, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (6161 - 6969, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (690 - 697, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=147, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (2564 - 2831, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (278 - 283, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (183 - 204, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=144, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=145, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (63076 - 72888, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (6439 - 6497, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=141, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (10180 - 13349, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=141, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (2622 - 2683, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=144, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (9848 - 12597, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1948 - 1986, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=145, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (17.6 - 22.4, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (49.6 - 54.5, n=2) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (0.4454 - 0.4465, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (25995 - 29330, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (106250 - 121427, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=144, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (4682 - 4980, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (115108 - 123832, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (14810 - 15328, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (56974 - 65308, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=144, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (68595 - 84965, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (1053 - 1131, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (13944 - 15751, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=144, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (23097 - 40796, n=2) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
系统性能
Legion 5 15 是一款快速的伴侣,也能轻松处理更复杂的任务。在评测期间,我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题,基准测试结果也没有显示任何性能瓶颈。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -2! | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG -4! |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=131, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=131, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=131, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=131, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=111, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=111, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=111, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (235 - 532, n=127, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=113, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=136, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8241 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (35899 - 69413, n=2) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (30894 - 60748, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (42757 - 87114, n=2) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 260 (91.5 - 92.1, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | |
Average of class Gaming | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV |
* ... smaller is better
Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
我们评测设备中的独立显卡是全新的 英伟达GeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑配备 8GB VRAM。联想使用常规的 Optimus 技术进行 GPU 切换,但您也可以根据需要在 BIOS 中完全停用 iGPU 或 dGPU。它是 5060 笔记本电脑中速度最快的版本,TGP 为 115 瓦(90 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost)。新款 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑仅比 115W 版本的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑在我们的合成基准测试中,新款 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑仅比 Razer Blade 14 中的 115W 版 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑慢 7%,而比最快的 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的优势为 9%。不过,大多数配备 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑或 RTX 4060 笔记本电脑的设备速度更慢。在持续负载下,GPU 性能完全稳定。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 35012 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 29189 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12037 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2671 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 12307 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 11971 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (21 - 21, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=139, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (38 - 38, n=2) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average of class Gaming (15 - 200, n=140, last 2 years) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (290 - 328, n=2) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=145, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
我们在 1080p 下的默认游戏测试再次显示,Legion 5 15 只是略微落后于刀锋 14 的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑,因此在全高清分辨率下游戏性能非常出色。迅驰 XMG 酷睿 15 再次接近,但其他对比设备都落在后面。在 QHD 分辨率下,与 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的差距拉大,但许多游戏仍能流畅运行。不过,要求非常高的游戏可能会出现 VRAM 警告和帧数下降。游戏性能完全稳定,即使长时间游戏也不成问题。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG -1! |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 166.5, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=123, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 212, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 166.2, n=148, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 166.5, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (88.6 - 90.8, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 120.5, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (55.4 - 57.9, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (101 - 110.7, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (44 - 175.5, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (71.8 - 76.7, n=3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (54.1 - 157.8, n=40, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (70.9 - 71, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (36.7 - 106.4, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (39 - 44.5, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
F1 25 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (21.8 - 59.8, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (21.8 - 24, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (9.33 - 36.8, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (9.33 - 13, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
Assassin's Creed Shadows | |
1920x1080 Ultra High | |
Average of class Gaming (33 - 75, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (33 - 36, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
2560x1440 Ultra High | |
Average of class Gaming (25 - 64, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (25 - 28, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 | |
1920x1080 Extreme Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (76 - 161, n=17, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
2560x1440 Extreme Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (60 - 127, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 120.1 | 106.4 | ||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 162 | 147.8 | 141.8 | 134.7 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 215 | 167.6 | 126 | 92.2 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 137.9 | 118.4 | 92.4 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 401 | 312 | 269 | 235 | 159.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 158.5 | 128.5 | 113 | 110.7 | 76.7 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 142.3 | 117.8 | 100.6 | 90.8 | 67.7 | 57.9 |
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 72.6 | 67.4 | 61.7 | 39.7 | ||
F1 24 (2024) | 243 | 231 | 214 | 70.9 | 70.4 | 44.5 |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 144 | 131 | 93 | 84 | 64 | |
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 61 | 58 | 49 | 36 | 28 | |
F1 25 (2025) | 184.4 | 177.1 | 165.5 | 21.8 | 18.3 | 9.33 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.5 / 25.5 / 26.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34.6 / 50.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 8945H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -40% | -7% | -3% | 3% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 25.5 | 25 2% | 23 10% | 25 2% | 23 10% | 25 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.5 | 43 -69% | 23 10% | 25 2% | 23 10% | 25 2% |
Idle Average * | 25.5 | 45 -76% | 23 10% | 27 -6% | 23 10% | 26 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.9 | 48 -78% | 27.87 -4% | 33 -23% | 23 14% | 27 -0% |
Load Average * | 34.6 | 53 -53% | 54.82 -58% | 40 -16% | 38.92 -12% | 40 -16% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 50.1 | 51 -2% | 54.82 -9% | 45 10% | 52.06 -4% | 52 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 50.1 | 53 -6% | 54.82 -9% | 46 8% | 52.09 -4% | 50 -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.96 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.7 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9 °C / -16.2 F).
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -10% | -21% | -11% | -25% | -10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.2 | 49 -16% | 50 -18% | 53 -26% | 52 -23% | 48 -14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 51.7 | 58 -12% | 66 -28% | 46 11% | 61 -18% | 46 11% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.5 | 32 -12% | 32 -12% | 32 -12% | 35 -23% | 34 -19% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.2 | 29 1% | 37 -27% | 34 -16% | 39 -34% | 34 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器的音量相当大,但声音不是很强,因此效果不是很好。我们建议在播放音乐/电影时使用外置扬声器,在玩游戏时使用耳机(同时考虑到风扇噪音)。
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.12 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 良好的电池运行时间
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1" | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3" | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -49% | -19% | -6% | -23% | -30% | -36% | -79% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.9 | 20 -190% | 5.2 25% | 7 -1% | 9.3 -35% | 13 -88% | 13.5 ? -96% | 14.1 ? -104% |
Idle Average * | 10.7 | 20.7 -93% | 19.6 -83% | 12 -12% | 12.9 -21% | 18 -68% | 15.7 ? -47% | 20 ? -87% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.3 | 22.7 -101% | 23 -104% | 18 -59% | 12.8 -13% | 23 -104% | 17 ? -50% | 27 ? -139% |
Load Average * | 69.7 | 71 -2% | 84 -21% | 70 -0% | 63 10% | 70.4 ? -1% | 106.9 ? -53% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 162.6 | 153.1 6% | 144 11% | 146.8 10% | 156.8 4% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 165 | 151.1 8% | 144 13% | 146.2 11% | 156 5% | |||
Load Maximum * | 233.6 | 172 26% | 165 29% | 206 12% | 286 -22% | 159 32% | 203 ? 13% | 256 ? -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 167 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption external screen
电池运行时间
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M24) R7 8845HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -25% | -27% | 21% | 51% | -59% | -15% | |
H.264 | 687 | 363 -47% | 608 -11% | 468 ? -32% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 579 | 270 -53% | 435 -25% | 702 21% | 889 54% | 237 -59% | 388 ? -33% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 56 | ||||||
Load | 72 | 75 4% | 65 -10% | 151 110% | 86.7 ? 20% |
笔记本检查评级
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10
- 06/30/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
可能的替代方案比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.