结论:Legion 5 提供了高端体验,却无需支付高端价格
对于游戏本而言,性能是最重要的方面。在这方面,联想Legion 5 15AGP11无疑表现出色。虽然其搭载的AMD Ryzen处理器和Nvidia GeForce显卡并非最顶级的型号,但得益于充裕的散热余量,它们依然能提供出色的游戏性能。
这款光面OLED屏幕对于一款以娱乐为主的笔记本电脑来说也是绝佳之选。联想在某些方面做了一些妥协,比如单区RGB键盘和机身下半部分采用塑料材质,但我们认为为了降低价格,这些妥协是合理的。最大的短板可能还是扬声器音质。 总体而言,对于售价在2,000欧元左右的游戏本来说,Legion是一个不错的选择。
Pros
Cons
规格:AMD Ryzen 和 Nvidia GeForce
机箱、连接设备和输入设备:外观更简洁的游戏玩家
Legion 5 系列是联想面向游戏玩家的中端产品线。在设计方面,这意味着这款 Legion 笔记本并未采用 Legion 7 上的一些 RGB 炫光效果,只有键盘会发出不同颜色的光——但整个键盘同时只能显示一种颜色。 机身主体主要由塑料制成,仅屏幕盖板采用铝合金材质。底盖采用粗糙质感的塑料,而掌托则带有光滑涂层。总体而言,做工质量不错,但显然无法与更高档的机型相提并论。 优点:屏幕可打开超过180度,支持单手开合。
如前所述,我们评测的这台设备配备了单区RGB背光键盘。它提供了良好的打字手感,方向键也较大。塑料触控板尺寸为12 x 7.5厘米。其运行流畅且无晃动,不过点击声可以再轻柔一些。
机身配备了丰富的传统接口,包括三个 USB-A 接口、用于游戏时提供稳定连接的 RJ45 接口以及 HDMI 接口。虽然没有 Thunderbolt 接口,但配备了 USB4。此外,联想保留了专用的充电接口,而非依赖 USB-C 充电。
拆解联想Legion笔记本电脑的内部结构相当简单:只需卸下共计十颗螺丝,并松开几个卡扣即可。这些螺丝不会留在机盖内,因此请小心不要弄丢!值得一提的是:机身内还预留了一个空闲的M.2 SSD插槽。此外,内存也支持升级。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Gaming (872 - 4473, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average Realtek 8922AE WiFi 7 PCI-E NIC (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Gaming (788 - 3208, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average Realtek 8922AE WiFi 7 PCI-E NIC (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |

显示屏:光面OLED屏幕
联想提供一种屏幕选项:一块15.3英寸、16:10比例的镜面OLED屏幕,分辨率为2,560 x 1,600(WQXGA/2.5K), 亮度500 cd/m²(SDR),100% DCI-P3色域覆盖,以及165 Hz刷新率。
这是一块出色的面板,亮度和色彩表现俱佳,响应速度也很快。不过,由于其全镜面设计会导致大量反光,因此并不适合在户外等光线强烈的环境中使用。此外,该面板确实采用了PWM调光技术来调节屏幕亮度。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
calibrated: 4.6
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
94.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
CCT: 6900 K
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 EF25QBA63.C, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3", 165 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 B153UAN02.J (AUO5DBA), IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 165 Hz | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 300 Hz | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 B160UAN08.3 (AUO2CB8), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 180 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -12% | -17% | -53% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 78.8 -21% | 71.7 -28% | 39.2 -61% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% | 58.2 -42% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 94.4 | 79.6 -16% | 73.6 -22% | 40.5 -57% |
| Response Times | -727% | -768% | -809% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.9 ? | 10.7 ? -1089% | 12.4 ? -1278% | 11.6 ? -1189% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.4 ? | 6.5 ? -364% | 5 ? -257% | 7.4 ? -429% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 656 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 18 | |||
| Screen | -2% | 17% | -53% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 500 | 291 -42% | 545 9% | 384 -23% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 500 | 277 -45% | 530 6% | 372 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 88 -10% | 94 -4% | 92 -6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.3 | 0.54 | 0.36 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 2.36 46% | 2.29 48% | 5.82 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.5 | 4.12 45% | 5.42 28% | 20.34 -171% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.6 | 1.05 77% | 3.95 14% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.5 -4% | 3.5 -46% | 5.4 -125% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.128 103% | 2.317 95% | 2.174 101% |
| CCT | 6900 94% | 7012 93% | 6957 93% | 6067 107% |
| Contrast (:1) | 970 | 1009 | 1067 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -247% /
-136% | -256% /
-122% | -305% /
-179% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 656 Hz Amplitude: 18 % Secondary Frequency: 1325 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 656 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 656 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7750 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能:基于AMD平台的强劲游戏笔记本电脑
测试条件
- 静音模式:PL1 45 W / PL2 55 W
- 平衡:PL1 65 W / PL2 95 W
- 性能:PL1 90 W / PL2 100 W
这三种功耗模式可通过Legion Space应用程序、按下FN + Q键或通过Windows电源设置进行设置。所有基准测试均在“性能”模式下进行。
处理器性能
该 AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 是AMD最新Gorgon Point系列的一款芯片,该系列是2025年Krakan Point处理器的更名版本。这款处理器拥有八个CPU核心,其中包括四个Zen5核心和四个Zen5c核心。如需查看与其他处理器的更多对比,请参阅我们的专题 CPU对比列表。
这款CPU的性能足以满足游戏需求,尽管在游戏类别中,平均性能比联想Legion 5 15AGP11快约16%。不过,与较早的锐龙CPU相比,这款能够持续保持高TDP运行的芯片表现依然出色。
在电池供电模式下,无法启用性能模式。在平衡模式下,CPU 性能下降了约 33%(Cinebench R23 多核测试得分为 13982 分)。
Cinebench R15 多循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (10488 - 40970, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (18316 - 18801, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (2038 - 2042, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1166 - 2387, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4029 - 16108, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (7161 - 7304, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (797 - 802, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average of class Gaming (442 - 904, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (1578 - 6271, n=104, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (2713 - 2778, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 344, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (209 - 215, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (175 - 182, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 330, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (33491 - 148086, n=104, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (64354 - 65714, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7436, n=104, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (6285 - 6338, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (6625 - 22104, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (13789 - 14624, n=3) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (2859 - 2973, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3259, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (6460 - 27010, n=104, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (12759 - 12776, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (2140 - 2191, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2474, n=104, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (11.5 - 44.3, n=104, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (23.3 - 23.4, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (51.3 - 57.1, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 88.8, n=104, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3439 - 0.759, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (0.4024 - 0.4056, n=2) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 -1! | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) -1! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 -2! | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (10227 - 85542, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (28231 - 28602, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (51376 - 238426, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (114866 - 114962, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2180 - 9817, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (4299 - 4319, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (14208 - 14234, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (25115 - 128721, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (57729 - 58470, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (89025 - 89510, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (1139 - 1172, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (5509 - 45446, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (15342 - 15486, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (45897 - 50947, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (12271 - 89891, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average of class Gaming (2930 - 11788, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (5459 - 5939, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统和存储设备
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) -3! | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 -4! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop -4! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5828 - 11730, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 11935, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6845 - 21327, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (7602 - 19954, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (1366 - 2409, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1386 - 2254, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1343 - 2729, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Gaming (1226 - 2334, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (220 - 532, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (165 - 354, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average of class Gaming (391 - 590, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9187 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (76371 - 91501, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 129946, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 118858, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (63485 - 66621, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (81394 - 118935, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 135096, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 259, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (100.1 - 102.9, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Average SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
磁盘限速:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
GPU 和游戏性能
联想搭载了 英伟达 GeForce RTX 5060,其功耗最高可达105瓦。总体而言,该显卡性能强劲,Legion笔记本电脑能够以高品质设置运行最新游戏,分辨率甚至可超过全高清——至少在屏幕原生2.5K分辨率下是如此。不过,凭借这款中端显卡,原生4K游戏体验仍难以企及。
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 33724 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25502 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12134 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (68.1 - 94.9, n=20) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
《赛博朋克2077》超高清帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 179.6 | 164.2 | 152.1 | 145.3 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 107.1 | 95.6 | 78 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 141.8 | 117.2 | 100.6 | 91.2 |
排放与能耗
系统噪声
在日常使用中,双风扇散热系统通常处于关闭状态,但有时也会运行,此时噪音水平为26.1 dB(a)——几乎听不见。 在高负载状态下,我们测得最大噪音为51.2 dB(a),这也是游戏过程中会出现的噪音水平。若希望降低噪音,可将笔记本电脑设置为“平衡模式”,不过这当然会带来性能的下降。
在测试过程中,未听到明显的线圈嗡鸣声。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.8 / 23.8 / 26.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40.1 / 51.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -12% | -6% | -7% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.8 | 25 -5% | 24 -1% | 25 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.8 | 29 -22% | 25 -5% | 25 -5% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.8 | 30 -26% | 27 -13% | 30 -26% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26.1 | 37 -42% | 29 -11% | 33 -26% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 40.1 | 43 -7% | 48 -20% | 38 5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 51.1 | 44 14% | 49 4% | 49 4% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 51.2 | 50 2% | 50 2% | 50 2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.7 °C / 99.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.9 °C / -16.1 F).
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -8% | -5% | -1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 49.6 | 53 -7% | 49 1% | 45 9% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 53.8 | 58 -8% | 59 -10% | 59 -10% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 28 | 29 | ||
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 31 | 36 |
* ... smaller is better
演讲嘉宾
立体声扬声器位于这款游戏笔记本电脑的底部。其音量处于中等水平,但低音不足,因此无论是玩游戏、看电影还是听音乐,最好还是使用外接音箱或耳机。
Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
功耗与电池续航时间
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3" | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3" | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3" | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | -18% | 29% | -18% | -58% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 7.7 | 3 61% | 10.6 -38% | 4.2 45% | 8.97 ? -16% | 13 ? -69% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 10.9 | 6.8 38% | 12.1 -11% | 6.8 38% | 12.9 ? -18% | 18.7 ? -72% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 11.3 | 11.5 -2% | 15.9 -41% | 9.8 13% | 18.3 ? -62% | 24.3 ? -115% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 85.9 | 67 22% | 95 -11% | 62 28% | 92 ? -7% | 110.2 ? -28% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 131.3 | 167 -27% | 169 -29% | 130.3 1% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 249.2 | 197 21% | 192 23% | 135 46% | 213 ? 15% | 258 ? -4% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 165 | 129.6 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9.5 | 7 -26% | 9.9 4% | 11.2 18% | 7.15 ? -25% |
Notebookcheck 评分
Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11
- 07/15/2026 v8
Benjamin Herzig
潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,479.00 Lenovo Legion 5 Gen 10 Gamin... 2. $1,996.00 Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 15.1... 3. $1,549.00 Lenovo Legion 5 16" WQXGA 24... List Price: 2000 Euro | 1.9 kg | 22.5 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1500 EUR | 2.2 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1840 EUR | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI IPS | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 AMD Ryzen 5 240 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $949.99 Acer Nitro V 16in Gaming Lap... 2. $1,019.00 Acer Nitro V 16 AI Gaming La... 3. $1,059.00 Acer Nitro V 16 AI Gaming La... List Price: 1100 EUR | 2.4 kg | 24.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.















































