判决
Erazer Deputy 15 P1 在测试中给人留下了积极的印象。而其他一些 RTX 5060 游戏笔记本电脑，如最近测试的 微星 Cyborg 15等其他一些 RTX 5060 游戏笔记本电脑的 TGP 较低，而 Blackwell 芯片却能在此提供稳定的性能，尽管与联想的竞争对手（如 LOQ 15和 Legion 5 15).已安装的酷睿 7 250H 也不是旗舰机型，但与低于 1500 欧元价格区间的竞争对手相比，它的表现仍然令人信服。相当坚固的机身、良好的输入设备和可供选择的端口进一步增强了它的吸引力。
不过，显示质量略显薄弱。尤其是 144 Hz IPS 面板只能提供有限的色域。一些竞争对手，如 XMG 酷睿 15 M25在这方面表现更好。此外，这款 15 英寸笔记本电脑在音质和噪音方面也存在一些问题。总的来说，Deputy 15 P1 无法获得 "最佳 RTX 5060 游戏笔记本电脑 "的称号。
Pros
+ 令人信服的系统性能
+ 各两个 M.2 和 SO-DIMM 插槽
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 隐私快门
+ 快速无线局域网
Cons
- 在负载（电源模式）下声音较大
- 电池功率可以更大
- 声音适中
- 色彩空间小
- 网络摄像头不佳
价格和供应情况
经过测试的 Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 配备了酷睿 7 250H 和GeForce RTX 5060，在各大在线零售商（如CoolBlue）的售价略低于 1300 欧元（约合 1531 美元）。
译者注：Medion 笔记本电脑未在北美正式销售。
规格
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (Erazer Deputy Series)
Processor
Intel Core 7 250H, 6 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core, 8 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 110 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2212 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 115 W TDP, GDDR7, ForceWare 591.86, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB DDR5-5600, two SO-DIMM slots (in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T, 1024 GB
, NVMe-SSD, two M.2 2280 slots (one empty)
Weight
2.242 kg, Power Supply: 612 g
Price
1300 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
与 XMG 一样，Medion 也分别采用了同方和 Clevo 的裸机和底盘。Erazer Deputy 15 P1 以后者为基础，重约 2.2 千克，在 1.9-2.4 千克的竞争机型中大致处于中间位置。盖子由金属制成，而相当坚固的底座则是塑料材质。虽然最大开启角度只有 130°，但在制造质量方面没有什么可批评的。
设备
除了不支持 USB 4/Thunderbolt 和读卡器外，其他连接功能都非常稳定。15 英寸机型有三个 USB-A 端口、一个 Type-C 端口、一个音频插孔、一个 RJ45 端口和一个 Kensington 锁插槽。外部显示器可通过 HDMI 或 Mini DisplayPort 直接连接。英特尔无线模块（AX211）性能良好，但网络摄像头的图像清晰度较差。拧松 13 颗十字螺丝后，就可以取下底板。如下图所示，Deputy 15 P1 提供了两个内存插槽和两个固态硬盘插槽，值得称赞。
交流
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1275 (1001-1408)
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6 MT7920 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (945-1016)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (788-855)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1820 (1746-1921)
Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø937 (766-1032)
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1363 (1248-1469)
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1669 (1508-1706)
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6 MT7920 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø961 (942-971)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (908-952)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1698 (1622-1727)
Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1745 (1723-1765)
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1554 (875-1694)
网络摄像头
2.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
维护
输入设备
按照橡胶圆顶的标准，键盘给人的印象相对较好。按键键程比较合适，不过我们认为反馈还可以稍微硬一些。我们特别喜欢键盘的布局，其他制造商可以借鉴。方向键大小适中，几乎整个笔记本的宽度都得到了利用。触摸板的尺寸约为 12.1 × 7.3 厘米，通常具有良好的精度和可接受的滑动性能。不过，与许多笔记本电脑一样，触摸板发出的 "嗒嗒 "声有些刺耳。
显示屏
平庸的图像质量让 Deputy 15 P1 损失了几个评分点。与一些完全覆盖 sRGB 的竞争对手不同，Medion 型号仅达到约 58% 的 sRGB，相当一般。制造商还可以提高亮度。虽然平均 314 cd/m² 的亮度足以应付大多数室内环境，但最迟在室外使用时，还是需要更高的亮度。不过，全高清面板在其他方面的表现还不错。IPS 面板的黑度相对较低，仅为 0.2 cd/m²，对比度超过 1,600:1。响应时间也可以接受。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMN N156HRA-EA1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 340 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 314.3 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 332 cd/m²
Contrast: 1660:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.57 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
calibrated: 3.95
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
40.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
58.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
38.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.023
CCT: 6838 K
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 BOEhydis NE156FHM-NXA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 165 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 300 Hz | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H NE160QDM-NYJ (BOE0C80), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 72% | 124% | 80% | 76% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 38.8 | 40.3 4% | 67.3 73% | 99.9 157% | 71.7 85% | 69.4 79% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 58.4 | 60.3 3% | 99.2 70% | 100 71% | 99.9 71% | 99.5 70% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 40.1 | 41.6 4% | 69.1 72% | 98.3 145% | 73.6 84% | 71.6 79% |
| Response Times | -20% | -13% | 99% | 66% | 58% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 29.3 ? | 39 ? -33% | 33.9 ? -16% | 0.42 ? 99% | 12.4 ? 58% | 14.3 ? 51% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 19.4 ? | 20.8 ? -7% | 21.2 ? -9% | 0.4 ? 98% | 5 ? 74% | 7 ? 64% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1152 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 11 | |||||
| Screen | -5% | 29% | 59% | 15% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 332 | 382 15% | 318 -4% | 492 48% | 545 64% | 432 30% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 314 | 347 11% | 300 -4% | 495 58% | 530 69% | 425 35% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 82 | 86 5% | 89 9% | 92 12% | 94 15% | 91 11% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.2 | 0.31 -55% | 0.2 -0% | 0.54 -170% | 0.37 -85% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1660 | 1232 -26% | 1590 -4% | 1009 -39% | 1168 -30% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.57 | 4.34 5% | 1.33 71% | 0.9 80% | 2.29 50% | 4.76 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.82 | 19.19 -50% | 4.42 66% | 1.8 86% | 5.42 58% | 8.59 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.95 | 3.56 10% | 0.94 76% | 1.05 73% | 1.18 70% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 2.4 41% | 1.9 54% | 1.2 71% | 3.5 15% | 6.2 -51% |
| Gamma | 2.023 109% | 2.165 102% | 2.187 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.317 95% | 2.079 106% |
| CCT | 6838 95% | 7024 93% | 6678 97% | 6291 103% | 6957 93% | 6690 97% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
-5% | 29% /
32% | 94% /
84% | 54% /
36% | 45% /
25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 29.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8013 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
Deputy 15 P1 不仅在价格方面让人感到舒适，在中低端产品的性能方面也是如此。在我们的测试配置中，2×8 GB DDR5-5600 内存和 1 TB SSD 在 2026 年依然可圈可点。
测试条件
Erazer 控制中心提供三种操作模式，我们的测试使用的是游戏模式。不过，在日常使用中，我们更倾向于娱乐模式，因为只有 CPU 性能略有下降，而设备在负载情况下仍然非常安静（见表）。
| 模式 | 游戏 | 娱乐 | 静音 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 噪音 | 55 dB(A) | 47 dB(A) | 34 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》帧速率（FHD/超高清） | 83.3 fps | 83.1 fps | 34.1 fps |
| GPU 功耗 | ~80 W | ~80 W | ~55 W |
| CPU PL1 | 110 W | 38 W | 15 W |
| CPU PL2 | 115 W | 115 W | 30 W |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 3049 分数 | 2650 分数 | 749 分数 |
处理器
英特尔 酷睿 7 250H首次出现在副手 15 P1 中。这款来自 Raptor Lake 处理器的 10 纳米处理器已不再完全跟得上时代的步伐，但凭借其 6 个性能核心和 8 个效率核心，它仍能提供稳定的性能。在冷启动后，酷睿 7 250H 最初领先于竞争对手的设备，但性能在一段时间后稳定在了 Ryzen 7 260或 Ryzen AI 7 350.
Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Intel Core 7 250H: Ø2774 (2639.92-3146.88)
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 Intel Core i5-13420H: Ø1674 (1645.82-1778.57)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250: Ø2469 (2446.48-2543.88)
Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2683 (2542.1-2734.48)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2777 (2734.48-2831.06)
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2234 (2213.12-2280.89)
CPU Performance rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (10131 - 85542, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (51019 - 238426, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2180 - 9817, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (23609 - 128721, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (5477 - 45446, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
系统性能
在系统性能方面，Deputy 15 P1 也在对比设备中名列前茅。在大多数情况下，系统的响应速度都非常快。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) -3! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 -2! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 10060, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 12600, n=116, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 16716, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8844 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 108104, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 259, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 250H (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在延迟方面，15 英寸机型处于中等水平，表现既不特别好，也不特别差。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
存储
存储设备的稳定性能值得称赞。在我们的循环测试中，许多其他竞争对手的固态硬盘有时会出现严重的节流现象，这说明散热效果不够理想。
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
5830 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5409 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
547.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
736.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2999 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
4171 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
62.89 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
198.5 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5801 (4932.28-5826.01)
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2776 (1715.89-4807.09)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5490 (1238.79-7073.06)
Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6303 (5373.37-6345.56)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6573 (6108.16-6593.26)
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2849 (1568.05-4752.57)
图形处理器性能
虽然 GeForce RTX 5060的额定功率高达 115 瓦，但即使在游戏模式下，我们也只能从 Blackwell 芯片中消耗约 80 瓦。因此，它在 3DMark 测试中的 GPU 性能与目前测得的 RTX 5060 平均水平大致相当，并没有像某些竞争对手那样遥遥领先。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 33272 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 69740 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27295 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 11526 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
游戏基准测试显示了 RTX 5060 的典型性能。只要坚持使用 1,920 × 1,080 设置，大多数游戏即使在（非常）高的设置下也能流畅运行。如果帧率紧张，升频等功能会有所帮助。例如，使用 DLSS Balanced（变压器），我们提高了 黑色行动 7从 36 帧/秒提高到 55 帧/秒（使用全光线追踪的超预设）。在启用 4 倍帧生成的基础上，它甚至达到了 161 帧/秒，不过不同用户的主观体验可能会有所不同。
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 183.8 | 179.6 | 128.5 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 182 | 133.9 | 141.7 | 139.4 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 117.9 | 108.9 | 97.3 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 119.2 | 97.5 | 95.6 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 110.6 | 93.9 | 83.3 | |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 88.6 | 62 | 45.4 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 63.4 | 56.3 | 41.1 | |
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 48.9 | 39.3 | 24.8 | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 83.4 | 66.3 | 37.1 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 110.1 | 88.6 | 61.9 | |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 80.7 | 59.4 | 30.5 | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 (2025) | 130 | 96 | 36 |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme Preset + Raytracing | |
| Average of class Gaming (2 - 60, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (32 - 38, n=4) | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (53 - 151, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (95 - 103, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| ARC Raiders | |
| 1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Raytracing AA:TSR | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (55 - 70.2, n=4) | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 79.8, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:TSR | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (79.9 - 104.9, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (40.9 - 114.5, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (31.1 - 40.9, n=4) | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9.81 - 49.9, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (58.3 - 72.7, n=4) | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| Average of class Gaming (20.4 - 82.3, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Borderlands 4 | |
| 1920x1080 Badass Preset AA:FX | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.48 - 54, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (16.3 - 24.8, n=4) | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (16.1 - 76.6, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (28.7 - 39.3, n=4) | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Core 7 250H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø75.2 (72.3-76.4)
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop: Ø58.6 (55.6-59.5)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø80 (76.1-80.8)
Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø75.6 (72.4-76.9)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø82.5 (77.1-83.6)
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø76.2 (68.4-78.9)
排放量
噪音排放
在游戏模式下，Deputy 15 P1 的音量比竞争对手要大。在《赛博朋克 2077》中，我们测得的音量为 55 dB(A)，而其他机型为 49-54 dB(A)--这种令人讨厌的音量基本上需要一个耳机（娱乐模式下为 47 dB(A)）。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 27 / 29 / 32 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 50 / 56 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Core 7 250H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -23% | 8% | 12% | 5% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25 | 24 4% | 25 -0% | 24 4% | 25.5 -2% | 24 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 27 | 28 -4% | 43 -59% | 25 7% | 25.5 6% | 25 7% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 29 | 29 -0% | 45 -55% | 27 7% | 25.5 12% | 26 10% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 32 | 33 -3% | 48 -50% | 29 9% | 26.9 16% | 27 16% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 50 | 48 4% | 53 -6% | 48 4% | 34.6 31% | 54 -8% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 55 | 52 5% | 51 7% | 49 11% | 50.1 9% | 54 2% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 56 | 54 4% | 53 5% | 50 11% | 50.1 11% | 55 2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度在预期范围内。Deputy 15 P1 的顶部峰值为 43 °C，底部峰值为 52 °C，与联想Legion 5 15 不相上下。在空闲状态下，机箱保持舒适，平均温度为 28 °C。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Core 7 250H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 4% | -5% | -4% | 5% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43 | 46 -7% | 49 -14% | 49 -14% | 42.2 2% | 50 -16% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 52 | 49 6% | 58 -12% | 59 -13% | 51.7 1% | 49 6% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 31 | 28 10% | 32 -3% | 28 10% | 28.5 8% | 35 -13% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 32 | 30 6% | 29 9% | 31 3% | 29.2 9% | 34 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在负载情况下，组件的温度不会过高。在使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 进行的压力测试中，酷睿 7 250H 和GeForce RTX 5060 的温度略低于 80 °C。
发言人
除显示屏质量外，扬声器质量也是 Deputy 15 P1 最大的缺点之一。在我们的音频分析中，大多数游戏笔记本的表现都更好。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
有趣：虽然一些竞争对手的速度更快，但 Medion 笔记本在 3D 模式下往往耗电量最大。不过，在空闲状态下，情况看起来要好一些。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 1.1 Watt |
| Idle | 13.7 / 14.7 / 17.9 Watt |
| Load |
110 / 191 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Core 7 250H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 15% | -6% | 11% | 21% | 17% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 13.7 | 16.8 -23% | 20 -46% | 10.6 23% | 6.9 50% | 9 34% | 13.8 ? -1% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 14.7 | 17.6 -20% | 20.7 -41% | 12.1 18% | 10.7 27% | 11 25% | 19.6 ? -33% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 17.9 | 19.8 -11% | 22.7 -27% | 15.9 11% | 11.3 37% | 23 -28% | 25.4 ? -42% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 110 | 66 40% | 71 35% | 95 14% | 69.7 37% | 91 17% | 111 ? -1% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 177.2 | 105 41% | 151.1 15% | 165 7% | 165 7% | 130 27% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 177.9 | 106.5 40% | 153.1 14% | 169 5% | 162.6 9% | 132.5 26% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 191 | 119 38% | 172 10% | 192 -1% | 233.6 -22% | 155 19% | 258 ? -35% |
* ... smaller is better
能耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø170 (164.9-181.2)
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø14.7 (13.7-17.9)
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø177.9 (160.4-190.9)
带外部监控器的能耗
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø102.2 (76.6-151.8)
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø163.3 (118.9-170.3)
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø153.3 (148.2-178.8)
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20 (18.9-23.9)
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø177.2 (163.5-191.4)
电池寿命
与竞争对手相比，Deputy 15 P1 的电池容量最小。Medion 笔记本的电池容量从 60 到 99.8 瓦时不等，只有 53 瓦时，但在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试（亮度降至 150 cd/m²）中仍能使用 5 小时。
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Core 7 250H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 53 Wh | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 76 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 6% | -13% | 90% | 87% | 48% | 28% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5.2 | 5.5 6% | 4.5 -13% | 9.9 90% | 9.7 87% | 7.7 48% | 6.66 ? 28% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 6.9 | 8.99 ? | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.492 ? | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 11.5 | 7.93 ? | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 0.9 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
事实证明，Erazer Deputy 15 P1 是一款优秀的游戏笔记本电脑，但也存在一些不足之处（显示色域、扬声器质量等），使其难以与竞争对手相抗衡，其中一些竞争对手的价格低于 1,500 欧元（约合 1,765 美元）。
Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761
- 02/18/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 78.6%  | Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Intel Core 7 250H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | List Price: 1300 EUR | 2.2 kg | 29 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
2. 73.7%  | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1049 EUR | 2.1 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
3. 77.5%  | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Lenovo LOQ 15 AI Gaming Lapt... 2. Lenovo LOQ 15.6" FHD IPS AI-... 3. Lenovo LOQ RTX 5050 Gaming L... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
4. 84.7%  | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 1840 EUR | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI IPS |
5. 87.2%  | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Zahara CR2016 CMOS Battery f... 2. YFLAPFAN (1 Pair) New CPU GP... 3. GBOLE 15.6" Replacement for ... List Price: 1449€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED |
6. 80.1%  | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 2. Smatree Laptop Sleeve for 16... 3. Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1700 EUR | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
