Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Intel Ultra 9 386H

英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 386H 是 Panther Lake 系列的高端 16 核 SoC。该芯片还提供 18 MB 英特尔智能高速缓存和较小的 4 核 iGPU。该处理器支持 vPro 管理功能。

386H 集成了英特尔公司采用全新 18A 工艺制造的计算芯片。其中包括 4 个高达 4.9 GHz 的大型 Cougar Cove P 核、8 个 Darkmont E 核和另外 4 个小型 Darkmont LP（低功耗）E 核。此外，还安装了带有 50 TOPS INT 8 的新型 NPU 5 和 IPU 7.5 图像处理器。集成内存控制器支持高达 96 GB LPDDR5-8533 或 128 GB DDR5-7200。

图形处理器芯片包含一个较小的 iGPU，具有 4 个 Xe3 内核，支持光线追踪，由英特尔公司采用英特尔 3 处理器制造。

第三个芯片组集成了平台控制器，具有 20 个 PCIe 通道（其他两个芯片组为 12 个）、4 个 Thunderbolt 4、Wi-Fi 7 (R2) 和蓝牙 Core 6.0。

据英特尔公司称，TDP 规定为 15-25 瓦（基本），短期内可达 80 瓦。

CodenamePanther Lake
SeriesIntel Panther Lake

Series: Panther Lake Panther Lake

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H1.6 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X9 378H1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H « 1.6 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H1.6 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H1.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Arc G3 Extreme1.5 - 4.7 GHz14 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Arc G31.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3551.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H1.5 - 4.6 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3651.8 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3351.6 - 4.6 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3251.6 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3321.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3221.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1600 - 4900 MHz
Level 2 Cache12.5 MB
Level 3 Cache18 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
4 x 4.9 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core
4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)25 Watt
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt
Manufacturing Technology1.8 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFCBGA2540
GPUIntel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT8
Chip AI180 TOPS INT8
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/05/2026
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
42.9 pt (72%)
AMD E1-2100
2.26 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
41.7 -3%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
41.8 -3%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
41.9 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
42 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
42 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
42.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
42.6 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
42.7 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
42.9
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
42.9 0%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
43.3 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
43.6 2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
43.7 2%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
43.8 2%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44.4 3%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
44.6 4%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
44.9 5%
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
44.9 5%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
49.1 14%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
59.6 39%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2026 - Cinebench 2026 CPU Single Thread
min: 503     avg: 512     median: 514 (70%)     max: 519 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2026 - Cinebench 2026 CPU Multi
min: 4730     avg: 4928     median: 4903 (48%)     max: 5151 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 124.6     avg: 125.8     median: 126 (1%)     max: 126.8 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1172     avg: 1218     median: 1210 (23%)     max: 1271 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 20344     avg: 20645     median: 20750 (19%)     max: 20841 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2057     avg: 2082     median: 2087 (85%)     max: 2101 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
2043 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
2044 -2%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2055 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
2057 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
2066 -1%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -1%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
2074 0%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2082
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2110 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2138 3%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2154 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2180 5%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
2188 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2194 5%
Apple M4 10-Core
2202 6%
...
Apple M5 10-Core
2459 18%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 787     avg: 793     median: 795 (86%)     max: 796 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 7913     avg: 8125     median: 8162 (20%)     max: 8299 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3172     avg: 3251     median: 3277 (21%)     max: 3303 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
070140210280350420490560630700770840910980105011201190126013301400147015401610168017501820189019602030210021702240231023802450252025902660273028002870294030103080315032203290Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 249     avg: 292     median: 313 (87%)     max: 314 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 71479     avg: 71910     median: 71655 (41%)     max: 72596 MIPS
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6118     avg: 6326     median: 6367 (72%)     max: 6493 MIPS
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 24.5     avg: 24.7     median: 24.7 (43%)     max: 24.8 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 245     avg: 262.3     median: 260 (3%)     max: 282 Seconds
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 156     avg: 162.3     median: 160 (1%)     max: 171 Seconds
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4096     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4384 sec
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21431     avg: 22027     median: 21914 (54%)     max: 22735 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19964     avg: 20307     median: 20307 (51%)     max: 20650 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 31629     avg: 32013     median: 31895 (57%)     max: 32515 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 14935     avg: 15191     median: 15156 (64%)     max: 15483 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 Single-Core
min: 2845     avg: 2882     median: 2886 (67%)     max: 2913 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.6 - Geekbench 6.6 Multi-Core
min: 15407     avg: 16500     median: 16816 (57%)     max: 17405 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2109     avg: 2129     median: 2134 (72%)     max: 2145 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17017     avg: 17142     median: 17162 (31%)     max: 17246 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 442     avg: 447.3     median: 444 (1%)     max: 456 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
123379 Points (81%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 242     avg: 281.7     median: 301 (75%)     max: 302 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 307     avg: 319.3     median: 325 (55%)     max: 326 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2073     avg: 2122     median: 2108 (74%)     max: 2185 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 104.6     avg: 106.1     median: 105.6 (18%)     max: 108 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125130135140145150155Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 104.4     avg: 106.2     median: 104.8 (19%)     max: 109.5 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125130Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.54     avg: 9.1     median: 7.9 (5%)     max: 15 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.15     avg: 9.3     median: 7.2 (5%)     max: 15.4 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 29.9     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (23%)     max: 31.6 Points per Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Amazon Logo
  • $2,499.99
    ASUS Zenbook Duo Laptop (2026), Dual 14” OLED 3K 144Hz Touch Display, Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 386H, Intel Graphics, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, Sleeve and Stylus Included, WiFi 7, Windows 11, Moher Gray
  • $1,799.99
    ASUS Vivobook S16 Laptop (2026), 16” 16:10 WUXGA OLED Display, Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 386H Processor, Intel® Arc™ Graphics, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, WiFi 6, Windows 11 Home, Matte Gray, S3607AA-DS99
  • $5,899.99
    ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo Dual Touchscreen Detachable 16" 3K OLED ROG Nebula HDR 120Hz Copilot+ PC Gaming Notebook Intel Core Ultra 9 386H 32GB RAM 1TB SSD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Stellar Grey
  • $3,099.99
    msi Stealth 16 AI+ 16” 240Hz QHD+ OLED Gaming Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA Geforce RTX 5070Ti, 32GB DDR5, 1TB NVMe SSD, Wi-Fi 7, Win 11 Home: Charcoal Black B3WH-036US
  • $1,399.99
    Dell 16 Plus Touchscreen Laptop Computer, Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, Copilot+ PC with on-Device AI, 32GB LPDDR5X RAM, 1TB PCIe SSD, WiFi 7, Backlit Keyboard, Windows 11 Home

v1.35
log 29. 09:30:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 May 2026 05:27:35 +0200 +0.005s ... 0.005s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.006s ... 0.01s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#20 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.015s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 20433 +0.031s ... 0.046s

#23 got single benchmarks 20433 +0.018s ... 0.064s

#24 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#25 min, max, avg, median took s +1.519s ... 1.583s

#26 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.479s ... 2.062s

#27 return log +0s ... 2.062s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H processor

Razer Blade 16 评测：英特尔酷睿处理器带来更快的帧速率

Razer Blade 16 评测：英特尔酷睿处理器带来更快的帧速率

以前 AMD 独占的 Razer Blade 16 现在可以配置英特尔 CPU，而且差异非常明显--通常是更好。不过，你得准备为所有升级支付更多费用。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16", 2.1 kg
配备 RTX 5090 的双屏游戏敞篷车 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 评测

配备 RTX 5090 的双屏游戏敞篷车 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 评测

华硕新推出的 ROG Zephyrus Duo 将双屏可折叠概念提升到了一个新的高度，这是一款搭载英特尔 Panther Lake CPU 和GeForce RTX 5090 的双屏游戏笔记本电脑。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16", 2.8 kg
联想 Pro 9i 16 G11 灵光版评测：戴尔 XPS 16 的直接竞争对手

联想 Pro 9i 16 G11 灵光版评测：戴尔 XPS 16 的直接竞争对手

除去 "Yoga "这个名字，新的 Pro 9i 16 G11 瞄准了 XPS 16，集成了更多的端口、更亮的触摸屏和真正的 Nvidia 独立显卡。性能猎手和内容创作者应该考虑联想的这款最新多媒体机型。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16", 1.9 kg

MSI Stealth 16 AI+ B3WF: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 16 AI+ B3WF

Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » 联想 Pro 9 16IPH11

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.30", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11

Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG

Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG

MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026): Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026)

Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00"
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606

Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » Razer Blade 16：低性能静音模式下的游戏可能真的值得一玩

   » Razer Blade 16 采用英特尔而非 AMD 技术，电池续航时间延长数小时

   » 2026 Razer Blade 16 将 AMD 换成英特尔，效果显著

   » 最新的 Razer Blade 16 比以前亮了两倍，对 HDR 的支持显著增强

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.30", 1.7 kg
   » 联想 Yoga Pro 7i 15 G11 是首批配备全新 RTX 5070 12 GB 的多媒体笔记本电脑之一

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
   » 评测结论 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 - 独一无二，但价格昂贵

   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo 2026 与 2023 - 牺牲性能以提高多任务处理能力

Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 联想 Pro 9 16 Aura OLED 显示屏的亮度接近 1600 nits，是用钱能买到的最亮的显示屏之一。

   » 联想颗粒感强、分辨率低的产品页面让原本光滑的 Pro 9i 16 Aura 看起来很糟糕

   » 联想 Pro 9 16 G11 Aura 在平衡模式下运行更安静，但对图形的影响很小。

   » 在首次基准测试中，酷睿 Ultra 9 386H 的速度几乎没有超过酷睿 Ultra 9 285H

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Panther Lake

» Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X9 378H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Arc G3 Extreme
   14x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Arc G3
   14x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 355
   8x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 365
   8x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 335
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 325
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 332
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 322
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX
   12x 2.9 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-01-12)