Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Intel Ultra 9 386H

英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 386H 是 Panther Lake 系列的高端 16 核 SoC。该芯片还提供 18 MB 英特尔智能高速缓存和较小的 4 核 iGPU。该处理器支持 vPro 管理功能。

386H 集成了英特尔公司采用全新 18A 工艺制造的计算芯片。其中包括 4 个高达 4.9 GHz 的大型 Cougar Cove P 核、8 个 Darkmont E 核和另外 4 个小型 Darkmont LP（低功耗）E 核。此外，还安装了带有 50 TOPS INT 8 的新型 NPU 5 和 IPU 7.5 图像处理器。集成内存控制器支持高达 96 GB LPDDR5-8533 或 128 GB DDR5-7200。

图形处理器芯片包含一个较小的 iGPU，具有 4 个 Xe3 内核，支持光线追踪，由英特尔公司采用英特尔 3 处理器制造。

第三个芯片组集成了平台控制器，具有 20 个 PCIe 通道（其他两个芯片组为 12 个）、4 个 Thunderbolt 4、Wi-Fi 7 (R2) 和蓝牙 Core 6.0。

据英特尔公司称，TDP 规定为 15-25 瓦（基本），短期内可达 80 瓦。

CodenamePanther Lake
SeriesIntel Panther Lake

Series: Panther Lake Panther Lake

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H1.6 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X9 378H1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H « 1.6 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H1.6 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H1.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Arc G3 Extreme1.5 - 4.7 GHz14 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Arc G31.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3651.8 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3551.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H1.5 - 4.6 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3351.6 - 4.6 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3251.6 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3321.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3221.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1600 - 4900 MHz
Level 2 Cache12.5 MB
Level 3 Cache18 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 16
4 x 4.9 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core
4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)25 Watt
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt
Manufacturing Technology1.8 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFCBGA2540
GPUIntel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT8
Chip AI180 TOPS INT8
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/05/2026
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
42.4 pt (71%)
AMD E1-2100
2.26 -95%
...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
41.5 -2%
Intel Core 7 250H
41.6 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
41.7 -2%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
41.8 -1%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
41.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
42 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
42 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
42.2 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
42.4
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
42.6 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
42.7 1%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
42.9 1%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
43.2 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
43.6 3%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
43.8 3%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
43.8 3%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44.4 5%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
44.6 5%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
49.1 16%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
59.6 41%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2026 - Cinebench 2026 CPU Single Thread
min: 486     avg: 504     median: 503 (68%)     max: 519 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2026 - Cinebench 2026 CPU Multi
min: 3799     avg: 4745     median: 4903 (48%)     max: 5151 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 118.1     avg: 122.7     median: 122.1 (61%)     max: 126.8 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 873     avg: 1135     median: 1210 (23%)     max: 1271 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12144     avg: 19054     median: 20750 (19%)     max: 21186 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2010     avg: 2061     median: 2077 (84%)     max: 2101 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
2040 -1%
Intel Core 9 270H
2040 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
2043 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2043 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
2044 -1%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 -1%
Intel Core 7 350
2046 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2055 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
2057 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2061
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 0%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
2071 0%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
2074 1%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2110 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2138 4%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2150 4%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2154 5%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2172 5%
...
Apple M5 10-Core
2459 19%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 762     avg: 784     median: 787 (85%)     max: 796 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4757     avg: 7501     median: 8162 (20%)     max: 8405 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2197     avg: 3052     median: 3274 (21%)     max: 3347 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
070140210280350420490560630700770840910980105011201190126013301400147015401610168017501820189019602030210021702240231023802450252025902660273028002870294030103080315032203290Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 249     avg: 294.4     median: 304 (84%)     max: 314 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 44980     avg: 66252     median: 71655 (41%)     max: 72882 MIPS
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5488     avg: 6175     median: 6280 (71%)     max: 6493 MIPS
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.2     avg: 22.3     median: 24.5 (43%)     max: 25.1 fps
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 245     avg: 306.9     median: 263 (3%)     max: 503 Seconds
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 156     avg: 187.9     median: 162 (1%)     max: 299 Seconds
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4055     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4384 sec
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14585     avg: 20768     median: 21914 (54%)     max: 23739 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
79358 Points (64%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12586     avg: 17516     median: 18413 (47%)     max: 20650 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 20787     avg: 29192     median: 30950 (55%)     max: 32515 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8059     avg: 14026     median: 15156 (64%)     max: 16291 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 Single-Core
min: 2778     avg: 2866     median: 2873 (66%)     max: 2919 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 Multi-Core
min: 13776     avg: 16120     median: 16816 (57%)     max: 17405 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1992     avg: 2102     median: 2109 (71%)     max: 2162 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13098     avg: 16229     median: 17162 (31%)     max: 17557 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 442     avg: 450.3     median: 447 (1%)     max: 461 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 123379     avg: 125596     median: 125584 (82%)     max: 127826 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 242     avg: 289.4     median: 298 (74%)     max: 309 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 302     avg: 314.6     median: 310 (52%)     max: 326 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1975     avg: 2073     median: 2073 (73%)     max: 2185 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56.3     avg: 94.6     median: 103.3 (18%)     max: 108 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125130135140145150155Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 72.1     avg: 99.1     median: 104.5 (19%)     max: 109.5 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125130Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.26     avg: 7.5     median: 6.5 (4%)     max: 15 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.15     avg: 7.9     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 15.4 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 29.9     avg: 31.7     median: 31.5 (23%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Amazon Logo
  • $2,499.99
    ASUS Zenbook Duo Laptop (2026), Dual 14” OLED 3K 144Hz Touch Display, Intel Core Ultra 9 Processor 386H, Intel Graphics, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, Sleeve and Stylus Included, WiFi 7, Windows 11, Moher Gray
  • $3,499.99
    Razer Blade 16 (2026) Gaming Laptop — NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 16" QHD+ 240Hz/0.2 ms OLED 16:10 Display, 32GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB SSD, Wi-Fi 7, TB5, Windows 11
  • $3,049.99
    Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition Laptop, Intel Ultra 9-386H, 32 GB LPDDR5x RAM, 1 TB PCIe SSD, 16" (2880x1800) Multi-Touch, Nvidia G-Force RTX 5060, Backlit Keyboard, W11 Pro, Thunder Grey+Traix Mousepad
  • $3,099.99
    msi Stealth 16 AI+ 16” 240Hz QHD+ OLED Gaming Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA Geforce RTX 5070Ti, 32GB DDR5, 1TB NVMe SSD, Wi-Fi 7, Win 11 Home: Charcoal Black B3WH-036US
  • $1,799.99
    ASUS Vivobook S16 Laptop (2026), 16” 16:10 WUXGA OLED Display, Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 386H Processor, Intel® Arc™ Graphics, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, WiFi 6, Windows 11 Home, Matte Gray, S3607AA-DS99

v1.35
log 11. 06:32:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Jul 2026 05:29:03 +0200 +0.005s ... 0.005s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.006s ... 0.011s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#20 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.016s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 20433 +0.036s ... 0.052s

#23 got single benchmarks 20433 +0.028s ... 0.08s

#24 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#25 min, max, avg, median took s +2.071s ... 2.151s

#26 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.282s ... 2.433s

#27 return log +0s ... 2.433s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H processor

一款顶级多媒体笔记本电脑搭载了更亮的OLED屏幕——华硕ROG Zephyrus G14 2026评测

一款顶级多媒体笔记本电脑搭载了更亮的OLED屏幕——华硕ROG Zephyrus G14 2026评测

华硕在新款ROG Zephyrus G14上改用了英特尔处理器，并搭载了GeForce RTX 5070 Ti显卡，它依然是市面上性能最强的14英寸笔记本电脑之一。 此外，它还配备了一块升级版的120 Hz OLED屏幕，亮度现已超过1,000尼特。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 14", 1.6 kg
微星 Prestige 13 AI+ 笔记本电脑评测：旅途中的完美伴侣？

微星 Prestige 13 AI+ 笔记本电脑评测：旅途中的完美伴侣？

微星Prestige 13 AI+的目标用户是那些经常移动、重视小巧轻便笔记本电脑的移动用户。这款13英寸设备配备了全新的Panther Lake处理器，旨在赢得追求最大便携性的用户的青睐。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 13.3", 888 g
配备 1100 尼特 OLED 的 15 英寸优秀多媒体笔记本电脑 - 联想 Yoga Pro 7i 灵光版评测

配备 1100 尼特 OLED 的 15 英寸优秀多媒体笔记本电脑 - 联想 Yoga Pro 7i 灵光版评测

联想是少数拥有 15 英寸设备的制造商之一，新推出的 Yoga Pro 7i 15 Aura Edition 是一款令人印象深刻的多媒体笔记本电脑，起价 2679 美元，配备英特尔 Panther Lake CPU、GeForce RTX 5060 GPU、32 GB 内存和绚丽的 165 Hz OLED 触摸屏。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.3", 1.7 kg
微星 Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG 评测：拥有高达 128 GB 内存的迷你 PC

微星 Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG 评测：拥有高达 128 GB 内存的迷你 PC

最新的微星迷你 PC 在减小体积和重量的同时，并没有减少太多重要的功能。不过，也有一些妥协和限制值得一提。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 552 g
Razer Blade 16 评测：英特尔酷睿处理器带来更快的帧速率

Razer Blade 16 评测：英特尔酷睿处理器带来更快的帧速率

以前 AMD 独占的 Razer Blade 16 现在可以配置英特尔 CPU，而且差异非常明显--通常是更好。不过，你得准备为所有升级支付更多费用。
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16", 2.1 kg

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » 配备 RTX 5090 的双屏游戏敞篷车 - 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 评测

Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想 Pro 9i 16 G11 灵光版评测：戴尔 XPS 16 的直接竞争对手

Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11, RTX 5070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11, RTX 5070 - 评测与配置

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-I51: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-I51 - 评测与配置

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 Gen 11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16i Gen 11 - 评测与配置

MSI Stealth 16 AI+ B3WI: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 16 AI+ B3WI - 评测与配置

MSI Stealth 16 AI+ B3WH: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 16 AI+ B3WH - 评测与配置

Acer Predator Helios 16S AI PHN16S-I51-94NV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 16S AI PHN16S-I51-94NV - 评测与配置

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW - 评测与配置

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AW: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AW

MSI Stealth 16 AI+ B3WF: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » 微星 Stealth 16 AI+ B3WF

Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » 联想 Pro 9 16IPH11

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.30", 1.7 kg
  External Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11

Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » 微星 Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3MTG

Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 14 AI A14-I71M

MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG

MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026): Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3MTG (2026)

Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00"
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14 评测结论——性能强劲且高效的全能型笔记本

   » 搭载英特尔Panther Lake处理器的2026款华硕ROG Zepyhrus G14是一款更出色的全能型笔记本

   » 2026款ROG Zephyrus G14虽然有所改进，但价格便宜600美元的2025款依然是一个非常不错的选择

   » 得益于RTX 5070 Ti显卡，华硕ROG Zephyrus G14 2026依然是最强大的14英寸游戏笔记本电脑

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.30", 1.7 kg
   » 当Apple 的 MacBook Pro 突然成为廉价替代品时，联想 Yoga Pro 7i 15 等笔记本电脑就有了问题

   » 联想 Yoga Pro 7i 15 售价超过 2600 美元，这是新的现实吗？

MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 0.6 kg
   » 微星Cubi AI+ 3MG比以前快了60%以上，但它本可以做得更好

   » 微星 Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG 微型电脑支持 128 GB 超大可移动内存

   » 微星 Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG 与 Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG：几乎无处不在的改进

Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » Razer Blade 16：低性能静音模式下的游戏可能真的值得一玩

   » Razer Blade 16 采用英特尔而非 AMD 技术，电池续航时间延长数小时

   » 2026 Razer Blade 16 将 AMD 换成英特尔，效果显著

   » 最新的 Razer Blade 16 比以前亮了两倍，对 HDR 的支持显著增强

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15IPH11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.30", 1.7 kg
   » 联想 Yoga Pro 7i 15 G11 是首批配备全新 RTX 5070 12 GB 的多媒体笔记本电脑之一

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.8 kg
   » 评测结论 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 - 独一无二，但价格昂贵

   » 华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo 2026 与 2023 - 牺牲性能以提高多任务处理能力

Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 联想 Pro 9 16 Aura OLED 显示屏的亮度接近 1600 nits，是用钱能买到的最亮的显示屏之一。

   » 联想颗粒感强、分辨率低的产品页面让原本光滑的 Pro 9i 16 Aura 看起来很糟糕

   » 联想 Pro 9 16 G11 Aura 在平衡模式下运行更安静，但对图形的影响很小。

   » 在首次基准测试中，酷睿 Ultra 9 386H 的速度几乎没有超过酷睿 Ultra 9 285H

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Panther Lake

» Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X9 378H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Arc G3 Extreme
   14x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Arc G3
   14x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 365
   8x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 355
   8x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 335
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 325
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 332
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 322
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX
   12x 2.9 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-78-100
   12x 3.4 GHz - 4 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 465
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
   12x 2 GHz - 5.2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-01-12)