判决
Cyborg 17 一看就让人印象深刻。带有半透明元素的纹理顶盖看起来既吸引人又与众不同，而在低于 1500 欧元的价格范围内，金属顶盖是远远不能保证的。然而，性能却给人留下了好坏参半的印象。虽然该测试配置属于价格较低的 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑，但 55 瓦的低 TGP 经常导致 17 英寸系统落后于竞争对手，在某些情况下甚至落后于配备 RTX 5050 的笔记本电脑。
显示屏则进一步暴露了不足。全高清面板亮度不高，色彩覆盖范围有限。在连接性（没有读卡器）和电池容量（只有 55 瓦时）方面也有待改进。另一方面，除了非传统的键盘布局外，输入设备还算不错。虽然只有一个 M.2 插槽对于一款 17 英寸设备来说略显不足，但内存和存储空间的升级能力还是为其加分不少。
在低于 1500 欧元的 RTX 5000 市场中，与之竞争的机型包括 宏碁 Nitro V 16 AI和 Alienware 16 Aurora、惠普 惠普预兆 16和 技嘉游戏 A16.其中，RTX 5060 性能更强，价格更贵。 联想Legion 7 16在我们的对比图表中，它也是一个参考点。
Pros
+ 引人注目的设计
+ RGB 灯光
+ 隐私百叶窗
Cons
- CPU 和 GPU 无法充分发挥潜力
- 不寻常的键盘布局
- 电池续航能力差
- 显示效果一般
价格和供应情况
经过测试的微星 Cyborg 17 B13WFKG 配备了酷睿 i7-13620H 和GeForce RTX 5050 笔记本电脑 GPU，可从多家在线零售商（例如Galaxus）处购买，起价约为 1,200 欧元，但定价和供货情况可能因地区和配置而异。
- msi Cyborg 17 Gaming Laptop, Intel 7-240H, 16 GB DDR5 RAM, 1 TB PCIe SSD, 17.3" FHD (1920x1080) 144Hz Display, Nvidia G-Force RTX 5060, 4-Zone RGB Keyboard, W11 Home, Translucent Black
- MSI Cyborg 17 B2RWFKG-055CA 17.3" FHD 144Hz Gaming Laptop, Intel® Core™ 7-240H, RTX 5060, 16GB DDR5 Memory, 1TB NVMe SSD, Windows 11 Home
- msi Cyborg 17 B2RWFKG Gaming Laptop 2025 17.3” FHD 1920x1080 Display IPS 144 hz Intel Core 7 240H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 8GB GDDR7 16GB DDR5 1TB SSD Four-Zone RGB Backlit KB Wi-Fi 6E Windows 11 Pro
规格
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG
Processor
Intel Core i7-13620H, 6 x 4.9 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core, 4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core, 45 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1455 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 55 W TDP, GDDR7, ForceWare 591.86, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, DDR5-5600, two SO-DIMM slots (one empty)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G, 512 GB
, NVMe-SSD, one M.2 slot (in use)
Weight
2.58 kg, Power Supply: 480 g
Price
1200 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
正如开头提到的，这款机箱有几个优点。除了设计和选材之外，制造质量和稳定性也非常令人信服。180 度铰链也不是每天都能见到的。Cyborg 17 的重量约为 2.6 千克，与 Alienware 16 Aurora 重量相近，2.2 厘米的高度对于 17 英寸设备来说完全可以接受。
连接性
端口的选择并不特别丰富。三个 USB 端口感觉相当有限，尤其是微星省略了 USB 4 和 Thunderbolt 支持。好在可用的 USB-C 端口支持 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort。外接显示器也可以通过 HDMI 直接连接。此外，还有一个音频插孔、一个 RJ45 端口和一个 Kensington 锁。
集成的英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E 模块（AX211）在发射时性能稳定，在接收时性能非常出色。不过，网络摄像头在清晰度和色彩准确度方面表现不佳。打开机箱需要拧下 12 颗十字螺丝。与某些竞争对手不同，微星采用了单风扇散热解决方案。
交流
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø866 (776-903)
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø742 (689-849)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø943 (903-985)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1260 (630-1453)
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1363 (1248-1469)
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1682 (1653-1726)
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 MediaTek RZ616; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1724 (1535-1752)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (438-961)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1418 (1171-1591)
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1554 (875-1694)
网络摄像头
7.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
维护
输入设备
任何不熟悉微星键盘的人一开始都会对键盘的布局感到吃力。首先是数字键盘，尽管有足够的空间，但它只有三列宽，而不是四列。小巧的方向键和部分非标准的按键排列也不会让用户感到轻松。不过，打字手感还是不错的。强烈的 RGB 灯光是一个特别的亮点，可以通过几个步骤进行调节。
触摸板的尺寸约为 12 x 7.5 厘米，对于 17 英寸设备来说大小合适，并具有良好的滑动特性。不过，微星还可以提高稳定性，因为点击机构容易发出响声，尤其是左侧的结构更坚固。
显示屏
Cyborg 17 最大的缺点之一是显示效果一般。虽然黑度（略低于 0.3 cd/m²）和对比度（接近 1,000:1）几乎没有值得批评的地方，但 250 cd/m² 的平均亮度只适合室内使用。色彩覆盖率也落后于一些竞争对手。在大约 50% sRGB 的情况下，图像显得相当暗淡。可视角度和响应时间则符合典型的 IPS 性能。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 274 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 251.6 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 274 cd/m²
Contrast: 945:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.19 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
calibrated: 5.02
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
34.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
50.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
33.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.121
CCT: 6597 K
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 B160UAN08.3 (AUO2CB8), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 180 Hz | Alienware 16 Aurora BOE NE16N41, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AUODBB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Samsung ATNA60HS01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H NE160QDM-NYJ (BOE0C80), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 16% | 105% | 15% | 154% | 103% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 33.7 | 39.2 16% | 70.8 110% | 40 19% | 99.6 196% | 69.4 106% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 50.7 | 58.2 15% | 99.9 97% | 58.1 15% | 100 97% | 99.5 96% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 34.8 | 40.5 16% | 72.1 107% | 38.7 11% | 93.5 169% | 71.6 106% |
| Response Times | 50% | -106% | -25% | 96% | 46% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 21.9 ? | 11.6 ? 47% | 49.5 ? -126% | 27.6 ? -26% | 0.6 ? 97% | 14.3 ? 35% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 15.8 ? | 7.4 ? 53% | 29.3 ? -85% | 19.4 ? -23% | 0.8 ? 95% | 7 ? 56% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1317 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 23 | |||||
| Screen | -29% | 6% | 7% | 57% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 274 | 384 40% | 345.3 26% | 328 20% | 477.6 74% | 432 58% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 252 | 372 48% | 324 29% | 313 24% | 483 92% | 425 69% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 85 | 92 8% | 88 4% | 91 7% | 95 12% | 91 7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.29 | 0.36 -24% | 0.23 21% | 0.26 10% | 0.37 -28% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 945 | 1067 13% | 1501 59% | 1262 34% | 1168 24% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.19 | 5.82 -12% | 3.22 38% | 4.73 9% | 3.11 40% | 4.76 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.99 | 20.34 -2% | 5.68 72% | 17.47 13% | 5.99 70% | 8.59 57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.02 | 3.95 21% | 0.93 81% | 4.22 16% | 0.79 84% | 1.18 76% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 5.4 -350% | 4.5 -275% | 2.05 -71% | 0.9 25% | 6.2 -417% |
| Gamma | 2.121 104% | 2.174 101% | 2.1 105% | 2.63 84% | 2.18 101% | 2.079 106% |
| CCT | 6597 99% | 6067 107% | 7041 92% | 6718 97% | 6405 101% | 6690 97% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
-8% | 2% /
11% | -1% /
4% | 102% /
88% | 44% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 21.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8013 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
Cyborg 17 的性能属于中低端产品。该系统配备 16GB DDR5 内存，足以满足 2026 年的游戏需求。不过，512 GB 固态硬盘很快就会成为限制因素，因为许多现代游戏的大小都能轻松超过 100 GB。
测试条件
我们的所有测量都是在人工智能 "智能自动 "模式下进行的，就 CPU 性能而言，该模式与 "极致性能 "配置文件相当。从 "平衡 "模式开始，GPU 性能基本相同（见表）。
| 模式 | 智能自动 | 极致性能 | 平衡 | ECO静音 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 噪音 | 48 dB(A) | 49 dB(A) | 48 dB(A) | 35 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077 帧率（FHD/超高清） | 68.1 帧 | 69.1 帧 | 68 帧 | 30 帧 |
| GPU 功耗 | ~55 W | ~55 W | ~55 W | ~25 W |
| CPU PL1 | 45 W | 45 W | 35 W | 15 W |
| CPU PL2 | 45 W | 45 W | 35 W | 15 W |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 1798 分 | 1802 分 | 1582 分 | 765 分 |
处理器
酷睿 i7-13620H 酷睿 i7-13620H已不再是英特尔 Raptor Lake 处理器中特别新的处理器。它提供六个性能核心和四个效率核心，总共支持多达十六个线程。在 CPU 基准测试中，这款 10 纳米机型未能充分发挥其潜力，最终成绩比该 CPU 之前的平均水平低了约 16%。好的一面是，Cinebench 循环的结果基本保持一致。即便如此，竞争设备的处理器整体速度还是更快。
Cinebench R15 多核耐久性测试
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø1798 (1751.93-1813.15)
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 AMD Ryzen 5 240: Ø2062 (2047.5-2078.25)
Alienware 16 Aurora Intel Core 7 240H: Ø2461 (2417.65-2581.98)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX: Ø4084 (4037.14-4295.53)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX: Ø4503 (4426.25-4915.82)
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2234 (2213.12-2280.89)
CPU Performance rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (10779 - 13601, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 238426, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (54287 - 67187, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 9817, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (2327 - 2773, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (66885 - 78867, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (6737 - 8421, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 128721, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (27242 - 32787, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (48646 - 85895, n=7) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (688 - 835, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (5919 - 7364, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (19421 - 34544, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
系统性能
在整体系统性能方面，Cyborg 17 至少避免了垫底的命运，在我们的对比领域中仅次于宏碁 Nitro V 16。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora -4! | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 10060, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 12600, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 16716, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=124, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7664 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 108104, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (31629 - 53927, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (35115 - 61853, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (30611 - 54111, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13620H (75.9 - 108.2, n=7) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
延迟结果处于中等水平，既不是特别好，也不是特别差。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储
微星为该系统配备了西部数据的 NVMe 固态硬盘，该固态硬盘性能充足，但并不出众。
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6136 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
172.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
547.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
491.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2918 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
125.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
81.01 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
171.4 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
持续读取性能：DiskSpd 读取循环（队列深度 8）
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6212 (5443.39-6237.98)
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5912 (4947.56-6263.77)
Alienware 16 Aurora ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3343 (2927-6898.79)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7228 (5964.95-7269.15)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6850 (5741.37-6906.34)
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2849 (1568.05-4752.57)
图形处理器性能
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 26544 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 52784 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21242 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9228 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 178.4 | 160.3 | 103.5 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 136.3 | 118.7 | 115 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 79.8 | 68.2 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 96.2 | 81.1 | 78.1 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 92.4 | 79.9 | 68.1 | |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 77.6 | 64.9 | 46.1 | |
| Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 53.8 | 49.7 | 36.5 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 48.2 | 43.7 | 22.8 | |
| Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) | 52.6 | 48.6 | 47.1 | |
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 41.2 | 34.1 | 20.5 | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 71.5 | 58.3 | 31.1 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 102 | 79.9 | 55 | |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 69 | 50 | 25.1 |
Doom: The Dark Ages | The Outer Worlds 2 | Borderlands 4 | The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered | Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 | Monster Hunter Wilds
| The Outer Worlds 2 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (58.3 - 72.7, n=4) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average of class Gaming (20.4 - 82.3, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (31.1 - 40.9, n=4) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9.81 - 49.9, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Borderlands 4 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX | |
| Average of class Gaming (16.1 - 76.6, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (28.7 - 39.3, n=4) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| 1920x1080 Badass Preset AA:FX | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.48 - 54, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (16.3 - 24.8, n=4) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (13.2 - 111.8, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (43.7 - 54.9, n=3) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (10.7 - 61.9, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (22.8 - 29.2, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (37.8 - 165.7, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (64.9 - 86, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.2 - 130.3, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (46.1 - 61.1, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Monster Hunter Wilds | |
| 1920x1080 high, no upscaling | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (13.6 - 49.7, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
| Average of class Gaming (16.6 - 95.3, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (16.6 - 36.5, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø63.6 (60.8-64.5)
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop: Ø66.3 (63-67)
Alienware 16 Aurora Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø72.9 (64.9-74.3)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø78.2 (74.1-78.9)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø82 (77-83)
Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø76.2 (68.4-78.9)
排放量
噪音排放
尽管 Cyborg 17 的功率限制较低，但在负载情况下，其噪音水平与竞争对手相似。44 至 50 dB(A)，建议使用耳机。不过，在空闲运行时，风扇有时会完全关闭。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25 / 27 / 34 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 44 / 50 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Alienware 16 Aurora Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 3% | 4% | 3% | -2% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25 | 25 -0% | 22.9 8% | 23 8% | 23.9 4% | 24 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25 | 25 -0% | 24 4% | 23 8% | 24 4% | 25 -0% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 27 | 30 -11% | 25.6 5% | 23 15% | 26 4% | 26 4% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 34 | 33 3% | 25.6 25% | 27.64 19% | 29.4 14% | 27 21% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 44 | 38 14% | 46.8 -6% | 49.5 -13% | 35.4 20% | 54 -23% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 48 | 49 -2% | 49.9 -4% | 49.5 -3% | 54.6 -14% | 54 -13% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 50 | 50 -0% | 55.6 -11% | 52.73 -5% | 54.7 -9% | 55 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
虽然机箱顶部或底部的最高温度为 49 °C，但这并不能完全反映所提供的性能。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | 22% | 7% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 49 | 45 8% | 36 27% | 47 4% | 50 -2% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 49 | 59 -20% | 37 24% | 44 10% | 49 -0% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 37 | 29 22% | 30 19% | 35.6 4% | 35 5% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 39 | 36 8% | 32 18% | 35.2 10% | 34 13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，CPU 和 GPU 的温度都略高于 70 °C，属于中等水平。
发言人
2.0 扬声器系统除了低音效果有限外，音质还是比较稳定的，在这方面甚至超过了惠普 Omen 16。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
虽然闲置功耗可能更低，但 Cyborg 17 在负载情况下的能耗要低于竞争对手，约为 90 至 115 瓦。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.9 Watt |
| Idle | 7.9 / 12.7 / 18.1 Watt |
| Load |
90 / 115 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Alienware 16 Aurora Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 16% | -11% | -32% | -55% | -15% | -63% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 7.9 | 4.2 47% | 4.4 44% | 7.8 1% | 9.4 -19% | 9 -14% | 13.8 ? -75% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 12.7 | 6.8 46% | 18 -42% | 8.8 31% | 10.6 17% | 11 13% | 19.5 ? -54% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 18.1 | 9.8 46% | 18.2 -1% | 21.5 -19% | 36.4 -101% | 23 -27% | 25.5 ? -41% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 90 | 62 31% | 87.1 3% | 119 -32% | 107.7 -20% | 91 -1% | 110.6 ? -23% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 108.4 | 129.6 -20% | 120.6 -11% | 164.5 -52% | 187.5 -73% | 130 -20% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 109.7 | 130.3 -19% | 123 -12% | 192 -75% | 188 -71% | 132.5 -21% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 115 | 135 -17% | 183 -59% | 208 -81% | 247 -115% | 155 -35% | 257 ? -123% |
* ... smaller is better
能耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø112.6 (110.7-114.3)
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.7 (7.89-18.1)
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø109.7 (106.1-115.2)
使用外部监控器进行压力测试时的功耗
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø78.5 (78.2-79.8)
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø77.3 (76.4-77.9)
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø101 (94.6-115.2)
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.9 (18-24)
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø108.4 (105.6-113.5)
电池寿命
不理想的空闲耗电量和适中的电池容量导致了令人失望的运行时间。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中（亮度降至 150 cd/m²），Cyborg 17 只用了不到 4 个小时，是同类产品中续航时间最短的。这并不奇怪，因为同类产品的电池容量在 70 到 96 Wh 之间。
| MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 55.2 Wh | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 76 Wh | Alienware 16 Aurora Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 96 Wh | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 Wh | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 84 Wh | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 195% | 97% | 32% | 24% | 103% | 76% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 3.8 | 11.2 195% | 7.5 97% | 5 32% | 4.7 24% | 7.7 103% | 6.67 ? 76% |
| H.264 (h) | 5.1 | 7.93 ? | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.483 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
微星在 Cyborg 17 上削减了很多成本，因此即使从预算角度考虑，我们也只能有保留地推荐这款 17 英寸游戏笔记本电脑。
MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG
- 02/13/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 76.3%  | MSI Cyborg 17 B13WFKG Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. msi Cyborg 17 Gaming Laptop,... 2. MSI Cyborg 17 B2RWFKG-055CA ... 3. msi Cyborg 17 B2RWFKG Gaming... List Price: 1200 EUR | 2.6 kg | 22.2 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
2. 77.5%  | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 AMD Ryzen 5 240 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1100 EUR | 2.4 kg | 24.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
3. 76.2%  | Alienware 16 Aurora Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. Alienware 16 Aurora Laptop A... 2. Alienware 16 Aurora Gaming L... 3. Alienware 16 Area-51 Gaming ... List Price: 1100 USD | 2.6 kg | 15.2 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
4. 82.5%  | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling ... 2. LAOKOEN New Cooling Fan for ... 3. ZAHARA Laptop Complete Set o... List Price: 1500 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.7 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
5. 86.6%  | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1650 USD | 2 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
6. 80.1%  | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... 2. Smatree Laptop Sleeve for 16... 3. 180W/150W Laptop AC Power Ad... List Price: 1700 EUR | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
