Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon HD 8870M

AMD Radeon HD 8870M

AMD Radeon HD 8870M的是一个28nm工艺的DirectX 11显卡的GCN架构(图形核心下一页)的根据。该系统主要用于大型的笔记本电脑,该卡定位在2013年的一类。相类似的Radeon HD 7870M,8870M在一个稍微慢的核心时钟的成本提供更高的内存时钟速度。设计的Radeon 8800M系列佛得角的芯片,如发现有其根源,例如,在桌面上的Radeon HD 7770拥有640个1D着色器内核和40个纹理单元。的8870M,但是,核心时脉为725 MHz(或升压)高达775 MHz的HD 7770与1000 MHz的。其结果是,一般的HD 8870M性能预计是介于7750和7770桌面Radeon卡。新的8870M 7870M和成功应该执行类似的GeForce®(精视™)GTX 660M。 640着色器的磁芯可用于与OpenCL 1.2通用计算(作为10计算单位)。特色的8870M包括通过UVD3视频解码进行解码的MPEG-4 AVC/H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,和Flash直接从AMD GPU。多视图编解码器(MVC)和MPEG-4的第2部分(DIVX,XVID)的高清视频是目前兼容。 ATI的Radeon 8800M系列还支持集成GPU和独立显卡之间的自动显卡切换功能。被称为汽车耐力赛。该技术将取代AMD的动态切换显卡,类似于NVIDIA的Optimus。另外,8870M可以直接支持6个连接的显示器使用Eyefinity技术如果被禁用耐力赛。的8800M系列的其它特征包括ZeroCore为降低功耗,当显示器关闭和电源选通区域中未使用的芯片断电。 PowerTune允许的显卡的GPU自动超频和降频是在其TDP限制。例如,该芯片可以降频运行时的FurMark和OCCT,但会在某些游戏如“失落的星球”,“孤岛危机”,“生化危机5超频。集成的HD音频处理器能够通过HDMI和DisplayPort(例如,蓝光视频)传输高清音频(TrueHD或DTS Master音频)。此外,现在它可以同时并行多个设备的音频输出与新的离散数字多音频(DDMA)功能。消耗功率的8870M应该明显低于100W的TDP 7970M作为其桌面的变种(7750和7770)的范围有关ACP平均55-80瓦特之间。然而,8870M只适用于笔记本电脑和DTRS。

Radeon HD 8800M Series

Radeon HD 8870M 640 @ 0.73 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon HD 8850M 640 @ 0.58 - 0.73 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon HD 8830M 640 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 MHz
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed725 MHz
Memory Speed4500 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11.1, Shader 5.1, OpenGL 4.1
Transistor Count1.5 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesOpenCL 1.2
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement18.12.2012

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1 pt (3%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -93%
...
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
0.88 -11%
0.888 -10%
0.903 -9%
0.909 -8%
0.91 -8%
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book
0.945 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
0.959 -3%
AMD FirePro W5130M
0.961 -3%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
0.968 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8870M
0.988
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
0.991 0%
1.002 1%
1.006 2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
1.023 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
1.035 5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
1.035 5%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
1.057 7%
AMD FirePro M5100
1.06 7%
1.062 7%
...
21.1 2036%
max:
33.3 3270%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 6393     avg: 10115     median: 11331.5 (12%)     max: 11402 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13705     avg: 15272     median: 15738.5 (4%)     max: 15905 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1906     avg: 2081     median: 2091 (4%)     max: 2235 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2127     avg: 2203     median: 2168.5 (2%)     max: 2346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 42775     avg: 56394     median: 57618 (7%)     max: 67563 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2842     avg: 3202     median: 3292 (5%)     max: 3311 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2746     avg: 2941     median: 2986 (3%)     max: 2996 Points
171.8 -94%
...
2729 -7%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
2762 -6%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
2766 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
2801 -5%
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
2817 -4%
2821 -4%
2872 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
2911 -1%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
2930 0%
AMD Radeon HD 8870M
2941
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
2965 1%
AMD FirePro M5100
2967 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 845M
2973 1%
2985 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P500
3022 3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
3101 5%
AMD FirePro W5130M
3106 6%
3131 6%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
3180 8%
...
59943 1938%
max:
106023 3505%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 8968     avg: 11060     median: 11715 (3%)     max: 11840 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 9619     avg: 10052     median: 10181.5 (6%)     max: 10225 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
9135 -9%
9184 -9%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
9484 -6%
9666 -4%
9694 -4%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
9844 -2%
9902 -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
9909 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
9947 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8870M
10052
10067 0%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
10150 1%
10211 2%
10234 2%
AMD Radeon 540X
10287 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
10511 5%
10514 5%
AMD FirePro M5100
10561 5%
10701 6%
...
132443 1218%
max:
170928 1600%
0%
100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
18829 Points (21%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
17567 -7%
17784 -6%
18044 -4%
18136 -4%
18199 -3%
18199 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
18414 -2%
18466 -2%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
18522 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8870M
18829
18903 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
18965 1%
19079 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
19100 1%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
19187 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
19268 2%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
19383 3%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
19694 5%
19971 6%
...
61850 228%
max:
87172 363%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 14222     avg: 15227     median: 15675 (20%)     max: 15785 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 25.4     avg: 26     median: 25.9 (9%)     max: 26.7 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
19.4 fps (9%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 36.4     avg: 37     median: 37 (7%)     max: 37.6 fps
0.6 -98%
...
33.7 -9%
34.1 -8%
35 -5%
AMD FirePro W5130M
36 -3%
36.1 -2%
36.2 -2%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
36.4 -2%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
36.8 -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
36.8 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8870M
37
37.4 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
37.5 1%
37.81 2%
AMD FirePro M5100
39.1 6%
39.5 7%
39.75 7%
40.2 9%
40.9 11%
AMD Radeon 540X
41.3 12%
...
532 1338%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
12.1 fps (7%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
6.1 fps (3%)
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
23.4 fps (18%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
2.4 fps (3%)
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
12.8 fps (10%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
24.6 fps (26%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
23.6 fps (11%)
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
7.4 fps (4%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 7425     avg: 7769     median: 7769 (6%)     max: 8113 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 53.8     avg: 55.2     median: 54.7 (19%)     max: 57.6 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
371 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
629 Samples/s (1%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
25.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
27.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
31.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
46.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
202.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
150.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
136.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
96.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
78.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
60.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
46.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
med. 1366x768
69.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
37.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
med. 1366x768
63  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
58.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
53.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
70.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
51.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
194  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
85.2 92.5 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
68.5 75.1 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.9 26.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
83.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
110.8 123.3 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.8 80.4 84 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.2 55.3 58.4 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.2 25.5 26.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
53.6 58.8 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.6 39.2 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.4 26.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4 10.8 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
174.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
97.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
75.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
54.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
22.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
31.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
99.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
86.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
48.9 55.9 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.1 47.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.9 37.1 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.8 26.1 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
71.8 78.3 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.4 63.1 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
47.4 49.9 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1 20.1 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
85.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
81.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
79.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
243.7 266.4 ~ 255 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
186.2 191.7 ~ 189 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
166 169.8 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
131.2 134.7 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
72.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
48.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
65.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
183.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
138.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
116.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
92.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
50 60.6 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.5 45.5 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.8 31.8 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1 12.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
50.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
45.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
67.9 77.9 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.8 48.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.7 39.1 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.4 24.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
132.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
96.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
85.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
40.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
59.7 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
59.7 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.8 49.4 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
69.5 70.9 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.4 48.6 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4 23.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
97.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
67.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
47.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
74.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.2 70.8 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49.8 54.4 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.4 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
135.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
78.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
49.9 51.5 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40 41.4 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.2 40.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.8 19.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
97  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1366x768
94.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
145.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
55.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Civilization 5

Civilization 5

2010
low 1024x768
70.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
80.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
72.4  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
65.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1360x768
70.5  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
41.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
71.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
high 1024x768
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
high 1024x768
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
134  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
58  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
high 1280x1024
59.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag25.323.619.110.7
Need for Speed: Rivals27.326.925.619.9
Call of Duty: Ghosts31.124.619.411.6
Battlefield 446.739.135.315.1
Fifa 14202.4150.6136.5116.8
Total War: Rome II96.578.2
Saints Row IV4032.819.7
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified60.83015.7
Splinter Cell: Blacklist46.431.615
Dota 269.253.4
Company of Heroes 237.433.623.14
GRID 26358.426.7
Metro: Last Light53.447.430.1
BioShock Infinite70.355.751.419.3
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm194897226
SimCity83.347.837.520.3
Tomb Raider117785224
Crysis 356362410
Dead Space 3174.497.375.246.2
Far Cry 354.848.426.811
Assassin´s Creed III22.421.213.4
Hitman: Absolution31.127.422.713
Call of Duty: Black Ops 299.586.953.936.4
Need for Speed: Most Wanted52453525
Medal of Honor: Warfighter75594919
Dishonored85.581.179.151.8
Fifa 13255189168133
Borderlands 272.361.148.431.5
Guild Wars 265.428.516.4
Counter-Strike: GO183.2138.4116.387.2
Darksiders II92.154.3
Sleeping Dogs55403012
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier50.825.1
Max Payne 345.331.228.525.1
Dirt Showdown73473725
Diablo III132.996.285.454.2
Risen 2: Dark Waters6055.740.620.5
Mass Effect 3606049
Alan Wake704823
Anno 207097.367.647.524.6
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim74.9665232
CoD: Modern Warfare 3135.795.778.151.2
Battlefield 351413919
Batman: Arkham City975330
Deus Ex Human Revolution94.540.1
Total War: Shogun 2145.855.6
Civilization 570.731.2
Mafia 280.472.465.143.1
Metro 203370.541.814.9
Resident Evil 571.564.5
Crysis - GPU Benchmark4219.21
Crysis - CPU Benchmark3917.36
World in Conflict - Benchmark134584832
World of Warcraft59.234.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
13
17
9
6
19
18
3
11
24
10
2
28
16
3
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 24. 16:59:35

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.055s ... 0.056s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.056s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.056s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3570 +0.028s ... 0.084s

#9 got single benchmarks 3570 +0.018s ... 0.102s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.102s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.535s ... 0.637s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.637s

#13 Got 229 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.657s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.657s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.04s ... 0.696s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +1.78s ... 2.477s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.482s

#18 return log +0s ... 2.482s

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter