Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 7 240H

Intel Core 7 240H

英特尔酷睿 7 240H 是 Raptor Lake-H 系列(基于 Alder Lake 架构)笔记本电脑的高端移动 CPU。它于 2024 年底发布,提供 6 个高性能内核(P-cores,Golden Cove 架构)和 8 个高效内核中的 4 个(E-cores,Gracemont 架构)。P 核心与 E 核心结合使用时,可支持 16 个线程的超线程技术。高性能集群的时钟频率范围为 2.5 至 5.2 GHz(单核提升),高效集群的时钟频率范围为 1.8 至 4 GHz。E 核心的性能应与旧版 Skylake 核心相似(与 酷睿 i7-6700HQ).所有内核均可使用多达 24 MB 三级缓存。

与旧版 酷睿 i7-13620H酷睿 7 240H 提供了更高的时钟速度(尤其是 Turbo Boost),并支持 DDR5-5600。

性能

得益于时钟速度的提升,酷睿 7 240H 应该可以略胜老款 i7-13620H。不过,速度更快的第 13 代 i7 型号提供了更多的 E 核,因此多线程性能明显更好。

功能特点

集成内存控制器支持各种内存类型,最高可达 DDR5-5600(高于第 12 代的 DDR5-5200)。线程指令(硬件)可帮助操作系统决定在性能或高效内核上使用哪个线程,以获得最佳性能。针对人工智能任务,CPU 还集成了 GNA 3.0 和 DL Boost(通过 AVX2)。第 8 版的 Quick Sync 与 Rocket Lake CPU 相同,支持 MPEG-2、AVC、VC-1 解码、JPEG、VP8 解码、VP9、HEVC 和 AV1 硬件解码。CPU 现在支持用于 GPU 的 PCIe 5.0 x8 和用于 SSD 的两个 PCIe 4.0 x4。

集成图形适配器基于 Xe 架构,可提供 96 个 EU(执行单元)中的 64 个。频率高达 1.5GHz。

功耗

酷睿 7 240H 的额定 TDP 为 55W(PL1,115W PL2),采用改进的 10 纳米工艺(英特尔 7)制造,与第 12 代 CPU 相比,时钟速度更高。

CodenameRaptor Lake-H Refresh
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-H

Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H Refresh

Intel Core 9 270H2 - 5.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 7 250H1.8 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 7 240H « 1.8 - 5.2 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 5 220H2 - 4.9 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core 5 210H1.6 - 4.8 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1800 - 5200 MHz
Level 1 Cache864 KB
Level 2 Cache9.5 MB
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads10 / 16
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
4 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesThread Director
GPUIntel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1550 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date12/18/2024
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
39.4 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 108.9     avg: 111.2     median: 111.2 (62%)     max: 113.5 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 819     avg: 881     median: 881 (16%)     max: 943 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14686     avg: 15637     median: 15637 (15%)     max: 16588 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1831     avg: 1868     median: 1868 (79%)     max: 1905 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 703     avg: 717     median: 716.5 (78%)     max: 730 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5648     avg: 6017     median: 6017 (15%)     max: 6386 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2318     avg: 2450     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2582 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
0130260390520650780910104011701300143015601690182019502080221023402470Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 264     avg: 270     median: 270 (75%)     max: 276 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 57234     avg: 61146     median: 61146 (35%)     max: 65058 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5851     avg: 6012     median: 6011.5 (71%)     max: 6172 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.9     avg: 18     median: 18 (32%)     max: 19 fps
051015202530Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 339     avg: 361     median: 361 (5%)     max: 383 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 195     avg: 209     median: 209 (1%)     max: 223 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4329     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4805 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21914     avg: 24061     median: 24061 (59%)     max: 26208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27077     avg: 29611     median: 29611 (53%)     max: 32145 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11809     avg: 12893     median: 12893 (54%)     max: 13977 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2601     avg: 2632     median: 2646 (66%)     max: 2648 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 11285     avg: 12604     median: 12846 (50%)     max: 13681 points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1837     avg: 1850     median: 1849.5 (72%)     max: 1862 points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10558     avg: 11417     median: 11417 (20%)     max: 12276 points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494     avg: 519     median: 518.5 (1%)     max: 543 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 261     avg: 269.5     median: 269.5 (74%)     max: 278 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
295 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1792     avg: 1904     median: 1904 (71%)     max: 2016 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 99.7     avg: 131.2     median: 131.2 (23%)     max: 162.6 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 109     avg: 132.8     median: 132.8 (24%)     max: 156.5 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.01     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (3%)     max: 5.85 Watt
012345678910Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.83     avg: 5.6     median: 5.6 (6%)     max: 7.42 Watt
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 16.5     avg: 18.9     median: 18.9 (14%)     max: 21.3 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33
log 14. 17:46:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Sep 2025 16:14:44 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.01s ... 0.01s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.012s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18675 +0.015s ... 0.027s

#11 got single benchmarks 18675 +0.012s ... 0.039s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.453s ... 0.493s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.493s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.493s

Reviews for the Intel Core 7 240H processor

Alienware 16 Aurora 评测:经济实惠的 1080p 超高清游戏入门笔记本电脑

Alienware 16 Aurora 评测:经济实惠的 1080p 超高清游戏入门笔记本电脑

用户只需支付 1100 美元,就能获得 120 Hz IPS 显示屏、全 sRGB 色彩和可观的GeForce RTX 5060 GPU。不过,有一个具体的缺点可能会让一些主流或竞技游戏玩家望而却步。...
Intel Core 7 240H | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.6 kg
华硕 V16 V3607V 笔记本电脑评测: GeForce 无需破费的 RTX 显卡

华硕 V16 V3607V 笔记本电脑评测: GeForce 无需破费的 RTX 显卡

只要你知道哪些地方存在偷工减料的情况,华硕 V16 就能成为一个可靠的万用解决方案,在大多数家庭、办公室或教室场景下都能表现出色。...
Intel Core 7 240H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2 kg

Asus V16 V3607VM: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus V16 V3607VM

Asus V16 V3607VH: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus V16 V3607VH

Lenovo V15 G5 IRL: Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo V15 G5 IRL

Asus V16 V3607V: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus V16 V3607V

Alienware 16 Aurora: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » 与 16X Aurora 相比,Alienware 16 Aurora 有一个隐藏的缺点

   » Alienware 16 Aurora 实际上比价格更高的 16X Aurora 更时尚、更耐用

Asus V16 V3607V: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
   » 新款华硕 V16 售价低于 1000 美元,物有所值,但全塑料外壳令人望而却步

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Raptor Lake-H

» Intel Core 9 270H
   14x 2 GHz - 5.8 GHz
» Intel Core i9-13900HK
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i9-13905H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i9-13900H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13800H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core 7 250H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13705H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13700H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core 7 240H
   10x 1.8 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13620H
   10x 1.8 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core 5 220H
   12x 2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13600H
   12x 2.1 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13505H
   12x 1.9 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13500H
   12x 1.9 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core 5 210H
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13420H
   8x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
   14x 4.3 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core 7 240H
   10x 1.8 GHz - 5.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
- AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core i7-12800H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
   11x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
- Intel Core i7-12650HX
   14x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01- 6)