RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑和高达 128 GB 内存的游戏/工作站混合型笔记本电脑 - XMG Pro 16 (E25) 笔记本电脑评测

Name: SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Brand: SCHENKER

5070 Ti 笔记本电脑，2300 美元起。

新款 XMG Pro 16 采用了新的外壳和更快的组件，与 XMG Neo 16 的差距大大缩小。它的性能不错，但在功能方面，你不得不做出一些妥协。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 05/07/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Arrow Lake Blackwell RTX 5000 Gaming Geforce Intel Windows Thunderbolt

结论 - XMG Pro 16 E25 是一次重大升级

新款 XMG Pro 16 相比旧款有了显著升级，与 XMG Neo 16 的整体差距明显变小。新款 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑的性能令人印象深刻，该版本使用了 TGP 为 140 瓦的最快变体。与新款酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 配合使用，该笔记本电脑的游戏性能同样出色，不过我们也希望看到配备 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX 的机型。虽然在负载情况下散热噪音很大，但其温度明显低于旧型号，尽管其性能有所提高。

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

它的 IPS 显示屏做得不错，虽然其连接性包括 PCIe 5.0，但你不得不放弃 Thunderbolt 5、Advanced Optimus 和 Wi-Fi 7。新 Pro 16 的起售价约为 2,270 美元，性价比还是不错的。 Neo 16.

Pros

+ 高性能（游戏、CPU 和 GPU）

+ 良好的维护选项

+ 雾面 IPS 面板，300 赫兹

+ 大量端口，包括快速读卡器

+ 两个固态硬盘插槽（1 个 PCIe 5.0）

+ 更长的电池寿命

+ 与前代产品相比，机箱温度大大降低

Cons

- 既没有 Wi-Fi 7、高级 Optimus，也没有 Thunderbolt 5

- 扬声器较弱

- 负载时声音大

价格和供应情况

新型 XMG Pro 16 (E25) 可从Bestware 购买，起价约为 2,270 美元。

结论 - XMG Pro 16 E25 是一次重大升级
规格
外壳和连接
输入设备
显示屏 - IPS，300 赫兹
性能 - 最高 128 GB 内存
排放与能源
Notebookcheck 总评分
可能的替代品比较

XMG 的 Pro 16 是一款面向游戏玩家和工作站用户的快速 16 英寸笔记本电脑。2025 型号采用了全新的外壳以及GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑。买家可以选择两种处理器，即老款的酷睿 i9-13900HX 和新款的酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX。它采用哑光 WQHD IPS 面板（500 尼特、300 赫兹）。我们的测试设备配备了酷睿 Ultra 9 处理器、32 GB 内存和快速 1 TB 固态硬盘（PCIe 5.0），价格约为 2800 美元。

规格

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25)

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 150 W PL2 / Short Burst, 135 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop - 12 GB VRAM, Core: 1750 MHz, RAM: 2600 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 115 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 576.28

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-6400, Dual-Channel, 2 slots, max. 128 GB

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, NE160QDM-NZL, IPS, glossy: no, 300 Hz, Adaptive Sync

Mainboard

Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)

Storage

Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB

, 868 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Arrow Lake-S PCH - ACE (Audio Context Engine)

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Audio, Card Reader: SDXC

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 26.5 x 356.7 x 252.5

Battery

99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: 1080p w/ shutter + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 250W PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.517 kg, Power Supply: 618 g

Price

2480 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳和连接

XMG Pro 16 的外壳为烟灰色，看起来非常低调，而且没有任何照明元素。它的盖子由铝制成，而底座和显示屏框架则由塑料制成。从质量角度来看，我们对其稳定性和表面处理没有任何负面意见，但其表面积聚了大量污垢。铰链调节良好（最大开启角度接近 180 度），我们在测试过程中只注意到很小的摇晃。底盖由 12 颗十字螺丝固定，可以轻松取下。在内部，你可以看到风扇、电池、WLAN 模块、两个固态硬盘插槽和两个内存插槽。不过，有些部件（包括散热垫）位于额外的螺丝固定盖下，这就增加了拆卸的难度。

Pro 16 的用户将不得不放弃 Thunderbolt 5，但除此之外，其连接性还不错。它的端口分布对于日常使用非常实用，而且与目前许多竞争对手不同的是，它还在背面设有接口。它的全功能读卡器速度非常快，Wi-Fi 模块工作稳定，但还不支持 Wi-Fi 7 标准。该设备的 1080p 网络摄像头配有机械快门，拍照效果一般。它不是 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，但支持网络摄像头的 Studio Effects 和实时字幕。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) DIN A4 ❌

左：以太网（2.5 GBit/s）、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2（10 GBit/s、DisplayPort 1.4a、100 瓦功率传输）、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1（5 GBit/s）、3.5 毫米音频

右：2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/s)、SD 读卡器、Kensington Nano Saver Lock

背面带 Thunderbolt 4（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort 2.1、140 瓦功率传输）的 USB-C 4.0、电源、Mini DisplayPort 2.1、HDMI 2.1

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	142 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19 - 204, n=66, last 2 years)	92.3 MB/s -35%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	86 MB/s -39%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	260.6 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=65, last 2 years)	117.2 MB/s -55%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	89 MB/s -66%

Networking
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1644 (min: 1469) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1585 (min: 1529) MBit/s ∼95%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1143 (min: 930) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1672 (min: 1316) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1648 (min: 1560) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1577 (min: 1533) MBit/s ∼94%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	843 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	732 (min: 367) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1446 (min: 1163) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1210 (min: 566) MBit/s ∼77%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	636 (min: 485) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1040 (min: 739) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	820 (min: 711) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1205 (min: 1100) MBit/s ∼77%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1194 (min: 998) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1312 (min: 1065) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1402 (min: 997) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1564 (min: 1521) MBit/s ∼100%

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1644 (1469-1704)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1585 (1529-1625)

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25): 8.01 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 13.86 ∆E

可持续性

全球国际货运公司尚未提供任何有关该笔记本电脑_二氧化碳排放量或环保认证的信息。其包装几乎完全由纸/纸板组成。

输入设备

其键盘布局现在与 Neo 16包括偏移方向键，输入感觉非常舒适--尽管比不上它更昂贵的兄弟。不过，你甚至可以顺利地书写长篇文字。它具有独立的按键背光（四种强度级别），你可以在颜色上发挥创意。它的 ClickPad 虽然变小了一些（12.2 x 7.8 厘米），但仍然足够大。它发出的机械 "咔嗒 "声听起来相当响亮，但手感舒适顺滑。

显示屏 - IPS，300 赫兹

Pro 16 配备了 WQHD IPS 面板（2,560 x 1,600）。从主观上看，这款哑光面板的图像质量非常好，由于采用了 300 Hz 的刷新率，动作看起来非常流畅。其响应时间同样很快，而且我们没有发现 PWM 闪烁。

该显示器的亮度略高于 500 cd/m²，但其最大对比度因黑色水平的提高而受到一定影响，在这种情况下，OLED 或 MiniLED 面板的表现会更好。出厂时安装的 sRGB 配置文件对色彩的描绘非常准确，但有轻微偏蓝。我们通过自己的校准纠正了这一问题，但其色彩准确性随之下降。该面板完全覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间。


486 cd/m²	526 cd/m²	521 cd/m²
502 cd/m²	538 cd/m²	517 cd/m²
475 cd/m²	505 cd/m²	501 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

NE160QDM-NZL tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 538 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 507.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 538 cd/m²
Contrast: 1145:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
75.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) NE160QDM-NZL, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 NE160QDM-NZC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 NE161QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1", 165 Hz	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 BOE NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Samsung ATNA60HU01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Display		-5%	17%	-7%	-5%	19%
Display P3 Coverage	74.7	68.8 -8%	99.1 33%	67.4 -10%	69.3 -7%	99.5 33%
sRGB Coverage	99.8	99.5 0%	99.9 0%	97.2 -3%	99.4 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	75.4	70.8 -6%	89.1 18%	69.3 -8%	70.1 -7%	94.4 25%
Response Times		-19%	22%	-50%	-39%	95%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	10.5 ?(3.4, 7.1)	12.7 ?(6, 6.7) -21%	4.6 ?(2.1, 2.5) 56%	12 ?(5.5, 6.5) -14%	11.9 ?(5.5, 6.4) -13%	0.28 ?(0.14, 0.14) 97%
Response Time Black / White *	5.4 ?(1.4, 4)	6.3 ?(2.5, 3.8) -17%	6.1 ?(1.6, 4.5) -13%	10 ?(5.5, 4.5) -85%	8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1) -65%	0.43 ?(0.22, 0.21) 92%
PWM Frequency						1438 ?(100)
Screen		-18%	8%	-37%	9%	-10%
Brightness middle	538	416 -23%	545 1%	302 -44%	384 -29%	490.4 -9%
Brightness	508	392 -23%	536 6%	314 -38%	366 -28%	498 -2%
Brightness Distribution	88	86 -2%	89 1%	86 -2%	91 3%	97 10%
Black Level *	0.47	0.38 19%	0.41 13%	0.38 19%	0.35 26%
Contrast	1145	1095 -4%	1329 16%	795 -31%	1097 -4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.9	2.33 -23%	1.6 16%	2.97 -56%	0.97 49%	3.2 -68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4	6.07 -52%	4 -0%	5.63 -41%	3.57 11%	6.04 -51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	3.7 -37%	2.4 11%	5.45 -102%	1.5 44%	1 63%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.161 ^102%	2.25 ^98%	1.994 ^110%	2.24 ^98%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	7027 ^93%	7102 ^92%	6737 ^96%	6520 ^100%	6709 ^97%	6373 ^102%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		1.02	0.8	2.24	0.77	0.84
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-14% / -15%	16% / 12%	-31% / -32%	-12% / -2%	35% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.4 ms rise
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.4 ms rise
10.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8458 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能 - 最高 128 GB 内存

笔记本电脑的最大内存容量受购买者所选处理器的影响。与酷睿至尊 9 275HX，您最多可选择 128 GB（DDR5-6400）。

测试条件

申克公司允许用户在各种能量曲线和手动模式之间进行选择，所有这些都可以通过热键方便地切换。我们在进行基准测试和测量时使用了 "超增压 "模式。发烧友模式是电池模式下的最大值。

能源概况	TDP	CB24 Multi	TGP	Time Spy 图形	CP2077 QHD	最大风扇噪音排放
平衡型	45 瓦	1,348 点	125 瓦	16,186 点	78.9fps	44.9 dB(A)
发烧级	90/75 瓦	1,833 分	130 瓦	16,835 分	80.7fps	49.4 dB(A)
超增压	150/135 瓦	2,072 分	140 瓦	17,239 分	81.6fps	53.3 dB(A)
电池（发烧友）	40 瓦	1,234 分	60 瓦	11,262 分	22fps	37 dB(A)

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HX

由于笔记本电脑的最大 TDP 为 150 瓦，因此无法利用酷睿至尊 9 275HX的全部潜力。因此，一些游戏笔记本电脑的多核性能要稍高一些。尽管如此，它的整体性能还是非常出色的。酷睿 i9-14900HX在所有 CPU 基准测试中都比旧版 XMG Pro 16 Studio 中的酷睿 i9-14900HX 高出 21%。此外，在连续负载情况下，它的性能一般都非常稳定。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5384 (5315.61-5570.25)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3394 (3129.4-4350.66)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5851 (5702.07-5999.7)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4230 (4151.1-4590.84)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5698 (5601.46-5746.3)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	86.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	85.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	85 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	83.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 ^-2! Intel Core i9-14900HX	75.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	70.1 pt
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 ^-10! AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	65.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	61.9 pt

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2207 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1913 - 2223, n=6)	2109 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2060 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2057 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	1393 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming (331 - 2298, n=63, last 2 years)	1348 Points -34%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	138 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	137.3 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (130.5 - 138, n=6)	134.8 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	134 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	118.8 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138, n=64, last 2 years)	118 Points -14%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	36597 (34151.5^min - 36596.9^max) Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	36437 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (33449 - 39001, n=8)	36041 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	34981 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	29686 (26317.7^min - 29686^max) Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	28075 Points -23%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40117, n=145, last 2 years)	22440 Points -38%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	16747 Points -54%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2246 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2195 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2192 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2126 - 2252, n=8)	2187 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2122 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2049 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2252, n=145, last 2 years)	1908 Points -15%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1741 Points -22%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14347 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (13178 - 15517, n=8)	14190 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14183 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	13934 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	11319 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	10474 Points -27%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 15751, n=145, last 2 years)	8626 Points -40%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6715 Points -53%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	861 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	859 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (811 - 866, n=8)	843 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	831 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	812 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	789 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 866, n=145, last 2 years)	734 Points -15%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	661 Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6000 (5702.07^min - 5999.7^max) Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5746 (5601.46^min - 5746.3^max) Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (5044 - 6060, n=8)	5650 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5570 (5315.61^min - 5570.25^max) Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	4591 (4151.1^min - 4590.84^max) Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	4350 Points -22%
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6232, n=148, last 2 years)	3465 Points -38%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2697 Points -52%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	340 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	336 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	335 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (317 - 343, n=8)	334 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	299 Points -11%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	282 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=145, last 2 years)	282 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	281 Points -16%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=139, last 2 years)	168.4 Seconds * -83%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	130 Seconds * -41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	113 Seconds * -23%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (86 - 102, n=8)	92.3 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	92 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	90 Seconds * +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	86 Seconds * +7%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	118614 MIPS +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	117940 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	117523 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (104686 - 122818, n=8)	115603 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	115585 MIPS -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	104193 MIPS -11%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 144064, n=143, last 2 years)	85294 MIPS -27%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	7039 MIPS
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	7036 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	6914 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	6776 MIPS -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6186 - 7039, n=8)	6755 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6607 MIPS -6%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=143, last 2 years)	6309 MIPS -10%

Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	20349 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	19535 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=9)	19406 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	19081 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	18126 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	17086 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=126, last 2 years)	14729 Points -28%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13538 Points -33%

Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3111 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3052 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2917 - 3158, n=9)	3049 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3012 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2889 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2764 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=126, last 2 years)	2699 Points -13%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2684 Points -14%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	23856 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	23308 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (21195 - 25855, n=8)	23241 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	22414 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	21299 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	18749 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=142, last 2 years)	15261 Points -36%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2252 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2199 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2034 - 2292, n=8)	2199 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2177 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2046 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	1941 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=142, last 2 years)	1925 Points -15%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	40.2 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	39.5 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	38.9 fps -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (35 - 41.2, n=8)	38.4 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	30.1 fps -24%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	26.5 fps -33%
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=143, last 2 years)	24.3 fps -38%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (36.9 - 88, n=8)	49.9 s * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	49.1 s *
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=141, last 2 years)	47.7 s * +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	46.4 s * +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	40.7 s * +17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	39.8 s * +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	36.9 s * +25%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=144, last 2 years)	0.4363 sec * -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=8)	0.4156 sec * -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4132 sec * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.409 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4049 sec *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.3978 sec * +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3917 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

5570 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

333 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

335 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

861 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

14347 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

36437 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2246 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

138 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

2057 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	95.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	92.4 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	91.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	89.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77 pt
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	72.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	66.5 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	39164 KRay/s +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (32615 - 39551, n=8)	36682 KRay/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	35760 KRay/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	34660 KRay/s
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	28109 KRay/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	25072 KRay/s -28%
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=143, last 2 years)	24182 KRay/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	21393 KRay/s -38%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	192417 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	183428 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (166245 - 194867, n=8)	183337 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	175476 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	129169 Points -26%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	116589 Points -34%
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=143, last 2 years)	113950 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110279 Points -37%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	9458 MB/s +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (7829 - 9482, n=8)	8865 MB/s +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	8828 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	8502 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	6285 MB/s -26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5615 MB/s -34%
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=143, last 2 years)	5187 MB/s -39%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	5155 MB/s -39%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	142503 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	138622 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	137820 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	136489 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (125013 - 139608, n=8)	134340 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	130726 Points
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	125820 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=143, last 2 years)	116539 Points -11%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15401 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	14115 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	13969 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	13926 Points -1%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	13857 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13846 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12272 - 14115, n=8)	13639 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 32988, n=143, last 2 years)	13593 Points -4%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	102847 Points +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (87156 - 104057, n=8)	96691 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	95742 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	91394 Points
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	63107 Points -31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	62567 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=143, last 2 years)	58052 Points -36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	52621 Points -42%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	175405 MB/s +36%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	134429 MB/s +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	134042 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	129264 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (118108 - 134920, n=8)	129234 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120213 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=143, last 2 years)	108322 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	107172 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	2202 MB/s +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1896 - 2220, n=8)	2069 MB/s +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	2067 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	2010 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1866 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1643 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=143, last 2 years)	1400 MB/s -30%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	1122.3 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	21122 KRay/s +14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (17631 - 21372, n=8)	19822 KRay/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	19630 KRay/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	18545 KRay/s
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	15215 KRay/s -18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13776 KRay/s -26%
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=143, last 2 years)	12984 KRay/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11481 KRay/s -38%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	53522 MPixel/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	52164 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (47726 - 56613, n=8)	51670 MPixel/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49676 MPixel/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	48831 MPixel/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	47726 MPixel/s -9%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	41477 MPixel/s -20%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62274, n=143, last 2 years)	40707 MPixel/s -22%

系统性能

无论是在日常使用中还是在基准测试中，Pro 16 都是一款超快的系统。在我们的测试中，系统稳定性没有任何问题。

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	89.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	88.8 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	88.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	87.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	83 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	82.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	77.8 pt
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 ^-5! Radeon RX 7600M XT, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	72.5 pt

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	9153 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	8856 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8550 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	8550 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	8550 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8166 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=130, last 2 years)	7937 Points -7%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	11290 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	11290 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11286 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	11215 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	11177 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years)	10770 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10725 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11014 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10139 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=130, last 2 years)	9896 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9591 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	9591 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	9590 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	9212 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	19351 Points +24%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	18305 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	15662 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	15662 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	14827 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=130, last 2 years)	12897 Points -18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	12511 Points -20%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2193 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	2193 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	2165 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2067 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	2017 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2002 Points -9%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 Radeon RX 7600M XT, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1993 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=110, last 2 years)	1923 Points -12%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2029 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	2029 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	2014 Points -1%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 Radeon RX 7600M XT, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1926 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1922 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1911 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1827 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=110, last 2 years)	1821 Points -10%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2531 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	2531 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	2451 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2371 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	2288 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2287 Points -10%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 Radeon RX 7600M XT, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2128 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=110, last 2 years)	2115 Points -16%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	1853 Points +3%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 Radeon RX 7600M XT, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1812 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1799 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	1799 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1769 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1734 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=110, last 2 years)	1713 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1597 Points -11%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	360 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	360 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	359 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	347 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	322 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	319 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=123, last 2 years)	306 Points -15%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	341 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	341 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	336 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	333 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	301 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	291 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=109, last 2 years)	269 Points -21%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 Radeon RX 7600M XT, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	220 Points -35%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming (404 - 674, n=134, last 2 years)	495 ms * -22%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 Radeon RX 7600M XT, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	479.6 ms * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	461 ms * -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	449 ms * -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	408 ms * -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	405 ms * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	405 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (n=1)	405 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		8550 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	86549 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	85889 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	85644 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74558 - 86549, n=8)	81822 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	78979 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	78788 MB/s -8%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	69550 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=143, last 2 years)	67286 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	97040 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	95542 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74094 - 97040, n=8)	86392 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86376 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85460 MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	83408 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 102937, n=143, last 2 years)	70199 MB/s -28%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	62147 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	86673 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	84581 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	84566 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72929 - 84581, n=8)	78801 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77346 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	73246 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73167 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=143, last 2 years)	69460 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 125.1, n=8)	112.8 ns * -7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	111.7 ns * -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	109.3 ns * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	105.8 ns *
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=143, last 2 years)	97.8 ns * +8%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT	94.3 ns * +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84 ns * +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.4 ns * +21%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的延迟测试中（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载），使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1791.8 μs * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1758.4 μs *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	1501.6 μs * +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	989.1 μs * +44%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	464.2 μs * +74%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

如果将 XMG Pro 16 配置为 Core Ultra 9 275HX，那么其两个 M.2 插槽中的一个已经支持快速 PCIe 5.0 连接。我们的测试设备配备了相应的三星 9100 固态硬盘（1 TB，用户可用容量为 868 GB）。在我们的测试过程中，它的传输速率非常高，峰值超过 10 GB/s，最重要的是，即使在长时间负载的情况下（约 10-12 GB/s），它的整体性能仍然相当稳定。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 11239 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6270 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 539 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 536 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 150.6 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 512 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1102 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	80.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	75.1 pt
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	75.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	72 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	62.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	59.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	59.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5359 (5332.25^min - 5358.62^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	5359 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4037 (3964.04^min - 4036.7^max) MB/s -25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	3998 (3658.3^min - 3998.4^max) MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming (281 - 7045, n=126, last 2 years)	3383 MB/s -37%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2556 (2209.35^min - 2555.51^max) MB/s -52%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	348 (183.29^min - 348.13^max) MB/s -94%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4834 (4439.32^min - 4834.12^max) MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	4147 (3521.83^min - 4147.33^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	4147 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4093 (4016.82^min - 4092.8^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=126, last 2 years)	3804 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	2759 (2615.78^min - 2759.16^max) MB/s -33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1922 (1819.62^min - 1921.76^max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	12505 (9384.86^min - 12505.3^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	12505 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	7069 (5962.41^min - 7069.08^max) MB/s -43%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7049 (5964.33^min - 7049.37^max) MB/s -44%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	6749 (5697.47^min - 6748.77^max) MB/s -46%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6636 (6205.02^min - 6635.75^max) MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 15056, n=126, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	7451 (4926^min - 7450.54^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	7451 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6896 (6883.77^min - 6896.11^max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	6169 (6112.09^min - 6168.56^max) MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	5343 (5220.28^min - 5342.91^max) MB/s -28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4949 (4932.28^min - 4948.61^max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 11581, n=126, last 2 years)	4918 MB/s -34%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	92.7 (91.49^min - 92.68^max) MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	84.4 (72.17^min - 84.41^max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	77.6 (25.64^min - 77.6^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	77.6 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	70.9 (23.28^min - 70.91^max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	68.3 (67.41^min - 68.26^max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 95.9, n=126, last 2 years)	66.9 MB/s -14%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	280 (277.46^min - 279.66^max) MB/s +79%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	251 (249.74^min - 251.16^max) MB/s +60%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=126, last 2 years)	221 MB/s +41%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	178.9 (178.49^min - 178.93^max) MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	156.5 (155.62^min - 156.47^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	156.5 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	153.8 (106.82^min - 153.79^max) MB/s -2%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4915 (4891.5^min - 4914.51^max) MB/s +402%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	4760 (4699.8^min - 4760.03^max) MB/s +386%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4055 (4044.11^min - 4055.48^max) MB/s +314%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=126, last 2 years)	2587 MB/s +164%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	979 (909.81^min - 979^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	979 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	722 (696.56^min - 722.01^max) MB/s -26%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	4433 (4354.58^min - 4433.43^max) MB/s +687%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3542 (3491.17^min - 3541.69^max) MB/s +529%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3522 (3439.08^min - 3521.99^max) MB/s +526%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 5588, n=126, last 2 years)	2132 MB/s +279%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	572 (544.97^min - 572.01^max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	563 (543.32^min - 563.01^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	563 MB/s 0%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9122 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	8609 Points
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	8609 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8364 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	7478 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=120, last 2 years)	6805 Points -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	6515 Points -24%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3590 Points +83%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	3234 Points +65%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3233 Points +65%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=120, last 2 years)	2430 Points +24%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1964 Points
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	1964 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	1667 Points -15%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5809 Points
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	5809 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	5036 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3703 Points -36%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3543 Points -39%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=120, last 2 years)	3197 Points -45%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1837 Points -68%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9199 MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	9199 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	5688.57 MB/s -38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5355.36 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	5315 MB/s -42%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5214.03 MB/s -43%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 9577, n=120, last 2 years)	4932 MB/s -46%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5793 MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	5793 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5143.63 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3950.35 MB/s -32%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 9486, n=120, last 2 years)	3771 MB/s -35%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	3444 MB/s -41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1587.46 MB/s -73%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	82.62 MB/s +68%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	76.57 MB/s +56%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	72.3 MB/s +47%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=120, last 2 years)	65.4 MB/s +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	63.16 MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	49.2 MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	49.2 MB/s 0%
4K Write
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	283 MB/s +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	250.73 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	226 MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	226 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (79.4 - 512, n=120, last 2 years)	216 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	213.76 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	208.4 MB/s -8%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2991.57 MB/s +201%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2615.17 MB/s +163%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	2602.02 MB/s +162%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3630, n=120, last 2 years)	1864 MB/s +87%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	1063 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	995 MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	995 MB/s 0%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5004 MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	5004 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	4408 MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2980.22 MB/s -40%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2933.74 MB/s -41%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=120, last 2 years)	2609 MB/s -48%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1427.9 MB/s -71%
Access Time Read
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=119, last 2 years)	0.05757 ms * -220%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.042 ms * -133%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	0.033 ms * -83%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.032 ms * -78%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	0.032 ms * -78%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms *
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	0.018 ms * -0%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	0.073 ms * -356%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.059 ms * -269%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=120, last 2 years)	0.05057 ms * -216%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms * -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.016 ms *
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (n=1)	0.016 ms * -0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	0.014 ms * +12%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12031 (11057.44-12746.79)

图形卡

XMG Pro 16（E25）专门使用新的英伟达GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑配备 12GB VRAM。这是速度最快的机型，TGP 高达 140 瓦（115 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost）。正如我们在分析中已经看到的分析中已经看到，RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑在游戏时还能从这一高功耗限制中获益，而不像旧的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑.图形切换通过普通 Optimus 技术进行，即没有高级 Optimus。虽然安装了 MUX 开关，但必须重新启动系统才能停用 iGPU。

我们在分析中已经展示了综合基准分析简而言之，新款 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑与旧款 RTX 4080 笔记本电脑.新款 Pro 16 在合成测试中比前代产品领先约 40%，在标准 1080p 游戏测试中领先约 20%。不过，在本机分辨率下，它的领先优势更大。总体而言，您可以流畅地玩所有现代游戏，并获得较高的游戏细节；您只需使用完整的光线追踪/路径追踪功能进行升频即可，我们也在下面展示了这一功能。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 ^-1! Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	100 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	92.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	80.9 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	80.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	64.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	59.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	56.1 pt
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 ^-3! AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	26.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	71866 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	61156 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	59337 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (54363 - 59337, n=3)	56464 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (10741 - 72215, n=137, last 2 years)	44733 Points -25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	43689 Points -26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	42753 Points -28%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	49153 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	48891 Points +10%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (43863 - 47933, n=3)	45457 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	44575 Points
Average of class Gaming (2913 - 56116, n=150, last 2 years)	32244 Points -28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	31105 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	30687 Points -31%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	22176 Points -50%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	23003 Points +33%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	21571 Points +25%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (17239 - 17981, n=3)	17540 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	17239 Points
Average of class Gaming (2295 - 24873, n=146, last 2 years)	13599 Points -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13336 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	11959 Points -31%
Steel Nomad Score
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5156 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	4064 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (3840 - 4079, n=3)	3994 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1522 - 6163, n=35, last 2 years)	3606 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	2598 Points -36%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14620 Points +29%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	12068 Points +7%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (11330 - 11797, n=3)	11587 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	11330 Points
Average of class Gaming (984 - 16245, n=80, last 2 years)	9416 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	8041 Points -29%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1098 Points -90%

3DMark 11 Performance		45656 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		35805 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		17078 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		4064 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		17745 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score		18056 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	23 Seconds * -63%
Average of class Gaming (9.9 - 95, n=136, last 2 years)	20.5 Seconds * -45%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	19 Seconds * -35%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (14.1 - 15, n=2)	14.6 Seconds * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14.1 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	12 Seconds * +15%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	11.6 Seconds * +18%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=137, last 2 years)	34.7 Seconds * -37%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	34 Seconds * -34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	32 Seconds * -26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	25.3 Seconds *
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (24 - 25.3, n=2)	24.7 Seconds * +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	20 Seconds * +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	18 Seconds * +29%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=143, last 2 years)	287 Seconds * -95%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	233 Seconds * -59%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	205 Seconds * -39%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	148 Seconds * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	147 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	135 Seconds * +8%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (122 - 147, n=2)	134.5 Seconds * +9%

* ... smaller is better

DLSS & Frame Generation in 2.560 x 1.600
设置	Alan Wake 2 (High/Ultra + PT)	Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty (RT Overdrive)
原生	23.5fps	18fps
DLSS 质量	35.2fps	35.2fps
DLSS 性能	45.7fps	52.1fps
DLSS 质量 MFG x2	75.3fps	62.8fps
DLSS 质量 MFG x4	124.3fps	111.1fps

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	98.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	89.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	76.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	65.4 pt
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 ^-3! AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	41.9 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	156.2 (125.7^min, 114.4^P1) fps +20%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	144.3 (118.2^min) fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	129.9 (107.4^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 158, n=99, last 2 years)	94.1 fps -28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.1 (52.5^min) fps -33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	82.5 (68.4^min) fps -36%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	75.8 (50.76^min) fps -42%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	211.5 fps +35%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	180.3 fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	157 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	125.6 fps -20%
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=65, last 2 years)	123.7 fps -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	111.8 (87.2^min, 87.8^P0.1, 95.1^P1) fps -29%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	82.6 fps -47%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	164.1 (2.25^min, 125^P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	161 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	127.2 (5.17^min, 83.3^P1) fps -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126 (8.93^min, 83.3^P1) fps -22%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 168.2, n=123, last 2 years)	115.5 fps -28%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	210 fps +42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	189.6 fps +28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	147.8 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	131 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 210, n=139, last 2 years)	122.5 fps -17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.7 fps -19%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	84.3 fps -43%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	434 (21.5^min, 322^P1) fps +218%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	367 (164.3^min, 218^P1) fps +169%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 434, n=135, last 2 years)	235 fps +72%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	234 (27.8^min, 175.8^P1) fps +72%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	206 (37.8^min, 155^P1) fps +51%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	173 fps +27%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	136.4 (91.5^min, 97.9^P1) fps

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	188.9 (155.7^min) fps +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	185.3 (161^min) fps +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	175.5 (149.8^min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	174.8 (148.4^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	160.8 (136.5^min) fps -8%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=142, last 2 years)	150.8 fps -14%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	137.6 fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	124.5 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.5 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	117.5 fps
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	110.6 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 166.2, n=145, last 2 years)	104.7 fps -11%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop: Ø104.9 (99-109)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø77.5 (72.5-79.1)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD DLSS	QHD
GTA V (2015)				161		147.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	223	199.7	189.3	174.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	217	183.4	147.8			125.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	156.9	144.1	117.5
Strange Brigade (2018)	392	201	156.5	136.4		103.8
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)				157		109.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	188.6	169.2	144.6	129.9	91.6	81.6
Alan Wake 2 (2023)	108.9	103.5	96			64.5
F1 24 (2024)			250	108		71.2
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024)	152	142	100	94		65

排放与能源

噪音排放

XMG Pro 16 的风扇始终处于激活状态，但在空转和低负载（25 dB(A)）时，几乎听不到风扇产生的噪音。您也可以在 BIOS 中激活被动模式，但在这种情况下，风扇经常会短时启动，感觉噪音更大。在日常使用中，尤其是在平衡模式下，该设备能保持超静音，但在游戏和满负荷运行时，其高功率限制就会产生影响。在我们的测试中，根据模式的不同，噪音值大约在 45 到 53 分贝（A）之间，因此我们建议在游戏时使用耳机。我们的测试设备上没有其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		25 / 25 / 25 dB(A)
Load		45.5 / 53.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 Radeon RX 7600M XT, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
Noise		-13%	-5%	-5%	-3%	7%
off / environment *	23.3	25 -7%	24 -3%	25.1 -8%	23.9 -3%	22.9 2%
Idle Minimum *	25	28 -12%	24 4%	25.1 -0%	24.3 3%	22.9 8%
Idle Average *	25	31 -24%	30.1 -20%	30.4 -22%	24.3 3%	22.9 8%
Idle Maximum *	25	35 -40%	30.1 -20%	30.4 -22%	28.9 -16%	26.3 -5%
Load Average *	45.5	52 -14%	41.1 10%	35.2 23%	45.8 -1%	27.8 39%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	53.3	53 1%	54.2 -2%			54.2 -2%
Load Maximum *	53.3	52 2%	54.2 -2%	54.2 -2%	56.6 -6%	53.9 -1%
Witcher 3 ultra *					51

* ... smaller is better

温度

在空闲模式下和执行简单任务时，笔记本表面温度很低，但在高负载时温度会明显升高。虽然在测试过程中没有出现临界点，但一些测量点的温度超过了 40 °C。除了手指略微发热之外，我们在打字时没有发现任何问题。在压力测试中，CPU/GPU 的功耗分别为 60 瓦和 140 瓦，Pro 16 的总功耗为 200 瓦。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


39 °C	43.1 °C	39.4 °C
42.4 °C	43.2 °C	39.2 °C
33.8 °C	38.9 °C	36.8 °C

Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 39.5 °C


45.9 °C	43.4 °C	44.6 °C
39.2 °C	46 °C	40.8 °C
36.9 °C	35.1 °C	32.8 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 40.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 49 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


27.3 °C	27.6 °C	27.7 °C
27 °C	27.6 °C	27.5 °C
26.3 °C	25.8 °C	26.3 °C

Maximum: 27.7 °C
Average: 27 °C


27.4 °C	26.6 °C	26.6 °C
26.5 °C	26.7 °C	26.4 °C
26 °C	24.8 °C	25.3 °C

Maximum: 264 °C
Average: 52.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


36.6 °C	42.8 °C	37.6 °C
42.5 °C	43.6 °C	39 °C
32.6 °C	38.5 °C	35.2 °C

Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 38.7 °C


43.6 °C	42.4 °C	43.1 °C
42.6 °C	42.3 °C	41.3 °C
38.6 °C	32.4 °C	31.5 °C

Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 39.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10 °C / -18 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
Heat		-1%	24%	11%	12%	20%
Maximum Upper Side *	43.2	51 -18%	39.6 8%	54.7 -27%	43.8 -1%	42.6 1%
Maximum Bottom *	46	66 -43%	49.7 -8%	57.1 -24%	55.4 -20%	41.2 10%
Idle Upper Side *	27.7	35 -26%	26.3 5%	25.8 7%	32.8 -18%	32.6 -18%
Idle Bottom *	264	39 85%	27.3 90%	32 88%	36 86%	32.4 88%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

这两个立体声扬声器并不是最好的，因为声音相对较弱，就像它的前代产品一样。前代产品一样。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量

Pro 16 在空闲模式下的效率相对较高，但在负载情况下的数值符合预期。游戏时的功率约为 240-250 瓦，而在压力测试中，我们曾短暂看到高达 290 瓦的功率，随后这一数值迅速稳定在 240 瓦左右。由于提供的 250 瓦电源装置（非常小巧）可以提供 290 瓦的功率，因此在体积上完全够用。不过，我们测得的待机功耗为 2.1 瓦，这个数值太高了。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.17 / 2.1 Watt
Idle	11.7 / 16.6 / 17.1 Watt
Load	122.4 / 291.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 R7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Power Consumption		-51%	-12%	-13%	-18%	-78%
Idle Minimum *	11.7	31 -165%	10.8 8%	15.9 -36%	12.5 -7%	28.5 -144%
Idle Average *	16.6	33 -99%	17.7 -7%	20.1 -21%	24.6 -48%	38.8 -134%
Idle Maximum *	17.1	41 -140%	18.8 -10%	23.5 -37%	24.8 -45%	45.6 -167%
Load Average *	122.4	114 7%	139.4 -14%	111.7 9%	109.6 10%	132.2 -8%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	245	218 11%	295 -20%			318 -30%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	241	196.8 18%	291 -21%			319 -32%
Load Maximum *	291.5	250 14%	359.3 -23%	240 18%	284.9 2%	384 -32%
Witcher 3 ultra *				228	218

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø239 (218-283)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.8 (10.3-15.2)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø245 (225-261)

Power consumption with external monitor

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø192.4 (183.4-195.9)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø182.3 (181.4-183.7)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø44.1 (41-56.8)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø182.1 (179.4-184.7)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø185.3 (173.9-190.6)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.3 (7.97-13.3)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø241 (225-254)

运行时间

在亮度为 150 cd/m²（测试设备最大亮度的 57%）的情况下，笔记本电脑的 99.8 Wh 电池在 60 Hz 的 WLAN 测试中可持续 9 个多小时，在全亮度下可持续 6 个多小时。这些数值明显优于前代机型(73 Wh）相比有了明显提高。在设备打开的情况下，完整的充电过程需要 116 分钟（一小时后达到 80%）。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		9h 05min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		6h 11min

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 99.8 Wh	545 min
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh	469 min -14%
Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 R7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7600M XT, 80 Wh	437 min -20%
Average of class Gaming (85 - 889, n=120, last 2 years)	386 min -29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	337 min -38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh	323 min -41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	290 min -47%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh	390 min +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 99.8 Wh	371 min
Average of class Gaming (164 - 534, n=33, last 2 years)	313 min -16%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Back to the verdict

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) - 05/05/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

85 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

86%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

76 / 80 → 94%

Weight

60 / 10-68 → 86%

Battery

83 / 95 → 87%

Display

87%

Games Performance

92%

Application Performance

94%

Temperature

87 / 95 → 91%

Noise

73 / 90 → 81%

Audio

76%

Camera

34 / 75 → 45%

Average

62%

87%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
74.7%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 31.2%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Intel Core i7-14700K i7-14700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	1982
R9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G	1991
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max (16 cores), M4 Max 40-Core GPU	2015
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	2057
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2058
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2058
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	2060
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	45291
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	45291
TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	45615
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	45656
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 E24 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	45722
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	45938
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46207
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论 - XMG Pro 16 E25 是一次重大升级

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

外壳和连接

尺寸比较

可持续性

输入设备

显示屏 - IPS，300 赫兹

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 最高 128 GB 内存

测试条件

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HX

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

排放与能源

噪音排放

温度

发言人

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) audio analysis

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) audio analysis

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 audio analysis

Tuxedo Sirius 16 Gen 1 audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 audio analysis

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Notebookcheck 总评分

可能的替代品比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency