Notebookcheck Logo

XMG Apex 16 Max 与 XMG Pro 16 - RTX 5070 Ti 用 AMD 还是 Intel 更好?

XMG Apex 16 Max(图片来源:Notebookcheck)
XMG Apex 16 Max(图片来源:Notebookcheck)
来自德国制造商 XMG 的 Apex 16 Max 和 Pro 16 是两款非常相似的笔记本电脑,都配备了最快版本的GeForce RTX 5070 Ti。但是,AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX 和 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 这两款处理器哪个更适合 GPU 呢?
AMD Blackwell RTX 5000 Gaming Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Review Snippet Thunderbolt Windows Zen 5

我们最近评测了游戏笔记本电脑 XMG Apex 16 Max.它配备了最快版本的GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 和 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX,游戏性能非常出色。你必须牺牲一些功能,如高级 Optimus 或 Wi-Fi 7,但这在游戏时其实不是问题,而且由此产生的价格也非常公道。不过,XMG 还提供 Pro 16,这是一款非常类似的设备,将 5070 Ti 与英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 结合在一起。它最多可配备 128 GB 内存(AMD 只有 96 GB),支持 Thunderbolt 5,但 Pro 16 也要贵 100 欧元左右。那么,哪款机型更适合游戏呢?

CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance rating
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
83.4 pt
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
81.3 pt
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2057 Points +2%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2026 Points
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
138 Points +6%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
130.6 Points
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
36437 Points +1%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
35960 Points
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2246 Points +3%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2172 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
14347 Points +3%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
13963 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
861 Points +1%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
856 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
5624 (5340.45min - 5623.51max) Points
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5570 (5315.61min - 5570.25max) Points -1%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
336 Points
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
335 Points 0%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
92 Seconds * -8%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
85 Seconds *
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
139824 MIPS
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
117523 MIPS -16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
7374 MIPS
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
7039 MIPS -5%
Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
20349 Points +3%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
19725 Points
Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
3259 Points
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3111 Points -5%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
23856 Points +5%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
22716 Points
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2474 Points
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2252 Points -9%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
39.7 fps
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
39.5 fps -1%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
49.1 s * -1%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
48.7 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4049 sec * -18%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
0.3439 sec *

* ... smaller is better

英特尔处理器(150/135 瓦)的功耗略高于 AMD 处理器(135/130 瓦),但在我们的 CPU 基准测试中,Ryzen 9 9955HX 仍略胜一筹。Ryzen 型号在我们的游戏测试中也略占优势,但差距并不大,而且 Apex 16 Max 使用了较新版本的驱动程序,这也会对游戏性能产生积极影响。

Performance rating - Percent
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
99.6 pt
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
96 pt
Cyberpunk 2077
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
82.9 (69.5min) fps
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
81.6 (68.7min) fps -2%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset DLSS4 quality no FG
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
96.1 (82.8min) fps
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
91.6 (80.5min) fps -5%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
110.5 (92.1min, 95.8P0.1, 99P1) fps
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
109.2 fps -1%
Call of Duty Black Ops 7 - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset + Raytracing
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
39 fps
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
34 fps -13%
F1 24 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
72 (58min, 58P1) fps
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
71.2 (57min, 58P1) fps -1%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 2560x1440 High Quality
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
125.2 fps +3%
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
121.8 fps
GTA V - 2560x1440 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
157.3 (3.68min, 111.1P1) fps
Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25)
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
147.3 fps -6%

因此,如果您只关注性能,那么采用 AMD 处理器的 Apex 16 Max 略胜一筹,甚至价格更低一些。这两款设备都配备了相同的 IPS 或 Mini-LED 屏幕,因此只有在需要 128GB 内存和/或雷电 5 连接的情况下,配备英特尔处理器的 Pro 16 才有意义。

有关 XMG Apex 16 Max 的更多信息,请参阅我们的综合评测。 XMG Apex 16 Max与 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX 和GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 的更多信息,请参阅我们的综合评测。

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 新闻 > 新闻档案 > 新闻档案 2026 01 > XMG Apex 16 Max 与 XMG Pro 16 - RTX 5070 Ti 用 AMD 还是 Intel 更好?
Andreas Osthoff, 2026-01-27 (Update: 2026-01-28)