我们对这两款笔记本电脑的评测间隔了大约两个月,因为 Legion Pro 7 16比更实惠的 Legion Pro 5 16.
处理器 - 只有 Pro 5 有速度更慢、价格更实惠的选择
我们的两台评测机都配备了相同的处理器,即高端的 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 275HX.不过,只有 Pro 5 可选配性能稍逊的 超 7 255HX.
显卡 - RTX 5090 仅在 Pro 7 上提供
至于显卡,两者都可以单独配置,但我们的 Pro 7 配备了 英伟达GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑显卡,而 Pro 5 则采用 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑.有可能,两款笔记本电脑都可以买到相同的 GPU。不过,Pro 5 目前似乎只配备了 RTX 5060, RTX 5070或 RTX 5070 Ti。另一方面,Pro 7 也可配备 RTX 5070 Ti,但也可配备 RTX 5080 或 RTX 5090.
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
显示屏 - 几乎相似的 OLED 面板
让我们重点看看我们评测的两种配置。两者都采用了几乎相同的亮丽的 16 英寸三星 OLED 面板。两款面板的唯一区别是版本号中的一个字母(ATNA60HS01-0 和 ATNA60HU01-0)。显然,Pro 7 OLED 经过校准后色彩更准确,这可能与内容创作者有关。此外,它的响应时间也更快一些。不过,其余大多数规格相同或非常相似。
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H ATNA60HS01-0 (Samsung SDC420A), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Samsung ATNA60HU01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | |
---|---|---|
Display | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.5 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.1 | 94.4 0% |
Response Times | 27% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 0.28 ? 86% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.4 ? | 0.43 ? 69% |
PWM Frequency | 1300 | 1438 ? |
PWM Amplitude * | 16.7 | 29 -74% |
Screen | 11% | |
Brightness middle | 518 | 490.4 -5% |
Brightness | 522 | 498 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 97 0% |
Black Level * | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.49 | 3.2 -29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.25 | 6.04 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.15 | 0.84 61% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.02 | 1 67% |
Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6426 101% | 6373 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
通信 - Wi-Fi 6 与 Wi-Fi 7
在无线连接方面还有一个不同之处。Legion 5 倒退了一步,只配备了 Wi-Fi 6,而前代产品则配备了 Wi-Fi 6E。在同类产品中,它的传输速率也相对较慢。相比之下,Legion 7 支持 Wi-Fi 7,传输速率较快。两个 Wi-Fi 模块都可以更换,因此Legion 5 可以在这方面进行升级。
冷却系统 -Legion Pro 7 中的更多风扇
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Western Digital PC SN8000S SDEPNRK-1T00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | |
---|---|---|
Noise | 13% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 22.9 5% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 22.9 5% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 22.9 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.9 | 26.3 15% |
Load Average * | 55.9 | 27.8 50% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 56.72 | 54.2 4% |
Load Maximum * | 56.72 | 53.9 5% |
* ... smaller is better
CPU 性能比较 - 持续负载下的差异
冷却系统也可能导致性能差异。在 Cinebench R15 连续循环的前五次运行中,Pro 5 CPU 的性能下降了约 7%,而 Pro 7 的相同 CPU 性能保持不变,没有出现节流现象。两项基准测试均在性能模式下进行。不过,除了持续性能外,两款机型在所有 CPU 基准测试中的表现都差不多,这意味着 Pro 5 只有在长时间持续负载的情况下才会出现极小的性能损失。
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
Average of class Gaming |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30712 - 40970, n=17) | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=146, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2009 - 2267, n=17) | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=146, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12026 - 16108, n=17) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=146, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (774 - 870, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=146, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4756 - 6271, n=17) | |
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=146, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (306 - 343, n=17) | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=144, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82 - 116, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (98236 - 124155, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=144, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6063 - 7149, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=144, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=18) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=140, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2886 - 3160, n=18) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=140, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (19105 - 25855, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=143, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2033 - 2292, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=143, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30.7 - 43.8, n=17) | |
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=144, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (33.2 - 62.1, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=17) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H |
* ... smaller is better
延迟 - Pro 7 的优势
在延迟测试中,Pro 7 的表现更好,延迟时间不到 Pro 5 的一半。在 YouTube 测试中,Pro 5 共丢帧 18 次,而 Pro 7 仅丢帧一次。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器 - 领带
尽管它们来自不同的制造商,但联想游戏笔记本中的两块固态硬盘却非常相似。这两款设备都不能说是优胜者,尤其是固态硬盘通常会根据具体配置的不同而有所差异。
Sustained read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形性能 - 在 3DMark 中仅略有提升
不用说,考虑到这些笔记本配备了两种不同的显卡,进行适当的 GPU 比较是具有挑战性的。尽管如此,RTX 5070 Ti 和 RTX 5080 在性能方面基本接近。在 3DMark 中,搭载 RTX 5080 的Legion 7 只比搭载 RTX 5070 Ti 的Legion 5 领先约 4%至 5%,差距相当微不足道。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 -1! | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
Average of class Gaming |
游戏性能 - RTX 5070 Ti 对 RTX 5080
在我们的游戏测试中,Pro 7 的 RTX 5080 在合成基准测试中与两款 GPU 的差距似乎微乎其微,但在游戏测试中却表现出了真正的优势。在所有测试游戏中,7 系列都领先约 16%。在《赛博朋克 2077》中,随着时间的推移,Pro 7 系列的性能也明显优于价格更高的笔记本电脑。但是,如果两款机型采用相同的图形处理器,我们能得出它们之间存在潜在差异的结论吗?其实不然,因为Legion 5 图形看起来也非常稳定。只是,RTX 5070 Ti 的性能自然要低于 RTX 5080。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 -1! | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 166.5, n=119, last 2 years) |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=84, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=123, last 2 years) |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 212, n=141, last 2 years) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=133, last 2 years) |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=144, last 2 years) |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 166.2, n=147, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS
判决
我们发现两种模式在以下三个方面存在差异:
- 规格:Pro 7 可以配备更强大的 GPU 和更快的 Wi-Fi。
- 显示屏:两款机型的 OLED 面板几乎完全相同。对于那些追求绝对准确色彩的用户来说,Pro 7 更胜一筹。
- 冷却系统:Pro 7 有第三个风扇,CPU 性能更稳定。此外,Pro 7 的温度和噪音都更低。
每个玩家都应根据售价权衡这些差异。即使配备 RTX 5070 Ti,Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H(或Legion Pro 7i 16)的价格也超过 3000 欧元。Legion Pro 5 16IAX10(或Legion Pro 5i 16)的价格通常要低几百欧元。在德国,这两款机型可直接在联想公司购买,其中 Pro 7 售价为 3099 欧元,Pro 5 约为 2500 欧元。