Notebookcheck Logo

联想Legion Pro 5i 16 与Legion Pro 7i 16:我们对两者进行了评测

联想Legion Pro 7 与 Pro 5
联想Legion Pro 7 与 Pro 5
我们测试了Legion Pro 5 和Legion Pro 7 的 16 英寸版本。Pro 7 的价格要贵得多,那么它们有什么区别呢?我们将为您一一说明,并看看我们的基准测试结果。
Arrow Lake Benchmark Blackwell RTX 5000 CPU Gaming Geforce GPU Intel Laptop / Notebook Wi-Fi 7

我们对这两款笔记本电脑的评测间隔了大约两个月,因为 Legion Pro 7 16比更实惠的 Legion Pro 5 16.

处理器 - 只有 Pro 5 有速度更慢、价格更实惠的选择

我们的两台评测机都配备了相同的处理器,即高端的 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 275HX.不过,只有 Pro 5 可选配性能稍逊的 超 7 255HX.

显卡 - RTX 5090 仅在 Pro 7 上提供

至于显卡,两者都可以单独配置,但我们的 Pro 7 配备了 英伟达GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑显卡,而 Pro 5 则采用 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑.有可能,两款笔记本电脑都可以买到相同的 GPU。不过,Pro 5 目前似乎只配备了 RTX 5060, RTX 5070或 RTX 5070 Ti。另一方面,Pro 7 也可配备 RTX 5070 Ti,但也可配备 RTX 5080 或 RTX 5090.

显示屏 - 几乎相似的 OLED 面板

让我们重点看看我们评测的两种配置。两者都采用了几乎相同的亮丽的 16 英寸三星 OLED 面板。两款面板的唯一区别是版本号中的一个字母(ATNA60HS01-0 和 ATNA60HU01-0)。显然,Pro 7 OLED 经过校准后色彩更准确,这可能与内容创作者有关。此外,它的响应时间也更快一些。不过,其余大多数规格相同或非常相似。

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
ATNA60HS01-0 (Samsung SDC420A), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Samsung ATNA60HU01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Display
0%
Display P3 Coverage
99.9
99.5
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94.1
94.4
0%
Response Times
27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
0.28 ?(0.14, 0.14)
86%
Response Time Black / White *
1.4 ?(0.8, 0.6)
0.43 ?(0.22, 0.21)
69%
PWM Frequency
1300
1438 ?(100)
PWM Amplitude *
16.7
29
-74%
Screen
11%
Brightness middle
518
490.4
-5%
Brightness
522
498
-5%
Brightness Distribution
97
97
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.49
3.2
-29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.25
6.04
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.15
0.84
61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.02
1
67%
Gamma
2.37 93%
2.24 98%
CCT
6426 101%
6373 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
13% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

通信 - Wi-Fi 6 与 Wi-Fi 7

在无线连接方面还有一个不同之处。Legion 5 倒退了一步,只配备了 Wi-Fi 6,而前代产品则配备了 Wi-Fi 6E。在同类产品中,它的传输速率也相对较慢。相比之下,Legion 7 支持 Wi-Fi 7,传输速率较快。两个 Wi-Fi 模块都可以更换,因此Legion 5 可以在这方面进行升级。

0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1402 (997-1490)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1564 (1521-1603)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX203; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø957 (459-1006)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1194 (998-1286)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX203; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø873 (858-887)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (1065-1393)

冷却系统 -Legion Pro 7 中的更多风扇

我们打开这两款游戏笔记本电脑,看看它们的内部差异。结果发现,只有 Pro 7 有第三个小风扇,这应该能带来更好的散热效果。不过,这样做也有缺点,因为风扇旁边多了一个金属盖,用户很难接触到某些部件进行维护。

Legion Pro 5i 有两个风扇
Legion Pro 5i 有两个风扇
Legion Pro 7i 有三个风扇和一个金属罩
Legion Pro 7i 有三个风扇和一个金属罩

由于有了第三个风扇,Pro 7 在负载情况下一般都能保持较低的温度,这可能是因为单个风扇不必转得那么快。Pro 7 的表面温度也低于 Pro 5。

Pro 5 的表面温度
Pro 5 的表面温度
Pro 7 的表面温度
Pro 7 的表面温度
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Western Digital PC SN8000S SDEPNRK-1T00
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
Noise
13%
off / environment *
24
22.9
5%
Idle Minimum *
24
22.9
5%
Idle Average *
24
22.9
5%
Idle Maximum *
30.9
26.3
15%
Load Average *
55.9
27.8
50%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
56.72
54.2
4%
Load Maximum *
56.72
53.9
5%

* ... smaller is better

CPU 性能比较 - 持续负载下的差异

冷却系统也可能导致性能差异。在 Cinebench R15 连续循环的前五次运行中,Pro 5 CPU 的性能下降了约 7%,而 Pro 7 的相同 CPU 性能保持不变,没有出现节流现象。两项基准测试均在性能模式下进行。不过,除了持续性能外,两款机型在所有 CPU 基准测试中的表现都差不多,这意味着 Pro 5 只有在长时间持续负载的情况下才会出现极小的性能损失。

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

02955908851180147517702065236026552950324535403835413044254720501553105605Tooltip
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5438 (5337.6-5885.82)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5698 (5601.46-5746.3)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
85.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
84 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
 
82.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
62.9 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
37507 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
36597 (34151.5min - 36596.9max) Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (30712 - 40970, n=17)
35740 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 40970, n=146, last 2 years)
23828 Points -36%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2248 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2195 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2009 - 2267, n=17)
2192 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2267, n=146, last 2 years)
1945 Points -13%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
14763 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
14183 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (12026 - 16108, n=17)
14001 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 16108, n=146, last 2 years)
9186 Points -38%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
863 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (774 - 870, n=17)
843 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
831 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 870, n=146, last 2 years)
749 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5886 (5337.6min - 5885.82max) Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5746 (5601.46min - 5746.3max) Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (4756 - 6271, n=17)
5630 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1537 - 6271, n=146, last 2 years)
3704 Points -37%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
336 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
334 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (306 - 343, n=17)
332 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 343, n=144, last 2 years)
288 Points -14%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (80 - 517, n=143, last 2 years)
160.7 Seconds * -66%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
97 Seconds *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (82 - 116, n=17)
95.9 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
90 Seconds * +7%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
117940 MIPS +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (98236 - 124155, n=17)
114149 MIPS +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
112452 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 148086, n=144, last 2 years)
88611 MIPS -21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (6063 - 7149, n=17)
6743 MIPS +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6687 MIPS
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6607 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7573, n=144, last 2 years)
6372 MIPS -5%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19885 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (16033 - 21668, n=18)
19475 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19081 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 22104, n=140, last 2 years)
15172 Points -24%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3089 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2886 - 3160, n=18)
3058 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3052 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3219, n=140, last 2 years)
2742 Points -11%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (19105 - 25855, n=17)
22977 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
22414 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
22302 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 27010, n=143, last 2 years)
16048 Points -28%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2246 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2033 - 2292, n=17)
2207 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2199 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=143, last 2 years)
1972 Points -12%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
39.1 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
38.9 fps -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (30.7 - 43.8, n=17)
38.2 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (7.7 - 44.3, n=144, last 2 years)
25.8 fps -34%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=142, last 2 years)
47.6 s * -43%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (33.2 - 62.1, n=17)
42.5 s * -28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
36.9 s * -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
33.2 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3551 - 0.759, n=145, last 2 years)
0.4309 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=17)
0.4139 sec * -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4132 sec * -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4093 sec *

* ... smaller is better

延迟 - Pro 7 的优势

在延迟测试中,Pro 7 的表现更好,延迟时间不到 Pro 5 的一半。在 YouTube 测试中,Pro 5 共丢帧 18 次,而 Pro 7 仅丢帧一次。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Western Digital PC SN8000S SDEPNRK-1T00
1123.5 μs *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
464.2 μs * +59%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器 - 领带

尽管它们来自不同的制造商,但联想游戏笔记本中的两块固态硬盘却非常相似。这两款设备都不能说是优胜者,尤其是固态硬盘通常会根据具体配置的不同而有所差异。

Sustained read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Western Digital PC SN8000S SDEPNRK-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6939 (6109.84-6958.07)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6982 (5720.4-7017.72)

图形性能 - 在 3DMark 中仅略有提升

不用说,考虑到这些笔记本配备了两种不同的显卡,进行适当的 GPU 比较是具有挑战性的。尽管如此,RTX 5070 Ti 和 RTX 5080 在性能方面基本接近。在 3DMark 中,搭载 RTX 5080 的Legion 7 只比搭载 RTX 5070 Ti 的Legion 5 领先约 4%至 5%,差距相当微不足道。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 -1!
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
100 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
89.4 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
 
84.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.4 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
71866 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
61651 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
  (50966 - 61651, n=7)
56866 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (10741 - 76300, n=137, last 2 years)
47147 Points -24%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
155373 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
  (134306 - 167048, n=4)
152739 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (84648 - 193851, n=62, last 2 years)
148703 Points -4%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
49153 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
46018 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
  (39170 - 47933, n=8)
44112 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 62849, n=151, last 2 years)
34198 Points -26%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
23003 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
17966 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
  (14945 - 17981, n=8)
16701 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 25763, n=147, last 2 years)
14421 Points -20%

游戏性能 - RTX 5070 Ti 对 RTX 5080

在我们的游戏测试中,Pro 7 的 RTX 5080 在合成基准测试中与两款 GPU 的差距似乎微乎其微,但在游戏测试中却表现出了真正的优势。在所有测试游戏中,7 系列都领先约 16%。在《赛博朋克 2077》中,随着时间的推移,Pro 7 系列的性能也明显优于价格更高的笔记本电脑。但是,如果两款机型采用相同的图形处理器,我们能得出它们之间存在潜在差异的结论吗?其实不然,因为Legion 5 图形看起来也非常稳定。只是,RTX 5070 Ti 的性能自然要低于 RTX 5080。

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
100 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
86.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
70.2 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
156.2 (125.7min, 114.4P1) fps +18%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
132.4 (106.3min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 166.5, n=119, last 2 years)
99.6 fps -25%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
211.5 fps +52%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
138.9 (70.9min, 84P0.1, 87.7P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 246, n=84, last 2 years)
131.7 fps -5%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
147.6 (2.55min, 90.9P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 186.9, n=123, last 2 years)
119.8 fps -19%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
210 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
181.4 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 212, n=141, last 2 years)
130.2 fps -28%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
434 (21.5min, 322P1) fps +23%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
353 (129min, 257P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 456, n=133, last 2 years)
250 fps -29%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
188.9 (155.7min) fps +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
174 (144.7min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 248, n=144, last 2 years)
152.6 fps -12%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
124.5 fps +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
116 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (33.4 - 166.2, n=147, last 2 years)
104.2 fps -10%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop: Ø120.4 (111.1-123)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop: Ø140.9 (134-145)

判决

我们发现两种模式在以下三个方面存在差异:

  • 规格:Pro 7 可以配备更强大的 GPU 和更快的 Wi-Fi。
  • 显示屏:两款机型的 OLED 面板几乎完全相同。对于那些追求绝对准确色彩的用户来说,Pro 7 更胜一筹。
  • 冷却系统:Pro 7 有第三个风扇,CPU 性能更稳定。此外,Pro 7 的温度和噪音都更低。

每个玩家都应根据售价权衡这些差异。即使配备 RTX 5070 Ti,Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H(或Legion Pro 7i 16)的价格也超过 3000 欧元。Legion Pro 5 16IAX10(或Legion Pro 5i 16)的价格通常要低几百欧元。在德国,这两款机型可直接在联想公司购买,其中 Pro 7 售价为 3099 欧元,Pro 5 约为 2500 欧元。

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 新闻 > 新闻档案 > 新闻档案 2025 07 > 联想Legion Pro 5i 16 与Legion Pro 7i 16:我们对两者进行了评测
Christian Hintze, 2025-07- 3 (Update: 2025-07- 3)