结论 - 对于游戏来说并不 "专业",但也许......?
典型的 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑通常比技嘉 A16 Pro 更厚、更重(也更强大)。凭借纤薄的机身、稳定的电池续航时间、低负载功耗和明亮的显示屏,它更适合作为经济实惠的入门级设备,用于移动视频编辑、本地 AI 工作负载或 3D 建模。RTX 5070 Ti 的额外 VRAM 在这里尤其有用。
然而,在连接性方面(只有 5 Gbps USB),我们期待的 "专业 "程度要高得多。更重要的是,该机缺乏优化。高延迟、固态硬盘节流和闲置功耗升高都显示出产品潜力的缺失。我们希望技嘉能在未来的更新中解决这些问题。
Pros
Cons
继去年的 技嘉游戏 A16之后,技嘉又推出了 Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro--配备了新的处理器、改进的 GPU,并有望在功能和散热方面进行升级。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底盘和构造 - 纤薄,但不太坚固
光滑纤薄的设计与去年的非 ProA16 完全相同。使用的塑料相当薄,使得黑色底座可以弯曲,同时产生吱吱嘎嘎的声音,尤其是左侧端口周围。
风格化的底板由特别柔软的塑料制成,薄薄的通风栅在压力下会弯曲到足以触碰到下面的风扇。
港口
尽管贴有 "Pro "标签,但该设备仍包括 USB 2.0,但缺少 Thunderbolt、USB 4、USB 3.2 Gen 2,甚至没有 SD 读卡器。
机身背面没有任何端口,而且由于侧面安装了排风口,所有连接位置都非常靠前,可能会影响鼠标的使用。
网络摄像头
A16 Pro 配备了支持 Windows Hello 的 FHD(1080p)红外网络摄像头,但没有物理快门。色彩准确度较差,但清晰度尚可。

输入设备 - 可靠的输入和导航
显示屏 - 500 尼特 WQXGA,sRGB
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 517 cd/m²
Contrast: 1326:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.62 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.75}
calibrated: 1.62
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.85 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
70.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
72.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
CCT: 6596 K
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) BOE0D86 (NS160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H NE160QDM-NYJ (BOE0C80), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX NE160QDM-NM9, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Samsung ATNA60DL03-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 NE160QDM-NZL (BOE0D55), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H ATNA60HS01-0 (Samsung SDC420A), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 21% | 25% | 2% | 24% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 72.5 | 69.4 -4% | 99.7 38% | 99.9 38% | 73.2 1% | 99.9 38% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.3 | 99.5 0% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 99.8 1% | 100 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 70.4 | 71.6 2% | 87.9 25% | 96.5 37% | 73.9 5% | 94.1 34% |
| Response Times | -78% | -164% | 96% | -28% | 71% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 6.8 ? | 14.3 ? -110% | 17.4 ? -156% | 0.2 ? 97% | 10 ? -47% | 2 ? 71% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 4.8 ? | 7 ? -46% | 13 ? -171% | 0.25 ? 95% | 5.2 ? -8% | 1.4 ? 71% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 20253 ? | 960 | 1300 | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 75 | 50 | 16.7 | |||
| Screen | -65% | 612% | 81% | -6% | -27% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 517 | 432 -16% | 742 44% | 390 -25% | 577 12% | 518 0% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 490 | 425 -13% | 733 50% | 394 -20% | 539 10% | 522 7% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 92 | 91 -1% | 93 1% | 98 7% | 85 -8% | 97 5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.39 | 0.37 5% | 0.01 97% | 0.04 90% | 0.5 -28% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1326 | 1168 -12% | 74200 5496% | 9750 635% | 1154 -13% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.62 | 4.76 -194% | 3 -85% | 1.61 1% | 2.12 -31% | 2.49 -54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.52 | 8.59 -144% | 4.3 -22% | 3.49 1% | 3.32 6% | 5.25 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.62 | 1.18 27% | 1.2 26% | 1.59 2% | 1.33 18% | 2.15 -33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.85 | 6.2 -235% | 3.6 -95% | 1.2 35% | 2.2 -19% | 3.02 -63% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.079 106% | 2.43 91% | 2.235 98% | 2.123 104% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6596 99% | 6690 97% | 6559 99% | 6580 99% | 6457 101% | 6426 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -48% /
-53% | 156% /
375% | 67% /
71% | -11% /
-7% | 23% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
| ↘ 3.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7966 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - 仅比非专业机型快一点
凭借其 RTX 5070 Ti, 酷睿 7 240H和 32 GB 内存,A16 Pro 显然将自己定位为一款游戏机。它纤薄的设计和明亮的显示屏也能引起初级内容创作者和视频编辑者的兴趣。
| 性能模式 | Cinebench R15 Multi | Fire Strike 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 FHD Ultra (fps) | 噪音 赛博朋克 (dB) | 功耗 赛博朋克 (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性能 | 2401 | 42580 | 96.3 | 56.18 | 165 |
| 平衡 | 2368 | 39276 | 89.4 | 47.62 | 140 |
| 静音 | 2136 | 30977 | 56.4 | 33 | 86 |
| 电池(性能) | 1735 | 15631 | 30 |
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 7 240H配备 6 个性能内核和 4 个效率内核,主频为 1.8 至 5.2 GHz。遗憾的是,它未能超越前代产品使用的 i7-13620H。即使在涡轮增压模式下,TDP 也被限制在 82 W,不过也有可能达到 115 W。许多 RTX 5070 Ti 游戏笔记本电脑都配备了更快的 CPU,而联想Legion 5 Pro 的 CPU 性能则落后近 80%。
使用电池供电时,CPU 性能下降约 28%。
Cinebench R15 多重测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9107 - 40970, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (10488 - 16588, n=5) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1166 - 2267, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (1649 - 1905, n=5) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (3504 - 16108, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (4535 - 6386, n=5) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (442 - 870, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (633 - 730, n=5) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (1800 - 2582, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (242 - 276, n=5) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (195 - 281, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 334, n=126, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (33491 - 148086, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (45123 - 65058, n=5) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (5061 - 6172, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5801 - 22104, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (9713 - 13681, n=6) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3259, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (2348 - 2648, n=6) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5847 - 27010, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (8072 - 12276, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2474, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (1644 - 1862, n=5) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (11 - 44.3, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (12.7 - 19, n=5) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (51.2 - 72.8, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (0.4329 - 0.4992, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3439 - 0.759, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 -1! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 -1! | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) -1! | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora -1! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -1! | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10227 - 85542, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (11867 - 15972, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (51376 - 238426, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (59260 - 80238, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2180 - 9817, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (2455 - 3287, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (75356 - 86602, n=3) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (7777 - 9366, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25115 - 128721, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (29381 - 39967, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (50528 - 67855, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (725 - 951, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5509 - 45446, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (6389 - 8569, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (21710 - 44874, n=5) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (2930 - 2938, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2930 - 2938, n=2, last 2 years) | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (8234 - 8407, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (5828 - 10060, n=108, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 12600, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (9053 - 9807, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (13391 - 13612, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 16716, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7505 - 19351, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (11348 - 13301, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (1740 - 1852, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (1613 - 1732, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (1925 - 1996, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (1611 - 1809, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (257 - 264, n=2) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (238 - 239, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (552 - 555, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8407 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 108104, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (34965 - 69215, n=5) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (39706 - 71870, n=5) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (33560 - 80488, n=5) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (97.1 - 125.6, n=5) | |
| Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 259, n=127, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
1 TB 三星固态硬盘本身速度非常快,但在 A16 Pro 中却受到热节流的影响,导致传输速率极不稳定。这令人失望,尤其是 A16 也存在类似问题。
* ... smaller is better
阅读时间DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 39170 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 64779 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 30580 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 14995 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
虽然 A16 Pro 无法与竞争对手的系统相媲美,但它能轻松处理原始分辨率。只要不涉及路径追踪(如在 F1 25 中),性能就能保持稳定,而且 DLSS 也能在需要时提供帮助。不过,达到面板 165 Hz 刷新率的情况并不多见,即使在全高清模式下也是如此。
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (37.9 - 215, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro v 17 (ANV17-41-R4CJ) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 152 | 162.5 | 147.3 | 98 | 98.9 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160.8 | 137.5 | 133.1 | 123.6 | 120.1 | |||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 117.4 | 115.6 | 108.9 | 103.9 | ||||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 132.7 | 113.8 | 92.5 | 75.5 | ||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 422 | 335 | 305 | 274 | 201 | 113.5 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 156 | 144 | 130 | 127 | 128.4 | 91.4 | 86.4 | 52.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 130.4 | 126.8 | 114.7 | 105.1 | 84.8 | 72.7 | 127.2 | 128.8 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 127.9 | 123.2 | 117 | 37.6 | 41.1 | 22.6 | 20.4 | 8.92 |
排放与能源 - 闲置功耗高
风扇噪音
空闲时,风扇通常是静音的,但长时间运转后,风扇转速会升至 24 分贝左右。
在游戏或繁重的工作负荷下,噪音水平可达到约 56 分贝--鉴于性能适中,噪音水平相对较大。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23 / 24.35 / 24.35 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 34.77 / 56.43 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | -7% | -17% | -14% | -14% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23 | 24 -4% | 25.9 -13% | 24 -4% | 25 -9% | 24 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23 | 25 -9% | 25.9 -13% | 24 -4% | 26 -13% | 24 -4% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.35 | 26 -7% | 26.5 -9% | 30 -23% | 27 -11% | 24 1% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.35 | 27 -11% | 26.5 -9% | 35 -44% | 30 -23% | 30.9 -27% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 34.77 | 54 -55% | 42.1 -21% | 53 -52% | 53 -52% | 55.9 -61% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 56.18 | 54 4% | 51 9% | 52 7% | 54 4% | 56.72 -1% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 56.43 | 55 3% | 51 10% | 54 4% | 54 4% | 56.72 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
顶部温度保持适中,而底部则越来越热,热点温度达到 50 ℃ 左右。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+2.8 °C / 5 F).
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -4% | 2% | 3% | -7% | -11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 42 | 50 -19% | 46.5 -11% | 47 -12% | 49 -17% | 48 -14% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 49 | 49 -0% | 46.4 5% | 55 -12% | 50 -2% | 50 -2% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 34 | 35 -3% | 32.1 6% | 28 18% | 36 -6% | 38 -12% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 36 | 34 6% | 33.5 7% | 29 19% | 37 -3% | 42 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
| CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度 (°C) | ||
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.9 | 1724 | 71 | 86 | |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 2 | 2180 | 74 | 84 |
发言人
双 2 W 扬声器虽然高音均衡,但低音和整体功率不足。耳机插孔可用于耳机或外接音频设备。
Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
在负载情况下,A16 Pro 是效率较高的 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑之一。但是,即使在长时间测量(dGPU 未激活,无后台进程)的情况下,空闲功耗仍然过高。
在某些情况下,"静音 "和 "平衡 "模式比 "性能 "模式耗电更多。这是制造商急需改进的地方。
当通过 HDMI 连接到外部显示器时,dGPU 将处于活动状态,从而进一步略微增加空闲功耗。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BTW, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Phison E31 2 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Western Digital PC SN8000S SDEPNRK-1T00, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | -26% | 21% | -15% | -21% | -6% | 5% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 21.5 | 9 58% | 15.4 28% | 3.9 82% | 17.8 17% | 14 35% | 14.1 ? 34% | 13.6 ? 37% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 28.3 | 11 61% | 29.9 -6% | 11 61% | 20.7 27% | 14.3 49% | 22.8 ? 19% | 19.3 ? 32% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 26.3 | 23 13% | 30.1 -14% | 16.9 36% | 23.4 11% | 20.1 24% | 26.4 ? -0% | 24.8 ? 6% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 92.5 | 91 2% | 136.4 -47% | 123 -33% | 110 -19% | 177 -91% | 129.9 ? -40% | 109 ? -18% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 165 | 132.5 20% | 231 -40% | 152.7 7% | 233 -41% | 255 -55% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 158 | 130 18% | 226 -43% | 144.9 8% | 232 -47% | 255 -61% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 195 | 155 21% | 315 -62% | 229 -17% | 297 -52% | 294 -51% | 283 ? -45% | 254 ? -30% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量 赛博朋克 / Stresstest
带外部监视器时的耗电量
电池寿命
电池容量为 76 Wh,在同类产品中处于较低水平。不过,在 Wi-Fi 测试中,这款笔记本电脑的续航时间达到了 8.3 小时,表现非常出色。
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 76 Wh | Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh | Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 76 Wh | Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -7% | -41% | -40% | -24% | -41% | -18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 8.3 | 7.7 -7% | 4.9 -41% | 5 -40% | 6.3 -24% | 4.9 -41% | 6.78 ? -18% |
| H.264 (h) | 4.8 | 7.93 ? | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.7 | 1.512 ? |
Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti)
- 03/19/2026 v8
Christian Hintze
可能的替代方案
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | List Price: 2300 Euro | 2.4 kg | 22.99 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA6H Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,355.68 GIGABYTE - Gaming A16 Gaming... 2. $1,041.69 GIGABYTE - Gaming A16 Gaming... 3. $939.22 GIGABYTE - Gaming A16 Gaming... List Price: 1700 EUR | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
| Alienware 16 Aurora Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | List Price: 1100 USD | 2.6 kg | 15.2 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
| Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2600 EUR | 2.5 kg | 22.7 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1099 EUR | 2.2 kg | 23.2 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761 Intel Core 7 250H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: List Price: 1300 EUR | 2.2 kg | 29 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.









































































