结论 - 速度最快的 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑之一
在我们的评测中,Erazer Major 16 X1 几乎没有暴露出明显的缺点。除了怠速温度升高、扬声器效果不佳以及负载情况下(游戏模式下)明显的风扇噪音之外,没有其他严重的缺点。这款基于同方的机箱以其坚固的结构、丰富的端口选择和灵敏的输入设备给人留下了深刻印象。其他亮点还包括明亮的 QHD+ 显示屏和出色的色彩准确性。紧凑的 250 瓦电源和机械式网络摄像头快门也值得称赞。
在性能方面,Medion 的表现可圈可点。酷睿至尊 7 255HX 和GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 确保了应用程序和游戏的高速度,尤其是稳定的速度。综上所述,我们可以自信地推荐 16 英寸机型
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 在多家在线零售商(如notebooksbilliger.de)的售价约为 2,600 欧元(约合 2,800 美元)。
为了检验 Major 16 X1 的性能,我们将其与以下竞争对手进行了比较:微星 微星卡塔纳 17 HX(RTX 5070)、 微星 Vector 16 HX AI(RTX 5070 Ti)和强大的 Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1(RTX 5080).为了方便起见,我们还将上一代 Erazer 主要 X20配备了 RTX 4070纳入对比表格。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底盘
Major 16 X1 的底盘与我们在 2023 年测试的 Major X20 有很大不同。Medion 采用了高度坚固的结构,金属盖和橡胶顶面给人一种高档的感觉。Medion 还为显示屏的 180° 铰链加分。制造质量无可挑剔。16 英寸设备的重量约为 2.5 千克,比上一代产品略重,但比 Vector 16 稍轻。
连接性和功能
Major 16 X1 提供多种端口。在 USB 端口方面,有四个 USB 3.2 Gen1 端口(3 个 Type-A、1 个 Type-C)和一个 USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C 端口,支持 Power Delivery 和 Thunderbolt 4。外部显示器可通过 HDMI 2.1 或 DisplayPort 2.1a 连接。其他功能包括 2.5 Gbit 以太网、快速 SD 读卡器、组合音频插孔和 Kensington 锁插槽。
无线连接由英特尔的 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 模块负责,其性能符合预期。内置的全高清网络摄像头可提供不错的图像质量。
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (20 - 204, n=72, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=71, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
网络摄像头

维护
输入设备
显示屏
Medion 为 Major 16 X1 配备了支持 300 Hz 的 IPS 面板,格式为 16:10,分辨率为 2,560 × 1,600 像素。539 cd/m² 的平均亮度非常出色,明显优于所有对比机型。另一方面,对比度仅为 1,154:1,黑度略高 0.5 cd/m²。可视角度是 IPS 面板的典型表现,响应时间也在类似范围内。全 sRGB 色彩覆盖是另一个优点,不过一些竞争对手提供了更高的 AdobeRGB 或 DCI-P3 色彩空间覆盖。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 577 cd/m²
Contrast: 1154:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83, calibrated: 1.33
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
73.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.123
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 NE160QDM-NZL (BOE0D55), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz | Medion Erazer Major X20 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK CSOT MNH301CA3-1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG B160QAN02.3 (AUO7DB2), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 BOEhydis NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -4% | 18% | 15% | 16% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 73.2 | 69.4 -5% | 97.3 33% | 96.6 32% | 97.1 33% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 98 -2% | 99.6 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.9 | 70.9 -4% | 89 20% | 84.4 14% | 84.7 15% |
Response Times | -36% | -15% | 21% | 2% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 10 ? | 13.1 ? -31% | 5.2 ? 48% | 4.3 ? 57% | 5.6 ? 44% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.2 ? | 7.3 ? -40% | 9.2 ? -77% | 6 ? -15% | 7.3 ? -40% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -12% | -5% | -28% | -39% | |
Brightness middle | 577 | 374 -35% | 296 -49% | 473 -18% | 478 -17% |
Brightness | 539 | 357 -34% | 272 -50% | 426 -21% | 456 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 92 8% | 87 2% | 85 0% | 89 5% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.33 34% | 0.27 46% | 0.42 16% | 0.4 20% |
Contrast | 1154 | 1133 -2% | 1096 -5% | 1126 -2% | 1195 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.12 | 2.43 -15% | 1.35 36% | 3.47 -64% | 3.94 -86% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.32 | 3.97 -20% | 4.76 -43% | 7.24 -118% | 8.6 -159% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.33 | 1.4 -5% | 0.78 41% | 1.36 -2% | 0.75 44% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 3.1 -41% | 2.7 -23% | 3.1 -41% | 5.5 -150% |
Gamma | 2.123 104% | 2.191 100% | 2.201 100% | 2.486 88% | 2.212 99% |
CCT | 6457 101% | 6194 105% | 6770 96% | 6832 95% | 7059 92% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-14% | -1% /
-2% | 3% /
-12% | -7% /
-22% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.2 ms rise | |
↘ 6.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
Major 16 X1 的性能介于中端和高端之间。测试机型(MD62736)配备了 32 GB DDR5 内存(2x 16 GB),足够未来几年使用。2 TB NVMe 固态硬盘也是如此。
Medion 控制中心模式 | 静音 | 平衡 | 游戏 |
赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 34 dB(A) | 49 dB(A) | 54 dB(A) |
赛博朋克 2077》性能(FHD/超高清) | 30 fps 锁定 | 122 fps | 129 fps |
Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 2971 分 | 4008 分 | 4796 分 |
处理器
酷睿至尊 7 255HX 酷睿至尊 7 255HX是英特尔箭湖一代(8 个 P 核、12 个 E 核)的 20 核快速芯片,采用 3 纳米工艺制造。在我们的 CPU 基准测试中,Major 16 X1 表现出色。它不仅超越了较早的 Major X20(英特尔酷睿 i9-13900HX),而且还超过了采用相同 255HX 处理器的 Vector 16 HX。在整个 Cinebench 循环测试中,这款笔记本电脑的得分也很稳定。
Cinebench R15 multi sustained test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (27732 - 32373, n=2) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=141, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (140290 - 163570, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=141, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (6445 - 7513, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=141, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (115802 - 130615, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=141, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=141, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (11066 - 12035, n=2) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (72938 - 84513, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=141, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=141, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (96832 - 112828, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (1510 - 1752, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=141, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (15137 - 17617, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=141, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (39697 - 49664, n=2) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=141, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
系统性能
在系统性能方面,Major 16 X1 在测试领域排名第一,仅次于 Beast 18 X1。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
Average of class Gaming | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=128, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (7842 - 7858, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=128, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (10737 - 10773, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=128, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (9270 - 9510, n=2) | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=128, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (12817 - 13186, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (1944 - 2097, n=2) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=110, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (1845 - 1959, n=2) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=110, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (2249 - 2400, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (1468 - 1713, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (319 - 325, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=122, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (305 - 306, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=109, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=132, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (425 - 425, n=2) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7858 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (68939 - 77224, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=141, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (82336 - 85818, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=141, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (66479 - 133486, n=2) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=141, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (106.4 - 110, n=2) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=141, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Medion 为 16 英寸机型配备了速度极快的 Phison 2 TB SSD。在连续读取测试中,M.2 硬盘的速度有时甚至超过 10,000 MB/s。与同类设备一样,在持续循环测试中也没有出现明显的减速现象。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained read performance: DiskSpd read loop, queue depth 8
图形处理器性能
我们已经对英伟达GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 进行了多次测试。基于 Blackwell 架构的 12 GB 型号在 3DMark 中表现强劲,比上一代 RTX 4070 性能高出约 43%,比微星 Katana 17 中的 RTX 5070 性能高出约 35%。其性能还略高于我们迄今为止看到的 RTX 5070 Ti 的平均水平。与此同时,Beast 18 X1 中的 RTX 5080 仅领先 10%多一点。对于 Major 16 X1,Medion 允许的 TGP 为 140 瓦(包括动态提升)。
3DMark 11 Performance | 45294 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 74060 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 39810 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 16796 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (28 - 30.1, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (12.7 - 41.7, n=6, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (41.9 - 44.7, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.3 - 59.7, n=6, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (104.9 - 135.5, n=8) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 166.5, n=119, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (124.7 - 161, n=6) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=123, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop (135.8 - 181.4, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 212, n=139, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 |
的长期测试 赛博朋克 2077没有带来任何惊喜:Major 16 X1 的帧速率保持非常稳定。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 186 | 181 | 149 | 143 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 213 | 186 | 185.5 | 171.4 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 221 | 173.1 | 132.4 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 144.1 | 123.7 | 101.6 | |||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 188 | 161 | 156 | 103 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 166.9 | 143.2 | 129 | 80.8 | ||
Stalker 2 (2024) | 89.8 | 76.6 | 65.5 | 104.6 | 49.9 | |
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 153.5 | 126.7 | 88.2 | 86.1 | 62.7 | |
Civilization 7 (2025) | 212 | 202 | 141.9 | |||
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 94 | 81.8 | 42.9 | 44.7 | 30.1 | |
Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) | 94.9 | 86.1 | 85.4 | 82.5 | 59.1 |
排放量
噪音排放
在游戏模式下,这台 16 英寸笔记本电脑在负载情况下声音会相当大:53 至 54 分贝(A)的声音清晰可闻,可能会让人分心,因此建议使用耳机。尽管如此,一些竞争对手的噪音甚至更大,接近 60 dB(A)。在空闲模式下,Medion 笔记本电脑依然安静宜人,平均噪音为 27 dB(A),是测试中最低的。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26 / 27 / 30 dB(A) |
Load |
| 53 / 54 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -0% | -9% | -6% | -11% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 24 4% | 25 -0% | 25 -0% | 25 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 26 | 25 4% | 31 -19% | 33 -27% | 25 4% |
Idle Average * | 27 | 29 -7% | 32 -19% | 34 -26% | 39 -44% |
Idle Maximum * | 30 | 31 -3% | 34 -13% | 38 -27% | 42 -40% |
Load Average * | 53 | 50 6% | 50 6% | 46 13% | 52 2% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 54 | 58 -7% | 47 13% | 53 2% | |
Load Maximum * | 54 | 57 -6% | 59 -9% | 49 9% | 55 -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度给人的印象好坏参半。由于风扇噪音相对适中,机箱表面在空闲时已明显升温,温度达到 34 ℃ 左右。在负载情况下,机箱后半部分的温度会升至 50 °C,虽然温度较高,但对于游戏笔记本电脑来说仍属正常。尽管如此,我们还是希望掌托区域的温度能更低一些。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 46 °C / 114.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-17.1 °C / -30.8 F).
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | 1% | 5% | 10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 46 6% | 52 -6% | 53 -8% | 47 4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50 | 49 2% | 56 -12% | 52 -4% | 48 4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 37 -3% | 33 8% | 33 8% | 29 19% |
Idle Bottom * | 37 | 38 -3% | 32 14% | 29 22% | 33 11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
发言人
令人惊讶的是,音质与上一代产品相比有所退步。Major X20 在这方面的表现非常出色,而 Major 16 X1 却只能排在中下游。尤其是低音,还需要更多的深度和力量。
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Medion Erazer Major X20 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
耗电量基本没有什么特别之处。系统空闲时功耗在 18 到 23 瓦之间,负载时功耗在 110 到 297 瓦之间。对于该性能级别的设备来说,这些数值都很典型。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | 15% | 6% | 12% | 4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 17.8 | 12 33% | 9.7 46% | 7.1 60% | 7.9 56% | 14.3 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 20.7 | 16 23% | 15 28% | 15.9 23% | 11.5 44% | 20.4 ? 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.4 | 26 -11% | 23.7 -1% | 29.5 -26% | 16.6 29% | 27.4 ? -17% |
Load Average * | 110 | 115 -5% | 126 -15% | 124 -13% | 130 -18% | 107.6 ? 2% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 233 | 205 12% | 222 5% | 253 -9% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 232 | 202 13% | 217 6% | 245 -6% | ||
Load Maximum * | 297 | 319 -7% | 227 24% | 336 -13% | 330 -11% | 259 ? 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 191.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk and stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
这款 16 英寸笔记本电脑的电池容量为 80 Wh,介于 Katana 17(75 Wh)和 Vector 16(90 Wh)之间。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,屏幕亮度降低到 150 cd/m²,Major 16 X1 实现了 6.5 小时以下的稳定运行时间。
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 80 Wh | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 62.3 Wh | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 75 Wh | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 90 Wh | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -39% | -20% | 10% | 25% | 2% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 380 | 232 -39% | 305 -20% | 419 10% | 476 25% | 386 ? 2% |
Reader / Idle | 345 | 572 ? | ||||
H.264 | 252 | 459 ? | ||||
Load | 96 | 85.8 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 在很大程度上是一款性能出色、相当强大的 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑。
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736
- 07/02/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Comparable alternatives
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736 Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, SSD | List Price: 2600 EUR | 2.5 kg | 2.27 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... 2. $16.99 [2 Pack] Synvy Film Protecto... 3. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... List Price: 2499 Euro | 2.4 kg | 29 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK Intel Core i7-14650HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $49.99 230W 200W AC Adapter Replace... List Price: 1800 EUR | 2.7 kg | 28 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS | |
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,149.99 MSI Vector 16 HX AI 16” 24... 2. $1,899.00 EXCaliberPC (2025 MSI Releas... 3. $2,489.00 HIDevolution [2025] MSI Vect... List Price: 2000 EUR | 2.6 kg | 28.6 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, SSD | List Price: 3700 EUR | 3.6 kg | 30.4 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.