结论 - AMD 版本总体而言是较差的选择
微星的 Claw 是为数不多的配备英特尔处理器的游戏掌机之一，得益于高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器，虽然价格昂贵，但整体性能确实不错。然而，我们真的不明白为什么现在要在市场上推出搭载 AMD 处理器的 Claw 型号。AMD 版本并没有提供真正的附加值，尤其是新的外壳不符合人体工程学，肩部按钮和触发器的尺寸也有所减小，这一点并不合理。
总的来说，我们对微星采用不同的机箱感到惊讶。开发成本本应更好地用于软件优化，因为有必要迎头赶上，尤其是在能耗曲线方面。在手动模式下，现在可以自由调整 CPU 参数，但之前具有合理 TDP 等级的子配置文件却被删除了。如果不想自己做太多实验，就只能使用人工智能引擎模式了。
在价格方面，两个型号的售价相同，都是 999 欧元，但 AMD 型号只有 24 GB 内存，而英特尔型号则有 32 GB。这也使得 Claw A8 比目前的 华硕 ROG Xbox Ally X相同的硬件（但 7 英寸显示屏较小），而后者在舒适度和能耗方面更具优势。对于喜欢 8 英寸大屏幕的用户，我们推荐 英特尔版本的 Claw.
Pros
+ 良好的游戏性能
+ 120 Hz 显示屏和 VRR
+ 坚固的外壳
+ 超长电池寿命
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 2x 雷电 4 和 Wi-Fi 7
+ 可移动 M.2 2280 固态硬盘
+ 快速 microSD 读卡器
Cons
- 笨重的能量曲线
- 人体工学设计弱于英特尔版本（外壳角度更大，肩部按钮和触发器更小）
- 尽管价格相同，但比英特尔版本少 8GB 内存
- 风扇有时在空闲时也会启动
- 没有网络摄像头
- 待机功耗高
$19.99
Hzycwgone Case for MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM,TPU Soft Grip Protective Cover Back Shell with Kickstand for MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM 8 inch 2025 PC Portable Handheld Gaming Console Lightweight Cover Case,Black
- $19.99CDCHGAM Protective Case for MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM 8-inch 2025 - TPU Cover with Fixed Kickstand & Cooling Vents, Compatible with Ryzen Gaming Handheld (Matte Black)
- $18.99JYGamhanbil Protective Case for MSI Handheld Claw A8 BZ2EM 8-inch 2025,TPU Grip Cover Back Shell Accessories with Ergonomic Grip & Kickstand Compatible with Ryzen Gaming Handheld(Black)
微星提供 Claw 8 AI+是市场上为数不多的英特尔游戏掌上电脑之一，现在又增加了一款 AMD 机型。Claw A8基于 AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme，其中包括 Radeon 890M，甚至还使用了新的外壳。除了我们熟悉的 8 英寸 IPS 显示屏外，还使用了 24 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD。该机的零售价仍为 999 欧元，因此与英特尔机型完全相同，但也比华硕 ROG Xbox Ally X 贵 100 欧元，其功能完全相同（但 7 英寸显示屏较小）。
规格
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (Claw Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme 8 x 2 - 5 GHz, 50 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point (Zen 5)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 890M, Core: 2900 MHz, RAM: 1000 MHz, Adrenalin 25.10.30
Memory
24 GB
, DDR5-8000, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
8.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 283 PPI, Capacitive, PN8007QB1-2, IPS, VRR, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, 1024 GB
, NVMe PCIe Gen4, 887 GB free
Weight
765 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
箱子和设备
微星决定为 AMD Claw 机型配备全新的机箱。这款外壳棱角分明，有两种颜色可供选择：白色和霓虹绿，背面为深灰色。从外观上看，白色机型不如银色的 英特尔机型(虽然现在也有白色版本）。外壳由塑料制成，做工和稳定性也不错，但棱角分明的手柄的人体工学设计稍差；Claw A8 在长时间使用时的舒适度根本不如英特尔版本。
不过，在功能方面，两个版本并无差异：除了两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口外，还有一个快速 microSD 读卡器和一个快速 Wi-Fi 7 模块。不过，AMD 版本的一个优势在于其内部布局：散热方式不同，为大型 M.2 2280 SSD 留出了空间。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (20.9 - 201, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (74.7 - 261, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Networking | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1812 (1701-1919)
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1731 (1713-1744)
可持续性
MSI 没有提供任何有关可持续发展、使用可回收材料或环保认证的信息。包装主要由纸板制成，可回收利用。
软件
微星为Claw A8配备了著名的 著名的M-Center软件.此外，您现在可以直接进入 Xbox 全屏模式，我们在华硕 ROG Xbox Ally X 的评测中已经对此进行了报道。
输入设备 - 霍尔效应触发器和摇杆
与 爪 8 AI+一样，AMD 型号也使用了非常精确的霍尔效应模拟摇杆和触发器。不过，我们对人体工学设计并不完全满意，因为肩部按钮和触发器都比英特尔版本的窄。当然，这有点取决于你的手掌大小，但对我们来说，使用起来并不舒服，手指的位置也不自然。肩部按键非常 "咔哒"，声音很大，而且很精确。另一方面，屏幕旁边的选项按钮给人的感觉相当廉价，而且声音也很大。
显示屏 - IPS，120 赫兹和 VRR
8 英寸 IPS 屏幕（1,920 x 1,200 像素）采用 120 Hz 和 VRR 技术，与英特尔机型无异。 英特尔型号.整体画质仍然非常出色，但相对较慢的响应时间仍然是一个弱点。PWM 闪烁现象不存在。
我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件进行的分析表明，出厂校准再次出现偏蓝现象，色温过低。这有利于最大亮度，平均亮度约为 530 cd/m²。通过我们自己的校准（配置文件可在下面的框中免费下载），我们可以明显改善显示效果，但亮度要低约 50 cd/m²。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
PN8007QB1-2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 563 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 529.7 cd/m² Minimum: 26.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 540 cd/m²
Contrast: 1588:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
73% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
71.1% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
CCT: 7507 K
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz | Asus ROG Xbox Ally X TL070FVXS01_0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | GPD Pocket 4 YHB03P24, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 ZDZ0501, OLED, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | MSI Claw 8 AI+ PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz | Lenovo Legion Go Legion Go Display, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -7% | 18% | 26% | -0% | 18% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 71.1 | 66 -7% | 92.7 30% | 99.43 40% | 71.1 0% | 92.1 30% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.8 | 93.1 -7% | 99.6 0% | 99.93 0% | 98.5 -1% | 99.56 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 73 | 68.3 -6% | 90 23% | 99.89 37% | 72.9 0% | 90.09 23% |
| Response Times | 49% | -16% | 62% | 1% | 8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 28.1 ? | 11.4 ? 59% | 27.9 ? 1% | 1.08 ? 96% | 23.7 ? 16% | 20.8 ? 26% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 13 ? | 8 ? 38% | 17.2 ? -32% | 9.3 ? 28% | 14.9 ? -15% | 14.4 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 120 ? | 700 | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 10 | |||||
| Screen | -4% | -18% | 45% | -7% | -38% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 540 | 490 -9% | 511.2 -5% | 833 54% | 524 -3% | 411 -24% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 530 | 459 -13% | 524 -1% | 830 57% | 514 -3% | 413 -22% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 90 | 86 -4% | 84 -7% | 90 0% | 93 3% | 80 -11% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.34 | 0.33 3% | 0.4 -18% | 0.064 81% | 0.33 3% | 0.42 -24% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1588 | 1485 -6% | 1278 -20% | 13016 720% | 1588 0% | 979 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 2.8 3% | 4.54 -57% | 6.7 -131% | 3.5 -21% | 5.94 -105% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.1 | 6.5 -7% | 8.96 -47% | 12.04 -97% | 7.3 -20% | 10.56 -73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 1.5 -15% | 0.95 27% | 2.95 -127% | 1.3 -0% | 2.95 -127% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 4.2 11% | 6.4 -36% | 11.99 -155% | 5.9 -26% | 0.92 80% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.213 99% | 2.22 99% | 1.93 114% |
| CCT | 7507 87% | 7381 88% | 8125 80% | 8033 81% | 7852 83% | 8064 81% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
3% | -5% /
-10% | 44% /
43% | -2% /
-5% | -4% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8111 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - AMD 手持设备，24 GB 内存
微星为 AMD 版本的 "魔爪 "配备了 24GB 内存，而 英特尔型号32 GB，价格相同。
测试条件
微星仍提供三种能源模式：运行时间、AI 引擎和手动。英特尔机型的手动模式仍有三个预定义子文件（8、17 或 30 瓦），而 AMD 机型则不再提供这些文件。取而代之的是，可以单独控制 SPL、SPT 和 FPPT 这三个参数。这在原则上也很好，但我们不明白为什么要取消以前的子文件，因为现在没有快速更改选项。因此，我们在默认激活的 AI 模式下进行了基准测试和测量。不过，微星应该解决这个问题。
处理器
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme处理器共提供 8 个内核（3x Zen 5 和 5x Zen 5c），在 AI 模式下，处理器的功耗可短暂达到 50 瓦，但随后会迅速降至 20 瓦。因此，CPU 的纯性能要比竞争对手弱一些。老实说，这在游戏时并不那么重要，如果需要更强的 CPU 性能，可以切换到手动模式。在电池模式下，性能保持不变。
Cinebench R15 多回路
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme: Ø1635 (1544.28-2069.96)
Asus ROG Xbox Ally X AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme: Ø2110 (2085.4-2260.78)
GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2402 (2245.42-2499.38)
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U: Ø2032 (1929.2-2053.81)
MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1491 (1472.1-1573.87)
Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø1914 (1836.13-2049.71)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go -2! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (12151 - 14586, n=2) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3984 - 16841, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (1954 - 1970, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1071 - 2006, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (4726 - 5825, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1521 - 6577, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (764 - 772, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (357 - 787, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (2070 - 2261, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (689 - 2533, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (155.1 - 304, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (190.7 - 275, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (189 - 588, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (234 - 296, n=2) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (45321 - 52461, n=2) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19684 - 66618, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (5434 - 5590, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3653 - 6143, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (10979 - 12734, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3950 - 13426, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (1888 - 2790, n=3) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1333 - 2904, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (10464 - 11222, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3932 - 11975, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (1323 - 2017, n=2) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (875 - 2134, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (14.7 - 17.9, n=2) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6.21 - 20.8, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (57.4 - 68.7, n=2) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41.1 - 92.8, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.4167 - 0.756, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (0.4395 - 0.452, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM -1! | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (17272 - 22536, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6544 - 26450, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (64269 - 88336, n=2) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (36464 - 103637, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (2946 - 3783, n=2) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1157 - 4484, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (76357 - 77437, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41744 - 107867, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (11040 - 12594, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4425 - 16980, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (33241 - 46842, n=2) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19153 - 55457, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18552 - 149047, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (721 - 990, n=2) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (356 - 1112, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (9159 - 12084, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3585 - 14181, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (52205 - 53205, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19472 - 54726, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
系统性能
一般系统性能没有问题，合成基准测试的整体性能也非常出色。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Lenovo Legion Go -5! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (7068 - 8082, n=2) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3592 - 8082, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (10311 - 10390, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7542 - 11262, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (9567 - 14802, n=2) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5015 - 14802, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (9317 - 9715, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3326 - 10026, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (1532 - 1596, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (840 - 1847, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (1453 - 1517, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (874 - 1719, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (1712 - 1772, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (808 - 2077, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (1291 - 1359, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (759 - 1610, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (170.3 - 325, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (205 - 288, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (229 - 231, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (107 - 291, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (517 - 756, n=2) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (428 - 931, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8082 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (92176 - 92683, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32617 - 107929, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (100379 - 101256, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25380 - 101256, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (104064 - 104172, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25595 - 117883, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (99.8 - 147.6, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (106.4 - 114, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
与英特尔版本一样，在使用实时音频应用时，Claw A8 测试设备在我们的标准化延迟测试中表现出轻微的局限性。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
* ... smaller is better
存储
AMD 机型现在可为更大的 M.2 2280 固态硬盘提供空间，如果您想安装更大的机型，这一点尤其实用。内置的美光 2500 固态硬盘（PCIe 4.0）容量为 1 TB（可用容量为 887 GB），具有极高的整体性能，即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持完全稳定。
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6999 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5380 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
475 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
482 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
66.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
170.5 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
350 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
605 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6985 (6339.8-7002.44)
图形处理器性能
Radeon 890M Radeon 890MRadeon 890M 的整体性能非常出色，不过在手动模式下还能发挥出更高的性能。在游戏方面，微星魔爪的两个版本不相上下，选择 AMD 还是英特尔版本其实并无区别。游戏性能整体也非常稳定。
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average AMD Radeon 890M | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13403 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8497 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3640 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 597 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3228 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (290 - 1026, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 890M (214 - 475, n=20) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ -1! | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (11.5 - 91.4, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (13.5 - 118.8, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (14 - 32.8, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (17.9 - 34.8, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30 - 58.8, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30.8 - 85, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (22.7 - 50.5, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M: Ø23.3 (22.7-23.8)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 150.2 | 132.9 | 73.9 | 32.7 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 129.9 | 108.5 | 87.2 | 77.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 83.3 | 44.2 | 32 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 57.1 | 47.8 | 38.2 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 176.7 | 78.5 | 65.2 | 55.4 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 44.9 | 35.6 | 30.2 | 28.7 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 44.9 | 35.8 | 28.9 | 25 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 85.1 | 76 | 57.1 | 14.9 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
与 英特尔版本在负载情况下，我们不再能检测到风扇脉动。不过，空闲时仍有约 29 分贝（A）的可听噪音。在游戏时，我们测得的噪音在 36-39 dB（A）之间，具体取决于游戏名称，这还不至于造成干扰。没有其他电子噪音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 29 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39.1 / 39.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M | Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M | GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -10% | -8% | -3% | 6% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 24.2 -1% | 22.8 5% | 25.6 -7% | 24.7 -3% | 23 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 24.2 -1% | 25.8 -8% | 25.6 -7% | 24.7 -3% | 23 4% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24 | 24.2 -1% | 25.8 -8% | 28.4 -18% | 24.7 -3% | 23 4% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 29 | 29 -0% | 31 -7% | 33.4 -15% | 28.9 -0% | 25 14% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 39.1 | 41.4 -6% | 47 -20% | 37.3 5% | 37 5% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 36.6 | 43.4 -19% | 43.3 -18% | 37.6 -3% | 41.4 -13% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 39.1 | 43.4 -11% | 45.1 -15% | 38.9 1% | 41.4 -6% | 37 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 46 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度始终保持在绝对无害的水平，特别是手柄始终保持非常凉爽。在压力测试中，处理器迅速稳定在 20 瓦。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 37.8 °C / 100 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 37.2 °C / 99 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103.1 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 31.7 °C / 89.1 F (-7.8 °C / -14 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 37.8 °C / 100 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 37.2 °C / 99 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103.1 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 31.7 °C / 89.1 F (-7.8 °C / -14 F).
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M | Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M | GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | 12% | -17% | 11% | ||
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 39.2 | 40.8 -4% | 33.8 14% | 50 -28% | 36.6 7% | |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 37 | 40.8 -10% | 35.2 5% | 50 -35% | 34.8 6% | |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 30 | 29.9 -0% | 26.6 11% | 33 -10% | 27.5 8% | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 34.9 | 30.6 12% | 28.6 18% | 33 5% | 27.2 22% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Xbox Ally X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 17%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
在空闲模式下，AMD 版本所需的电量略高于英特尔型号，因此 Lunar Lake 在这方面更具优势。不过，在游戏时的 AI 模式下，AMD 版要经济一些。我们测得的最大功耗为 64 瓦，很快就降到了 49 瓦左右，因此 65 瓦的电源整体尺寸足够大。不过，2.4 瓦的待机功耗显然过高。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.62 / 2.4 Watt |
| Idle | 5.3 / 8.7 / 9.1 Watt |
| Load |
42.2 / 64 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M, Samsung MZVMA1T0HCLD, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, Phison PS5021-E21 512GB, OLED, 1920x1080, 7" | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Average AMD Radeon 890M | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -6% | -13% | -29% | 7% | -47% | -16% | -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.3 | 3.7 30% | 6 -13% | 7.3 -38% | 3.2 40% | 11.5 -117% | 5.78 ? -9% | 6.01 ? -13% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8.7 | 6.1 30% | 8.8 -1% | 8.3 5% | 6.3 28% | 12 -38% | 8 ? 8% | 8.26 ? 5% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 9.1 | 6.2 32% | 9.2 -1% | 12.1 -33% | 6.6 27% | 17.4 -91% | 9.55 ? -5% | 10.3 ? -13% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 42.2 | 56.1 -33% | 53.1 -26% | 40.6 4% | 45 -7% | 64.5 ? -53% | 41.8 ? 1% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 35.5 | 54.5 -54% | 50.1 -41% | 51.2 -44% | 47 -32% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 37.6 | 55 -46% | 45.7 -22% | 50.2 -34% | 46.7 -24% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 64 | 66.4 -4% | 56.4 12% | 59.3 7% | 54 16% | 78.6 ? -23% | 54.7 ? 15% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 42.6 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø51.2 (47.9-64)
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.72 (6.13-8.03)
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø35.5 (35.1-36.4)
带外部监视器时的耗电量
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø49.4 (45.3-63.9)
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø63.9 (63.8-64)
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (27.6-47)
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø63.9 (63.6-63.9)
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø40.1 (37.3-60.3)
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.47 (8.82-11.7)
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø37.6 (37.2-39.7)
电池寿命
电池容量保持不变，仍为 80 Wh，运行时间也非常出色。根据 TDP 设置的不同，游戏时间可达到 1.5 至 3 小时，运行时间更长，尤其是模拟复古游戏。在 150 cd/m² 的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得在全亮度下的运行时间约为 18.5 小时和 12 小时。这些数值都不错，但 英特尔版本则更加出色。
| Battery Runtime | |
| WiFi Websurfing | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5.43 - 23.6, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Lenovo Legion Go | |
| WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6.63 - 16.6, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | |
| MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.85 - 2.78, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM
- 12/13/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.1%  | MSI Claw A8 BZ2EM AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $19.99 Hzycwgone Case for MSI Claw ... 2. $19.99 CDCHGAM Protective Case for ... 3. $18.99 JYGamhanbil Protective Case ... List Price: 999€ | 765 g | 24 mm | 8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI IPS |
2. 85.9%  | Asus ROG Xbox Ally X AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $33.24 JSAUX Docking Station for RO... 2. $9.99 amFilm 3 Pack Screen Protect... 3. $6.99 TQLGY 2 Pack Tempered Glass ... List Price: 899€ | 718 g | 50.9 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI IPS |
3. 80.2%  | GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 1400 USD | 777 g | 22.2 mm | 8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI IPS |
4. 79.3%  | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $12.98 Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 2. $25.99 PowerHOOD 65W USB-C AC/DC Ad... 3. $14.98 Puccy 2 Pack Anti Blue Light... | 692 g | 35 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI OLED |
5. 84.7%  | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $9.99 TQLGY 2 Pack Tempered Glass ... 2. $17.99 CDCHGAM Protector Cover Case... 3. $18.99 Spigen Tempered Glass Screen... List Price: 999€ | 793 g | 30 mm | 8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI IPS |
6. 66.3%  | Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 800€ | 845 g | 41 mm | 8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
