
Minisforum AI X1 Pro 与 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 评测:用于办公、游戏和人工智能的迷你 PC 升级,内存是否存在瓶颈?
新 SoC 等于更大功率?
Minisforum 对 AI X1 Pro 进行了更新,现在又为这款小巧的动力装置配备了 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470,带来了更强大的 APU,承诺提供更多储备,尤其是针对要求苛刻的工作负载和 AI 应用。但这款新处理器在实际应用中能否满足人们的高期望值呢?Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论功能强大,但配置不够理想
Minisforum AI X1 Pro 配备 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470,是一款功能强大的小型 PC。结合 32 GB 内存、高速固态硬盘和各种接口,该系统甚至可以轻松处理要求非常苛刻的工作负载。高品质的做工和扎实的选材彰显了该设备的高端品质。不过,最大的诟病还是内存:虽然 32 GB 内存在纸面上看起来很宽裕,但由于只使用了一个 SO-DIMM 模块,内存带宽受到了很大限制。我们的测试表明,这种单通道配置明显拖慢了许多应用程序的运行速度。Minisforum 在这里偷工减料的做法是错误的,即使原则上可以进行后期升级。
一个特别积极的特点是出色的冷却协调:即使在长时间高负荷运行的情况下,外壳和 SoC 仍能保持在非临界温度值。同时,冷却系统工作效率高,噪音低,即使在负载情况下也不会影响 Mini-PC 的正常运行。
通过优化内存配置,配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 的 Minisforum AI X1 Pro 充分释放了其潜能,作为一款功能强大的紧凑型迷你 PC 给人留下了深刻印象。高 CPU 和 iGPU 性能、现代 AI 加速和广泛的连接性相结合,使其在处理生产性工作负载和游戏时同样具有吸引力,甚至在需要时还可通过 eGPU 提供额外的动力储备。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Minisforum 希望通过新的 SoC 在 AI X1 Pro 的良好效果基础上再接再厉。AMD Ryzen AI 9 470 HX 为此提供了良好的基础,但正如我们的测试所显示的,仅有新的 SoC 还不足以提供更高的性能。在 32 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘的配合下,我们对这款售价1399 欧元的全新商务全能型产品的性能进行了仔细的测试。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳与连接
配备 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 的 Minisforum AI X1 Pro 的外壳和功能与配备 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 的 Minisforum AI X1 Pro 完全相同。唯一不同的是我们测试设备的处理器和内存配置。有关详细信息,请参阅 Minisforum AI X1 Pro-HX 370 的测试。.
| Connectivity - USB 3.x / USB4 / TB - AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Average of class Mini PC (423 - 3906, n=39, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (15.1 - 214, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (20.8 - 250, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Wi-Fi 性能
配件
维护
Minisforum AI X1 Pro-HX470 的维护相对简单:拧松几颗螺丝后,就可以拆下底部。不过,要访问内存和固态硬盘,必须拆下组合式电源和扬声器装置--由于电缆较短,此处必须小心。可以更换或扩展内存、无线局域网模块和固态硬盘。
可持续性
Minisforum 并没有完全忽视可持续发展问题:与 AI X1 Pro-HX370 相比,HX470 型号采用了更简单、更环保的纸板包装。不过,制造商并未提供有关生产或认证的更多细节。
测试条件
所有基准测试均在出厂设置下进行。Minisforum 允许在 BIOS 中调整 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 的性能配置文件,但测试是在出厂设置的 "自动 "设置下进行的。
处理器
...? AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470的整体性能非常高,但在我们的测试中,它无法与 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370在我们的测试中,它无法与 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 相提并论。造成这种情况的原因可能在于处理器通常的性能差异,但内存配置也起着决定性作用--这将在下面的测试部分中说明。然而,由于只安装了一个内存模块,Minisforum 的节能效果并不理想,这在纯 CPU 基准测试中已经很容易看出。AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 的短期功耗上限为 65 瓦,持续功耗上限为 54 瓦,其运行性能与 Minisforum 的前代机型 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 相同。
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Average of class Mini PC | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (974 - 82725, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (6115 - 227429, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (385 - 9475, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (20501 - 184747, n=104, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (1019 - 31931, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (3322 - 121827, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (9214 - 325960, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (127.2 - 2431, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (537 - 43587, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (8069 - 94259, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (2829 - 7885, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
Minisforum AI X1 Pro 基本上配备了强大的 APU,但由于内存配置的原因,它只能在有限的范围内发挥全部潜力。这主要体现在内存基准测试中,我们的测试样本在这方面明显落后。从结果中可以看出,在所有基准测试中,性能略低的情况都很明显。
WebXPRT 4: Overall
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (15933 - 163031, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (14143 - 123769, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (10630 - 216693, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Mini PC (47.1 - 184.8, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v6.92.6600) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
* ... smaller is better
| UL Procyon for Windows / Overall Score Integer NPU | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| UL Procyon for Windows / Overall Score Integer GPU | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形卡和游戏性能
Minisforum AI X1 Pro 的 iGPU,即 AMD Radeon 890M是继 Radeon 780M.凭借更多的计算单元和更高的时钟频率,它的性能有了明显的提升。但在我们的测试中,由于采用了单通道 RAM 配置,其优势比可能的要小。即使是较老的 iGPU,其性能也比 Minisforum 的测试样本高。如果扩展内存,iGPU 的性能可能会更高。
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
SPECworkstation 4.0: Graphics Score | Accelerator Score | Viewport Graphics | HandBrake | ONNX Inference
| Performance rating | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / Graphics Score | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / Accelerator Score | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / Viewport Graphics | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / HandBrake | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / ONNX Inference | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470, AMD Radeon 890M Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 | Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T Ultra 9 285H | GMK NucBox M7 Ultra, AMD Radeon 680M R7 PRO 6850U | GMK EVO-T1, Intel Arc Graphics 140T Ultra 9 285H | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECviewperf 2020 | 42% | 61% | -12% | 13% | -25% | 132% | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) (fps) | 23.9 | 15.2 -36% | 26.1 9% | 7.08 -70% | 11.9 -50% | 7.02 -71% | 20 ? -16% |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) (fps) | 14 | 15.5 11% | 18 29% | 7.94 -43% | 7.66 -45% | 7.4 -47% | 30.9 ? 121% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) (fps) | 21.4 | 34.1 59% | 36.2 69% | 26.7 25% | 29.8 39% | 19.9 -7% | 46.5 ? 117% |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) (fps) | 16.2 | 23.1 43% | 26 60% | 14.6 -10% | 20.2 25% | 12.8 -21% | 31.9 ? 97% |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) (fps) | 13.4 | 21.9 63% | 25.2 88% | 17.8 33% | 17.2 28% | 14.6 9% | 49.4 ? 269% |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) (fps) | 39.2 | 68.7 75% | 70.6 80% | 6.81 -83% | 59.3 51% | 6.13 -84% | 49 ? 25% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) (fps) | 31.3 | 55.9 79% | 59.3 89% | 51.3 64% | 45.1 44% | 44.9 43% | 127.7 ? 308% |
| 3DMark 05 Standard | 51961 points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 31279 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 27238 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8720 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 139502 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27248 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4800 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2608 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2203 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 367 points | |
Help | ||
| GTA V | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
30 分钟赛博朋克 2077》帧数表(1920 x 1080,超预设,FSR 关闭)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 126.4 | 115 | 36.6 | 14.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 91.4 | 56.9 | 28.9 | 19.4 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 157.1 | 104 | 60.7 | 54.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 46.4 | 23.7 | 17.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 70.8 | 50.2 | 41.9 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 26.8 | 20.4 | 16.9 | 16.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 27.1 | 22.5 | 17.2 | 15.6 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 48.4 | 43.9 | 34.4 | 9.51 |
通过 OCuLink 使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 检查 Minisforum AI X1 Pro 性能
借助 OCuLink,Minisforum AI X1 Pro 可以使用外置显卡进行扩展。高带宽明显提高了图形性能,尤其是 3D 应用程序和当前游戏。
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Unigine Superposition | |
| 1280x720 720p Low | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p High | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
| Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| ComputeMark v2.1 | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Score | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SM | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 2560x1440 High Quality | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 3840x2160 High Quality | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 | AI X1 Pro, HX 470, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 | Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | NucBox M7 Ultra, (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) R7 PRO 6850U | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECviewperf 2020 | 644% | 558% | 705% | 615% | 132% | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) (fps) | 23.9 | 42.5 78% | 41.5 74% | 43 80% | 42.7 79% | 20 ? -16% |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) (fps) | 14 | 92.9 564% | 136 871% | 139 893% | 92.2 559% | 30.9 ? 121% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) (fps) | 21.4 | 118 451% | 111 419% | 117 447% | 96.2 350% | 46.5 ? 117% |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) (fps) | 16.2 | 84.8 423% | 84.6 422% | 85.1 425% | 79.3 390% | 31.9 ? 97% |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) (fps) | 13.4 | 209 1460% | 145 982% | 209 1460% | 203 1415% | 49.4 ? 269% |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) (fps) | 39.2 | 39.9 2% | 33.5 -15% | 38.2 -3% | 36.8 -6% | 49 ? 25% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) (fps) | 31.3 | 510 1529% | 392 1152% | 542 1632% | 506 1517% | 127.7 ? 308% |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 427 | 405 | 390 | 267 | 239 | 261 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 175.2 | 154.2 | 146.3 | 136.4 | 135.4 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 183.1 | 168.9 | 145.2 | 146.9 | 133.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 93.2 | 91.1 | 73.7 | 69.7 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 172.9 | 161.5 | 156.9 | 161.7 | 153.6 | 129.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 127.1 | 127.8 | 121.3 | 111.1 | 112.1 | 74.5 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 187.9 | 201 | 206 | 120.9 | 124 | 89.2 |
排放量
系统噪音
Minisforum AI X1 Pro 采用双风扇散热设计,其中一个风扇专门冷却内存模块。来自 SoC 的废热通过热管设计进行散热。在空闲模式下,微型电脑工作时几乎听不到任何声音,但也不会完全静音。在负载情况下,声压级升至 39.2 dB(A),明显低于我们比较过的许多其他迷你电脑。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 28.4 / 28.6 / 28.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33.1 / 39.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M | Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | GMK NucBox M7 Ultra R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M | GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -19% | -24% | -13% | -34% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.9 | 23.8 4% | 24.8 -0% | 24.3 2% | 24.8 -0% | 24.7 1% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 28.4 | 28 1% | 25.4 11% | 33.7 -19% | 31.9 -12% | 38.7 -36% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 28.6 | 28.1 2% | 25.4 11% | 33.7 -18% | 31.9 -12% | 38.8 -36% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 28.6 | 28.2 1% | 25.5 11% | 33.8 -18% | 31.9 -12% | 38.9 -36% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 33.1 | 38.4 -16% | 49.8 -50% | 47.6 -44% | 41.7 -26% | 51.6 -56% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 32.3 | 49.7 -54% | 37.8 -17% | 38.7 -20% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 32.7 | 38.5 -18% | 49.6 -52% | 47.7 -46% | 39.1 -20% | 52 -59% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 39.2 | 41.8 -7% | 49.8 -27% | 47.9 -22% | 40.8 -4% | 51.6 -32% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 20.6 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 36.3 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.
发言人
在音效方面,Minisforum AI X1 Pro 的表现令人惊喜:两个集成扬声器可提供清晰的高音和均衡的中音,而低频则因设计而保持克制。总体而言,作为一款微型电脑,它的回放质量还是比较稳定的,而且在垂直安装时,主观上还能获得更多的空间感--这也是整个套件的和谐之处。
Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 26% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 26% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple Mac Mini M4 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, Radeon 890M | Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | GMK NucBox M7 Ultra R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M | GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | Average AMD Radeon 890M | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -23% | 4% | 16% | -50% | -18% | -1% | -42% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.5 | 8.6 -56% | 2.4 56% | 3.8 31% | 12.5 -127% | 6.1 -11% | 5.71 ? -4% | 9.16 ? -67% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.7 | 9.4 -22% | 4.6 40% | 5.2 32% | 14.4 -87% | 7.9 -3% | 7.95 ? -3% | 11.3 ? -47% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 9.1 | 10 -10% | 9.2 -1% | 8.4 8% | 15.2 -67% | 13.2 -45% | 9.49 ? -4% | 14.8 ? -63% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 59.2 | 70.2 -19% | 78.4 -32% | 50.1 15% | 66.6 -12% | 60.7 -3% | 63.3 ? -7% | 65.2 ? -10% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 57.4 | 70.7 -23% | 77.8 -36% | 51.6 10% | 69.9 -22% | 67.4 -17% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 92.4 | 97.7 -6% | 95.1 -3% | 91.9 1% | 75.5 18% | 117.1 -27% | 78.2 ? 15% | 112.2 ? -21% |
* ... smaller is better
功率效率
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Power Consumption | |
| Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Efficiency | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra | |
耗电量 - 外部监视器
耗电量 - 外部监视器
笔记本检查评级
Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470
- 03/02/2026 v8
Sebastian Bade
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Dimensions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 470 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1399€ | 1.3 kg | 195 x 195 x 42.5 mm | |
| Minisforum AI X1 Pro, HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 1.4 kg | 195 x 195 x 42.5 mm | ||
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 999€ | 709 g | 132 x 135 x 46.9 mm | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 1099€ | 595 g | 112 x 117 x 49.2 mm | |
| GMK NucBox M7 Ultra AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 469€ | 637 g | 125 x 132 x 58 mm | |
| GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 999€ | 946 g | 151 x 154 x 73.6 mm |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.















































































