结论 - 华硕 ROG Xbox Ally X 更快、更舒适、更易操作
新版 ROG Xbox Ally X 几乎在所有方面都进行了升级。尽管设计初看很不寻常，机身也比以前更笨重，但新的控制器手柄却更加舒适，你可以轻松地玩上几个小时。如果你玩过一次新版本，就很难再回到传统的掌机设计了。AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme 与快速的 Radeon 890M 相比，游戏性能比之前的 Ally X 提升了 10-15%，因此你能获得更多的空间，尤其是在性能模式下。后者将性能、电池续航时间（超过三小时的游戏时间）和静音风扇很好地结合在了一起。
软件也给人留下了良好的印象。迄今为止，在手持设备的小屏幕上设置 Windows 是一种痛苦的体验。有了全新的 Xbox 全屏体验，你现在可以专注于游戏，并将第三方启动器（Steam、EA、育碧等）纳入其中。在理想情况下，您将永远不必使用传统的桌面模式。不过，我们并未确定新掌上模式的性能优势。
显示屏再次采用我们熟悉的 7 英寸 IPS 模式，具有 120 Hz 和 VRR 功能，对于游戏来说确实不错。如果采用更大的面板（最好是 OLED）就更好了，但这会影响价格，很可能还会影响电池的运行时间。这些影响到底有多大，我们很快就会在评测配备 8.8 英寸 144 Hz OLED 面板的联想Legion Go 2 时见分晓。不过，它的零售价为 1,299 欧元，也要贵得多。
Pros
Cons
华硕与微软密切合作，为其最新的游戏掌机提供了更好的硬件和更好的软件体验。这就是全新的 ROG Xbox Ally X，它首次支持 Xbox 全屏体验。机箱也进行了改动，使其更加舒适。游戏性能由 AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme与 Radeon 890MiGPU 和 24GB 内存，售价 999 美元。还有一款价格更低的机型，配备 Ryzen AI Z2 和更少的内存设备，售价 599 美元（评测即将发布）。
规格
外壳 - 较笨重，但非常舒适
当新款 ROG Xbox Ally X 的第一张图片发布时，它的设计非常特别。它几乎就是一个巨大的手柄，中间有一个类似 Playstation Portal 的屏幕。由于采用了新的手柄，新款 Xbox Ally X 也比以前笨重得多，需要在背包中放置更多空间。不过，它的握持感也更加舒适，如果你回到以前的 Ally X 或其他掌上电脑，操作感会明显变差。使用 ROG Xbox Ally X 玩上几个小时不成问题，就像使用普通手柄一样。对我们来说，718 克的稍高重量不是问题，但这也取决于你已经习惯了什么。
底盘仍然由塑料制成，但质量完全没问题。我们的测试机在稳定性和制造质量方面没有任何问题。ROG Xbox Ally X 采用黑色机箱，正面有小的 ROG 徽标，但表面很光滑。背面的手柄略显粗糙，这改善了握持感。标准版 ROG Xbox Ally 采用白色底盘。
除了新的手柄外，许多功能都沿用了前代机型，包括 USB-C 端口（1 个 USB 4）、极速 microSD 读卡器以及快速 Wi-Fi 模块（Wi-Fi 6E），但不支持 Wi-Fi 7。更换 M.2-2280 固态硬盘不成问题。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (20.9 - 201, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro v60) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X (Angelbird AV Pro v60) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (74.7 - 261, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
输入设备 - 改进触发器
华硕只是稍微改动了输入设备，由于 Ally X 已经有了很好的按键和操纵杆，所以这并不是问题。除了屏幕旁边新增加的 Xbox 按钮外，霍尔效应触发器也略有改动。在我们 评测 Ally X 时的评测中，我们曾指出触发器有点过于顺滑，但新款的触发器阻力稍大。这有助于提高最初几毫米行程的精确度。
软件 - Xbox 全屏体验
除了硬件上的变化，ROG Xbox Ally X 的另一大改进是整合了 Xbox 软件。手持设备默认进入新的全屏模式，这应该是为了改善操作。用户界面实际上得到了简化，Xbox 应用程序现在支持来自其他启动器的游戏。你不必再使用桌面来安装或启动游戏了。按下新的 Xbox 按钮，就能激活熟悉的游戏栏，并在其中使用紧凑模式。Armoury Crate SE 软件现在也集成到了菜单中。如果按住 Xbox 按钮，就会启动应用程序启动器。在新的掌上模式下，您仍然可以访问设置和文件资源管理器。
从底部轻扫即可切换到经典桌面模式。您可以随时切换回去，但 Windows 会建议您重新启动以提高性能。不过，我们并未发现新的 Xbox 全屏模式有任何性能提升。
考虑到新的全屏模式，我们的评价总体上还是不错的。不过，Windows 仍无法真正与 SteamOS 的舒适性相媲美，但 Windows 的功能也更加全面。搭载 SteamOS 的手持设备还可以获得更高的硬件性能（正如我们在对联想Legion Go S 的评测中所看到的那样）。如果你喜欢华硕的 Armoury Crate SE 软件，也可以将其作为默认启动器。因此您不必被迫使用 Xbox 应用程序。我们在评测 2024 ROG Go S 时曾报道过 Armoury Crate SE 软件。 2024 ROG Ally X 的评测时，我们曾报道过 Armoury Crate SE 软件。.
显示屏 - IPS、120 赫兹和 VRR
显示屏没有变化，华硕再次使用了熟悉的 7 英寸 IPS 屏幕，分辨率为 1080p，120 Hz 和 VRR。屏幕边框仍然很宽，如果能增加一块更大的面板就更好了。整体画质不错，但没有 OLED 面板那么亮丽。不过，也没有出现 PWM 闪烁的问题，IPS 屏幕仍然是游戏中非常不错的选择。
和之前一样，面板亮度并没有达到宣传的 500 尼特（最高 490 尼特，平均约 460 尼特）。黑色值为 0.33 cd/m²，最大对比度约为 1,500:1。根据我们使用 前一个型号可以说，即使在明亮的环境中，我们也从未遇到过可视性方面的问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 490 cd/m²
Contrast: 1485:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
68.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 7381 K
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X TL070FVXS01_0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | GPD Pocket 4 YHB03P24, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8", 144 Hz | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 ZDZ0501, OLED, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | MSI Claw 8 AI+ PN8007QB1-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 8", 120 Hz | Asus ROG Ally X TL070FVXS01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 26% | 35% | 7% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 66 | 92.7 40% | 99.43 51% | 71.1 8% | 66.2 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 93.1 | 99.6 7% | 99.93 7% | 98.5 6% | 93.4 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 68.3 | 90 32% | 99.89 46% | 72.9 7% | 68.5 0% |
| Response Times | -130% | 38% | -97% | 22% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 11.4 ? | 27.9 ? -145% | 1.08 ? 91% | 23.7 ? -108% | 9.7 ? 15% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 8 ? | 17.2 ? -115% | 9.3 ? -16% | 14.9 ? -86% | 5.7 ? 29% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 120 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 10 | ||||
| Screen | -15% | 56% | -3% | -3% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 490 | 511.2 4% | 833 70% | 524 7% | 484 -1% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 459 | 524 14% | 830 81% | 514 12% | 456 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 86 | 84 -2% | 90 5% | 93 8% | 88 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.33 | 0.4 -21% | 0.064 81% | 0.33 -0% | 0.35 -6% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1485 | 1278 -14% | 13016 776% | 1588 7% | 1383 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 4.54 -62% | 6.7 -139% | 3.5 -25% | 2.9 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.5 | 8.96 -38% | 12.04 -85% | 7.3 -12% | 7.1 -9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 0.95 37% | 2.95 -97% | 1.3 13% | 1.4 7% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 6.4 -52% | 11.99 -185% | 5.9 -40% | 4.5 -7% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.213 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7381 88% | 8125 80% | 8033 81% | 7852 83% | 7534 86% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -40% /
-23% | 43% /
49% | -31% /
-15% | 6% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了分析，发现默认配置文件除了色温偏冷外，还略微偏蓝。我们通过自己的校准明显改善了图像质量，但同时也将最大亮度降低了约 55 尼特。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 11.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8169 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme
ROG Xbox Ally X 配备了 AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme、Radeon 890M iGPU 和 24 GB 高速内存（LPDDR5x-8000）。默认情况下为 GPU 分配 8 GB，但可以手动调整该值。
审查设置
华硕为新款 ROG Xbox Ally X 稍微调整了我们熟悉的电源配置文件。"涡轮增压 "模式（主电源）现在可维持 35 瓦（电池仍为 25 瓦），但这在游戏时并不会产生很大影响。我们使用 Turbo 模式（连接 PSU）进行了以下基准测试，以显示最佳性能。CPU 提升功能默认开启，但根据我们的经验，您应该对这一设置进行一些尝试。根据游戏标题的不同，影响很小，但可以节省几瓦特（例如，使用帧数限制器时），这显然可以改善电池的运行时间。
| 能源概况 | APU TDP | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | CP 2077 1080p Ultra | 最大风扇噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音 | 23/19/13 W | 8,446 点。 | 2,802 点 | 15.5 fps | 29.7 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 30/24/17 W | 11,090 分 | 3,317 分 | 23 fps | 31.3 dB(A) |
| 涡轮增压（电池） | 35/30/25 W | 13,476 分 | 3,560 分 | 26.7 fps | 37.4 dB(A) |
| 涡轮 | 55/45/35 W | 14,586 点 | 3,620 点 | 28 fps | 43.4 dB(A) |
处理器 - Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme
这款处理器是 Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme，与普通移动处理器有很大不同。旧款 Z1 Extreme 配备了八个完整的 Zen 4 内核，而 Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme 的 CPU 部分更类似于 Ryzen AI 7 350。它提供三个 Zen 5 核心（最高主频 5.0 GHz）和五个较慢的 Zen 5c 核心（最高主频 3.3 GHz），但它们与快速的 Radeon 890M 结合在一起（这本来是 Ryzen AI 9 HX370/375 的专利）。
因此，尽管功耗限制略高，但 CPU 性能与旧版 Z1 Extreme 基本相同也就不足为奇了。GPD Pocket 4 中的 Ryzen AI 9 HX370 虽然功耗较低，但速度却快了约 13%。总之，CPU 性能仍然不错，即使将 ROG Xbox Ally X 用作桌面系统（连接到带 USB-C 电源和连接输入设备的显示器），也没有任何限制。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3984 - 16841, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1088 - 2006, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1521 - 6577, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (357 - 787, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (689 - 2533, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (155.1 - 304, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (189 - 588, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19684 - 66618, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3653 - 6143, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (12072 - 12734, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4587 - 13426, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (2769 - 2790, n=2) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1348 - 2904, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3932 - 11975, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (875 - 2134, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7.07 - 20.8, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41.1 - 92.8, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.4167 - 0.756, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6990 - 26450, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (42932 - 109745, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (1403 - 4847, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (41744 - 114294, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (4425 - 16980, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (23380 - 58482, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (21547 - 166333, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (356 - 1112, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (3766 - 14181, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (19472 - 54726, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
系统性能
不出所料，一般性能印象和新的 Xbox 全屏模式也运行得非常流畅。在评测期间，我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5219 - 7471, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (8427 - 11262, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (7213 - 10031, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6350 - 10026, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (840 - 1847, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (874 - 1719, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (808 - 2077, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (759 - 1610, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (188.4 - 325, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (107 - 291, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (428 - 895, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M (n=1) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7068 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (32617 - 107929, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25380 - 100379, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (25596 - 117883, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (99.8 - 147.6, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme (n=1) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
我们的标准延迟测试（网页浏览、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）显示，在使用最新 BIOS 版本的评测机上，实时音频应用没有出现任何问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的评测机配备了一块 1 TB 的三星固态硬盘，在初始设置后，你可以使用 910 GB 来存储自己的数据。PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的整体性能不错，在持续工作负载下也很稳定。
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average Samsung MZVMA1T0HCLD | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
集成显卡是现代 Radeon 890M系统默认为 GPU 分配 8 GB 内存。这一设置（16 GB 系统/8 GB GPU）在上一代机型上已经非常有效，但如果有必要，也可以在 Armoury Crate SE 软件中调整这一设置。与配备 Radeon 780M 的旧版 Ally X 相比，GPU 在合成测试中的性能提高了 14%，无论是在主电源还是电池供电情况下都是如此。AMD iGPU 的平均性能也与英特尔的 Arc Graphics 140V 相当。
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average AMD Radeon 890M | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 46051 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14947 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8939 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3993 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3331 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 3346 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (290 - 980, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 890M (214 - 364, n=18) | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
游戏掌机的主要方面显然是游戏体验，而新款 ROG Xbox Ally X 在这方面也给人留下了良好印象。我们的游戏基准测试标准套件显示，新版 ROG Xbox Ally X 比旧版 Ally X和 微星Claw 8 AI+(英特尔 Lunar Lake）相比优势为 6%。FSR 3 或 AMD 的 "流体运动帧 "等可选功能可在 Amoury Crate 的快速设置中进行调整，因此您无需进入图形软件。
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ -1! | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (11.5 - 91.4, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (13.5 - 32.5, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (14 - 32.8, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (18.4 - 34.8, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30 - 58.8, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (30.8 - 85, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (24.5 - 50.5, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
总的来说，新机型的 "性能"模式（17W）与旧机型的 "涡轮"模式（25W）性能大致相同。性能模式也是我们的最爱，因为它在性能、电池运行时间和静音风扇之间实现了良好的平衡。根据游戏的不同，你需要对设置进行一些调整（如前所述，还需要检查 CPU 提升）。即使不能一直使用最高细节，大多数游戏还是可以玩的。
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SM | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Dota 2 Reborn | |
| 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| 1366x768 med (1/3) | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Strange Brigade | |
| 1280x720 lowest AF:1 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| 1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| X-Plane 11.11 | |
| 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 35W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Performance 17W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Turbo 25W | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Silent 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 30W | |
| ROG Ally X Performance 17W | |
| ROG Ally X Quiet 13W | |
| ROG Ally X Turbo 25W | |
游戏性能完全稳定。在接下来的几天里，我们将添加更多的游戏基准测试，包括新 XG Mobile（RTX 5090 笔记本电脑）的基准测试。
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 64.8 | 31.1 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 112.4 | 102.6 | 86.7 | 78.3 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 92.2 | 45.7 | 34.8 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.7 | 54.3 | 43 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 171.9 | 79.7 | 68 | 58.8 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 50 | 39.8 | 33.2 | 32.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 49.5 | 40.5 | 31.9 | 28 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 100 | 88 | 67 | 17.7 |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 29 | 27 | 23 | 15 |
排放 - 仅在涡轮增压模式下声音较大
系统噪音
在使用电源适配器的 "涡轮增压 "模式下，你可以清楚地听到风扇发出约 43 dB（A）的噪音，但在使用电池供电时，约 37 dB（A）的噪音会让你感觉更舒适。如果你喜欢更安静的系统，则应使用 "性能"模式，在该模式下我们只能测到 31 dB(A)。我们的评测设备没有产生任何其他电子噪音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.2 / 24.2 / 29 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41.4 / 43.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Radeon 890M, Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Samsung MZVMA1T0HCLD | GPD Pocket 4 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Phison PS5021-E21 512GB | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 | Asus ROG Ally X Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -4% | 2% | -0% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.2 | 22.8 6% | 25.6 -6% | 24.7 -2% | 24.7 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.2 | 25.8 -7% | 25.6 -6% | 24.7 -2% | 24.7 -2% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.2 | 25.8 -7% | 28.4 -17% | 24.7 -2% | 24.7 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 29 | 31 -7% | 33.4 -15% | 28.9 -0% | 28.5 2% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 41.4 | 47 -14% | 37.3 10% | 42.6 -3% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 43.4 | 43.3 -0% | 37.6 13% | 41.4 5% | 42.6 2% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 43.4 | 45.1 -4% | 38.9 10% | 41.4 5% | 42.6 2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
ROG Xbox Ally X 的表面温度是完全无害的，因为大手柄始终保持非常凉爽的温度，而且热空气会在机箱顶部散去，那里通常不会接触到手或手指。在压力测试中，系统可以轻松保持 35 瓦的 TDP。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 37.7 °C / 100 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.7 °C / 99.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 31.1 °C / 88 F (-6.6 °C / -11.9 F).
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme, AMD Radeon 890M | GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 12% | -16% | 11% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40.8 | 33.8 17% | 50 -23% | 36.6 10% | 42.7 -5% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 40.8 | 35.2 14% | 50 -23% | 34.8 15% | 39.7 3% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 29.9 | 26.6 11% | 33 -10% | 27.5 8% | 28 6% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 30.6 | 28.6 7% | 33 -8% | 27.2 11% | 27.2 11% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
机身前部的立体声扬声器给人留下了非常好的印象，尤其是在性能 模式下与静音风扇配合使用时，让你在游戏时也能享受音效。
Asus ROG Xbox Ally X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
GPD Pocket 4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 20% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
MSI Claw 8 AI+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Ally X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 电池运行时间非常长
耗电量
与旧版 Ally X 相比，空载功耗略有降低。我们测量到负载下的功耗在短时间内高达 66 瓦，但很快就降到了 55 瓦左右。因此，65 瓦的电源适配器已经足够大了。
| Off / Standby | 0.47 / 0.82 Watt |
| Idle | 3.7 / 6.1 / 6.2 Watt |
| Load |
56.1 / 66.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X Ryzen Z2 Extreme, Radeon 890M, Samsung MZVMA1T0HCLD, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | GPD Pocket 4 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, Phison PS5021-E21 512GB, OLED, 1920x1080, 7" | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 8" | Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 7" | Average AMD Radeon 890M | Average of class Handheld / UMPC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | -43% | 10% | -6% | -40% | -39% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.7 | 6 -62% | 7.3 -97% | 3.2 14% | 4.3 -16% | 6.06 ? -64% | 6.83 ? -85% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6.1 | 8.8 -44% | 8.3 -36% | 6.3 -3% | 6.7 -10% | 8.19 ? -34% | 9.09 ? -49% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 6.2 | 9.2 -48% | 12.1 -95% | 6.6 -6% | 7.5 -21% | 9.82 ? -58% | 11.9 ? -92% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 56.1 | 53.1 5% | 40.6 28% | 48.2 14% | 67.2 ? -20% | 43.5 ? 22% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 55 | 45.7 17% | 50.2 9% | 46.7 15% | 53.9 2% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 54.5 | 50.1 8% | 51.2 6% | 47 14% | 61.3 -12% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 66.4 | 56.4 15% | 59.3 11% | 66.8 -1% | 80.7 ? -22% | 59 ? 11% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部屏幕功耗
电池运行时间
80 Wh 的电池没有变化，再次提供了超长的电池运行时间。我们在 150 尼特和最大亮度下进行的 Wi-Fi 测试结果分别为 16.5 小时和 14 小时。游戏时的运行时间显然更有趣。在"涡轮增压 " 模式下，我们记录的运行时间略高于 2 小时（2:13 小时），在 "高性能 "模式下为 3:12 小时。在静音 模式下可以达到 4 小时，通过云或模拟老游戏时甚至可以达到 6-7 小时。
| Battery Runtime | |
| 1920x1080 Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (0.85 - 2.42, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| WiFi Websurfing | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (5.43 - 23.6, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| GPD Pocket 4 | |
| Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 | |
| WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness | |
| MSI Claw 8 AI+ | |
| Asus ROG Xbox Ally X | |
| Asus ROG Ally X | |
| Average of class Handheld / UMPC (6.63 - 16.6, n=5, last 2 years) | |
笔记本检查评级
Asus ROG Xbox Ally X
- 10/15/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.9%  | Asus ROG Xbox Ally X AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $14.99 CoBak 2 Pack 9H Tempered Gla... 2. $12.99 amFilm 3 Pack Screen Protect... 3. $19.99 NINKI Silicone Skin for ASUS... List Price: 899€ | 718 g | 50.9 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI IPS |
2. 80.2%  | GPD Pocket 4 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 1400 USD | 777 g | 22.2 mm | 8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI IPS |
3. 79.3%  | Zotac ZGC-G1A1W-01 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 2. $25.99 PowerHOOD 65W USB-C AC/DC Ad... 3. Puccy 2 Pack Anti Blue Light... | 692 g | 35 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI OLED |
4. 84.7%  | MSI Claw 8 AI+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,195.00 EXCaliberPC [2025] MSI Claw ... 2. $17.49 CDCHGAM Protector Cover Case... 3. $26.99 Wanaiha Hard Case for MSI Cl... List Price: 999€ | 793 g | 30 mm | 8.00" 1920x1200 283 PPI IPS |
5. 84.6%  | Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $699.97 List Price: 899€ | 685 g | 36.9 mm | 7.00" 1920x1080 315 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
