Notebookcheck

Chuwi CoreBook X Pro笔记本电脑评论。廉价的120赫兹显示器

看起来不错,但零件很便宜。 CoreBook X Pro是你能找到的拥有120赫兹面板的最便宜的15.6英寸笔记本电脑。然而,问题是你将不得不面对系统主要方面的大幅削减。
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...
Chinese Tech Coffee Lake Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

在几个月前刚刚回顾了14英寸的CoreBook X之后,Chuwi现在准备推出CoreBook X Pro,它使用相同的英特尔第八代酷睿i5-8259U处理器,但采用更大的15.6英寸外形尺寸。与14英寸机型相比,这个较大的版本在功能、显示屏和视觉设计方面是一个完全不同的野兽。

CoreBook X Pro的竞争对手包括其他预算的15.6英寸多媒体笔记本电脑,如 惠普Pavilion 15, 联想IdeaPad 3系列, 戴尔Inspiron系列, 或 Acer Aspire 3系列.Chuwi是,现在销售该模型通过其官方在线商店以559美元的价格出售。

更多关于Chuwi的评论。

Chuwi CoreBook X Pro (CoreBook Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-8259U 4 x 2.3 - 3.8 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Coffee Lake-U
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Core: 1050 MHz, Memory: 1200 MHz, DDR4, 30.0.100.9864
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR4 1200 MHz, Single-Channel, Soldered
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, CMN1521, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, 512 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 359.4 x 241.5
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.811 kg, Power Supply: 256 g
Price
559 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
74.8 %
09/2021
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655
1.8 kg17.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
77 %
09/2021
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
1.9 kg20.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.1 %
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
R7 5700U, Vega 8 R4000
1.8 kg16.1 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.3 %
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
R7 4700U, Vega 7
1.7 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.8 %
07/2020
Honor MagicBook 15
R5 3500U, Vega 8
1.5 kg16.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.8 %
07/2020
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630
1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1200

案例 - 看起来不错,感觉很糟

Chuwi笔记本电脑一直看起来很有吸引力,特别是在价格方面,CoreBook X Pro延续了这种趋势。制造商甚至推出了新的机箱设计,与Apple ,与旧的Chuwi型号的外观相比,在视觉上更加独特。不幸的是,机箱的刚性并没有真正改善,因为系统的吱吱作响和弯曲比我们希望的更多,当扭曲它的角落。它当然不会像它看起来那么坚固。

由于CoreBook X Pro厚厚的底边框,整体尺寸比大多数其他15.6英寸笔记本电脑略大且重。该系统的重量大约与 XPS 15 9500尽管Chuwi的体积更大。

沿着前部和侧边的红色装饰为原本灰色的底盘增加了视觉亮点。
沿着前部和侧边的红色装饰为原本灰色的底盘增加了视觉亮点。
外盖和键盘板为光滑的铝合金材质
外盖和键盘板为光滑的铝合金材质
盖子打开到最大(~140度)。
盖子打开到最大(~140度)。
底板和侧面是塑料的
底板和侧面是塑料的
铰链打开到更大的角度时,会明显变弱。
铰链打开到更大的角度时,会明显变弱。
这款笔记本上的通风格栅比其他大多数配备15W至28W CPU的超极本更多
这款笔记本上的通风格栅比其他大多数配备15W至28W CPU的超极本更多
374 mm 243 mm 20.5 mm 1.9 kg360 mm 239 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg359.4 mm 241.5 mm 17.9 mm 1.8 kg359.8 mm 233.8 mm 16.1 mm 1.8 kg357.8 mm 229.9 mm 16.9 mm 1.5 kg344.72 mm 230.14 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg

连接性 - 没有电源传输或显示端口

对于一台15.6英寸的多媒体笔记本电脑来说,端口选项还算不错,有大量的USB端口,甚至还有千兆以太网。不幸的是,USB-C端口不支持DisplayPort或Power Delivery,这意味着用户必须使用HDMI为任何外部显示器和专有的桶形充电器充电。

前面。没有端口
前面。没有端口
右边。USB-A 2.0,SD读卡器,千兆RJ-45,Kensington锁
右边。USB-A 2.0,SD读卡器,千兆RJ-45,Kensington锁
后方。没有端口
后方。没有端口
左边:AC适配器,全尺寸HDMI,2个USB-A 3.0,USB-C(无DP或PD),3.5毫米音频插孔,摄像头杀毒开关
左边:AC适配器,全尺寸HDMI,2个USB-A 3.0,USB-C(无DP或PD),3.5毫米音频插孔,摄像头杀毒开关

SD卡阅读器

从我们的UHS-II SD卡向桌面传输1GB照片的速度很慢,约为55秒,而在戴尔XPS 15上仅为6或7秒。

完全插入的SD卡突出了一半以上的长度
完全插入的SD卡突出了一半以上的长度
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204.4 MB/s ∼100% +976%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
  (AV Pro V60)
78.3 MB/s ∼38% +312%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
35 MB/s ∼17% +84%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
  (AV Pro v60)
20.7 MB/s ∼10% +9%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
  (AV Pro V60)
19 MB/s ∼9%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
199.2 MB/s ∼100% +666%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
  (AV Pro V60)
84.5 MB/s ∼42% +225%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
36.9 MB/s ∼19% +42%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
  (AV Pro v60)
28.2 MB/s ∼14% +8%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
  (AV Pro V60)
26 MB/s ∼13%

沟通

对于集成的1x1英特尔3165模块,无线性能低于平均水平。虽然对于浏览和流媒体来说已经足够好了,但传输率可以更稳定,如下图所示,当与我们的Netgear RAX200测试路由器配对时。

不可拆卸的WLAN模块
不可拆卸的WLAN模块
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1221 (968min - 1401max) MBit/s ∼100% +341%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1138 (844min - 1286max) MBit/s ∼93% +311%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1049 (253min - 1334max) MBit/s ∼86% +279%
Honor MagicBook 15
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
616 (559min - 687max) MBit/s ∼50% +122%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
277 (230min - 326max) MBit/s ∼23%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
262 (240min - 277max) MBit/s ∼21% -5%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1281 (1079min - 1478max) MBit/s ∼100% +835%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1276 (1239min - 1312max) MBit/s ∼100% +831%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1083 (972min - 1227max) MBit/s ∼85% +691%
Honor MagicBook 15
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
613 (577min - 630max) MBit/s ∼48% +347%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
238 (207min - 270max) MBit/s ∼19% +74%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
137 (60min - 194max) MBit/s ∼11%
050100150200250300689714616418912416792186140182182194108937860651337080143192104172191175156146132689714616418912416792186140182182194108937860651337080143192104172191175156146132275276263273265295285279283273262280276283281230326259275287283282282280278282268267286265Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø134 (60-194)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø277 (230-326)

网络摄像头

即使以笔记本电脑网络摄像头已经很低的标准来看,摄像头质量也很差。色温太暖,颜色很不协调,尽管我们的环境照明很亮,但整体画面很浑浊。

ColorChecker
21 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
29 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Chuwi CoreBook X Pro: 21.76 ∆E min: 0.59 - max: 30.83 ∆E

维护

只需一把飞利浦螺丝刀和锋利的边缘,就可以很容易地拆除底部面板。用户可以直接访问2个M.2托架和一个SODIMM插槽进行扩展。

配件和保修

除了文件和交流电适配器外,盒子里没有其他东西。制造商提供一年的有限保修,但由于运输问题,海外买家可能很难要求保修。

输入设备 - 笨重的按键和点击板

键盘

虽然超极本的键盘通常很浅,但CoreBook X Pro的按键既浅又软,打字体验不尽人意。特别是回车键和空格键太过松软,而我们的测试装置上的Windows键有时甚至无法记录按下的动作。

触摸板

点击板要比 微软Surface Laptop 3(12.5 x 7.8 cm vs. 11.5 x 7.6 cm)。常规的光标控制是可靠的,由于显示器的120赫兹刷新率,特别流畅。然而,多点触控的拖放动作并不那么可靠,因为光标有时可能会跳动。当以较慢的速度滑行时,点击板的表面也有点过于粘稠,这影响了精确的点击。

当背光灯激活时,所有的按键和符号都会被照亮
当背光灯激活时,所有的按键和符号都会被照亮
集成式点击板的按键很浅,而且有令人满意的响亮的咔哒声
集成式点击板的按键很浅,而且有令人满意的响亮的咔哒声
钥匙反馈很弱,行程很浅
钥匙反馈很弱,行程很浅
数字键盘和方向键比主要的QWERTY键更窄、更拥挤。
数字键盘和方向键比主要的QWERTY键更窄、更拥挤。

显示 - 120赫兹不是免费的

CoreBook X Pro使用的是奇美N156HRA-EA1 IPS面板,与华硕TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM的面板相同。 华硕TUF游戏F15 FX506HMAcer Nitro 5 AN515-55游戏笔记本电脑。这块特殊的面板提供了120赫兹的原生刷新率,同时为更流畅的游戏提供了相当快的响应时间。然而,颜色和亮度是有限的,因为这在技术上是一台预算笔记本电脑。更高端的面板,如那些发现在 雷蛇刀片15能够为游戏和数字编辑提供更快的响应时间、更快的刷新率和更深的色彩。

底部边框较厚,没有边缘到边缘的玻璃保护
底部边框较厚,没有边缘到边缘的玻璃保护
狭窄的侧边框
狭窄的侧边框
哑光覆盖只是比亮光的替代品稍有颗粒感。
哑光覆盖只是比亮光的替代品稍有颗粒感。
沿着右侧边缘有轻微的不均匀背光渗出
沿着右侧边缘有轻微的不均匀背光渗出
253.8
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
250.4
cd/m²
250.8
cd/m²
269.7
cd/m²
251.5
cd/m²
235.2
cd/m²
268.2
cd/m²
240.2
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 269.7 cd/m² Average: 253.1 cd/m² Minimum: 27.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 269.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1349:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.61
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
43.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
N156HCA-EN1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Chi Mei N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
N156HCA-EA1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Honor MagicBook 15
AU Optronics B156HAN02.8, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Sharp LQ156N1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1200
Display
56%
4%
52%
-5%
79%
Display P3 Coverage
41.9
65.6
57%
43.6
4%
65.93
57%
39.96
-5%
81.53
95%
sRGB Coverage
62.9
98.1
56%
65.2
4%
91.95
46%
59.68
-5%
100
59%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
43.4
67.8
56%
45
4%
66.71
54%
41.29
-5%
79.64
84%
Response Times
-22%
30%
-32%
-12%
-30%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31.2 ?(17.2, 14)
39.6 ?(20.4, 19.2)
-27%
18 ?(8, 10)
42%
42 ?(23.2, 18.8)
-35%
36 ?(18, 18)
-15%
42 ?(20, 22)
-35%
Response Time Black / White *
23.2 ?(12.4, 10.8)
26.8 ?(16, 10.8)
-16%
19 ?(10, 9)
18%
29.6 ?(16, 13.6)
-28%
25 ?(14, 11)
-8%
28.8 ?(15.2, 13.6)
-24%
PWM Frequency
25510 ?(30)
Screen
20%
-22%
-7%
-9%
17%
Brightness middle
269.7
293
9%
289
7%
351
30%
251
-7%
592
120%
Brightness
253
266
5%
267
6%
337
33%
247
-2%
565
123%
Brightness Distribution
87
84
-3%
85
-2%
91
5%
85
-2%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.2
0.21
-5%
0.56
-180%
0.29
-45%
0.205
-3%
0.46
-130%
Contrast
1349
1395
3%
516
-62%
1210
-10%
1224
-9%
1287
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.9
2.1
46%
3.96
-2%
4.5
-15%
3.94
-1%
3.19
18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
15.77
5
68%
6.76
57%
9.4
40%
7.87
50%
5.45
65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.61
0.7
57%
1.9
-18%
3.42
-112%
2.03
-26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
3.5
-0%
3.43
2%
6.3
-80%
3.42
2%
3.9
-11%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.21 100%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.44 90%
2.25 98%
CCT
7045 92%
6681 97%
7191 90%
6601 98%
6319 103%
6522 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
42
59.7
38
71.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
65
91.8
59
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
18% / 22%
4% / -8%
4% / 2%
-9% / -9%
22% / 24%

* ... smaller is better

色彩空间狭窄,仅为sRGB的63%,表明面板不适合数字编辑。这是少数同时具有120赫兹高刷新率和有限色域的显示器之一,因为高刷新率通常会带来高(>90%)的sRGB覆盖率。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3

X-Rite色度计的测量结果显示,7045K的色温与6500K的sRGB目标相比,略显过冷。一旦我们校准了显示器,灰度和颜色就会有明显的改善。由于面板的色彩空间有限,颜色在高饱和度水平上仍然变得更加不准确。

校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的ColorChecker
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17025 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

户外能见度最好是在阴暗处,因为任何更亮的东西都会冲淡颜色和文字。这并不是说显示屏很暗淡,因为它对室内条件来说足够明亮,但像XPS 15这样价格较高的替代品可以有两倍的亮度,在户外的能见度明显提高。

阳光下的室外
阳光下的室外
在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
阳光下的室外
阳光下的室外
宽广的IPS可视角度。对比度和色彩在极端广角下会下降
宽广的IPS可视角度。对比度和色彩在极端广角下会下降

性能 - 28 W TDP酷睿i7-8259U回报

处理器

28W的 酷睿i5-8259U尽管是几年前的产品,但与较新的型号相比,它的性能良好。多线程性能超过了较新的第十代 酷睿i3-1035G1i7-1065G7而在单线程性能方面则落后10%至15%。

性能的可持续性非常好,在CPU利用率达到100%的情况下,长时间内没有明显的下降。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630636.38631.9629.36627.27629.12632.21628.43630.6629.49629.39627.87628.79630.73631.16629.07630.29626.6630.12631628.17627.84628.18631.08628.71628.45630.03628.1629.54627.02626.57629.77628.86629.36631.51628.89631.56627.6630.92629.54627.8629.23629.12629.42627.98627.84627.74624.68630.22627.6629.53639.84546.09517.42517.16522.75522.09520.62521.37521.36522.38521.32522.72516.98494.21520.41519.86521.87518.5520.55521.53520.72523.37522.2521.15522.15488.76486.16486.9482.86484.24484.32485.05486.35487.27485.05486.35486.35486.99485.43483.5485.15487.55482.58486.64487.92487.08485.79484.6485.8484.87486.36485.14487.45485.61486.25487.27487.82488.03485.43486.81487.64487.73486.71486.99486.36486.16483.78486.81486.44485.79485.7486.35485.79488.11486.16574.25572.07571.18573.62572.33573.1568.65575.29573.23571.56572.84570.17573.1572.33571.69567.76571.83572.84570.55573.35569.14571.31572.46569.78570.04572.58569.36574.13572.71572.84573.23572.97572.89575.29575.28574.77572.58574.25573.61572.58570.84568.38565.38569.66567.13567.01572.46559.33568.3567.01636.38631.9629.36627.27629.12632.21628.43630.6629.49629.39627.87628.79630.73631.16629.07630.29626.6630.12631628.17627.84628.18631.08628.71628.45630.03628.1629.54627.02626.57629.77628.86629.36631.51628.89631.56627.6630.92629.54627.8629.23629.12629.42627.98627.84627.74624.68630.22627.6629.53639.84546.09517.42517.16522.75522.09520.62521.37521.36522.38521.32522.72516.98494.21520.41519.86521.87518.5520.55521.53520.72523.37522.2521.15522.15488.76486.16486.9482.86484.24484.32485.05486.35487.27485.05486.35486.35486.99485.43483.5485.15487.55482.58486.64487.92487.08485.79484.6485.8484.87486.36485.14487.45485.61486.25487.27487.82488.03485.43486.81487.64487.73486.71486.99486.36486.16483.78486.81486.44485.79485.7486.35485.79488.11486.16574.25572.07571.18573.62572.33573.1568.65575.29573.23571.56572.84570.17573.1572.33571.69567.76571.83572.84570.55573.35569.14571.31572.46569.78570.04572.58569.36574.13572.71572.84573.23572.97572.89575.29575.28574.77572.58574.25573.61572.58570.84568.38565.38569.66567.13567.01572.46559.33568.3567.01636.38631.9629.36627.27629.12632.21628.43630.6629.49629.39627.87628.79630.73631.16629.07630.29626.6630.12631628.17627.84628.18631.08628.71628.45630.03628.1629.54627.02626.57629.77628.86629.36631.51628.89631.56627.6630.92629.54627.8629.23629.12629.42627.98627.84627.74624.68630.22627.6629.53639.84546.09517.42517.16522.75522.09520.62521.37521.36522.38521.32522.72516.98494.21520.41519.86521.87518.5520.55521.53520.72523.37522.2521.15522.15488.76486.16486.9482.86484.24484.32485.05486.35487.27485.05486.35486.35486.99485.43483.5485.15487.55482.58486.64487.92487.08485.79484.6485.8484.87486.36485.14487.45485.61486.25487.27487.82488.03485.43486.81487.64487.73486.71486.99486.36486.16483.78486.81486.44485.79485.7486.35485.79488.11486.16574.25572.07571.18573.62572.33573.1568.65575.29573.23571.56572.84570.17573.1572.33571.69567.76571.83572.84570.55573.35569.14571.31572.46569.78570.04572.58569.36574.13572.71572.84573.23572.97572.89575.29575.28574.77572.58574.25573.61572.58570.84568.38565.38569.66567.13567.01572.46559.33568.3567.01Tooltip
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø629 (624.68-636.38)
HP 15s-fq1440ng Intel Core i7-1065G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø526 (494.21-639.84)
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl Intel Core i7-8565U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø486 (482.58-488.76)
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø571 (559.33-575.29)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
2870 Points ∼100% +90%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
2347 Points ∼82% +55%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1908 Points ∼66% +26%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1855 Points ∼65% +23%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
1512 Points ∼53%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (1385 - 1512, n=3)
1443 Points ∼50% -5%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1360 Points ∼47% -10%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1311 Points ∼46% -13%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
1283 Points ∼45% -15%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
1110 Points ∼39% -27%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
575 Points ∼100% +51%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
518 Points ∼90% +36%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
478 Points ∼83% +25%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
446 Points ∼78% +17%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
439 Points ∼76% +15%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
428 Points ∼74% +12%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
405 Points ∼70% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (381 - 386, n=3)
383 Points ∼67% +1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
381 Points ∼66%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
355 Points ∼62% -7%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
7378 Points ∼100% +88%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4947 (4868.64min - 4947.48max) Points ∼67% +26%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4204 Points ∼57% +7%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
3917 (3844.79min - 3916.64max) Points ∼53%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (3592 - 3917, n=3)
3746 Points ∼51% -4%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1495 Points ∼100% +53%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1362 Points ∼91% +39%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1224 Points ∼82% +25%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (973 - 991, n=3)
981 Points ∼66% 0%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
980 Points ∼66%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1173 (1033.3min - 1172.68max) Points ∼100% +84%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
934 (873.29min - 934.25max) Points ∼80% +47%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
762 (618.81min - 762.14max) Points ∼65% +20%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
735 Points ∼63% +16%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
639.84 (494.21min - 639.84max) Points ∼55% +1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
636 (624.68min - 636.38max) Points ∼54%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (575 - 687, n=5)
624 Points ∼53% -2%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
561 Points ∼48% -12%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
549 Points ∼47% -14%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
492 Points ∼42% -23%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
221 Points ∼100% +44%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
197 Points ∼89% +29%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
185 Points ∼84% +21%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
177.86 Points ∼80% +16%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel Core i7-8565U
172 Points ∼78% +12%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
172 Points ∼78% +12%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
166 Points ∼75% +8%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
153 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (132 - 154, n=4)
148 Points ∼67% -3%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
140.67 Points ∼64% -8%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
896 Seconds * ∼100% -28%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
863.4 Seconds * ∼96% -24%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
816.8 Seconds * ∼91% -17%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (699 - 769, n=4)
747 Seconds * ∼83% -7%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
699 Seconds * ∼78%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
696 Seconds * ∼78% -0%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
603 Seconds * ∼67% +14%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
566 Seconds * ∼63% +19%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
476 Seconds * ∼53% +32%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5416 MIPS ∼100% +35%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4838 MIPS ∼89% +20%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4516 MIPS ∼83% +12%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4451 MIPS ∼82% +11%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
4302 MIPS ∼79% +7%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
4261 MIPS ∼79% +6%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
4018 MIPS ∼74%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (3951 - 4022, n=4)
3993 MIPS ∼74% -1%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
3687 MIPS ∼68% -8%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
31858 MIPS ∼100% +64%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
25815 MIPS ∼81% +33%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22655 MIPS ∼71% +17%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
21927 MIPS ∼69% +13%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
19407 MIPS ∼61%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (17799 - 21107, n=4)
19279 MIPS ∼61% -1%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
16887 MIPS ∼53% -13%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
15495 MIPS ∼49% -20%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
15114 MIPS ∼47% -22%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1417 Points ∼100%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1308 Points ∼92%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
1220 Points ∼86%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1172 Points ∼83%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1168 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
 
984 Points ∼69%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
925 Points ∼65%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
6502 Points ∼100%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
6234 Points ∼96%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5059 Points ∼78%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4144 Points ∼64%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
3480 Points ∼54%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
 
3359 Points ∼52%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3337 Points ∼51%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
8.18 fps ∼100% +51%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
7.33 fps ∼90% +35%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.59 fps ∼81% +22%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5.82 fps ∼71% +7%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
5.42 fps ∼66%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (4.72 - 5.42, n=4)
5.08 fps ∼62% -6%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
4.47 fps ∼55% -18%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4.29 fps ∼52% -21%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
4.25 fps ∼52% -22%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
73.31 s * ∼100% -1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
72.7 s * ∼99%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (63.6 - 76, n=3)
70.8 s * ∼97% +3%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
65.2 s * ∼89% +10%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
59.04 s * ∼81% +19%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
55.5 s * ∼76% +24%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
51 s * ∼70% +30%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
47.5 s * ∼65% +35%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * ∼63% +37%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U
0.843 sec * ∼100% -14%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (0.738 - 0.786, n=3)
0.757 sec * ∼90% -3%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1
0.749 sec * ∼89% -1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
0.738 sec * ∼88%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
0.679 sec * ∼81% +8%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.625 sec * ∼74% +15%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
0.623 sec * ∼74% +16%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
0.598 sec * ∼71% +19%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.56 sec * ∼66% +24%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
636 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
40.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
153 Points
Help

系统性能

PCMark 10的结果被我们设备中缓慢的Iris Plus Graphics 655拖累。特别是,与我们数据库中配备完全相同的GPU的普通笔记本电脑相比,我们的数字内容创作得分比它应该达到的水平低17%左右。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5402 Points ∼100% +51%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Kingston SA2000M81000G
5307 Points ∼98% +48%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
4329 Points ∼80% +21%
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3883 Points ∼72% +8%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (3284 - 4132, n=4)
3765 Points ∼70% +5%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
3580 Points ∼66%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
3449 Points ∼64% -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
9874 Points ∼100% +28%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Kingston SA2000M81000G
9294 Points ∼94% +20%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
9270 Points ∼94% +20%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
7997 Points ∼81% +4%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (7364 - 8351, n=4)
7838 Points ∼79% +2%
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
7775 Points ∼79% +1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7715 Points ∼78%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
8111 Points ∼100% +35%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Kingston SA2000M81000G
7945 Points ∼98% +32%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
6996 Points ∼86% +16%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
6029 Points ∼74%
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5799 Points ∼71% -4%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (4390 - 6400, n=4)
5792 Points ∼71% -4%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
5286 Points ∼65% -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
5691 Points ∼100% +112%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Kingston SA2000M81000G
5495 Points ∼97% +105%
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3526 Points ∼62% +32%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (2679 - 3613, n=4)
3214 Points ∼56% +20%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
3187 Points ∼56% +19%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
2679 Points ∼47%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
2635 Points ∼46% -2%
PCMark 10 Score
3580 points
Help

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示在我们的主页上打开多个标签时有延迟问题。尽管我们的Iris Plus Graphics 655的图形性能比预期的要慢,但在60 FPS下的4K UHD视频播放还是很流畅,没有丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1521.2 μs * ∼100% -54%
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
1343.1 μs * ∼88% -36%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
1268.4 μs * ∼83% -28%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
990.3 μs * ∼65%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
586.8 μs * ∼39% +41%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Kingston SA2000M81000G
335.4 μs * ∼22% +66%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备 - 多达2个M.2 2280固态硬盘

根据我们自己的测试和基准,我们的测试装置配备了一个预算的512GB金士顿NVMe固态硬盘,连续读取和写入速度分别高达约1600MB/s和约1000MB/s。更快的NVMe驱动器是存在的,但该系统只能支持到PCI x2而不是x4的速度,考虑到价格、ULV处理器和图形,这是可以接受的。如果安装第二个驱动器,请记住,它必须是M.2 SATA III驱动器。

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
系统可同时支持一个M.2 PCIe3 x2 2280 NVMe SSD和一个M.2 SATA III 2280 SSD
系统可同时支持一个M.2 PCIe3 x2 2280 NVMe SSD和一个M.2 SATA III 2280 SSD
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Teclast BD256GB
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
Honor MagicBook 15
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
AS SSD
-54%
54%
33%
-35%
Seq Read
1404.08
523
-63%
2082.32
48%
2829.79
102%
1423.43
1%
Seq Write
962.22
443
-54%
1843.62
92%
2187.14
127%
766.19
-20%
4K Read
36.5
23.12
-37%
44.33
21%
45.36
24%
42.21
16%
4K Write
97.49
96.97
-1%
157.46
62%
88.57
-9%
74.83
-23%
4K-64 Read
776.02
202.43
-74%
1039.02
34%
731.88
-6%
972.67
25%
4K-64 Write
684.97
264.1
-61%
1555.75
127%
1198.51
75%
218.8
-68%
Access Time Read *
0.066
0.122
-85%
0.05
24%
0.055
17%
0.125
-89%
Access Time Write *
0.136
0.171
-26%
0.065
52%
0.037
73%
0.552
-306%
Score Read
953
278
-71%
1292
36%
1060
11%
1157
21%
Score Write
879
405
-54%
1898
116%
1506
71%
370
-58%
Score Total
2304
830
-64%
3845
67%
3087
34%
2094
-9%
Copy ISO MB/s
961.47
1440.7
50%
1150.94
20%
1150.59
20%
Copy Program MB/s
442.21
484.92
10%
239.28
-46%
499.35
13%
Copy Game MB/s
898.16
1098.19
22%
634.76
-29%
732.94
-18%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-9%
85%
99%
42%
Write 4K
52.06
109.36
110%
116.8
124%
136.1
161%
93.29
79%
Read 4K
27.74
38.89
40%
43.92
58%
42.88
55%
45.9
65%
Write Seq
798.6
405.24
-49%
1990
149%
2335
192%
1211
52%
Read Seq
813.5
528.53
-35%
1959
141%
2183
168%
1633
101%
Write 4K Q32T1
306.6
284.18
-7%
373.3
22%
261.2
-15%
273.1
-11%
Read 4K Q32T1
373.2
337.77
-9%
523.9
40%
328.1
-12%
356
-5%
Write Seq Q32T1
1042
436.5
-58%
1985
90%
2348
125%
1198
15%
Read Seq Q32T1
1612
559.8
-65%
2456
52%
3564
121%
2269
41%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-32% / -35%
70% / 65%
66% / 57%
4% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1612 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1042 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 373.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 306.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 813.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 798.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 27.74 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 52.06 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520482.55753.47888.14946.23946.65947.07947.28947.7947.7948.33948.33948.96948.96949.38949.59949.59950.42950.64950.83951.04952.95956.09958.19962.38962.76963.6963.85964.02965.11965.28966.799671239.451397.891426.271429.911432.981535.531588.981589.431590.031590.241590.241590.271590.651590.861590.91590.91591.071591.28Tooltip
: Ø1147 (482.55-1591.28)

GPU性能 - 表现不佳

图形性能异常低下,比平均水平慢了近50%。Iris Plus Graphics 655在我们的数据库中。即使更新了驱动程序,我们的结果也不会改变。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
8204 Points ∼100% +501%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
5751 Points ∼70% +321%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), R7 5700U
5667 Points ∼69% +315%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
5418 Points ∼66% +297%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U
4173 Points ∼51% +206%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U
3965 Points ∼48% +190%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
3487 Points ∼43% +155%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
2632 Points ∼32% +93%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (1365 - 3081, n=5)
2614 Points ∼32% +92%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-1035G1
2115 Points ∼26% +55%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
2065 Points ∼25% +51%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1813 Points ∼22% +33%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1759 Points ∼21% +29%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
1744 Points ∼21% +28%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
1365 Points ∼17%
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
6009 Points ∼100% +383%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
4475 Points ∼74% +259%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
4439 Points ∼74% +257%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), R7 5700U
3553 Points ∼59% +185%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), R5 4500U
3405 Points ∼57% +173%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
2903 Points ∼48% +133%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U
2799 Points ∼47% +125%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
2306 Points ∼38% +85%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (1245 - 2683, n=5)
2232 Points ∼37% +79%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-1035G1
2223 Points ∼37% +79%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
2154 Points ∼36% +73%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
1783 Points ∼30% +43%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1641 Points ∼27% +32%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1548 Points ∼26% +24%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
1245 Points ∼21%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
4753 Points ∼100% +417%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
4126 Points ∼87% +348%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
3596 Points ∼76% +291%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), R7 5700U
3430 Points ∼72% +273%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U
2612 Points ∼55% +184%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
1809 Points ∼38% +97%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (920 - 2260, n=6)
1806 Points ∼38% +96%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
1667 Points ∼35% +81%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-1035G1
1666 Points ∼35% +81%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
1530 Points ∼32% +66%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1210 Points ∼25% +32%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
1189 Points ∼25% +29%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
1092 Points ∼23% +19%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
920 Points ∼19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
1945 Points ∼100% +546%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
1276 Points ∼66% +324%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
1089 Points ∼56% +262%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), R7 5700U
1040 Points ∼53% +246%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U
673 Points ∼35% +124%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
563 Points ∼29% +87%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (301 - 633, n=7)
556 Points ∼29% +85%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
517 Points ∼27% +72%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-1035G1
437 Points ∼22% +45%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
419 Points ∼22% +39%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
382 Points ∼20% +27%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
373 Points ∼19% +24%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
301 Points ∼15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
2103 Points ∼100% +504%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7
1419 Points ∼67% +308%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
1236 Points ∼59% +255%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), R7 5700U
1187 Points ∼56% +241%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U
760 Points ∼36% +118%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
640 Points ∼30% +84%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (348 - 722, n=7)
632 Points ∼30% +82%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
588 Points ∼28% +69%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, i5-1035G1
500 Points ∼24% +44%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1
476 Points ∼23% +37%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H
441 Points ∼21% +27%
HP Pavilion x360 15-dq0065cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U
427 Points ∼20% +23%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U
348 Points ∼17%
3DMark 11 Performance
1548 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6769 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
852 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
348 points
Help
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
51.5 fps ∼100% +465%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
33.5 fps ∼65% +268%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
31 fps ∼60% +240%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
25.377 fps ∼49% +179%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
15.6 fps ∼30% +71%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
15.4 fps ∼30% +69%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (9.11 - 17.3, n=5)
14.7 fps ∼29% +61%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
9.11 fps ∼18%
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
139 (120.9min) fps ∼100% +170%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
99.2 (87.8min) fps ∼71% +93%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
97 (84.9min) fps ∼70% +89%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
95.1 (83.3min) fps ∼68% +85%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
92.6 (74.2min) fps ∼67% +80%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
90.4 (81.3min) fps ∼65% +76%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (51.4 - 98, n=6)
84.8 fps ∼61% +65%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
81.6 (52.7min) fps ∼59% +59%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
79 (70.3min) fps ∼57% +54%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
76.7 (66.8min) fps ∼55% +49%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
71.5 (61.8min) fps ∼51% +39%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
70.6 (60.1min) fps ∼51% +37%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
70.3 (61.6min) fps ∼51% +37%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
51.4 (43.6min) fps ∼37%
1366x768 med (1/3)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
117 (101.1min) fps ∼100% +215%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
82.7 (73.3min) fps ∼71% +123%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
82.1 (70.5min) fps ∼70% +121%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
75.8 (64.7min) fps ∼65% +104%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
69.5 (64.3min) fps ∼59% +87%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
64.2 (50.3min) fps ∼55% +73%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (37.1 - 68, n=6)
59.2 fps ∼51% +60%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
57 (48.7min) fps ∼49% +54%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
54.2 (37.5min) fps ∼46% +46%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
50 (45.3min) fps ∼43% +35%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
45.6 (35.3min) fps ∼39% +23%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
44.1 (38.7min) fps ∼38% +19%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
37.1 (32.3min) fps ∼32%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
31.9 (24.8min) fps ∼27% -14%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
95.6 (83.2min) fps ∼100% +505%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
54.9 (49min) fps ∼57% +247%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
48.8 (44min) fps ∼51% +209%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
42 (38.5min) fps ∼44% +166%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
40 (27.4min) fps ∼42% +153%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
39.3 (35.3min) fps ∼41% +149%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
36.2 (32.6min) fps ∼38% +129%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
29.4 (23.7min) fps ∼31% +86%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (15.8 - 34.7, n=6)
29.3 fps ∼31% +85%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
27.8 (24.9min) fps ∼29% +76%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
21.4 (19.9min) fps ∼22% +35%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
20.9 (16.9min) fps ∼22% +32%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
19.7 (18.4min) fps ∼21% +25%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
15.8 (14.5min) fps ∼17%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
87.7 (75.1min) fps ∼100% +554%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
52.5 (47.1min) fps ∼60% +292%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
45.6 (41min) fps ∼52% +240%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
39.5 (36.2min) fps ∼45% +195%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
38.9 (26min) fps ∼44% +190%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
36.7 (33.1min) fps ∼42% +174%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
32.4 (29min) fps ∼37% +142%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
27.4 (22.2min) fps ∼31% +104%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (13.4 - 30.4, n=6)
25.7 fps ∼29% +92%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
24.5 (22.1min) fps ∼28% +83%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
19.4 (16.2min) fps ∼22% +45%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18.4 (17.5min) fps ∼21% +37%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
17.4 (16.3min) fps ∼20% +30%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
13.4 (12.5min) fps ∼15%
X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
87.3 fps ∼100% +533%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
43.3 fps ∼50% +214%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
42.2 fps ∼48% +206%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
42.2 fps ∼48% +206%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
40.6 fps ∼47% +194%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
38.3 fps ∼44% +178%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
33.6 fps ∼38% +143%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
33.6 fps ∼38% +143%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
28.1 fps ∼32% +104%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (13.8 - 42.8, n=5)
27.1 fps ∼31% +96%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
25.5 fps ∼29% +85%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
22.4 fps ∼26% +62%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
21.2 fps ∼24% +54%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
13.8 fps ∼16%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
8.87 fps ∼10% -36%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
76.6 fps ∼100% +686%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
34.4 fps ∼45% +253%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
34.3 fps ∼45% +252%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
32.4 fps ∼42% +232%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
28.9 fps ∼38% +196%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
25.2 fps ∼33% +158%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
20.2 fps ∼26% +107%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (9.75 - 29.5, n=5)
19.2 fps ∼25% +97%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
18.7 fps ∼24% +92%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
18.7 fps ∼24% +92%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
15.3 fps ∼20% +57%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
14.3 fps ∼19% +47%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
13.7 fps ∼18% +41%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
9.75 fps ∼13%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
7.85 fps ∼10% -19%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
66 fps ∼100% +672%
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
31 fps ∼47% +263%
Tuxedo Aura 15 Gen1
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
30.4 fps ∼46% +256%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
28.9 fps ∼44% +238%
Honor MagicBook 15 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
26.2 fps ∼40% +206%
HP 250 G7-15S40ES
Intel Core i5-1035G1, NVIDIA GeForce MX110
23.6 fps ∼36% +176%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
17.3 fps ∼26% +102%
HP 15s-fq1440ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
17.3 fps ∼26% +102%
Honor MagicBook 15
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
17.2 fps ∼26% +101%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (8.55 - 25.1, n=5)
16.6 fps ∼25% +94%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
13.4 fps ∼20% +57%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
12.9 fps ∼20% +51%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel UHD Graphics 630
12.8 fps ∼19% +50%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
8.55 fps ∼13%
Dynabook Satellite Pro C50-E-105
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
8.33 fps ∼13% -3%
low med. high ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 51.4 37.1 15.8 13.4 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 9.11 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 13.8 9.75 8.55 fps

Emissions — Quiet Most of the Time

系统噪音

在浏览或流媒体等低至中度负载期间,风扇噪音几乎总是很安静。当运行3DMark 06的第一个基准场景时,风扇噪音会慢慢增加到27.9 dB(A),然后回落到一个几乎不明显的25.9 dB(A)。

当长时间运行游戏等更高要求的负载时,风扇噪音会稳步上升,直到最高达到43分贝(A),这对超极本来说并不是一个罕见的上限。除非CPU经常处于紧张的负载下,否则用户不太可能体验到这个最大值。

冷却方案包括两个~45毫米的风扇,中间有两根铜质热管
冷却方案包括两个~45毫米的风扇,中间有两根铜质热管
我们的设备在将耳朵靠近键盘按键时,会出现非常轻微的电子噪音或线圈啸叫。
我们的设备在将耳朵靠近键盘按键时,会出现非常轻微的电子噪音或线圈啸叫。
一个DDR4 SODIMM插槽,总共可扩展到24GB(8GB焊接+16GB可扩展)。
一个DDR4 SODIMM插槽,总共可扩展到24GB(8GB焊接+16GB可扩展)。
注意与CPU相邻的焊接的RAM模块
注意与CPU相邻的焊接的RAM模块
风扇噪音曲线(白色:背景,红色:系统空闲,蓝色:3DMark 06,绿色:Prime95压力)。
风扇噪音曲线(白色:背景,红色:系统空闲,蓝色:3DMark 06,绿色:Prime95压力)。
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA
Vega 8 R4000, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00
Honor MagicBook 15
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Noise
9%
-18%
-18%
-10%
off / environment *
24.3
24.2
-0%
26
-7%
30.7
-26%
28
-15%
Idle Minimum *
24.3
24.2
-0%
26
-7%
30.7
-26%
28
-15%
Idle Average *
24.3
24.2
-0%
26
-7%
30.7
-26%
28
-15%
Idle Maximum *
24.3
24.2
-0%
28.8
-19%
30.7
-26%
28
-15%
Load Average *
27.9
24.2
13%
45
-61%
32.7
-17%
28
-0%
Load Maximum *
43
25.3
41%
45
-5%
38.4
11%
41.9
3%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A)
Load
27.9 / 43 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.637.834.837.82533.231.727.529.43133.626.324.924.34025.127.524.924.75023.326.425.922.96326.926.322.1238024.3232625.110022.920.522.122.212520.31920.320.516016.116.116.820.920016.316.516.921.525016.615.817.323.731517.917.820.630.340014.61516.426.450013.813.614.329.763012.912.612.831.580011.811.411.930.7100012.311.311.130.7125011.61110.929.3160011.511.110.629.320001211.311.328.9250011.511.311.231.6315011.811.511.130.4400012.411.811.333.5500013.111.811.636.3630013.71211.529.3800014.612.311.626.11000014.912.911.525.71250016.313.111.320.61600027.112.910.530SPL25.924.324.443.1N0.70.60.64.3median 13.8median 12.6median 11.6median 29.3Delta2.62.32.82.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseChuwi CoreBook X Pro

温度

无论负载多少,表面温度都不是问题,因为15.6英寸的外形尺寸和双风扇足以冷却Core-U系列处理器。机箱顶部和底部向后的小热点可以分别达到35摄氏度和50摄氏度,手不太可能碰到这些地方。

双后部排气管
双后部排气管
高负荷工作一小时后,AC适配器
高负荷工作一小时后,AC适配器
Max. Load
 31 °C35.6 °C30.2 °C 
 28 °C30.4 °C26.2 °C 
 23.6 °C23.8 °C23 °C 
Maximum: 35.6 °C
Average: 28 °C
32 °C49 °C38.8 °C
28 °C36.4 °C31.2 °C
26.8 °C27.6 °C27.4 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 33 °C
Power Supply (max.)  54.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.2 °C / 75.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+4.7 °C / 8.4 F).
系统空闲(顶部
系统空闲(顶部
系统闲置(底部
系统闲置(底部
Prime95+FurMark的压力(顶)。
Prime95+FurMark的压力(顶)。
Prime95+FurMark的压力(底部)。
Prime95+FurMark的压力(底部)。

压力测试

系统空闲
系统空闲

因此,Turbo Boost的可持续性很差,因为Core i5-8259U的基本时钟频率为2.3 GHz,或仅比稳定的Turbo Boost时钟频率慢100 MHz。

用电池供电运行会影响处理器的性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为6738和1296分,而在主电源上则为9276和1365分。

Prime95压力
Prime95压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
Prime95+FurMark压力
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲 -- -- 39
Prime95压力 2.4 -- 68
Prime95 + FurMark压力 2.0 450

扬声器--铁罐质量

靠近前角的立体声扬声器
靠近前角的立体声扬声器
在最大音量下的粉红噪音显示扬声器可以更响亮。即使按照笔记本电脑的标准,低音也是非常差的
在最大音量下的粉红噪音显示扬声器可以更响亮。即使按照笔记本电脑的标准,低音也是非常差的
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.437.835.42528.331.728.33124.226.324.24028.527.528.55028.626.428.66326.326.326.38024.62324.610021.320.521.312518.21918.216017.516.117.520023.516.523.525021.215.821.231526.217.826.240030.41530.450038.213.638.263046.212.646.280051.911.451.9100058.911.358.9125062.41162.4160058.211.158.2200059.611.359.6250056.411.356.431505711.557400053.411.853.4500053.411.853.46300541254800053.212.353.2100005112.9511250049.713.149.71600049.812.949.8SPL68.724.368.7N20.80.620.8median 51median 12.6median 51Delta132.31335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseChuwi CoreBook X Pro