Geekom Mini IT8 SFF台式机上手

虽小但有能力。 Geekom Mini IT8是一款紧凑型台式机。尽管它的体积很小，但由于其四核CPU和英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655 iGPU，它拥有一些不错的动力。然而，它的旧芯片组限制了它的能力，特别是在游戏方面。

Sam Medley, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/04/2022 🇺🇸 🇸🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Desktop Intel Windows

在过去的几年里，迷你台式机越来越受欢迎，现在这个市场上有比以往更多的选择。最新发布的产品之一是Geekom Mini IT8。它配备了相当多的端口和一个合格的英特尔酷睿i5-8259U与 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655在其紧凑的机箱中。然而，老化的Coffee Lake平台和缺乏驱动支持导致了一些问题，特别是在游戏和图形负载方面。

在这个上手评测中，我们将快速浏览Geekom Mini IT8的许多方面，包括性能、构造质量和我们的总体印象。由于这是一个较短的上手概述，我们不会对Mini IT8进行最终评级。作为一个简短的说明，我们的审查单位是由Geekom提供的。

竞争者包括其他迷你电脑，如贝林克SER4, Beelink GK Mini PC Review: Ready-to-Go HTPC Beelink GTI 11, GMK NucBox 2, 英特尔NUC11TNKi5, 以及(在一定程度上) 英特尔Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK.我们还将比较楚威CoreBook X和 CoreBook X Pro因为它们拥有与Mini IT8相同的Core i5-8259U和Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655。

Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T

Processor

Intel Core i5-8259U 4 x 2.3 - 3.8 GHz, 48 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Coffee Lake-U

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 - 1024 MB VRAM, Core: 1050 MHz, Intel Graphics Driver 30.0.101.1660

Memory

16 GB

, Single-channel (1x16 GB), DDR4-3200 / PC4-25600

Mainboard

Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Storage

Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1, 512 GB

, PCIe Gen 3 NVMe, M.2 2280, 476 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS

Connections

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Combo headphone/microphone, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 45.5 x 116 x 116

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Additional features

12 Months Warranty

Weight

586 g, Power Supply: 287 g

Price

549 USD

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

potential competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
	05/2022	Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655	586 g	45.5 mm		x
	04/2022	Beelink SER4 R7 4800U, Vega 8	494 g	40 mm		x
	12/2021	Beelink GTI 11 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	638 g	39 mm		x
		GMK NucBox 2 i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655	430 g	50 mm		x
		Intel NUC11TNKi5 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	504 g	37 mm		x
		Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK i7-8809G, Vega M GH	1.3 kg	39 mm		x
74.8 %	09/2021	Chuwi CoreBook X Pro i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655	1.8 kg	17.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
79 %	08/2021	Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655	1.5 kg	20.6 mm	14.00"	2160x1440

外壳和连接

箱子主要由半光亮的塑料制成。金属通风口位于两侧，底板由阳极氧化铝凿成。它的建造质量很好，很结实。考虑到IT8的微小体积，这是可以预期的。这台机器拿在手里感觉相当重，这主要是由于里面的组件非常密集。总的来说，迷你IT8给人留下了良好的印象；没有任何结构性问题。黑色在很大程度上是不显眼的，但指纹很容易沿着顶部显现。

考虑到Mini IT8的小尺寸，连接性相当好。它有五个USB 3.2 Gen 2（10 Gbps）USB端口，其中两个是Type-C。背面的Type-C端口还支持DisplayPort。这使用户可以连接多达3个显示器（与HDMI 2.0和Mini DisplayPort 1.4端口结合使用）。侧面的SD卡读卡器是一个不错的补充。

Size Comparison

Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Beelink GTI 11 GMK NucBox 2 Beelink SER4 Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel NUC11TNKi5 DIN A4 ❌

连接性

正面：四麦克风阵列，USB-C 3.2 Gen 2，USB-A 3.2 Gen 2，组合音频插孔，电源按钮

后部。直流输入，迷你显示端口，LAN，2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 2，USB-C 3.2 Gen 2（带显示端口），HDMI 2.0

维护

访问迷你IT8的内部是非常容易的。四颗自锁螺丝将底板固定住。一旦这些螺丝被松开，用户就可以轻轻地把底板拉下来。建议注意：有一条细细的带状电缆将底板上的SATA插槽连接到主板上。

一旦进去，用户就可以接触到空的2.5英寸SATA驱动器插槽、PCIe固态硬盘和两个DDR4 SODIMM插槽（其中一个是开箱即用的）。需要进一步拆卸才能接触到焊接好的处理器进行重新粘贴，但要把主板拿出来是很棘手的。

业绩

Geekom Mini IT8采用的是英特尔酷睿i5-8259U和集成 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU.尽管基于老化的Coffee Lake架构，这款四核超线程芯片仍然相当胜任，特别是对于一般的办公工作和网络浏览。然而，由于它是一个U系列处理器，它受到15瓦TDP的限制。与其他迷你台式机相比，i5-8259U在大多数基准测试中都落后。

处理器

酷睿i5-8259U为一般计算提供了足够的动力，对大多数用户来说应该是足够的。该CPU有四个超线程核心，基本时钟为2.3GHz，单核涡轮增压最高可达3.8GHz。

虽然Geekom Mini IT8的CPU能够很容易地处理大多数办公任务、网络浏览和一般任务，但它明显落后于较新的芯片，如Tiger Lake 酷睿i5-1135G7存在于英特尔NUC11TNKi5和贝岭GTI 11.AMD的 Ryzen 7 4800U, 正如在 Beelink SER4在Cinebench R20的单核测试中快32%，比8259U的多核得分快一倍多（可能是由于4800U的16个线程）。

从好的方面看，Geekom Mini IT8没有表现出节流现象。在我们的Cinebench R15多核测试循环中，它保持稳定。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U: Ø594 (591.39-600.38)

Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U: Ø1404 (1390.29-1411.03)

Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø829 (822.06-915.5)

GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U: Ø612 (608.07-614.94)

Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø789 (772.57-794.38)

Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G: Ø857 (853.53-862.44)

Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U: Ø629 (624.68-636.38)

Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U: Ø571 (559.33-575.29)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	582 Points ∼100% +58%
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	579 Points ∼99% +57%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	520 Points ∼89% +41%
Average of class Desktop (170 - 853, n=41, last 2 years)	506 Points ∼87% +37%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	503 Points ∼86% +36%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	488 Points ∼84% +32%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	428 Points ∼74% +16%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G	404 Points ∼69% +9%
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U	386 Points ∼66% +5%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	382 Points ∼66% +4%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U	381 Points ∼65% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (369 - 386, n=5)	378 Points ∼65% +2%
Beelink SER3 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	377 Points ∼65% +2%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	369 Points ∼63%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	4596 Points ∼100% +212%
Average of class Desktop (285 - 14891, n=41, last 2 years)	4131 Points ∼90% +181%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	3248 Points ∼71% +121%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	2657 Points ∼58% +81%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	2163 Points ∼47% +47%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G	2005 Points ∼44% +36%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1974 Points ∼43% +34%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	1820 Points ∼40% +24%
Beelink SER3 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1514 Points ∼33% +3%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U	1512 Points ∼33% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (1385 - 1567, n=5)	1473 Points ∼32% 0%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	1471 Points ∼32%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	1432 Points ∼31% -3%
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U	1385 Points ∼30% -6%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	240 Points ∼100% +64%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	230 Points ∼96% +57%
Average of class Desktop (63.1 - 319, n=42, last 2 years)	205 Points ∼85% +40%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	201 Points ∼84% +37%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	200 Points ∼83% +37%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	187 Points ∼78% +28%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G	178 Points ∼74% +22%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	168 Points ∼70% +15%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U	153 Points ∼64% +5%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	151 Points ∼63% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (132 - 154, n=6)	147.1 Points ∼61% +1%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	146.3 Points ∼61%
Beelink SER3 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	146 Points ∼61% 0%
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U	132 Points ∼55% -10%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1963 (1889.11^min - 1963.48^max) Points ∼100% +227%
Average of class Desktop (128 - 6236, n=42, last 2 years)	1750 Points ∼89% +192%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	1411 (1390.29^min - 1411.03^max) Points ∼72% +135%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	986 (962.77^min - 985.76^max) Points ∼50% +64%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	916 (822.06^min - 915.5^max) Points ∼47% +53%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G	864 Points ∼44% +44%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	794 (772.57^min - 794.38^max) Points ∼40% +32%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	790 Points ∼40% +32%
Beelink SER3 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	680 (670.93^min - 679.66^max) Points ∼35% +13%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U	636 (624.68^min - 636.38^max) Points ∼32% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (575 - 687, n=7)	622 Points ∼32% +4%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	615 (608.07^min - 614.94^max) Points ∼31% +3%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	600 (591.39^min - 600.38^max) Points ∼31%
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U	575 (559.33^min - 575.29^max) Points ∼29% -4%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Desktop (82 - 3767, n=40, last 2 years)	782 Seconds * ∼100% -11%
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U	766 Seconds * ∼98% -9%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	755 Seconds * ∼97% -7%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (688 - 769, n=6)	730 Seconds * ∼93% -4%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	704 Seconds * ∼90%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U	699 Seconds * ∼89% +1%
Beelink SER3 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	672 Seconds * ∼86% +5%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	600 Seconds * ∼77% +15%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	585 Seconds * ∼75% +17%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	551 Seconds * ∼70% +22%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G	537 Seconds * ∼69% +24%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	468 Seconds * ∼60% +34%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	340 Seconds * ∼43% +52%
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	262 Seconds * ∼34% +63%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5791 MIPS ∼100% +46%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5405 MIPS ∼93% +36%
Average of class Desktop (2237 - 8211, n=39, last 2 years)	5150 MIPS ∼89% +30%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	4852 MIPS ∼84% +22%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	4738 MIPS ∼82% +19%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	4603 MIPS ∼79% +16%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	4253 MIPS ∼73% +7%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G	4101 MIPS ∼71% +3%
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U	4022 MIPS ∼69% +1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U	4018 MIPS ∼69% +1%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	3970 MIPS ∼69%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	3951 MIPS ∼68% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (3753 - 4022, n=6)	3949 MIPS ∼68% -1%
Beelink SER3 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	3752 MIPS ∼65% -5%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	56761 MIPS ∼100% +97%
Average of class Desktop (3974 - 158242, n=39, last 2 years)	47072 MIPS ∼83% +63%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	40117 MIPS ∼71% +39%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	28824 MIPS ∼51%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	27203 MIPS ∼48% -6%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	24655 MIPS ∼43% -14%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	23280 MIPS ∼41% -19%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	21679 MIPS ∼38% -25%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (17799 - 28824, n=6)	20778 MIPS ∼37% -28%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U	19407 MIPS ∼34% -33%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G	19347 MIPS ∼34% -33%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	18802 MIPS ∼33% -35%
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U	17799 MIPS ∼31% -38%
Beelink SER3 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	17077 MIPS ∼30% -41%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1560 Points ∼100% +64%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1559 Points ∼100% +64%
Average of class Desktop (462 - 2241, n=38, last 2 years)	1419 Points ∼91% +49%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1415 Points ∼91% +49%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	1396 Points ∼89% +47%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	1192 Points ∼76% +25%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	1099 Points ∼70% +16%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	984 Points ∼63% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (948 - 984, n=3)	961 Points ∼62% +1%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	951 Points ∼61%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Average of class Desktop (844 - 24033, n=38, last 2 years)	8229 Points ∼100% +128%
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	8147 Points ∼99% +126%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	6375 Points ∼77% +77%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	5059 Points ∼61% +40%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	4975 Points ∼60% +38%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	4593 Points ∼56% +27%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	3939 Points ∼48% +9%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	3607 Points ∼44%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (3359 - 3839, n=3)	3602 Points ∼44% 0%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	3359 Points ∼41% -7%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	14.8 fps ∼100% +177%
Average of class Desktop (0.88 - 44, n=39, last 2 years)	12.9 fps ∼87% +141%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	10.4 fps ∼70% +94%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	8.47 fps ∼57% +58%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G	7.1 fps ∼48% +33%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	6.98 fps ∼47% +30%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	6.63 fps ∼45% +24%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	6.28 fps ∼42% +17%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U	5.42 fps ∼37% +1%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	5.37 fps ∼36% 0%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	5.35 fps ∼36%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (4.72 - 5.49, n=6)	5.19 fps ∼35% -3%
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U	4.81 fps ∼33% -10%
Beelink SER3 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	4.14 fps ∼28% -23%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Beelink SER3 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	86.5 s * ∼100% -20%
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U	76 s * ∼88% -5%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U	72.7 s * ∼84% -1%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	72.3 s * ∼84%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (62.7 - 76, n=5)	69.5 s * ∼80% +4%
Average of class Desktop (33.6 - 159, n=39, last 2 years)	67.2 s * ∼78% +7%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	63.6 s * ∼74% +12%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	62.6 s * ∼72% +13%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	54.5 s * ∼63% +25%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	51.3 s * ∼59% +29%
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	49.7 s * ∼57% +31%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	42.2 s * ∼49% +42%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U	0.806 sec * ∼100%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U	0.786 sec * ∼98% +2%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (0.738 - 0.818, n=5)	0.779 sec * ∼97% +3%
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U	0.746 sec * ∼93% +7%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U	0.738 sec * ∼92% +8%
Beelink SER3 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	0.723 sec * ∼90% +10%
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U	0.72 sec * ∼89% +11%
Average of class Desktop (0.356 - 1.525, n=39, last 2 years)	0.695 sec * ∼86% +14%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.627 sec * ∼78% +22%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.622 sec * ∼77% +23%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	0.576 sec * ∼71% +29%
Intel NUC11PAQi7 Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.553 sec * ∼69% +31%
Beelink GTR5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.48 sec * ∼60% +40%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

600 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

79.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

146.3 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

总体性能对一般使用来说是足够的，但老化的Coffee Lake平台落后于较新的硬件。

一般系统性能对大多数任务来说是足够的。虽然它落后于采用较新芯片组的设备，但Geekom Mini IT8为繁忙的网络浏览和参与办公任务提供了足够的动力。然而，运行多个CPU密集型任务（如在几个大型电子表格中同时运行公式）可能会导致一些速度减慢。Geekom桌面在数字内容创作方面明显落后，可能是由于其较弱的英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655iGPU。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Desktop (1707 - 10153, n=34, last 2 years)	5488 Points ∼100% +34%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Vega M GH, i7-8809G, Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA	5301 Points ∼97% +29%
Beelink SER4 Vega 8, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5257 Points ∼96% +28%
Beelink GTI 11 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston SA2000M8500G	4952 Points ∼90% +21%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S	4512 Points ∼82% +10%
GMK NucBox 2 Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Netac S930E8/256GPN	4132 Points ∼75% +1%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	4099 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (3284 - 4132, n=6)	3882 Points ∼71% -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Beelink GTI 11 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston SA2000M8500G	9893 Points ∼100% +23%
Beelink SER4 Vega 8, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9188 Points ∼93% +14%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Vega M GH, i7-8809G, Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA	9125 Points ∼92% +13%
Average of class Desktop (4754 - 12421, n=33, last 2 years)	9009 Points ∼91% +12%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S	9000 Points ∼91% +12%
GMK NucBox 2 Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Netac S930E8/256GPN	8351 Points ∼84% +4%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	8064 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (7364 - 8351, n=6)	7938 Points ∼80% -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Beelink SER4 Vega 8, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7916 Points ∼100% +33%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Vega M GH, i7-8809G, Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA	7915 Points ∼100% +33%
Average of class Desktop (2958 - 12564, n=33, last 2 years)	7498 Points ∼95% +26%
Beelink GTI 11 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston SA2000M8500G	6400 Points ∼81% +7%
GMK NucBox 2 Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Netac S930E8/256GPN	6348 Points ∼80% +6%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S	6190 Points ∼78% +4%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	5970 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (4390 - 6400, n=6)	5852 Points ∼74% -2%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Desktop (960 - 20009, n=33, last 2 years)	7082 Points ∼100% +82%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Vega M GH, i7-8809G, Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA	5598 Points ∼79% +44%
Beelink SER4 Vega 8, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5422 Points ∼77% +40%
Beelink GTI 11 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston SA2000M8500G	5206 Points ∼74% +34%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S	4474 Points ∼63% +15%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	3884 Points ∼55%
GMK NucBox 2 Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Netac S930E8/256GPN	3613 Points ∼51% -7%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (2679 - 3902, n=6)	3441 Points ∼49% -11%

PCMark 10 Score		4099 points
Help

DPC延时

Geekom Mini IT8似乎适合渲染实时音频。根据LatencyMon，DPC延迟方面没有明显的问题。在我们长达1分钟的YouTube测试中，以60 FPS的速度流传4K视频是完全流畅的，没有丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	990 μs * ∼100% -42%
Chuwi CoreBook X Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	903 μs * ∼91% -29%
GMK NucBox 2 Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Netac S930E8/256GPN	786 μs * ∼79% -13%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	698 μs * ∼71%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S	525 μs * ∼53% +25%
Beelink SER4 Vega 8, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	336 μs * ∼34% +52%
Beelink GTI 11 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston SA2000M8500G	278.2 μs * ∼28% +60%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Geekom Mini IT8配备了一块512GB的金士顿PCIe第三代固态硬盘。这块硬盘很有活力，提供了良好的读写速度。根据我们的DiskSpd读取循环测试，它还提供了访问时间的一致性。由于该驱动器可以随时更换，用户可以很容易地把这块固态硬盘换成他们喜欢的那块，尽管该设备只支持到PCIe第三代。Geekom Mini IT8有一个空位，可以放置一个2.5英寸的SATA III驱动器。

	Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	Beelink SER4 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Beelink GTI 11 Kingston SA2000M8500G	GMK NucBox 2 Netac S930E8/256GPN	Intel NUC11TNKi5 Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S	Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA	Average Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1	Average of class Desktop
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		32%	81%	39%	-34%	35%	30%	32%
Write 4K	114.2	183.3 61%	231.2 102%	178.4 56%	65.9 -42%	133.7 17%	176.8 ?(114.2 - 293, n=4) 55%	148.7 ?(15.4 - 304, n=27, last 2 years) 30%
Read 4K	46.92	62.2 33%	66.1 41%	61 30%	24.27 -48%	178.6 281%	47.9 ?(31.3 - 62.1, n=4) 2%	44.5 ?(12.8 - 75.1, n=27, last 2 years) -5%
Write Seq	928.6	976 5%	1942 109%	1040 12%	456.4 -51%	608 -35%	942 ?(459 - 1191, n=4) 1%	1316 ?(64.6 - 4399, n=25, last 2 years) 42%
Read Seq	838.3	1629 94%	1739 107%	1919 129%	542 -35%	1428 70%	1424 ?(838 - 1792, n=4) 70%	1455 ?(266 - 3844, n=25, last 2 years) 74%
Write 4K Q32T1	220.3	443.1 101%	495.3 125%	417.7 90%	331.3 50%	323.6 47%	369 ?(220 - 499, n=4) 67%	359 ?(15.3 - 788, n=27, last 2 years) 63%
Read 4K Q32T1	316.2	339 7%	648 105%	325.6 3%	295 -7%	282.3 -11%	508 ?(316 - 719, n=4) 61%	426 ?(28 - 1020, n=27, last 2 years) 35%
Write Seq Q32T1	1227.2	979 -20%	2055 67%	1144 -7%	506 -59%	627 -49%	1022 ?(436 - 1227, n=4) -17%	1529 ?(90 - 6107, n=27, last 2 years) 25%
Read Seq Q32T1	2510.5	1837 -27%	2235 -11%	2379 -5%	562 -78%	1521 -39%	2460 ?(2222 - 2554, n=4) -2%	2236 ?(224 - 7080, n=27, last 2 years) -11%
AS SSD		11%	68%	-65%	-92%	46%	-13%	18%
Seq Read	1907.57	1653 -13%	2006 5%	2069 8%	527 -72%	1379 -28%	1910 ?(1451 - 2304, n=4) 0%	1905 ?(265 - 5664, n=30, last 2 years) 0%
Seq Write	1039.43	869 -16%	1904 83%	1203 16%	469 -55%	553 -47%	759 ?(308 - 1145, n=4) -27%	1289 ?(117 - 4006, n=30, last 2 years) 24%
4K Read	43.19	56.4 31%	60.9 41%	41.66 -4%	20.41 -53%	127.9 196%	38.8 ?(24 - 57.9, n=4) -10%	42.2 ?(10.7 - 83.9, n=30, last 2 years) -2%
4K Write	57.24	163.7 186%	203.7 256%	136.9 139%	42.52 -26%	103.5 81%	98.4 ?(57.2 - 152.4, n=4) 72%	130.6 ?(13.5 - 308, n=30, last 2 years) 128%
4K-64 Read	772.77	321.8 -58%	740 -4%	366.3 -53%	231.4 -70%	1258 63%	574 ?(257 - 773, n=4) -26%	655 ?(25.7 - 2446, n=30, last 2 years) -15%
4K-64 Write	385.27	778 102%	1092 183%	340.5 -12%	285.3 -26%	556 44%	580 ?(243 - 984, n=4) 51%	954 ?(13.7 - 5085, n=30, last 2 years) 148%
Access Time Read *	0.131	0.085 35%	0.047 64%	0.064 51%	0.124 5%	0.025 81%	0.0965 ?(0.105 - 0.15, n=4) 26%	0.1153 ?(0.035 - 0.311, n=30, last 2 years) 12%
Access Time Write *	0.03	0.137 -357%	0.083 -177%	0.347 -1057%	0.269 -797%	0.033 -10%	0.1128 ?(0.029 - 0.353, n=4) -276%	0.1509 ?(0.012 - 0.942, n=30, last 2 years) -403%
Score Read	1007	544 -46%	1001 -1%	615 -39%	304 -70%	1524 51%	804 ?(478 - 1007, n=4) -20%	906 ?(65 - 3086, n=30, last 2 years) -10%
Score Write	546	1028 88%	1486 172%	598 10%	375 -31%	714 31%	754 ?(387 - 1251, n=4) 38%	1233 ?(39 - 5665, n=30, last 2 years) 126%
Score Total	2035	1833 -10%	3013 48%	1497 -26%	839 -59%	3023 49%	1922 ?(1033 - 2722, n=4) -6%	2520 ?(136 - 8263, n=30, last 2 years) 24%
Copy ISO MB/s	1018.16	2017 98%	1714 68%	1186 16%	490.9 -52%	1125 10%	977 ?(278 - 1636, n=3) -4%	1435 ?(123.8 - 3802, n=28, last 2 years) 41%
Copy Program MB/s	378.31	274.7 -27%	357 -6%	428.6 13%	415.9 10%	342.4 -9%	341 ?(282 - 378, n=3) -10%	379 ?(52.6 - 1309, n=28, last 2 years) 0%
Copy Game MB/s	322.02	756 135%	1040 223%	435.7 35%	352.3 9%	768 138%	340 ?(284 - 414, n=3) 6%	888 ?(91 - 2579, n=28, last 2 years) 176%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		22% / 18%	75% / 73%	-13% / -27%	-63% / -71%	41% / 42%	9% / 2%	25% / 23%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2510.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1227.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 316.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 220.3 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 838.3 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 928.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.92 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 114.2 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1: Ø2234 (2060.24-2245.42)

Beelink SER4 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø1407 (1225.09-1439.28)

Beelink GTI 11 Kingston SA2000M8500G: Ø1656 (1490.24-1661.99)

GPU性能

集成的 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655GPU提供了一个比大多数集成图形解决方案更高的水平，但与英特尔较新的 Iris XeiGPU相比，它的年龄明显。它也落后于AMD的Radeon RX VegaiGPU，在大多数基准测试中提供大约一半的性能。虽然Geekom Mini IT8可以处理流媒体和多显示器支持，但有更高图形需求（如照片/视频编辑或3D建模）的用户应该到其他地方去看看。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Desktop (508 - 104464, n=46, last 2 years)	31740 Points ∼100% +994%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, Intel Core i7-8809G	14302 Points ∼45% +393%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H	8517 Points ∼27% +194%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	7420 Points ∼23% +156%
Beelink SER4 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	6036 Points ∼19% +108%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	5566 Points ∼18% +92%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	5221 Points ∼16% +80%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U	2947 Points ∼9% +2%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U	2900 Points ∼9%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (1365 - 3081, n=8)	2707 Points ∼9% -7%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Desktop (378 - 65879, n=44, last 2 years)	19552 Points ∼100% +886%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, Intel Core i7-8809G	10248 Points ∼52% +417%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	5970 Points ∼31% +201%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H	4766 Points ∼24% +140%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	4010 Points ∼21% +102%
Beelink SER4 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	3927 Points ∼20% +98%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	3152 Points ∼16% +59%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U	1983 Points ∼10%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U	1914 Points ∼10% -3%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (920 - 2260, n=9)	1836 Points ∼9% -7%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Desktop (2453 - 246319, n=40, last 2 years)	71615 Points ∼100% +369%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, Intel Core i7-8809G	59162 Points ∼83% +288%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H	27524 Points ∼38% +80%
Beelink SER4 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	27339 Points ∼38% +79%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	25008 Points ∼35% +64%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	19330 Points ∼27% +27%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U	15259 Points ∼21%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U	15258 Points ∼21% 0%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (6498 - 16698, n=9)	13736 Points ∼19% -10%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Desktop (102 - 36138, n=41, last 2 years)	11155 Points ∼100% +1735%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, Intel Core i7-8809G	2908 Points ∼26% +378%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H	1896 Points ∼17% +212%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	1871 Points ∼17% +208%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	1281 Points ∼11% +111%
Beelink SER4 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U	1241 Points ∼11% +104%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7	1031 Points ∼9% +70%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U	608 Points ∼5%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U	594 Points ∼5% -2%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (301 - 633, n=10)	570 Points ∼5% -6%

3DMark 11 Performance		3180 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		91026 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		11875 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1851 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		861 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		692 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655最适合于休闲游戏。在FHD（1920x1080）和低/中设置下，像《火箭联盟》这样的轻型游戏可以达到60FPS。将图形滑块调高会降低帧率，但Mini IT8在大多数竞争性游戏中仍能达到30 FPS以上。

不幸的是，大多数现代AAA级游戏是不能玩的，即使在最低设置下。iGPU根本没有能力推动这些像素。我们还注意到一些游戏（如《古墓丽影》）出现了一些奇怪的图形故障，一些游戏（如《DOOM永恒》）在没有认真调整的情况下无法启动。我们把这归结为缺乏驱动支持，多年来这一直是困扰英特尔集成GPU的问题。

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Rocket League | Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Desktop (3.45 - 237, n=44, last 2 years)	109.4 fps ∼100% +544%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH	81.8 fps ∼75% +381%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	72 fps ∼66% +324%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450	69.3 fps ∼63% +308%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350	48.6 fps ∼44% +186%
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	37.3 fps ∼34% +119%
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	36.7 fps ∼34% +116%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	35 fps ∼32% +106%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	33.7 fps ∼31% +98%
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	29.8 fps ∼27% +75%
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	26.8 fps ∼24% +58%
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	17.3 fps ∼16% +2%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	17 fps ∼16%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (9.11 - 18.1, n=8)	15.7 fps ∼14% -8%

Rocket League
1280x720 Performance
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (78 - 133.3, n=3)	102.8 fps ∼100% +32%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	78 fps ∼76%
Average of class Desktop (56.2 - 78, n=2, last 2 years)	67.1 fps ∼65% -14%
1920x1080 Performance
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (60 - 92, n=2)	76 fps ∼100% +27%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	60 fps ∼79%
Average of class Desktop (last 2 years)	60 fps ∼79% 0%
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (40.6 - 59.1, n=3)	48.6 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Desktop (46 - 46.3, n=2, last 2 years)	46.2 fps ∼95% 0%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	46 fps ∼95%
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH	141 (113^min - 196^max) fps ∼100% +292%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	36 fps ∼26%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (32.7 - 38.8, n=3)	35.8 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Desktop (31.3 - 36, n=2, last 2 years)	33.7 fps ∼24% -6%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Average of class Desktop (7 - 332, n=16, last 2 years)	161 fps ∼100% +747%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH	109 (88^min - 171^max) fps ∼68% +474%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	85.5 (24^min - 151^max) fps ∼53% +350%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (19 - 23.5, n=4)	21.3 fps ∼13% +12%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	19 fps ∼12%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average of class Desktop (13 - 319, n=18, last 2 years)	161.9 fps ∼100% +1145%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH	47 (38^min - 90^max) fps ∼29% +262%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	37.2 (26^min - 67^max) fps ∼23% +186%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	13 fps ∼8%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (11 - 13, n=2)	12 fps ∼7% -8%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Average of class Desktop (8 - 315, n=20, last 2 years)	168.2 fps ∼100% +2003%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH	43 (35^min - 78^max) fps ∼26% +438%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	33.8 (6^min - 59^max) fps ∼20% +323%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (8 - 10.1, n=2)	9.05 fps ∼5% +13%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655	8 fps ∼5%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Rocket League | Shadow of the Tomb Raider

	low	med.	high	ultra
Rocket League (2017)	78	46	36
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	17
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	19	13	8

Emissions

应力测试和温度

在压力下，Geekom Mini IT8由于CPU芯片的高温而出现一些节流现象。运行Prime95一小时后，CPU短暂地提升到3.6GHz，然后又稳定在2.7GHz。然而，CPU上的温度在短暂飙升到102℃后，在85℃左右波动。在运行Furmark一小时后，iGPU管理一个稳定的900MHz，同时在70℃保持稳定。

同时运行Prime 95和Furmark会使CPU慢下来，使其节流到1.0-1.1GHz。iGPU也略微回落到800MHz。在所有三项测试中，CPU都达到了28瓦的额定TDP（尽管在Prime95和Furmark测试开始时有一些短暂的峰值，分别为48和43瓦）。

在我们的压力测试中，机箱的触感越来越热，但从未感到热。这可能是由于侧面的通风口和背面的通风口为机箱提供了大量的空气流通。只要这些气流不受限制，外部温度就不会有问题。有一个单一的风扇，与周围的噪音融为一体，基本上不被注意。它只有在负载下才会升温，即使如此，在正常的坐姿下也很难听到。

Pros

+ 体积小

+ 合适的CPU性能

+ 安静的风扇

+ 大量的USB 3.2 Gen 2（10 Gbps）端口

+ 几个支持4K60的显示器连接

+ 2个DDR4 SODIMM，PCIe第3代M.2固态硬盘，以及2.5英寸SATA III

Cons

- 老化的芯片组

- 游戏性能不强

- 光滑的塑料机身会留下指纹

- 没有Wi-Fi 6

- 在长时间的压力下，CPU会发热

判决书

Geekom Mini IT8是一款合格的迷你台式机，在它的小机箱里装了不少端口。虽然它不是市场上最小的台式机，但它在一个很小的机箱里有很好的计算能力，很容易被收起来，不被人发现。

亮点包括显示连接套件（据Geekom称，最多支持四台4K60显示器）和其安静的风扇。酷睿i5-8259U和英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655是办公机器或媒体流HTPC的良好组合。大量的10Gpbs USB端口为连接大量高速USB驱动器进行媒体管理提供了选择。

然而，Coffee Lake CPU在这一点上已经是四年前的产品了，而且它显示了这一点。英特尔的Tiger Lake 和Alder Lake芯片提供了明显更好的性能，而较新的芯片组中的英特尔Xe Graphics iGPU在游戏和图形工作方面远远超过了现在的英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655。不过，以449美元的价格（我们的评测单位），Geekom Mini IT8在提供非常相似的体验的同时，还压低了许多竞争对手。

综上所述，Geekom Mini IT8最适合那些寻找一个既看不见也听不见的小型办公桌的人。对坚实的媒体流媒体PC感兴趣的用户也可能想看看Geekom Mini IT8。

价格和可用性

Geekom Mini IT8可在亚马逊，起价379美元(Core i5-8259U, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD)。我们审查的单位（Core i5-8259U, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD）目前在，售价为449美元。.有兴趣的买家也可以直接从Geekom购买Geekom Mini IT8。以同样的价格购买。

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Sam Medley - Senior Tech Writer - 1257 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2016

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 310909 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

.170

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Geekom Mini IT8 SFF台式机上手

Sam Medley, 2022-05- 4 (Update: 2022-05- 4)