Geekom Mini IT8 SFF台式机上手

在过去的几年里,迷你台式机越来越受欢迎,现在这个市场上有比以往更多的选择。最新发布的产品之一是Geekom Mini IT8。它配备了相当多的端口和一个合格的 英特尔酷睿i5-8259U与 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655在其紧凑的机箱中。然而,老化的Coffee Lake平台和缺乏驱动支持导致了一些问题,特别是在游戏和图形负载方面。
在这个上手评测中,我们将快速浏览Geekom Mini IT8的许多方面,包括性能、构造质量和我们的总体印象。由于这是一个较短的上手概述,我们不会对Mini IT8进行最终评级。作为一个简短的说明,我们的审查单位是由Geekom提供的。
竞争者包括其他迷你电脑,如 贝林克SER4, Beelink GK Mini PC Review: Ready-to-Go HTPCBeelink GTI 11, GMK NucBox 2, 英特尔NUC11TNKi5, 以及(在一定程度上) 英特尔Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK.我们还将比较 楚威CoreBook X和 CoreBook X Pro因为它们拥有与Mini IT8相同的Core i5-8259U和Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655。
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/2022 | Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 586 g | 45.5 mm | x | |||
04/2022 | Beelink SER4 R7 4800U, Vega 8 R4000 | 494 g | 40 mm | x | |||
12/2021 | Beelink GTI 11 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 638 g | 39 mm | x | |||
GMK NucBox 2 i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 430 g | 50 mm | x | ||||
Intel NUC11TNKi5 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 504 g | 37 mm | x | ||||
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK i7-8809G, Vega M GH | 1.3 kg | 39 mm | x | ||||
74.8 % | 09/2021 | Chuwi CoreBook X Pro i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 1.8 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
79 % | 08/2021 | Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 1.5 kg | 20.6 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 |
外壳和连接
箱子主要由半光亮的塑料制成。金属通风口位于两侧,底板由阳极氧化铝凿成。它的建造质量很好,很结实。考虑到IT8的微小体积,这是可以预期的。这台机器拿在手里感觉相当重,这主要是由于里面的组件非常密集。总的来说,迷你IT8给人留下了良好的印象;没有任何结构性问题。黑色在很大程度上是不显眼的,但指纹很容易沿着顶部显现。
考虑到Mini IT8的小尺寸,连接性相当好。它有五个USB 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbps)USB端口,其中两个是Type-C。背面的Type-C端口还支持DisplayPort。这使用户可以连接多达3个显示器(与HDMI 2.0和Mini DisplayPort 1.4端口结合使用)。侧面的SD卡读卡器是一个不错的补充。
连接性
维护
业绩
Geekom Mini IT8采用的是 英特尔酷睿i5-8259U和集成 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU.尽管基于老化的Coffee Lake架构,这款四核超线程芯片仍然相当胜任,特别是对于一般的办公工作和网络浏览。然而,由于它是一个U系列处理器,它受到15瓦TDP的限制。与其他迷你台式机相比,i5-8259U在大多数基准测试中都落后。
处理器
酷睿i5-8259U为一般计算提供了足够的动力,对大多数用户来说应该是足够的。该CPU有四个超线程核心,基本时钟为2.3GHz,单核涡轮增压最高可达3.8GHz。
虽然Geekom Mini IT8的CPU能够很容易地处理大多数办公任务、网络浏览和一般任务,但它明显落后于较新的芯片,如Tiger Lake 酷睿i5-1135G7存在于 英特尔NUC11TNKi5和 贝岭GTI 11.AMD的 Ryzen 7 4800U, 正如在 Beelink SER4在Cinebench R20的单核测试中快32%,比8259U的多核得分快一倍多(可能是由于4800U的16个线程)。
从好的方面看,Geekom Mini IT8没有表现出节流现象。在我们的Cinebench R15多核测试循环中,它保持稳定。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTR5 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
Average of class Desktop (156 - 777, n=37, last 2 years) | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (369 - 386, n=4) | |
Beelink SER3 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Beelink GTR5 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Average of class Desktop (304 - 9630, n=37, last 2 years) | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
Beelink SER3 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (1385 - 1512, n=4) | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Beelink GTR5 | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Average of class Desktop (63.1 - 292, n=37, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (132 - 154, n=5) | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Beelink SER3 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Beelink GTR5 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Average of class Desktop (204 - 3473, n=39, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
Beelink SER3 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (575 - 687, n=6) | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Chuwi CoreBook X |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Desktop (128.3 - 3032, n=37, last 2 years) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (699 - 769, n=5) | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
Beelink SER3 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Beelink GTR5 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Beelink GTR5 | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Average of class Desktop (2215 - 6799, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (3951 - 4022, n=5) | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Beelink SER3 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Beelink GTR5 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average of class Desktop (5694 - 96960, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (17799 - 28824, n=5) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Beelink SER3 |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Beelink GTR5 | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Average of class Desktop (388 - 1969, n=37, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (951 - 984, n=2) | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Beelink GTR5 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Average of class Desktop (1198 - 17698, n=37, last 2 years) | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (3359 - 3607, n=2) | |
GMK NucBox 2 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Beelink GTR5 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Average of class Desktop (0.65 - 29, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (4.72 - 5.42, n=5) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Beelink SER3 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Beelink SER3 | |
Average of class Desktop (38.1 - 367, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (63.6 - 76, n=4) | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Beelink GTR5 | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average of class Desktop (0.3946 - 1.577, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U (0.738 - 0.806, n=4) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
Beelink SER3 | |
Intel NUC10i5FNK | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Intel NUC11PAQi7 | |
Beelink GTR5 |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
一般系统性能对大多数任务来说是足够的。虽然它落后于采用较新芯片组的设备,但Geekom Mini IT8为繁忙的网络浏览和参与办公任务提供了足够的动力。然而,运行多个CPU密集型任务(如在几个大型电子表格中同时运行公式)可能会导致一些速度减慢。Geekom桌面在数字内容创作方面明显落后,可能是由于其较弱的 英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655iGPU。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Average of class Desktop (1707 - 8897, n=31, last 2 years) | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (3284 - 4132, n=5) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average of class Desktop (4754 - 11660, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (7364 - 8351, n=5) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Average of class Desktop (2948 - 10470, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (4390 - 6400, n=5) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Average of class Desktop (960 - 15657, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (2679 - 3884, n=5) |
PCMark 10 Score | 4099 points | |
Help |
DPC延时
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Beelink GTI 11 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1 | Beelink SER4 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Beelink GTI 11 Kingston SA2000M8500G | GMK NucBox 2 Netac S930E8/256GPN | Intel NUC11TNKi5 Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S | Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA | Average Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1 | Average of class Desktop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 32% | 81% | 39% | -34% | 35% | 24% | 19% | |
Write 4K | 114.2 | 183.3 61% | 231.2 102% | 178.4 56% | 65.9 -42% | 133.7 17% | 181.8 ? 59% | 141.2 ? 24% |
Read 4K | 46.92 | 62.2 33% | 66.1 41% | 61 30% | 24.27 -48% | 178.6 281% | 46.8 ? 0% | 45.1 ? -4% |
Write Seq | 928.6 | 976 5% | 1942 109% | 1040 12% | 456.4 -51% | 608 -35% | 859 ? -7% | 1165 ? 25% |
Read Seq | 838.3 | 1629 94% | 1739 107% | 1919 129% | 542 -35% | 1428 70% | 1304 ? 56% | 1411 ? 68% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 220.3 | 443.1 101% | 495.3 125% | 417.7 90% | 331.3 50% | 323.6 47% | 347 ? 58% | 330 ? 50% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 316.2 | 339 7% | 648 105% | 325.6 3% | 295 -7% | 282.3 -11% | 477 ? 51% | 382 ? 21% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1227.2 | 979 -20% | 2055 67% | 1144 -7% | 506 -59% | 627 -49% | 960 ? -22% | 1176 ? -4% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2510.5 | 1837 -27% | 2235 -11% | 2379 -5% | 562 -78% | 1521 -39% | 2429 ? -3% | 1890 ? -25% |
AS SSD | 11% | 68% | -65% | -92% | 46% | -34% | -23% | |
Seq Read | 1907.57 | 1653 -13% | 2006 5% | 2069 8% | 527 -72% | 1379 -28% | 1779 ? -7% | 1505 ? -21% |
Seq Write | 1039.43 | 869 -16% | 1904 83% | 1203 16% | 469 -55% | 553 -47% | 630 ? -39% | 1120 ? 8% |
4K Read | 43.19 | 56.4 31% | 60.9 41% | 41.66 -4% | 20.41 -53% | 127.9 196% | 32.5 ? -25% | 36.4 ? -16% |
4K Write | 57.24 | 163.7 186% | 203.7 256% | 136.9 139% | 42.52 -26% | 103.5 81% | 80.4 ? 40% | 105.7 ? 85% |
4K-64 Read | 772.77 | 321.8 -58% | 740 -4% | 366.3 -53% | 231.4 -70% | 1258 63% | 528 ? -32% | 581 ? -25% |
4K-64 Write | 385.27 | 778 102% | 1092 183% | 340.5 -12% | 285.3 -26% | 556 44% | 445 ? 16% | 652 ? 69% |
Access Time Read * | 0.131 | 0.085 35% | 0.047 64% | 0.064 51% | 0.124 5% | 0.025 81% | 0.09367 ? 28% | 0.2186 ? -67% |
Access Time Write * | 0.03 | 0.137 -357% | 0.083 -177% | 0.347 -1057% | 0.269 -797% | 0.033 -10% | 0.1407 ? -369% | 0.1954 ? -551% |
Score Read | 1007 | 544 -46% | 1001 -1% | 615 -39% | 304 -70% | 1524 51% | 739 ? -27% | 785 ? -22% |
Score Write | 546 | 1028 88% | 1486 172% | 598 10% | 375 -31% | 714 31% | 588 ? 8% | 888 ? 63% |
Score Total | 2035 | 1833 -10% | 3013 48% | 1497 -26% | 839 -59% | 3023 49% | 1656 ? -19% | 2065 ? 1% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1018.16 | 2017 98% | 1714 68% | 1186 16% | 490.9 -52% | 1125 10% | 648 ? -36% | 1276 ? 25% |
Copy Program MB/s | 378.31 | 274.7 -27% | 357 -6% | 428.6 13% | 415.9 10% | 342.4 -9% | 330 ? -13% | 362 ? -4% |
Copy Game MB/s | 322.02 | 756 135% | 1040 223% | 435.7 35% | 352.3 9% | 768 138% | 303 ? -6% | 741 ? 130% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 22% /
18% | 75% /
73% | -13% /
-27% | -63% /
-71% | 41% /
42% | -5% /
-13% | -2% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
集成的 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655GPU提供了一个比大多数集成图形解决方案更高的水平,但与英特尔较新的 Iris XeiGPU相比,它的年龄明显。它也落后于AMD的Radeon RX VegaiGPU,在大多数基准测试中提供大约一半的性能。虽然Geekom Mini IT8可以处理流媒体和多显示器支持,但有更高图形需求(如照片/视频编辑或3D建模)的用户应该到其他地方去看看。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Desktop (508 - 69481, n=36, last 2 years) | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (1365 - 3081, n=7) |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Desktop (378 - 53110, n=39, last 2 years) | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (920 - 2260, n=8) | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Average of class Desktop (2453 - 246319, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (6498 - 16698, n=8) | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Desktop (102 - 21645, n=34, last 2 years) | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (301 - 633, n=9) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 3180 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 91026 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11875 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1851 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 861 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 692 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Desktop (4.13 - 232, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Beelink SER4 | |
Beelink GTI 11 | |
Honor MagicBook 16 2022 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Intel NUC11TNKi5 | |
GMK NucBox 2 | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (9.11 - 17.3, n=7) |
Rocket League | |
1280x720 Performance | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (78 - 133.3, n=3) | |
Average of class Desktop (56.2 - 94, n=4, last 2 years) | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
1920x1080 Performance | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (60 - 92, n=2) | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average of class Desktop (60 - 60, n=3, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (40.6 - 59.1, n=3) | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average of class Desktop (43 - 46.3, n=4, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (32.7 - 38.8, n=3) | |
Average of class Desktop (29 - 36, n=4, last 2 years) |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Average of class Desktop (7 - 248, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (19 - 22, n=3) | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Average of class Desktop (13 - 226, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Average of class Desktop (8 - 226, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE | |
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
low | med. | high | ultra | ||
Rocket League (2017) | 78 | 46 | 36 | fps | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 17 | fps | |||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 19 | 13 | 8 | fps |
Emissions
应力测试和温度
在压力下,Geekom Mini IT8由于CPU芯片的高温而出现一些节流现象。运行Prime95一小时后,CPU短暂地提升到3.6GHz,然后又稳定在2.7GHz。然而,CPU上的温度在短暂飙升到102℃后,在85℃左右波动。在运行Furmark一小时后,iGPU管理一个稳定的900MHz,同时在70℃保持稳定。
同时运行Prime 95和Furmark会使CPU慢下来,使其节流到1.0-1.1GHz。iGPU也略微回落到800MHz。在所有三项测试中,CPU都达到了28瓦的额定TDP(尽管在Prime95和Furmark测试开始时有一些短暂的峰值,分别为48和43瓦)。
在我们的压力测试中,机箱的触感越来越热,但从未感到热。这可能是由于侧面的通风口和背面的通风口为机箱提供了大量的空气流通。只要这些气流不受限制,外部温度就不会有问题。有一个单一的风扇,与周围的噪音融为一体,基本上不被注意。它只有在负载下才会升温,即使如此,在正常的坐姿下也很难听到。
Pros
Cons
判决书
Geekom Mini IT8是一款合格的迷你台式机,在它的小机箱里装了不少端口。虽然它不是市场上最小的台式机,但它在一个很小的机箱里有很好的计算能力,很容易被收起来,不被人发现。
亮点包括显示连接套件(据Geekom称,最多支持四台4K60显示器)和其安静的风扇。酷睿i5-8259U和英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655是办公机器或媒体流HTPC的良好组合。大量的10Gpbs USB端口为连接大量高速USB驱动器进行媒体管理提供了选择。
然而,Coffee Lake CPU在这一点上已经是四年前的产品了,而且它显示了这一点。英特尔的Tiger Lake 和Alder Lake芯片提供了明显更好的性能,而较新的芯片组中的英特尔Xe Graphics iGPU在游戏和图形工作方面远远超过了现在的英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655。不过,以449美元的价格(我们的评测单位),Geekom Mini IT8在提供非常相似的体验的同时,还压低了许多竞争对手。
综上所述,Geekom Mini IT8最适合那些寻找一个既看不见也听不见的小型办公桌的人。对坚实的媒体流媒体PC感兴趣的用户也可能想看看Geekom Mini IT8。
价格和可用性
Geekom Mini IT8可在亚马逊,起价379美元(Core i5-8259U, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD)。我们审查的单位(Core i5-8259U, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD)目前在,售价为449美元。.有兴趣的买家也可以直接从Geekom购买Geekom Mini IT8。以同样的价格购买。