Notebookcheck Logo

Geekom Mini IT8 SFF台式机上手

虽小但有能力。 Geekom Mini IT8是一款紧凑型台式机。尽管它的体积很小,但由于其四核CPU和英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655 iGPU,它拥有一些不错的动力。然而,它的旧芯片组限制了它的能力,特别是在游戏方面。
Sam Medley, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇸🇪 ...
Coffee Lake Desktop Intel Windows

在过去的几年里,迷你台式机越来越受欢迎,现在这个市场上有比以往更多的选择。最新发布的产品之一是Geekom Mini IT8。它配备了相当多的端口和一个合格的 英特尔酷睿i5-8259UIntel Iris Plus Graphics 655在其紧凑的机箱中。然而,老化的Coffee Lake平台和缺乏驱动支持导致了一些问题,特别是在游戏和图形负载方面。

在这个上手评测中,我们将快速浏览Geekom Mini IT8的许多方面,包括性能、构造质量和我们的总体印象。由于这是一个较短的上手概述,我们不会对Mini IT8进行最终评级。作为一个简短的说明,我们的审查单位是由Geekom提供的。

竞争者包括其他迷你电脑,如 贝林克SER4, Beelink GK Mini PC Review: Ready-to-Go HTPCBeelink GTI 11, GMK NucBox 2, 英特尔NUC11TNKi5, 以及(在一定程度上) 英特尔Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK.我们还将比较 楚威CoreBook XCoreBook X Pro因为它们拥有与Mini IT8相同的Core i5-8259U和Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655。

Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Processor
Intel Core i5-8259U 4 x 2.3 - 3.8 GHz, 48 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Coffee Lake-U
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 - 1024 MB, Core: 1050 MHz, Intel Graphics Driver 30.0.101.1660
Memory
16384 MB 
, Single-channel (1x16 GB), DDR4-3200 / PC4-25600
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1, 512 GB 
, PCIe Gen 3 NVMe, M.2 2280, 476 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Connections
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Combo headphone/microphone, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 45.5 x 116 x 116
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Additional features
12 Months Warranty
Weight
586 g, Power Supply: 287 g
Price
549 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
05/2022
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655
586 g45.5 mmx
04/2022
Beelink SER4
R7 4800U, Vega 8 R4000
494 g40 mmx
12/2021
Beelink GTI 11
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
638 g39 mmx
GMK NucBox 2
i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655
430 g50 mmx
Intel NUC11TNKi5
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
504 g37 mmx
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
i7-8809G, Vega M GH
1.3 kg39 mmx
74.8 %
09/2021
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655
1.8 kg17.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
79 %
08/2021
Chuwi CoreBook X
i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655
1.5 kg20.6 mm14.00"2160x1440

外壳和连接

箱子主要由半光亮的塑料制成。金属通风口位于两侧,底板由阳极氧化铝凿成。它的建造质量很好,很结实。考虑到IT8的微小体积,这是可以预期的。这台机器拿在手里感觉相当重,这主要是由于里面的组件非常密集。总的来说,迷你IT8给人留下了良好的印象;没有任何结构性问题。黑色在很大程度上是不显眼的,但指纹很容易沿着顶部显现。

考虑到Mini IT8的小尺寸,连接性相当好。它有五个USB 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbps)USB端口,其中两个是Type-C。背面的Type-C端口还支持DisplayPort。这使用户可以连接多达3个显示器(与HDMI 2.0和Mini DisplayPort 1.4端口结合使用)。侧面的SD卡读卡器是一个不错的补充。

Size Comparison

221 mm 142 mm 39 mm 1.3 kg168 mm 120 mm 39 mm 638 g125 mm 110 mm 50 mm 430 g126 mm 113 mm 40 mm 494 g116 mm 116 mm 45.5 mm 586 g117 mm 112 mm 37 mm 504 g

连接性

正面:四麦克风阵列,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2,USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,组合音频插孔,电源按钮
正面:四麦克风阵列,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2,USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,组合音频插孔,电源按钮
左边:一半大小的SD卡插槽
左边:一半大小的SD卡插槽
后部。直流输入,迷你显示端口,LAN,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(带显示端口),HDMI 2.0
后部。直流输入,迷你显示端口,LAN,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(带显示端口),HDMI 2.0
对。Kensington锁
对。Kensington锁

维护

访问迷你IT8的内部是非常容易的。四颗自锁螺丝将底板固定住。一旦这些螺丝被松开,用户就可以轻轻地把底板拉下来。建议注意:有一条细细的带状电缆将底板上的SATA插槽连接到主板上。

一旦进去,用户就可以接触到空的2.5英寸SATA驱动器插槽、PCIe固态硬盘和两个DDR4 SODIMM插槽(其中一个是开箱即用的)。需要进一步拆卸才能接触到焊接好的处理器进行重新粘贴,但要把主板拿出来是很棘手的。

底部用四颗Phillips #0螺钉固定,这些螺钉是自锁的。
底部用四颗Phillips #0螺钉固定,这些螺钉是自锁的。
底部面板的下方有一个空的2.5 SATA插槽。
底部面板的下方有一个空的2.5 SATA插槽。
有两个DDR4 SODIMM插槽。
有两个DDR4 SODIMM插槽。
PCIe固态硬盘的更换很容易。
PCIe固态硬盘的更换很容易。

业绩

Geekom Mini IT8采用的是 英特尔酷睿i5-8259U和集成 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU.尽管基于老化的Coffee Lake架构,这款四核超线程芯片仍然相当胜任,特别是对于一般的办公工作和网络浏览。然而,由于它是一个U系列处理器,它受到15瓦TDP的限制。与其他迷你台式机相比,i5-8259U在大多数基准测试中都落后。

CPU-Z。CPU
CPU-Z。CPU
CPU-Z。主板
CPU-Z。主板
CPU-Z。内存
CPU-Z。内存
CPU-Z。SPD
CPU-Z。SPD
CPU-Z。图形
CPU-Z。图形
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO64
HWiNFO64
 

处理器

酷睿i5-8259U为一般计算提供了足够的动力,对大多数用户来说应该是足够的。该CPU有四个超线程核心,基本时钟为2.3GHz,单核涡轮增压最高可达3.8GHz。

虽然Geekom Mini IT8的CPU能够很容易地处理大多数办公任务、网络浏览和一般任务,但它明显落后于较新的芯片,如Tiger Lake 酷睿i5-1135G7存在于 英特尔NUC11TNKi5贝岭GTI 11.AMD的 Ryzen 7 4800U, 正如在 Beelink SER4在Cinebench R20的单核测试中快32%,比8259U的多核得分快一倍多(可能是由于4800U的16个线程)。

从好的方面看,Geekom Mini IT8没有表现出节流现象。在我们的Cinebench R15多核测试循环中,它保持稳定。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

07515022530037545052560067575082590097510501125120012751350Tooltip
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Intel Core i5-8259U: Ø594 (591.39-600.38)
Beelink SER4 AMD Ryzen 7 4800U: Ø1404 (1390.29-1411.03)
Beelink GTI 11 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø829 (822.06-915.5)
GMK NucBox 2 Intel Core i5-8259U: Ø612 (608.07-614.94)
Intel NUC11TNKi5 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø789 (772.57-794.38)
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G: Ø857 (853.53-862.44)
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro Intel Core i5-8259U: Ø629 (624.68-636.38)
Chuwi CoreBook X Intel Core i5-8259U: Ø571 (559.33-575.29)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
582 Points ∼100% +58%
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
579 Points ∼99% +57%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
520 Points ∼89% +41%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
503 Points ∼86% +36%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
488 Points ∼84% +32%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
428 Points ∼74% +16%
Average of class Desktop
  (156 - 777, n=37, last 2 years)
419 Points ∼72% +14%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
404 Points ∼69% +9%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
386 Points ∼66% +5%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
382 Points ∼66% +4%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
381 Points ∼65% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (369 - 386, n=4)
380 Points ∼65% +3%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
377 Points ∼65% +2%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
369 Points ∼63%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4596 Points ∼100% +212%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
3248 Points ∼71% +121%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2657 Points ∼58% +81%
Average of class Desktop
  (304 - 9630, n=37, last 2 years)
2354 Points ∼51% +60%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
2163 Points ∼47% +47%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
2005 Points ∼44% +36%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1974 Points ∼43% +34%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
1820 Points ∼40% +24%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1514 Points ∼33% +3%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
1512 Points ∼33% +3%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
1471 Points ∼32%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (1385 - 1512, n=4)
1450 Points ∼32% -1%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
1432 Points ∼31% -3%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
1385 Points ∼30% -6%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Points ∼100% +64%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
230 Points ∼96% +57%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
201 Points ∼84% +37%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
200 Points ∼83% +37%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
187 Points ∼78% +28%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
178 Points ∼74% +22%
Average of class Desktop
  (63.1 - 292, n=37, last 2 years)
169.8 Points ∼71% +16%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
168 Points ∼70% +15%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
153 Points ∼64% +5%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
151 Points ∼63% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (132 - 154, n=5)
147.3 Points ∼61% +1%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
146.3 Points ∼61%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
146 Points ∼61% 0%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
132 Points ∼55% -10%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1963 (1889.11min - 1963.48max) Points ∼100% +227%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
1411 (1390.29min - 1411.03max) Points ∼72% +135%
Average of class Desktop
  (204 - 3473, n=39, last 2 years)
989 Points ∼50% +65%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
986 (962.77min - 985.76max) Points ∼50% +64%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
916 (822.06min - 915.5max) Points ∼47% +53%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
864 Points ∼44% +44%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
794 (772.57min - 794.38max) Points ∼40% +32%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
790 Points ∼40% +32%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
680 (670.93min - 679.66max) Points ∼35% +13%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
636 (624.68min - 636.38max) Points ∼32% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (575 - 687, n=6)
620 Points ∼32% +3%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
615 (608.07min - 614.94max) Points ∼31% +3%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
600 (591.39min - 600.38max) Points ∼31%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
575 (559.33min - 575.29max) Points ∼29% -4%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Average of class Desktop
  (128.3 - 3032, n=37, last 2 years)
932 Seconds * ∼100% -32%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
766 Seconds * ∼82% -9%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
755 Seconds * ∼81% -7%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (699 - 769, n=5)
739 Seconds * ∼79% -5%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
704 Seconds * ∼76%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
699 Seconds * ∼75% +1%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
672 Seconds * ∼72% +5%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
600 Seconds * ∼64% +15%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
585 Seconds * ∼63% +17%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
551 Seconds * ∼59% +22%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
537 Seconds * ∼58% +24%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
468 Seconds * ∼50% +34%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
340 Seconds * ∼36% +52%
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
262 Seconds * ∼28% +63%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5791 MIPS ∼100% +46%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5405 MIPS ∼93% +36%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4852 MIPS ∼84% +22%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4738 MIPS ∼82% +19%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
4603 MIPS ∼79% +16%
Average of class Desktop
  (2215 - 6799, n=36, last 2 years)
4362 MIPS ∼75% +10%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
4253 MIPS ∼73% +7%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
4101 MIPS ∼71% +3%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
4022 MIPS ∼69% +1%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
4018 MIPS ∼69% +1%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (3951 - 4022, n=5)
3988 MIPS ∼69% 0%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
3970 MIPS ∼69%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
3951 MIPS ∼68% 0%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3752 MIPS ∼65% -5%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
56761 MIPS ∼100% +97%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
40117 MIPS ∼71% +39%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
28824 MIPS ∼51%
Average of class Desktop
  (5694 - 96960, n=36, last 2 years)
28569 MIPS ∼50% -1%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
27203 MIPS ∼48% -6%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
24655 MIPS ∼43% -14%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
23280 MIPS ∼41% -19%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
21679 MIPS ∼38% -25%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (17799 - 28824, n=5)
21188 MIPS ∼37% -26%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
19407 MIPS ∼34% -33%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
19347 MIPS ∼34% -33%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
18802 MIPS ∼33% -35%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
17799 MIPS ∼31% -38%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
17077 MIPS ∼30% -41%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1560 Points ∼100% +64%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1559 Points ∼100% +64%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1415 Points ∼91% +49%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1396 Points ∼89% +47%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
1192 Points ∼76% +25%
Average of class Desktop
  (388 - 1969, n=37, last 2 years)
1189 Points ∼76% +25%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
1099 Points ∼70% +16%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
984 Points ∼63% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (951 - 984, n=2)
968 Points ∼62% +2%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
951 Points ∼61%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8147 Points ∼100% +126%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
6375 Points ∼78% +77%
Average of class Desktop
  (1198 - 17698, n=37, last 2 years)
5283 Points ∼65% +46%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5059 Points ∼62% +40%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4975 Points ∼61% +38%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4593 Points ∼56% +27%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
3939 Points ∼48% +9%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
3607 Points ∼44%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (3359 - 3607, n=2)
3483 Points ∼43% -3%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
3359 Points ∼41% -7%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.8 fps ∼100% +177%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
10.4 fps ∼70% +94%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
8.47 fps ∼57% +58%
Average of class Desktop
  (0.65 - 29, n=35, last 2 years)
7.35 fps ∼50% +37%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G
7.1 fps ∼48% +33%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
6.98 fps ∼47% +30%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
6.63 fps ∼45% +24%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
6.28 fps ∼42% +17%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
5.42 fps ∼37% +1%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
5.37 fps ∼36% 0%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
5.35 fps ∼36%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (4.72 - 5.42, n=5)
5.13 fps ∼35% -4%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
4.81 fps ∼33% -10%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4.14 fps ∼28% -23%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
86.5 s * ∼100% -20%
Average of class Desktop
  (38.1 - 367, n=36, last 2 years)
81.3 s * ∼94% -12%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
76 s * ∼88% -5%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
72.7 s * ∼84% -1%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
72.3 s * ∼84%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (63.6 - 76, n=4)
71.2 s * ∼82% +2%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
63.6 s * ∼74% +12%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
62.6 s * ∼72% +13%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
54.5 s * ∼63% +25%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
51.3 s * ∼59% +29%
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.7 s * ∼57% +31%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
42.2 s * ∼49% +42%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U
0.806 sec * ∼100%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U
0.786 sec * ∼98% +2%
Average of class Desktop
  (0.3946 - 1.577, n=35, last 2 years)
0.772 sec * ∼96% +4%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U
  (0.738 - 0.806, n=4)
0.769 sec * ∼95% +5%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Intel Core i5-8259U
0.746 sec * ∼93% +7%
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Intel Core i5-8259U
0.738 sec * ∼92% +8%
Beelink SER3
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
0.723 sec * ∼90% +10%
Intel NUC10i5FNK
Intel Core i5-10210U
0.72 sec * ∼89% +11%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.627 sec * ∼78% +22%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.622 sec * ∼77% +23%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
0.576 sec * ∼71% +29%
Intel NUC11PAQi7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.553 sec * ∼69% +31%
Beelink GTR5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.48 sec * ∼60% +40%
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
600 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
79.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
146.3 Points
Help

系统性能

总体性能对一般使用来说是足够的,但老化的Coffee Lake平台落后于较新的硬件。
总体性能对一般使用来说是足够的,但老化的Coffee Lake平台落后于较新的硬件。

一般系统性能对大多数任务来说是足够的。虽然它落后于采用较新芯片组的设备,但Geekom Mini IT8为繁忙的网络浏览和参与办公任务提供了足够的动力。然而,运行多个CPU密集型任务(如在几个大型电子表格中同时运行公式)可能会导致一些速度减慢。Geekom桌面在数字内容创作方面明显落后,可能是由于其较弱的 英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655iGPU。

PCMark 10 / Score
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Vega M GH, i7-8809G, Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA
5301 Points ∼100% +29%
Beelink SER4
Vega 8 R4000, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5257 Points ∼99% +28%
Beelink GTI 11
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston SA2000M8500G
4952 Points ∼93% +21%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S
4512 Points ∼85% +10%
Average of class Desktop
  (1707 - 8897, n=31, last 2 years)
4366 Points ∼82% +7%
GMK NucBox 2
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Netac S930E8/256GPN
4132 Points ∼78% +1%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
4099 Points ∼77%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (3284 - 4132, n=5)
3831 Points ∼72% -7%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Beelink GTI 11
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston SA2000M8500G
9893 Points ∼100% +23%
Beelink SER4
Vega 8 R4000, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9188 Points ∼93% +14%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Vega M GH, i7-8809G, Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA
9125 Points ∼92% +13%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S
9000 Points ∼91% +12%
GMK NucBox 2
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Netac S930E8/256GPN
8351 Points ∼84% +4%
Average of class Desktop
  (4754 - 11660, n=31, last 2 years)
8210 Points ∼83% +2%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
8064 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (7364 - 8351, n=5)
7883 Points ∼80% -2%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Beelink SER4
Vega 8 R4000, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7916 Points ∼100% +33%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Vega M GH, i7-8809G, Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA
7915 Points ∼100% +33%
Average of class Desktop
  (2948 - 10470, n=31, last 2 years)
6406 Points ∼81% +7%
Beelink GTI 11
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston SA2000M8500G
6400 Points ∼81% +7%
GMK NucBox 2
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Netac S930E8/256GPN
6348 Points ∼80% +6%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S
6190 Points ∼78% +4%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
5970 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (4390 - 6400, n=5)
5827 Points ∼74% -2%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Vega M GH, i7-8809G, Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA
5598 Points ∼100% +44%
Beelink SER4
Vega 8 R4000, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5422 Points ∼97% +40%
Beelink GTI 11
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston SA2000M8500G
5206 Points ∼93% +34%
Average of class Desktop
  (960 - 15657, n=31, last 2 years)
4561 Points ∼81% +17%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S
4474 Points ∼80% +15%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
3884 Points ∼69%
GMK NucBox 2
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Netac S930E8/256GPN
3613 Points ∼65% -7%
Average Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (2679 - 3884, n=5)
3348 Points ∼60% -14%
PCMark 10 Score
4099 points
Help

DPC延时

Geekom Mini IT8似乎适合渲染实时音频。根据LatencyMon,DPC延迟方面没有明显的问题。在我们长达1分钟的YouTube测试中,以60 FPS的速度流传4K视频是完全流畅的,没有丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Chuwi CoreBook X Pro
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
990 μs * ∼100% -42%
Chuwi CoreBook X
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
903 μs * ∼91% -29%
GMK NucBox 2
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Netac S930E8/256GPN
786 μs * ∼79% -13%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
698 μs * ∼71%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S
525 μs * ∼53% +25%
Beelink SER4
Vega 8 R4000, R7 4800U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
336 μs * ∼34% +52%
Beelink GTI 11
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Kingston SA2000M8500G
278.2 μs * ∼28% +60%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Geekom Mini IT8配备了一块512GB的金士顿PCIe第三代固态硬盘。这块硬盘很有活力,提供了良好的读写速度。根据我们的DiskSpd读取循环测试,它还提供了访问时间的一致性。由于该驱动器可以随时更换,用户可以很容易地把这块固态硬盘换成他们喜欢的那块,尽管该设备只支持到PCIe第三代。Geekom Mini IT8有一个空位,可以放置一个2.5英寸的SATA III驱动器。

CDM 8.0.4
CDM 8.0.4
作为SSD 2.0.7316
作为SSD 2.0.7316
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
Beelink SER4
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Beelink GTI 11
Kingston SA2000M8500G
GMK NucBox 2
Netac S930E8/256GPN
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Transcend M.2 SSD 430S TS512GMTS430S
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Optane 120 GB SSDPEK1W120GA
Average Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
 
Average of class Desktop
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
32%
81%
39%
-34%
35%
24%
19%
Write 4K
114.2
183.3
61%
231.2
102%
178.4
56%
65.9
-42%
133.7
17%
181.8 ?(114.2 - 293, n=3)
59%
141.2 ?(26 - 304, n=28, last 2 years)
24%
Read 4K
46.92
62.2
33%
66.1
41%
61
30%
24.27
-48%
178.6
281%
46.8 ?(31.3 - 62.1, n=3)
0%
45.1 ?(16.3 - 80.4, n=28, last 2 years)
-4%
Write Seq
928.6
976
5%
1942
109%
1040
12%
456.4
-51%
608
-35%
859 ?(459 - 1190, n=3)
-7%
1165 ?(64.6 - 4094, n=25, last 2 years)
25%
Read Seq
838.3
1629
94%
1739
107%
1919
129%
542
-35%
1428
70%
1304 ?(838 - 1792, n=3)
56%
1411 ?(334 - 4099, n=25, last 2 years)
68%
Write 4K Q32T1
220.3
443.1
101%
495.3
125%
417.7
90%
331.3
50%
323.6
47%
347 ?(220 - 499, n=3)
58%
330 ?(28.8 - 788, n=28, last 2 years)
50%
Read 4K Q32T1
316.2
339
7%
648
105%
325.6
3%
295
-7%
282.3
-11%
477 ?(316 - 719, n=3)
51%
382 ?(17.4 - 1020, n=28, last 2 years)
21%
Write Seq Q32T1
1227.2
979
-20%
2055
67%
1144
-7%
506
-59%
627
-49%
960 ?(436 - 1227, n=3)
-22%
1176 ?(59 - 5065, n=28, last 2 years)
-4%
Read Seq Q32T1
2510.5
1837
-27%
2235
-11%
2379
-5%
562
-78%
1521
-39%
2429 ?(2222 - 2554, n=3)
-3%
1890 ?(219 - 6884, n=28, last 2 years)
-25%
AS SSD
11%
68%
-65%
-92%
46%
-34%
-23%
Seq Read
1907.57
1653
-13%
2006
5%
2069
8%
527
-72%
1379
-28%
1779 ?(1451 - 1978, n=3)
-7%
1505 ?(391 - 5397, n=31, last 2 years)
-21%
Seq Write
1039.43
869
-16%
1904
83%
1203
16%
469
-55%
553
-47%
630 ?(308 - 1039, n=3)
-39%
1120 ?(365 - 4006, n=31, last 2 years)
8%
4K Read
43.19
56.4
31%
60.9
41%
41.66
-4%
20.41
-53%
127.9
196%
32.5 ?(24 - 43.2, n=3)
-25%
36.4 ?(10.7 - 83.9, n=31, last 2 years)
-16%
4K Write
57.24
163.7
186%
203.7
256%
136.9
139%
42.52
-26%
103.5
81%
80.4 ?(57.2 - 113.7, n=3)
40%
105.7 ?(30.2 - 308, n=31, last 2 years)
85%
4K-64 Read
772.77
321.8
-58%
740
-4%
366.3
-53%
231.4
-70%
1258
63%
528 ?(257 - 773, n=3)
-32%
581 ?(59.4 - 2283, n=31, last 2 years)
-25%
4K-64 Write
385.27
778
102%
1092
183%
340.5
-12%
285.3
-26%
556
44%
445 ?(243 - 707, n=3)
16%
652 ?(56.3 - 2281, n=31, last 2 years)
69%
Access Time Read *
0.131
0.085
35%
0.047
64%
0.064
51%
0.124
5%
0.025
81%
0.09367 ?(0 - 0.15, n=3)
28%
0.2186 ?(0.045 - 3.63, n=31, last 2 years)
-67%
Access Time Write *
0.03
0.137
-357%
0.083
-177%
0.347
-1057%
0.269
-797%
0.033
-10%
0.1407 ?(0.03 - 0.353, n=3)
-369%
0.1954 ?(0.012 - 0.623, n=31, last 2 years)
-551%
Score Read
1007
544
-46%
1001
-1%
615
-39%
304
-70%
1524
51%
739 ?(478 - 1007, n=3)
-27%
785 ?(51 - 2777, n=31, last 2 years)
-22%
Score Write
546
1028
88%
1486
172%
598
10%
375
-31%
714
31%
588 ?(387 - 832, n=3)
8%
888 ?(52 - 2827, n=31, last 2 years)
63%
Score Total
2035
1833
-10%
3013
48%
1497
-26%
839
-59%
3023
49%
1656 ?(1033 - 2035, n=3)
-19%
2065 ?(142 - 6725, n=31, last 2 years)
1%
Copy ISO MB/s
1018.16
2017
98%
1714
68%
1186
16%
490.9
-52%
1125
10%
648 ?(278 - 1018, n=2)
-36%
1276 ?(54.9 - 3802, n=29, last 2 years)
25%
Copy Program MB/s
378.31
274.7
-27%
357
-6%
428.6
13%
415.9
10%
342.4
-9%
330 ?(282 - 378, n=2)
-13%
362 ?(52.3 - 1191, n=29, last 2 years)
-4%
Copy Game MB/s
322.02
756
135%
1040
223%
435.7
35%
352.3
9%
768
138%
303 ?(284 - 322, n=2)
-6%
741 ?(27.4 - 2579, n=29, last 2 years)
130%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
22% / 18%
75% / 73%
-13% / -27%
-63% / -71%
41% / 42%
-5% / -13%
-2% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2510.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1227.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 316.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 220.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 838.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 928.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.92 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 114.2 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

011523034546057569080592010351150126513801495161017251840195520702185Tooltip
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1: Ø2234 (2060.24-2245.42)
Beelink SER4 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø1407 (1225.09-1439.28)
Beelink GTI 11 Kingston SA2000M8500G: Ø1656 (1490.24-1661.99)

GPU性能

集成的 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655GPU提供了一个比大多数集成图形解决方案更高的水平,但与英特尔较新的 Iris XeiGPU相比,它的年龄明显。它也落后于AMD的Radeon RX VegaiGPU,在大多数基准测试中提供大约一半的性能。虽然Geekom Mini IT8可以处理流媒体和多显示器支持,但有更高图形需求(如照片/视频编辑或3D建模)的用户应该到其他地方去看看。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Time Spy
Time Spy
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike 极端
Fire Strike 极端
Fire Strike 超强
Fire Strike 超强
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Desktop
  (508 - 69481, n=36, last 2 years)
15589 Points ∼100% +438%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, Intel Core i7-8809G
14302 Points ∼92% +393%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
8517 Points ∼55% +194%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
7420 Points ∼48% +156%
Beelink SER4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
6036 Points ∼39% +108%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
5566 Points ∼36% +92%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
5221 Points ∼33% +80%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U
2947 Points ∼19% +2%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U
2900 Points ∼19%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (1365 - 3081, n=7)
2681 Points ∼17% -8%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Desktop
  (378 - 53110, n=39, last 2 years)
11928 Points ∼100% +502%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, Intel Core i7-8809G
10248 Points ∼86% +417%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
5970 Points ∼50% +201%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
4766 Points ∼40% +140%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
4010 Points ∼34% +102%
Beelink SER4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
3927 Points ∼33% +98%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
3152 Points ∼26% +59%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U
1983 Points ∼17%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U
1914 Points ∼16% -3%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (920 - 2260, n=8)
1817 Points ∼15% -8%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, Intel Core i7-8809G
59162 Points ∼100% +288%
Average of class Desktop
  (2453 - 246319, n=33, last 2 years)
37853 Points ∼64% +148%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
27524 Points ∼47% +80%
Beelink SER4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
27339 Points ∼46% +79%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
25008 Points ∼42% +64%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
19330 Points ∼33% +27%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U
15259 Points ∼26%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U
15258 Points ∼26% 0%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (6498 - 16698, n=8)
13736 Points ∼23% -10%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Desktop
  (102 - 21645, n=34, last 2 years)
5281 Points ∼100% +769%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, Intel Core i7-8809G
2908 Points ∼55% +378%
Dell Inspiron 15 5518-2X3JR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
1896 Points ∼36% +212%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
1871 Points ∼35% +208%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
1281 Points ∼24% +111%
Beelink SER4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
1241 Points ∼23% +104%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
1031 Points ∼20% +70%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U
608 Points ∼12%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, Intel Core i5-8259U
594 Points ∼11% -2%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (301 - 633, n=9)
563 Points ∼11% -7%
3DMark 11 Performance
3180 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
91026 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
11875 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1851 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
861 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
692 points
Help

游戏性能

英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655最适合于休闲游戏。在FHD(1920x1080)和低/中设置下,像《火箭联盟》这样的轻型游戏可以达到60FPS。将图形滑块调高会降低帧率,但Mini IT8在大多数竞争性游戏中仍能达到30 FPS以上。

不幸的是,大多数现代AAA级游戏是不能玩的,即使在最低设置下。iGPU根本没有能力推动这些像素。我们还注意到一些游戏(如《古墓丽影》出现了一些奇怪的图形故障,一些游戏(如《DOOM永恒》在没有认真调整的情况下无法启动。我们把这归结为缺乏驱动支持,多年来这一直是困扰英特尔集成GPU的问题。

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
81.8 fps ∼100% +381%
MSI Summit E14 A11SCS
Intel Core i7-1185G7, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
72 fps ∼88% +324%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
69.3 fps ∼85% +308%
Average of class Desktop
  (4.13 - 232, n=27, last 2 years)
48.7 fps ∼60% +186%
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
48.6 fps ∼59% +186%
Beelink SER4
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
37.3 fps ∼46% +119%
Beelink GTI 11
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
36.7 fps ∼45% +116%
Honor MagicBook 16 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
35 fps ∼43% +106%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
33.7 fps ∼41% +98%
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
29.8 fps ∼36% +75%
Intel NUC11TNKi5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
26.8 fps ∼33% +58%
GMK NucBox 2
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
17.3 fps ∼21% +2%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
17 fps ∼21%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (9.11 - 17.3, n=7)
15.3 fps ∼19% -10%
Rocket League
1280x720 Performance
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (78 - 133.3, n=3)
102.8 fps ∼100% +32%
Average of class Desktop
  (56.2 - 94, n=4, last 2 years)
80.3 fps ∼78% +3%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
78 fps ∼76%
1920x1080 Performance
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (60 - 92, n=2)
76 fps ∼100% +27%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
60 fps ∼79%
Average of class Desktop
  (60 - 60, n=3, last 2 years)
60 fps ∼79% 0%
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (40.6 - 59.1, n=3)
48.6 fps ∼100% +6%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
46 fps ∼95%
Average of class Desktop
  (43 - 46.3, n=4, last 2 years)
44.8 fps ∼92% -3%
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
141 (113min - 196max) fps ∼100% +292%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
36 fps ∼26%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (32.7 - 38.8, n=3)
35.8 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Desktop
  (29 - 36, n=4, last 2 years)
31.6 fps ∼22% -12%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Average of class Desktop
  (7 - 248, n=10, last 2 years)
131.3 fps ∼100% +591%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
109 (88min - 171max) fps ∼83% +474%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
85.5 (24min - 151max) fps ∼65% +350%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
  (19 - 22, n=3)
20.5 fps ∼16% +8%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
19 fps ∼14%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average of class Desktop
  (13 - 226, n=11, last 2 years)
127.3 fps ∼100% +879%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
47 (38min - 90max) fps ∼37% +262%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
37.2 (26min - 67max) fps ∼29% +186%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
13 fps ∼10%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
 
13 fps ∼10% 0%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Average of class Desktop
  (8 - 226, n=11, last 2 years)
123.8 fps ∼100% +1448%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK
Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
43 (35min - 78max) fps ∼35% +438%
Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
33.8 (6min - 59max) fps ∼27% +323%
Geekom Mini IT8-GM08i5T
Intel Core i5-8259U, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
8 fps ∼6%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
 
8 fps ∼6% 0%
low med. high ultra
Rocket League (2017) 78 46 36 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 17 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 19 13 8 fps

Emissions

应力测试和温度

在压力下,Geekom Mini IT8由于CPU芯片的高温而出现一些节流现象。运行Prime95一小时后,CPU短暂地提升到3.6GHz,然后又稳定在2.7GHz。然而,CPU上的温度在短暂飙升到102℃后,在85℃左右波动。在运行Furmark一小时后,iGPU管理一个稳定的900MHz,同时在70℃保持稳定。

同时运行Prime 95和Furmark会使CPU慢下来,使其节流到1.0-1.1GHz。iGPU也略微回落到800MHz。在所有三项测试中,CPU都达到了28瓦的额定TDP(尽管在Prime95和Furmark测试开始时有一些短暂的峰值,分别为48和43瓦)。

在我们的压力测试中,机箱的触感越来越热,但从未感到热。这可能是由于侧面的通风口和背面的通风口为机箱提供了大量的空气流通。只要这些气流不受限制,外部温度就不会有问题。有一个单一的风扇,与周围的噪音融为一体,基本上不被注意。它只有在负载下才会升温,即使如此,在正常的坐姿下也很难听到。

丞相95
丞相95
皮尔马克
皮尔马克
Prime95 + Furmark
Prime95 + Furmark

Pros

+ 体积小
+ 合适的CPU性能
+ 安静的风扇
+ 大量的USB 3.2 Gen 2(10 Gbps)端口
+ 几个支持4K60的显示器连接
+ 2个DDR4 SODIMM,PCIe第3代M.2固态硬盘,以及2.5英寸SATA III

Cons

- 老化的芯片组
- 游戏性能不强
- 光滑的塑料机身会留下指纹
- 没有Wi-Fi 6
- 在长时间的压力下,CPU会发热

判决书

Geekom Mini IT8是一款合格的迷你台式机,在它的小机箱里装了不少端口。虽然它不是市场上最小的台式机,但它在一个很小的机箱里有很好的计算能力,很容易被收起来,不被人发现。

亮点包括显示连接套件(据Geekom称,最多支持四台4K60显示器)和其安静的风扇。酷睿i5-8259U和英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655是办公机器或媒体流HTPC的良好组合。大量的10Gpbs USB端口为连接大量高速USB驱动器进行媒体管理提供了选择。

然而,Coffee Lake CPU在这一点上已经是四年前的产品了,而且它显示了这一点。英特尔的Tiger Lake 和Alder Lake芯片提供了明显更好的性能,而较新的芯片组中的英特尔Xe Graphics iGPU在游戏和图形工作方面远远超过了现在的英特尔Iris Plus Graphics 655。不过,以449美元的价格(我们的评测单位),Geekom Mini IT8在提供非常相似的体验的同时,还压低了许多竞争对手。

综上所述,Geekom Mini IT8最适合那些寻找一个既看不见也听不见的小型办公桌的人。对坚实的媒体流媒体PC感兴趣的用户也可能想看看Geekom Mini IT8。

价格和可用性

Geekom Mini IT8可在亚马逊,起价379美元(Core i5-8259U, 8 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD)。我们审查的单位(Core i5-8259U, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD)目前在,售价为449美元。.有兴趣的买家也可以直接从Geekom购买Geekom Mini IT8以同样的价格购买。

Pricecompare

Sam Medley
Editor of the original article: Sam Medley - Senior Tech Writer - 1170 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2016
contact me via: @samuel_medley
Ninh Duy
Translator: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 232897 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Geekom Mini IT8 SFF台式机上手
Sam Medley, 2022-05- 4 (Update: 2022-05- 4)