评语:"刀锋 18 "比以前更好,也比以前更差
Razer 对 Blade 18 进行了大范围的重新设计。不过,新设计包括一个用于冷却系统的凸起,看起来不是特别和谐。不过,散热性能本身是足够的,而且在游戏时,即使在涡轮模式下,新款 Blade 18 也是市场上比较安静的机型之一。RTX 5090 移动 GPU 的性能非常出色,但它不支持 PCIe 5.0。Razer 还配备了专用数字键盘,但由于键程较短,打字体验受到影响。
关于显示屏,我们不确定有多少人会使用 440 Hz 的全高清模式。图像质量略有下降,而在 4K 模式下,你还能获得流畅的 240 Hz 频率。此外,它也不再提供可选的迷你 LED 面板,总体而言,我们认为这对许多用户来说会是一个更好的选择。
总的来说,Blade 18 是一款出色的游戏笔记本,但我们 4899 美元的评测配置肯定不便宜。虽然性能还算不错,但与前代产品相比,它是否真的有所改进还是值得商榷的。 前代产品(显示屏、设计)。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在测试期间,Blade 18 目前在亚马逊上还没有销售。
Razer 对 Blade 18 进行了重大的重新设计,并安装了更强大的散热装置。现在,它还采用了全新的双模 IPS 显示屏,分辨率可从 4K/240 Hz 降为全高清,刷新率提高到 440 Hz。配备 RTX 5070 Ti 移动 GPU 的 Blade 18 起价为 3499 美元。我们的评测配置为 RTX 5090 移动 GPU、64 GB 内存和 4 TB SSD 存储,售价 4899 美元。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能
这款笔记本电脑配备了所有现代标准,如 Thunderbolt 5 和 Wi-Fi 7,但后部没有端口。Wi-Fi 模块提供了良好的传输速度,弹簧式 SD 卡读卡器速度很快,500 万像素网络摄像头(带机械快门和红外模块)拍照效果不错。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (20 - 207, n=72, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=71, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |

可持续性
Razer 没有披露环保认证或使用回收材料的情况。不过,包装是完全可回收的。
输入设备 - 现在配有数字键盘
显示屏 - 双模 440 Hz 4K IPS
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 545 cd/m²
Contrast: 1329:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
97% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
CCT: 7027 K
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop NE180QAM-NZ1, IPS, 3840x2400, 18", 240 Hz | Alienware 18 Area-51 AU Optronics B180QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 300 Hz | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 BOEhydis NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Aorus Master 18 AM8H NE180QDM-NM1 (BOE0C58), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 18", 120 Hz | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 300 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -2% | 1% | 2% | 0% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97 | 96.1 -1% | 97.1 0% | 99.9 3% | 99.7 3% | 99 2% | 99 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89 | 89.7 1% | 84.7 -5% | 87.7 -1% | 90.4 2% | 87.2 -2% | 86.9 -2% |
Response Times | -122% | -35% | -149% | -150% | -86% | -127% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.1 ? | 13 ? -155% | 5.6 ? -10% | 16.4 ? -222% | 8.8 ? -73% | 7.4 ? -45% | 7.6 ? -49% |
Response Time Black / White * | 4.6 ? | 8.7 ? -89% | 7.3 ? -59% | 8.1 ? -76% | 15 ? -226% | 10.4 ? -126% | 14 ? -204% |
PWM Frequency | 1398 ? | 15430 ? | 20610 ? | 26444 ? | |||
PWM Amplitude * | 100 | 50 | 100 | ||||
Screen | -9% | -20% | 38% | -29% | 100% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 545 | 512.5 -6% | 478 -12% | 438 -20% | 704 29% | 764 40% | 605.4 11% |
Brightness | 510 | 496 -3% | 456 -11% | 451 -12% | 680 33% | 747 46% | 600 18% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 94 9% | 89 3% | 90 5% | 88 2% | 93 8% | 97 13% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.41 -0% | 0.4 2% | 0.13 68% | 0.1 76% | 0.62 -51% | |
Contrast | 1329 | 1250 -6% | 1195 -10% | 3369 153% | 7640 475% | 976 -27% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 3.24 -47% | 3.94 -79% | 1.25 43% | 4.11 -87% | 1.2 45% | 1.53 30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 8.4 -45% | 8.6 -48% | 4.93 15% | 6.43 -11% | 2.8 52% | 4.15 28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 0.47 57% | 0.75 32% | 2.5 -127% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 5 -43% | 5.5 -57% | 1.7 51% | 4.9 -40% | 1.5 57% | 2.6 26% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.37 93% | 2.212 99% | 2.173 101% | 2.03 108% | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 7027 93% | 6417 101% | 7059 92% | 6518 100% | 6331 103% | 6556 99% | 6843 95% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -44% /
-23% | -19% /
-18% | -37% /
1% | -59% /
-41% | 5% /
48% | -40% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了分析,但在使用出厂配置文件时遇到了一些问题。除了默认配置文件外,所有配置文件都只覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间,这是不应该的。此外,灰度和色彩偏差(默认设置和 sRGB 设置)都相当大。不过,通过我们的校准,显示效果得到了明显改善。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise | |
↘ 3.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
5.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.3 ms rise | |
↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8287 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 箭湖 HX 和布莱克韦尔
测试条件
Razer Synapse 软件提供了丰富的系统设置和电源配置文件,我们在下面列出了这些设置和配置文件。基准测试在Turbo模式下运行,只有平衡模式在电池供电时可用。
功率曲线 | CPU TDP | CB24 Multi | GPU TGP | Time Spy 图形 | CP 2077 QHD Ultra | 风扇 CP 2077 | 风扇压力测试 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 45/35 瓦 | 1,130 点 | 125 瓦 | 19,875 点 | 91.7 FPS | 38.6 dB(A) | 35.6 dB(A) |
平衡 | 100/90 瓦 | 1,839 分 | 150 瓦 | 23,683 分 | 111.4 FPS | 43.1 dB(A) | 44.1 dB(A) |
性能 | 130/120 瓦 | 1,969 分 | 175 瓦 | 25,155 分 | 118.7 FPS | 48.2 dB(A) | 48.2 dB(A) |
涡轮 | 165/140 瓦 | 2,168 分 | 175 瓦 | 25,198 分 | 118.9 FPS | 48.2 dB(A) | 53.5 dB(A) |
电池(平衡) | 40 瓦 | 1,189 分 | 60 瓦 | 9,744 分 | 34 FPS | 31 dB(A) | 31 dB(A) |
处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HX
Razer 采用最新的 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 275HX、虽然性能非常出色,但并没有充分发挥处理器的潜力。一些竞争对手的处理器速度稍快,但在实际使用中并不会产生真正的差异。与旧款 刀锋 18及其 酷睿 i9-14900HX在所有基准测试中的优势为 20%。在持续负载情况下,CPU 性能保持完全稳定。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Test
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H -2! | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 -2! | |
Average of class Gaming |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1547 - 2288, n=18) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (331 - 2298, n=92, last 2 years) |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (123.1 - 138.2, n=18) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138.2, n=93, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30712 - 40970, n=23) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=149, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2009 - 2267, n=23) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=149, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12026 - 16108, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=148, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (774 - 870, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=148, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4756 - 6271, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=148, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (306 - 343, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=147, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82 - 116, n=21) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (98236 - 124155, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=146, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6026 - 7149, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=146, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=23) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=145, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2856 - 3160, n=23) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3253, n=145, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (19105 - 25855, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=145, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2033 - 2292, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=145, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30.7 - 43.8, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=146, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=144, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (33.2 - 62.1, n=22) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (28067 - 39895, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (140254 - 200744, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=145, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6766 - 9734, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=145, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (113887 - 140937, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (11172 - 14415, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72596 - 104217, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (107195 - 136847, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 241777, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1599 - 2263, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=145, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14847 - 21542, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (37482 - 62916, n=22) | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=145, last 2 years) |
系统性能
毫不奇怪,Blade 18 是一款速度非常快的电脑,我们在测试期间没有遇到任何稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 -1! | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (8221 - 9497, n=10) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=129, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9994 - 11369, n=10) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9122 - 10925, n=10) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (14493 - 19234, n=10) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=129, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1995 - 2339, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=114, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1847 - 2211, n=10) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=114, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2170 - 2642, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=114, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1673 - 2217, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=114, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (315 - 362, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=125, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (313 - 341, n=9) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=114, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (402 - 424, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8221 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (56003 - 94460, n=22) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=145, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (55795 - 97151, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=145, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (55663 - 106063, n=22) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 161.6, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
Blade 18 为双面硬盘提供了两个 M.2 2280 插槽,我们的评测机还配备了两个 2 TB Lexar 固态硬盘。PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘性能良好,但 Razer 没有提供 PCIe 5.0。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
刀锋 18 配备了最快的 175 瓦版 GeForce RTX 5090 移动 GPU.无论是在合成测试还是在玩游戏时,GPU 的性能都非常出色。在 4K 显示屏上,您可以看到与 RTX 5080 移动 GPU 的性能优势。它还能更好地利用 GPU,尽管有些游戏在不进行升频的情况下要求过高(如《F1 25》)。在持续负载下,GPU 性能保持完全稳定。
3DMark 11 Performance | 48598 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 40595 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 23241 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 6304 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 27000 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 27266 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=141, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9 - 18, n=15) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=141, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 37, n=13) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (123 - 259, n=15) | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 166.5, n=131, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=130, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 120.5, n=18) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 120.5, n=112, last 2 years) |
F1 25 - 2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (30.9 - 37.5, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (5 - 37.5, n=15, last 2 years) |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (92 - 136, n=7) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average of class Gaming (60 - 131, n=15, last 2 years) |
Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High | |
Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (37 - 64, n=14) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average of class Gaming (25 - 64, n=37, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 166.2 | 165.6 | 176.1 | |||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 223 | 196.6 | 190.2 | 175.5 | 174 | |||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 232 | 230 | 215 | 181 | 109.2 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 160 | 159.9 | 122.1 | 95.6 | ||||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 643 | 509 | 485 | 453 | 345 | 179.3 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 274 | 244 | 213.5 | 213 | 161.5 | 89.8 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 186 | 185 | 174.5 | 163.4 | 132.4 | 118.9 | 54.7 | |
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 123.4 | 119.6 | 116.1 | 91.4 | 49.6 | |||
F1 24 (2024) | 301 | 299 | 281 | 144.9 | 141.8 | 103.6 | 89.2 | 52.3 |
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 205 | 194 | 169 | 162 | 131 | 60 | ||
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 115 | 109 | 95 | 75 | 63 | 46 | ||
F1 25 (2025) | 240 | 226 | 217 | 62.3 | 67.5 | 37.5 | 34.1 | 17.8 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.4 / 23.4 / 23.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 40.4 / 53.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB | Alienware 18 Area-51 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB | Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G | MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0) | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -13% | -29% | -17% | -17% | -14% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 23.4 | 23.4 -0% | 25 -7% | 25 -7% | 25.56 -9% | 23.3 -0% | 23.4 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.4 | 30.2 -29% | 25 -7% | 26 -11% | 27.68 -18% | 29.8 -27% | 23.9 -2% |
Idle Average * | 23.4 | 30.6 -31% | 39 -67% | 29 -24% | 27.68 -18% | 29.8 -27% | 28.2 -21% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.4 | 30.6 -31% | 42 -79% | 34 -45% | 31.54 -35% | 29.8 -27% | 29 -24% |
Load Average * | 40.4 | 38 6% | 52 -29% | 50 -24% | 44 -9% | 42.9 -6% | 36.8 9% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48.2 | 48.9 -1% | 53 -10% | 52 -8% | 58.7 -22% | 53.7 -11% | |
Load Maximum * | 53.5 | 55.9 -4% | 55 -3% | 53 1% | 58.9 -10% | 53.7 -0% | 61.1 -14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105.1 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.7 °C / -21.1 F).
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Alienware 18 Area-51 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 2% | -12% | -21% | -30% | -6% | -16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.3 | 36.8 17% | 47 -6% | 50 -13% | 48.2 -9% | 45.6 -3% | 43.2 2% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 35.8 15% | 48 -14% | 46 -10% | 53.6 -28% | 46 -10% | 42.6 -1% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.2 | 30.6 -13% | 29 -7% | 36 -32% | 37.2 -37% | 28.9 -6% | 36 -32% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.5 | 30.8 -12% | 33 -20% | 35 -27% | 40.4 -47% | 29.2 -6% | 36.4 -32% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
音响系统由 6 个模块组成(2 个高音扬声器、4 个低音扬声器),总体而言,音质非常出色。不过,这也是 前代表现略胜一筹。
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Alienware 18 Area-51 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB | Alienware 18 Area-51 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB | Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G | MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0) | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -51% | 28% | -20% | -4% | -13% | -35% | |
Idle Minimum * | 18.1 | 38.4 -112% | 7.9 56% | 29 -60% | 19.01 -5% | 11.4 37% | 25.4 -40% |
Idle Average * | 27.9 | 45.6 -63% | 11.5 59% | 33 -18% | 30.92 -11% | 39.2 -41% | 37.7 -35% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.7 | 57.5 -100% | 16.6 42% | 48 -67% | 33.84 -18% | 40.2 -40% | 57.9 -102% |
Load Average * | 108.3 | 190.1 -76% | 130 -20% | 141 -30% | 105.4 3% | 161.2 -49% | 128.4 -19% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 338 | 340 -1% | 253 25% | 283 16% | 343 -1% | 303 10% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 331 | 333 -1% | 245 26% | 283 15% | 330 -0% | 295 11% | |
Load Maximum * | 366.7 | 373.2 -2% | 330 10% | 340 7% | 354 3% | 430.9 -18% | 297.9 19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 273.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
- 07/14/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.