Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

速度极快但相对安静的游戏玩家 - Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

440 赫兹双模式显示屏。

Razer 的新款 Blade 18 2025 配备了GeForce RTX 5090 移动 GPU 和支持高达 440 Hz 的双模显示屏,旨在提供最高的游戏性能。改进后的散热效果令人印象深刻,Blade 18 是游戏时较为安静的机型之一。然而,新的设计并没有真正击中要害。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

评语:"刀锋 18 "比以前更好,也比以前更差

Razer 对 Blade 18 进行了大范围的重新设计。不过,新设计包括一个用于冷却系统的凸起,看起来不是特别和谐。不过,散热性能本身是足够的,而且在游戏时,即使在涡轮模式下,新款 Blade 18 也是市场上比较安静的机型之一。RTX 5090 移动 GPU 的性能非常出色,但它不支持 PCIe 5.0。Razer 还配备了专用数字键盘,但由于键程较短,打字体验受到影响。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

关于显示屏,我们不确定有多少人会使用 440 Hz 的全高清模式。图像质量略有下降,而在 4K 模式下,你还能获得流畅的 240 Hz 频率。此外,它也不再提供可选的迷你 LED 面板,总体而言,我们认为这对许多用户来说会是一个更好的选择。

总的来说,Blade 18 是一款出色的游戏笔记本,但我们 4899 美元的评测配置肯定不便宜。虽然性能还算不错,但与前代产品相比,它是否真的有所改进还是值得商榷的。 前代产品(显示屏、设计)。

Pros

+ 优质稳定的金属外壳
+ 强力散热
+ 极高的游戏性能
+ 雷电 5 和 Wi-Fi 7
+ 良好的维护选项
+ 电池寿命长
+ 良好的 240 Hz 4K IPS 显示屏
+ 440 赫兹模式

Cons

- 440 Hz 时图像质量下降
- 低调旅行
- 没有 PCIe 5.0
- 不再提供微型 LED 选件

价格和供应情况

在测试期间,Blade 18 目前在亚马逊上还没有销售。

Amazon Logo
$3,149.00
Razer Blade 17 Gaming Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti - 12th Gen Intel 14-Core i7 CPU - 17.3" QHD 240Hz - 16GB DDR5 RAM, 1TB PCIe SSD - Windows 11 - Chroma RGB - Thunderbolt 4 - SD Card Reader
  • $4,069.00
    Razer Blade Pro 17 Gaming Laptop 2020: Intel Core i7-10875H 8-Core, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super, 17.3" 4K 120Hz, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, CNC, Chroma RGB, Thunderbolt 3, SD Card Reader, Creator Ready
  • $4,699.99
    Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090-13th Gen Intel 24-Core i9 HX CPU - 18" QHD+ 240Hz - 32GB RAM - 2TB SSD - CNC Aluminum - Compact GaN Charger - Windows 11 - Chroma RGB

Razer 对 Blade 18 进行了重大的重新设计,并安装了更强大的散热装置。现在,它还采用了全新的双模 IPS 显示屏,分辨率可从 4K/240 Hz 降为全高清,刷新率提高到 440 Hz。配备 RTX 5070 Ti 移动 GPU 的 Blade 18 起价为 3499 美元。我们的评测配置为 RTX 5090 移动 GPU、64 GB 内存和 4 TB SSD 存储,售价 4899 美元。

规格

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop (Blade 18 2025 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 165 W PL2 / Short Burst, 140 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 2640 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 150 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 576.80, Advanced Optimus
Memory
64 GB 
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel, 2 slots
Display
18.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 252 PPI, NE180QAM-NZ1, IPS, 440 Hz in FHD, glossy: no, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)
Storage
Lexar NM790 2TB, 2048 GB 
, 2x 2TB, 3666 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Arrow Lake-S PCH - ACE (Audio Context Engine)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC (UHS-II)
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27.9 x 400 x 275.4
Battery
99.99 Wh, 6565 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 5 MP with Shutter + IR
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 6 module (2 tweeters, 4 woofers), Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 400W PSU, Razer Synapse, Xbox Game Pass PC (1 month), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
3.173 kg, Power Supply: 1.087 kg
Price
5 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和功能

Razer 重新设计了机箱,虽然乍看之下设计没有变化,但变化非常明显,尤其是底部。现在,散热系统有了一个明显的凸起,加上支架,几乎和一些超极本一样高。凸起的中央还有一个观察窗,但只能看到印刷的蒸汽室。我们认为,这个凸起有损 Blade 18 的视觉设计。

金属机身的质量依然很好,铰链(最大开启角度 135 度)也调整得很好。黑色表面仍然容易沾染指纹,但底座和盖子很容易清洁。Razer 取消了大量照明,只有徽标、观察窗和键盘有照明。

冷却系统的新隆起
冷却系统的新隆起
这使得表壳显得厚重。
这使得表壳显得厚重。
凸起和支架几乎和一些子笔记本电脑一样高。
凸起和支架几乎和一些子笔记本电脑一样高。

这款笔记本电脑配备了所有现代标准,如 Thunderbolt 5 和 Wi-Fi 7,但后部没有端口。Wi-Fi 模块提供了良好的传输速度,弹簧式 SD 卡读卡器速度很快,500 万像素网络摄像头(带机械快门和红外模块)拍照效果不错。

尺寸比较

408 mm 300 mm 30.4 mm 3.6 kg404 mm 307.5 mm 32.05 mm 3.6 kg410 mm 320 mm 24.32 mm 4.2 kg401 mm 287 mm 31 mm 3.4 kg399 mm 298 mm 32 mm 3.3 kg400 mm 275.4 mm 27.9 mm 3.2 kg399.9 mm 275.4 mm 21.9 mm 3.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
左:充电器、2.5 GB/秒以太网、2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10 Gbit/秒)、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 4.0(40 GBit/秒、通过 iGPU 传输的 DisplayPort 2.1、Power Delivery 3.0)、3.5 毫米音频插孔
左:充电器、2.5 GB/秒以太网、2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10 Gbit/秒)、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 4.0(40 GBit/秒、通过 iGPU 传输的 DisplayPort 2.1、Power Delivery 3.0)、3.5 毫米音频插孔
右侧SD 读卡器、USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 5(120 GBit/s、DisplayPort 2.1(通过 dGPU)、Power Delivery 3.0)、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10 GBit/s)、HDMI 2.1、Kensington 安全插槽
右侧SD 读卡器、USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 5(120 GBit/s、DisplayPort 2.1(通过 dGPU)、Power Delivery 3.0)、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2(10 GBit/s)、HDMI 2.1、Kensington 安全插槽
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
207 MB/s
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202.7 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
191 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188.25 MB/s -9%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
186 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 207, n=72, last 2 years)
106.8 MB/s -48%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
72.7 (55.82min - 73.14max) MB/s -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
225.3 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
220.56 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
214.3 MB/s
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
202 MB/s -6%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
192 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 261, n=71, last 2 years)
136.7 MB/s -36%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
91.91 MB/s -57%
Networking
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1524 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1491 (min: 1392) MBit/s ∼86%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1472 (min: 1259) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1393 (min: 1267) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1449 (min: 1186) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1480 (min: 1367) MBit/s ∼86%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
967 (min: 384) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1604 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼92%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1342 (min: 1027) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1736 (min: 1712) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1490 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1696 (min: 869) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1556 (min: 809) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1723 (min: 1677) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1660 (min: 1544) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1588 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼91%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1143 (min: 813) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1459 (min: 1375) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1199 (min: 1057) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1315 (min: 1269) MBit/s ∼76%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1524 (1324-1661)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1491 (1392-1518)
ColorChecker
18.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: 11.32 ∆E min: 1.53 - max: 20.26 ∆E

维护

维护选项非常不错,包括两个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘、Wi-Fi 适配器和两个内存模块。

内部布局
内部布局
两块 M.2 2280 固态硬盘之一和 Wi-Fi 适配器
两块 M.2 2280 固态硬盘之一和 Wi-Fi 适配器
2x SO-DIMM
2x SO-DIMM

可持续性

Razer 没有披露环保认证或使用回收材料的情况。不过,包装是完全可回收的。

输入设备 - 现在配有数字键盘

Razer 配备了黑色键盘和专用数字键盘。不过,它的键程相对较短,特别是考虑到机身较厚。虽然按键非常精确,但对于一款高端设备来说,整体键入感觉并不尽如人意。灯光可以进行多种配置(每个键都可以)。宽大的玻璃点击板(15 x 9.8 厘米)具有出色的滑动性能,下部区域的机械点击非常安静,质量上乘。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

显示屏 - 双模 440 Hz 4K IPS

子像素排列
子像素排列
尽量减少漏光
尽量减少漏光

雷蛇为新款 Blade 18 专门配备了哑光双模 IPS 显示屏。分辨率为 3,840 x 2,400 像素,刷新率为 240 Hz,但可以选择将显示屏切换为 1,920 x 1,200 像素,刷新率更高达 440 Hz(不过需要重新启动)。缩放比例不会自动调整,因此图像质量会受到一定影响。哑光面板给人的主观印象不错,即使是明亮的区域也不会出现颗粒感;但色彩不如 OLED 屏幕鲜艳。没有 PWM 闪烁,响应时间也很快。最大亮度平均为 510 cd/m²。黑色水平略高,为 0.41 cd/m²,这就是对比度 "只有 "约 1,300:1 的原因。

471
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NE180QAM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 545 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 509.7 cd/m² Minimum: 29.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 545 cd/m²
Contrast: 1329:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
97% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
CCT: 7027 K
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
NE180QAM-NZ1, IPS, 3840x2400, 18", 240 Hz
Alienware 18 Area-51
AU Optronics B180QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 300 Hz
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
BOEhydis NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
NE180QDM-NM1 (BOE0C58), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 18", 120 Hz
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 300 Hz
Display
0%
-2%
1%
2%
0%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
97
96.1
-1%
97.1
0%
99.9
3%
99.7
3%
99
2%
99
2%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
99.9
0%
100
0%
99.9
0%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
89
89.7
1%
84.7
-5%
87.7
-1%
90.4
2%
87.2
-2%
86.9
-2%
Response Times
-122%
-35%
-149%
-150%
-86%
-127%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5.1 ?(2.3, 2.8)
13 ?(5.8, 7.2)
-155%
5.6 ?(2.7, 2.9)
-10%
16.4 ?(16.4)
-222%
8.8 ?(3.8, 5)
-73%
7.4 ?(2.4, 5)
-45%
7.6 ?(3.6, 4)
-49%
Response Time Black / White *
4.6 ?(1.5, 3.1)
8.7 ?(4.4, 4.3)
-89%
7.3 ?(2.2, 5.1)
-59%
8.1 ?(8.1)
-76%
15 ?(8.8, 6.2)
-226%
10.4 ?(0.6, 9.8)
-126%
14 ?(6.6, 7.4)
-204%
PWM Frequency
1398 ?(100)
15430 ?(100)
20610 ?(100)
26444 ?(100)
PWM Amplitude *
100
50
100
Screen
-9%
-20%
38%
-29%
100%
6%
Brightness middle
545
512.5
-6%
478
-12%
438
-20%
704
29%
764
40%
605.4
11%
Brightness
510
496
-3%
456
-11%
451
-12%
680
33%
747
46%
600
18%
Brightness Distribution
86
94
9%
89
3%
90
5%
88
2%
93
8%
97
13%
Black Level *
0.41
0.41
-0%
0.4
2%
0.13
68%
0.1
76%
0.62
-51%
Contrast
1329
1250
-6%
1195
-10%
3369
153%
7640
475%
976
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.2
3.24
-47%
3.94
-79%
1.25
43%
4.11
-87%
1.2
45%
1.53
30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
8.4
-45%
8.6
-48%
4.93
15%
6.43
-11%
2.8
52%
4.15
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.1
0.47
57%
0.75
32%
2.5
-127%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.5
5
-43%
5.5
-57%
1.7
51%
4.9
-40%
1.5
57%
2.6
26%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.37 93%
2.212 99%
2.173 101%
2.03 108%
2.17 101%
2.22 99%
CCT
7027 93%
6417 101%
7059 92%
6518 100%
6331 103%
6556 99%
6843 95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-44% / -23%
-19% / -18%
-37% / 1%
-59% / -41%
5% / 48%
-40% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:默认,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:默认,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:默认,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:默认,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:默认,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:默认,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:sRGB,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了分析,但在使用出厂配置文件时遇到了一些问题。除了默认配置文件外,所有配置文件都只覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间,这是不应该的。此外,灰度和色彩偏差(默认设置和 sRGB 设置)都相当大。不过,通过我们的校准,显示效果得到了明显改善。

CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:校准,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 灰度(配置文件:校准,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:校准,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN 饱和度(配置文件:校准,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:校准,目标色彩空间:P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(配置文件:校准,目标色彩空间:P3)
对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 3.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.3 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8287 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下
在阳光下
室外(明亮的白天,无阳光直射)
室外(明亮的白天,无阳光直射)
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 箭湖 HX 和布莱克韦尔

 
 

测试条件

Razer Synapse 软件提供了丰富的系统设置和电源配置文件,我们在下面列出了这些设置和配置文件。基准测试在Turbo模式下运行,只有平衡模式在电池供电时可用。

功率曲线 CPU TDP CB24 Multi GPU TGP Time Spy 图形 CP 2077 QHD Ultra 风扇 CP 2077 风扇压力测试
静音 45/35 瓦 1,130 点 125 瓦 19,875 点 91.7 FPS 38.6 dB(A) 35.6 dB(A)
平衡 100/90 瓦 1,839 分 150 瓦 23,683 分 111.4 FPS 43.1 dB(A) 44.1 dB(A)
性能 130/120 瓦 1,969 分 175 瓦 25,155 分 118.7 FPS 48.2 dB(A) 48.2 dB(A)
涡轮 165/140 瓦 2,168 分 175 瓦 25,198 分 118.9 FPS 48.2 dB(A) 53.5 dB(A)
电池(平衡) 40 瓦 1,189 分 60 瓦 9,744 分 34 FPS 31 dB(A) 31 dB(A)

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HX

Razer 采用最新的 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 275HX、虽然性能非常出色,但并没有充分发挥处理器的潜力。一些竞争对手的处理器速度稍快,但在实际使用中并不会产生真正的差异。与旧款 刀锋 18及其 酷睿 i9-14900HX在所有基准测试中的优势为 20%。在持续负载情况下,CPU 性能保持完全稳定。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Test

03156309451260157518902205252028353150346537804095441047255040535556705985Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5669 (5617.98-5714.29)
Alienware 18 Area-51 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5784 (5592.06-5827.51)
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø4232 (4107.2-4852.6)
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø4952 (4898.36-5043.5)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX: Ø6132 (6018.66-6231.5)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5942 (5879.76-6059.69)
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4163 (3956.09-4227.88)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
86.6 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
86.4 pt
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
83.9 pt
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
83 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
 
80.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
75.1 pt
Aorus Master 18 AM8H -2!
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
75 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 -2!
Intel Core i9-14900HX
68.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63.1 pt
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2298 Points +6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2223 Points +3%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2210 Points +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2168 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (1547 - 2288, n=18)
2015 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
1597 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (331 - 2298, n=92, last 2 years)
1417 Points -35%
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
138 Points +4%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
134.7 Points +1%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
134.2 Points +1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (123.1 - 138.2, n=18)
133.5 Points 0%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
133.1 Points
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
132 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (68.2 - 138.2, n=93, last 2 years)
119.8 Points -10%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
40117 Points +8%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
39001 Points +5%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
38431 (37240.9min - 38430.9max) Points +4%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
37062 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (30712 - 40970, n=23)
35706 Points -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
33497 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
31513 Points -15%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27657 (23328.1min - 27657.5max) Points -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 40970, n=149, last 2 years)
24460 Points -34%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2254 Points +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2252 Points +3%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2194 Points
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2192 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2009 - 2267, n=23)
2188 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2185 Points 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2126 Points -3%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2088 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2267, n=149, last 2 years)
1961 Points -11%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
15751 Points +9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15517 Points +7%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15149 Points +5%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
14483 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (12026 - 16108, n=22)
13983 Points -3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
13223 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
12302 Points -15%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10871 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 16108, n=148, last 2 years)
9402 Points -35%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
866 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
863 Points +3%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
842 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
841 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (774 - 870, n=22)
841 Points 0%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
838 Points
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
821 Points -2%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
814 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 870, n=148, last 2 years)
754 Points -10%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
6232 (6018.66min - 6231.5max) Points +9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6060 (5879.76min - 6059.69max) Points +6%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5828 (5592.06min - 5827.51max) Points +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5714 (5617.98min - 5714.29max) Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (4756 - 6271, n=22)
5580 Points -2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5044 (4898.36min - 5043.5max) Points -12%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
4853 (4107.2min - 4852.6max) Points -15%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4228 (3956.09min - 4227.88max) Points -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1537 - 6271, n=148, last 2 years)
3782 Points -34%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
343 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
336 Points +3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
331 Points +1%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
331 Points +1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (306 - 343, n=23)
330 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
327 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
324 Points -1%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
304 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 343, n=147, last 2 years)
290 Points -11%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (80 - 517, n=144, last 2 years)
158.2 Seconds * -78%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
117 Seconds * -31%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
116 Seconds * -30%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
101 Seconds * -13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (82 - 116, n=21)
95.6 Seconds * -7%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
89 Seconds *
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
88 Seconds * +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
87 Seconds * +2%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
83 Seconds * +7%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
128778 MIPS +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
122818 MIPS +2%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
121759 MIPS +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
120234 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (98236 - 124155, n=22)
113264 MIPS -6%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
109737 MIPS -9%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
107527 MIPS -11%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
99248 MIPS -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 148086, n=146, last 2 years)
89934 MIPS -25%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
7073 MIPS +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
7027 MIPS +7%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
6822 MIPS +4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6822 MIPS +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (6026 - 7149, n=22)
6660 MIPS +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6588 MIPS
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6585 MIPS 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6497 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7508, n=146, last 2 years)
6373 MIPS -3%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
22104 Points +6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
21668 Points +4%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
20819 Points
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19869 Points -5%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19464 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (16033 - 21668, n=23)
19363 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
17510 Points -16%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17231 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 22104, n=145, last 2 years)
15364 Points -26%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3158 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3129 Points +5%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
3088 Points +3%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3057 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2856 - 3160, n=23)
3034 Points +2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3033 Points +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2986 Points
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2842 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3253, n=145, last 2 years)
2759 Points -8%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
27010 Points +8%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
25855 Points +3%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
25068 Points
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
23447 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (19105 - 25855, n=22)
22809 Points -9%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
22794 Points -9%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19310 Points -23%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19105 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 27010, n=145, last 2 years)
16384 Points -35%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2292 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2263 Points +2%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2233 Points +1%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
2232 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2217 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2033 - 2292, n=22)
2199 Points -1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2186 Points -1%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2015 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=145, last 2 years)
1985 Points -10%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
44.3 fps +12%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
41.2 fps +4%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
40.5 fps +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
39.7 fps
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (30.7 - 43.8, n=22)
37.9 fps -5%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
35.7 fps -10%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
32.6 fps -18%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27.7 fps -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (7.7 - 44.3, n=146, last 2 years)
26.4 fps -34%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
62.1 s * -57%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
48.5 s * -23%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
47.7 s * -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=144, last 2 years)
47.7 s * -21%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
47.4 s * -20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (33.2 - 62.1, n=22)
41.5 s * -5%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
41.3 s * -5%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
39.5 s *
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
37.4 s * +5%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3551 - 0.759, n=147, last 2 years)
0.4302 sec * -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=22)
0.4182 sec * -0%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4174 sec *
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4139 sec * +1%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4088 sec * +2%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
0.4012 sec * +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.4012 sec * +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.3943 sec * +6%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3937 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
300 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
5714 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
327 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
14483 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
838 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
37062 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2194 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
133.1 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
2168 Points
Help
Performance Rating
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
99.2 pt
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
96.3 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
95.1 pt
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
90.4 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
 
87.3 pt
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
81.9 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
72.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
42341 KRay/s +21%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
39458 KRay/s +13%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
39149 KRay/s +12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (28067 - 39895, n=22)
35498 KRay/s +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
35004 KRay/s
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
32615 KRay/s -7%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
29330 KRay/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (7192 - 85542, n=145, last 2 years)
27148 KRay/s -22%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
25098 KRay/s -28%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
210885 Points +9%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
200744 Points +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
194867 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
192982 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (140254 - 200744, n=22)
179226 Points -7%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
166245 Points -14%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
140254 Points -27%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
128369 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (35040 - 252486, n=145, last 2 years)
123464 Points -36%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9815 MB/s +9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9482 MB/s +6%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9479 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
8964 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (6766 - 9734, n=22)
8608 MB/s -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
7829 MB/s -13%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
6998 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6159 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (1728 - 10389, n=145, last 2 years)
5651 MB/s -37%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
141681 Points +4%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
140937 Points +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
139608 Points +3%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136621 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
135851 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (113887 - 140937, n=22)
133502 Points -2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
125013 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=145, last 2 years)
118450 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
113887 Points -16%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15500 Points +14%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
14431 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (5020 - 33636, n=145, last 2 years)
14162 Points +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
14112 Points +3%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
13997 Points +3%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
13643 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (11172 - 14415, n=22)
13443 Points -1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
13238 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
11172 Points -18%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
108922 Points +12%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
104217 Points +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
104057 Points +7%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
96990 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (72596 - 104217, n=22)
93406 Points -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
87156 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
72596 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (17585 - 134044, n=145, last 2 years)
63384 Points -35%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
62867 Points -35%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
134920 MB/s +3%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
134887 MB/s +3%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
134195 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
131331 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (107195 - 136847, n=22)
127258 MB/s -3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
119356 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
117887 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 241777, n=145, last 2 years)
109401 MB/s -17%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
107858 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2267 MB/s +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2220 MB/s +5%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2188 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2109 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (1599 - 2263, n=22)
2033 MB/s -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
1898 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1794 MB/s -15%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
1757 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2531, n=145, last 2 years)
1495 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
22312 KRay/s +17%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
21542 KRay/s +13%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
21372 KRay/s +12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (14847 - 21542, n=22)
19123 KRay/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
19038 KRay/s
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
17631 KRay/s -7%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
14847 KRay/s -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (3856 - 45446, n=145, last 2 years)
14551 KRay/s -24%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13680 KRay/s -28%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
62916 MPixel/s +11%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
62274 MPixel/s +10%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
56818 MPixel/s
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
56601 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (37482 - 62916, n=22)
50306 MPixel/s -11%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
49511 MPixel/s -13%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
49353 MPixel/s -13%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
47472 MPixel/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 62916, n=145, last 2 years)
42445 MPixel/s -25%

系统性能

毫不奇怪,Blade 18 是一款速度非常快的电脑,我们在测试期间没有遇到任何稳定性问题。

Performance Rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
91.6 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
85.4 pt
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
85.2 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
85 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
 
85 pt
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
84 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
80.9 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
77.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
76.1 pt
PCMark 10 / Score
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
9497 Points +16%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
8805 Points +7%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
8795 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (8221 - 9497, n=10)
8687 Points +6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
8623 Points +5%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
8608 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
8378 Points +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
8221 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=129, last 2 years)
8040 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
11378 Points +6%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
11081 Points +4%
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
11062 Points +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
10966 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (9994 - 11369, n=10)
10913 Points +2%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
10903 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years)
10769 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
10688 Points
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
10423 Points -2%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
10925 Points +12%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
10186 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=129, last 2 years)
9844 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
9732 Points
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
9704 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
9594 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (9122 - 10925, n=10)
9582 Points -2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
9444 Points -3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
9304 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
19234 Points +33%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
17647 Points +22%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (14493 - 19234, n=10)
17076 Points +18%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
16802 Points +16%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
16788 Points +16%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
15985 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
15780 Points +9%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
14493 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (7440 - 19351, n=129, last 2 years)
13465 Points -7%
CrossMark / Overall
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
2339 Points +3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2282 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
2269 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
2223 Points -2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2221 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (1995 - 2339, n=10)
2203 Points -3%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
2048 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=114, last 2 years)
1979 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
1857 Points -18%
CrossMark / Productivity
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
2211 Points +7%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2119 Points +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
2069 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (1847 - 2211, n=10)
2044 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2025 Points -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
1999 Points -3%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
1902 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2211, n=114, last 2 years)
1862 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
1764 Points -15%
CrossMark / Creativity
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
2688 Points +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
2642 Points
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2606 Points -1%
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
2519 Points -5%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2496 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (2170 - 2642, n=10)
2491 Points -6%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
2316 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2729, n=114, last 2 years)
2201 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
2115 Points -20%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
2217 Points +17%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2181 Points +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (1673 - 2217, n=10)
1917 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
1897 Points
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1813 Points -4%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
1765 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=114, last 2 years)
1744 Points -8%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
1728 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
1466 Points -23%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
362 Points +3%
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
362 Points +3%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
351 Points
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
346 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (315 - 362, n=10)
344 Points -2%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
339 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
339 Points -3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
315 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (237 - 532, n=125, last 2 years)
313 Points -11%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
341 Points +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
335 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (313 - 341, n=9)
329 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
323 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
319 Points
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
317 Points -1%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
316 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 341, n=114, last 2 years)
280 Points -12%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming
  (397 - 674, n=136, last 2 years)
480 ms * -17%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
449 ms * -9%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
420 ms * -2%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
419 ms * -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (402 - 424, n=10)
412 ms * -0%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
411 ms *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
409 ms * -0%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
408 ms * +1%
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
402 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8221 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
94460 MB/s +12%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
93933 MB/s +11%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84432 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84391 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (56003 - 94460, n=22)
79700 MB/s -6%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
77676 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
76268 MB/s -10%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
74558 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 - 97515, n=145, last 2 years)
70033 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97209 MB/s +15%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
96990 MB/s +14%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
86217 MB/s +2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
86194 MB/s +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (55795 - 97151, n=22)
84905 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84719 MB/s
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
82992 MB/s -2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
74094 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (22956 - 104349, n=145, last 2 years)
73202 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
105456 MB/s
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
90726 MB/s -14%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
89392 MB/s -15%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82198 MB/s -22%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (55663 - 106063, n=22)
79771 MB/s -24%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
77640 MB/s -26%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
72929 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (22297 - 133486, n=145, last 2 years)
72121 MB/s -32%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67801 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
125.1 ns * -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (105.8 - 161.6, n=22)
118.4 ns * -1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
116.8 ns *
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
114.2 ns * +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
110.4 ns * +5%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
108.9 ns * +7%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
104.8 ns * +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=145, last 2 years)
100.6 ns * +14%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
87.6 ns * +25%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频软件时显示出轻微的限制。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
11799 μs * -1198%
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
4449.9 μs * -390%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2122.9 μs * -134%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
1479.7 μs * -63%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
1398.5 μs * -54%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
908.7 μs *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
810 μs * +11%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

Blade 18 为双面硬盘提供了两个 M.2 2280 插槽,我们的评测机还配备了两个 2 TB Lexar 固态硬盘。PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘性能良好,但 Razer 没有提供 PCIe 5.0。

Lexar NM790 2TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6960 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6482 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1244 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 1018 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 76.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1374 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 3224 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
87.3 pt
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
72.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
61.4 pt
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
56.5 pt
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
 
56.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
50 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
49.9 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
44.7 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
43.7 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
42.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
8300 (7871.23min - 8300.49max) MB/s +102%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
5861 (5825.98min - 5861.12max) MB/s +43%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
4598 (4514.74min - 4598.04max) MB/s +12%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
4436 (4223.24min - 4435.83max) MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
4102 (3686.13min - 4101.79max) MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
4102 MB/s 0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
3799 (23.02min - 3799.36max) MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
3560 (3002.28min - 3559.93max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (281 - 8300, n=129, last 2 years)
3483 MB/s -15%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
281 (131.86min - 280.81max) MB/s -93%
seq write
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
9699 (9652.56min - 9698.6max) MB/s +112%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
5665 (5398.49min - 5664.61max) MB/s +24%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
4576 (4478.11min - 4575.64max) MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
4576 MB/s 0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
4437 (4373.88min - 4437.36max) MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
4387 (4285.53min - 4387.28max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 9699, n=129, last 2 years)
4017 MB/s -12%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
3688 (3107.22min - 3688.43max) MB/s -19%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
3460 (2896.8min - 3460.09max) MB/s -24%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
3367 (3255.82min - 3366.95max) MB/s -26%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
15056 (12154.1min - 15056max) MB/s +117%
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
13801 (12080.4min - 13801.4max) MB/s +99%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
13091 (10532.2min - 13090.8max) MB/s +89%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
12470 (11207.2min - 12469.7max) MB/s +80%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
9937 (8400.54min - 9936.52max) MB/s +43%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
7041 (6553.91min - 7041.4max) MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
6942 (5111.86min - 6941.99max) MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
6942 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
6797 (5573.18min - 6797.33max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2605 - 15056, n=129, last 2 years)
6727 MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 write
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
12495 (12375.7min - 12494.8max) MB/s +122%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
8988 (8900.34min - 8988.45max) MB/s +59%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
8696 (8611.54min - 8696.26max) MB/s +54%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
8173 (7220.11min - 8172.82max) MB/s +45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
7264 (5656.44min - 7264.06max) MB/s +29%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
6687 (6635.39min - 6687.03max) MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
5639 (5290.9min - 5638.82max) MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
5639 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1281 - 13519, n=129, last 2 years)
5353 MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
4902 (4309.42min - 4901.73max) MB/s -13%
4k q1 t1 read
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
110.2 (96.01min - 110.18max) MB/s +56%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
84.2 (81.84min - 84.15max) MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
77.4 (77.02min - 77.43max) MB/s +9%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
74.5 (73.98min - 74.53max) MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
70.7 (69.52min - 70.73max) MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
70.7 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.2 - 110.2, n=129, last 2 years)
69 MB/s -2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
63.4 (62.2min - 63.4max) MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
61.8 (61.2min - 61.81max) MB/s -13%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
60.8 (60.51min - 60.8max) MB/s -14%
4k q1 t1 write
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
324 (313.38min - 324.26max) MB/s +56%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
316 (303.42min - 316.13max) MB/s +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=129, last 2 years)
219 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
208 (195.06min - 207.75max) MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
208 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
164 (110.95min - 164max) MB/s -21%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
158.3 (155.02min - 158.29max) MB/s -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
157 (155.82min - 156.95max) MB/s -25%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
136.4 (134.95min - 136.4max) MB/s -34%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
112.4 (111.75min - 112.4max) MB/s -46%
4k q32 t16 read
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
8067 (7938.61min - 8067.38max) MB/s +103%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
3980 (3931.74min - 3980.4max) MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
3980 MB/s 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
3875 (3785.96min - 3874.69max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 8067, n=129, last 2 years)
2600 MB/s -35%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
1005 (964.75min - 1004.59max) MB/s -75%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
961 (945.93min - 961.25max) MB/s -76%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
908 (899.22min - 908.45max) MB/s -77%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
746 (519.37min - 746.01max) MB/s -81%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
746 (724.46min - 745.92max) MB/s -81%
4k q32 t16 write
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
5653 (5471.48min - 5652.63max) MB/s +605%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
5588 (5220.61min - 5587.73max) MB/s +597%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 5653, n=129, last 2 years)
2143 MB/s +167%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
802 (759.72min - 801.55max) MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
802 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
544 (523.14min - 543.91max) MB/s -32%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
513 (498.49min - 513.17max) MB/s -36%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
509 (431.35min - 509.01max) MB/s -37%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
442 (336.87min - 441.83max) MB/s -45%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
284 (254.39min - 283.58max) MB/s -65%
AS SSD
Score Total
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
11094 Points +27%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
9943 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
8857 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
8733 Points
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
8733 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2782 - 13854, n=126, last 2 years)
6874 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
5424 Points -38%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
4927 Points -44%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
4764 Points -45%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
4431 Points -49%
Score Read
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
4308 Points +35%
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
3886 Points +22%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
3198 Points
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
3198 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=126, last 2 years)
2389 Points -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
2056 Points -36%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
1811 Points -43%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
1667 Points -48%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1653 Points -48%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
1522 Points -52%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
5936 Points +51%
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
5208 Points +33%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
3919 Points
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
3919 Points 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
3466 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (989 - 7208, n=126, last 2 years)
3329 Points -15%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
3217 Points -18%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
2518 Points -36%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2267 Points -42%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
1774 Points -55%
Seq Read
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
9820.79 MB/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
9653 MB/s +67%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
7344.17 MB/s +27%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
6601.62 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
5795 MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
5795 MB/s 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
5700.22 MB/s -2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
5595 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
5476.6 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 9890, n=126, last 2 years)
5168 MB/s -11%
Seq Write
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
9926.3 MB/s +82%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
5562 MB/s +2%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
5535.91 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
5456 MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
5456 MB/s 0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
5305 MB/s -3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
4899.55 MB/s -10%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
4398.5 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (114.5 - 9926, n=126, last 2 years)
3949 MB/s -28%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
2995.22 MB/s -45%
4K Read
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
107.92 MB/s +60%
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
102.16 MB/s +52%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
81.6 MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 108.4, n=126, last 2 years)
68 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
67.51 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
67.3 MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
67.3 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
65.49 MB/s -3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
65.1 MB/s -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
60.87 MB/s -10%
4K Write
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
299.9 MB/s +51%
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
297.02 MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
226 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
219.58 MB/s +11%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
219.05 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (75.6 - 512, n=126, last 2 years)
219 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
198.5 MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
198.5 MB/s 0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
189.8 MB/s -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
133.55 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Read
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
3630.4 MB/s +42%
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
2801.97 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
2551 MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
2551 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3630, n=126, last 2 years)
1798 MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
1053.83 MB/s -59%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1029 MB/s -60%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
1015.81 MB/s -60%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
1010 MB/s -60%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
794.58 MB/s -69%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
5155 MB/s +62%
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
3918.24 MB/s +23%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
3175 MB/s
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
3175 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (521 - 5909, n=126, last 2 years)
2719 MB/s -14%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
2676.31 MB/s -16%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
2557.76 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
1998.53 MB/s -37%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1546 MB/s -51%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
1087.18 MB/s -66%
Access Time Read
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
0.067 ms * -179%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=126, last 2 years)
0.05638 ms * -135%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
0.052 ms * -117%
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
0.039 ms * -63%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
0.036 ms * -50%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
0.034 ms * -42%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
0.029 ms * -21%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
0.025 ms * -4%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
0.024 ms *
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
0.024 ms * -0%
Access Time Write
Alienware 18 Area-51
 
0.096 ms * -57%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Lexar NM790 2TB
0.061 ms *
Average Lexar NM790 2TB
  (n=1)
0.061 ms * -0%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
 
0.057 ms * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 - 0.29, n=126, last 2 years)
0.03994 ms * +35%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
0.029 ms * +52%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
0.019 ms * +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
0.017 ms * +72%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Phison E31 2 TB
0.016 ms * +74%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
0.014 ms * +77%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6926 (6006.45-6951.01)

图形处理器性能

刀锋 18 配备了最快的 175 瓦版 GeForce RTX 5090 移动 GPU.无论是在合成测试还是在玩游戏时,GPU 的性能都非常出色。在 4K 显示屏上,您可以看到与 RTX 5080 移动 GPU 的性能优势。它还能更好地利用 GPU,尽管有些游戏在不进行升频的情况下要求过高(如《F1 25》)。在持续负载下,GPU 性能保持完全稳定。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
97.4 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
 
94.3 pt
Alienware 18 Area-51
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
94.2 pt
Aorus Master 18 AM8H -1!
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
94.2 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
93.3 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
93 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
85.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 -1!
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
85.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
61.5 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
72141 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
67552 Points +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
66617 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (48548 - 76300, n=15)
66595 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
66337 Points 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
65338 Points -2%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
64952 Points -2%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
58943 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (10741 - 76300, n=139, last 2 years)
47355 Points -29%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
53282 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (42175 - 62849, n=17)
52118 Points -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
50860 Points -5%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
50772 Points -5%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
48863 Points -8%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
47806 Points -10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44702 Points -16%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
42377 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 62849, n=155, last 2 years)
34571 Points -35%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Alienware 18 Area-51
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
25763 Points +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
25198 Points
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
24599 Points -2%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (19216 - 25763, n=16)
23963 Points -5%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
23960 Points -5%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
23165 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
21335 Points -15%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
21246 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 25763, n=151, last 2 years)
14496 Points -42%
Steel Nomad Score
Alienware 18 Area-51
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6329 Points 0%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6304 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
6163 Points -2%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (4791 - 6329, n=12)
5950 Points -6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5883 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1522 - 6329, n=54, last 2 years)
3741 Points -41%
3DMark 11 Performance
48598 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
40595 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
23241 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
6304 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
27000 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
27266 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=141, last 2 years)
19.6 Seconds * -78%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15 Seconds * -36%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
10 Seconds * +9%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
14 Seconds * -27%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
13 Seconds * -18%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (9 - 18, n=15)
11.9 Seconds * -8%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
11 Seconds *
Alienware 18 Area-51
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
10 Seconds * +9%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
9.9 Seconds * +10%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (15 - 110, n=141, last 2 years)
32.9 Seconds * -119%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19 Seconds * -27%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19 Seconds * -27%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (15 - 37, n=13)
18 Seconds * -20%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
16 Seconds * -7%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
16 Seconds * -7%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (122 - 962, n=144, last 2 years)
269 Seconds * -88%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
207 Seconds * -45%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
190 Seconds * -33%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
162 Seconds * -13%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (123 - 259, n=15)
156.7 Seconds * -10%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
143 Seconds *
Alienware 18 Area-51
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
138 Seconds * +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
137 Seconds * +4%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
132 Seconds * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware 18 Area-51 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97.9 pt
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
96.8 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
96.6 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
92.7 pt
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
91.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
83.7 pt
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
77 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
67.2 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
166.5 (132.2min, 120P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
163.4 fps
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
157.5 (121.6min) fps -4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
154.9 (126.3min) fps -5%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
152.5 (120min) fps -7%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
139.8 (111min) fps -14%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
101.25 (77.2min) fps -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 166.5, n=131, last 2 years)
99.6 fps -39%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
236.5 fps +11%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
225.3 (158.5P0.1, 180.2P1) fps +6%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
213 fps
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
196.2 (73min, 121.6P0.1, 161.9P1) fps -8%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
193.7 fps -9%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
179.6 (45.8min, 89.1P0.1, 130.1P1) fps -16%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
160.5 (65P0.1, 99.5P1) fps -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 246, n=96, last 2 years)
132.1 fps -38%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
166.2 (3min, 111.1P1) fps
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
166.1 (3.18min, 125P1) fps 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
162.4 (5.01min, 111.1P1) fps -2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
161.9 (2.78min, 111.1P1) fps -3%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
139.5 (3.39min, 100P1) fps -16%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
129.8 (16.1min, 90.9P1) fps -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 186.9, n=130, last 2 years)
122.2 fps -26%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
215 fps
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
212 fps -1%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
212 fps -1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
201 fps -7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
199.3 fps -7%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
189.9 fps -12%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
156.9 fps -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 215, n=144, last 2 years)
131.6 fps -39%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
456 (177min, 324P1) fps +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
453 (129.8min, 324P1) fps
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
437 (182.3min, 325P1) fps -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
418 (112min, 292P1) fps -8%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
401 (103.4min, 236P1) fps -11%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
371 (146.9min, 276P1) fps -18%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
325 (49.1min, 213P1) fps -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 456, n=133, last 2 years)
252 fps -44%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
186.6 (157.4min) fps +6%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
184.7 (156.6min) fps +5%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
175.5 (149.3min) fps
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
171.5 (139.4min) fps -2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
170.3 (143.1min) fps -3%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
164 (140min) fps -7%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
162.3 (136.4min) fps -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 248, n=146, last 2 years)
153.8 fps -12%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127.2 fps +4%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
122.9 fps +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
122.1 fps
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
121.7 fps 0%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
120.9 fps -1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
110 fps -10%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
108.9 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.4 - 150.2, n=148, last 2 years)
104.3 fps -15%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
120.5 (101.1min, 95.7P1) fps +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
118.9 (97.3min) fps
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
115.6 (97.5min) fps -3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (83.2 - 120.5, n=18)
109.3 fps -8%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
106.8 (87.4min) fps -10%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
104.8 (86min) fps -12%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
96.4 (80min) fps -19%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.38 (67.53min) fps -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 120.5, n=112, last 2 years)
71.8 fps -40%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
174.8 fps +8%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
161.5 fps
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
158.4 (120.3P0.1, 132.4P1) fps -2%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (103.1 - 174.8, n=16)
148.7 fps -8%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
145.6 fps -10%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
139.6 (108.1min, 116P0.1, 122P1) fps -14%
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
130.5 (100.6min, 100.9P0.1, 107.2P1) fps -19%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
119.2 (40.8P0.1, 73.2P1) fps -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 175.5, n=83, last 2 years)
102.8 fps -36%
F1 24 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
106.4 (72min, 80P1) fps +3%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
105 (79min, 83P1) fps +1%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103.6 (69min, 75P1) fps
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
100 fps -3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (72.5 - 106.4, n=16)
98.1 fps -5%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
95 (72min) fps -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (29.8 - 106.4, n=44, last 2 years)
71.4 fps -31%
F1 25 - 2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
37.5 (18min, 22P1) fps
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
35.8 (19min, 21P1) fps -5%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (30.9 - 37.5, n=6)
35.2 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (5 - 37.5, n=15, last 2 years)
21.6 fps -42%
Alan Wake 2 - 2560x1440 High Preset
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
91.4 fps
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
88.1 fps -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84.5 (33.7P0.1, 54.5P1) fps -8%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (57.6 - 91.4, n=14)
83.6 fps -9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82.4 fps -10%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
79.4 (33.5P0.1, 57.9P1) fps -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.5 - 91.4, n=40, last 2 years)
67.3 fps -26%
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
131 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (92 - 136, n=7)
120.3 fps -8%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
117 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (60 - 131, n=15, last 2 years)
90.5 fps -31%
Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
64 (27min) fps +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
63 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (37 - 64, n=14)
55.7 fps -12%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
54 (26min) fps -14%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
51 fps -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (25 - 64, n=37, last 2 years)
45.6 fps -28%

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø157 (138.6-159.4)
赛博朋克 2077》CPU/GPU 数据
赛博朋克 2077》CPU/GPU 数据
lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD4K DLSS4K
GTA V (2015) 166.2 165.6 176.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 223 196.6 190.2 175.5 174
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 232 230 215 181 109.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 160 159.9 122.1 95.6
Strange Brigade (2018) 643 509 485 453 345 179.3
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 274 244 213.5 213 161.5 89.8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 186 185 174.5 163.4 132.4 118.9 54.7
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 123.4 119.6 116.1 91.4 49.6
F1 24 (2024) 301 299 281 144.9 141.8 103.6 89.2 52.3
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) 205 194 169 162 131 60
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) 115 109 95 75 63 46
F1 25 (2025) 240 226 217 62.3 67.5 37.5 34.1 17.8

排放与能源

噪音排放

冷却装置
冷却装置

庞大的冷却系统和两个风扇(加上小型机箱风扇)在日常使用中通常听不到声音,尤其是在使用较低功率配置文件时。在负载情况下,风扇会变得很明显,我们在游戏时测得的最大噪音为 48 dB(A),即使在Turbo模式下也是如此。在 CPU 负载较高的压力测试中,风扇噪音高达 53 分贝(A)。平衡模式下的最大噪音为 43 dB(A),尤其适合游戏,因为性能仍然非常出色。在评测设备上没有检测到其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
23.4 / 23.4 / 23.4 dB(A)
Load
40.4 / 53.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.734.743.435.636.9252928.326.729.323.33127.935.525.623.525.94032.742.328.423.827.95027.731.82620.2256328.230.524.119.6228025.324.520.818.7191002825.921.11620.212530.127.122.71623.11602926.422.513.419.920032.427.324.913.921.225033.730.525.91526.431535.13126.214.322.44003732.827.213.721.35003833.427.311.421.563038.834.928.810.721.98004035.829.610.420.7100041.536.73110.320.5125043.338.930.710.920.816004540.132.210.922.2200043.537.829.910.520.3250042.837.428.910.919.5315040.834.927.911.515.2400039.834.425.811.312.5500041.335.523.811.312.1630040.733.121.311.411.5800038.830.419.411.311.31000034.826.316.811.511.11250031.42216.311.210.91600025.716.414.110.410.1SPL53.548.240.423.431.1N9.16.23.30.51.4median 38.8median 33.1median 25.9median 11.3median 20.3Delta4.54.63.91.44.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
Noise
-13%
-29%
-17%
-17%
-14%
-9%
off / environment *
23.4
23.4
-0%
25
-7%
25
-7%
25.56
-9%
23.3
-0%
23.4
-0%
Idle Minimum *
23.4
30.2
-29%
25
-7%
26
-11%
27.68
-18%
29.8
-27%
23.9
-2%
Idle Average *
23.4
30.6
-31%
39
-67%
29
-24%
27.68
-18%
29.8
-27%
28.2
-21%
Idle Maximum *
23.4
30.6
-31%
42
-79%
34
-45%
31.54
-35%
29.8
-27%
29
-24%
Load Average *
40.4
38
6%
52
-29%
50
-24%
44
-9%
42.9
-6%
36.8
9%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
48.2
48.9
-1%
53
-10%
52
-8%
58.7
-22%
53.7
-11%
Load Maximum *
53.5
55.9
-4%
55
-3%
53
1%
58.9
-10%
53.7
-0%
61.1
-14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.1

* ... smaller is better

温度

机箱温度是完全安全的,强大的冷却系统在这方面发挥了积极作用。即使在压力测试中,我们在底座顶部测得的最高温度也只有 44°C(底部更低)。虽然键盘会明显发热,但没有任何限制。在压力测试中,图形处理器以 175 瓦的全功率运行,处理器以 90 瓦的功率运行。

CPU/GPU 数据压力测试
CPU/GPU 数据压力测试
Max. Load
 39.9 °C44.3 °C41 °C 
 38.4 °C42.4 °C41.3 °C 
 40.1 °C40.6 °C39.9 °C 
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
39.3 °C42 °C40 °C
39.4 °C41.5 °C36.3 °C
37.1 °C38 °C37.4 °C
Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 39 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105.1 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.7 °C / -21.1 F).
应力测试表面温度(顶部)
应力测试表面温度(顶部)
应力测试表面温度(底部)
应力测试表面温度(底部)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Alienware 18 Area-51
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat
2%
-12%
-21%
-30%
-6%
-16%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.3
36.8
17%
47
-6%
50
-13%
48.2
-9%
45.6
-3%
43.2
2%
Maximum Bottom *
42
35.8
15%
48
-14%
46
-10%
53.6
-28%
46
-10%
42.6
-1%
Idle Upper Side *
27.2
30.6
-13%
29
-7%
36
-32%
37.2
-37%
28.9
-6%
36
-32%
Idle Bottom *
27.5
30.8
-12%
33
-20%
35
-27%
40.4
-47%
29.2
-6%
36.4
-32%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

音响系统由 6 个模块组成(2 个高音扬声器、4 个低音扬声器),总体而言,音质非常出色。不过,这也是 前代表现略胜一筹。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.6372529.335.33123.535.94023.838.95020.238.96319.643.88018.748.21001653.21251658.616013.459.720013.967.72501569.231514.37440013.775.750011.476.463010.780.280010.479.1100010.374.3125010.972.6160010.973.6200010.568.5250010.969.3315011.565.1400011.363.8500011.361.9630011.460.6800011.361.81000011.559.71250011.259.11600010.452.3SPL23.484.6N0.561.2median 11.3median 67.7Delta1.4735.532.835.524.922.624.923.325.423.324.821.224.831.522.331.526.622.226.627.422.727.431.921.331.940.719.640.758.122.158.163.721.563.767.223.367.270.223.470.272.924.272.972.622.872.677.520.677.577.921.277.975.421.375.477.919.677.976.819.876.87618767717.6777615.27677.614.477.67613.17671.912.671.971.112.371.170.612.170.664.311.964.363.310.963.387.930.687.978.61.478.6median 72.9median 19.6median 72.96.34.16.339.739.738.537.447.942.433.42835.4252523.316.52414.43216.34316.751.22059.716.469.613.468.813.172.612.472.411.567.411.671.911.772.711.376.211.177.911.879.812.378.813.474.613.666.913.677.114.477.814.479.913.779.213.462.812.166.825.288.70.679.5median 13.4median 72.61.97.245.548.940.139.446.949.13034.124.328.623.93419.435.913.943.215.950.116.853.918.95816.864.115.266.415.771.116.369.913.96811.965.31162.110.763.411.764.711.864.211.861.813.261.114.761.314.368.214.966.114.566.114.460.113.657.11252.725.777.20.743.7median 14.3median 63.424.124.931.425.431.628.73823.132.825.832.228.537.428.335.724.334.825.63925.548.227.254.822.258.619.861.516.461.417.275.71482.21376.512.277.612.176.411.876.611.978.211.177.210.67110.469.51067.810.466.610.572.310.268.410.166.39.758.625.687.40.770.9median 12.1median 69.54.78.731.135.925.634.325.632.928.533.425.233.621.434.61842.618.848.917.85416.753.515.761.416.865.513.966.411.667.410.374.110.382.710.280.49.778.811.2779.974.110.26910.6641167.111.367.411.561.911.662.811.763.51263.411.760.212.249.823.386.30.563.3median 11.6median 65.51.75.633.935.433.926.127.326.12523.7252622.62636.128.336.14623.64655.223.555.258.222.758.261.917.961.970.218.170.27122.77175.322.475.37617.57675.517.875.576.818.476.874.918.474.974.520.974.56319.26372.118.772.176.220.176.274.916.874.97614.87670.813.870.870.512.670.57112.37169.912.169.965.611.965.663.21263.262.911.862.957.911.257.985.22985.270.21.170.2median 71median 17.8median 714.53.94.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopAlienware 18 Area-51Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Aorus Master 18 AM8HMSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGAsus Strix Scar 18 G835LXRazer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Alienware 18 Area-51 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Aorus Master 18 AM8H audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量

400 瓦 PSU
400 瓦 PSU

Blade 18 并不是一款特别高效的笔记本电脑。在全亮度下空转时,我们测得的最大功率为 28 瓦。这主要是由于 4K 大显示屏造成的。将频率从 240 Hz 降至 60 Hz 可减少约 6.5 瓦的空闲功耗。在压力测试中,我们测得的最大功率略低于 370 瓦,因此 400 瓦的电源完全够用。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.26 / 1.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 18.1 / 27.9 / 28.7 Watt
Load midlight 108.3 / 366.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB
Alienware 18 Area-51
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
Power Consumption
-51%
28%
-20%
-4%
-13%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
18.1
38.4
-112%
7.9
56%
29
-60%
19.01
-5%
11.4
37%
25.4
-40%
Idle Average *
27.9
45.6
-63%
11.5
59%
33
-18%
30.92
-11%
39.2
-41%
37.7
-35%
Idle Maximum *
28.7
57.5
-100%
16.6
42%
48
-67%
33.84
-18%
40.2
-40%
57.9
-102%
Load Average *
108.3
190.1
-76%
130
-20%
141
-30%
105.4
3%
161.2
-49%
128.4
-19%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
338
340
-1%
253
25%
283
16%
343
-1%
303
10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
331
333
-1%
245
26%
283
15%
330
-0%
295
11%
Load Maximum *
366.7
373.2
-2%
330
10%
340
7%
354
3%
430.9
-18%
297.9
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
273.1

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø352 (330-367)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø22.2 (17-25.7)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø338 (332-345)

Power consumption with an external monitor

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø214 (195.8-234)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø212 (210-216)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø45.2 (42-78.2)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø213 (199.4-220)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø226 (210-236)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11 (6.07-15.4)
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø331 (317-338)

电池寿命

99 Wh 的大容量电池提供了良好的运行时间。在 150 cd/m²(相当于评测设备最大亮度的 45%)和 60 Hz 的条件下进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中,我们测得的运行时间为 7 小时 45 分钟,而在全亮度条件下,我们仍能运行 4 小时 10 分钟。

电池信息
电池信息
拉德沃岗
拉德沃岗
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 45min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
4h 10min
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh
476 min +2%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.99 Wh
465 min
Average of class Gaming
  (85 - 889, n=128, last 2 years)
390 min -16%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh
332 min -29%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh
296 min -36%
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh
263 min -43%
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh
259 min -44%
Alienware 18 Area-51
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 96 Wh
118 min -75%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 534, n=38, last 2 years)
303 min +21%
Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.99 Wh
250 min
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh
167 min -33%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop - 07/14/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
86%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
81 / 80 → 100%
Weight
55 / 10-68 → 78%
Battery
74 / 95 → 77%
Display
86%
Games Performance
95%
Application Performance
94%
Temperature
87 / 95 → 91%
Noise
77 / 90 → 86%
Audio
82%
Camera
45 / 75 → 60%
Average
66%
90%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
100%
Power Use
71.3%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 38.9%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 速度极快但相对安静的游戏玩家 - Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测
Andreas Osthoff, 2025-07-15 (Update: 2025-07-15)