Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 笔记本电脑评测：配备可选水冷系统的 RTX 5090 游戏本

Name: Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate
Brand: Medion

Medion 解开了它的爪子。

Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate 是目前市场上速度最快的游戏笔记本之一，可根据需要使用外部水冷。我们将这款 16 英寸机型与竞争对手进行了比较，并让它体验了最新的游戏。
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 06/03/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

结论 - 速度最快的 RTX 5090 笔记本之一

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 当然不便宜：在测试时，要购买配备 Core Ultra 9 275HX、GeForce RTX 5090、32 GB 内存和 2 TB SSD 的顶级版本 MD62732，您必须在桌面上放上 4000 多欧元（约合 4539 美元）。我们将在本文中分析与 RTX 5080 设备相比，这笔附加费用是否值得。总而言之，这款 16 英寸笔记本电脑获得了 "非常好 "的评价，这归功于它的性能、显示屏和外壳。16:10 格式（2,560 x 1,600 像素，300 Hz）的迷你 LED 面板凭借其高亮度、丰富的对比度和宽色域获得了不少分数，这不仅会让游戏玩家满意，也会让专业用户满意。

Test device courtesy of Medion DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

由于采用了金属嵌件，机箱的质量很高，而且稳定性很好，给人留下了深刻印象。输入设备和连接也不错。Erazer Beast 16 X1 提供了一个 Thunderbolt 4 端口。批评的地方不多，但在测试中最让我们头疼的是在负载情况下产生的巨大噪音。遗憾的是，几乎所有游戏笔记本电脑都存在这一缺陷。

如果你想让笔记本电脑发挥更大的效能，你可以购买可选的Erazer 冷却套件 V2价格约为 250 欧元（约合 284 美元）。我们将很快发布一篇单独的文章，介绍一些合适的测量方法。

Pros

+ 坚固耐用的优质金属外壳

+ 一流的微型 LED 面板

+ 多种（现代）连接方式

+ 可选水冷

+ 令人信服的键盘

+ 隐私百叶窗

+ 强劲音效

+ 24GB GDDR7

+ 快速固态硬盘

Cons

- 除了 VRAM 之外，RTX 5090 版本的附加费用只有部分是合理的

- CPU 性能起伏不定

- 负载时声音较大

价格和供应情况

Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate MD62732 在Medion 主页上的售价约为 4,300 欧元（约合人民币 4879 元）。(目前降至 4090 欧元/~4641 美元）。

Amazon

结论 - 速度最快的 RTX 5090 笔记本之一
规格
住房
设备
输入设备
显示屏
性能
排放量
能源管理
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

例如，同样包含 RTX 5000 GPU 的 16 英寸同类产品有惠普 Omen Max 16以及华硕 ROG Strix Scar 16、联想联想Legion Pro 7i 16和华硕 ROG Strix G16都作为对比设备出现在表格中。不过，主要竞争对手是大致相同的 XMG Neo 16 E25.

规格

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate (Erazer Beast Series)

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 210 W PL2 / Short Burst, 210 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 1597 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR7, ForceWare 576.52, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, NE160QDM-NM9 (BOE0D5A), Mini-LED, glossy: no, HDR, 300 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)

Storage

Phison E31 2 TB, NVMe-SSD, two M.2 2280 slots (one empty)

Soundcard

Intel Arrow Point PCH - Audio Context Engine

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Line-In/Out, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Water Cooling Port

Networking

Realtek Gaming 2.5GbE Family Controller (10MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 357 x 245

Battery

99 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 Cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 420 W Power Supply, Erazer Control Center, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.834 kg, Power Supply: 656 g

Price

4300 EUR

Links

Medion homepage
Medion notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

住房

正如开头提到的，机壳给人留下了非常好的印象。Medion 选用了同方的机箱，即使在重压下也能保持良好的稳定性，整体感觉非常优雅。其形状和边缘设计将优雅和俏皮完美地结合在一起，而照明爱好者可以期待正面时尚的 LED 灯带（见照片）。2.8 千克（约 6.2 磅）的重量不轻也不重，与 Strix Scar 16 和 Omen Max 16 不相上下。3 厘米的高度也不算过高。180° 的大开合角度值得特别推崇--不是每个竞争对手都能做到这一点。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop HP Omen Max 16 ah000 DIN A4 ❌

设备

Beast 16 X1 拥有各种现代化接口。 2.5 Gbit LAN 与 HDMI 2.1、（迷你）DisplayPort 2.1a 和 Thunderbolt 4 以及一个 USB-C 3.2 Gen2 端口、两个 USB-A 3.2 Gen1 端口、一个音频插座和一个快速读卡器一样先进。外部水冷系统的输入接口也位于机身后部。无线模块的性能也无可挑剔；虽然英特尔的 AX211 芯片不支持 Wi-Fi 7，但仍能达到很高甚至非常高的速度。

网络摄像头的图像质量一般：由于采用了全高清分辨率，它比某些竞争对手的高清摄像头要清晰一些，但你也不要期望它能创造奇迹。Medion 在物理覆盖方面值得加分。卸下 10 颗十字螺丝和外壳底座后，就可以对 Beast 16 X1 进行维修。16 英寸型号可容纳两个 SO-DIMM 组和两个 M.2-2280 插槽（1 个 PCIe 5、1 个 PCIe 4），每个插槽都隐藏在散热器下。说到散热系统：游戏机配备了三个风扇。

SD 读卡器

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	191 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	123 MB/s -36%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 204, n=73, last 2 years)	97.9 MB/s -49%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	260.6 MB/s +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	251 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=72, last 2 years)	127.9 MB/s -49%

交流

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1681 (1637^min - 1732^max) MBit/s +31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1648 (1560^min - 1713^max) MBit/s +28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1641 (1404^min - 1722^max) MBit/s +28%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1286 (1014^min - 1359^max) MBit/s
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1270 (961^min - 1408^max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1862, n=122, last 2 years)	1238 MBit/s -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=254)	1234 MBit/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1194 (998^min - 1286^max) MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1717 (1648^min - 1739^max) MBit/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1642 (1345^min - 1690^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1577 (1533^min - 1598^max) MBit/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1574 (1553^min - 1595^max) MBit/s -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1422 (1224^min - 1482^max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1741, n=122, last 2 years)	1419 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=254)	1390 MBit/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1312 (1065^min - 1393^max) MBit/s -20%

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1286 (1014-1359)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1681 (1637-1732)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1270 (961-1408)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1641 (1404-1722)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1194 (998-1286)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1560-1713)

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1642 (1345-1690)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1717 (1648-1739)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1421 (1224-1482)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1573 (1553-1595)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (1065-1393)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1533-1598)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate: 7.48 ∆E min: 3.25 - max: 12.09 ∆E

维护

输入设备

Beast 16 X1 的键盘给人留下了非常好的反馈印象，几乎与机械键盘相当。右侧有一个专用数字键盘，其按键比其他按键略窄。这些按键的正常尺寸会让方向箭头爱好者感到欣喜。内置照明（每个按键 RGB）可调节到多个级别。

触摸板在精确度、滑动性能和手势支持等方面都非常出色。触摸板的尺寸为 12.4 x 7.6 厘米（约 4.9 x 3.0 英寸），大小适中。下边缘的点击区域触发时声音较大，但具有与键盘类似的实体（触觉）反馈。

显示屏

Beast 16 X1 的最大亮点之一是其一流的微型 LED 显示屏。即使开箱即用，16 英寸屏幕也能提供相当高的色彩准确度。


791 cd/m²	800 cd/m²	817 cd/m²
820 cd/m²	837 cd/m²	828 cd/m²
829 cd/m²	833 cd/m²	838 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

NE160QDM-NM9 (BOE0D5A) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 838 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 821.4 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 837 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
86.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.214

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate NE160QDM-NM9 (BOE0D5A), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop NE160QDM-NM9, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Samsung ATNA60DL02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 NE160QDM-NM8, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Samsung ATNA60HU01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 NE160QDM-NZC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Display		1%	4%	1%	3%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	99.7	99.9 0%	99.7 0%	99.9 0%	99.5 0%	99.1 -1%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	86.9	88.5 2%	98.2 13%	88.4 2%	94.4 9%	89.1 3%
Response Times		-33%	87%	16%	88%	42%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	10 ?(4.7, 5.3)	17.4 ?(8.4, 9) -74%	0.29 ?(0.15, 0.14) 97%	7 ?(5, 2) 30%	0.28 ?(0.14, 0.14) 97%	4.6 ?(2.1, 2.5) 54%
Response Time Black / White *	8.6 ?(4.2, 6.4)	13 ?(4.6, 8.4) -51%	0.47 ?(0.25, 0.22) 95%	8.4 ?(4, 4.4) 2%	0.43 ?(0.22, 0.21) 95%	6.1 ?(1.6, 4.5) 29%
PWM Frequency	20457 ?(92)	20253	960 ?(100)	20555 ?(100)	1438 ?(100)
PWM Amplitude *	100	75 25%	31 69%		29 71%
Screen		-29%	-30%	23%	-17%	-4%
Brightness middle	837	888 6%	376.5 -55%	754 -10%	490.4 -41%	545 -35%
Brightness	821	859 5%	382 -53%	773 -6%	498 -39%	536 -35%
Brightness Distribution	94	94 0%	96 2%	91 -3%	97 3%	89 -5%
Black Level *				0.07		0.41
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.59	3.3 -108%	3.67 -131%	1 37%	3.2 -101%	1.6 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.27	5.5 -4%	7.24 -37%	2 62%	6.04 -15%	4 24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.03	1.5 -46%	0.94 9%		0.84 18%	0.8 22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	3.8 -58%	1.1 54%	1 58%	1 58%	2.4 -0%
Gamma	2.214 ^99%	2.46 ^89%	2.25 ^98%	2.14 ^103%	2.24 ^98%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6186 ^105%	6267 ^104%	6319 ^103%	6493 ^100%	6373 ^102%	6737 ^96%
Contrast				10771		1329
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-20% / -23%	20% / 5%	13% / 16%	25% / 12%	13% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

总体而言，100% sRGB 或 DCI-P3 和 87% AdobeRGB 的色彩空间覆盖率令人印象深刻，尽管这也适用于竞争对手的 OLED 或 IPS 面板。在亮度方面（我们在 SDR 模式下进行了测试；如果需要，也可以激活 HDR），Beast 16 X1 和 Neo 16 以平均 821 cd/m² 的亮度遥遥领先，这是一个非常出色的结果。

加上较低的黑阶，因此对比度极佳。响应时间与典型的 IPS 面板相当。

遗憾的是，屏幕在亮度达到 92% 时会出现闪烁。不过，由于频率很高，即使是敏感的人也不会有任何问题。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.2 ms rise
8.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.7 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

20457 Hz
Amplitude: 100 %

≤ 92 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 20457 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 92 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 20457 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8429 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能

野兽 16 X1 可配备 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑或 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑因此，无论哪种情况，它都属于高端产品。使用后一种 GPU 时，该设备的价格要低 1000 欧元（约合 1135 美元）左右，而 RTX 5090 版本的附加费则相应较高。

测试条件

实用：一个特殊的按钮（在电源按钮旁边）可用于快速切换操作模式。"静音 "亮绿色，"平衡 "亮蓝色，"游戏 "亮紫色。对噪音水平和性能的影响见下表。除电池测试外，我们的测量都是在游戏模式下完成的。Erazer 控制中心似乎还存在一个错误，它也可用于切换模式：在（重新）启动笔记本后，这里只选择了 "静音 "模式--至少在显示方面是这样。

Erazer 控制中心模式	静音	平衡	游戏
赛博朋克 2077》噪音	42 dB(A)	48 dB(A)	55 dB(A)
赛博朋克 2077》性能（FHD/超高清）	83.8 帧/秒	148.6 帧/秒	158.5 帧/秒
Cinebench R15 Multi Score	3318 分数	4494 分数	6067 分数

处理器

英特尔酷睿至尊 9 275HX在 Beast 16 X1 中，来自箭湖一代的英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 给人留下了喜忧参半的感觉。乍一看，性能达到了预期水平，在某些情况下甚至更高。然而，正如我们的 Cinebench 循环所显示的那样，在长时间负载的情况下，性能会出现下降，而竞争对手却不会出现这种情况。

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5347 (4011.63-6161.43)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø6151 (6038.65-6270.58)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5145 (5108.56-5171.97)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5832 (5537.87-5930.32)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5698 (5601.46-5746.3)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5851 (5702.07-5999.7)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	86.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	83.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	82.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	81.4 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	81.2 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	79.9 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	74.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	60.6 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	40951 Points +33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	38039 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	36597 (34151.5^min - 36596.9^max) Points +19%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30712 - 40970, n=12)	36040 Points +17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	34981 Points +14%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	33449 (32761.6^min - 33449.1^max) Points +9%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	30712 Points
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=146, last 2 years)	23161 Points -25%
Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2260 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2256 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2126 - 2267, n=12)	2211 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2195 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2192 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2141 Points -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2128 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=146, last 2 years)	1929 Points -14%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	15881 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14828 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14183 Points +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12257 - 16108, n=12)	14172 Points +16%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	13934 Points +14%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	13178 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	12257 Points
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=146, last 2 years)	8916 Points -27%
CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	869 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	869 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	859 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (811 - 870, n=12)	851 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	843 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	831 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	811 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=146, last 2 years)	743 Points -14%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6271 (6038.65^min - 6270.58^max) Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6161 (4011.63^min - 6161.43^max) Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6000 (5702.07^min - 5999.7^max) Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5930 (5537.87^min - 5930.32^max) Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5746 (5601.46^min - 5746.3^max) Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4853 - 6271, n=12)	5730 Points -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5172 (5108.56^min - 5171.97^max) Points -16%
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=149, last 2 years)	3576 Points -42%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	341 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	340 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	340 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	337 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	336 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (317 - 343, n=12)	336 Points 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	317 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=146, last 2 years)	285 Points -15%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=140, last 2 years)	164.4 Seconds * -43%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	115 Seconds *
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	102 Seconds * +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82 - 116, n=12)	94.5 Seconds * +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	90 Seconds * +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	87 Seconds * +24%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	86 Seconds * +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	83 Seconds * +28%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	124155 MIPS +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	121092 MIPS 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	120932 MIPS
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	118614 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	117940 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (99248 - 124155, n=12)	116054 MIPS -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	104686 MIPS -13%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=144, last 2 years)	87096 MIPS -28%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	7149 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	7114 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	7036 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6186 - 7149, n=12)	6862 MIPS -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6654 MIPS -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6607 MIPS -8%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=144, last 2 years)	6344 MIPS -11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6186 MIPS -13%

Geekbench 6.4
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	20902 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	20890 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	20443 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=13)	19589 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	19535 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	19081 Points -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	18322 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=133, last 2 years)	14980 Points -27%
Single-Core
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3141 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3109 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2917 - 3160, n=13)	3076 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3072 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3052 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3012 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2917 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=133, last 2 years)	2723 Points -13%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	25599 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	24829 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	24285 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (19105 - 25855, n=12)	23420 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	23308 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	22414 Points -10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	21195 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=143, last 2 years)	15681 Points -37%
Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2264 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2250 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2235 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2034 - 2292, n=12)	2221 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2199 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2177 Points -3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2034 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=143, last 2 years)	1952 Points -13%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	43.2 fps +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	41.5 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	40.4 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	40.2 fps -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (32.6 - 43.8, n=12)	39 fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	38.9 fps -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	35 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=144, last 2 years)	25.2 fps -39%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	57.8 s *
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=142, last 2 years)	47.7 s * +17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (36.9 - 62.1, n=12)	44.8 s * +22%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	41.4 s * +28%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	40.7 s * +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	40.5 s * +30%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	39.8 s * +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	36.9 s * +36%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4568 sec * -14%
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=145, last 2 years)	0.433 sec * -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4141 sec * -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4132 sec * -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=12)	0.4114 sec * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4053 sec * -1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4011 sec *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.3978 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

6161 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

296 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

337 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

869 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

12257 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

30712 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2256 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1547 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

136 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	99.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	98.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	96.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	96.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	93.7 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	92.3 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	86.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	69.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	39895 KRay/s +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	39551 KRay/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	39164 KRay/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	38481 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (29330 - 39895, n=11)	36469 KRay/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	35760 KRay/s -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	34180 KRay/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=143, last 2 years)	25570 KRay/s -34%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	198802 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	192417 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	191476 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	189586 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	183428 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (140254 - 198802, n=11)	181394 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	173656 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=143, last 2 years)	117670 Points -38%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9734 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9480 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	9458 MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9263 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	8828 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6998 - 9734, n=11)	8810 MB/s -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	8315 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=143, last 2 years)	5353 MB/s -42%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	140695 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	139554 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	138882 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	138622 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	137820 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (113887 - 140695, n=11)	133532 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	128670 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=143, last 2 years)	117254 Points -16%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	14415 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	14382 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	13969 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=143, last 2 years)	13963 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	13955 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	13926 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (11172 - 14415, n=11)	13553 Points -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	12272 Points -15%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	102847 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	102630 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	102544 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	98647 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	95742 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72596 - 104057, n=11)	95211 Points -3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	90980 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=143, last 2 years)	60244 Points -39%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	136847 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	136767 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	134429 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	134042 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	134008 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (107858 - 136847, n=11)	128668 MB/s -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	118108 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=143, last 2 years)	109781 MB/s -20%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2263 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2238 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	2202 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2179 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1757 - 2263, n=11)	2073 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	2067 MB/s -8%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1896 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=143, last 2 years)	1436 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	21185 KRay/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	21122 KRay/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	20910 KRay/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	20672 KRay/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	19630 KRay/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14847 - 21372, n=11)	19546 KRay/s -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	18490 KRay/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=143, last 2 years)	13719 KRay/s -34%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	56613 MPixel/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	53630 MPixel/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	53522 MPixel/s +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (47726 - 56613, n=11)	51412 MPixel/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	49190 MPixel/s
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	49039 MPixel/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	47726 MPixel/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62274, n=143, last 2 years)	41311 MPixel/s -16%

系统性能

不过，在系统性能方面，Medion 笔记本电脑的综合评分最高。

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	91.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	89.3 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	88.2 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	88 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	87.8 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 ^-1! GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	84.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	78.7 pt

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	9153 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9032 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	8856 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	8819 Points +4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	8794 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (8241 - 9032, n=7)	8662 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	8518 Points
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=130, last 2 years)	7998 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	11369 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	11215 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	11177 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	11162 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	11103 Points -2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	10969 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9994 - 11369, n=7)	10949 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years)	10798 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=130, last 2 years)	9921 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	9590 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	9515 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9317 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9122 - 9515, n=7)	9309 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	9212 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	9164 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	9122 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	19351 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	19227 Points +24%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	18445 Points +19%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	18305 Points +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	18293 Points +18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15507 - 19227, n=7)	17344 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	15507 Points
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=130, last 2 years)	13132 Points -15%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2249 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	2211 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1995 - 2282, n=7)	2194 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	2165 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2144 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	2017 Points -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1995 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=112, last 2 years)	1939 Points -12%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2062 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	2040 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1847 - 2119, n=7)	2021 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	2014 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1948 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1922 Points -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1847 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=112, last 2 years)	1830 Points -10%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2612 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	2570 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2556 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2285 - 2612, n=7)	2511 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	2451 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	2288 Points -11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	2285 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=112, last 2 years)	2148 Points -16%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1673 - 2181, n=7)	1878 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1864 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	1853 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	1793 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=112, last 2 years)	1711 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1686 Points -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1673 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1597 Points -11%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	359 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	359 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	349 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	347 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	344 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (315 - 359, n=7)	341 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	331 Points
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=124, last 2 years)	309 Points -7%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	337 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	336 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	335 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	333 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	333 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (317 - 337, n=6)	332 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=112, last 2 years)	274 Points -18%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=134, last 2 years)	489 ms * -19%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	420 ms * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	412 ms * -0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (404 - 420, n=7)	412 ms * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	411 ms *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	408 ms * +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	405 ms * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	404 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		8518 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	86978 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	86549 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	85644 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84020 MB/s +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74558 - 86978, n=11)	81710 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	79577 MB/s
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	77500 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=143, last 2 years)	68334 MB/s -14%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	97151 MB/s +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	95542 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	87760 MB/s +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74094 - 97151, n=11)	87360 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	86460 MB/s
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84473 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	83408 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 103347, n=143, last 2 years)	71268 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	85648 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	84581 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82159 MB/s +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72929 - 85648, n=11)	79200 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	77637 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	77505 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	73246 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=143, last 2 years)	70594 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	118.7 ns * -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 125.1, n=11)	111.9 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	111.7 ns * -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	111.2 ns * -1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	110.2 ns *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	109.3 ns * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	107.7 ns * +2%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=143, last 2 years)	98.6 ns * +11%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

延迟也没有引起任何抱怨。根据 LatencyMon 工具，实时音频和视频处理应该没有问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2296.5 μs * -152%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1516.1 μs * -66%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	1501.6 μs * -65%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1465.8 μs * -61%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB	911.5 μs *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	464.2 μs * +49%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

大容量存储也令人印象深刻。从顺序上看，Phison 内置的 PCIe 5 硬盘最高可达到约 10,000 MB/s，不过你也可以期待 4 TB 的型号，而不是 2 TB 的价格。顶部：与 CPU 性能相比，固态硬盘的性能保持稳定。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Phison E31 2 TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 10121 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6315 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 545.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 452.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4573 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 4438 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 83.02 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 155.6 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	79.9 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	71.6 pt
Average Phison E31 2 TB	68.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	66.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	65.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	63.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	58.5 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	51.4 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5861 (5825.98^min - 5861.12^max) MB/s +48%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (3968 - 4598, n=2)	4283 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	3998 (3658.3^min - 3998.4^max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	3968 (3897.56^min - 3968.05^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (281 - 7663, n=126, last 2 years)	3452 MB/s -13%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	3415 (3349.37^min - 3415.42^max) MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	348 (183.29^min - 348.13^max) MB/s -91%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	331 (68.02^min - 331.14^max) MB/s -92%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	4387 (4285.53^min - 4387.28^max) MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=126, last 2 years)	3859 MB/s +18%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (3272 - 3688, n=2)	3480 MB/s +6%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	3272 (3073.73^min - 3272.14^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	3016 (2843.5^min - 3016.38^max) MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	2759 (2615.78^min - 2759.16^max) MB/s -16%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	2570 (2187.36^min - 2569.74^max) MB/s -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1922 (1819.62^min - 1921.76^max) MB/s -41%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	13091 (10532.2^min - 13090.8^max) MB/s +34%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (9744 - 9937, n=2)	9841 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	9744 (8105.91^min - 9743.59^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	7069 (5962.41^min - 7069.08^max) MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	6880 (6106.07^min - 6880.21^max) MB/s -29%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	6766 (5345.22^min - 6765.62^max) MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	6749 (5697.47^min - 6748.77^max) MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 15056, n=126, last 2 years)	6538 MB/s -33%
seq q8 t1 write
Average Phison E31 2 TB (6525 - 8173, n=2)	7349 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	7264 (5656.44^min - 7264.06^max) MB/s +11%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	6525 (4526.28^min - 6524.61^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	6169 (6112.09^min - 6168.56^max) MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	5343 (5220.28^min - 5342.91^max) MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	5275 (5153.09^min - 5274.69^max) MB/s -19%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	5187 (5110.55^min - 5187.31^max) MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 13519, n=126, last 2 years)	5115 MB/s -22%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	77.4 (77.02^min - 77.43^max) MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	75.2 (73.03^min - 75.16^max) MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB (74.5 - 75.2, n=2)	74.9 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	70.9 (23.28^min - 70.91^max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	69.6 (64.94^min - 69.55^max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	68.3 (67.41^min - 68.26^max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (32.9 - 95.9, n=126, last 2 years)	67.3 MB/s -11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	57.4 (57.08^min - 57.42^max) MB/s -24%
4k q1 t1 write
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=126, last 2 years)	217 MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	178.9 (178.49^min - 178.93^max) MB/s +12%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	160.3 (157.41^min - 160.31^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	159.4 (153.59^min - 159.38^max) MB/s -1%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (158.3 - 160.3, n=2)	159.3 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	157 (155.82^min - 156.95^max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	153.8 (106.82^min - 153.79^max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	149.4 (92.02^min - 149.43^max) MB/s -7%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	4760 (4699.8^min - 4760.03^max) MB/s +402%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=126, last 2 years)	2497 MB/s +163%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	982 (747.27^min - 982.13^max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	961 (945.93^min - 961.25^max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	948 (837.88^min - 947.74^max) MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB (908 - 948, n=2)	928 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	722 (696.56^min - 722.01^max) MB/s -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	679 (591.01^min - 678.88^max) MB/s -28%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	4433 (4354.58^min - 4433.43^max) MB/s +699%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 5588, n=126, last 2 years)	2042 MB/s +268%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	572 (544.97^min - 572.01^max) MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	555 (533.82^min - 554.71^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	544 (523.14^min - 543.91^max) MB/s -2%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (513 - 555, n=2)	534 MB/s -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	520 (486.41^min - 520.16^max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	505 (461.27^min - 504.83^max) MB/s -9%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	8857 Points +12%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	7940 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	7590 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	7478 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=123, last 2 years)	6768 Points -15%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (5424 - 7940, n=2)	6682 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	6515 Points -18%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	5355 Points -33%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	3234 Points +84%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=123, last 2 years)	2373 Points +35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2056 Points +17%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	1758 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	1667 Points -5%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (1522 - 1758, n=2)	1640 Points -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	1569 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1541 Points -12%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5936 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	5380 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	5263 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	5036 Points -6%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (3217 - 5380, n=2)	4299 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=123, last 2 years)	3251 Points -40%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	3074 Points -43%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1837 Points -66%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9653 MB/s +41%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	6860.6 MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB (6602 - 6861, n=2)	6731 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	5688.57 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	5315 MB/s -23%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	5105.48 MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 9890, n=123, last 2 years)	5105 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	4260 MB/s -38%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5562 MB/s +23%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	4523.93 MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB (4399 - 4524, n=2)	4461 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 9486, n=123, last 2 years)	3852 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	3812 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	3444 MB/s -24%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	3100.36 MB/s -31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1587.46 MB/s -65%
4K Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	81.6 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	78.94 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	75.6 MB/s -4%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (67.5 - 78.9, n=2)	73.2 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	72.3 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=123, last 2 years)	65.7 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	63.16 MB/s -20%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	54.74 MB/s -31%
4K Write
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	283 MB/s +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	250.73 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	249 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	245.88 MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB (219 - 246, n=2)	232 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	226 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (79.4 - 512, n=123, last 2 years)	215 MB/s -13%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	185.44 MB/s -25%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	2602.02 MB/s +162%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3630, n=123, last 2 years)	1789 MB/s +80%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	1063 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1039 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1010 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	1004.03 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	993.4 MB/s
Average Phison E31 2 TB (795 - 993, n=2)	894 MB/s -10%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5155 MB/s +10%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	4681.46 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	4633 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	4408 MB/s -6%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (2558 - 4681, n=2)	3620 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=123, last 2 years)	2654 MB/s -43%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	2578.56 MB/s -45%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1427.9 MB/s -69%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	0.116 ms * -252%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=122, last 2 years)	0.05642 ms * -71%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	0.054 ms * -64%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.052 ms * -58%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (0.033 - 0.036, n=2)	0.0345 ms * -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	0.033 ms * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	0.033 ms *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	0.032 ms * +3%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	0.073 ms * -387%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	0.06 ms * -300%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=123, last 2 years)	0.0491 ms * -227%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.017 ms * -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	0.016 ms * -7%
Average Phison E31 2 TB (0.015 - 0.016, n=2)	0.0155 ms * -3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB	0.015 ms *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN	0.014 ms * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Power: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Phison E31 2 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø9721 (7725.97-10000.27)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12826 (9538.48-13255.8)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6758 (5656.01-6797.71)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6749 (5892.12-6839.65)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6982 (5720.4-7017.72)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6701 (2591.93-6810.51)

图形处理器性能

与 RTX 5080 相比，RTX 5090 提供了完整的 24 GB GDDR7 VRAM，而不是 16 GB。在 GPU 测试中，Beast 16 X1 提供了非常出色的性能，经常领先竞争对手或之前确定的 RTX 5090 平均值几个百分点。不过，从对手的情况来看，RTX 5080 只落后了一部分。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	99.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	98 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	95.9 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	94.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	91.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	91.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	82.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	59.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	76300 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	73596 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	72215 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	71866 Points -6%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54052 - 76300, n=12)	68735 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	63549 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	61156 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming (10741 - 76300, n=137, last 2 years)	46114 Points -40%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	54791 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	54220 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42516 - 62849, n=13)	52466 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	49297 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	49153 Points -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	49115 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	48891 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (2913 - 62849, n=149, last 2 years)	33158 Points -39%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	25040 Points +4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	24873 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	23967 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (19216 - 25129, n=13)	23684 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	23600 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	23003 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	21571 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (2295 - 25040, n=145, last 2 years)	14019 Points -42%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	16250 Points +3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	16245 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	15788 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (12749 - 17063, n=10)	15756 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	15721 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	14620 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	12068 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (984 - 16250, n=81, last 2 years)	9769 Points -38%

3DMark 11 Performance		54178 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		75355 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		42189 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		22368 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

游戏测试中的情况也类似。在这里，RTX 5090 的性能有时也勉强快于 RTX 5080，尤其是在中等分辨率（全高清）下。

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 ^-1! GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	99.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	97.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	94 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	93.6 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	92.8 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 ^-2! GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	92 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	91.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	70 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	158.5 (122^min) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	156.2 (125.7^min, 114.4^P1) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	154.8 (123.7^min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	153.6 (124.2^min) fps -3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	151.9 (117.7^min, 106.2^P1) fps -4%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (105.3 - 167.3, n=13)	148.2 fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	144.3 (118.2^min) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 164, n=106, last 2 years)	97.3 fps -39%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	211.5 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	201 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	200 (86^min, 110.5^P0.1, 152.2^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (143.1 - 225, n=12)	195.8 fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	193.3 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	180.3 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=73, last 2 years)	130.4 fps -35%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	164.1 (2.25^min, 125^P1) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	164.1 (3.7^min, 100^P1) fps +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	162.8 (3.33^min, 111.1^P1) fps +14%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (121.6 - 186.9, n=10)	154.6 fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	142.4 (3.25^min, 90.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=122, last 2 years)	118.3 fps -17%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	210 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	205 fps
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	203 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	203 fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	194.6 fps -5%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (147.4 - 212, n=12)	193.4 fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	189.6 fps -8%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 212, n=139, last 2 years)	126.5 fps -38%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	188.9 (155.7^min) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	185.6 (154.7^min) fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	176.4 (144.9^min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (137.1 - 248, n=12)	175.9 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	175.5 (149.8^min) fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	167.2 (136.1^min) fps -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	161 (134.6^min) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=142, last 2 years)	152.3 fps -14%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	124.5 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	119.5 fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	115.9 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	114.2 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (85.2 - 133.6, n=12)	114 fps 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	112.6 fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	110.6 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 166.2, n=145, last 2 years)	104.9 fps -8%

在使用 QHD 分辨率时，距离会增加，但最大设置通常仍有足够的余量。在测试的游戏中，只有《F1 25》（带路径追踪）和适度优化的 湮灭重制版没有超过 60 FPS。如果未来情况变得紧张，升级和（多）帧生成将有所帮助。下表显示了性能提升的可能性；包括 DLSS 质量和 FG 在内，《潜行者 2》的帧速率翻了一番 潜行者 2例如

Stalker 2
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	65.4 (48^min, 48.4^P0.1, 53.9^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (59.8 - 65.4, n=2)	62.6 fps -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	59.8 (43.5^min, 47.2^P0.1, 50.8^P1) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming (31.7 - 65.4, n=4, last 2 years)	53.9 fps -18%
2560x1440 Epic Preset + Quality DLSS + FG
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	134.6 (53.6^min, 56.4^P0.1, 70.8^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (124.9 - 134.6, n=2)	129.8 fps -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	124.9 (11.4^min, 54.8^P0.1, 70.7^P1) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (58.3 - 134.6, n=4, last 2 years)	110 fps -18%

Doom: The Dark Ages
2560x1440 Ultra Nightmare AA:T
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	82.1 (53.2^min, 58.4^P0.1, 63.3^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (77 - 82.1, n=2)	79.6 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (41 - 82.1, n=5, last 2 years)	67.4 fps -18%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	65 (51.8^P0.1, 52.5^P1) fps -21%
2560x1440 Ultra Nightmare - DLSS Quality
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	107.3 (80.4^min, 81.6^P0.1, 86.2^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (102.3 - 107.3, n=2)	104.8 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming (89.1 - 107.3, n=4, last 2 years)	98.9 fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	89.1 (72.6^P0.1, 76.3^P1) fps -17%

F1 25
2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (34 - 36.8, n=4)	35.7 fps +5%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 36.8, n=3, last 2 years)	35.5 fps +4%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	34 (19^min) fps
2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset + DLSS Quality AA:DLSS AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (61 - 64, n=2)	62.5 fps +2%
Average of class Gaming (61 - 64, n=2, last 2 years)	62.5 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	61 (37^min) fps

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	41.7 (18.7^min, 21^P0.1, 34^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	41.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (36.6 - 41.7, n=2, last 2 years)	39.2 fps -6%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	59.7 (27^min, 28.7^P0.1, 48.2^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	59.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (53.2 - 59.7, n=2, last 2 years)	56.5 fps -5%

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	86 (71.2^min, 73.4^P0.1, 75.7^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (82.6 - 86, n=2)	84.3 fps -2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	82.6 (69.1^min, 70.2^P0.1, 71.4^P1) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming (74.5 - 86, n=3, last 2 years)	81 fps -6%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	114.5 (83.8^min, 95.5^P0.1, 98.2^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (98.7 - 114.5, n=2)	106.6 fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (98.7 - 114.5, n=3, last 2 years)	104 fps -9%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	98.7 (74.9^min, 78.7^P0.1, 82.3^P1) fps -14%

Until Dawn
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	69.5 (16.3^min, 22.3^P0.1, 40.3^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (65.6 - 69.5, n=2)	67.6 fps -3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	65.6 (18.7^min, 21.9^P0.1, 49.1^P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (32.9 - 69.5, n=4, last 2 years)	56.8 fps -18%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS + Ray Tracing
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	86.3 (20.9^min, 24^P0.1, 40.6^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (79.7 - 86.3, n=2)	83 fps -4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	79.7 (16.5^min, 19^P0.1, 44.3^P1) fps -8%
Average of class Gaming (41.5 - 86.3, n=4, last 2 years)	70.5 fps -18%

Space Marine 2
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	98.6 (62.2^min, 67.7^P0.1, 80.9^P1) fps +1%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (97.2 - 98.6, n=2)	97.9 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	97.2 (67.8^min, 70.8^P0.1, 80.4^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (48.2 - 98.6, n=4, last 2 years)	82.6 fps -15%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	100.8 (66.6^min, 75.5^P0.1, 80.2^P1) fps +3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (97.5 - 100.8, n=2)	99.2 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	97.5 (67.3^min, 72.8^P0.1, 82^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 100.8, n=4, last 2 years)	87.6 fps -10%

Star Wars Outlaws
2560x1440 cinem. ultra
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	61 (31.8^min, 34.1^P0.1, 36.5^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54 - 61, n=2)	57.5 fps -6%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	54 (30.4^min, 30.5^P0.1, 31.3^P1) fps -11%
Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 61, n=4, last 2 years)	47.4 fps -22%
2560x1440 cinem. ultra DLSS
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	70.9 (36.8^min, 37.8^P0.1, 43.1^P1) fps 0%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (70.8 - 70.9, n=2)	70.9 fps 0%
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	70.8 (42.5^min, 44.5^P0.1, 50.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (34.1 - 70.9, n=4, last 2 years)	60.2 fps -15%

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD DLSS	QHD
GTA V (2015)		187.5	185.3	142.4		133.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	234	204	193	176.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		234	205			172.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	161.6	139.2	114.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)		217	202	200		151
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)		188.1	171.9	158.5		110.8
Star Wars Outlaws (2024)		79.3	72.7	70	70.8	61
Space Marine 2 (2024)		102.8	102.1	101.4	97.5	97.2
Until Dawn (2024)		109.9	102.4	93.9	86.3	69.5
Stalker 2 (2024)		106.1	92.6	81.8	134.6	65.4
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025)		195.8	165.7	118.5	114.5	86
Civilization 7 (2025)		231	225			184.9
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025)		118.4	104.2	57.5	59.7	41.7
Doom: The Dark Ages (2025)		124.3	113.9	111.3	107.3	82.1
F1 25 (2025)		256	241	57	61	34

长时间 GPU 负载会导致 Beast 16 X1 的性能略有下降。不过，FPS 损失有限。我们的赛博朋克-测试说明了这一现象（红线）。

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS-Diagram

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø146 (136.1-155)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø148.8 (139-150.3)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø151.4 (144.3-153.7)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø144.4 (132.4-147.8)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop: Ø140.9 (134-145)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop: Ø128.4 (121.7-130.5)

排放量

噪音排放

16 英寸机身在负载情况下的音量与竞争对手不相上下。在典型游戏模式下，55 分贝（A）以下的噪音清晰可闻，需要佩戴耳机。在空闲模式下，Medion 笔记本电脑要安静得多，风扇的噪音通常在 25 到 29 分贝（A）之间。

Noise Level

Idle		25 / 27 / 29 dB(A)
Load		52 / 55 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Noise		1%	-3%	1%	12%	2%
off / environment *	24	24 -0%	22.8 5%	23.8 1%	22.9 5%	24 -0%
Idle Minimum *	25	26 -4%	29 -16%	29 -16%	22.9 8%	24 4%
Idle Average *	27	26 4%	29 -7%	29 -7%	22.9 15%	30.1 -11%
Idle Maximum *	29	26 10%	29 -0%	29 -0%	26.3 9%	30.1 -4%
Load Average *	52	52.4 -1%	47.7 8%	40.5 22%	27.8 47%	41.1 21%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	55	55.4 -1%	54.8 -0%	53.6 3%	54.2 1%	54.2 1%
Load Maximum *	55	55.4 -1%	61.1 -11%	53.6 3%	53.9 2%	54.2 1%

* ... smaller is better

温度

虽然 Beast 16 X1 在空闲模式（最高 30 °C/86°F）下保持凉爽宜人，但在负载较重的情况下，外壳表面最高温度可达 49 °C（120.2 °F/顶部）和 45 °C（113 °F/底部），与同类产品相比，这两个温度值既不算高，也不算低。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


46 °C	49 °C	43 °C
46 °C	46 °C	39 °C
37 °C	35 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 41.4 °C


42 °C	44 °C	45 °C
39 °C	44 °C	39 °C
34 °C	35 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 39.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 50 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


29 °C	30 °C	30 °C
30 °C	29 °C	29 °C
29 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 29.1 °C


30 °C	30 °C	29 °C
29 °C	29 °C	30 °C
28 °C	29 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 29.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


45 °C	46 °C	42 °C
44 °C	45 °C	38 °C
33 °C	36 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 40.2 °C


46 °C	47 °C	45 °C
41 °C	44 °C	40 °C
38 °C	36 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 41.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 49 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).

	Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Heat		2%	6%	-7%	1%	8%
Maximum Upper Side *	49	47.8 2%	42.8 13%	44.2 10%	42.6 13%	39.6 19%
Maximum Bottom *	45	46.7 -4%	50.2 -12%	48.1 -7%	41.2 8%	49.7 -10%
Idle Upper Side *	30	28.4 5%	27.6 8%	33 -10%	32.6 -9%	26.3 12%
Idle Bottom *	30	28.9 4%	26.2 13%	36.1 -20%	32.4 -8%	27.3 9%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

我们使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 工具进行了压力测试，CPU 和 GPU 的温度控制在 80 °C（176 °F）左右，可以接受。在《赛博朋克 2077》中，由于时钟频率较高，温度略高。

发言人

以笔记本电脑的标准来看，Beast 16 X1 的音响系统好得出奇，丝毫不落后于竞争对手。与惠普 Omen Max 16 相比，最大音量也更大。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理

能源消耗

关于能耗，结论是矛盾的。虽然在闲置模式下，Beast 16 X1 比竞争对手更经济，但在 3D 模式下的能耗略高于平均水平。注：连接外部显示器时，dGPU 会自动激活。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 0.8 Watt
Idle	13.1 / 17.5 / 23 Watt
Load	88 / 428 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-4%	-17%	-40%	-56%	-1%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	13.1	11.8 10%	9.9 24%	22.5 -72%	28.5 -118%	10.8 18%	14.1 ?(2 - 41.5, n=123, last 2 years) -8%
Idle Average *	17.5	15.1 14%	28.6 -63%	32.2 -84%	38.8 -122%	17.7 -1%	20 ?(8 - 55.6, n=123, last 2 years) -14%
Idle Maximum *	23	15.8 31%	47.1 -105%	34.3 -49%	45.6 -98%	18.8 18%	27.1 ?(9 - 101.1, n=123, last 2 years) -18%
Load Average *	88	165.3 -88%	141.8 -61%	169.3 -92%	132.2 -50%	139.4 -58%	105.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=121, last 2 years) -20%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	299	296 1%	253 15%	294 2%	318 -6%	295 1%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	297	289 3%	230 23%	288 3%	319 -7%	291 2%
Load Maximum *	428	415.5 3%	233 46%	371.5 13%	384 10%	359.3 16%	255 ?(64.5 - 431, n=123, last 2 years) 40%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø283 (237-428)

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø17.5 (13.1-23)

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø299 (281-315)

Power consumption with external Monitor

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø93.9 (90.8-98.7)

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø149.4 (95.9-273)

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø219 (215-226)

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø24.9 (19.6-31.5)

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø297 (286-308)

电池寿命

Medion 为这款 16 英寸设备配备了一块 99 Wh 的大容量电池，在我们的 WLAN 测试中（亮度降低到 150 cd/m²），它的续航时间略低于 8 小时，这一相对较好的成绩与 ROG Strix G16（90 Wh）几乎是 1:1。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

7h 54min

	Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.8 Wh	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 83 Wh	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh	Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		21%	-26%	-18%	-32%	-1%	-19%
WiFi v1.3	474	572 21%	350 -26%	388 -18%	323 -32%	469 -1%	386 ?(85 - 889, n=123, last 2 years) -19%
H.264		460				658	453 ?(129 - 898, n=53, last 2 years)
Load		121	71		48	88	84.8 ?(41 - 164, n=80, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle			522				570 ?(239 - 1290, n=44, last 2 years)
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd						48

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 是一款高品质的游戏和创作型笔记本电脑，拥有绚丽的显示屏和强劲的性能，但噪音也很高。

Back to the verdict

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate - 05/30/2025 v8
Florian Glaser

Chassis

88 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard

89%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

79 / 80 → 98%

Weight

58 / 10-68 → 82%

Battery

79 / 95 → 83%

Display

91%

Games Performance

92%

Application Performance

93%

AI Performance

90%

Temperature

84 / 95 → 88%

Noise

61 / 90 → 67%

Audio

84%

Camera

36 / 75 → 47%

Average

62%

89%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
25%

Power Use
75.2%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 28.8%

可比较的替代品

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K Ultra 5 245K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	1472
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1479
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU	1532
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1547
HP Z2 Mini G9-996Q4ET i7-14700K, RTX A2000	1559
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G834JYR (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1592
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	1597
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	53282
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	53735
R9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	53915
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	54178
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 R5 7600, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	54220
Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER	54278
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F Ultra 5 225F, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	54377
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论 - 速度最快的 RTX 5090 笔记本之一

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

住房

尺寸比较

设备

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备

显示屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

大容量存储器

Continuous Power: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形处理器性能

游戏性能

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS-Diagram

排放量

噪音排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate audio analysis

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 audio analysis

能源管理

能源消耗

Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test

Power consumption with external Monitor

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可比较的替代品

More articles related to this device

Transparency