搭载4K Mini-LED、RTX 5090和128 GB内存的游戏怪兽——华硕ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG评测
顶级游戏体验，性能毫不妥协。
华硕正在对其 ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG 进行升级，搭载英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 290HX 处理器、 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本显卡，以及一款具备 240 Hz 刷新率和 2,000 个调光分区的 18 英寸 4K Mini-LED 显示屏。此外，得益于简化的组件访问方式，以及 AniME Vision 提供的丰富定制选项和多功能 RGB 灯效，该机型还具备出色的可维护性。Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论——游戏性能卓越，缺点极少
华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG 是目前市场上性能最强大的游戏笔记本电脑之一。 该测试机型搭载英特尔酷睿Ultra 9 290HX处理器、TGP为175瓦的NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090笔记本显卡以及128 GB内存，为最新的3A大作、专业内容创作以及高负载的人工智能任务提供了巨大的性能储备。 即使在持续高负载下，CPU和GPU的性能依然保持稳定。
这款笔记本最大的亮点之一是其18英寸Mini-LED显示屏，具备4K分辨率、2,000个调光分区以及240 Hz刷新率。其出色的锐度、卓越的HDR表现以及极高的峰值亮度令人印象深刻。 唯一的局限在于出厂时的色彩校准，不过通过校准可以显著改善。此外，240 Hz刷新率仅在GPU终极模式下可用——在所有其他图形模式下，仍可实现120 Hz刷新率。
机箱也给人以高品质的印象。丰富的RGB灯效（包括AniME Vision）以及便捷的维护性，都突显了其高端魅力。 稍显不足的是主机机身细腻的塑料表面，容易留下指纹，以及在高负载下运行时明显可闻的散热系统噪音。此外，其功耗较高，而电池续航时间在同性能级别中仅属中等。
如果您正在寻找一款不妥协的台式机替代品，且追求极致的游戏和应用性能，华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG 无疑是当前市场上性能最强大的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑之一。 不过，这需要付出极高的购买成本，同时还要忍受较高的噪音和功耗——这在该性能级别的产品中属于典型的取舍。
Pros
+ 卓越的游戏和系统性能
+ 配备 175 瓦 TGP 的 GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑
+ 128 GB DDR5 内存
+ 总存储容量 8 TB（2×4 TB RAID 0）
+ 出色的 18 英寸 Mini-LED 显示屏
+ 两个 Thunderbolt 5 端口
+ 卓越的维护和升级选项
+ 多功能、可自定义的 RGB 和 AniME Vision 灯光效果
+ 按键手感精准、舒适的键盘
Cons
- 游戏运行时噪音较大
- 塑料底座极易留下指纹痕迹
- 满载时功耗较高
- 机箱背面无接口
价格与供货情况
新款华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 预计将于近期上市。
- $7,439.00HIDevolution [2026] ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG 18" 4K 240Hz Mini LED, 2.7 GHz Ultra 9-290HX Plus, RTX 5090, 128 GB DDR5 RAM, 4 TB PCIe SSD, Windows 11 Pro
- $6,284.00HIDevolution [2026] ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG 18" 4K 240Hz Mini LED, 2.7 GHz Ultra 9-290HX Plus, RTX 5090, 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 2 TB PCIe SSD, Windows 11 Home
- $6,019.00HIDevolution [2026] ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG 18" 4K 240Hz Mini LED, 2.7 GHz Ultra 9-290HX Plus, RTX 5090, 64 GB DDR5 RAM, 1 TB PCIe SSD, Windows 11 Home
Table of Contents
华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG 是华硕的旗舰级游戏笔记本电脑，专为对性能有极高要求的用户设计。我们评测的这台机器搭载了英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 290HX处理器和英伟达 GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本显卡，还配备了 128 GB 内存、 两块组成RAID 0阵列的高速4 TB固态硬盘，以及一块刷新率为240 Hz的18英寸Mini-LED显示屏。这使得这款高端笔记本既能胜任高负载游戏，也同样适合专业内容创作。
规格
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (Strix Scar 18 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus 24c/24t, 8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core, 16 x 4.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core, 200 W PL2 / Short Burst, 180 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 1597 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, Nvidia 610.62, Advanced Optimus
Memory
128 GB
, DDR5-6400, 2x SO-DIMM, Dual-Channel
Display
18.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 252 PPI, NE180QA1-MM0, Mini LED, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)
Storage
2x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC4T0HBL1 (RAID 0), 8192 GB
, M.2 PCIe, RAID 0, 7280 GB free
Weight
3.605 kg, Power Supply: 821 g
Price
8999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
机箱、功能和输入设备
由于华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG 采用与此前评测过的ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LX 相同的机箱，因此其做工和设计保持不变。 关于机身、接口和输入设备的详细介绍，请参阅我们针对该姊妹机型发布的另一篇评测文章。
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.1.3: Ø3270 (3115-3471) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.1.3: Ø3046 (2765-3114) MBit/s
7.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
显示
华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG 搭载的 18 英寸 Mini-LED 显示屏采用 16:10比例，拥有2,000个调光分区，刷新率达240 Hz。其画质表现令人印象深刻，不仅锐度极高、色彩鲜艳，背光均匀性也十分出色。得益于高刷新率，动态画面呈现极为流畅，这对游戏体验尤为有利。 240 Hz 的最高刷新率仅在“GPU 终极模式”下可用，该模式可通过 Armoury Crate 启用。在所有其他 GPU 模式下，显示器的刷新率均限制在 120 Hz。
华硕提供了多种带局部调光和不带局部调光的显示配置文件，可根据游戏和图像编辑的需求对面板进行定制。 在HDR模式下，该显示屏可实现极高的峰值亮度，并凭借出色的对比度和深邃的黑色表现而受益匪浅。其SDR最大亮度约为600 cd/m²，在同类产品中仍属最亮之列，非常适合在光线明亮的环境中使用。 即使在电池供电模式下，也能保持全亮度显示。与典型的Mini-LED面板一样，其背光采用PWM调光；不过，其频率高达约30 kHz，实际上即使对敏感用户而言，也不太可能造成任何问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NE180QA1-MM0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 662 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 604.4 cd/m² Minimum: 44.1 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 589 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 7.12 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
calibrated: 4.92
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 7.17 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
92.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 1.77
CCT: 6687 K
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG NE180QA1-MM0, Mini LED, 3840x2400, 18", 240 Hz | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 300 Hz | Alienware m18 R2 BOE NE18NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 165 Hz | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 250 Hz | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18", 120 Hz | Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) BOE, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -2% | -2% | -0% | -3% | -5% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1264 | ||||||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 99 -1% | 99 -1% | 97.8 -2% | 99.7 0% | 98.1 -2% | 93.51 -6% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.5 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.86 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 92.8 | 87.2 -6% | 86.9 -6% | 88.9 -4% | 91.6 -1% | 86.2 -7% | 84.33 -9% |
| Response Times | -19% | -53% | -11% | -79% | -486% | -38% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 5.8 ? | 7.4 ? -28% | 7.6 ? -31% | 5.3 ? 9% | 8 ? -38% | 8.6 ? -48% | 11.593 ? -100% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 8 ? | 10.4 ? -30% | 14 ? -75% | 10.4 ? -30% | 17.6 ? -120% | 81.8 ? -923% | 6 ? 25% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 30589 | 20610 ? | 26444 ? | 4832 ? | 2592 ? | ||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 100 | 100 -0% | |||||
| Screen | 50% | 36% | 19% | 38% | 21% | 17% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 600 | 764 27% | 605.4 1% | 271.8 -55% | 722 20% | 467.5 -22% | 548 -9% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 604 | 747 24% | 600 -1% | 275 -54% | 724 20% | 459 -24% | 505 -16% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 84 | 93 11% | 97 15% | 78 -7% | 93 11% | 90 7% | 86 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.1 | 0.62 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.54 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.12 | 1.2 83% | 1.53 79% | 2.48 65% | 3.4 52% | 3.77 47% | 3.81 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.42 | 2.8 73% | 4.15 60% | 5.59 46% | 5.32 49% | 6.12 41% | 7.9 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.92 | 0.56 89% | 1.6 67% | 2.94 40% | 2.54 48% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.17 | 1.5 79% | 2.6 64% | 3.7 48% | 3.8 47% | 3.2 55% | 5.4 25% |
| Gamma | 1.77 124% | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.383 92% | 2.43 91% | 2.062 107% |
| CCT | 6687 97% | 6556 99% | 6843 95% | 6355 102% | 7051 92% | 6478 100% | 7224 90% |
| Contrast (:1) | 7640 | 976 | 1007 | 18050 | 1015 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
19% | -6% /
10% | 2% /
9% | -14% /
9% | -156% /
-70% | -9% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
色域覆盖范围
华硕还为 ROG Strix SCAR 提供了 18 种不同的色彩配置文件。然而，出厂状态下，我们的测试机型显示出相对较大的色差，这意味着其色彩准确度未达到高端笔记本电脑应有的水平。 只有经过校准后，显示屏的表现才显著提升，色差也明显减少，使得这块面板更适合对色彩要求较高的应用场景。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 30589 Hz Amplitude: 100 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 30589 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 30589 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7754 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 提供了三种熟悉的电源模式：“静音”、“性能”和“涡轮”。所有基准测试和测量均采用“涡轮”模式进行，该模式可释放最大性能。 此外，还提供手动模式，在此模式下，用户可以自定义GPU时钟频率和风扇控制等参数。不过，在电池供电模式下无法使用Turbo模式。
| 功耗概况 | CPU TDP | CBR24 多核 | GPU TGP | TimeSpy 图形测试 | CP2077 QHD | 最大风扇噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音 | 100/80 瓦 | 1,953 分 | 95 瓦 | 16,321 分 | 80.2 FPS | 34.8 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 125/100 瓦 | 2,133 分 | 150 瓦 | 23,177 分 | 110.0 FPS | 49 dB(A) |
| 涡轮模式 | 200/180 瓦 | 2,318 分 | 175 瓦 | 25,256 分 | 118.7 FPS | 53.7 dB(A) |
处理器 - Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
英特尔酷睿Ultra 9 290HX是当前Arrow Lake-HX架构中最快的移动处理器之一，专为高端游戏笔记本电脑和移动工作站设计。凭借其卓越的多核性能，它既能轻松应对渲染、视频编辑或软件开发等高负载应用，也能从容运行最新游戏。 在测试中，该处理器表现出了持续稳定的高性能，跻身当前市面上顶尖的笔记本 CPU 之列。在华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 机型中，制造商提供了三种预设性能模式，峰值功耗可达 200 瓦。希望手动调整设置的用户甚至可以为该移动处理器分配高达 240 瓦的功耗。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus: Ø6190 (6119.95-6230.53) Points
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5942 (5879.76-6059.69) Points
Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4163 (3956.09-4227.88) Points
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4743 (4458.81-4807.11) Points
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4064 (3787.52-4673.44) Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4753 (4700.35-4782.4) Points
Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3786 (3488.57-4363) Points
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (37038 - 42661, n=5) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10488 - 42661, n=107, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (2319 - 2415, n=5) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1166 - 2415, n=107, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (14397 - 16433, n=5) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4029 - 16433, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (864 - 913, n=5) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Average of class Gaming (442 - 913, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (5617 - 6330, n=5) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1578 - 6330, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (324 - 350, n=5) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 350, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (79 - 330, n=104, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (79 - 94, n=5) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (103986 - 131933, n=5) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Average of class Gaming (33491 - 148086, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (6562 - 7143, n=5) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7436, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (19855 - 22850, n=6) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6625 - 22850, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (3147 - 3228, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3259, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (23839 - 28263, n=5) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (6460 - 28263, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (2282 - 2357, n=5) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2474, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (38.2 - 44.4, n=5) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Average of class Gaming (11.5 - 44.4, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 88.8, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (38.9 - 68.2, n=5) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3439 - 0.759, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (0.3788 - 0.3951, n=5) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX -1! | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG -1! | |
| Alienware m18 R2 -1! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 -1! | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW -1! | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (34761 - 43239, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10227 - 85542, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (174665 - 218895, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (51376 - 238426, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (8352 - 10115, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2180 - 10115, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (13612 - 14874, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (91215 - 115371, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25115 - 128721, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (127585 - 143205, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (1967 - 2340, n=6) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (18611 - 23843, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5509 - 45446, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (51134 - 65272, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (12271 - 89891, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (7624 - 8765, n=5) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2930 - 11788, n=14, last 2 years) | |
系统与存储性能
华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 在日常使用中表现出色，系统运行速度极快，加载时间极短。应用程序和游戏启动迅速，因此这款笔记本电脑始终给人以极佳的响应体验。通过 Nvidia Advanced Optimus 切换显卡模式时，启动某些游戏会出现短暂延迟；这是由于技术限制所致，但不会对运行造成任何进一步的影响。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 -1! | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) -4! | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW -6! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (11015 - 12414, n=3) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average of class Gaming (5828 - 12414, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (11316 - 11604, n=3) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 11935, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (16305 - 25323, n=3) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6845 - 25323, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (17665 - 19954, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (7602 - 19954, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2177 - 2401, n=3) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1366 - 2409, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1994 - 2213, n=3) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1386 - 2254, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2548 - 2786, n=3) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1343 - 2786, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1766 - 2249, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1226 - 2334, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (354 - 369, n=3) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (220 - 532, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (310 - 336, n=3) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (165 - 354, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (391 - 590, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (393 - 399, n=3) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 12414 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (76912 - 93930, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 129946, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (84638 - 98574, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 118858, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (76094 - 100988, n=6) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 135096, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 259, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (100.7 - 108.4, n=6) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 (v6.85.6300) | |
| Alienware m18 R2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW (v6.92.6600) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在标准化的LatencyMon测试（网页浏览、4K YouTube视频播放和CPU负载）中，华硕ROG Strix SCAR 18 G835LXG展现出了良好的整体性能。仅NVIDIA显卡驱动程序（nvlddmkm.sys）会在视频播放过程中导致延迟增加。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (410 - 11799, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试平台配备了两块 4 TB PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘（三星 PM9E1），总计提供 8 TB 的高速大容量存储空间。 这些硬盘凭借极高的传输速率和极短的访问时间令人印象深刻，使得程序、游戏和大型文件的加载速度特别快。然而，在持续负载下，性能会在一段时间后下降，因此在较长的复制或安装过程中，预计会出现明显的性能损失。
2x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC4T0HBL1 (RAID 0)
Sequential Read:
7949MB/s
Sequential Write:
6179MB/s
4K Read:
75MB/s
4K Write:
204MB/s
4K-64 Read:
1133MB/s
4K-64 Write:
1265MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.027ms
Access Time Write:
0.018ms
Copy ISO:
4055.73MB/s
Copy Program:
1101.83MB/s
Copy Game:
2584.17MB/s
Score Read:
2003Points
Score Write:
2087Points
Score Total:
5040Points
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø17083 (13259.78-17590.28) MB/s
GPU与游戏性能
华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 搭载了英伟达 GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本显卡，配备 24 GB GDDR7 显存。 在我们的测试中，该显卡的最高TGP为175瓦（150瓦 + 25瓦动态增强），使其成为目前最快的配置。游戏和应用程序性能相应地非常出色，即使在高分辨率下运行要求苛刻的游戏，也拥有充足的性能储备。
在手动模式下，可进一步提升显卡和显存的时钟频率，从而使图形性能获得轻微提升。 另一个优点是，即使在持续高负载下，RTX 5090 Laptop的性能依然保持稳定，未出现明显下降。但在电池模式下，可用功耗预算大幅降低，因此GPU性能会明显下降。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 69318 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 145142 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 54427 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 328157 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 79173 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 42509 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 30184 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 24092 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 6277 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (447 - 686, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (428 - 517, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (341 - 404, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (192 - 240, n=5) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Alienware m18 R2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (104.7 - 240, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
帧率图表——《赛博朋克2077》30分钟实测，1920×1080分辨率，超高清预设（FSR关闭）
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø163.1 (152.9-166.7) fps
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø144.2 (124.3-147.1) fps
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 187.7 | 187.1 | 186.8 | 173 | 173.7 | 186.6 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 447 | 428 | 404 | 234 | 193.5 | 170.9 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 238.8 | 217.9 | 207.9 | 194.7 | 193.1 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 234 | 231 | 214 | 174 | 107 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 149.3 | 150.3 | 121.8 | 97.6 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 654 | 500 | 494 | 458 | 354 | 184.5 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 229 | 240 | 212 | 207 | 152.8 | 87.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 209 | 194.8 | 173.3 | 169.4 | 118.7 | 56.1 |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 145.3 | 143.5 | 132.7 | 88.3 | 46 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 363 | 391 | 372 | 163.6 | 109.4 | 54.3 |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 182 | 135 | 107 | 65 | 49 | 29 |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 217 | 183.2 | 164.5 | 152.5 | 122.8 | 75 |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 252 | 206 | 177.7 | 126.8 | 94.4 | 54.7 |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 113 | 111 | 96 | 75 | 64 | 46 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 286 | 266 | 255 | 65.3 | 39.1 | 18.8 |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 191.3 | 149.4 | 121.6 | 69.8 | 49.5 | 28.2 |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 (2025) | 216 | 208 | 170 | 69 | 47 | 31 |
| Pragmata (2026) | 257 | 199.9 | 164.9 | 125 | 71.4 | |
| 007 First Light (2026) | 135 | 128 | 111.8 | 108.2 | 78.6 | 45.9 |
排放与能源
系统噪音
华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 的噪音水平在很大程度上取决于所选的电源模式。日常使用时，建议选择“静音模式”，因为在轻负载下风扇通常会停止运转，笔记本电脑的运行噪音水平较低，令人舒适。即使是在该模式下，也能以适度的背景噪音运行对性能要求较低的游戏。
然而在“涡轮模式”下，风扇会持续运转，并在重负载或游戏过程中达到最高 55.1 dB(A)。因此，进行长时间游戏时建议佩戴耳机。 值得肯定的是，即使在如此高的噪音水平下，散热性能依然保持稳定。仅在少数几项合成GPU基准测试中出现了轻微的电子背景噪音，而在正常运行或游戏过程中则难以察觉。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 30.9 / 31 / 31.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 47.8 / 55.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 8% | 12% | -5% | 10% | 9% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25 | 23.3 7% | 23.4 6% | 23.6 6% | 25 -0% | 22.8 9% | 23.41 6% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 30.9 | 29.8 4% | 23.9 23% | 23.8 23% | 30 3% | 23.8 23% | 25.33 18% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 31 | 29.8 4% | 28.2 9% | 26.1 16% | 36 -16% | 23.8 23% | 25.33 18% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 31.1 | 29.8 4% | 29 7% | 31.5 -1% | 44 -41% | 28 10% | 25.33 19% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 47.8 | 42.9 10% | 36.8 23% | 31.5 34% | 48 -0% | 38 21% | 33.57 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 55.2 | 54.1 2% | 52.1 6% | 49 11% | 57.3 -4% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 55.1 | 53.7 3% | 61.97 -12% | ||||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 55.1 | 53.7 3% | 61.1 -11% | 56.6 -3% | 51 7% | 62.8 -14% | 62.14 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在高负载状态下，华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 的表面温度仍能得到良好控制。我们仅在底面局部区域测得最高 45 °C 的温度。 另一方面，键盘仅略微发热，因此即使在长时间游戏过程中，WASD区域也依然保持着舒适的凉爽感。
在压力测试中，散热系统优先为GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop显卡散热，其TGP在短时间后稳定在约175瓦。 英特尔酷睿Ultra 9 290HX处理器则以约95瓦的功耗并行运行。尽管功耗较高，但CPU和GPU的温度始终保持在安全范围内。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.9 °C / -3.5 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.9 °C / -3.5 F).
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -6% | -14% | -19% | -19% | -6% | -45% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 37.5 | 45.6 -22% | 43.2 -15% | 41.2 -10% | 43 -15% | 37.8 -1% | 51 -36% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 40.9 | 46 -12% | 42.6 -4% | 34.6 15% | 59 -44% | 37.6 8% | 64 -56% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 31.1 | 28.9 7% | 36 -16% | 42.8 -38% | 32 -3% | 34.8 -12% | 42.3 -36% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 30.2 | 29.2 3% | 36.4 -21% | 43.6 -44% | 34 -13% | 36 -19% | 46 -52% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 配备四扬声器系统，整体音质表现良好。人声还原清晰，音乐和电影的播放也得益于其均衡的音效表现。 不过，与某些高端竞品直接对比时，仍有部分系统的音效更为强劲，低音也更浑厚。至于游戏场景，我们仍建议使用耳机，因为在高负载状态下，风扇的噪音相当明显。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
能源管理
华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 并非能效最高的游戏笔记本电脑之一。即使在空闲状态下，由于其强大的硬件配置和高亮度的 Mini-LED 显示屏，其功耗也相对较高。 在满载状态下，系统功耗会短暂达到354瓦，随后稳定在230瓦左右。因此，随附的450瓦电源提供了充足的余量。待机功耗高达19瓦，这有些过高。
功耗与电池续航时间
当然，华硕 ROG Strix SCAR 18 的 90-Wh 电池只能在一定程度上弥补系统的高功耗。在实际的 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款游戏本的续航时间仅为 4 小时。一些竞争对手在这方面的表现更为出色。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.8 / 19.4 Watt |
| Idle | 15.5 / 43.2 / 47.6 Watt |
| Load |
163.9 / 354 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
功耗：赛博朋克 / 压力测试
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø229 (160.4-354) Watt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø37.3 (22.4-50.4) Watt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø254 (249-269) Watt
连接外接显示器时的功耗
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø190.3 (177.2-205) Watt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø190.3 (189.5-191.1) Watt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø73.8 (69.2-99.1) Watt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø189 (187.4-190.8) Watt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø209 (192.1-223) Watt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø33.4 (17.6-51.5) Watt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø241 (237-249) Watt
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh | Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 65% | 32% | 20% | -24% | 27% | -21% | 138% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 3 | 6.6 120% | 5.9 97% | 8.27 ? 176% | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 2.1 | 5.8 176% | 8.32 ? 296% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 4 | 5.5 38% | 4.4 10% | 4.8 20% | 3.2 -20% | 4.2 5% | 3.4 -15% | 7.11 ? 78% |
| Load (h) | 1.5 | 1.2 -20% | 1 -33% | 1.1 -27% | 1.2 -20% | 1.1 -27% | 1.502 ? 0% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 0.7 | 1.1 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG
- 07/24/2026 v8
Sebastian Bade
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可选替代方案对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87.4%  | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835LXG Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 8192 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $7,439.00 HIDevolution [2026] ASUS ROG... 2. $6,284.00 HIDevolution [2026] ASUS ROG... 3. $6,019.00 HIDevolution [2026] ASUS ROG... List Price: 8999€ | 3.6 kg | 35 mm | 18.00" 3840x2400 252 PPI Mini LED |
2. 88%  | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 5799€ | 3.3 kg | 32 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED |
3. 90.5% v7 (old)  | Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 4500 USD | 3.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED |
4. 89.5% v7 (old)  | Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $3,499.99 Dell Alienware m18 R2 Gaming... 2. $2,799.00 Alienware M18 Gaming Laptop ... 3. $3,699.00 Dell Alienware 18 Area-51 Ga... List Price: 3300 USD | 4 kg | 26.7 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
5. 87.1% v7 (old)  | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $23.99 HSSDTECH DC in Power Jack Ch... 2. $84.99 330W Charger for Acer Predat... 3. $899.99 Acer Predator Helios 300 PH3... | 3.3 kg | 29.5 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED |
6. 88.8% v7 (old)  | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 4096 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $6,699.99 msi Titan 18 HX AI 18" 240Hz... 2. $5,699.99 msi Titan 18 HX AI 18" 120Hz... 3. $2,699.99 msi Vector A18 HX 18” 240H... List Price: 5000 USD | 3.6 kg | 32.1 mm | 18.00" 3840x2400 252 PPI Mini-LED |
7. 85.1%  | Schenker Key 17 Pro (M24) Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4273€ | 3.4 kg | 24.9 mm | 17.30" 3840x2160 255 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
