Aorus Master 18 游戏笔记本电脑评测：RTX 5090 带来的代价

Name: Aorus Master 18 AM8H
Brand: Aorus

18 英寸设备是否值得它的高价？

技嘉全力打造 Aorus Master 18：超大迷你 LED 显示屏、箭湖代 24 核处理器、GeForce RTX 5090 以及丰富的内存和固态硬盘配置，这些都应该能吸引狂热的游戏玩家。
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 05/02/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Intel Arrow Lake Nvidia Geforce Blackwell RTX 5000 Laptop / Notebook

结论：RTX 5090 可在大师 18 中大显身手

Aorus Master 18 是一款顶级高端笔记本电脑：光是它的四个机箱风扇就足以说明一切。这也难怪，因为酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和GeForce RTX 5090 都希望或需要相应的冷却效果，但 18 英寸设备在负载情况下确实会变得相当响亮。四个 SO-DIMM 组和三个 M.2 插槽（我们的测试设备有 2x 32 GB DDR5-5600 内存和两个 2 TB SSD）即使对于台式机替代品来说也不差，至少可以在一定程度上证明其超过 5,000 美元的高昂价格是合理的。

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

它的外壳和输入设备看起来不错，甚至非常好，由于采用了 Thunderbolt 5，它的连接选项尤其丰富和现代。其 16:10 格式的微型 LED 面板分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素，刷新率为 240 Hz，即使在 SDR 模式下，也能在大多数情况下显示清晰的图像。制造商还可以做一些改进，尤其是在闲置消耗、系统配置文件调整和连续固态硬盘性能方面。如果你对其高昂的价格和 3D 模式下的噪音没有意见，那么 Aorus Master 18 绝对是游戏和其他 3D 应用程序的强大伴侣。

请注意：您可以在文章末尾找到我们对 RTX 5080 版 Master 18 的视频测试。

Pros

+ 大量维护和升级选项

+ 稳定的 CPU/GPU 性能

+ 色彩准确的亮丽显示屏

+ 现代连接

+ 快速读卡器

+ 良好的音效

Cons

- RTX 5090 有时勉强快于 RTX 4090

- 3D 运行时噪音较大

- 持续负载下的固态硬盘节流

- 能耗高

- 昂贵

价格和供应情况

Aorus Master 18 AM8H 目前在亚马逊的售价为 5994.99 美元。

结论：RTX 5090 可在大师 18 中大显身手
规格
案例
连接性
输入设备
显示屏
性能
排放量
能源管理
Notebookcheck 总评分
Video test of the RTX 5080 version
Possible alternatives compared

规格

Aorus Master 18 AM8H

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 1597 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR7, ForceWare 576.02, Advanced Optimus

Memory

64 GB

, 2x 32 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, four slots (two empty)

Display

18.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 168 PPI, NE180QDM-NM1 (BOE0C58), Mini-LED, HDR1000, G-Sync, Pantone validated, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync

Mainboard

Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)

Storage

Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G, 2048 GB

, two NVMe-SSDs, three M.2 2280 slots (one empty)

Soundcard

Realtek ALC245 @ Intel Arrow Point PCH

Connections

3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Line-In/Out, Card Reader: SD (UHS-II)

Networking

Realtek PCIe 2.5GbE Family Controller (10MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 401 x 287

Battery

99 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: FHD 2 MP

Additional features

Speakers: 4x 2 W, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 400 W Power Supply, GiMATE, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

3.438 kg, Power Supply: 1.143 kg

Price

5000 EUR

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

案例

技嘉 18 英寸笔记本电脑的坚固外壳仅限于塑料材质，但这并不一定会立即引起注意。它的制造质量很好，但并不完美（例如，A 盖的制造工艺可以更好一些）。喜欢奢华照明的用户可以期待正面的明亮 LED 灯带和 RGB 键盘。显示屏的最大开启角度并不宽裕：仅有不到 120° 是相当微小的。另一方面，紧致的铰链能将盖子充分固定到位。

Master 18 的重量为 3.4 千克，与华硕的 18 英寸竞争设备相当。华硕 Strix Scar 18的重量约为 3.3 千克。其尺寸也差不多。

尺寸比较

Alienware m18 R2 MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Aorus Master 18 AM8H Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX DIN A4 ❌

连接性

端口

在连接方面，技嘉笔记本电脑确实有过人之处。两个 Thunderbolt 端口（一个 v4 端口和一个 v5 端口）带有 DisplayPort 和 Power Delivery 功能，别无他求。此外，还有三个符合 3.2 Gen2 标准的经典 USB-A 端口。此外，还有一个音频接口、一个 HDMI 2.1 输出端口和一个功能齐全的 SD 读卡器。一个 2.5 GBit LAN 端口可处理有线网络。

左侧：电源、RJ-45、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen 2、Thunderbolt 5（DP 2.1、PD 3.0）

SD 读卡器

已安装的读卡器速度更快，在顺序读取参考卡时，读卡速度约为 200 MB/s，这一成绩值得称赞。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	190.3 MB/s +2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	186 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	182 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	133 MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 204, n=67, last 2 years)	91.9 MB/s -51%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	83.8 MB/s -55%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	219.7 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	216.5 MB/s +7%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	202 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	193.2 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 258, n=66, last 2 years)	115.5 MB/s -43%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	91.5 MB/s -55%

交流

英特尔的 Wi-Fi 7 芯片（型号 BE200）负责无线连接，在我们的续航测试中取得了良好到非常好的结果。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card	1781 (1669^min, 1680.89^P1 - 1877^max) MBit/s +33%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1660 (1544^min, 1548.64^P1 - 1812^max) MBit/s +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel BE201 320MHz	1660 (1542^min, 1547.8^P1 - 1822^max) MBit/s +24%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1342 (1027^min - 1465^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (469 - 1660, n=28)	1239 MBit/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=118, last 2 years)	1215 MBit/s -9%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW	1011 (514^min - 1160^max) MBit/s -25%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW	791 (736^min - 894^max) MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1736 (1712^min - 1765^max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card	1708 (1681^min, 1682.16^P1 - 1731^max) MBit/s -2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1588 (1563^min, 1565.32^P1 - 1610^max) MBit/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel BE201 320MHz	1587 (1550^min, 1555.51^P1 - 1603^max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1736, n=118, last 2 years)	1399 MBit/s -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (838 - 1736, n=28)	1386 MBit/s -20%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW	1381 (1277^min - 1427^max) MBit/s -20%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW	1116 (932^min - 1352^max) MBit/s -36%

Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1342 (1027-1465)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1660 (1544-1812)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1660 (1542-1822)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1781 (1669-1877)

Alienware m18 R2 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø791 (736-894)

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (514-1160)

Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1735 (1712-1765)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1588 (1563-1610)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1587 (1550-1603)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1708 (1681-1731)

Alienware m18 R2 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1380 (1277-1427)

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1116 (932-1352)

网络摄像头

该设备的 200 万像素网络摄像头可生成清晰的图像，但并不令人印象深刻。在图像清晰度和色彩准确度方面仍有改进的余地。技嘉免去了隐私保护盖。作为回报，制造商的软件提供了各种隐私保护功能（见下面的截图）。

ColorChecker Aorus Master 18 AM8H: 12.76 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 25.2 ∆E

配件

这款笔记本电脑配备了一个笨重的 400 瓦电源装置，重量超过 1 千克。

维护

卸下 13 颗 Torx 螺钉后，即可松开底板（注意：机箱底座正面有用于照明的电线）。一个空的 M.2 插槽和两个空闲的内存组使升级选项成为可能。积极的一面笔记本电脑的散热系统采用蒸发腔技术。

可持续性

有些包装使用了聚丙烯，制造商在这方面可以做得更好。

保修

该设备在美国享有 12 个月的标准保修期。

输入设备

键盘

技嘉安装了带数字键盘的 Chiclet 键盘，打字时感觉不错。虽然我们喜欢它正常大小的方向箭头，但右上角的按键布局（如 Del 和 Ins 之间的距离）需要一些时间来适应。按下特殊的 Gi 键会打开一个对话框，显示制造商自己的 GiMATE AI。您必须自行决定这些功能是否有意义。与此同时，安装的照明设备可以在三个强度级别中进行调节。

触摸板

触摸板的尺寸为 13.4 x 9 厘米，对于 18 英寸的设备来说绰绰有余。不出所料，其光滑的表面确保了良好的滑动性能。它的手势支持也运行良好。下边缘的点击区域似乎有点不稳定（声音和触觉上都是如此），但触发可靠。

显示屏

与华硕的 18 英寸同类产品一样，Master 18 也采用了迷你 LED 面板，像素密度为 2,560 x 1,600 像素，虽然并不出众，但也还过得去。


470 cd/m²	460 cd/m²	448 cd/m²
451 cd/m²	438 cd/m²	422 cd/m²
467 cd/m²	454 cd/m²	448 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

NE180QDM-NM1 (BOE0C58) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 470 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 450.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 428 cd/m²
Contrast: 3369:1 (Black: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
87.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.173

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Aorus Master 18 AM8H NE180QDM-NM1 (BOE0C58), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Alienware m18 R2 BOE NE18NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 165 Hz	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18", 120 Hz
Display		-1%	3%	-2%	-0%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	99 -1%	99.9 0%	96.1 -4%	97.8 -2%	98.1 -2%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	100 0%	99.9 0%	99.5 0%	99.8 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	87.7	87.2 -1%	96.9 10%	85 -3%	88.9 1%	86.2 -2%
Response Times		467%	55%	55%	20%	-259%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	16.4 ?(16.4)	7.4 ?(2.4, 5) 55%	0.22 99%	0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1) 99%	5.3 ?(2.2, 3.1) 68%	8.6 ?(4.2, 4.4) 48%
Response Time Black / White *	8.1 ?(8.1)	10.4 ?(0.6, 9.8) -28%	0.25 97%	0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) 97%	10.4 ?(4.8, 5.6) -28%	81.8 ?(76, 5.8) -910%
PWM Frequency	1398 ?(100)	20610 ?(100) 1374%	960 -31%	960 ?(100) -31%		2592 ?(100) 85%
Screen		44%	-6%	3%	-62%	-51%
Brightness middle	438	764 74%	416 -5%	391 -11%	271.8 -38%	467.5 7%
Brightness	451	747 66%	418 -7%	393 -13%	275 -39%	459 2%
Brightness Distribution	90	93 3%	96 7%	98 9%	78 -13%	90 0%
Black Level *	0.13	0.1 23%			0.27 -108%
Contrast	3369	7640 127%			1007 -70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.25	1.2 4%	1.6 -28%	1.2 4%	2.48 -98%	3.77 -202%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.93	2.8 43%	2.1 57%	3.2 35%	5.59 -13%	6.12 -24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	1.5 12%	2.7 -59%	1.8 -6%	3.7 -118%	3.2 -88%
Gamma	2.173 ^101%	2.17 ^101%	2.16 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.2 ^100%	2.43 ^91%
CCT	6518 ^100%	6556 ^99%	6331 ^103%	6493 ^100%	6355 ^102%	6478 ^100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *					0.56	2.94
Total Average (Program / Settings)		170% / 125%	17% / 12%	19% / 15%	-14% / -35%	-104% / -91%

* ... smaller is better

笔记本电脑 240 Hz 屏幕的优势之一是其丰富的色彩空间覆盖范围。除了 sRGB 之外，它还涵盖了 DCI-P3 的全部内容（以及 AdobeRGB 的 88%）。在 SDR 模式下测试亮度时，我们测得的亮度明显低于制造商规定的值。451 cd/m² 的平均亮度无法接近 Strix Scar 18 的水平，但仍足以满足大多数室内和偶尔室外使用的需求。正如我们的视频测试显示，在激活 HDR 的情况下，其亮度接近技嘉的宣传值。

只要忽略 OLED 的竞争，它的黑阶和对比度一般无需批评。响应时间也是如此。

一个具体的批评点是它的画面闪烁，在每个亮度级别都会出现--但由于闪烁频率很高，这可能只是对极其敏感的人来说是个问题。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.1 ms rise
8.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1398 Hz
Amplitude: 100 %

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1398 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1398 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8456 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能

我们测试的 Master 18 配置属于绝对高端。24 个 CPU 内核、24 GB VRAM、64 GB 内存和 4 TB SSD 容量应能为未来几年提供足够的储备。

测试条件

在 GiMATE 软件中有多种运行模式可供选择。由于这台 18 英寸设备在使用游戏和创意配置文件时声音非常大，因此我们只在平衡模式下进行了测量，该模式下产生的 3D 性能与其他 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑在最大模式下的性能相当。

GiMATE 模式	平衡	游戏	创意	节能
赛博朋克 2077 噪音	52 dB(A)	60 dB(A)	60 dB(A)	49 dB(A)
赛博朋克 2077》性能（FHD/超高清）	152.5fps	159.1fps	158.6fps	121.2fps
Cinebench R15 Multi Score	5096 分	5443 分	5479 分	4834 分
CPU PL1	90 瓦	125 瓦	125 瓦	65 瓦
CPU PL2	120 瓦	150 瓦	150 瓦	100 瓦

处理器

酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 酷睿至尊 9 275HX箭湖系列配备 8 个性能核心和 16 个效率核心，使用平衡配置文件可达到 90 瓦（PL1）和 120 瓦（PL2）。如果综合考虑所有 CPU 基准测试，其性能与旧款酷睿 i9-14900HX.非常好：在我们的 Cinebench 循环中，其结果保持非常稳定，这对其冷却系统非常有利。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø4952 (4898.36-5043.5)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5942 (5879.76-6059.69)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø3112 (3034.67-3332.5)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3489 (3470.41-3505.08)

Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4743 (4458.81-4807.11)

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4753 (4700.35-4782.4)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	86.9 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	80.6 pt
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	77.8 pt
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	76.7 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	74.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	65.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	63.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	59.5 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	39001 Points +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (33449 - 39001, n=7)	35985 Points +7%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	33497 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	32428 (29693.8^min - 32428.3^max) Points -3%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	31391 (28656^min - 31390.7^max) Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	23805 Points -29%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 39690, n=146, last 2 years)	22183 Points -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	22080 Points -34%
Single Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2252 Points +6%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2235 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2126 - 2252, n=7)	2179 Points +2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	2143 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2133 Points 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2126 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2039 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2252, n=146, last 2 years)	1902 Points -11%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	15517 Points +17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (13178 - 15517, n=7)	14167 Points +7%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	13223 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	12103 Points -8%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	11816 Points -11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	9250 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 15524, n=146, last 2 years)	8519 Points -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8251 Points -38%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	866 Points +5%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	853 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (811 - 866, n=7)	841 Points +2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	823 Points 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	821 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	817 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	800 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 866, n=146, last 2 years)	732 Points -11%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6060 (5879.76^min - 6059.69^max) Points +20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (5044 - 6060, n=7)	5666 Points +12%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5044 (4898.36^min - 5043.5^max) Points
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	4807 (4458.81^min - 4807.11^max) Points -5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	4782 (4700.35^min - 4782.4^max) Points -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3505 (3470.41^min - 3505.08^max) Points -31%
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6092, n=149, last 2 years)	3424 Points -32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3333 (3034.67^min - 3332.5^max) Points -34%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	343 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (317 - 343, n=7)	332 Points 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	331 Points
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	318 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	318 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	310 Points -6%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	300 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=146, last 2 years)	281 Points -15%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=140, last 2 years)	169.8 Seconds * -68%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	159 Seconds * -57%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	140 Seconds * -39%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	104 Seconds * -3%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	102 Seconds * -1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	101 Seconds *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (86 - 102, n=7)	92.3 Seconds * +9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	87 Seconds * +14%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	122818 MIPS +12%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	122772 MIPS +12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	121266 MIPS +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (104686 - 122818, n=7)	115328 MIPS +5%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	109737 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 144064, n=144, last 2 years)	84669 MIPS -23%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	83714 MIPS -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	69676 MIPS -37%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	7103 MIPS +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	7027 MIPS +3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6822 MIPS
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6186 - 7036, n=7)	6714 MIPS -2%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	6504 MIPS -5%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=144, last 2 years)	6294 MIPS -8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6252 MIPS -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6136 MIPS -10%

Geekbench 6.4
Multi-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	21668 Points +11%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	19464 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=8)	19288 Points -1%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	18233 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	17207 Points -12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	16652 Points -14%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15671 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 21668, n=125, last 2 years)	14577 Points -25%
Single-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3158 Points +4%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	3057 Points +1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2917 - 3158, n=8)	3042 Points 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3033 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2942 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2923 Points -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	2843 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=125, last 2 years)	2689 Points -11%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	25855 Points +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (21195 - 25855, n=7)	23153 Points +2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	22794 Points
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	21284 Points -7%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	19137 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15818 Points -31%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15407 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 25855, n=143, last 2 years)	15087 Points -34%
Single-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2292 Points +5%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2193 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2034 - 2292, n=7)	2191 Points 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2186 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2136 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2108 Points -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	2098 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=143, last 2 years)	1918 Points -12%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	41.2 fps +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (35 - 41.2, n=7)	38.2 fps +7%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	35.7 fps
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	32.1 fps -10%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	30.9 fps -13%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	28.7 fps -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	25.9 fps -27%
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 43, n=144, last 2 years)	24 fps -33%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	62.1 s *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (36.9 - 88, n=7)	50 s * +19%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=142, last 2 years)	47.7 s * +23%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	46.8 s * +25%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	46.2 s * +26%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	44.8 s * +28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	42.8 s * +31%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	41.3 s * +33%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=145, last 2 years)	0.4374 sec * -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	0.4312 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=7)	0.4172 sec * -1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4139 sec *
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.3979 sec * +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.3943 sec * +5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3919 sec * +5%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3767 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

5044 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

279 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

331 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

13223 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

821 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2126 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

33497 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	96.1 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	90.6 pt
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82.6 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.2 pt
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	77.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	64.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	59.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	39458 KRay/s +21%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	37324 KRay/s +14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (32615 - 39551, n=7)	36971 KRay/s +13%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	32615 KRay/s
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	29351 KRay/s -10%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	29280 KRay/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=144, last 2 years)	23852 KRay/s -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	23492 KRay/s -28%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	194867 Points +17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (166245 - 194867, n=7)	184460 Points +11%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	166245 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148888 Points -10%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	142791 Points -14%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	142039 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	116017 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=144, last 2 years)	112309 Points -32%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9482 MB/s +21%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (7829 - 9482, n=7)	8917 MB/s +14%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	7829 MB/s
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7229 MB/s -8%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7095 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	5824 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	5206 MB/s -34%
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=144, last 2 years)	5115 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148773 Points +19%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	139608 Points +12%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	139323 Points +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (125013 - 139608, n=7)	134856 Points +8%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	125013 Points
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=144, last 2 years)	116065 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88891 Points -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	64720 Points -48%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	19115 Points +44%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18256 Points +38%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16279 Points +23%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	14112 Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12272 - 14112, n=7)	13571 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 32988, n=144, last 2 years)	13531 Points +2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	13238 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9089 Points -31%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	104057 Points +19%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (87156 - 104057, n=7)	97448 Points +12%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	87156 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	75107 Points -14%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	72594 Points -17%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	72355 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	61884 Points -29%
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=144, last 2 years)	57178 Points -34%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138830 MB/s +16%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	134920 MB/s +13%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134675 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (118108 - 134920, n=7)	129230 MB/s +8%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	119356 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=144, last 2 years)	107846 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82547 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	79949 MB/s -33%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2220 MB/s +17%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2149 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1896 - 2220, n=7)	2077 MB/s +9%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2053 MB/s +8%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1898 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1514 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=144, last 2 years)	1386 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1233 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	21372 KRay/s +21%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	20284 KRay/s +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (17631 - 21372, n=7)	20005 KRay/s +13%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	17631 KRay/s
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16128 KRay/s -9%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16104 KRay/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	12887 KRay/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=144, last 2 years)	12809 KRay/s -27%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	58622 MPixel/s +18%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	56601 MPixel/s +14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (47726 - 56613, n=7)	51600 MPixel/s +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	51417 MPixel/s +4%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49716 MPixel/s 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	49511 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=144, last 2 years)	40503 MPixel/s -18%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	33960 MPixel/s -31%

系统性能

笔记本电脑的系统性能似乎尚未完全成熟。众所周知，在笔记本电脑上打开带有图形切换功能的程序时会出现短暂的死机现象。但在 Master 18 上，这些冻结的时间和频率都高于平均水平，这可能是由于其图形驱动程序造成的，因为在我们的测试过程中，这款 18 英寸设备在玩游戏时有时会出现黑屏。后者似乎在 Nvidia 的 Blackwell 代显卡上出现得更为频繁。

PCMark 10 / Score
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	9234 Points +7%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	8968 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	8864 Points +3%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	8623 Points 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	8608 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (8241 - 8794, n=4)	8567 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	8254 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=130, last 2 years)	7905 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	11628 Points +5%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	11415 Points +3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	11081 Points
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	10966 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years)	10763 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9994 - 11081, n=4)	10753 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	10717 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	10626 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	11415 Points +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	11309 Points +22%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	10341 Points +11%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	10225 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=130, last 2 years)	9894 Points +6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	9444 Points +2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	9304 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9122 - 9444, n=4)	9293 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (16344 - 18445, n=4)	17095 Points +2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	16802 Points 0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	16788 Points
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	16462 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	16398 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	15593 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	13889 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 19351, n=130, last 2 years)	12752 Points -24%

CrossMark / Overall
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2282 Points
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2221 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1995 - 2282, n=4)	2188 Points -4%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	2073 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2064 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=111, last 2 years)	1914 Points -16%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1877 Points -18%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2119 Points
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2025 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1847 - 2119, n=4)	2024 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1918 Points -9%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	1881 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=111, last 2 years)	1815 Points -14%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1738 Points -18%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2606 Points +4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2496 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2285 - 2606, n=4)	2460 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2416 Points -3%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	2393 Points -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2195 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=111, last 2 years)	2103 Points -16%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2181 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1673 - 2181, n=4)	1952 Points -10%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1813 Points -17%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	1806 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=111, last 2 years)	1710 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1604 Points -26%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1478 Points -32%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	346 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (315 - 359, n=5)	342 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	333 Points +6%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	327 Points +4%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	326 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	321 Points +2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	315 Points
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=124, last 2 years)	304 Points -3%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	335 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (317 - 335, n=2)	326 Points +3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	317 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	311 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	309 Points -3%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	287 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	268 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 336, n=109, last 2 years)	268 Points -15%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming (404 - 674, n=136, last 2 years)	498 ms * -19%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	452 ms * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	450 ms * -7%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	430 ms * -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	429 ms * -2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	420 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (409 - 420, n=5)	414 ms * +1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	409 ms * +3%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		8608 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	97515 MB/s +31%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	93640 MB/s +26%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84432 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74558 - 86549, n=7)	81241 MB/s +9%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	79243 MB/s +6%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	74558 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=144, last 2 years)	66886 MB/s -10%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	56992 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	102937 MB/s +39%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	86194 MB/s +16%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85791 MB/s +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74094 - 95542, n=7)	84871 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	78309 MB/s +6%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	74094 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 102937, n=144, last 2 years)	69761 MB/s -6%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	54443 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	103860 MB/s +42%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82198 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72929 - 84581, n=7)	77978 MB/s +7%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77089 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	75293 MB/s +3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	72929 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=144, last 2 years)	69112 MB/s -5%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	51387 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	128.7 ns * -3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	125.1 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (108.9 - 125.1, n=7)	113.8 ns * +9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	108.9 ns * +13%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	105 ns * +16%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	103.6 ns * +17%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=144, last 2 years)	97.5 ns * +22%
Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86.4 ns * +31%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

与许多笔记本电脑一样，它的延迟值也是引起抱怨的一个原因，尽管受此问题影响的用户可能很少。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	3220.2 μs * -52%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	2815.1 μs * -33%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2384.5 μs * -12%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2122.9 μs *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	810 μs * +62%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	492.6 μs * +77%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试配置配备了两块金士顿固态硬盘，每块容量为 2 TB。在我们的测试中，M.2 双核固态硬盘实际上达到了非常高的速度，但在我们的 DiskSpd 循环中却出现了节流现象。在这种情况下，更好的固态硬盘散热可能会有所帮助。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7021 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6645 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1136 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 1013 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4377 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 5598 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 78.97 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 319.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	80 pt
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	78.1 pt
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	62.3 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	59.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	59 pt
Average of class Gaming	53.9 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	50.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	48.4 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	5588 (5540.05^min - 5587.65^max) MB/s +26%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	5424 (5395.57^min - 5423.86^max) MB/s +22%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	4436 (4223.24^min - 4435.83^max) MB/s
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	3799 (23.02^min - 3799.36^max) MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3790 (2816.71^min - 3789.94^max) MB/s -15%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (1176 - 4547, n=10)	3514 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming (348 - 7045, n=126, last 2 years)	3442 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1607 (236.92^min - 1606.84^max) MB/s -64%
seq write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	7291 (7191.64^min - 7291.38^max) MB/s +29%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5665 (5398.49^min - 5664.61^max) MB/s
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	5153 (5139.7^min - 5152.91^max) MB/s -9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	4437 (4373.88^min - 4437.36^max) MB/s -22%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (1530 - 5916, n=10)	4351 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=126, last 2 years)	3859 MB/s -32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	3794 (3585.08^min - 3793.54^max) MB/s -33%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3362 (2028.5^min - 3361.51^max) MB/s -41%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	13588 (10727.3^min - 13588.3^max) MB/s +93%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	12470 (11207.2^min - 12469.7^max) MB/s +77%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	7110 (6256.85^min - 7110.18^max) MB/s +1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	7041 (6553.91^min - 7041.4^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	6780 (5762.77^min - 6780.16^max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=126, last 2 years)	6288 MB/s -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	6278 (5683.91^min - 6278.45^max) MB/s -11%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (1987 - 7433, n=10)	6112 MB/s -13%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	10571 (10519.3^min - 10571.3^max) MB/s +58%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	8696 (8611.54^min - 8696.26^max) MB/s +30%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	6779 (6710.47^min - 6778.83^max) MB/s +1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	6687 (6635.39^min - 6687.03^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	5861 (4855.26^min - 5860.72^max) MB/s -12%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (1084 - 6911, n=10)	5335 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=126, last 2 years)	4931 MB/s -26%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	4844 (4270.43^min - 4843.96^max) MB/s -28%
4k q1 t1 read
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	84.2 (81.84^min - 84.15^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	78.7 (77.61^min - 78.69^max) MB/s -7%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	75.4 (73.49^min - 75.43^max) MB/s -10%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (48.5 - 88.5, n=10)	72.1 MB/s -14%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	69.6 (68.6^min - 69.57^max) MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	69.2 (68.61^min - 69.17^max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 95.9, n=126, last 2 years)	67 MB/s -20%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	63.4 (62.2^min - 63.4^max) MB/s -25%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	316 (303.42^min - 316.13^max) MB/s
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	300 (297.27^min - 299.6^max) MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	265 (258.55^min - 264.55^max) MB/s -16%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (74 - 340, n=10)	241 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=126, last 2 years)	223 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	165.3 (162.66^min - 165.27^max) MB/s -48%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	152.1 (149.74^min - 152.09^max) MB/s -52%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	136.4 (134.95^min - 136.4^max) MB/s -57%
4k q32 t16 read
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	6067 (5596.15^min - 6066.73^max) MB/s +57%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	3875 (3785.96^min - 3874.69^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3189 (3182.48^min - 3189.1^max) MB/s -18%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (324 - 4221, n=10)	3046 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=126, last 2 years)	2628 MB/s -32%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1623 (1464.8^min - 1623.24^max) MB/s -58%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	848 (703.36^min - 848.14^max) MB/s -78%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	746 (519.37^min - 746.01^max) MB/s -81%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5588 (5220.61^min - 5587.73^max) MB/s
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	4176 (3805.57^min - 4175.9^max) MB/s -25%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (142.2 - 5588, n=10)	3316 MB/s -41%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2210 (729.15^min - 2210.24^max) MB/s -60%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 5588, n=126, last 2 years)	2166 MB/s -61%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1377 (1306.51^min - 1377.05^max) MB/s -75%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	456 (68.45^min - 456.36^max) MB/s -92%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	284 (254.39^min - 283.58^max) MB/s -95%

AS SSD
Score Total
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	10655 Points +7%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	9943 Points
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (1396 - 12055, n=9)	8178 Points -18%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	7379 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=120, last 2 years)	6784 Points -32%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	5369 Points -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	4945 Points -50%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	4764 Points -52%
Score Read
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	4308 Points
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	3753 Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3215 Points -25%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (504 - 4308, n=9)	3067 Points -29%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=120, last 2 years)	2459 Points -43%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2194 Points -49%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1653 Points -62%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1569 Points -64%
Score Write
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	4993 Points +44%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (631 - 5774, n=9)	3570 Points +3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	3466 Points
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=120, last 2 years)	3133 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2635 Points -24%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2571 Points -26%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2267 Points -35%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	2092 Points -40%
Seq Read
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	9576.8 MB/s +68%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	5916.27 MB/s +4%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5700.22 MB/s
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	5595 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	5081 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=120, last 2 years)	4972 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	4884 MB/s -14%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (1233 - 6252, n=9)	4818 MB/s -15%
Seq Write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	8685.54 MB/s +77%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	5929.42 MB/s +21%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	5305 MB/s +8%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	4899.55 MB/s
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (1125 - 6126, n=9)	4179 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	4160 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=120, last 2 years)	3825 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	3282 MB/s -33%
4K Read
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	107.92 MB/s
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (28.1 - 107.9, n=9)	78.4 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	72.1 MB/s -33%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=120, last 2 years)	65.6 MB/s -39%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	65.1 MB/s -40%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	64.97 MB/s -40%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	64.4 MB/s -40%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	63.69 MB/s -41%
4K Write
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	299.9 MB/s
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	238.28 MB/s -21%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	230 MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	217 MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming (79.4 - 512, n=120, last 2 years)	215 MB/s -28%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (40.8 - 300, n=9)	213 MB/s -29%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	189.8 MB/s -37%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	134.66 MB/s -55%
4K-64 Read
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	3630.4 MB/s
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	3096 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2642 MB/s -27%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (353 - 3630, n=9)	2507 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3630, n=120, last 2 years)	1888 MB/s -48%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1172.14 MB/s -68%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1029 MB/s -72%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1009 MB/s -72%
4K-64 Write
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	4161.9 MB/s +56%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (478 - 4913, n=9)	2939 MB/s +10%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	2676.31 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=120, last 2 years)	2540 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2090 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	1926 MB/s -28%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1546 MB/s -42%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	1088.59 MB/s -59%
Access Time Read
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	0.067 ms * -131%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=119, last 2 years)	0.05676 ms * -96%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	0.051 ms * -76%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (0.027 - 0.073, n=9)	0.04578 ms * -58%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	0.036 ms * -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	0.035 ms * -21%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	0.029 ms * -0%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	0.029 ms *
Access Time Write
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)	0.091 ms * -550%
Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N	0.055 ms * -293%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=120, last 2 years)	0.05087 ms * -263%
Average Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G (0.014 - 0.102, n=9)	0.035 ms * -150%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	0.021 ms * -50%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB	0.019 ms * -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	0.019 ms * -36%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	0.014 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Aorus Master 18 AM8H Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4296 (1092.11-7053.77)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12242 (10589.57-12452.94)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6269 (5613.96-6306.73)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6908 (5460.14-6935.25)

Alienware m18 R2 SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7089 (6353.66-7123.8)

MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG 2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12928 (8511.29-13109.92)

图形卡

尽管没有使用最大运行模式，但在合成图形测试中，Master 18 是我们目前测试过的最快的 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑，尽管差距或差距相当小。不过，这也揭示了老一代的 RTX 4090几乎没有落后--至少在与微星泰坦 18和 Alienware m18 R2.通常情况下 GeForce RTX 5090拥有 10,496 个着色器单元、24 GB DDR7 VRAM 和高达 175 瓦的 TGP（包括动态提升）。Nvidia 喜欢将多帧生成作为其最大的卖点之一。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	96.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	96 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	95.3 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	95.2 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.1 pt
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	90.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	78.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	59.4 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	72141 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	70760 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	69254 Points -4%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54052 - 72215, n=7)	68136 Points -6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	66337 Points -8%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	63978 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	54052 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming (10741 - 72215, n=138, last 2 years)	44543 Points -38%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	52065 Points +9%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50532 Points +6%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42516 - 60880, n=9)	49826 Points +4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	48863 Points +2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	47806 Points
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	44492 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	42516 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (2913 - 56116, n=151, last 2 years)	32058 Points -33%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	24599 Points +3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	23960 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (19216 - 25129, n=9)	23465 Points -2%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	22290 Points -7%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	22256 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	22082 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	19216 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming (2295 - 24873, n=147, last 2 years)	13516 Points -44%

3DMark 11 Performance		50464 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		278456 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		72337 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		36895 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		22138 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=137, last 2 years)	35 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	19 Seconds *
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds *
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	18 Seconds *
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 19, n=6)	16.7 Seconds *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	16 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=144, last 2 years)	290 Seconds * -79%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	259 Seconds * -60%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	210 Seconds * -30%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	180 Seconds * -11%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	179 Seconds * -10%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (125 - 259, n=9)	163.8 Seconds * -1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	162 Seconds *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	137 Seconds * +15%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

18 英寸设备在我们的游戏测试中表现同样出色，与 Strix Scar 18 并驾齐驱。即使是要求苛刻的游戏，如 星球大战亡命之徒在 QHD 下也能以接近 60fps 或更高的速度运行--注意是在全设置下。包括升频在内的数值可在下面的概览表中找到。从技术上讲，RTX 5090 通常有足够的储备来支持 4K，不过在紧急情况下可以或应该使用 DLSS 或（多）帧生成技术。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	96.1 pt
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	94.6 pt
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	91.8 pt
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	90.6 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H	73.6 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	71.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	65 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	154.9 (126.3^min) fps +2%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	152.5 (120^min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (105.3 - 157.5, n=7)	141.6 fps -7%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	133.9 (67.5^min) fps -12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	129.8 (26.2^min) fps -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H	112.3 (87.5^min) fps -26%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	105.3 (74.7^min) fps -31%
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 158, n=95, last 2 years)	91.3 fps -40%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	207.7 fps +6%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	202 fps +3%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	196.2 (73^min, 121.6^P0.1, 161.9^P1) fps
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	193.7 fps -1%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (143.1 - 225, n=6)	187.1 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	162 fps -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H	143.1 fps -27%
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 212, n=61, last 2 years)	116.4 fps -41%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	166.1 (3.18^min, 125^P1) fps
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	161.9 (2.78^min, 111.1^P1) fps -3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (121.6 - 166.1, n=4)	146.6 fps -12%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	139.2 (3.73^min, 90.9^P1) fps -16%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	137 (7.81^min, 83.3^P1) fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H	136.6 (3.95^min, 90.9^P1) fps -18%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	121.6 (8.28^min, 83.3^P1) fps -27%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 168.2, n=123, last 2 years)	114.7 fps -31%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	201 fps
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	199.3 fps -1%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	193.2 fps -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	184 fps -8%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (147.4 - 203, n=6)	183 fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H	154.4 fps -23%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	147.4 fps -27%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 210, n=138, last 2 years)	120.9 fps -40%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	418 (112^min, 292^P1) fps
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	401 (103.4^min, 236^P1) fps -4%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	385 (27.2^min, 274^P1) fps -8%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (308 - 464, n=6)	382 fps -9%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	369 (31.4^min, 266^P1) fps -12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	319 (126.4^min, 227^P1) fps -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H	308 (45.6^min, 231^P1) fps -26%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 434, n=134, last 2 years)	233 fps -44%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	186.6 (157.4^min) fps +10%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	174.5 (151.1^min) fps +2%
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	171.8 (143.6^min) fps +1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	170.3 (143.1^min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (137.1 - 186.6, n=8)	166.8 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=141, last 2 years)	150.1 fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H	141.9 (124.2^min) fps -17%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	137.1 (113.2^min) fps -19%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Alienware m18 R2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	140.6 fps +28%
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	126.1 fps +15%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	121.7 fps +11%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (85.2 - 129.8, n=8)	110.6 fps +1%
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	110 fps
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 166.2, n=144, last 2 years)	104.5 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H	91.4 fps -17%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	85.2 fps -23%

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD DLSS	QHD
GTA V (2015)		186.7	182.5	166.1		164.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	225	195.2	187.5	170.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		226	201			160.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	153.2	136.1	110
Strange Brigade (2018)		475	450	418		308
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)		224	198.5	196.2		139.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)		181.6	166.8	152.5		104.8
Counter-Strike 2 (2023)		390	327	275		224
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024)		358	358	357		357
Helldivers 2 (2024)		157.7	157.3	153.8		140.1
Horizon Forbidden West (2024)		160.3	121.6	120.3	116.6	95
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024)			99.3			93.4
Ghost of Tsushima (2024)		119.6	115.1	104.2	105.2	84.9
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024)		96.8	76.6		81.9	56.2
F1 24 (2024)		335	305	139		95
Star Wars Outlaws (2024)		91.1	82.9	71.6	70.9	54
Space Marine 2 (2024)		104.1	103.1	100.8	100.8	98.6
Until Dawn (2024)		110.6	96.9	87.5	79.7	65.6
Stalker 2 (2024)		100	88.1	76.3	124.9	59.8
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025)		184.3	151.7	108	98.7	82.6
Civilization 7 (2025)		206	203			171.3

Stalker 2
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	59.8 (43.5^min, 47.2^P0.1, 50.8^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	59.8 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (31.7 - 59.8, n=2, last 2 years)	45.8 fps -23%
2560x1440 Epic Preset + Quality DLSS + FG
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	124.9 (11.4^min, 54.8^P0.1, 70.7^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	124.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (58.3 - 124.9, n=2, last 2 years)	91.6 fps -27%

Horizon Forbidden West
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	95 (77^min, 79.2^P0.1, 82.8^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	95 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (24.1 - 98, n=10, last 2 years)	60.9 fps -36%
2560x1440 Very High Preset + DLSS Quality
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	116.6 (53.9^min, 59.1^P0.1, 99.6^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	116.6 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (n=1last 2 years)	116.6 fps 0%

Ghost of Tsushima
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	84.9 (48^min, 65.3^P0.1, 70.4^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	84.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (22.7 - 84.9, n=6, last 2 years)	50.9 fps -40%
2560x1440 Very High Preset + Quality DLSS
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	105.2 (50.2^min, 57.8^P0.1, 85.1^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	105.2 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (63.6 - 105.2, n=4, last 2 years)	78.2 fps -26%

Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
2560x1440 High Preset
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	56.2 (23.2^min, 49.5^P0.1, 52.4^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	56.2 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (27.1 - 57.3, n=5, last 2 years)	42.9 fps -24%
2560x1440 High Preset + Quality DLSS
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	81.9 (72.2^min, 74.6^P0.1, 77.6^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	81.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (42.2 - 83.1, n=4, last 2 years)	63.8 fps -22%

Star Wars Outlaws
2560x1440 cinem. ultra
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	54 (30.4^min, 30.5^P0.1, 31.3^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	54 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 54, n=2, last 2 years)	38.7 fps -28%
2560x1440 cinem. ultra DLSS
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	70.9 (36.8^min, 37.8^P0.1, 43.1^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	70.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (34.1 - 70.9, n=2, last 2 years)	52.5 fps -26%

Until Dawn
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	65.6 (18.7^min, 21.9^P0.1, 49.1^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	65.6 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (32.9 - 65.6, n=2, last 2 years)	49.3 fps -25%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS + Ray Tracing
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	79.7 (16.5^min, 19^P0.1, 44.3^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	79.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (41.5 - 79.7, n=2, last 2 years)	60.6 fps -24%

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	82.6 (69.1^min, 70.2^P0.1, 71.4^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	82.6 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (n=1last 2 years)	82.6 fps 0%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	98.7 (74.9^min, 78.7^P0.1, 82.3^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	98.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (n=1last 2 years)	98.7 fps 0%

Space Marine 2
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	98.6 (62.2^min, 67.7^P0.1, 80.9^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	98.6 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (48.2 - 98.6, n=2, last 2 years)	73.4 fps -26%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS
Aorus Master 18 AM8H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX	100.8 (66.6^min, 75.5^P0.1, 80.2^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	100.8 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 100.8, n=2, last 2 years)	83 fps -18%

此外，我们的赛博朋克测试表明，它的 CPU 和 GPU 性能都保持了良好的稳定性。除了上面提到的零星黑屏之外，它的主观游戏体验非常出色，由于笔记本电脑的原始性能很高，画面总是感觉超级流畅。

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

Aorus Master 18 AM8H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø137.1 (125.6-141.4)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø144.2 (124.3-147.1)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø110 (100.1-112)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø107.9 (97.6-110.3)

排放量

噪音排放

在测试过程中，当我们使用平衡配置文件运行时，Master 18 在涡轮增压模式下已经达到了 Scar 18 的噪音水平。在负载情况下，50 至 53 分贝（A）的噪音清晰可闻，因此你可能需要戴上耳机。在空闲模式下，情况要轻松愉快得多，因为风扇通常要么关闭，要么运行在相当低的水平（18 英寸的设备有时只会发出令人不悦的呜呜声）。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 29 / 34 dB(A)
Load		50 / 53 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Aorus Master 18 AM8H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Noise		2%	5%	4%	10%	10%
off / environment *	25	23.3 7%	23.8 5%	24.1 4%	23.6 6%	22.8 9%
Idle Minimum *	26	29.8 -15%	23.8 8%	24.1 7%	23.8 8%	23.8 8%
Idle Average *	29	29.8 -3%	27.2 6%	30.6 -6%	26.1 10%	23.8 18%
Idle Maximum *	34	29.8 12%	31.3 8%	30.6 10%	31.5 7%	28 18%
Load Average *	50	42.9 14%	47.6 5%	45.5 9%	31.5 37%	38 24%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	52	53.7 -3%	51.3 1%	48.2 7%
Load Maximum *	53	53.7 -1%	53.3 -1%	53.4 -1%	56.6 -7%	62.8 -18%
Witcher 3 ultra *					52.1	57.3

* ... smaller is better

温度

笔记本电脑的机箱主要在后三分之一处发热。在 3D 模式下，我们可以从其表面测得高达 50 °C（顶部）和 46 °C（底部）的温度。另一方面，值得庆幸的是，我们注意到腕托的温度从未超过 34 °C。在空闲模式下，它的性能略显薄弱，因为在测试过程中，整个机箱很快就突破了 30 °C。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


50 °C	49 °C	47 °C
37 °C	43 °C	41 °C
34 °C	33 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 40.6 °C


46 °C	40 °C	43 °C
33 °C	33 °C	34 °C
26 °C	29 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 34.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 51 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


34 °C	36 °C	34 °C
34 °C	32 °C	36 °C
32 °C	34 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 33.9 °C


34 °C	35 °C	35 °C
35 °C	34 °C	34 °C
33 °C	33 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 33.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


49 °C	48 °C	49 °C
38 °C	42 °C	43 °C
33 °C	32 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 40.6 °C


42 °C	40 °C	45 °C
34 °C	32 °C	35 °C
28 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 34.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 55 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.2 °C / -9.4 F).

	Aorus Master 18 AM8H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat		12%	18%	5%	-0%	11%
Maximum Upper Side *	50	45.6 9%	44 12%	48.3 3%	41.2 18%	37.8 24%
Maximum Bottom *	46	46 -0%	44.1 4%	53.3 -16%	34.6 25%	37.6 18%
Idle Upper Side *	36	28.9 20%	26.1 27%	28.3 21%	42.8 -19%	34.8 3%
Idle Bottom *	35	29.2 17%	25.5 27%	30.3 13%	43.6 -25%	36 -3%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行压力测试期间，根据我们的测量软件，GeForce RTX 5090 的平均发热温度为 78 °C，而 Core Ultra 9 275HX 的平均发热温度为 96 °C。运行《赛博朋克 2077》时的结果与此类似。

发言人

除了最大音量（77 分贝）一般之外，Master 18 的音响系统提供了良好的音效，可以轻松与 Strix Scar 18 相媲美。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Aorus Master 18 AM8H audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

Master 18 在空转时已经消耗了相当多的能量--Scar 18 发出了它的问候：从纸面上看，29 到 48 瓦的功率并不能保证电池长时间运行。在负载情况下，它的需求会攀升至 340 瓦，华硕笔记本电脑在这种情况下的能耗更高，这是因为其处理器的 PL1/PL2 值更为宽松。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	29 / 33 / 48 Watt
Load	141 / 340 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Aorus Master 18 AM8H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		1%	48%	44%	13%	9%	38%
Idle Minimum *	29	11.4 61%	9.4 68%	10.9 62%	10.6 63%	13.2 54%	13.7 ?(2 - 39, n=120, last 2 years) 53%
Idle Average *	33	39.2 -19%	13.6 59%	13.5 59%	20.9 37%	25.4 23%	19.6 ?(8 - 55.6, n=120, last 2 years) 41%
Idle Maximum *	48	40.2 16%	15.8 67%	13.7 71%	40 17%	53.5 -11%	27.3 ?(9 - 101.1, n=120, last 2 years) 43%
Load Average *	141	161.2 -14%	115.4 18%	120.2 15%	201.1 -43%	151.4 -7%	103.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=118, last 2 years) 26%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	283	303 -7%	164.5 42%	178.2 37%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	283	295 -4%	160.4 43%	177.6 37%
Load Maximum *	340	430.9 -27%	216.7 36%	246.1 28%	378.9 -11%	395.2 -16%	248 ?(64.5 - 431, n=120, last 2 years) 27%
Witcher 3 ultra *					358	336

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Aorus Master 18 AM8H; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø261 (180.6-340)

Aorus Master 18 AM8H; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø33.1 (29.2-48)

Aorus Master 18 AM8H; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø283 (277-292)

Power consumption with external monitor

Aorus Master 18 AM8H; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø156.4 (148.1-193.9)

Aorus Master 18 AM8H; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø183 (178.7-187.5)

Aorus Master 18 AM8H; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø249 (245-256)

Aorus Master 18 AM8H; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø37.8 (34-46.5)

Aorus Master 18 AM8H; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø283 (275-292)

运行时间

技嘉为其 18 英寸笔记本电脑配备了 99 Wh 的可观电池容量，高于 Scar 18 的 90 Wh。在亮度降至 150 cd/m² 的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Master 18 的续航时间约为 5 小时。相比之下，华硕笔记本电脑的续航时间不到 5.5 小时，尽管容量较低，但续航时间略长。顺便提一下，在使用平衡模式时，一旦设备断开电源，dGPU 就会自动停用。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		5h 48min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 52min

	Aorus Master 18 AM8H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	Alienware m18 R2 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-13%	82%	60%	-2%	-17%	25%
Reader / Idle	348					353 1%	585 ?(239 - 1290, n=49, last 2 years) 68%
WiFi v1.3	296	332 12%	540 82%	475 60%	290 -2%	252 -15%	385 ?(85 - 889, n=120, last 2 years) 30%
Load	112	70 -37%				72 -36%	84.9 ?(41 - 164, n=80, last 2 years) -24%
H.264		347		592			457 ?(129 - 884, n=54, last 2 years)
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd		44		71

Notebookcheck 总评分

Aorus Master 18 是一款极其昂贵但功能强大的 18 英寸台式机替代产品。

Back to the verdict

Aorus Master 18 AM8H - 04/29/2025 v8
Florian Glaser

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

72 / 80 → 91%

Weight

54 / 10-68 → 75%

Battery

63 / 95 → 66%

Display

90%

Games Performance

95%

Application Performance

93%

AI Performance

89%

Temperature

84 / 95 → 88%

Noise

65 / 90 → 72%

Audio

78%

Camera

35 / 75 → 47%

Average

63%

87%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
83%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 34.2%

Video test of the RTX 5080 version

▶ load Youtube video

Possible alternatives compared

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Height	Display
1. 86.8%	Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $54.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... 2. $54.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... List Price: 5000 EUR	3.4 kg	31 mm	18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED
2. 88%	Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $7,199.99 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025... 2. $3,399.99 ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025... 3. $2,899.00 ASUS ROG Strix Scar 16 (2024... List Price: 5799€	3.3 kg	32 mm	18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED
3. 90%	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $20.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 2. $99.99 240W Laptop Charger for Asus... 3. $1,479.99 ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 Gaming... List Price: 4799€	1.9 kg	17.4 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED
4. 87%	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $5,495.00 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... 2. $5,698.00 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... 3. $5,698.00 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... List Price: 4399€	2.1 kg	17.4 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED
5. 89.5% ^{v7 (old)}	Alienware m18 R2 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $2,799.99 Alienware M18 R2 Gaming Lapt... 2. $4,799.99 Alienware Dell M18 R2 Gaming... 3. $4,099.99 Dell Alienware M18 R2 Gaming... List Price: 3300 USD	4 kg	26.7 mm	18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS
6. 88.8% ^{v7 (old)}	MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 4096 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $5,899.00 EXCaliberPC [2024] MSI Titan... 2. $516.99 A-Tech 192GB Kit (4x48GB) RA... 3. $189.00 400W ADP-400CB B Laptop Char... List Price: 5000 USD	3.6 kg	32.1 mm	18.00" 3840x2400 252 PPI Mini-LED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 426 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 529473 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Aorus Master 18 游戏笔记本电脑评测：RTX 5090 带来的代价

Florian Glaser, 2025-05- 2 (Update: 2025-05- 2)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4970
Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4989
Minisforum G7 PT R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7600M XT	4998
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	5044
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	5121
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5205
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5205
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
i9-14900K, Radeon RX 7800 XT	50047
R9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070	50253
Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50411
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	50464
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 R7 7700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	50542
R9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti	51094
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Super Founders Edition i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	51107
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论：RTX 5090 可在大师 18 中大显身手

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

案例

尺寸比较

连接性

端口

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

配件

维护

可持续性

保修

输入设备

键盘

触摸板

显示屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

排放量

噪音排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

Aorus Master 18 AM8H audio analysis

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX audio analysis

能源管理

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Notebookcheck 总评分

Video test of the RTX 5080 version

Possible alternatives compared

Transparency