得益于 300 Hz mini LED，最快的游戏笔记本电脑现在更出色了 - XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑评测

Name: SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Brand: SCHENKER

采用外部水冷，亮度为 1,700 尼特。

Neo 16 是 XMG 传统上速度最快的游戏笔记本电脑，2025 型号除了配备 AMD/Intel 的 HX CPU 和新的 Blackwell GPU 外，还配备了 300 Hz mini LED 雾面显示屏。然而，它的高性能却被一些连接方面的瑕疵所抵消。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 05/16/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Arrow Lake Blackwell RTX 5000 Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Windows

结论 - XMG Neo 16 性能良好，但在连接性方面存在缺陷

传统上，Neo 16 是市场上速度最快的游戏笔记本电脑之一，目前的 E25 型号也不例外。其酷睿至尊 9 275HX和 GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑都能提供保持稳定的巨大性能。此外，它还配备了快速的 PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘，可以在原生分辨率下流畅运行所有现代游戏。我们已经开始期待 AMD 版本的 Ryzen 9 9955HX3D因为 XMG 是为数不多的同时为高端玩家提供 AMD 芯片的制造商之一，因此其游戏性能应该会更好一些。

它的哑光微型 LED 面板是一次重大升级，可提供出色的画质。其高亮度尤其适合 HDR 内容；得益于其 300 Hz 的频率，动作看起来非常流畅。其亮度在 SDR 模式下超过 800 尼特，在 HDR 模式下超过 1,500 尼特，优于任何 OLED 面板。它可以关闭局部调光功能，并完全支持 P3 色彩空间，但该设备的 P3 色彩配置文件并不是最准确的。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

此外，面板的局部调光功能还对设备的功耗产生了积极影响，尤其是在显示较暗内容时，功耗更低。对于如此强大的笔记本电脑来说，它的运行时间同样令人印象深刻。它拥有足够的端口、出色的扬声器、漂亮的输入设备和方便的维护选项，所有这些都装在一个超级稳定的金属外壳中。

话虽如此，尽管价格不菲，但你还是得忍受没有 Thunderbolt 5 或 Wi-Fi 7 等多种连接选项。不过，对于 2025 年的高端笔记本电脑来说，没有高级擎天柱和内部显示屏的 G-Sync 功能是一个很大的减分项。目前，XMG 正在与 Nvidia 合作寻找解决方案，并已将广泛的信息传递给客户。不过，目前还不能保证该功能一定会实现。

该设备的可选外部水冷系统运行良好，主要有助于降低风扇体积以及机箱和组件的温度。CPU 的性能略有提升，尤其是在综合负载情况下，一些游戏也会从中受益。即便如此，它的纯 GPU 性能并没有改变，因为即使没有 Oasis，Neo 16 也能达到 175 瓦的最大功率。

Pros

+ 极高性能（CPU 和 GPU）

+ PCIe 5.0 和大量端口

+ 超亮迷你 LED 面板

+ 极佳的画质和 300 Hz 频率

+ 稳定且高质量的机箱

+ 舒适的键盘

+ 良好的维护选项和高达 128 GB 的内存

+ 更长的电池寿命

+ 快速读卡器

+ 可选水冷

Cons

- 没有内置显示屏的高级 Optimus 和 G-Sync 功能

- 没有 Wi-Fi 7 或 Thunderbolt 5

- 游戏时风扇噪音大

- 电源线短

- P3 出厂配置文件不太准确

价格和供应情况

新款 XMG Neo 16 E25 的基本版售价约为 3000 美元，但目前在美国尚未接受预订。

结论 - XMG Neo 16 性能良好，但在连接性方面存在缺陷
规格
外壳和连接
输入设备 - 舒适的键盘
显示屏 - 超亮迷你 LED 面板
性能 - Arrow Lake-HX 最高 128GB 内存
排放 - Oasis 可帮助解决体积和温度问题
能源管理 - 电池寿命长
Notebookcheck 总评分
可能的替代品比较

我们获得了新款 XMG Neo 16 的第一印象的第一印象。事实证明，它的性能非常出色，但我们还无法对其新型微型 LED 面板进行精确测量。现在，我们在编辑部拥有了新款 Neo 16 E25 的零售机，并对其进行了广泛测试--RTX 5090 笔记本电脑、酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 和新款迷你 LED 面板。我们还测试了新版的外置 Oasis 水冷系统。我们的测试设备与上述组件的价格约为 5,000 美元。

规格

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop (XMG Neo 16 Series)

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 200 W PL2 / Short Burst, 185 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 2535 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 576.40, Optimus, MUX Switch

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-6400, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 128 GB RAM

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, NE160QDM-NM9, Mini-LED, glossy: yes, HDR, 300 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)

Storage

Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB

, 870 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Arrow Lake-S PCH - ACE (Audio Context Engine)

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 27.9 x 356.7 x 259.9

Battery

99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Camera

Webcam: 1080p w/ mechanical shutter + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 420W PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.853 kg, Power Supply: 835 g

Price

4450 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳和连接

今年，Neo 16 的总体设计依然非常相似，但其金属外壳的某些部分有所改变。例如，机身侧面不再有出风口，连接处的分布也略有调整。其制造质量和稳定性仍然很好，但遗憾的是，其表面仍然很容易留下污痕。新的微型 LED 面板使笔记本电脑的重量增加了约 150 克，Neo 16 的重量为 2.85 千克，是我们对比组中最重的设备之一。它的正面还有一个 LED 灯带。

虽然没有最新的 Thunderbolt 5 标准，但其连接性仍然包括 Thunderbolt 4、HDMI 2.1 和足够的 USB 端口。机箱右侧的全功能读卡器速度超快，Wi-Fi 模块的传输速率也很高且稳定--尽管它还不支持 Wi-Fi 7。该设备的 1080p 网络摄像头（包括机械快门和红外模块）可满足其用途，但不支持 Studio Effects。它不是 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，但可以使用实时字幕。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) HP Omen Max 16 ah000 DIN A4 ❌

左：以太网（2.5 GBit/s）、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2（10 GBit/s、DisplayPort 1.4a、100 瓦功率传输）、USB-A 3.2 Gen 1（5 GBit/s）、3.5 毫米音频

右：2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen 1（5 GBit/s）、SD 读卡器、Kensington NanoSaver Lock

背面：连接 Oasis 水冷系统、USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT Mode 2.1、140 瓦 Power Delivery）、电源、Mini DisplayPort 2.1、HDMI 2.1

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	123 MB/s
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	112.95 (84.14^min - 119.3^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 204, n=68, last 2 years)	94.2 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	76 MB/s -38%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	260.6 MB/s
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	205.44 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=67, last 2 years)	120.7 MB/s -54%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	87 MB/s -67%

Networking
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1681 (min: 1637) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1717 (min: 1648) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1641 (min: 1404) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1574 (min: 1553) MBit/s ∼92%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1194 (min: 998) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1312 (min: 1065) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1402 (min: 997) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1564 (min: 1521) MBit/s ∼92%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1270 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1422 (min: 1224) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1242 (min: 1202) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1513 (min: 1456) MBit/s ∼89%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1588 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1677 (min: 1641) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1621 (min: 1491) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1694 (min: 842) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1018 (min: 656) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1689 (min: 843) MBit/s ∼98%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1681 (1637-1732)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1717 (1648-1739)

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: 7.09 ∆E min: 2.82 - max: 12.22 ∆E

配件 - XMG Oasis（Mk2-V4）

一般来说，我们已经知道了前几年的新版 Oasis（Mk2-V4），但对它进行了一些小的改进，包括双区照明和用于当前 Neo 16 的新连接线，因为笔记本电脑本身的连接线现在可以卡入到位。安装非常简单，除了水管外，只有一根电源线，而原来的电源只需插入 Oasis 即可。Oasis 设备和笔记本电脑之间通过蓝牙进行通信，指挥中心提供大量设置选项。Oasis 与 Neo 16 的捆绑售价约为 220 美元（单价约为 240 美元）。

维护

机箱下盖用 10 颗十字螺丝固定，可以轻松取下。该设备的内部结构经过全面修改，主板现在由两部分组成（CPU/GPU 分离），另外，现在使用三个风扇而不是两个。固态硬盘位于螺钉固定的盖板下，而内存插槽盖板是插进去的，非常紧，这在一定程度上增加了维护工作的难度。WLAN 模块也可以更换，电池用螺丝固定。

可持续性

XMG 没有提供任何有关该设备的_二氧化碳排放量或使用回收材料的信息。这款笔记本电脑的包装几乎全部由纸板组成。

保修

其标准保修期为 24 个月（取货和退货），包括前 6 个月的快速维修。根据不同的快速维修条款，保修期可延长至 3 年。

输入设备 - 舒适的键盘

笔记本电脑的输入设备几乎没有变化。用户继续使用非常舒适的键盘（包括数字小键盘），键盘反馈丰富，按键精准，不过现在的按键感觉稍硬。键盘布局清晰，每个按键的背光（4 级强度）均可单独调节。ClickPad（12.3 x 7.8 厘米）光滑平整，没有异响，不过下部的机械咔哒声听起来有点响。

显示屏 - 超亮迷你 LED 面板

除了我们熟悉的 IPS 显示屏外，XMG 现在还可以选配频率为 300 Hz 的微型 LED 面板。其分辨率仍为 2,560 x 1,600 像素，但目前内部显示屏不支持 G-Sync。更多信息请访问XMG 官方网站了解更多信息（外接显示屏支持 G-Sync）。从主观上看，雾面面板的画质非常出色，即使是明亮的表面也不会出现颗粒感，此外，如果需要，你还可以关闭局部调光功能。虽然我们注意到持续闪烁，但其频率超过 20 kHz，频率极高。这种闪烁也让我们难以确定屏幕的准确响应时间，但据制造商称，其响应时间与前代机型相当，因此非常快。

新面板的亮度尤其令人印象深刻，我们的测试设备在测试过程中明显超过了制造商的规格（750/1000 尼特），在 SDR 模式下平均亮度约为 860 cd/m²，在 HDR 模式（全屏）下超过 1700 cd/m²。当局部调光激活时，它的黑阶为 0，从而产生了巨大的对比度。


865 cd/m²	857 cd/m²	839 cd/m²
881 cd/m²	888 cd/m²	853 cd/m²
853 cd/m²	855 cd/m²	837 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

NE160QDM-NM9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 888 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 858.7 cd/m² Minimum: 15.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 888 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
88.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop NE160QDM-NM9, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 300 Hz	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 NE160QDM-NM8, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Samsung ATNA60HU01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Samsung ATNA60DL02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H ATNA60DL03-0 (SDC41AB), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) BOE NE160QDM-NZA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Display		0%	2%	4%	0%	-17%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	99.9 0%	99.5 0%	99.7 0%	95.3 -5%	70.2 -30%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	98.8 -1%	98 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	88.5	88.4 0%	94.4 7%	98.2 11%	94.1 6%	70.6 -20%
Response Times		32%	34%	33%	34%	49%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	17.4 ?(8.4, 9)	7 ?(5, 2) 60%	0.28 ?(0.14, 0.14) 98%	0.29 ?(0.15, 0.14) 98%	0.24 ?(0.12, 0.12) 99%	11.2 ?(5.2, 6) 36%
Response Time Black / White *	13 ?(4.6, 8.4)	8.4 ?(4, 4.4) 35%	0.43 ?(0.22, 0.21) 97%	0.47 ?(0.25, 0.22) 96%	0.43 ?(0.18, 0.25) 97%	5.1 ?(1.6, 3.5) 61%
PWM Frequency	20253	20555 ?(100) 1%	1438 ?(100) -93%	960 ?(100) -95%	960 -95%
Screen		30%	4%	-7%	-11%	-14%
Brightness middle	888	754 -15%	490.4 -45%	376.5 -58%	435 -51%	530 -40%
Brightness	859	773 -10%	498 -42%	382 -56%	437 -49%	497 -42%
Brightness Distribution	94	91 -3%	97 3%	96 2%	96 2%	85 -10%
Black Level *		0.07			0.08	0.53
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.3	1 70%	3.2 3%	3.67 -11%	2.42 27%	3.21 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.5	2 64%	6.04 -10%	7.24 -32%	4.81 13%	5.8 -5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.5		0.84 44%	0.94 37%	2.03 -35%	1.44 4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.8	1 74%	1 74%	1.1 71%	3.11 18%	4.2 -11%
Gamma	2.46 ^89%	2.14 ^103%	2.24 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.48 ^89%	2.226 ^99%
CCT	6267 ^104%	6493 ^100%	6373 ^102%	6319 ^103%	6270 ^104%	6448 ^101%
Contrast		10771			5438	1000
Total Average (Program / Settings)		21% / 23%	13% / 10%	10% / 5%	8% / 2%	6% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

面板完全覆盖了 sRGB 和 P3 色彩空间，但提供的两个 P3 配置文件并不是最好的，灰度和色彩的偏差相对较大。只有通过我们自己的校准（配置文件可在上面免费下载），我们才能充分发挥屏幕的潜力，但只有 100% 的蓝色仍未达到 3 的目标值。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.6 ms rise
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
17.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

20253 Hz
Amplitude: 75 %

The display backlight flickers at 20253 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 20253 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能 - Arrow Lake-HX 最高 128GB 内存

Neo 16 可配备英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX或两款 AMD 芯片 Ryzen 9 9955HX/9955HX3D并可与最高 128 GB 内存（AMD：96 GB）组合使用。RTX 5070 Ti/5080/5090 笔记本电脑显卡可用作 GPU。

测试条件

XMG 在笔记本电脑的控制中心提供各种能耗配置文件和超级广泛的手动模式。由于 "高级优化 "模式尚不支持，我们在基准测试和测量中使用了超频模式和专用 GPU 模式（更多信息请参见 XMG 官方网站）。

能源概况	CPU TDP	CB 2024 Multi	GPU TGP	Time Spy 图形	CP 2077 QHD Ultra	最大风扇噪音排放
平衡型	45 瓦	1,450 点	150 瓦	22,518 点	97fps	45.3 dB(A)
发烧级	85 瓦	1,909 分	150 瓦	22,656 分	102.4fps	48.6 dB(A)
Overboost	200/185 瓦	2,254 分	175 瓦	25,040 分	108.3fps	55.4 dB(A)
Overboost + Oasis	210 瓦	2,288 分	175 瓦	24,408 分	111.4fps	50.5 dB(A)
电池（发烧友）	42 瓦	1,347 分	60 瓦	11,505 分	17.4fps	33.4 dB(A)

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HX

酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX Core Ultra 9 275HXNeo 16 中的 Core Ultra 9 275HX 因其高功耗限制而被证明比竞争对手稍快，而且在我们的测试过程中其性能保持非常稳定。不过，对比设备之间的差异并不大，在游戏时也不会很明显。此外，与酷睿 i9-14900HX的平均优势仅为 4%。使用 Oasis 水冷系统后，它的性能略有提高，也更加稳定。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, : Ø6151 (6038.65-6270.58)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, : Ø5832 (5537.87-5930.32)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, : Ø5698 (5601.46-5746.3)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, : Ø5145 (5108.56-5171.97)

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16: Ø5596 (5505.09-5679.4)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, : Ø5001 (4861.45-5267.14)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis: Ø6238 (6207.32-6270.58)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	86.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	86.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	82.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	81.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	81.1 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	81 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	78.2 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	74.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	59.7 pt

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	2288 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2254 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2196 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1597 - 2288, n=9)	2088 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2060 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	1940 Points -14%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	1913 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (331 - 2298, n=68, last 2 years)	1371 Points -39%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	138.2 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	137.9 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (130.5 - 138.2, n=9)	135.2 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	134 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	131.7 Points -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	130.7 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	130.5 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138.2, n=69, last 2 years)	118.5 Points -14%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	40970 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	40951 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	38039 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	36597 (34151.5^min - 36596.9^max) Points -11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (31513 - 40970, n=11)	36524 Points -11%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	36329 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	36249 Points -11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	33449 (32761.6^min - 33449.1^max) Points -18%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=146, last 2 years)	22794 Points -44%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	2267 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2260 Points
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	2216 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	2209 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2126 - 2267, n=11)	2207 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2195 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2141 Points -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2128 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=146, last 2 years)	1916 Points -15%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	16108 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	15881 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	14828 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12302 - 16108, n=11)	14346 Points -10%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	14307 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	14183 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	13824 Points -13%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	13178 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=146, last 2 years)	8768 Points -45%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	870 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	869 Points
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	854 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (811 - 870, n=11)	850 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	844 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	843 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	831 Points -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	811 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=146, last 2 years)	737 Points -15%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	6271 (6038.65^min - 6270.58^max) Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	6271 (6207.32^min - 6270.58^max) Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	5930 (5537.87^min - 5930.32^max) Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	5746 (5601.46^min - 5746.3^max) Points -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4853 - 6271, n=11)	5691 Points -9%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	5679 (5505.09^min - 5679.4^max) Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	5267 Points -16%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	5172 (5108.56^min - 5171.97^max) Points -18%
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=149, last 2 years)	3515 Points -44%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	343 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	341 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	340 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	336 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (317 - 343, n=11)	336 Points -1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	331 Points -3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	317 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	310 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=146, last 2 years)	283 Points -17%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=140, last 2 years)	166.7 Seconds * -101%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	102 Seconds * -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	95 Seconds * -14%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	93 Seconds * -12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82 - 116, n=11)	92.6 Seconds * -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	90 Seconds * -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	87 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	83 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	82 Seconds * +1%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	135229 MIPS +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	124155 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	123497 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	121092 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	117940 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (99248 - 124155, n=11)	115611 MIPS -7%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	112410 MIPS -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	104686 MIPS -16%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 144064, n=144, last 2 years)	85910 MIPS -31%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	7406 MIPS +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	7114 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	6970 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6186 - 7114, n=11)	6836 MIPS -4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	6669 MIPS -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	6654 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	6607 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=144, last 2 years)	6311 MIPS -11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	6186 MIPS -13%

Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	21156 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	20902 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	20890 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=12)	19517 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	19451 Points -7%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	19299 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	19081 Points -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	18322 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=130, last 2 years)	14857 Points -29%

Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	3160 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	3129 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	3109 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	3072 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2917 - 3160, n=12)	3070 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	3052 Points -2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	3046 Points -2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2917 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=130, last 2 years)	2711 Points -13%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	25599 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	25580 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	24285 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (19105 - 25855, n=11)	23292 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	23086 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	22414 Points -12%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	22218 Points -13%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	21195 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=143, last 2 years)	15449 Points -40%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	2286 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2264 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2235 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2034 - 2292, n=11)	2218 Points -2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	2214 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2199 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	2195 Points -3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	2034 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=143, last 2 years)	1932 Points -15%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	43.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	43.2 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	40.4 fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	38.9 fps -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (32.6 - 43.8, n=11)	38.8 fps -10%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	36 fps -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	35.3 fps -18%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	35 fps -19%
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=144, last 2 years)	24.7 fps -43%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=142, last 2 years)	47.5 s * -17%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (36.9 - 62.1, n=11)	43.6 s * -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	41.4 s * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	40.7 s *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	40.5 s * -0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	40.46 s * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	39.4 s * +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	36.9 s * +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	32.9 s * +19%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	0.4568 sec * -13%
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=145, last 2 years)	0.4359 sec * -8%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Aorus Master 16	0.43 sec * -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	0.4141 sec * -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	0.4132 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=11)	0.4124 sec * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX,	0.4053 sec *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	0.4045 sec * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX,	0.3658 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

6271 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

292 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

340 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

15881 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

869 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2260 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

40951 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

138.2 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

2254 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	96.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	95.2 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	90.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	90.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	89 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	87 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84 pt
Average of class Gaming	65.4 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	39895 KRay/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	39551 KRay/s -1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	38066 KRay/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (29330 - 39895, n=10)	36268 KRay/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	35760 KRay/s -10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	34180 KRay/s -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	30829 KRay/s -23%
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=143, last 2 years)	24367 KRay/s -39%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	198802 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	191476 Points -4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	189130 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	183428 Points -8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (140254 - 198802, n=10)	180575 Points -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	173656 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	150728 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=143, last 2 years)	114789 Points -42%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9734 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9480 MB/s -3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9025 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	8828 MB/s -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6998 - 9734, n=10)	8765 MB/s -10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	8315 MB/s -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7588 MB/s -22%
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=143, last 2 years)	5236 MB/s -46%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148966 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	140695 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	138882 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	137820 Points -2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	135378 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (113887 - 140695, n=10)	132930 Points -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	128670 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=143, last 2 years)	116266 Points -17%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18114 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	14382 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	13969 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	13955 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 32988, n=143, last 2 years)	13581 Points -6%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	13522 Points -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (11172 - 14382, n=10)	13466 Points -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	12272 Points -15%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	102630 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	102544 Points
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	98724 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	95742 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72596 - 104057, n=10)	94867 Points -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	90980 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76668 Points -25%
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=143, last 2 years)	58638 Points -43%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	145389 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	136847 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	134042 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	134008 MB/s -2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	129745 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (107858 - 136847, n=10)	127858 MB/s -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	118108 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=143, last 2 years)	108305 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2263 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2239 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2179 MB/s -4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2076 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	2067 MB/s -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1757 - 2263, n=10)	2057 MB/s -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1896 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=143, last 2 years)	1411 MB/s -38%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	21185 KRay/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	20910 KRay/s
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	20602 KRay/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	19630 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14847 - 21372, n=10)	19433 KRay/s -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	18490 KRay/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16655 KRay/s -20%
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=143, last 2 years)	13074 KRay/s -37%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	56613 MPixel/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	53630 MPixel/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	53522 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (47726 - 56613, n=10)	51635 MPixel/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49305 MPixel/s -8%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	49039 MPixel/s -9%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	48187 MPixel/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62274, n=143, last 2 years)	41022 MPixel/s -24%

系统性能

Neo 16 在系统基准测试和日常使用中都给人留下了非常好的印象，尽管对比设备之间还是没有明显的差异。

Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	88.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	88 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	85.6 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	85.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	85.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	84.9 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 ^-1! GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	81.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	75.1 pt

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	9153 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9032 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9017 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	8819 Points -2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	8794 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (8241 - 9032, n=6)	8686 Points -4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	8241 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=130, last 2 years)	7940 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	11215 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	11162 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	11103 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11065 Points -1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	10969 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9994 - 11162, n=6)	10879 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years)	10761 Points -4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	9994 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	11681 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=130, last 2 years)	9873 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	9590 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9317 Points
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	9300 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9122 - 9444, n=6)	9275 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	9164 Points -2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	9122 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	19351 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	19227 Points
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	18445 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	18293 Points -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (16344 - 19227, n=6)	17650 Points -8%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	16344 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	15394 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=130, last 2 years)	12959 Points -33%

CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2344 Points +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2253 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2249 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1995 - 2282, n=6)	2191 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2144 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	2017 Points -10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1995 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=109, last 2 years)	1923 Points -14%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2162 Points +5%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2106 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2062 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1847 - 2119, n=6)	2018 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1948 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1922 Points -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1847 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=109, last 2 years)	1820 Points -12%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2660 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2612 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2556 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2285 - 2612, n=6)	2501 Points -4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2452 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	2288 Points -12%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	2285 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=109, last 2 years)	2119 Points -19%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2139 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2045 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1673 - 2181, n=6)	1893 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1864 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=109, last 2 years)	1710 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1686 Points -10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1673 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1597 Points -14%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	359 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	359 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	349 Points
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	346 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	344 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (315 - 359, n=6)	343 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	336 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=123, last 2 years)	306 Points -12%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	337 Points +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	333 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	333 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	333 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (317 - 337, n=5)	331 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	306 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=110, last 2 years)	271 Points -19%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming (404 - 674, n=134, last 2 years)	494 ms * -22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	428 ms * -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	420 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (404 - 420, n=6)	413 ms * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	412 ms * -2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	411 ms * -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	408 ms * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	404 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		9032 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	86978 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	85644 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84020 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74558 - 86978, n=10)	81923 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78897 MB/s -9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	77500 MB/s -11%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	75982 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=143, last 2 years)	67765 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	97151 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	95542 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	87760 MB/s -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74094 - 97151, n=10)	87450 MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86939 MB/s -11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84473 MB/s -13%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82625 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 102937, n=143, last 2 years)	70806 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	85648 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	84581 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82159 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72929 - 85648, n=10)	79370 MB/s -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	77637 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77562 MB/s -9%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	73095 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=143, last 2 years)	69909 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	118.7 ns * -10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 125.1, n=10)	112.1 ns * -4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	111.9 ns * -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	111.2 ns * -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	109.3 ns * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	107.7 ns *
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=143, last 2 years)	98.2 ns * +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76.1 ns * +29%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，我们的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时，其当前 BIOS 版本显示出轻微的限制。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2478.6 μs * -69%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	2296.5 μs * -57%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1637.7 μs * -12%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1516.1 μs * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1465.8 μs *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	464.2 μs * +68%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

两个 M.2 2280 插槽中的一个已经支持 PCIe 5.0 连接，我们的测试设备配备了相应的三星 9100 Pro 固态硬盘。其存储容量为 1 TB，用户首次启动设备后可使用 870 GB。在我们的测试中，其传输速率超过了 10 GB/s，即使在长期负载的情况下也能保持稳定。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 10986 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6242 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 545 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 488 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 84.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 151.4 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 465 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1077 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	81.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	77.2 pt
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	76.4 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	64.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	63.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	61.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	56.1 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	49.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5861 (5825.98^min - 5861.12^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (5359 - 5861, n=2)	5610 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	3998 (3658.3^min - 3998.4^max) MB/s -32%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	3415 (3349.37^min - 3415.42^max) MB/s -42%
Average of class Gaming (281 - 7045, n=126, last 2 years)	3410 MB/s -42%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3268 (3226.52^min - 3267.96^max) MB/s -44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3015 (2943.98^min - 3014.55^max) MB/s -49%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	331 (68.02^min - 331.14^max) MB/s -94%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4826 (4760.33^min - 4825.54^max) MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	4387 (4285.53^min - 4387.28^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (4147 - 4387, n=2)	4267 MB/s -3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3906 (3851.27^min - 3906.37^max) MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=126, last 2 years)	3806 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	3016 (2843.5^min - 3016.38^max) MB/s -31%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	2570 (2187.36^min - 2569.74^max) MB/s -41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1922 (1819.62^min - 1921.76^max) MB/s -56%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	13091 (10532.2^min - 13090.8^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (12505 - 13091, n=2)	12798 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7140 (5903.9^min - 7139.54^max) MB/s -45%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	7069 (5962.41^min - 7069.08^max) MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	6880 (6106.07^min - 6880.21^max) MB/s -47%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	6766 (5345.22^min - 6765.62^max) MB/s -48%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 15056, n=126, last 2 years)	6407 MB/s -51%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4799 (4213.14^min - 4799.33^max) MB/s -63%
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (7264 - 7451, n=2)	7358 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	7264 (5656.44^min - 7264.06^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6860 (6824.33^min - 6859.91^max) MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	6169 (6112.09^min - 6168.56^max) MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	5275 (5153.09^min - 5274.69^max) MB/s -27%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	5187 (5110.55^min - 5187.31^max) MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 11581, n=126, last 2 years)	4966 MB/s -32%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3905 (3856.71^min - 3905.27^max) MB/s -46%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (77.4 - 77.6, n=2)	77.5 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	77.4 (77.02^min - 77.43^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	69.6 (64.94^min - 69.55^max) MB/s -10%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	68.4 (66.54^min - 68.38^max) MB/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	68.3 (67.41^min - 68.26^max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (32.9 - 95.9, n=126, last 2 years)	67 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	60.5 (49.54^min - 60.46^max) MB/s -22%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	57.4 (57.08^min - 57.42^max) MB/s -26%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	317 (306.21^min - 316.5^max) MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=126, last 2 years)	219 MB/s +39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	174.4 (160.08^min - 174.38^max) MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	159.4 (153.59^min - 159.38^max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	157 (155.82^min - 156.95^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (156.5 - 157, n=2)	156.8 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	153.8 (106.82^min - 153.79^max) MB/s -2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	149.4 (92.02^min - 149.43^max) MB/s -5%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4920 (4883.21^min - 4920.02^max) MB/s +412%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	4760 (4699.8^min - 4760.03^max) MB/s +395%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2809 (2804.8^min - 2809.03^max) MB/s +192%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=126, last 2 years)	2517 MB/s +162%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	982 (747.27^min - 982.13^max) MB/s +2%
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (961 - 979, n=2)	970 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	961 (945.93^min - 961.25^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	679 (591.01^min - 678.88^max) MB/s -29%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4522 (4451.05^min - 4521.93^max) MB/s +731%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	4433 (4354.58^min - 4433.43^max) MB/s +715%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3711 (3674.85^min - 3711.4^max) MB/s +582%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 5588, n=126, last 2 years)	2065 MB/s +280%
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (544 - 563, n=2)	554 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	544 (523.14^min - 543.91^max) MB/s
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	520 (486.41^min - 520.16^max) MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	505 (461.27^min - 504.83^max) MB/s -7%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9365 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	8857 Points
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (8609 - 8857, n=2)	8733 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	7590 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=119, last 2 years)	6771 Points -24%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	6720 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	6515 Points -26%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	5355 Points -40%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3496 Points +70%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	3234 Points +57%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2761 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=119, last 2 years)	2400 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	2056 Points
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (1964 - 2056, n=2)	2010 Points -2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	1569 Points -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1541 Points -25%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5936 Points
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (5809 - 5936, n=2)	5873 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	5263 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4062 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=119, last 2 years)	3210 Points -46%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	3074 Points -48%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2588 Points -56%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1837 Points -69%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9653 MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (9199 - 9653, n=2)	9426 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	5688.57 MB/s -41%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5684.15 MB/s -41%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	5105.48 MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 9653, n=119, last 2 years)	4969 MB/s -49%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	4260 MB/s -56%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4092 MB/s -58%
Seq Write
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (5562 - 5793, n=2)	5678 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5612.29 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5562 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	3812 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 9486, n=119, last 2 years)	3787 MB/s -32%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	3100.36 MB/s -44%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3060 MB/s -45%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1587.46 MB/s -71%
4K Read
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	85 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	81.6 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	75.6 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (49.2 - 81.6, n=2)	65.4 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=119, last 2 years)	65.4 MB/s -20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	63.16 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	59.28 MB/s -27%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	54.74 MB/s -33%
4K Write
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	271 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	250.73 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	249 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	248.48 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	226 MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (226 - 226, n=2)	226 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (79.4 - 512, n=119, last 2 years)	216 MB/s -4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	185.44 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2933.61 MB/s +190%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	2602.02 MB/s +158%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2266 MB/s +124%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3630, n=119, last 2 years)	1830 MB/s +81%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	1039 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1010 MB/s
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	1004.03 MB/s -1%
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (995 - 1010, n=2)	1003 MB/s -1%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5155 MB/s
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (5004 - 5155, n=2)	5080 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	4633 MB/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3252.43 MB/s -37%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=119, last 2 years)	2619 MB/s -49%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	2578.56 MB/s -50%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2011 MB/s -61%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1427.9 MB/s -72%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	0.116 ms * -123%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.092 ms * -77%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=118, last 2 years)	0.05753 ms * -11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	0.054 ms * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.052 ms *
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (0.018 - 0.052, n=2)	0.035 ms * +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	0.033 ms * +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.024 ms * +54%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	0.073 ms * -329%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	0.06 ms * -253%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=119, last 2 years)	0.04966 ms * -192%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.04 ms * -135%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.017 ms *
Average Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB (0.016 - 0.017, n=2)	0.0165 ms * +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.016 ms * +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 WD PC SN8000S 2TB	0.016 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12826 (9538.48-13255.8)

GPU

我们的 Neo 16 测试设备配备了 GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑，这是最快的版本，TGP 为 175 瓦（150 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost）。不过，在撰写本文时，它还不支持高级 Optimus 图形切换，这与它的显示屏有关。XMG 在自己的网站上提供了大量相关信息，虽然目前正在进行验证，但目前还不能保证以后会支持高级 Optimus。为了最大限度地发挥 GPU 性能，可以通过 MUX 开关停用 iGPU，但这需要重新启动。

在合成测试中，Neo 16 的表现非常出色，在所有测试中都名列前茅。与配备了 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑的优势约为 12%，即使在持续负载下（Time Spy 压力测试：97.8%），其性能也保持稳定。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	100 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 ^-1! Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	96.8 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	94.1 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H ^-1! Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	93.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	93 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 ^-1! Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	92.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	89.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	58.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	73596 Points
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	72215 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	71866 Points -2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	70815 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	69606 Points -5%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54052 - 73596, n=9)	68233 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	63549 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (10741 - 73596, n=137, last 2 years)	45116 Points -39%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	54791 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	51946 Points -5%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42516 - 60880, n=10)	50323 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	49297 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	49153 Points -10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	49115 Points -10%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	47034 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (2913 - 56116, n=150, last 2 years)	32501 Points -41%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	25040 Points
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	24873 Points -1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	24563 Points -2%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (19216 - 25129, n=10)	23623 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	23600 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	23003 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	22134 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (2295 - 25040, n=146, last 2 years)	13734 Points -45%
Steel Nomad Score
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6151 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6008 Points -2%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (4791 - 6163, n=8)	5829 Points -5%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5828 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	5102 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming (1522 - 6163, n=39, last 2 years)	3632 Points -41%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	16250 Points
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	16245 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	15721 Points -3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (12749 - 17063, n=8)	15704 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14620 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	14107 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (984 - 16250, n=80, last 2 years)	9517 Points -41%

3DMark 11 Performance		52067 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		42543 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		23199 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		6151 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		25981 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score		25214 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (9.9 - 95, n=137, last 2 years)	20.4 Seconds * -78%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	15.3 Seconds * -33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13 Seconds * -13%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9.9 - 15.3, n=10)	12.1 Seconds * -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	12 Seconds * -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	12 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	11.47 Seconds *
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	11 Seconds * +4%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=138, last 2 years)	34.5 Seconds * -115%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	19.4 Seconds * -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	18 Seconds * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	17 Seconds * -6%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 19.4, n=8)	16.9 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	16.04 Seconds *
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	16 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	15 Seconds * +6%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=143, last 2 years)	285 Seconds * -113%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	167 Seconds * -25%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	162 Seconds * -21%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (125 - 259, n=10)	160.8 Seconds * -20%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	149 Seconds * -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	148 Seconds * -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	138 Seconds * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	134 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在我们的测试中，它的游戏性能同样令人印象深刻，尽管 Neo 并不总是处于领先地位。与所有其他 RTX 5000 笔记本电脑新机型一样，其驱动程序也发挥了作用，不同版本之间可能存在明显差异。另外，自 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑推出以来，已经进行了多次更新，其中一些更新导致了稳定性问题和不同的性能值。至少在稳定性方面，我们在使用当前的 576.28 和 576.40 两个版本时不再遇到任何问题。

在我们的标准 1080p 测试过程中，新款 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑还不能真正展现出它的性能，但在 QHD 中，它比旧款 Neo 16 与 4090 笔记本电脑的领先优势往往要高出 10-20%。当然，新款 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑还支持当前的 DLSS4 和多帧生成技术，不过这些技术只有在极端情况下才会需要，例如在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时选择了 Raytracing Overdrive。在下表中，我们测试了它在运行《赛博朋克》和《艾伦-威克 2》时的升频性能。即使其结果非常高，特别是使用帧生成技术，用户的主观印象仍可能因游戏而异。

Gaming Performance 2560 x 1.600
设置	Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty RT Overdrive	Alan Wake 2 自定义（所有高/超高速 + PT）
原生	24fps	36.1fps
DLSS 质量	48.5fps	59fps
DLSS 性能	72.1fps	78.8fps
DLSS 质量 MFG x2	88.6fps	105.1fps
DLSS 质量 MFG x4	153.6fps	182.3fps

在连接水冷散热器的情况下，其游戏性能通常是相同的，因为即使没有 Oasis，它也能使用 175 瓦的全部功率（尽管 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑无法在每款游戏中都使用 175 瓦的功率）。由于 CPU 的余量更大一些，这方面可能会略有改善。

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	111.4 (94.1^min) fps +3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	111.3 (93.2^min, 89.7^P1) fps +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Aorus Master 16	109.7 (90.9^min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	108.3 (91.2^min) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	107.7 (90.1^min) fps -1%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 111.4, n=12)	105.9 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop,	99.8 (85.5^min, 81.6^P1) fps -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU,	93.8 (53.7^min) fps -13%
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 111.4, n=84, last 2 years)	70.3 fps -35%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop,	155.8 fps +7%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Aorus Master 16	151 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	149.5 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	146 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (103.1 - 158.4, n=10)	142.4 fps -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	141.7 fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU,	133.2 fps -9%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 175.5, n=56, last 2 years)	101 fps -31%

F1 24 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	104.3 (74^min, 81^P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	104 (77^min, 80^P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	103.3 (73^min, 80^P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	97.8 (70^min, 75^P1) fps -5%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (72.5 - 105.5, n=11)	97.1 fps -6%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Aorus Master 16	90 fps -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU,	84.7 (69^min, 68^P1) fps -18%
Average of class Gaming (36.7 - 104.3, n=28, last 2 years)	75.1 fps -27%

Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	57 fps +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Aorus Master 16	56 fps +2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	55 (45^min) fps 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop,	55 (41^min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	55 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (37 - 59, n=9)	52.7 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming (30 - 57, n=18, last 2 years)	48.2 fps -12%

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	115.9 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	102.6 fps +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop,	102.4 fps +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Aorus Master 16	102 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	101.3 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (66.1 - 115.9, n=11)	100.9 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	99.1 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming (66.1 - 115.9, n=16, last 2 years)	96.3 fps -5%

Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	116 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (92 - 123, n=4)	112 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (60 - 119, n=10, last 2 years)	92.2 fps -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	92 fps -21%

Alan Wake 2 - 2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	88.5 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Oasis	88.4 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU,	87.1 (51.7^min, 55.3^P0.1, 66.2^P1) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop,	83.8 fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	83.4 fps -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop,	82.9 fps -6%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (57.6 - 88.5, n=10)	81.4 fps -8%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Aorus Master 16	81.1 fps -8%
Average of class Gaming (22.5 - 88.5, n=29, last 2 years)	69.7 fps -21%

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	97.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	95.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	90.6 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 ^-2! Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88.5 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	65 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	156.2 (125.7^min, 114.4^P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	154.8 (123.7^min) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	153.6 (124.2^min) fps -1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	151.9 (117.7^min, 106.2^P1) fps -2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	137.5 (102^min) fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	131.5 (62.2^min) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 158, n=102, last 2 years)	95.3 fps -38%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	211.5 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	201 fps
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	194 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	193.3 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	187 fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=68, last 2 years)	126 fps -37%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	164.1 (3.7^min, 100^P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	162.8 (3.33^min, 111.1^P1) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	159.3 (3.25^min, 125^P1) fps -3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	140.9 (3.56^min, 90.9^P1) fps -14%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 168.2, n=123, last 2 years)	116.1 fps -29%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	210 fps +3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	203 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	203 fps
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	201 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	196.9 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	194.6 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 210, n=139, last 2 years)	123.6 fps -39%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	434 (21.5^min, 322^P1) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	434 (79.1^min, 306^P1) fps
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	408 (11.4^min, 274^P1) fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	403 (101.2^min, 295^P1) fps -7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	382 (118.7^min, 248^P1) fps -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	375 (147.7^min, 218^P1) fps -14%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 434, n=135, last 2 years)	238 fps -45%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	194.6 (165.7^min) fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	188.9 (155.7^min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	185.6 (154.7^min) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	167.2 (136.1^min) fps -10%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	166.4 (141.2^min) fps -10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	161 (134.6^min) fps -13%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=142, last 2 years)	150.7 fps -19%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144.5 fps +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	124.5 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	119.5 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	115.9 fps -3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	113.2 fps -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	112.6 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 166.2, n=145, last 2 years)	104.6 fps -12%

赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超清版（红色：Neo 16，绿色：带 Oasis 的 Neo 16）

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø148.8 (139-150.3)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD DLSS	QHD	4K DLSS	4K
GTA V (2015)				164.1		163.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	234	207	197.3	185.6				178.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	234	233	203			170.7		102.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	149.2	155.6	119.5					100
Strange Brigade (2018)	601	478	457	434		336		168
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	260.8	229.6	203.7	201		146	124.9	81.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	194.9	191	170.2	154.8	119	108.3		53.5
Alan Wake 2 (2023)	135.7	137.7	129.7			88.5		46.8
F1 24 (2024)	361	342	341	154.9		103.3		50.5
Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024)	215	200	157	151		116		71
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024)	192.6		142.6	128.6		101.3		63.5
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)	112	104	90	70	65	55	53	41

排放 - Oasis 可帮助解决体积和温度问题

噪音排放

Neo 16 在空转和低负载时是一个超级安静的伙伴，因为它发出的 26 dB（A）几乎听不见。然而，在玩游戏或高负荷运转时，它的声音就会变得很大，根据不同的模式，我们测得的分贝在 45-55 dB(A)之间，声音太大了，尤其是在玩安静的游戏时。在这种情况下，您一定要使用耳机。在连接了 Oasis 水冷系统后，Neo 16 的噪音会小一些（43.8-50.5 dB(A)），不过偶尔也能听到水泵的声音。我们的测试设备上没有其他电子噪音。

Lüfterlautstärke Cyberpunk 2077
	平衡	发烧友	超增压
风冷	45.3 dB(A)	48.6 dB(A)	55.4 dB(A)
Oasis 水冷却	43.8 dB(A)	46 dB(A)	50.5 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 26 / 26 dB(A)
Load		52.4 / 55.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Noise		-1%	11%	-4%	7%	-8%
off / environment *	24	23.8 1%	22.9 5%	22.8 5%	23 4%	26 -8%
Idle Minimum *	26	29 -12%	22.9 12%	29 -12%	23 12%	28 -8%
Idle Average *	26	29 -12%	22.9 12%	29 -12%	23 12%	29 -12%
Idle Maximum *	26	29 -12%	26.3 -1%	29 -12%	23 12%	31 -19%
Load Average *	52.4	40.5 23%	27.8 47%	47.7 9%	40.46 23%	51 3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	55.4	53.6 3%	54.2 2%	54.8 1%	59.75 -8%
Load Maximum *	55.4	53.6 3%	53.9 3%	61.1 -10%	59.75 -8%	56 -1%
Witcher 3 ultra *						54

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常使用中，笔记本的金属外壳非常凉爽，但在游戏和压力测试时，其表面会明显发热。这在键盘中间区域尤为明显。不过，其温度从未达到临界值（测量值均未超过 48 °C）。使用 Oasis 水冷系统后，其表面温度降低了 4-5 °C。

Neo 16 在压力测试中表现出色，性能保持稳定。连接 Oasis 后，处理器可以消耗更多电能，GPU 的温度明显降低。

CPU/GPU 数据压力测试（红色：Neo 16，绿色：配备 Oasis 的 Neo 16）

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


45.3 °C	47.8 °C	42.3 °C
46.9 °C	46.7 °C	38.5 °C
32.4 °C	34.6 °C	33.7 °C

Maximum: 47.8 °C
Average: 40.9 °C


43.5 °C	46.7 °C	42.1 °C
38.3 °C	43.5 °C	43.9 °C
33.6 °C	34.9 °C	35.2 °C

Maximum: 46.7 °C
Average: 40.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 62.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


28.1 °C	28.4 °C	28.2 °C
27.8 °C	28.2 °C	27.7 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27.4 °C

Maximum: 28.4 °C
Average: 27.8 °C


28.4 °C	28.9 °C	28.3 °C
28.1 °C	28.5 °C	28.3 °C
27.4 °C	27.9 °C	27.7 °C

Maximum: 28.9 °C
Average: 28.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


43.8 °C	47.1 °C	41.7 °C
44 °C	45.7 °C	37.8 °C
31.4 °C	34 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 47.1 °C
Average: 39.8 °C


42.7 °C	46.1 °C	42.1 °C
37.8 °C	42.7 °C	42.2 °C
32.7 °C	33.9 °C	33.7 °C

Maximum: 46.1 °C
Average: 39.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 58 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.7 °C / -10.3 F).

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat		-9%	-1%	4%	-12%	-2%
Maximum Upper Side *	47.8	44.2 8%	42.6 11%	42.8 10%	39 18%	47 2%
Maximum Bottom *	46.7	48.1 -3%	41.2 12%	50.2 -7%	51 -9%	56 -20%
Idle Upper Side *	28.4	33 -16%	32.6 -15%	27.6 3%	36 -27%	27 5%
Idle Bottom *	28.9	36.1 -25%	32.4 -12%	26.2 9%	38 -31%	27 7%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

它的立体声扬声器经过再次改进，现在拥有丰富的音效。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.36 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 电池寿命长

耗电量

闲置时，Neo 16 可以从默认激活的局部调光功能中获益，尤其是在结合深色背景图像的情况下，我们测得的最大 15.8 瓦耗电量真的很省钱。另一方面，在显示白色图片或停用局部调光时，我们测得的功耗接近 30 瓦。在负载测试中，我们测得笔记本电脑的最大功率为 415 瓦，随后稳定在 280 瓦左右。在连接 Oasis 的情况下，最大值为 480 瓦，然后稳定在 360 瓦。在空闲模式下，Oasis 使笔记本电脑的功耗增加了约 1.7 瓦。

所提供的 420 瓦电源装置体积足够大，但温度很高，而且从电源装置到笔记本电脑的电缆很短（80 厘米）。在大多数情况下，这根线不够长，无法将电源装置放在地板上。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.26 / 2.2 Watt
Idle	11.8 / 15.1 / 15.8 Watt
Load	165.3 / 415.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WD PC SN8000S 2TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WDC PC SN810 2TB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-44%	-68%	-25%	-35%	0%	-33%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	11.8	22.5 -91%	28.5 -142%	9.9 16%	25 -112%	6 49%	16.2 ?(9.4 - 29, n=8) -37%	14 ?(2 - 39, n=119, last 2 years) -19%
Idle Average *	15.1	32.2 -113%	38.8 -157%	28.6 -89%	29.4 -95%	16 -6%	25.6 ?(13.5 - 39.2, n=8) -70%	19.8 ?(8 - 55.6, n=119, last 2 years) -31%
Idle Maximum *	15.8	34.3 -117%	45.6 -189%	47.1 -198%	31 -96%	28 -77%	30.7 ?(13.7 - 48, n=8) -94%	27.1 ?(9 - 101.1, n=119, last 2 years) -72%
Load Average *	165.3	169.3 -2%	132.2 20%	141.8 14%	109 34%	130 21%	140.4 ?(109 - 169.3, n=8) 15%	105.4 ?(32.1 - 201, n=117, last 2 years) 36%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	296	294 1%	318 -7%	253 15%	290 2%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	289	288 -0%	319 -10%	230 20%	292 -1%
Load Maximum *	415.5	371.5 11%	384 8%	233 44%	325 22%	361 13%	322 ?(217 - 431, n=8) 23%	251 ?(64.5 - 431, n=119, last 2 years) 40%
Witcher 3 ultra *						302

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø285 (243-415)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.6 (10.6-15.2)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø296 (288-307)

Power consumption with external monitor

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø239 (231-266)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø259 (251-266)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø38.8 (32.6-61.9)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø255 (247-260)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø221 (215-279)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11.3 (8.2-16.5)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø289 (284-297)

运行时间

在运行时间测试中，Neo 16 的表现同样出色，尤其是在 150 cd/m² 和 60 Hz 的 WLAN 测试中，它的运行时间长达 9.5 小时。不过，在全亮度条件下，你将不得不为笔记本电脑的明亮显示屏付出代价，它只能维持不到 4 个小时。播放视频的时间略高于 7.5 小时。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		9h 32min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		3h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 01min

	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.8 Wh	Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 83 Wh	Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-32%	-52%	-40%	-21%	-16%	-21%
H.264	460				346 -25%	418 -9%	461 ?(129 - 898, n=54, last 2 years) 0%
WiFi v1.3	572	388 -32%	323 -44%	350 -39%	404 -29%	350 -39%	388 ?(85 - 889, n=120, last 2 years) -32%
Load	121		48 -60%	71 -41%	110 -9%	122 1%	85.3 ?(41 - 164, n=79, last 2 years) -30%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Back to the verdict

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop - 05/14/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

88 / 98 → 89%

Keyboard

89%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

79 / 80 → 99%

Weight

58 / 10-68 → 82%

Battery

84 / 95 → 88%

Display

92%

Games Performance

94%

Application Performance

96%

Temperature

85 / 95 → 90%

Noise

69 / 90 → 76%

Audio

84%

Camera

37 / 75 → 49%

Average

63%

90%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
73.1%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 30.9%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	2207
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2223
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2223
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	2254
i9-14900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	2352
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D R9 9950X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	2365
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Ultra 9 285K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	2436
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
R9 7950X, Radeon RX 7900 GRE	51189
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 Super Gaming OC 12G i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER	51572
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	51894
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	52067
R9 7950X, Radeon RX 6950 XT	52806
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	53282
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	53282
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论 - XMG Neo 16 性能良好，但在连接性方面存在缺陷

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

外壳和连接

尺寸比较

配件 - XMG Oasis（Mk2-V4）

维护

可持续性

保修

输入设备 - 舒适的键盘

显示屏 - 超亮迷你 LED 面板

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - Arrow Lake-HX 最高 128GB 内存

测试条件

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HX

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU

游戏性能

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

排放 - Oasis 可帮助解决体积和温度问题

噪音排放

温度

发言人

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop audio analysis

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 audio analysis

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 audio analysis

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H audio analysis

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis

能源管理 - 电池寿命长

耗电量

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Notebookcheck 总评分

可能的替代品比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency