华硕 ProArt P16 5090 评测--串联 OLED 和 RTX 5090 对决Apple MacBook Pro 16

Name: Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090
Brand: Asus

纤细、黑色、敏捷。

华硕（Asus）正在进行升级，其 ProArt P16 现已推出，配备了极为明亮的串联 OLED 面板和配备 24 GB VRAM 的移动GeForce RTX 5090。这是一款完美的多媒体笔记本电脑，也是Apple'MacBook Pro 16 与 M4 Max 期待已久的 Windows 替代产品吗？
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/26/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI Blackwell RTX 5000 Laptop / Notebook Wi-Fi 7 Zen 5 Touchscreen

结论 - ProArt P16 是最适合创作者的 Windows 笔记本电脑

通过功能更强大的 ProArt P16，华硕如愿以偿。新的串联 OLED 面板比以前亮度更高，画质出色，甚至支持 4K 分辨率。RTX 5090 移动版包含 24 GB 的 VRAM，现在的图形性能也比以前大幅提升。P16 的其他积极功能都得到了保留，因此是目前 Windows 世界中最好的创作者笔记本电脑。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

负载情况下相对较大的风扇噪音以及焊接内存仍然是薄弱环节。此外，二级固态硬盘插槽只能通过 PCIe 4.0 x2 连接，性能受到限制，电池续航能力也稍弱。

其他设备，如联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16、在显示性能方面，ProArt P16 可以与华硕保持一致（甚至略胜一筹），但在图形性能方面，ProArt P16 则完全不同。与 Apple MacBook Pro M4 Max、M4 Max（以及 M4 Pro）的 CPU 性能要好得多，电池寿命也比 ProArt 长很多。

总之，ProArt P16 目前在 Windows 系统领域独树一帜，由于其出色的 OLED 面板，它甚至可以与游戏本 ROG Zephyrus G16 相媲美。

Pros

+ 明亮、精确的 4K 串联 OLED

+ 配备 24GB VRAM 的 RTX 5090

+ 高品质的紧凑型铝合金机箱

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 出色的输入设备

+ 2 个固态硬盘插槽

+ 良好的 CPU 和系统性能

+ 64 GB 内存

+ Wi-Fi 7

Cons

- RAM 已焊接

- 负载时声音很大

- PWM 闪烁

- 辅助固态硬盘只有 PCIe 4.0 x2

价格和供应情况

配备 RTX 5090 的 ProArt P16 目前无法从华硕购买。

结论 - ProArt P16 是最适合创作者的 Windows 笔记本电脑
规格
与配备 RTX 5070 的 ProArt P16 的区别
显示屏 - 1,600 cd/m² Lumina Pro
性能 - RTX 5090，120 瓦
排放与能源
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品比较

ProArt P16 基于 ROG Zephyrus G16游戏笔记本电脑。到目前为止，这款多媒体衍生产品只配备了 RTX 5070 和 2.8K OLED，亮度并不是特别高。华硕推出了新的变体，除了为 Nvidia 最快的移动显卡提供更强大的散热外，还配备了全新的 4K Lumina Pro 串联 OLED 显示屏，以此回应外界的批评。我们评测的是顶级型号，配备 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、64 GB 内存、2x 2 TB SSD 存储、Lumina Pro 显示屏和移动GeForce RTX 5090，TGP 为 120 瓦，建议零售价为 3999 美元。

规格

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (ProArt P16 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 12 x 2 - 5.1 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Strix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)

Graphics adapter

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 2760 MHz, RAM: 1763 MHz, 120 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 581.57, Optimus

Memory

64 GB

, LPDDR5x-7500, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, ATNA60HC03-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA, 2048 GB

, 2x 2 TB, 3604 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB4 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18.3 x 354.9 x 246.9

Battery

90 Wh, 5820 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 6 Speakers (4x 2W Woofers, 2x 2W Tweeters), Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 240W PSU, Xbox PC Game Pass (3-month), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.952 kg, Power Supply: 730 g

Price

4799 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

与配备 RTX 5070 的 ProArt P16 的区别

从外观上看，新款顶级机型与旧款几乎没有区别，机箱也几乎完全相同。新的蒸气室冷却系统使重量增加了约 120 克，需要更多空间，这也是机箱厚度增加一毫米的原因。质量水平依然很高；不过，考虑到其触摸屏，铰链可能会更紧一些。有关连接和输入设备的更多信息，请参阅 ProArt P17 RTX 5070 的评测中。.

尺寸比较

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX DIN A4 ❌

显示屏 - 1,600 cd/m² Lumina Pro

华硕 ProArt P16 的新型 Lumina Pro 显示屏采用串联式 OLED 面板，分辨率为 3,840 x 2,400 像素，刷新率为 120 Hz。两层发光层层叠在一起，据说这样可以提高亮度、色彩更鲜艳、能耗更低。主观画质非常出色，虽然触摸层会使明亮的内容在仔细观察时略显粗糙，但在正常观看距离下并不明显。这当然是高层次的抱怨，但无论是在 Yoga Pro 9i 16和 MacBook Pro 16 安装的迷你 LED 面板 MacBook Pro 16(都有这个问题。由于采用了 120 Hz 频率，响应时间非常快，显示动作也非常流畅。

ROG Zephyrus G16 和之前的 ProArt P16 的 2.8K OLED 屏幕、在亮度方面并不特别令人信服。上面的两张对比图片立即凸显了新的 Lumina Pro 面板亮度增加后带来的不同。在 SDR 模式下，亮度不再是 360 cd/m²，而是高达 660 cd/m²。MacBook Pro（启用亮度传感器）和 Yoga Pro 9i 16 甚至能达到约 1,000 cd/m²。

对于 HDR 内容，以前约为 430 cd/m²，现在图像部分高达 1,600 cd/m²，与Apple 和联想的两个竞争对手相当。全白图像的亮度仍约为 850 cd/m²。


666 cd/m²	659 cd/m²	662 cd/m²
663 cd/m²	661 cd/m²	662 cd/m²
664 cd/m²	660 cd/m²	666 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

ATNA60HC03-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 666 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 662.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 661 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
88.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
98.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6565 K

	Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 ATNA60HC03-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 120 Hz	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2", 120 Hz	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 ATNA60KA01-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz	Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz
Display		3%	-2%	0%	2%	1%
Display P3 Coverage (%)	98.9	99.9 1%	96.1 -3%	99.7 1%	97.4 -2%	99.5 1%
sRGB Coverage (%)	100	100 0%	99.9 0%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)	88.6	96.9 9%	85 -4%	88.8 0%	96.8 9%	89.5 1%
Response Times		36%	20%	-7809%	23%	-39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	0.3 ?(0.14, 0.16)	0.22 27%	0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1) 33%	43 ?(9.6, 33.4) -14233%	0.27 ?(0.13, 0.14) 10%	0.63 ?(0.34, 0.29) -110%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	0.45 ?(0.26, 0.19)	0.25 44%	0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) 44%	41.2 ?(24.5, 16.7) -9056%	0.37 ?(0.2, 0.17) 18%	0.63 ?(0.36, 0.27) -40%
PWM Frequency (Hz)	480 ?(80)	960	960 ?(100)	14880	1200	480 ?(100)
PWM Amplitude * (%)	38		44 -16%	90 -137%	22 42%	26 32%
Screen		-116%	-92%	-9%	-21%	-49%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	661	416 -37%	391 -41%	632 -4%	974 47%	362 -45%
Brightness (cd/m²)	663	418 -37%	393 -41%	616 -7%	979 48%	363 -45%
Brightness Distribution (%)	99	96 -3%	98 -1%	95 -4%	98 -1%	99 0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.5	1.6 -220%	1.2 -140%	0.6 -20%	0.9 -80%	0.8 -60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.4	2.1 -50%	3.2 -129%	1.2 14%	1.7 -21%	1.8 -29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	0.6	2.7 -350%	1.8 -200%	0.8 -33%	1.3 -117%	1.3 -117%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.16 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6565 ^99%	6331 ^103%	6493 ^100%	6450 ^101%	6751 ^96%	6741 ^96%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-26% / -56%	-25% / -42%	-2606% / -1957%	1% / -4%	-29% / -34%

* ... smaller is better

像往常一样，华硕提供了各种显示配置文件，我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对其进行了分析。Native 配置文件的饱和度略高，显示的色彩更加鲜艳，如果你对色彩精确度要求不高，这看起来不错。使用 P3 和 sRGB 显示配置文件可以达到这种效果，但我们即使使用自己的校准也无法改善。该面板完全覆盖了 P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间，在图像/视频编辑方面表现出色，但这同样适用于它的两个竞争对手。Yoga 甚至覆盖了 AdobeRGB 色彩空间。

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.26 ms rise
0.45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.19 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.14 ms rise
0.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.16 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

480 Hz
Amplitude: 38 %

≤ 80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

直流调光的亮度范围为 80-50%，低于这一亮度时，PWM 闪烁可能会造成更大的损害。华硕还通过软件提供无闪烁 OLED 调光功能。

性能 - RTX 5090，120 瓦

测试条件

我们使用性能电源配置文件进行了以下基准测试和测量。不过，在日常使用中，我们建议使用 "耳语 "模式，因为风扇的噪音会明显降低。即使在手动模式下，图形处理器的功耗也只有 120 瓦。

能源概况	CPU 负载	CB 2024 Multi	GPU 负载	Time Spy 图形	赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra	最大风扇体积
Whisper	60/45 瓦	1,153 点	55 瓦	11,915 点	56.6fps	42.2 dB(A)
标准	70/65 瓦	1,194 分	105 瓦	18,123 分	87.4fps	47.6 dB(A)
性能	80 瓦	1,242 分	120 瓦	19,403 分	90.8fps	53.2 dB(A)

处理器

处理器没有任何变化，而且 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370继续提供稳定可靠的性能，与 M4 Pro 的强大性能相比毫不逊色，更不用说 M4 Max 了。在电池供电的情况下，性能几乎完全保持稳定。

Cinebench R15 多重持续测试

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3483 (3448.87-3508.77)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø3112 (3034.67-3332.5)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3489 (3470.41-3505.08)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores): Ø3647 (3596.15-3782.15)

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø3323 (3231.02-3495.89)

Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3420 (3174.1-3461.7)

CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance rating
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max ^-8! Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	93.4 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro ^-12! Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)	92.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	78.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	77.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	75.2 pt
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	74.6 pt
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	73.8 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	71.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia	59.3 pt

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	2069 Points +67%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	2015 Points +62%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)	1729 Points +39%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1284 Points +3%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1242 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	1215 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1194 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	1189 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (621 - 1299, n=31)	1083 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2069, n=67, last 2 years)	998 Points -20%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)	178 Points +53%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	178 Points +53%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	128 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	127.6 Points +10%
Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 200, n=49, last 2 years)	123.6 Points +7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	118 Points +2%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	117 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (113.6 - 121, n=21)	116.9 Points +1%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	116 Points

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	27595 Points +16%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	23859 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	23856 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	23805 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	23576 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)	23437 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	22080 Points -7%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23902, n=31)	20655 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 30783, n=83, last 2 years)	15881 Points -33%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)	2290 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	2209 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2164 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2133 Points +6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2039 Points +1%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2018 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2012 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1921 - 2049, n=24)	2010 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2459, n=75, last 2 years)	1848 Points -8%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	9268 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	9250 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	9214 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	9208 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6449 - 9280, n=23)	8385 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8251 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	6995 Points -24%
Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 11924, n=65, last 2 years)	5920 Points -36%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	827 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	817 Points +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	800 Points +2%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	791 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (753 - 804, n=23)	789 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	788 Points
Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=65, last 2 years)	679 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	563 Points -29%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	3647 (3596.15^min, 3596.23^P1 - 3782.15^max) Points +4%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3509 (3448.87^min - 3508.77^max) Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3505 (3470.41^min - 3505.08^max) Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3496 (3231.02^min - 3495.89^max) Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3462 (3174.1^min - 3461.7^max) Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3333 (3034.67^min - 3332.5^max) Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3551, n=23)	3256 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=73, last 2 years)	2492 Points -29%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	322 Points +65%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	318 Points +63%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	310 Points +59%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	307 Points +57%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (188.8 - 315, n=23)	292 Points +49%
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=68, last 2 years)	265 Points +36%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	195.5 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	192.1 Points -2%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=67, last 2 years)	258 Seconds * -84%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	159 Seconds * -14%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (139 - 192, n=24)	155 Seconds * -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	151 Seconds * -8%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	144 Seconds * -3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	140 Seconds * -0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	140 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	83714 MIPS +2%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	82191 MIPS 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	81816 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (66154 - 84735, n=23)	78603 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	71959 MIPS -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	69676 MIPS -15%
Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=60, last 2 years)	59102 MIPS -28%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6252 MIPS +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6235 MIPS +3%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (5859 - 6497, n=23)	6174 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6136 MIPS +1%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6080 MIPS
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6033 MIPS -1%
Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=60, last 2 years)	5743 MIPS -6%

Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	25760 Points +65%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)	22509 Points +45%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	17903 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	17207 Points +11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15671 Points +1%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15567 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15562 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11973 - 16311, n=25)	14700 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 25760, n=79, last 2 years)	13740 Points -12%

Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	3880 Points +33%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)	3836 Points +31%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3015 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2942 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2923 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2919 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2909 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2780 - 2965, n=25)	2889 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 4326, n=75, last 2 years)	2745 Points -6%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	17487 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15818 Points +3%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15519 Points +1%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15416 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15407 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11394 - 16322, n=24)	14349 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 23059, n=66, last 2 years)	12384 Points -20%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2142 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2136 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2133 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2128 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2108 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2175, n=24)	2091 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (805 - 2974, n=66, last 2 years)	1903 Points -11%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	28.7 fps 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	28.6 fps
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	27.9 fps -2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	27.2 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	25.9 fps -9%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 28.7, n=23)	25.5 fps -11%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=60, last 2 years)	17.4 fps -39%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (46.8 - 72.6, n=23)	54.3 s * -15%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	51.8 s * -10%
Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=61, last 2 years)	50.4 s * -7%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	47.3 s *
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	46.8 s * +1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	43.5 s * +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	42.8 s * +10%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=60, last 2 years)	0.4781 sec * -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	0.4312 sec * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.3892 - 0.603, n=23)	0.4213 sec * -3%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.41 sec *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	0.4079 sec * +1%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.4039 sec * +1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.3979 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3509 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

234 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

195.5 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

788 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

9214 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

23856 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2012 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

116 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1242 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance rating
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	96.7 pt
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	94 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	92.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	87.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	78.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	72.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia	58.9 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	37602 KRay/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	37324 KRay/s +7%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	34951 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37804, n=22)	33707 KRay/s -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	24612 KRay/s -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	23492 KRay/s -33%
Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=58, last 2 years)	17014 KRay/s -51%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	148045 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	146777 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	142039 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (95655 - 148045, n=23)	130508 Points -12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	129641 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	116017 Points -22%
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=59, last 2 years)	79709 Points -46%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	5909 MB/s +19%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	5879 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	5824 MB/s +18%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5932, n=23)	5434 MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	5206 MB/s +5%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	4946 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (1188 - 8623, n=59, last 2 years)	3681 MB/s -26%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	94868 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	94435 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88891 Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (41744 - 99232, n=23)	85990 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=59, last 2 years)	81979 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	67157 Points -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	64720 Points -31%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	19115 Points +1%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	18870 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	18836 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19120, n=23)	18417 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=59, last 2 years)	9996 Points -47%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	9378 Points -50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9089 Points -52%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	79311 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	78761 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	75107 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (50357 - 93798, n=22)	69952 Points -12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	64632 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	61884 Points -22%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=58, last 2 years)	40114 Points -49%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	118518 MB/s
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	114722 MB/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67015 - 118993, n=23)	87780 MB/s -26%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	84347 MB/s -29%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82547 MB/s -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	79949 MB/s -33%
Average of class Multimedia (26066 - 169946, n=59, last 2 years)	72657 MB/s -39%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1514 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1514 MB/s
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1508 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1077 - 1530, n=23)	1401 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1366 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1233 MB/s -19%
Average of class Multimedia (440 - 2022, n=59, last 2 years)	976 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	20538 KRay/s +11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	20284 KRay/s +10%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	18420 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13665 - 20648, n=23)	18302 KRay/s -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	13527 KRay/s -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	12887 KRay/s -30%
Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=59, last 2 years)	9282 KRay/s -50%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	65167 MPixel/s +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	58622 MPixel/s +19%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	51417 MPixel/s +5%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	49140 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (36752 - 51727, n=23)	48324 MPixel/s -2%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	47640 MPixel/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 65787, n=59, last 2 years)	44202 MPixel/s -10%

系统性能

P16 是一款反应非常灵敏的电脑，在测试过程中没有出现任何稳定性问题。

Performance rating: Percent
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total

Performance rating
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	91.9 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z	88.5 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	76.2 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	74.9 pt
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	69.9 pt
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	69.4 pt
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	69.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	65.6 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 ^-4! GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	48 pt

CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	2255 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z	2148 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	2077 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2064 Points +6%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	1956 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	1956 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	1897 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2426, n=67, last 2 years)	1765 Points -10%

CrossMark / Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	2042 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z	1980 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	1920 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1918 Points +8%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	1768 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	1768 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	1718 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2344, n=67, last 2 years)	1667 Points -6%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	2795 Points +18%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z	2590 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	2438 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2416 Points +2%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	2362 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	2362 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	2259 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2820, n=67, last 2 years)	2006 Points -15%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	1629 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1604 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	1595 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z	1566 Points +4%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	1516 Points +1%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	1505 Points
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	1505 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=67, last 2 years)	1440 Points -4%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	543 Points +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z	525 Points +76%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	345 Points +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	333 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=70, last 2 years)	330 Points +11%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	326 Points +9%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	321 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (298 - 321, n=2)	310 Points +4%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	298 Points

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	353 Points +45%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z	337 Points +38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	311 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	311 Points +27%
Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 384, n=64, last 2 years)	276 Points +13%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	275 Points +13%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	268 Points +10%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (244 - 268, n=2)	256 Points +5%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	244 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=73, last 2 years)	472 ms * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	450 ms * -5%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	444 ms * -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	433 ms * -1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	429 ms * -0%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (427 - 429, n=2)	428 ms * -0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	427 ms *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	256.2 ms * +40%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z	254.3 ms * +40%

* ... smaller is better

» No benchmarks for this notebook found!

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	109252 MB/s +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	97515 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	93640 MB/s +5%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88852 MB/s
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	87895 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (72702 - 93640, n=23)	84835 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 109252, n=59, last 2 years)	77464 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	102937 MB/s +3%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	99870 MB/s
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	97418 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84635 - 102937, n=23)	95368 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	85799 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	78309 MB/s -22%
Average of class Multimedia (24312 - 125604, n=59, last 2 years)	78201 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	103860 MB/s +5%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	98750 MB/s
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	98180 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (80685 - 108954, n=23)	95713 MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia (24382 - 117933, n=59, last 2 years)	75917 MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	75293 MB/s -24%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	68498 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	128.7 ns * -20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	121.6 ns * -13%
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=59, last 2 years)	115.4 ns * -7%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	107.8 ns * -0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	107.6 ns *
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	103.6 ns * +4%
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (86.7 - 119.4, n=23)	101.9 ns * +5%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的 P16 在使用实时音频应用程序时表现出了局限性。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	4785 μs *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	3220.2 μs * +33%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	2011.5 μs * +58%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	602.8 μs * +87%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	492.6 μs * +90%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

在我们的评测设备中，隐藏着两块相同的 2 TB 固态硬盘。主固态硬盘的传输速度也不错，但副固态硬盘由于仅通过 PCIe 4.0 x2 连接，性能明显较低。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6985 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6135 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 501 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 536 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 64.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 161.6 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 535 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 780 MB/s

Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance rating - Percent
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	86 pt
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	72.1 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	69.2 pt
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	68.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	67.8 pt
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	62.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia	59.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3790 (2816.71^min - 3789.94^max) MB/s +27%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	3430 (3377.21^min - 3430.31^max) MB/s +15%
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (2980 - 3283, n=2)	3132 MB/s +5%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	2980 (2937.06^min - 2980.17^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (453 - 4553, n=61, last 2 years)	2890 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	2813 (2561.46^min - 2812.95^max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1607 (236.92^min - 1606.84^max) MB/s -46%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	3794 (3585.08^min - 3793.54^max) MB/s +6%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	3658 (3544.19^min - 3657.64^max) MB/s +2%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	3573 (3493.58^min - 3572.69^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (3481 - 3573, n=2)	3527 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3362 (2028.5^min - 3361.51^max) MB/s -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	3311 (2846.25^min - 3310.56^max) MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia (384 - 5711, n=61, last 2 years)	3129 MB/s -12%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (6933 - 6974, n=2)	6954 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	6933 (6135.43^min - 6932.53^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	6863 (5958.67^min - 6862.63^max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	6780 (5762.77^min - 6780.16^max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	6278 (5683.91^min - 6278.45^max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Multimedia (467 - 7126, n=61, last 2 years)	5319 MB/s -23%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	5265 (4622.32^min - 5264.52^max) MB/s -24%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	6251 (5536.69^min - 6250.77^max) MB/s +2%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	6158 (6000.16^min - 6157.92^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (5925 - 6158, n=2)	6042 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	5861 (4855.26^min - 5860.72^max) MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	4844 (4270.43^min - 4843.96^max) MB/s -21%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	4595 (4484.55^min - 4595.28^max) MB/s -25%
Average of class Multimedia (247 - 6898, n=61, last 2 years)	4164 MB/s -32%
4k q1 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	78.7 (77.61^min - 78.69^max) MB/s +59%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	69.2 (68.61^min - 69.17^max) MB/s +40%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	67.9 (65.35^min - 67.9^max) MB/s +37%
Average of class Multimedia (18.8 - 97.7, n=61, last 2 years)	61 MB/s +23%
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (49.5 - 68.7, n=2)	59.1 MB/s +19%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	54 (50.82^min - 54.02^max) MB/s +9%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	49.5 (49.2^min - 49.48^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	265 (258.55^min - 264.55^max) MB/s +204%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	165.3 (162.66^min - 165.27^max) MB/s +89%
Average of class Multimedia (40.3 - 378, n=61, last 2 years)	157.6 MB/s +81%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	146.1 (142.34^min - 146.11^max) MB/s +67%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	138.8 (136.15^min - 138.79^max) MB/s +59%
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (87.3 - 177.6, n=2)	132.5 MB/s +52%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	87.3 (84.77^min - 87.3^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3189 (3182.48^min - 3189.1^max) MB/s +264%
Average of class Multimedia (190.3 - 4881, n=61, last 2 years)	1357 MB/s +55%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	1031 (762.04^min - 1030.66^max) MB/s +18%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	875 (772.07^min - 875.46^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	848 (703.36^min - 848.14^max) MB/s -3%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	789 (748.32^min - 789.25^max) MB/s -10%
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (637 - 875, n=2)	756 MB/s -14%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2210 (729.15^min - 2210.24^max) MB/s +457%
Average of class Multimedia (154.9 - 3628, n=61, last 2 years)	982 MB/s +147%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	517 (500.08^min - 517.38^max) MB/s +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	456 (68.45^min - 456.36^max) MB/s +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	447 (386.71^min - 446.89^max) MB/s +13%
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (397 - 496, n=2)	447 MB/s +13%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	397 (383.42^min - 396.66^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	7379 Points +20%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	6127 Points
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (5302 - 6127, n=2)	5715 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	5291 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	4945 Points -19%
Average of class Multimedia (482 - 9251, n=57, last 2 years)	4892 Points -20%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	4441 Points -28%
Score Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3215 Points +151%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	1592 Points +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1569 Points +22%
Average of class Multimedia (192 - 3547, n=57, last 2 years)	1551 Points +21%
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (1281 - 1354, n=2)	1318 Points +3%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	1281 Points
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	1160 Points -9%
Score Write
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	4225 Points
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (3322 - 4225, n=2)	3774 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	2944 Points -30%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	2719 Points -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2635 Points -38%
Average of class Multimedia (191 - 4521, n=57, last 2 years)	2602 Points -38%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2571 Points -39%
Seq Read
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	5170 MB/s +1%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	5104 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	5081 MB/s 0%
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (5021 - 5104, n=2)	5063 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	4884 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia (484 - 5730, n=57, last 2 years)	4245 MB/s -17%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	4200 MB/s -18%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	4160 MB/s +3%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	4055 MB/s
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (3375 - 4055, n=2)	3715 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	3567 MB/s -12%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	3296 MB/s -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	3282 MB/s -19%
Average of class Multimedia (344 - 5698, n=57, last 2 years)	2918 MB/s -28%
4K Read
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	76.7 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	72.1 MB/s +7%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	67.3 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	64.4 MB/s -4%
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (60.5 - 67.3, n=2)	63.9 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia (17.5 - 97.4, n=57, last 2 years)	60.2 MB/s -11%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	52.1 MB/s -23%
4K Write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	230 MB/s +10%
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (209 - 231, n=2)	220 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	217 MB/s +4%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	209 MB/s
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	196.9 MB/s -6%
Average of class Multimedia (43.1 - 328, n=57, last 2 years)	185.3 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	158.8 MB/s -24%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2642 MB/s +276%
Average of class Multimedia (125.7 - 2906, n=57, last 2 years)	1066 MB/s +52%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1009 MB/s +44%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	999 MB/s +42%
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (703 - 792, n=2)	747 MB/s +6%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	703 MB/s
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	688 MB/s -2%
4K-64 Write
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	3610 MB/s
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (2753 - 3610, n=2)	3182 MB/s -12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	2429 MB/s -33%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	2193 MB/s -39%
Average of class Multimedia (75.2 - 3969, n=57, last 2 years)	2125 MB/s -41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2090 MB/s -42%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	1926 MB/s -47%
Access Time Read
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (0.024 - 0.098, n=2)	0.061 ms * -154%
Average of class Multimedia (0.019 - 0.168, n=57, last 2 years)	0.05195 ms * -116%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	0.051 ms * -113%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	0.035 ms * -46%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	0.032 ms * -33%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	0.03 ms * -25%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	0.024 ms *
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia (0.014 - 0.754, n=57, last 2 years)	0.07126 ms * -275%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	0.025 ms * -32%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	0.021 ms * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	0.019 ms * -0%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	0.019 ms * -0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	0.019 ms *
Average Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA (0.017 - 0.019, n=2)	0.018 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

持续读取性能：DiskSpd 循环读取，队列深度 8

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6960 (6571.29-6976.69)

图形处理器性能

顶级型号使用移动 GeForce RTX 5090TGP 为 120 瓦（95 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost），这使得 P16 与 ROG Zephyrus G16 不相上下。不过，与游戏型号相比，P16 只提供了标准的 Optimus 图形切换功能。尽管如此，图形性能仍略高于 Zephyrus G16，尽管后者也使用了一代更老的驱动程序，也出现了一些性能问题。根据不同的基准测试， RTX 5070的性能要比前一代 ProArt P16 快 30-70 %。Apple's M4 Max在Steel Nomad Light 基准测试中明显落后。不过，在针对 Adobe 应用程序的 BudgetBench creator 基准测试中，MacBook 更胜一筹。使用电池供电时，GPU 性能下降了约 60%。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	70760 Points +18%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (48548 - 80022, n=18)	67438 Points +12%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	60002 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	54052 Points -10%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	45564 Points -24%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	44109 Points -26%
Average of class Multimedia (3765 - 60002, n=58, last 2 years)	19327 Points -68%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	52065 Points +6%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42175 - 62849, n=21)	51762 Points +6%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	48907 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	42516 Points -13%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	34440 Points -30%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	34292 Points -30%
Average of class Multimedia (2328 - 48907, n=62, last 2 years)	13884 Points -72%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (19216 - 25984, n=20)	23746 Points +22%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	22082 Points +14%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	19403 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	19216 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	13187 Points -32%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13010 Points -33%
Average of class Multimedia (696 - 19403, n=63, last 2 years)	5337 Points -72%
Steel Nomad Score
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (4791 - 6329, n=15)	5905 Points +19%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	5652 Points +14%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	4959 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	4791 Points -3%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2935 Points -41%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2906 Points -41%
Average of class Multimedia (47 - 4959, n=35, last 2 years)	1283 Points -74%
Steel Nomad Light Score
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (18624 - 27244, n=9)	24478 Points +16%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	22897 Points +9%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	21012 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	18624 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	13989 Points -33%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	13721 Points -35%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13261 Points -37%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)	7781 Points -63%
Average of class Multimedia (1147 - 21012, n=37, last 2 years)	6044 Points -71%
Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	25160 Points +21%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (18775 - 27291, n=8)	24442 Points +18%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	20771 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	18775 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	14212 Points -32%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13765 Points -34%
Average of class Multimedia (5266 - 20771, n=6, last 2 years)	11424 Points -45%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	46229 Points +24%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (34972 - 49864, n=8)	44673 Points +20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	37434 Points 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	37299 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	34972 Points -6%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	24210 Points -35%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	23832 Points -36%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)	19345 Points -48%
Average of class Multimedia (3164 - 37434, n=29, last 2 years)	15254 Points -59%
Wild Life Extreme
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (36205 - 50438, n=8)	44119 Points +18%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	40036 Points +7%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	37329 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	36205 Points -3%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	22240 Points -40%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	20040 Points -46%
Average of class Multimedia (3224 - 37329, n=19, last 2 years)	14468 Points -61%

3DMark 11 Performance		41547 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		36150 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		16828 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		4959 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		21012 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score		20771 points
Help

... in comparison

Photoshop PugetBench - Overall Score 1.01
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	13859 Points +56%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z	12494 Points +40%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	8893 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	8879 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	8044 Points -10%

Premiere Pro PugetBench - Overall Score 1.1
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	12662 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	12412 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	12222 Points +10%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	11107 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z	8835 Points -20%

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom METAL | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia (12 - 105, n=26, last 2 years)	41.9 Seconds * -249%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	24 Seconds * -100%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	19 Seconds * -58%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13 Seconds * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	12 Seconds * -0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	12 Seconds *
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9 - 18, n=18)	11.9 Seconds * +1%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia (20 - 164, n=25, last 2 years)	65.8 Seconds * -229%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	35 Seconds * -75%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	33 Seconds * -65%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	20 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	19 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	18 Seconds * +10%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 37, n=16)	17.8 Seconds * +11%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 121, n=8, last 2 years)	57.8 Seconds *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	17.8 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia (160 - 1042, n=68, last 2 years)	423 Seconds * -101%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	259 Seconds * -23%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	251 Seconds * -20%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	211 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	210 Seconds * -0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	210 Seconds *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M4 Max (16 cores)	167 Seconds * +20%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (123 - 259, n=17)	158.6 Seconds * +24%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

移动 RTX 5090 也非常适合游戏。不过，这款快速 GPU 只有在 QHD 和 4K 分辨率下才能真正发挥出它的威力，ProArt 和 Zephyrus 在这方面的性能大致相当。刀锋战士刀锋 16在玩游戏时受益于更高的 TGP（160 瓦），即使在长时间负载的情况下，游戏性能也能保持稳定。

Performance rating - Percent
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	96.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	94.5 pt
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	92.8 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	87.1 pt
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	83.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia	39.6 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	112.3 (87.5^min) fps 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	112.3 (80.7^min) fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	105.3 (74.7^min) fps -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	98.3 (80^min) fps -12%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	97.8 (75^min) fps -13%
Average of class Multimedia (6.41 - 112.3, n=70, last 2 years)	36.7 fps -67%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	162 fps +2%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	158.7 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	143.1 fps -10%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	127.3 fps -20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	87.3 fps -45%
Average of class Multimedia (7.8 - 158.7, n=58, last 2 years)	48 fps -70%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	138.9 (2.68^min, 111.1^P1) fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	136.6 (3.95^min, 90.9^P1) fps +13%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	121.6 (8.28^min, 83.3^P1) fps +1%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	121.1 (5.44^min, 76.9^P1) fps 0%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	120.5 (6.64^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (9.38 - 141.6, n=60, last 2 years)	50.7 fps -58%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	154.4 fps +7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	147.4 fps +2%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	144.4 fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	140.3 fps -3%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	132 fps -9%
Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 144.4, n=63, last 2 years)	48.8 fps -66%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	319 (126.4^min, 227^P1) fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	308 (45.6^min, 231^P1) fps +2%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	303 (64.6^min, 227^P1) fps
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	247 (102.7^min, 187.2^P1) fps -18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	246 (113.4^min, 185.6^P1) fps -19%
Average of class Multimedia (13.3 - 303, n=62, last 2 years)	87 fps -71%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	143.6 (124.1^min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	141.9 (124.2^min) fps +7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	137.1 (113.2^min) fps +4%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	132.4 (112.3^min) fps
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	130.9 (111.6^min) fps -1%
Average of class Multimedia (29 - 179.9, n=65, last 2 years)	86.7 fps -35%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	95.2 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	91.4 fps +14%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	85.2 fps +7%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	79.9 fps
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	73.9 fps -8%
Average of class Multimedia (16.9 - 141.1, n=60, last 2 years)	56.2 fps -30%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24 | F1 25 | GTA V

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 122.8, n=22)	108.5 fps +19%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	98.6 (74.5^min) fps +9%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	90.8 (72.6^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	83.2 (70.1^min) fps -8%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	64.6 (54.8^min) fps -29%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	62.8 (53.8^min) fps -31%
Average of class Multimedia (9.21 - 90.8, n=26, last 2 years)	39 fps -57%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset DLSS4 quality no FG
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (94.1 - 136.6, n=13)	121 fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	104.6 (74.9^min) fps +4%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	100.7 (78.8^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	94.1 (81.4^min) fps -7%
Average of class Multimedia (63.9 - 100.7, n=3, last 2 years)	79.3 fps -21%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	73.4 (63.4^min) fps -27%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (103.1 - 174.8, n=20)	146.4 fps +21%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	138.8 fps +15%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	121 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	103.1 fps -15%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	88.4 fps -27%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	63.1 fps -48%
Average of class Multimedia (10.4 - 121, n=21, last 2 years)	56.1 fps -54%

F1 24 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (72.5 - 106.9, n=18)	97.3 fps +29%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	94.9 (50^min, 66^P1) fps +26%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	75.4 (48^min, 54^P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	72.5 (57^min, 57^P1) fps -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	51.9 (41^min, 41^P1) fps -31%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	51.1 (41^min, 41^P1) fps -32%
Average of class Multimedia (6.75 - 75.4, n=7, last 2 years)	41.5 fps -45%

F1 25
2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (30.2 - 37.5, n=7)	34.5 fps +14%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	30.2 (17^min, 18^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (9.17 - 30.2, n=4, last 2 years)	15.6 fps -48%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	11.2 (6^min, 7^P1) fps -63%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	9.17 (4^min, 5^P1) fps -70%
2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset + DLSS Quality AA:DLSS AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (53 - 67.5, n=5)	59.7 fps +13%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	53 (32^min, 35^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (21.9 - 53, n=3, last 2 years)	34 fps -36%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	27.1 (14^min, 15^P1) fps -49%

GTA V - 2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (96.9 - 183.9, n=14)	147.5 fps +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	129.7 (4.81^min, 83.3^P1) fps +8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	121.4 (6.17^min, 83.3^P1) fps +1%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	119.8 (5.4^min, 83.3^P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	118.7 (4.11^min, 83.3^P1) fps -1%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	109.9 (5.73^min, 71.4^P1) fps -8%
Average of class Multimedia (9.23 - 119.8, n=22, last 2 years)	74.7 fps -38%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24 | F1 25 | GTA V

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (39.6 - 55.1, n=15)	51.7 fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	50.7 (42.1^min) fps +17%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	43.2 (36.5^min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	39.6 (33.6^min) fps -8%
Average of class Multimedia (15.8 - 43.2, n=5, last 2 years)	23.9 fps -45%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (62.2 - 94, n=14)	82.7 fps +21%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	79.1 fps +16%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	68.1 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	62.2 (18.9^P0.1, 53.9^P1) fps -9%
Average of class Multimedia (5.42 - 68.1, n=6, last 2 years)	33.6 fps -51%

F1 24 - 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (39.3 - 54.2, n=13)	49.6 fps +26%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	48.8 (41^min, 40^P1) fps +24%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	39.3 (31^min, 31^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 39.3, n=2, last 2 years)	28.9 fps -26%

F1 25
3840x2160 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (13.2 - 17.8, n=5)	15.6 fps +11%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	14.1 (8^min, 8^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (n=1last 2 years)	14.1 fps 0%
3840x2160 Ultra Max Preset + DLSS Quality AA:DLSS AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (25.4 - 34.1, n=4)	29.6 fps +11%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	26.7 (16^min, 17^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (n=1last 2 years)	26.7 fps 0%

GTA V - 3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (84.4 - 116.7, n=8)	104.6 fps +16%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	90.1 (18^min, 58.8^P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84.4 (11.7^min) fps -6%
Average of class Multimedia (5.03 - 90.1, n=4, last 2 years)	41.4 fps -54%

赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø106.5 (95.1-109.5)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD DLSS	QHD	4K DLSS	4K
GTA V (2015)				120.5		119.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	169.2	150.7	143.3	132.4				131.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	196.1	173.6	144.4			129.9		83.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	106.8	99.7	79.9					67
Strange Brigade (2018)	380	321	321	303		266		151.4
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)				158.7		121		68.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	132.4	127.9	120.3	112.3	100.7	90.8		43.2
F1 24 (2024)			207	107.7	108.1	75.4	66	39.3
F1 25 (2025)	188.1	176.8	168.3	49.7	53	30.2	26.7	14.1

排放与能源

噪音排放

正如在 Zephyrus G16速度更快的 ProArt P16 具有一个带两个风扇的蒸汽室。在 "性能"模式下，风扇始终以 32 dB(A) 左右的速度运转，但在日常使用中，我们建议使用 "耳语 "模式，因为散热通常会被禁用。游戏时，我们在性能模式下测得 51 分贝（A），在压力测试中测得 53 分贝（A），声音相当响亮。评测设备没有发出其他电子噪音。

Noise level

Idle		24.2 / 27.6 / 32.6 dB(A)
Load		42.6 / 53.2 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A)

	Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max 40-Core GPU, M4 Max (16 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101	Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z
Noise		-0%	-1%	11%	4%	-1%	19%
off / environment * (dB)	24.2	23.8 2%	24.1 -0%	24.1 -0%	24.1 -0%	23.5 3%	24 1%
Idle Minimum * (dB)	24.2	23.8 2%	24.1 -0%	24.1 -0%	24.1 -0%	26.7 -10%	24 1%
Idle Average * (dB)	27.6	27.2 1%	30.6 -11%	24.1 13%	24.1 13%	26.7 3%	24 13%
Idle Maximum * (dB)	32.6	31.3 4%	30.6 6%	24.1 26%	25.1 23%	31.1 5%	24 26%
Load Average * (dB)	42.6	47.6 -12%	45.5 -7%	42.2 1%	44.2 -4%	44.8 -5%	25.3 41%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)	51.2	51.3 -0%	48.2 6%	42.2 18%	52.7 -3%	53.7 -5%	33.9 34%
Load Maximum * (dB)	53.2	53.3 -0%	53.4 -0%	42.2 21%	52.7 1%	53.7 -1%	42.3 20%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在负载情况下，机身后部（键盘上方）和底部会明显发热，因此我们不建议将其放在膝盖上。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


44.8 °C	47 °C	44.8 °C
36.2 °C	38 °C	35.5 °C
32.7 °C	31 °C	32.2 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 38 °C


44.6 °C	51.6 °C	46.9 °C
40.5 °C	51.5 °C	46 °C
33.8 °C	38.3 °C	34.5 °C

Maximum: 51.6 °C
Average: 43.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


24.6 °C	24.9 °C	24.5 °C
24.2 °C	24.5 °C	24 °C
24.2 °C	23.9 °C	24.3 °C

Maximum: 24.9 °C
Average: 24.3 °C


24.9 °C	25.5 °C	25.2 °C
24.7 °C	25.4 °C	25 °C
24.5 °C	24.7 °C	24.5 °C

Maximum: 25.5 °C
Average: 24.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.8 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


43.7 °C	46.6 °C	44.7 °C
36.1 °C	38.5 °C	35.3 °C
32.4 °C	30.2 °C	31.9 °C

Maximum: 46.6 °C
Average: 37.7 °C


47.7 °C	51.3 °C	47.1 °C
41.1 °C	50.1 °C	45.6 °C
34.1 °C	38.4 °C	34.1 °C

Maximum: 51.3 °C
Average: 43.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).

	Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores), Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU
Heat		4%	-10%	10%	1%	-0%	14%
Maximum Upper Side * (°C)	47	44 6%	48.3 -3%	42.8 9%	41.8 11%	47 -0%	42.7 9%
Maximum Bottom * (°C)	51.6	44.1 15%	53.3 -3%	42.3 18%	47.9 7%	47.4 8%	43.1 16%
Idle Upper Side * (°C)	24.9	26.1 -5%	28.3 -14%	23.6 5%	26.3 -6%	26.1 -5%	21.5 14%
Idle Bottom * (°C)	25.5	25.5 -0%	30.3 -19%	23.5 8%	27.6 -8%	26.4 -4%	21.5 16%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.09 / 0.26 Watt
Idle	10.9 / 12.1 / 12.5 Watt
Load	129.3 / 233.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, SSSTC CA6-8D2048, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max (16 cores), M4 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"	Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		1%	-3%	17%	4%	4%	24%	-75%	32%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	10.9	9.4 14%	10.9 -0%	4.7 57%	8.8 19%	9.9 9%	4.6 58%	18 ?(9.4 - 38.4, n=16) -65%	5.76 ?(2.1 - 31.3, n=68, last 2 years) 47%
Idle Average * (Watt)	12.1	13.6 -12%	13.5 -12%	15.5 -28%	16.1 -33%	13.6 -12%	16.8 -39%	25.6 ?(12.1 - 45.6, n=16) -112%	10.5 ?(4.6 - 38.3, n=68, last 2 years) 13%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	12.5	15.8 -26%	13.7 -10%	15.6 -25%	16.5 -32%	14 -12%	17.1 -37%	30.2 ?(12.5 - 57.5, n=16) -142%	12.4 ?(6 - 41.6, n=68, last 2 years) 1%
Load Average * (Watt)	129.3	115.4 11%	120.2 7%	125 3%	89.3 31%	93.8 27%	76.4 41%	138 ?(88 - 190.1, n=16) -7%	68.1 ?(15.1 - 129.3, n=65, last 2 years) 47%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)	172.8	160.4 7%	177.6 -3%	107.2 38%	157.9 9%	158.3 8%	79.3 54%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)	176.6	164.5 7%	178.2 -1%	116.2 34%	160.6 9%	162.1 8%	83.4 53%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	233.9	216.7 7%	246.1 -5%	143.7 39%	177.4 24%	229 2%	138.1 41%	346 ?(217 - 431, n=16) -48%	110.5 ?(40 - 270, n=68, last 2 years) 53%

* ... smaller is better

功耗赛博朋克/压力测试

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø198.4 (176.1-234)

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.5 (8.31-21.5)

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø176.6 (174.3-178.7)

外接显示器的功耗

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø121.9 (117.7-124)

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø116.9 (116.1-117.8)

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø38.4 (35.7-65.7)

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø132.2 (117.3-162.4)

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø162.9 (150.3-174.1)

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11.2 (7.83-21.7)

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø172.8 (166.5-179.9)

电池运行时间

由于采用了新的显示屏，电池使用时间略有缩短。在 150 cd/m² 的条件下，运行时间比 ProArt P16 及其 2.8K 面板减少了近一个小时。 ProArt P16 及其 2.8K 面板相比，运行时间减少了近一个小时。而在全亮度条件下，运行时间则增加到一个多小时。激活自适应亮度后，MacBook Pro 的运行时间达到了 18 小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		8h 23min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		5h 12min

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	19.6 h +133%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max (16 cores), M4 Max 40-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	18 h +114%
Average of class Multimedia (4.37 - 20.1, n=68, last 2 years)	11.7 h +39%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 84 Wh	11.1 h +32%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh	9.2 h +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	9 h +7%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	8.4 h
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	7.9 h -6%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	7.3 h +40%
Average of class Multimedia (3.53 - 11.6, n=42, last 2 years)	6.97 h +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max M4 Max (16 cores), M4 Max 40-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	6.8 h +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	6.7 h +29%
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh	6.5 h +25%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	5.5 h +6%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	5.2 h
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 84 Wh	4.5 h -13%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Back to the verdict

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 - 10/24/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

91 / 98 → 93%

Keyboard

92%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

78 / 80 → 98%

Weight

64 / 20-74 → 81%

Battery

79 / 95 → 83%

Display

92%

Games Performance

91 / 88 → 100%

Application Performance

87 / 92 → 95%

Temperature

84%

Noise

68 / 95 → 71%

Audio

95%

Camera

32 / 75 → 43%

Average

70%

90%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
87.2%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 49.9%

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Height	Display
1. 89.7%	Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $2,817.23 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX ... 2. $2,349.00 ASUS ProArt P16 AI Creator L... 3. $2,257.66 ASUS ProArt P16 Laptop, AMD ... List Price: 4799€	2 kg	18.3 mm	16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED
2. 90%	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $5,099.00 HIDevolution [2025] ASUS ROG... 2. $11.98 KEANBOLL 3 Pack Designed for... 3. JUYOON 240W Laptop Charger C... List Price: 4799€	1.9 kg	17.4 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED
3. 87%	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $5,495.00 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... 2. $6,210.29 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... 3. $6,698.00 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... List Price: 4399€	2.1 kg	17.4 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED
4. 91.7%	Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max Apple M4 Max (16 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘ 48 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $3,561.34 Apple 2024 MacBook Pro Lapto... 2. $4,149.00 Apple MacBook Pro 16.2" with... 3. $4,393.00 Apple MacBook Pro 16.2" with... List Price: 4699€	2.1 kg	16.8 mm	16.20" 3456x2234 254 PPI Mini-LED
5. 90.4%	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $2,499.00 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16" Lapto... 2. $2,105.00 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16" Lapto... 3. $1,849.99 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16" Lapto... List Price: 2800€	1.9 kg	17.9 mm	16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED
6. 89.1%	Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $3,389.00 HIDevolution [2025] ASUS Pro... 2. $2,929.99 ASUS ProArt P16 AI Creator L... 3. $2,349.00 ASUS ProArt P16 AI Creator L... List Price: 3399€	1.8 kg	17.3 mm	16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WI Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1213
Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop	1215
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1235
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1242
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra i7-14700, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060	1243
Acemagic F3A Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M	1244
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny-30H0006AGE i9-14900, T1000	1245
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	41502
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	41542
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	41542
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	41547
MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop	41662
i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX	41663
Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M	41670
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论 - ProArt P16 是最适合创作者的 Windows 笔记本电脑

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

与配备 RTX 5070 的 ProArt P16 的区别

尺寸比较

显示屏 - 1,600 cd/m² Lumina Pro

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - RTX 5090，120 瓦

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 多重持续测试

系统性能

DPC 延迟

大容量存储器

持续读取性能：DiskSpd 循环读取，队列深度 8

图形处理器性能

游戏性能

赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表

排放与能源

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 audio analysis

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX audio analysis

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 audio analysis

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis

耗电量

功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试

外接显示器的功耗

电池运行时间

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency

功耗赛博朋克/压力测试