结论:16 英寸屏幕尺寸下 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑的性能表现
极致性能是有代价的。最明显的是,Raider 16 Max HX 比许多其他 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑都要厚重,包括已经很大的 Alienware 16X Aurora.塑料机箱的豪华感不如 Alienware 16 Area-51尽管它们的价格差不多,但缺少 G-Sync 和高级 Optimus 在这个价位上是很难被原谅的。喜欢旅行和随时随地玩游戏的用户可能会发现更轻便、更易于携带的 16 英寸解决方案更有价值,如微星 Stealth 16 或 雷蛇刀锋 16它们配备了类似的 RTX 5090 显卡,但性能水平略低。
Pros
Cons
微星 Raider 16 Max HX 于 在 2026 年的 CES 上亮相作为 Raider 系列的首款 16 英寸笔记本电脑。它也是微星首款采用 OLED 显示屏的游戏笔记本电脑,而不是常见的 IPS 或 Mini-LED 显示屏。与 Raider 18 系列一样,Raider 16 Max HX 也是微星最快的笔记本电脑之一。
我们的测试机是最高端的配置,配备了 Arrow Lake Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus CPU 和 175 WGeForce RTX 5090 GPU,售价约为 4400 美元。目前所有 SKU 均配备相同的 CPU 和 QHD+ 240 Hz OLED 光面显示屏,但可能会从GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 开始。
竞争对手包括其他高端或旗舰 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 戴尔 Alienware 16 Area-51, 华硕 Zephyrus Duo或 雷蛇刀锋 16.
更多微星评论:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
外盖是光滑的哑光金属,而底座主要是塑料。虽然并不糟糕,但表面弯曲,感觉不像 Alienware 16 Area-51 或 Razer Blade 16 等竞争机型那样坚硬。考虑到高昂的售价,我们希望机箱设计更坚固或更高级。
连接性
端口选项与 Raider 18 HX 相同,只是进行了重新安排。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
交流
网络摄像头
带红外和物理快门的 200 万像素网络摄像头均为标配。

维护
可持续性
微星没有提及 Raider 16 Max HX 在制造过程中使用的回收材料。包装不使用塑料。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有其他附件。如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备
显示屏
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 478.6 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.62 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
87.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.3% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
CCT: 6535 K
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Samsung ATNA60HU01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG AUO B160QAN02.3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Samsung ATNA60HU06-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Samsung 160HU05, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP MNG007DA5-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Samsung ATNA60HS01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | 2% | 2% | -17% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.3 | 95.5 -4% | 99.7 0% | 99.6 0% | 69.4 -30% | 99.6 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 97.2 -3% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 87.5 | 83.9 -4% | 93.5 7% | 93.9 7% | 71.9 -18% | 93.5 7% |
| Response Times | -1450% | 2% | -1% | -1641% | -62% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.28 ? | 3.59 ? -1182% | 0.28 ? -0% | 0.29 ? -4% | 6.3 ? -2150% | 0.6 ? -114% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.39 ? | 7.09 ? -1718% | 0.4 ? -3% | 0.45 ? -15% | 4.8 ? -1131% | 0.8 ? -105% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1440 ? | 1441 | 1439.8 ? | 1317 ? | ||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 35 | 32 9% | 29 17% | 23 34% | ||
| Screen | -326% | -81% | -105% | -33% | -91% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 478.6 | 472 -1% | 462.2 -3% | 380.5 -20% | 480 0% | 477.6 0% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 481 | 438 -9% | 465 -3% | 384 -20% | 456 -5% | 483 0% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 88 -10% | 97 -1% | 98 0% | 91 -7% | 95 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.4 | 0.32 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.62 | 6.07 -879% | 3.03 -389% | 3.27 -427% | 1.4 -126% | 3.11 -402% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.87 | 9.76 -240% | 5.84 -103% | 6.31 -120% | 2.5 13% | 5.99 -109% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 6.4 -814% | 0.6 14% | 1 -43% | 1.2 -71% | 0.9 -29% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.52 87% | 2.2 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 6535 99% | 7987 81% | 6452 101% | 6410 101% | 6620 98% | 6405 101% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1180 | 1500 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.25 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.79 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -593% /
-442% | -26% /
-39% | -35% /
-52% | -564% /
-321% | -50% /
-60% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.21 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.14 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1440 Hz Amplitude: 35 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1440 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1440 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7816 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 MSI Center 设置为极致性能模式和独立显卡模式。
处理器
酷睿 Ultra 9 290HX Plus 酷睿至尊 9 290HX Plus本质上是一款超频 酷睿至尊 9 275HX的超频版,缓存大小和内核数量完全相同。与微星Crosshair 16 HX相比,用户可以期待CPU性能提升约15%。 微星 Crosshair 16 HX.更有趣的是,微星的运行速度比 戴尔 Alienware 16X Aurora处理器快 10%,如下图所示。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus -1! | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus -1! | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 -1! | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP -1! | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (34761 - 40761, n=3) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (174665 - 208083, n=3) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (8352 - 9784, n=3) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (13612 - 14461, n=3) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (91215 - 108275, n=3) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (127585 - 136781, n=3) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (1967 - 2206, n=3) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (18611 - 21949, n=3) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (51134 - 55731, n=3) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (7624 - 8322, n=3) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
| Performance rating | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP -4! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 11015 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (76912 - 85698, n=3) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (84638 - 93496, n=3) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (76094 - 81688, n=3) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (105.3 - 108.4, n=3) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备与 美光 2500PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
在 Apex 模式或 Cooler Boost 模式(即最大风扇噪音模式)下运行系统是获得 CPU 和 RTX 5090 最大处理能力的唯一方法。 GeForce RTX 5090GPU 的最大处理能力,如下表Time Spy 所示。降到更安静的平衡模式后,整体性能大约会降低 10%。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 冷却器提升模式 | 26009 | 16635 | 23981 |
| 巅峰模式 | 25594 (-2%) | 16938 (-2%) | 23771 (-1%) |
| 极致性能模式 | 23905 (-8%) | 16870 (-1%) | 22497 (-6%) |
| 平衡模式 | 23572 (-9%) | 14462 (-13%) | 21536 (-10%) |
| 节能模式 | 18192 (-30%) | 13786 (-17%) | 17912 (-25%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 53257 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 77700 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 39148 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 22497 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 5710 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
移动版GeForce RTX 5090 可以说与原生 1600p 显示器搭配得更好,而不是 4K,因为桌面版的性能是原生 1600p 显示器的两倍。 桌面版的性能可提高两倍.请记住,系统必须设置为 Apex 模式或 Cooler Boost 模式,才能充分利用所宣传的 175 W TGP。
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 191.4 | 190.9 | 187.5 | 165.2 | 162.3 | 181.5 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 225 | 206 | 189.6 | 176.1 | 160 | |||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 234 | 236 | 205 | 171.3 | 96.3 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 154.8 | 138 | 112.6 | 93.8 | ||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 639 | 503 | 471 | 433 | 329 | 179.6 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 287 | 242 | 211 | 207 | 202 | 147.7 | 125.9 | 83.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 199.4 | 196.6 | 177.3 | 161.7 | 122.7 | 111.2 | 61 | 50.4 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 353 | 379 | 364 | 153.8 | 154.1 | 99.8 | 85.3 | 50.5 |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 122 | 97 | 58 | 65 | 45 | 46 | 27 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 102 | 89 | 69 | 70 | 59 | 56 | 43 |
排放量
系统噪音
风扇噪音与五个电源配置文件设置密切相关,性能从低到高依次排列:Eco、Balanced、Extreme Performance、Apex 和 Cooler Boost。在这些配置文件下运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,风扇噪音趋于稳定,分别为 36.2 dB(A)、47.5 dB(A)、51.1 dB(A)、57 dB(A) 和 60.2 dB(A)。当设置为平衡模式或更低的模式时,脉动现象通常很小。即便如此,在极致性能模式下进行游戏时,51.1 分贝(A)的噪音还是略低于竞争机型,如 联想Legion 7 16IAX10或 雷蛇刀锋 16.
Noise level
| Idle |
| 26.6 / 26.7 / 26.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36 / 60.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | -1% | -4% | -11% | 1% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.1 | 25.56 -11% | 23.1 -0% | 23.4 -1% | 25.1 -9% | 23.9 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 26.6 | 28.3 -6% | 23.4 12% | 23.8 11% | 32.2 -21% | 24 10% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 26.7 | 28.3 -6% | 25.4 5% | 23.8 11% | 32.2 -21% | 26 3% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26.9 | 28.3 -5% | 29.3 -9% | 31.4 -17% | 32.2 -20% | 29.4 -9% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 36 | 50.26 -40% | 42.6 -18% | 48.7 -35% | 38.1 -6% | 35.4 2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 51.1 | 57.8 -13% | 53.6 -5% | 51.5 -1% | 53.9 -5% | 54.6 -7% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 60.2 | 57.95 4% | 53.7 11% | 59.8 1% | 57.1 5% | 54.7 9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.8 °C / -8.7 F).
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | -17% | 2% | 8% | -14% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.2 | 44.8 -4% | 45.6 -6% | 48.2 -12% | 39.5 9% | 47 -9% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 45.6 | 43.4 5% | 47 -3% | 41 10% | 45.1 1% | 44 4% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27.8 | 31.2 -12% | 35.2 -27% | 28.2 -1% | 25.7 8% | 35.6 -28% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 29 | 28.8 1% | 37.6 -30% | 26.2 10% | 25.5 12% | 35.2 -21% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力后的大约一分钟内,CPU 的主频将升至 4.5 GHz,功耗为 215 W,温度为 105 C。然后会降至 3.9 GHz 和 ~152 W,以保持 96 C 的较易管理的核心温度。 Alienware 16 Area-51与微星CPU完全相同的Alienware 16 Area-51在类似条件下也会稳定在90摄氏度左右,这表明酷睿Ultra 9 290HX Plus是市场上运行温度最高的移动CPU之一。
请注意,正如下面的截图和表格所示,在切换到更快的电源配置文件时,GPU 的平均时钟速率会稳步上升。
| 平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 47 | 39 |
| Prime95 压力 | 3.9 | -- | 96 | 56 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.7 - 3.9 | ~1600 | 96 | 75 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力(安静模式) | 1.4 | 1440 | 81 | 73 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力(平衡模式) | 1.7 | 2062 | 79 | 73 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力(极限性能模式) | 1.9 | 2100 | 82 | 73 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力(Apex 模式) | 2.3 | 2175 | 96 | 76 |
| 赛博朋克2077压力(冷却提升模式) | 2.2 | 2295 | 87 | 72 |
MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
考虑到所涉及的硬件,功耗可想而知是非常高的。在极致性能模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》,其功耗大约比 雷蛇刀锋 16高出大约 28%,尽管后者配备了相同的 RTX 5090 GPU。这一巨大差异可归因于 Arrow Lake-HX CPU 与速度更慢但效率更高的 Panther Lake-H 系列 CPU 相比。
在使用大型(约 18.8 x 8.8 x 3.4 厘米)400 W AC 适配器时,我们能够记录到 405 W 的临时最大功耗。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Lexar NM790 2TB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, , OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -53% | 8% | 19% | 38% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 7.2 | 26.2 -264% | 4.4 39% | 6.9 4% | 4.6 36% | 9.4 -31% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 12 | 33.8 -182% | 22.3 -86% | 8.1 32% | 9.8 18% | 10.6 12% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 32.8 | 34 -4% | 30.4 7% | 31 5% | 10.2 69% | 36.4 -11% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 133 | 112 16% | 110.7 17% | 131.6 1% | 76.1 43% | 107.7 19% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 275 | 220 20% | 216 21% | 172.1 37% | 198.1 28% | 187.5 32% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 276 | 224 19% | 216 22% | 198.3 28% | 198.9 28% | 188 32% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 404.5 | 315 22% | 251.3 38% | 300.1 26% | 235.2 42% | 247 39% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
运行时间尚可,但比许多上一代机型要短,部分原因是从 IPS 转向 OLED。
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 91.8 Wh | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 96 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 84 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 41% | 48% | -6% | 65% | -41% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 7.9 | 11.1 41% | 11.7 48% | 7.4 -6% | 13 65% | 4.7 -41% |
| H.264 (h) | 14.2 |
笔记本检查评级
Raider 16 Max HX 比许多其他 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑更重、更大,但却能从 CPU 和 GPU 中榨取更多性能。
MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ
- 06/09/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4200 USD | 2.7 kg | 28.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2500 EUR | 2.5 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $4,349.99 Razer Blade 16 (2025) Gaming... 2. $3,999.99 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... List Price: 4900 USD | 2.1 kg | 17.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 3000 USD | 2.6 kg | 23.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2199€ | 2.2 kg | 25.7 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX10 Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1650 USD | 2 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.






















































































