结论令人瞠目的动力和隐患
微星 Titan 18 HX AI 在熟悉的镁铝合金机箱中展示了英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 285HX 和英伟达 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU。今年的主要变化包括双 Thunderbolt 5 端口、Gen5 SSD 散热器和一个额外的 NVMe 插槽。
酷睿 Ultra 9 285HX 的性能与同类笔记本电脑的酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 不相上下，但并不总是超越后者。RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU 的原生渲染性能勉强超过 RTX 4090，不过多帧生成功能可在最大设置下实现更流畅的游戏。
微星的蒸气室散热可以维持 261 W 的综合功耗，但代价是会产生大量热量和噪音。
鲜艳的 4K 120 Hz 迷你 LED 显示屏非常适合 HDR，但缺乏任何形式的自适应同步功能--在我们看来，这是一个巨大的缺失。dGPU 模式下的待机功耗几乎与 U 系列 CPU 的 TDP 相同，需要立即解决。
其他令人失望的地方还包括缺乏高级擎天柱、SD 读卡器速度慢、网络摄像头效果一般，以及触感不佳的触摸板。赛睿（SteelSeries）机械键盘将 Cherry MX 开关限制在打字区域，感觉像是一种不必要的成本削减措施。
对于那些有 6000 多美元闲置资金购买台式机替代品的人来说，微星 Titan 18 HX AI 尽管有一些明显的取舍，但却能提供毫不妥协的动力。对于其他人来说，更均衡的替代品会更好。
Pros
+ 优质镁铝合金结构
+ 双雷电 5 端口和四个 NVMe 插槽
+ 绝佳的打字体验
+ 色彩鲜艳的 4K 120 Hz 迷你 LED 显示屏，带高 PWM
+ 260 瓦 CPU 和 GPU 综合功率
+ 无节流性能
Cons
- 慢速 SD 读卡器
- 没有全机械键盘和令人失望的触觉触摸板
- 没有 G-Sync 或自适应同步功能
- 没有高级擎天柱
- 高热量和高噪音
- dGPU 模式下待机功耗高
价格和供应情况
$5,799.99
MSI Titan 18 HX AI 18" 120Hz MiniLED UHD+ Gaming Laptop: Intel Ultra 9-285HX, NVIDIA Geforce RTX 5090, 64GB DDR5, 6TB NVMe SSD, Thunderbolt 5, Wi-Fi 7, Win 11 Pro: Black A2XWJG-614US
微星的年度泰坦新品继续展示英特尔和 Nvidia 的旗舰芯片。
在保持 Titan 18 HX A14VIG的外观，今年的 Titan 18 HX AI 首次采用了 英特尔箭湖-HX 酷睿至尊 9 285HX搭配 175 W Nvidia BlackwellGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU.
我们的设备还配备了 64 GB DDR5-6400 内存、6 TB NVMe SSD 超大存储空间和 SteelSeries Cherry MX Ultra Low Profile 机械键盘。
这样的配置将为你带来 6600 美元的预算。
在这篇评测中，我们将看到微星 Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG 是否真的值得让你的钱包承受如此巨大的压力。
规格
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.5 GHz, 220 W PL2 / Short Burst, 200 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, 175 W TDP, GDDR7, Game Ready Driver 576.40, MSHybrid, MUX
Memory
64 GB
, DDR5-6400, Dual-channel, Timings: 52-51-51-102
Display
18.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2160 pixel 245 PPI, AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, Mini-LED, VESA DisplayHDR 1000-certified, glossy: no, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)
Storage
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0), 6000 GB
, 5460 GB free
Weight
3.6 kg, Power Supply: 860 g
Price
6600 USD
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
底盘保留了前代车型的优质设计
底盘与去年的 Titan 18 HX A14VIG 保持一致。同样采用镁铝合金打造，表面为酷睿黑，机身后部延伸部分为银色，配以蓝色点缀。RGB 灯光仅限于显示屏盖上的微星徽标。
触觉触摸板是一个突出的设计元素，它与横跨整个笔记本电脑长度的玻璃掌托无缝集成。虽然有助于营造简洁的美感，但这种玻璃表面却很容易沾染指纹。
尽管显示屏很重，但只需一根手指就能打开，显示屏的铰链质量很高。即使在刻意施加压力的情况下，屏幕和键盘板也几乎没有弯曲。
连接性泰坦 18 升级为雷电 5
端口的选择和位置大体保持不变，但值得注意的是，这次迭代升级到了 Thunderbolt 5 端口。
USB 端口沿机身两侧分布，间距适中，没有任何连接障碍。
SD 读卡器
与上一代产品相比，Titan 18 HX AI 内置的 SD Express 读卡器在平均读取速度和连续读取速度方面没有明显改善。
读卡器的性能与 Aorus Master 18和 申克 XMG Neo 16 E25.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 204, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
交流
与 5 GHz 相比，6 GHz 6E 频段的性能略有提升，使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器进行测试时，发射和接收的平均速度和最大速度都略有提高。
5 GHz 和 6 GHz 6E 频段的传输吞吐量表现不一致，波动明显。
Networking: iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | iperf3 receive AXE11000 | iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
| Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW (665 - 1814, n=8) | |
| Average of class Gaming (469 - 1862, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (680 - 1741, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW (777 - 1696, n=8) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (648 - 2355, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW (648 - 2355, n=7) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG (iperf 3.1.3) | |
| Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW (1045 - 1723, n=7) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1529 (809-1691)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1723 (1677-1745)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1464 (789-1631)
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1342 (1027-1465)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1667 (869-1735)
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1735 (1712-1765)
网络摄像头
遗憾的是，全高清网络摄像头的图像质量并不尽如人意。它只能满足基本的视频会议需求，但即使在环境光线良好的情况下，图像也缺乏焦点和清晰度。
提供的物理快门可增加私密性。
9.7 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
安全
除了现在普遍使用的 TPM 2.0 芯片外，Titan 18 HX AI 还配备了 Windows Hello 面部识别功能，用于生物识别登录。
配件和保修
除了常见的文件和 400 W 电源适配器外，收件箱中的配件还包括微星 M18 无线/有线游戏鼠标和微星 USB 3.2 Type-A/Type-C 256 GB OTG 硬盘。
根据购买地区的不同，微星提供一年或两年的标准保修服务。
维护
访问 Titan 18 HX AI 繁忙的内部结构非常简单--只需拧下 12 颗等长的飞利浦螺丝，就能轻松撬开背板。
由于多了一个 PCIe Gen4 NVMe M.2 插槽（共有 3x PCIe Gen4 和 1x PCIe Gen5 插槽），内部布局与去年的 Titan 18 略有不同。Gen5 SSD 采用专用热管。
2x CSODIMM（从上一代的 4 个减少到 4 个）被封闭在一个金属屏蔽内，并用粘合剂和夹子固定，这使得其拆卸有些麻烦。
英特尔杀手 Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x WLAN 模块可以更换，电池也可以在需要时拧下。
可持续性
MSI 表示，其目标是到 2050 年实现到 2050 年实现净零排放。Titan 18 HX AI 采用可回收的纸板包装，尽量少用塑料。该笔记本电脑支持 ErP，符合能源之星和 RoHS 标准。
输入设备：Cherry MX 机械键盘，配上一个复杂的触觉触摸板
键盘
赛睿（SteelSeries）机械键盘采用 Cherry MX Ultra-Low Profile 开关，具有较深的键程和令人满意的触感，非常适合打字和游戏。不过，右侧短小的 Shift 键可能需要一些时间来适应，而且没有独立的 Home 键和 End 键。
四段式背光有助于实现绚丽的 RGB 照明，可通过 SteelSeries GG 应用程序进行自定义。按下 Fn 键时，辅助功能键会亮起。
与我们在 Alienware m18 R1不同的是，并非所有按键都采用了 Cherry MX 技术--功能行、数字键盘、方向键和空格键右侧的按键都采用了薄膜技术。
触摸板
13 厘米 x 8.5 厘米的 RGB 发光触控板与掌托齐平。虽然美观，但实用性不强，而且在没有照明的情况下，要找到它是个难题。
触觉并不特别令人信服，也没有软件控制来调整反馈。
单击和右键有时可能无法注册，而多点触控拖放很快就会让人感觉有点麻烦。WindowsPrecision 手势完全支持。
显示屏明亮的 4K 120 Hz 迷你 LED 显示屏，可与 OLED 显示屏媲美，但没有 G-Sync 功能
Titan 18 HX AI 继续采用与去年型号相同的友达微型 LED 面板，因此显示特性基本保持相似。
在 SDR 模式下，插电后显示屏的平均亮度可达 680 尼特，峰值亮度为 717 尼特。使用电池时，亮度降至 456 尼特，仍处于大多数笔记本电脑提供的典型 SDR 峰值范围内。
Mini-LED 面板具有出色的亮度均匀性和近乎无限的对比度，以及 OLED 质量的黑色。
该显示屏通过了 VESA DisplayHDR 1000 认证--我们在 HDR 模式下测得的亮度为 1,153 尼特，窗口为 10%。没有观察到明显的背光出血现象，但鼠标指针在全黑的屏幕上有微弱的光晕。
遗憾的是，Titan 18 的显示屏缺乏自适应同步或 Nvidia G-Sync，这对于此类笔记本电脑来说是一个重大疏忽。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3
Maximum: 717 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 679.6 cd/m² Minimum: 137 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 456 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85, calibrated: 2.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
90.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.03
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 18", 120 Hz | Aorus Master 18 AM8H NE180QDM-NM1 (BOE0C58), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 BOEhydis NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -2% | -3% | -3% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.7 | 99.9 0% | 99 -1% | 97.1 -3% | 96.1 -4% | 98.1 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.8 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 90.4 | 87.7 -3% | 87.2 -4% | 84.7 -6% | 85 -6% | 86.2 -5% |
| Response Times | -47% | -18% | 44% | 69% | -222% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8.8 ? | 16.4 ? -86% | 7.4 ? 16% | 5.6 ? 36% | 0.2 ? 98% | 8.6 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 15 ? | 8.1 ? 46% | 10.4 ? 31% | 7.3 ? 51% | 0.25 ? 98% | 81.8 ? -445% |
| PWM Frequency | 15430 ? | 1398 ? | 20610 ? | 960 ? | 2592 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * | 50 | 100 -100% | 100 -100% | 44 12% | ||
| Screen | 15% | 37% | -5% | 18% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 704 | 438 -38% | 764 9% | 478 -32% | 391 -44% | 467.5 -34% |
| Brightness | 680 | 451 -34% | 747 10% | 456 -33% | 393 -42% | 459 -32% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 93 6% | 89 1% | 98 11% | 90 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.13 | 0.1 | 0.4 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.11 | 1.25 70% | 1.2 71% | 3.94 4% | 1.2 71% | 3.77 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.43 | 4.93 23% | 2.8 56% | 8.6 -34% | 3.2 50% | 6.12 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.5 | 0.75 70% | 2.94 -18% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 1.7 65% | 1.5 69% | 5.5 -12% | 1.8 63% | 3.2 35% |
| Gamma | 2.03 108% | 2.173 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.212 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 6331 103% | 6518 100% | 6556 99% | 7059 92% | 6493 100% | 6478 100% |
| Contrast | 3369 | 7640 | 1195 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-5% | 6% /
14% | 12% /
4% | 28% /
26% | -76% /
-40% |
* ... smaller is better
微型 LED 面板完全覆盖了 sRGB、Display P3 色彩空间和 90% 的 Adobe RGB 色域。这不仅带来了绝佳的观看体验，还有利于需要扩展色彩空间的照片和视频编辑工作流程。
我们使用 X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 分光光度计和 Portrait Displays 的 Calman Ultimate 软件进行校准，结果显示，灰度平均 DeltaE 2000 值从 4.9 降至 1.4，ColorChecker 从 4.11 降至 2.5。
我们的校准 ICC 文件可从上面的链接下载。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise |   |
| ↘ 6.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise |   |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). | ||
由于微型 LED 面板的高背景 PWM 特性，我们必须手动估算响应时间。
面板默认使用过驱动。禁用过驱动后，50% 灰到 80% 灰的响应时间从 8.8 毫秒增加到 12.6 毫秒。
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 15430 Hz Amplitude: 50 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 15430 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 15430 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8429 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在所有测试的亮度级别中，检测到的 PWM 频率都保持在 15.42 kHz 的高水平。
如需了解更多信息，请参阅我们的入门指南"为什么 PWM 如此令人头疼".我们的 PWM 排名表列出了所有评测设备的 PWM 测量值。
明亮的显示屏适合在户外清晰观看。可视角度相当稳定，仅在极端情况下亮度略有下降。
性能旗舰版酷睿至尊 9 285HX 与酷睿至尊 9 275HX 几乎没有区别
微星提供两种型号的 Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG。两者均提供相同的 英特尔酷睿至尊9 285HX和 英伟达GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑组合，区别仅在于配置的最大内存（48 GBx2 或 32 GBx2）。
测试条件
微星中心为配置 Titan 18 HX AI 的性能提供了一个集中界面。我们在初始化软件时遇到了一些小问题，但卸载和重新安装几次后就解决了。
我们使用极致性能模式进行所有基准测试，使用 ECO-Silent 模式进行电池测试。
| 性能模式 | PL1 (PBP) / Tau | PL2 (MTP) / Tau | GPU TGP | Cinebench R15 Multi score | Cinebench R15 Multi score (30 loops) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECO-Silent | 15 W / 128 s | 15 W / 2.44 ms | 96 W | 660 (-88.5%) | 683 (-87.97%) |
| 微星人工智能引擎 | 140 瓦 / 128 秒 | 220 瓦 / 2.44 毫秒 | 150 瓦 | 5744 (-0.27%) | 5600 (-1.37%) |
| 平衡 | 140 瓦 / 128 秒 | 220 瓦 / 2.44 毫秒 | 150 瓦 | 5726 (-0.59%) | 5605 (-1.28%) |
| 极高性能 | 200 瓦 / 128 秒 | 220 瓦 / 2.44 毫秒 | 175 瓦 | 5760 (100%) | 5678 (100%) |
| 电池供电 | 55 W / 128 s | 55 W / 2.44 ms | 24 W | 1648 (-71%) | 1404 (-75%) |
处理器
Core Ultra 9 285HX 与 Core Ultra 9 275HX 几乎完全相同。 酷睿至尊 9 275HX除了 P 核心时钟频率高出 100 MHz。
在单核 Cinebench 和 Geekbench 测试中，Titan 18 HX AI 落后于搭载 Core Ultra 9 275HX 的笔记本电脑，如 申克 XMG Neo 16 E25和 华硕 ROG Strix Scar 18虽然在多核性能方面有所补偿。
基于 Arrow Lake-HX 的 Titan 18 HX AI 与去年基于 英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX与去年基于英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX 的 XMG Neo 16 A25's AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D的累计 CPU 性能。
在 Cinebench R15 多核循环测试中，CPU 没有出现节流现象，只是在第 8 次循环测试中略有下降。
使用电池时，酷睿至尊 9 285HX 的 PL1=PL2 功耗为 55 W。这导致 Cinebench R23 多核性能下降了 70.8%，而单核性能则下降了 13.8%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX: Ø6132 (6018.66-6231.5)
Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø4952 (4898.36-5043.5)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5942 (5879.76-6059.69)
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø4232 (4107.2-4852.6)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø6151 (6038.65-6270.58)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5832 (5537.87-5930.32)
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3489 (3470.41-3505.08)
MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4753 (4700.35-4782.4)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D: Ø5974 (5932.08-6044.12)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=139, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=134, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=134, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62274, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
请参阅我们的 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 285HX页面，了解更多信息和性能比较。
系统性能
Titan 18 HX AI 在处理日常生产任务时几乎不费吹灰之力。我们发现，与去年的 Titan 18 HX 相比，总体得分提高了 18%。
Performance Rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance Rating | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 -4! | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 103347, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Average of class Gaming (235 - 480, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=111, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5564 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3012 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 8795 points | |
Help | ||
DPC 延迟
在我们的常规延迟测量中，Titan 18 HX AI 显示了高达 1398.5 μs 的中断到进程延迟。
虽然比同类产品要好很多，但在实时音频和视频工作流程中仍有可能出现问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
* ... smaller is better
在我们的 DPC 延迟排名表.
存储设备
我们的设备共安装了三块配置为 RAID 0 的 NVMe SSD（1x PCIe Gen5 和 2x PCIe Gen4）。这样，在队列深度为 8 的情况下，连续读取速度可高达 15 GB/s。
不过，在 4K 读写和较低队列深度的连续测试中，阵列的性能急剧下降。
我们的设备仍有空间容纳另一块 PCIe Gen4 SSD，但内部无法安装 2.5 英寸 SATA 硬盘。
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
11612 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
6547 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
685.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
492.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
4586 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
4490 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
65.17 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
108.7 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
481.8 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
1105.8 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø14939 (13310.85-15157.68)
请参阅我们专门的 固态硬盘基准部分，了解更多存储性能比较。
图形处理器性能
......（英文 英伟达GeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU在极限性能配置文件中，Titan 18 HX AI 的运行功耗为 175 W。
不过，与 175 W 的 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑 GPU在 3DMark 测试中几乎看不出来。
不支持高级优化。 Time Spy 在电池供电情况下，图形分数大幅下降 78.8%。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 50365 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 298917 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 80657 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 39279 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 30016 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 22155 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 6163 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 26098 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 26099 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9 - 18, n=12) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=138, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 37, n=10) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG | |
| Aorus Master 18 AM8H | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (123 - 259, n=12) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Core Ultra 9 285HX 和 RTX 5090 Laptop GPU 的组合使 Titan 18 HX AI 在游戏方面领先于竞争对手，但与搭载 Ryzen 9955HX3D 的 XMG Neo 16 A25 相比仍有差距。
与去年的 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑 GPU 版本相比，在 1080p 超高清下的整体提升幅度仅为 11%。
RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU 在现代 AAA 级游戏中的原生 4K Ultra 下很难达到 60 fps。
启用全光线追踪或路径追踪将不可避免地需要使用 DLSS4、光线重构和多帧生成（MFG）等升级技术，以达到与显示器 120 Hz 刷新率相匹配的高帧率。
Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Assassin's Creed Shadows | Black Myth: Wukong | Indiana Jones and the Great Circle | Alan Wake 2 | F1 24 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3
| Black Myth: Wukong | |
| 2560x1440 cinematic TSR 100 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (44 - 48, n=3) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 48, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| 3840x2160 cinematic TSR 100 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (27 - 33, n=3) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 33, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (76 - 82, n=3) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (35 - 82, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| 3840x2160 cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (44 - 45, n=2) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.1 - 45, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle | |
| 2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (66.1 - 115.9, n=13) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (66.1 - 115.9, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| 3840x2160 Very Ultra Preset | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (48.2 - 70.8, n=10) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (43.1 - 68.6, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (72.9 - 180, n=5) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (20.2 - 84.2, n=10, last 2 years) | |
赛博朋克 2077 1080p 超高 FPS 图表
在长时间运行《赛博朋克2077》的过程中，没有出现重大的节流问题。 赛博朋克 2077幻影自由在 1080p 超高画质下长时间运行时，没有出现严重的节流问题，这表明 GPU 冷却系统非常强劲。
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø172.1 (162.8-176.9)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD FSR | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K FSR | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 185.2 | 184.5 | 180.4 | 162.4 | 160.1 | 179.9 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 229 | 207 | 198.3 | 184.7 | ||||||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 234 | 236 | 212 | 179.5 | 106.4 | |||||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 108.9 | 148.3 | 120.9 | |||||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 617 | 482 | 473 | 437 | 339 | 164.2 | ||||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 225.3 | 158.4 | 135.5 | 84.1 | ||||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 178.7 | 177.3 | 166.4 | 157.5 | 128.1 | 115.6 | 79.5 | 46.2 | 53.1 | |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 125.2 | 84.5 | 45.9 | |||||||
| F1 24 (2024) | 343 | 369 | 357 | 157.8 | 105 | 80.8 | 77.7 | 51.3 | ||
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 63 | 70 | 49 | 48 | 33 | |||||
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 133.9 | 105.9 | 66.4 | |||||||
| Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 88.9 | 73.3 | 46.8 | |||||||
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 62 | 54 | 59 | 41 | ||||||
| F1 25 (2025) | 279 | 268 | 252 | 58.8 | 64 | 35.8 | 32.2 | 16.7 |
更多信息，请访问我们的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU页面。
此外，请参阅我们的 全面分析RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU 的全面分析，了解更多制造商和内容创作性能数据。
排放物：尽管有蒸汽室，但噪音和表面温度仍然很高
系统噪音
由于内部功能强大，风扇噪音偏高也是可以理解的。
ECO-Silent 模式可将噪音水平保持在 40 分贝（A）以下，因此非常适合在安静环境中执行要求较低的任务。
我们建议在使用 "极致性能 "模式时使用耳机，因为在高负载和游戏过程中，风扇噪音可达近 60 分贝（A）。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 27.68 / 27.68 / 31.54 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 44 / 58.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.56 dB(A) | ||
| 性能模式 (PL1 / PL2 / GPU TGP) | 空闲 dB(A) | 负载平均 dB(A) | 负载最大 dB(A) | 赛博朋克 2077 1080p 超强 dB(A) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECO-Silent (15 / 15 / 96 W) | 27.68 | 37.60 | 37.81 | 37.31 / 50 fps |
| 平衡（140 / 220 / 150 瓦） | 27.68 | 43.71 | 51.90 | 52.61 / 160 帧/秒 |
| 极限性能（200 / 220 / 175 瓦） | 31.54 | 44 | 58.87 | 58.70 / 173 帧/秒 |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Aorus Master 18 AM8H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | 3% | 6% | -9% | 5% | 10% | |
| off / environment * | 25.56 | 25 2% | 23.3 9% | 24.1 6% | 25 2% | 24.1 6% | 22.8 11% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27.68 | 26 6% | 29.8 -8% | 25.6 8% | 25 10% | 24.1 13% | 23.8 14% |
| Idle Average * | 27.68 | 29 -5% | 29.8 -8% | 25.6 8% | 39 -41% | 30.6 -11% | 23.8 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.54 | 34 -8% | 29.8 6% | 25.6 19% | 42 -33% | 30.6 3% | 28 11% |
| Load Average * | 44 | 50 -14% | 42.9 2% | 47.2 -7% | 52 -18% | 45.5 -3% | 38 14% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 58.7 | 52 11% | 53.7 9% | 55.5 5% | 53 10% | 48.2 18% | |
| Load Maximum * | 58.9 | 53 10% | 53.7 9% | 55.5 6% | 55 7% | 53.4 9% | 62.8 -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 57.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Titan 18 HX AI 的蒸气室可使硬件在不节流的情况下运行，但这是以在大量使用时较高的表面温度为代价的。
在 Prime95 就地大型 FFT 和 FurMark（1,280x720，无 AA）综合负载下，我们记录到机箱底部的最高温度为 53.6 °C。在压力测试期间，触摸板和掌托保持相对低温。
Titan 18 HX AI 的便携性不足以在膝上连续使用。不过，我们不建议在运行高强度任务时将设备放在膝上。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.6 °C / -10.1 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.6 °C / -10.1 F).
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | 17% | 16% | 13% | 13% | 17% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48.2 | 50 -4% | 45.6 5% | 46.3 4% | 47 2% | 48.3 -0% | 37.8 22% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53.6 | 46 14% | 46 14% | 44.3 17% | 48 10% | 53.3 1% | 37.6 30% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 37.2 | 36 3% | 28.9 22% | 30 19% | 29 22% | 28.3 24% | 34.8 6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 40.4 | 35 13% | 29.2 28% | 31.1 23% | 33 18% | 30.3 25% | 36 11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
使用 Prime95 对 Titan 18 HX AI 进行压力测试时，Core Ultra 9 285HX 在 221W 的功耗条件下短暂达到 4.29 GHz，随后在 174W 的功耗条件下稳定在 3.97 GHz。
在添加 FurMark 时，笔记本电脑优先考虑图形性能，将 CPU 的频率节流至 3.2 GHz/91W，而 RTX 5090 则在 170W TGP 下保持 1.8 GHz 的频率。
在使用 1080p Ultra 的《赛博朋克 2077》进行的更真实的压力测试中，RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU 可维持更高的 2.2 GHz 时钟，而平均功耗为 169 W。Core Ultra 9 285HX 现在的平均运行频率为 4.2 GHz，而功耗仅为 91 W。
| 压力测试 | CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度 (°C) |
| 系统空闲 | 2.19 | 180 | 52 | 47 |
| Prime95 | 3.95 | 180 | 91 | 54.5 |
| Prime95 + FurMark | 3.07 | 1,860 | 83 | 74.2 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 1080p Ultra | 4.44 | 2.21 | 81 | 72.6 |
发言人
Titan 18 HX AI 采用四扬声器系统，由两个扬声器和两个低音扬声器组成。扬声器的声压级 (SPL) 为 87.4 db(A)，可产生足够响亮的声音，且无明显失真。
低音扬声器的低频响应不是很好，但与许多笔记本电脑扬声器不同，音频听起来并不刺耳。中音和高音还原得相当好。
通过 3.5 毫米组合音频插孔和蓝牙 5.4，可以连接外置扬声器或耳机，以获得更好的音质。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理：耗电量大，电池续航能力差
耗电量
Core Ultra 9 285HX 和 175 W RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 GPU 的组合，再加上明亮的 4K 120 Hz mini-LED，使 Titan 18 HX AI 成为一个耗能大户。
我们使用 MSHybrid 模式记录功耗测量结果，因为 dGPU MUX 在待机模式下的平均功耗高达 21.6 W。
随附的 400 瓦适配器为满足 Titan 18 HX AI 在高强度工作负载下的峰值功耗需求提供了充足的余量。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.33 / 1.95 Watt |
| Idle | 19.01 / 30.92 / 33.84 Watt |
| Load |
105.4 / 354 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 18" | Aorus Master 18 AM8H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18" | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16" | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18" | Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -14% | -8% | 13% | 30% | 38% | -13% | 5% | 21% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 19.01 | 29 -53% | 11.4 40% | 13.2 31% | 7.9 58% | 10.9 43% | 13.2 31% | 15.9 ? 16% | 14.2 ? 25% |
| Idle Average * | 30.92 | 33 -7% | 39.2 -27% | 16.8 46% | 11.5 63% | 13.5 56% | 25.4 18% | 24.5 ? 21% | 20.2 ? 35% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.84 | 48 -42% | 40.2 -19% | 17.1 49% | 16.6 51% | 13.7 60% | 53.5 -58% | 29.1 ? 14% | 27.3 ? 19% |
| Load Average * | 105.4 | 141 -34% | 161.2 -53% | 164.2 -56% | 130 -23% | 120.2 -14% | 151.4 -44% | 134.6 ? -28% | 105.7 ? -0% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 343 | 283 17% | 303 12% | 284 17% | 253 26% | 178.2 48% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 330 | 283 14% | 295 11% | 282 15% | 245 26% | 177.6 46% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 354 | 340 4% | 430.9 -22% | 392.8 -11% | 330 7% | 246.1 30% | 395.2 -12% | 341 ? 4% | 256 ? 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 336 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø105.4 (62.5-151)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø354 (292-424)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø343 (315-356)
Power consumption: External monitor
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø268 (260-336)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø289 (273-300)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Cinebench R20 Single (external Monitor): Ø66.3 (59.1-136.3)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Cinebench R20 Multi (external Monitor): Ø276 (247-299)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø59.7 (55.6-108.1)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø278 (241-297)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Cinebench 2024 Single Power (external Monitor): Ø65 (58.3-114.2)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Cinebench 2024 Multi Power (external Monitor): Ø274 (247-302)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø230 (217-238)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø30.7 (23.9-38.3)
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø330 (316-342)
电池寿命
尽管配备了 99 Whr 电池，并在 MSHybrid 模式的 ECO-Silent 预设值下以 60 Hz 刷新率运行，Titan 18 HX AI 在 150 尼特亮度下播放 1080p H.264 视频时也只能勉强维持 3 小时。
在相同亮度下进行 Wi-Fi 浏览时，运行时间将缩短至 4.5 小时。
其他搭载酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 处理器的笔记本电脑的电池运行时间要长得多。
笔记本电脑从零电量到充满电大约需要两个小时。两个 Thunderbolt 5 端口也可用于充电，但充电速度明显较慢。
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh | Aorus Master 18 AM8H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | MSI Titan 18 HX A14VIG i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 19% | 15% | 36% | 84% | 103% | -12% | 65% | |
| H.264 | 180 | 347 93% | 592 229% | 457 ? 154% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 259 | 296 14% | 332 28% | 352 36% | 476 84% | 475 83% | 252 -3% | 384 ? 48% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 73 | 44 -40% | 71 -3% | |||||
| Load | 90 | 112 24% | 70 -22% | 72 -20% | 84.8 ? -6% | |||
| Reader / Idle | 348 | 353 | 570 ? |
Notebookcheck对微星Titan 18 HX AI的印象
虽然微星 Titan 18 HX AI 总体上有了一些明显的改进，但还不值得立即花上 6600 美元，因为肯定还有需要改进的地方。
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG
- 06/02/2025 v8
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Potential competitors in comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.1%  | MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 6000 GB SSD | Amazon: $5,799.99 List Price: 6600 USD | 3.6 kg | 32.05 mm | 18.00" 3840x2160 245 PPI Mini-LED |
2. 86.8%  | Aorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $54.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... 2. $54.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... 3. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Touch Pad Film ... List Price: 5000 EUR | 3.4 kg | 31 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED |
3. 88%  | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $4,869.00 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... 2. $3,399.99 ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025... 3. $5,799.99 Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025... List Price: 5799€ | 3.3 kg | 32 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI Mini-LED |
4. 82.5%  | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, SSD | List Price: 3700 EUR | 3.6 kg | 30.4 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
5. 90%  | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $4,499.99 ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025... 2. $2,899.99 ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Ga... 3. $1,840.28 Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 ... List Price: 4450€ | 2.9 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI Mini-LED |
6. 89.4%  | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB NVMe | List Price: 4480€ | 2.9 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI Mini-LED |
7. 88.4%  | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $3,299.99 ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 (2025... 2. $4,299.99 ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 16 (2025... 3. $3,399.99 ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025... List Price: 4999€ | 2.8 kg | 30.8 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI Mini-LED |
8. 87%  | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $4,199.99 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... 2. $5,495.00 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... List Price: 4399€ | 2.1 kg | 17.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
