惠普 Omen Max 16 笔记本电脑评测：速度超快，但温度有点高

Name: HP Omen Max 16 ah000
Brand: HP

最大统计数据。

Omen Max 16 配备了最新的英特尔 Arrow Lake 处理器和 Nvidia Maxwell 显卡，最高可达 Core Ultra 9 275HX 和GeForce RTX 5090。不过，CPU 尤其需要更强的冷却解决方案。
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 05/05/2025 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...
Blackwell RTX 5000 Intel Gaming Geforce Arrow Lake

结论 - 最快的 CPU 之一

考虑到体积，Omen Max 16 的性能非常强大。它配备了与竞争对手联想Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 相同的 Core Ultra 9 275HX CPU 和 175 WGeForce RTX 5090 GPU，同时重量更轻、体积更小。该处理器尤其使惠普的性能超过了 Razer Blade 16 2025 或华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 等流行的 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，因为它们分别仅限于 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 和 Core Ultra 9 285H。如果用户可以利用超快的酷睿 HX 处理器来处理工作负载，可能会发现 Omen Max 16 值得一试，尤其是它配备了与竞争对手类似的 OLED 面板和可以说更舒适的键盘。

Test device courtesy of HP

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

尽管 Arrow Lake HX CPU 的速度可能很快，但对于 Omen Max 16 来说，可能还是太快了。在负载情况下或游戏时，核心温度远远超过 90 C，而时钟频率却始终慢于上述Legion Pro 7i 16 上运行的相同处理器。虽然差距不大，但对性能要求极高的发烧友可能会因此更青睐联想或其他CPU温度更低但速度更慢的机型。

Pros

+ 配备 G-Sync 技术的 240 Hz 高品质 OLED 面板

+ 易于访问的内存和固态硬盘插槽

+ 高达 175 瓦的 TGP 目标

+ 舒适的键盘

+ 支持 PCIe5 固态硬盘

Cons

- 游戏时 CPU 温度很高

- 酷睿至尊 9 275HX 可以更快

- 扬声器音量可以更大

- 不支持 HDR1000

- 体积较重

价格和供应情况

惠普现已开始发售Omen Max 16，基本 RTX 5070 Ti 配置的起价为 2500 美元，我们评测的 RTX 5090 配置的起价为 4000 美元。

$3,299.00

HP OMEN MAX 16-inch Gaming Laptop, Windows 11, Intel Core Ultra 9, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, WQXGA, Shadow Black

结论 - 最快的 CPU 之一
规格
箱子 - 密集包装
连接性
输入设备 - 更熟悉、更明亮
显示屏 - 240 Hz OLED，带 G-Sync 功能
性能 - 负载情况下处理器温度很高
排放量
能源管理--要求极高的处理器
笔记本检查评级
Potential Competitors in Comparison

Omen Max 16 设计为 "普通 "Omen 16 的更大、更重、更快版本。 "普通 "预兆 16.它搭载了市场上速度最快的处理器，包括箭湖酷睿9 275HX CPU 和 175 W BlackwellGeForce RTX 5090 GPU，而许多较薄的竞争对手 "仅 "提供 H 系列处理器和较低的 TGP GPU。Omen Max 16 的目标是在性能方面尽量少走弯路--至少在理论上是这样。

该机型的较少 SKU 从配备酷睿至尊 7 255HX CPU 和 RTX 5070 Ti GPU 的 2K IPS 显示屏开始，售价为 2500 美元，到我们配备 1600p OLED 面板的全配置评测机，售价超过 4000 美元。

16 英寸游戏机的替代产品包括微星 Vector 16 HX, 联想Legion 9 16或雷蛇刀锋 16.

更多惠普评论：

规格

HP Omen Max 16 ah000

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 156 W PL2 / Short Burst, 109 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 1597 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR7, 572.62, Advanced Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, SK Hynix, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 26-26-26-52

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, Samsung ATNA60DL02-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)

Storage

WDC PC SN810 2TB, 2048 GB

Soundcard

Intel Arrow Lake-S PCH - ACE (Audio Context Engine)

Connections

2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24.9 x 357 x 269

Battery

83 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: 1080p30
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Keyboard: Beveled, Keyboard Light: yes, Omen Gaming Hub, HP Smart, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.807 kg, Power Supply: 933 g

Price

3800 USD

Amazon

$3,299.00

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

箱子 - 密集包装

虽然尺寸不同，但 Omen Max 16 在外观上与即将上市的 2024 Omen 16 非常相似，包括黑色磨砂配色、后部设计和铰链以及光滑的铝制表面。主要区别包括键盘和前缘的新 LED 灯条，这与最新的 Legion Pro 7i 16 G10 设计.

底座周围的制造质量依然出色，但机盖和铰链本应更加坚固，以获得更好的耐用性。例如，在调整角度时，盖子容易摇晃，按压屏幕后面的中心位置时，表面的弯曲程度比刀锋 16 或上述联想产品更大。

惠普确实在 "Omen Max 16 "中加入了 "Max"，因为该机型比即将推出的 Omen 16 更厚更重。重量的增加尤其明显，因为该系统比竞争对手如ROG Zephyrus G16或去年的Legion 9 16IRX9。即使对于 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑来说，这也是一个相当高密度的设计。

加长的后部设计更小，不像最新的Legion Pro 7i 16 G10 那样激进

尺寸比较

HP Omen 16 (2024) MSI Vector 16 HX A14V HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX DIN A4 ❌

连接性

尽管外部和内部都发生了变化，但端口选项仍与 Omen 16 相同。这并不一定是坏事，因为该机型集成了大量可供选择的端口，与其他机型相比更具竞争力，但内容创作者可能会对缺少集成的 SD 读卡器感到遗憾。

左： 2x USB-C Thunderbolt 4 w/ DisplayPort 2.1 + Power Delivery，3.5 毫米耳机

交流

英特尔 BE200 标配 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4 连接功能。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card	1781 (1669^min, 1680.89^P1 - 1877^max) MBit/s +40%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel BE201 320MHz	1660 (1542^min, 1547.8^P1 - 1822^max) MBit/s +31%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1392 (740^min - 1497^max) MBit/s +10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1378 (539^min - 1507^max) MBit/s +9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1270 (961^min - 1408^max) MBit/s
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW	1188 (966^min - 1409^max) MBit/s -6%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card	1708 (1681^min, 1682.16^P1 - 1731^max) MBit/s +20%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1693 (1660^min - 1709^max) MBit/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel BE201 320MHz	1587 (1550^min, 1555.51^P1 - 1603^max) MBit/s +12%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1562 (657^min - 1677^max) MBit/s +10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1422 (1224^min - 1482^max) MBit/s
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW	1268 (973^min - 1456^max) MBit/s -11%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1569 (771^min - 1600^max) MBit/s +26%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW	1419 (966^min - 1534^max) MBit/s +14%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1242 (1202^min - 1314^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1660 (1606^min - 1685^max) MBit/s +10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1513 (1456^min - 1541^max) MBit/s
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW	1045 (843^min - 1252^max) MBit/s -31%

HP Omen Max 16 ah000; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1242 (1202-1314)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1512 (1456-1541)

网络摄像头

标配 200 万像素网络摄像头，带红外和物理快门。

ColorChecker HP Omen Max 16 ah000: 13.56 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 24.1 ∆E

维护

只需一把普通的十字螺丝刀，就能轻松拆下底部面板。两个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘插槽和两个 SODIMM 插槽都有清晰的标签，方便最终用户升级。从技术上讲，WLAN 模块也是可拆卸的，但它位于散热解决方案的下方，因此拆卸起来比较困难。

可持续性

外盖和底盖由 100% 的回收铝制成，而掌托和屏幕周围的边框则由 30% 至 45% 的消费后回收塑料制成。

配件和保修

包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外，没有任何其他附件。如果在美国购买，通常适用一年有限制造商保修。

输入设备 - 更熟悉、更明亮

键盘

惠普对键盘进行了改动，使其更像最近推出的 Omen Transcend 14 的 "零格 "键盘。 Omen Transcend 14.与Legion Pro 7i 16 G10 相比，RGB 背光更加鲜艳，但键入体验仍然不错，即使键入不浅，反馈也更轻。遗憾的是，这次的方向键变小了，而适当的数字键盘取代了 2024 设计中笨拙的 PgUp、PgDn、Home 和 End 键。

触摸板

点击板尺寸与 2024 年的 Omen 16 相同，为 12.5 x 8 厘米。相比之下，Blade 16 或 Zephyrus G16 等同类机型的点击板更为宽敞，但 Omen Max 16 的点击并不灵活，这也是一种公平的权衡。

显示屏 - 240 Hz OLED，带 G-Sync 功能

三星 ATNA60DL02-0 OLED 面板与最近推出的 Zephyrus G14 上的面板非常相似，包括 240 Hz 刷新率、P3 色彩支持、亮度级别，甚至脉宽调制行为。它能满足大多数游戏和内容编辑的需求。

支持 G-Sync 和 HDR500，但不支持 Windows VRR。在启用 HDR 的情况下，我们测得的最大亮度为 594 尼特；如果仅在 SDR 模式下，则为 391 尼特。


379.1 cd/m²	374.5 cd/m²	376.1 cd/m²
383.8 cd/m²	376.5 cd/m²	378.2 cd/m²
390.7 cd/m²	388.2 cd/m²	388.7 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung ATNA60DL02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 390.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 381.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 376.5 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 0.94
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Samsung ATNA60DL02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	HP Omen 16 (2024) BOE BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1", 240 Hz	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Chi Mei N160GME-GTB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 CSOT T3 MNG007ZA2-2, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz
Display		-20%	-0%	-6%	-6%	-5%
Display P3 Coverage	99.7	68.6 -31%	99.9 0%	96.1 -4%	95.4 -4%	95.3 -4%
sRGB Coverage	100	98.6 -1%	100 0%	99.9 0%	99.7 0%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	98.2	70.6 -28%	96.9 -1%	85 -13%	85.4 -13%	86.6 -12%
Response Times		-3321%	24%	26%	-2096%	-1936%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.29 ?(0.15, 0.14)	14.1 ?(6.7, 7.4) -4762%	0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11) 24%	0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1) 31%	5.7 ?(2.8, 2.9) -1866%	12.6 ?(6.6, 6) -4245%
Response Time Black / White *	0.47 ?(0.25, 0.22)	9.3 ?(4.6, 4.7) -1879%	0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) 47%	0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) 47%	11.4 ?(6.5, 4.9) -2326%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) -2028%
PWM Frequency	960 ?(100)		960 0%	960 ?(100) 0%		5430 466%
Screen		-21%	0%	11%	-30%	-22%
Brightness middle	376.5	292 -22%	416 10%	391 4%	557.2 48%	631 68%
Brightness	382	291 -24%	418 9%	393 3%	506 32%	664 74%
Brightness Distribution	96	85 -11%	96 0%	98 2%	83 -14%	91 -5%
Black Level *		0.24			0.41	0.03
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.67	2.36 36%	1.6 56%	1.2 67%	2.91 21%	2.68 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.24	4.08 44%	2.1 71%	3.2 56%	5.94 18%	6.41 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.94	0.93 1%			1.63 -73%	2.68 -185%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.1	3 -173%	2.7 -145%	1.8 -64%	3.8 -245%	2.71 -146%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.101 ^105%	2.16 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6319 ^103%	5976 ^109%	6331 ^103%	6493 ^100%	6408 ^101%	6135 ^106%
Contrast		1217			1359	21033
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1121% / -571%	8% / 6%	10% / 11%	-711% / -369%	-654% / -460%

* ... smaller is better

与大多数 OLED 面板一样，显示屏开箱即按照 P3 标准进行了校准。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.25 ms rise
0.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.22 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.15 ms rise
0.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.14 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

960 Hz
Amplitude: 31 %

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8458 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于面板有光泽，在户外几乎总是不可避免地会产生眩光。

性能 - 负载情况下处理器温度很高

测试条件

在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 和 Omen Gaming Hub 设置为性能模式。我们建议用户熟悉使用 Omen Gaming Hub 来调整系统配置文件和设置。不过，该软件远非完美，因为它将重要的设置隐藏在多个子菜单甚至店面后面。

处理器

核心 Ultra 9 275HX Core Ultra 9 275HXOmen Max 16 中的 Core Ultra 9 275HX 可谓喜忧参半。一方面，它比表现不佳的酷睿 i9-14900HX快得多。但另一方面，该处理器的运行速度却比大多数采用相同处理器的笔记本电脑要慢，包括最近的 Legion Pro 7i 16 10 代慢 10%。这可能是由于惠普的设计具有更严格的散热限制，正如我们下面的压力测试部分所显示的那样。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5145 (5108.56-5171.97)

HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2939 (2630.37-4041.1)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø3112 (3034.67-3332.5)

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3489 (3470.41-3505.08)

MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4502 (4406.26-4547)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4648 (4505.52-4878.64)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5698 (5601.46-5746.3)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	86.8 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	85.2 pt
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	81.1 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	80.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 ^-2! Intel Core i9-13900HX	76.7 pt
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	73 pt
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	71.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	69.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	67.7 pt
Dell G16 7620 ^-2! Intel Core i7-12700H	49.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-2! AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	46.3 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	36597 (34151.5^min - 36596.9^max) Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (33449 - 39001, n=8)	36041 Points +8%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	33449 (32761.6^min - 33449.1^max) Points
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	32996 (29988.8^min - 32995.8^max) Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	31109 Points -7%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	26876 (25414.3^min - 26876.4^max) Points -20%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	26660 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	23805 Points -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	22080 Points -34%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	17181 (15714.9^min - 17181.1^max) Points -49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14085 Points -58%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2202 Points +3%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	2201 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2195 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2126 - 2252, n=8)	2187 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2133 Points 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2128 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2039 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2039 Points -4%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	1852 Points -13%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	1726 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1566 Points -26%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (13178 - 15517, n=8)	14190 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	14183 Points +8%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	13178 Points
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	12252 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	11637 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	10492 Points -20%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	10077 Points -24%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	9250 Points -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	8251 Points -37%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	6582 Points -50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5489 Points -58%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	846 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (811 - 866, n=8)	843 Points +4%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	837 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	831 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	817 Points +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	811 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	800 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	780 Points -4%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	719 Points -11%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	662 Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	595 Points -27%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5746 (5601.46^min - 5746.3^max) Points +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (5044 - 6060, n=8)	5654 Points +9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	5172 (5108.56^min - 5171.97^max) Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4685 (4358.72^min - 4684.94^max) Points -9%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	4547 (4406.26^min - 4547^max) Points -12%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	4320 (4198.59^min - 4320.12^max) Points -16%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	4041 Points -22%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	3505 (3470.41^min - 3505.08^max) Points -32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	3333 (3034.67^min - 3332.5^max) Points -36%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	2652 (2479.7^min - 2651.64^max) Points -49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2292 Points -56%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	336 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (317 - 343, n=8)	333 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	318 Points 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	317 Points
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	311 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	310 Points -2%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	308 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	295 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	289 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	249 Points -21%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	246 Points -22%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	220 Seconds * -116%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	184 Seconds * -80%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	162 Seconds * -59%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	159 Seconds * -56%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	140 Seconds * -37%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	117 Seconds * -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	105 Seconds * -3%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	102 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	102 Seconds *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (86 - 102, n=8)	92.3 Seconds * +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	90 Seconds * +12%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	123266 MIPS +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	122148 MIPS +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	117940 MIPS +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (104686 - 122818, n=8)	115603 MIPS +10%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	106033 MIPS +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	104686 MIPS
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	87555 MIPS -16%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	83714 MIPS -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	69676 MIPS -33%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	65012 MIPS -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64457 MIPS -38%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	7217 MIPS +17%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	7131 MIPS +15%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	7018 MIPS +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6931 MIPS +12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6186 - 7039, n=8)	6755 MIPS +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6607 MIPS +7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	6252 MIPS +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	6186 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	6136 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5727 MIPS -7%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	5343 MIPS -14%

Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=9)	19406 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	19081 Points +4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	18322 Points
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	18185 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	17207 Points -6%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	16490 Points -10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15671 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	12585 Points -31%

Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	3064 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	3052 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2917 - 3158, n=9)	3049 Points +5%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	2995 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2942 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2923 Points 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2917 Points
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	2729 Points -6%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (21195 - 25855, n=8)	23241 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	22414 Points +6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	21195 Points
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	20947 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	20510 Points -3%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	18590 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	15818 Points -25%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	15407 Points -27%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	15068 Points -29%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	11862 Points -44%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10167 Points -52%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2199 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2034 - 2292, n=8)	2199 Points +8%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	2136 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	2136 Points +5%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	2131 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	2108 Points +4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	2034 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2012 Points -1%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	2008 Points -1%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	1656 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1594 Points -22%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	38.9 fps +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (35 - 41.2, n=8)	38.4 fps +10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	35 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	32.2 fps -8%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	32.2 fps -8%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	29.7 fps -15%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	28.7 fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	25.9 fps -26%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	22.8 fps -35%
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	18.8 fps -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18 fps -49%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	53.8 s * -30%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (36.9 - 88, n=8)	49.9 s * -21%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	46.8 s * -13%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	46.4 s * -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	45 s * -9%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	44.9 s * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	42.8 s * -3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	41.4 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	40.6 s * +2%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	39.4 s * +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	36.9 s * +11%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell G16 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.505 sec * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4799 sec * -5%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4568 sec *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	0.4312 sec * +6%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	0.4255 sec * +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=8)	0.4156 sec * +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	0.4132 sec * +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.401 sec * +12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	0.3979 sec * +13%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3841 sec * +16%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3731 sec * +18%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

5172 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

298 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

317 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

13178 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

811 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2128 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

33449 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

1913 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

130.7 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	94.5 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88.2 pt
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	80.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	62.4 pt
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	60.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	37324 KRay/s +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (32615 - 39551, n=8)	36682 KRay/s +7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	34180 KRay/s
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	28921 KRay/s -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	27535 KRay/s -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	23492 KRay/s -31%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	17684 KRay/s -48%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (166245 - 194867, n=8)	183337 Points +6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	173656 Points
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	145828 Points -16%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	142039 Points -18%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136486 Points -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	116017 Points -33%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	90778 Points -48%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (7829 - 9482, n=8)	8865 MB/s +7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	8315 MB/s
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	7118 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7000 MB/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	5824 MB/s -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	5206 MB/s -37%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	4367 MB/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	141362 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (125013 - 139608, n=8)	134340 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	130803 Points +2%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	129824 Points +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	128670 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88891 Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	64720 Points -50%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	19115 Points +56%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	16524 Points +35%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16268 Points +33%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12272 - 14115, n=8)	13639 Points +11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	12272 Points
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	12268 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	9089 Points -26%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (87156 - 104057, n=8)	96691 Points +6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	90980 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	75107 Points -17%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	71401 Points -22%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	68467 Points -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	61884 Points -32%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	44165 Points -51%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	135370 MB/s +15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	133395 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (118108 - 134920, n=8)	129234 MB/s +9%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	118108 MB/s
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	89269 MB/s -24%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82547 MB/s -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	79949 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2085 MB/s +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1896 - 2220, n=8)	2069 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2043 MB/s +8%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1896 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1514 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1273 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1233 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	20284 KRay/s +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (17631 - 21372, n=8)	19822 KRay/s +7%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	18490 KRay/s
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15693 KRay/s -15%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	14791 KRay/s -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	12887 KRay/s -30%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	9420 KRay/s -49%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	58622 MPixel/s +20%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	54702 MPixel/s +12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (47726 - 56613, n=8)	51670 MPixel/s +5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	51417 MPixel/s +5%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	49514 MPixel/s +1%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	49135 MPixel/s 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	49039 MPixel/s

压力测试

运行 Prime95 显示了为什么 Omen Max 16 始终落后于Legion Pro 7i 16 G10，尽管它们都配备了相同的 Core Ultra 9 275HX 处理器。惠普处理器的主频为 2.5GHz、98C、108W，而联想处理器的主频为 3.8GHz、95C、156W。与 Omen Max 16 相比，后者能从 CPU 中获得更稳定的 Turbo Boost 性能。

用户应注意，三种电源配置文件之间存在性能差异：正如下面赛博朋克 2077 的截图所示，平衡、性能和释放三种电源配置文件之间存在性能差异。在 "释放 "模式下，GPU 功耗上限为 145 瓦，其次是 "性能 "模式下的 128 瓦和 "平衡 "模式下的 81 瓦。换句话说，玩家必须忍受惠普的最大风扇模式（即 "释放 "模式），才能获得 GPU 的全部功率。

游戏时 CPU 的温度比我们希望的要高，几乎达到 95 摄氏度，而 GPU 的温度则低得多，只有 70 摄氏度或更低。

	平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz)	GPU 时钟 (MHz)	平均 CPU 温度 (°C)	平均 GPU 温度 (°C)
系统闲置	--	--	57	36
Prime95 压力	3.5	--	98	48
Prime95 + FurMark Stress	2.4	1747	94	77
赛博朋克 2077》压力（释放模式）	1.9	2347	94	64
赛博朋克 2077》压力（性能模式）	1.9	2182	94	68
赛博朋克2077压力（平衡模式）	1.6	1665	91	71

系统性能

PCMark 10 的得分略低于预期，尤其是在对 CPU 性能要求最高的 "生产力 "子测试中。这可能是由于上文提到的处理器性能有些不尽如人意。

PCMark 10 / Score
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	8915 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	8864 Points +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	8794 Points
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	8664 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (8241 - 8819, n=5)	8617 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	8254 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	8239 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11385 Points +4%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	11255 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	11007 Points 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	10969 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9994 - 11103, n=5)	10823 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	10717 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	10626 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	11410 Points +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	11309 Points +24%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	10341 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10202 Points +12%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	9861 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9122 - 9444, n=5)	9267 Points +2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	9122 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	18445 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (16344 - 18445, n=5)	17334 Points -6%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	15725 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	15593 Points -15%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	14976 Points -19%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	13889 Points -25%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	13516 Points -27%

CrossMark / Overall
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2234 Points +12%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2192 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1995 - 2282, n=5)	2179 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2064 Points +3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1995 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1939 Points -3%

CrossMark / Productivity
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2138 Points +16%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2033 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1847 - 2119, n=5)	2009 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1918 Points +4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1847 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1755 Points -5%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2285 - 2606, n=5)	2479 Points +8%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2443 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2416 Points +6%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2349 Points +3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	2285 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2207 Points -3%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2195 Points +31%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1987 Points +19%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1673 - 2181, n=5)	1898 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1769 Points +6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1673 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1604 Points -4%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	359 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (315 - 359, n=5)	342 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	333 Points -7%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	323 Points -10%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	322 Points -10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	321 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	279 Points -22%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (317 - 337, n=3)	330 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	311 Points
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	309 Points
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	300 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	268 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	246 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	535 ms * -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	450 ms * -7%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	443 ms * -5%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	437 ms * -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	429 ms * -2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	420 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (409 - 420, n=5)	414 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		8794 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	97515 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	93640 MB/s +21%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	81940 MB/s +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74558 - 86549, n=8)	81822 MB/s +6%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	79039 MB/s +2%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	78053 MB/s +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	77500 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	102937 MB/s +22%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	86537 MB/s +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74094 - 97040, n=8)	86392 MB/s +2%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85898 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	84473 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	84192 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	78309 MB/s -7%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	103860 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	80589 MB/s +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72929 - 84581, n=8)	78801 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77715 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	77637 MB/s
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77312 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	75293 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	128.7 ns * -8%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	118.7 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 125.1, n=8)	112.8 ns * +5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	103.6 ns * +13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	96.2 ns * +19%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.1 ns * +29%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	81.8 ns * +31%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

LatencyMon 显示，在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时会出现轻微的 DPC 问题，但在播放 4K60 视频内容时不会出现掉帧记录。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	3220.2 μs * -112%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2448.1 μs * -61%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1602.6 μs * -6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	1516.1 μs *
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1248.3 μs * +18%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	492.6 μs * +68%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

WDC PC SN810 WDC PC SN810我们测试装置中的固态硬盘在达到约 6800 MB/s 的稳定最大速度时不会出现节流现象。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WDC PC SN810 2TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6749 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5118 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 744.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 486.4 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3536 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2618 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 66.16 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 132.9 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	94.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	71.1 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	65.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	58 pt
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	52.7 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	52.6 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5665 (5643.65^min - 5664.83^max) MB/s +66%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3790 (2816.71^min - 3789.94^max) MB/s +11%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3444 (3426.6^min - 3444.12^max) MB/s +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	3415 (3349.37^min - 3415.42^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3347 (3203.49^min - 3347.47^max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1607 (236.92^min - 1606.84^max) MB/s -53%
seq write
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5084 (5028.76^min - 5083.81^max) MB/s +98%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	3794 (3585.08^min - 3793.54^max) MB/s +48%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3750 (3377.21^min - 3749.92^max) MB/s +46%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3362 (2028.5^min - 3361.51^max) MB/s +31%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3134 (2912.36^min - 3134.19^max) MB/s +22%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	2570 (2187.36^min - 2569.74^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7144 (6531.64^min - 7143.5^max) MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	6780 (5762.77^min - 6780.16^max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	6766 (5345.22^min - 6765.62^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6523 (5649.96^min - 6522.56^max) MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	6278 (5683.91^min - 6278.45^max) MB/s -7%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4985 (4341.19^min - 4985.24^max) MB/s -26%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6117 (6097.29^min - 6117.18^max) MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	5861 (4855.26^min - 5860.72^max) MB/s +13%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	5187 (5110.55^min - 5187.31^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	5092 (4641.78^min - 5091.77^max) MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	4844 (4270.43^min - 4843.96^max) MB/s -7%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3176 (3161.84^min - 3175.51^max) MB/s -39%
4k q1 t1 read
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	85 (84.17^min - 84.96^max) MB/s +48%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	78.7 (77.61^min - 78.69^max) MB/s +37%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	69.2 (68.61^min - 69.17^max) MB/s +21%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	59.1 (58.3^min - 59.06^max) MB/s +3%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	58.1 (55.49^min - 58.06^max) MB/s +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	57.4 (57.08^min - 57.42^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	335 (331.92^min - 334.81^max) MB/s +124%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	265 (258.55^min - 264.55^max) MB/s +77%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	259 (209.68^min - 259.39^max) MB/s +73%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	209 (203.44^min - 208.84^max) MB/s +40%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	165.3 (162.66^min - 165.27^max) MB/s +11%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	149.4 (92.02^min - 149.43^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5399 (5342.26^min - 5399.42^max) MB/s +450%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3189 (3182.48^min - 3189.1^max) MB/s +225%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2997 (2834.64^min - 2996.72^max) MB/s +205%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1524 (1514.94^min - 1523.9^max) MB/s +55%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	982 (747.27^min - 982.13^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	848 (703.36^min - 848.14^max) MB/s -14%
4k q32 t16 write
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3054 (2391.68^min - 3054.16^max) MB/s +487%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2673 (2401.6^min - 2673.33^max) MB/s +414%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2210 (729.15^min - 2210.24^max) MB/s +325%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2071 (1783.46^min - 2071.1^max) MB/s +298%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	520 (486.41^min - 520.16^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	456 (68.45^min - 456.36^max) MB/s -12%

AS SSD
Score Total
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10491 Points +96%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	7379 Points +38%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6847 Points +28%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	5355 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	4945 Points -8%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4740 Points -11%
Score Read
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3701 Points +136%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	3215 Points +105%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2722 Points +73%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1732 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1569 Points 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	1569 Points
Score Write
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4927 Points +60%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	3074 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2686 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2635 Points -14%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2571 Points -16%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2177 Points -29%
Seq Read
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5868.59 MB/s +15%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	5105.48 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	5081 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	4884 MB/s -4%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4283.43 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2272 MB/s -55%
Seq Write
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5326.5 MB/s +72%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	4160 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3289 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	3282 MB/s +6%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	3100.36 MB/s
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3058.55 MB/s -1%
4K Read
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	78.67 MB/s +44%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	72.1 MB/s +32%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	64.4 MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	55.9 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	54.74 MB/s
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	52.69 MB/s -4%
4K Write
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	512.49 MB/s +176%
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	285.8 MB/s +54%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	230 MB/s +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	217 MB/s +17%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	188.6 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	185.44 MB/s
4K-64 Read
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3035.68 MB/s +202%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	2642 MB/s +163%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2439 MB/s +143%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1251.4 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	1009 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	1004.03 MB/s
4K-64 Write
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4108.09 MB/s +59%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	2578.56 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2168 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	2090 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	1926 MB/s -25%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1655.22 MB/s -36%
Access Time Read
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.097 ms * -80%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	0.054 ms *
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	0.051 ms * +6%
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.035 ms * +35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	0.035 ms * +35%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.034 ms * +37%
Access Time Write
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.07 ms * -17%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB	0.06 ms *
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.023 ms * +62%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048	0.021 ms * +65%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	0.019 ms * +68%
HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.017 ms * +72%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 WDC PC SN810 2TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6758 (5656.01-6797.71)

HP Omen 16 (2024) SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6983 (6099.15-7013.53)

GPU 性能 - 175 W TGP 目标值

手机 GeForce RTX 5090的速度仅比三年前的移动 RTX 4090快 10%到 20%。在原始光栅化方面，移动 RTX 5090 只比三年前的移动 RTX 4090 快 10%到 20%。台式机 RTX 5090的一半，但它仍然搭载了升级后的第五代张量内核，并支持 4:2:2 编码/解码，而这是旧版GeForce 40 系列所不具备的。

请注意，从 "释放 "模式降至 "性能 "模式只会降低几个百分点的 GPU 性能，如下表Fire Strike 所示。

电源配置文件	图形得分	物理得分	综合得分
释放模式	49342	44020	11675
性能模式	48146 (-2%)	43466 (-1%)	11522 (-1%)
平衡模式	45941 (-7%)	43842 (-0%)	11319 (-3%)
电池供电	15428 (-69%)	23175 (-47%)	2926 (-75%)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X	100 pt
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	84.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	81.6 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	80.7 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	78.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	74.3 pt
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	69.7 pt
Alienware m16 R1 AMD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	68.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	66.5 pt
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	50.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	42.7 pt
Dell G16 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	33.7 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X	88359 Points +22%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	72215 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	71866 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	70760 Points -2%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54052 - 72215, n=8)	67563 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	62862 Points -13%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	60154 Points -17%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	56373 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	54052 Points -25%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	45199 Points -37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	40257 Points -44%
Dell G16 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	29412 Points -59%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X	65190 Points +33%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	52065 Points +6%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42516 - 60880, n=9)	49826 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	49153 Points 0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	49115 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	45696 Points -7%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	44782 Points -9%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	44135 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	42516 Points -13%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	33058 Points -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	27562 Points -44%
Dell G16 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	21584 Points -56%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X	27791 Points +12%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	24873 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (19216 - 25129, n=9)	23465 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	23003 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	22082 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	21279 Points -14%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	19541 Points -21%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	19365 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	19216 Points -23%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13282 Points -47%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	11227 Points -55%
Dell G16 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	8855 Points -64%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X	25272 Points +10%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	22896 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	21992 Points -4%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (17820 - 23130, n=9)	21582 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	20039 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	18898 Points -17%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18392 Points -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	17820 Points -22%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	17719 Points -23%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	13636 Points -40%
Dell G16 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9224 Points -60%

3DMark 11 Performance		48481 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		36501 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		22896 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Dell G16 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	31 Seconds * -158%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	17 Seconds * -42%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	16 Seconds * -33%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	14 Seconds * -17%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	13 Seconds * -8%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9.9 - 15.3, n=9)	12.1 Seconds * -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	12 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	12 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	12 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	12 Seconds * -0%
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X	9 Seconds * +25%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Dell G16 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	52 Seconds * -247%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	28 Seconds * -87%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	23 Seconds * -53%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	22 Seconds * -47%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	19 Seconds * -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	18 Seconds * -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	18 Seconds * -20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	18 Seconds * -20%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 19.4, n=7)	17.1 Seconds * -14%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	15 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Dell G16 7620 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	326 Seconds * -101%
HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	289 Seconds * -78%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H	259 Seconds * -60%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370	210 Seconds * -30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	198 Seconds * -22%
Alienware m16 R1 AMD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX	185 Seconds * -14%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	183 Seconds * -13%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (125 - 259, n=9)	163.8 Seconds * -1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	162 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX	148 Seconds * +9%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

台式机 RTX 5090 可与 4K 显示器完美搭配，而移动 RTX 5090 则可与 2K 或 3K 显示器完美搭配。在应用任何 DLSS 或 FG 功能之前，像《怪物猎人荒野行动》或《艾伦觉醒 2 》这样的高要求游戏已经可以在 2K 显示器上以最高设置运行超过 60 FPS。如果在外部 4K 显示器上进行游戏，建议使用 DLSS 和/或稍低的设置，以将帧数保持在 60 以上。

如果 FPS 为 60 或更低，则不建议使用多帧生成功能，因为根据我们在《艾伦- 唤醒 2》或《夺宝奇兵》中的体验，输入延迟会变得非常明显。建议采用更低的设置、更低的分辨率和/或 DLSS 性能模式来提高基本帧率，然后再应用多帧生成。

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Alan Wake 2 | Indiana Jones and the Great Circle | Monster Hunter Wilds | Assassin's Creed Shadows

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	156.2 (125.7^min, 114.4^P1) fps +3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	151.9 (117.7^min, 106.2^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (105.3 - 157.5, n=8)	143.1 fps -6%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	118.6 (41.6^min) fps -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	112.3 (87.5^min) fps -26%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	105.3 (74.7^min) fps -31%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	83.9 (35.4^min) fps -45%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset DLSS4 quality no FG
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	126.2 (109.2^min, 104.4^P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	119 (102.5^min, 98.2^P1) fps -6%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (94.1 - 126.2, n=5)	115.1 fps -9%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	104.6 (74.9^min) fps -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	94.1 (81.4^min) fps -25%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	111.3 (93.2^min, 89.7^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 111.3, n=9)	104.6 fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	99.8 (85.5^min, 81.6^P1) fps -10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	98.6 (74.5^min) fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	83.2 (70.1^min) fps -25%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	79.4 (36.7^min) fps -29%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	56.2 (30.7^min) fps -50%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	52.8 (44.1^min, 41.9^P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	50.7 (42.1^min) fps -4%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (39.6 - 53.1, n=7)	50.6 fps -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	47.1 (38.4^min, 36^P1) fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	39.6 (33.6^min) fps -25%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	36.6 (25.3^min) fps -31%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	80.6 (70^min, 66.2^P1) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	80.6 fps 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	73.4 (63.1^min, 60.1^P1) fps -9%
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	64.4 (38.8^min) fps -20%
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	43.8 (27.5^min) fps -46%
3840x2160 Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	90 (78.8^min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.7 - 90.1, n=3)	87.9 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	84.4 (73^min) fps -6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	83.7 (72.7^min) fps -7%
3840x2160 Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	50.4 (43.2^min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (46.2 - 50.4, n=3)	49 fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	46.2 (39.8^min) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	41.7 (36.9^min) fps -17%

Alan Wake 2
1920x1080 High Preset + High Ray Tracing
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	70.9 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1)	70.9 fps 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	64.5 fps -9%
3840x2160 High Preset
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	46.2 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (33.4 - 47.7, n=6)	43.7 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	43.1 fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	43 (12.9^P0.1, 25.7^P1) fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	33.4 (24^P0.1, 25.8^P1) fps -28%
2560x1440 High Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	83.8 fps +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82.9 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (57.6 - 88.3, n=6)	78.7 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	76.7 (16.3^P0.1, 33^P1) fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	57.6 fps -31%
3840x2160 High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	120.6 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (116.3 - 120.6, n=2)	118.5 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	112.8 fps -6%
3840x2160 High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (65.8 - 66.7, n=2)	66.3 fps +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	65.8 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	62.8 fps -5%
3840x2160 High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (38.2 - 38.7, n=2)	38.5 fps +1%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	38.2 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	34.9 fps -9%

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle
1920x1080 Very Ultra Preset
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	142.3 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	129.2 fps -9%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (87.7 - 142.3, n=8)	124.5 fps -13%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	119.6 (77.3^P0.1, 85.6^P1) fps -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	87.7 fps -38%
2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset - DLSS Quality
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	120.6 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	120.1 fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	113.9 (76.4^P0.1, 82.5^P1) fps -6%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (76.2 - 122.4, n=5)	110.2 fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	76.2 fps -37%
3840x2160 Very Ultra Preset
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	68.6 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (48.2 - 70.8, n=8)	64.3 fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	63.2 fps -8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	62.3 (50.6^P0.1, 52.7^P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	48.2 (40.2^P0.1, 41.9^P1) fps -30%
2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (72.9 - 180, n=4)	103.8 fps +27%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	82 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	77.1 fps -6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	72.9 (32.6^P0.1, 33.8^P1) fps -11%
3840x2160 Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (51 - 109, n=4)	65.9 fps +27%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	51.8 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	28.4 fps -45%

Monster Hunter Wilds
1920x1080 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	90 fps +2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	88.2 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (66.4 - 89, n=7)	81.3 fps -8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	68.06 fps -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	66.4 fps -25%
2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	74.7 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	73.2 fps -2%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (54 - 75, n=7)	69.3 fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	65.61 fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	54 fps -28%
2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, DLSS3 quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	87.7 fps +3%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	85 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (63.9 - 86.4, n=5)	76.6 fps -10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	68.57 fps -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	63.9 fps -25%
3840x2160 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	47.5 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	45.2 fps -5%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (33.4 - 48.5, n=7)	44.7 fps -6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	44.07 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	33.4 fps -30%
3840x2160 ultra, RT: high, DLSS3 quality
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	64 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	61.8 fps -3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (57.6 - 64.5, n=4)	61.8 fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	57.59 fps -10%

Assassin's Creed Shadows
1920x1080 Ultra High
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	70 (24^min) fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	64 (27^min, 35^P0.1, 49^P1) fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	64 (43^min) fps -9%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (44 - 74, n=6)	63.2 fps -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	44 fps -37%
2560x1440 Ultra High
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	55 (45^min) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	55 (41^min) fps 0%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (37 - 59, n=6)	51 fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	50 (31^min, 33^P0.1, 39^P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	37 fps -33%
3840x2160 Ultra High
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	40 (33^min) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	40 (28^min) fps 0%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (35 - 41, n=5)	38.2 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	35 (16^min, 22^P0.1, 27^P1) fps -12%
2560x1440 Ultra High + DLSS Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	65 (46^min) fps +2%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	64 (50^min) fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	62 (29^min, 37^P0.1, 46^P1) fps -3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (45 - 69, n=4)	60 fps -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	45 fps -30%
3840x2160 Ultra High + DLSS Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	55 (43^min) fps +4%
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	53 (43^min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (47 - 55, n=3)	51.7 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	47 (25^min, 29^P0.1, 37^P1) fps -11%
2560x1440 Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	97 (72^min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (87 - 106, n=3)	96.7 fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	87 (66^min, 68^P0.1, 71^P1) fps -10%
3840x2160 Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	74 (61^min) fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (66 - 78, n=3)	72.7 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	66 (52^min, 53^P0.1, 56^P1) fps -11%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø151.4 (144.3-153.7)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD DLSS	QHD	4K DLSS	4K FSR	4K
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	215	186.6	178.9	161					151.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		226	203			177.2			104.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	140.4	141.5	112.6						89.9
Strange Brigade (2018)				382		319			179.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	173.7	171.6	161.5	151.9	126.2	111.3	80.2	46.4	52.8
Alan Wake 2 (2023)						82.9	69.7		46.2
F1 24 (2024)				152.2		104.3	87.9		52
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024)				142.3	120.6	115.9			68.6
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025)				88.2	85	74.7	64		47.5
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)				70	64	55	53		40

排放量

系统噪音

在运行浏览器或视频等负载要求不高的情况下，风扇能很好地保持安静，脉动极小。反之，即使在平衡模式下，风扇的噪音也会很快变大，在 3DMark 06 的前 90 秒内，我们测得的噪音为 48 分贝（A）。遗憾的是，这种情况在游戏笔记本电脑上很常见。

在平衡、性能和释放模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，风扇噪音分别稳定在 45 dB(A)、55 dB(A) 和 61 dB(A)。建议使用 60 dB(A)或以上的耳机，因为在这个阶段，即使内部扬声器的音量也不足以克服风扇。如上文 GPU 部分所述，"释放 "模式能最大限度地发挥 GPU 的性能，但相对于噪音的大幅增加而言，其增益非常小。因此，玩家可能会考虑使用 "性能模式 "或 "平衡模式"。

风扇噪音曲线（白色：背景，红色：系统空闲，蓝色：3DMark 06，橙色：《赛博朋克 2077》，绿色：《赛博朋克 2077》：赛博朋克 2077》，绿色：释放模式）

Noise Level

Idle		29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)
Load		47.7 / 61.1 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.8 dB(A)

	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB	HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048	MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
Noise		1%	4%	4%	-10%	15%
off / environment *	22.8	25 -10%	23.8 -4%	24.1 -6%	23.2 -2%	23 -1%
Idle Minimum *	29	29 -0%	23.8 18%	24.1 17%	33.5 -16%	23 21%
Idle Average *	29	30 -3%	27.2 6%	30.6 -6%	33.5 -16%	23 21%
Idle Maximum *	29	31 -7%	31.3 -8%	30.6 -6%	33.5 -16%	23 21%
Load Average *	47.7	46 4%	47.6 -0%	45.5 5%	52.1 -9%	39 18%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	54.8		51.3 6%	48.2 12%
Load Maximum *	61.1	47 23%	53.3 13%	53.4 13%	62 -1%	55.56 9%
Witcher 3 ultra *		47			62	55.32

* ... smaller is better

温度

游戏时，键盘和底盖上的热点温度分别可达 35 摄氏度和 46 摄氏度以上。这些区域位于机身后部，远离掌托、WASD 键或数字键盘等经常接触的区域。最明显的是，平均温度比我们在 2024 预兆 16摄氏几度，这可能是由于所有内部更新的缘故。

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


42.6 °C	42.8 °C	41.2 °C
37.2 °C	36.8 °C	36.2 °C
24.8 °C	25 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 34.7 °C


45.2 °C	50.2 °C	44.2 °C
36.2 °C	43 °C	37.2 °C
29.2 °C	31 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 50.2 °C
Average: 38.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 46 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


25.6 °C	27.6 °C	24.6 °C
24.8 °C	25.6 °C	24.6 °C
21.6 °C	21.8 °C	22.8 °C

Maximum: 27.6 °C
Average: 24.3 °C


25 °C	26.2 °C	25.2 °C
24.8 °C	25 °C	23.4 °C
22.8 °C	23.2 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 26.2 °C
Average: 24.3 °C

Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


32.4 °C	35.4 °C	33.4 °C
30.8 °C	32.4 °C	31.6 °C
21.4 °C	22.6 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 35.4 °C
Average: 29.6 °C


43 °C	46.2 °C	41.2 °C
34 °C	39 °C	31.4 °C
25.4 °C	27.2 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 46.2 °C
Average: 34.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 46.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).

	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat		-4%	4%	-10%	11%	-31%
Maximum Upper Side *	42.8	47 -10%	44 -3%	48.3 -13%	36.4 15%	56 -31%
Maximum Bottom *	50.2	57 -14%	44.1 12%	53.3 -6%	35.6 29%	53 -6%
Idle Upper Side *	27.6	25 9%	26.1 5%	28.3 -3%	26.6 4%	38 -38%
Idle Bottom *	26.2	26 1%	25.5 3%	30.3 -16%	27 -3%	39 -49%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

粉红噪声显示出良好的平衡，但最大音量仅为 78 dB(A)，与微星 Vector 16 HX 的 85 dB(A)相比，令人难以接受。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理--要求极高的处理器

耗电量

由于 OLED 面板和 GPU 设置的不同，在桌面上空转时的功耗差别很大。例如，在亮度设置为最低的省电 iGPU 模式下，空转功耗可低至 10 W，而在亮度为最高的高性能 dGPU 模式下，空转功耗为 47 W，屏幕显示全白。

在同时运行 Prime95 和 FurMark 时，即使是在 "释放 "模式下，功耗也会在 130 瓦到 270 瓦之间循环，这表明在完全受压的情况下保持性能稳定存在问题。虽然这种极端负载并不常见，但在大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑上运行相同的测试，结果会更加稳定和一致。

运行《赛博朋克 2077》所需的电量明显高于 ROG Zephyrus G16 或刀锋 16这可能是因为惠普采用了 HX 系列 CPU 和更高的 TGP 目标。

当 CPU 和 GPU 处于完全受压状态时，我们可以记录到 330 W 大型交流适配器（约 20 x 9 x 2.5 厘米）的最大功耗为 309 W。

在启动 Prime95 应力时，功耗会飙升至 209 W，然后由于热限制而下降并稳定在 130 W。

Prime95+FurMark 在 10 秒处启动压力。注意 1 分 20 秒后的波动率

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.29 / 2.1 Watt
Idle	9.9 / 28.6 / 47.1 Watt
Load	141.8 / 233 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WDC PC SN810 2TB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	HP Omen 16 (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, SSSTC CA6-8D2048, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Power Consumption		13%	31%	25%	-5%	-17%
Idle Minimum *	9.9	9 9%	9.4 5%	10.9 -10%	15.8 -60%	20.5 -107%
Idle Average *	28.6	16 44%	13.6 52%	13.5 53%	23.3 19%	27.7 3%
Idle Maximum *	47.1	35 26%	15.8 66%	13.7 71%	30 36%	32.1 32%
Load Average *	141.8	129 9%	115.4 19%	120.2 15%	123.9 13%	105 26%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	230		160.4 30%	177.6 23%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	253		164.5 35%	178.2 30%
Load Maximum *	233	285 -22%	216.7 7%	246.1 -6%	306 -31%	323 -39%
Witcher 3 ultra *		150.8			285	246

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø228 (108.1-308)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø340 (297-384)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø10.1 (8.29-17.7)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø36.9 (36.1-43.6)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø253 (231-293)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø318 (298-338)

Power Consumption external Monitor

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø130.4 (116.9-209)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø238 (220-263)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø153.1 (135.6-202)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø241 (239-242)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø241 (233-251)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø244 (232-256)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø16.2 (14.4-23.4)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø29.5 (28.5-38.9)

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø230 (219-236)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø319 (310-326)

电池寿命

在类似的平衡电源配置文件和 iGPU 设置下，WLAN 运行时间与我们在 2024 Omen 16 上记录的时间几乎完全相同。虽然乍听之下有些乏善可陈，但请记住，与旧机型的 IPS 面板相比，我们的 2025 机型采用了要求更高的高分辨率 OLED 面板。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		8h 42min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 11min

	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 83 Wh	HP Omen 16 (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh	MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh
Battery Runtime		1%	54%	36%	12%	33%
Reader / Idle	522				641 23%
WiFi v1.3	350	352 1%	540 54%	475 36%	332 -5%	290 -17%
Load	71				84 18%	129 82%
H.264				592		294
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd				71

笔记本检查评级

Back to the verdict

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 - 05/03/2025 v8
Allen Ngo

Chassis

82 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

92%

Connectivity

70 / 80 → 87%

Weight

58 / 10-68 → 82%

Battery

68 / 95 → 71%

Display

84%

Games Performance

94%

Application Performance

90%

AI Performance

100%

Temperature

90 / 95 → 94%

Noise

56 / 90 → 63%

Audio

77%

Camera

38 / 75 → 50%

Average

67%

82%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
73.8%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 49.4%

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Height	Display
1. 81.9%	HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: $3,299.00 List Price: 3800 USD	2.8 kg	24.9 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED
2. 86.7% ^{v7 (old)}	HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $1,169.09 HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ... 2. $1,349.00 HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop 16.... 3. $1,164.21 HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ... List Price: 3200 Euro	2.4 kg	23.5 mm	16.10" 2560x1440 182 PPI IPS
3. 90%	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $20.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 2. $99.99 240W Laptop Charger for Asus... 3. $96.99 240W Charger for Asus ROG Ze... List Price: 4799€	1.9 kg	17.4 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED
4. 87%	Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $5,495.00 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... 2. $5,698.00 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... 3. $5,698.00 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... List Price: 4399€	2.1 kg	17.4 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED
5. 88% ^{v7 (old)}	MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD	Amazon: 1. $45.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... 2. $2,042.99 MSI Vector 16 HX 16” 240Hz... 3. $59.99 Smatree 16 inch Laptop Sleev... List Price: 2700 USD	2.7 kg	28.55 mm	16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS
6. 83.9%	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD	Amazon: $4,799.00 List Price: 4899 Euro	2.5 kg	22.7 mm	16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI MiniLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5315 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 531242 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Omen Max 16 笔记本电脑评测：速度超快，但温度有点高

Allen Ngo, 2025-05- 5 (Update: 2025-05- 5)

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core in comparison
Asus ExpertCenter PN42-BBN200MV (min) N200, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs	91
...
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1794
Minisforum BD795i SE R9 7945HX, Radeon 610M	1799
Minisforum BD790i R9 7945HX, Radeon 610M	1828
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	1913
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1940
Intel Core i7-14700K i7-14700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	1982
R9 7950X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8G	1991
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
i5-13600K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	47895
i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	47984
R9 7900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	48185
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	48481
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	48486
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	48486
i9-13900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	48533
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (max) R7 9800X3D, GeForce RTX 5090	82642

结论 - 最快的 CPU 之一

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

箱子 - 密集包装

尺寸比较

连接性

交流

网络摄像头

维护

可持续性

配件和保修

输入设备 - 更熟悉、更明亮

键盘

触摸板

显示屏 - 240 Hz OLED，带 G-Sync 功能

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 负载情况下处理器温度很高

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

压力测试

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU 性能 - 175 W TGP 目标值

游戏性能

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart

排放量

系统噪音

温度

发言人

HP Omen Max 16 ah000 audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

能源管理--要求极高的处理器

耗电量

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

Power Consumption external Monitor

电池寿命

笔记本检查评级

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Transparency