评语 - 华硕 Zepohyrus Duo 是一款独特且功能强大的双屏可转换产品
新款华硕 ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 是一款非常独特的产品,虽然它带有 ROG Zephyrus 品牌的游戏设备,但对于需要双屏幕和强大的GeForce RTX 5090 GPU 的内容创作者或专业人士来说,它也是一款非常有趣的设备。用户体验非常好,你会发现华硕在双屏设备方面拥有丰富的经验,因此它的运行效果非常好。图像质量也非常好,尽管触摸层会导致明亮内容的图像略有颗粒感。
采用全新 Panther Lake CPU 和GeForce RTX 5090 GPU 的性能整体上非常不错,但无法赶上使用更高功率版 GPU 和更快的 HX 系列 CPU 的最快游戏笔记本电脑。对于内容创作者来说,64 GB 内存的限制也并不理想,因此总体而言,只有当你的工作流程确实依赖于两个屏幕时,才会推荐使用这款笔记本。如果您只是偶尔需要第二个屏幕,我们建议您使用 ProArt P16(配有超棒的串联 OLED 面板)或普通的 Zephyrus G16(或其他高端游戏机),必要时使用外接显示器。
Pros
Cons
华硕推出了搭载英特尔最新 Panther Lake 移动 CPU 和 Nvidia 旗舰 GPUGeForce RTX 5090 的全新高性能双屏可折叠机型,从而扩展了其 ROG Zephyrus 产品线。我们评测的新款 Zephyrus Duo GX651 配备了两个 120 Hz 的 2.8K OLED 屏幕、RTX 5090、64 GB 内存和 2 TB SSD。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接
新款 ROG Zephyrus Duo 体积庞大,底座厚实,配有合适的金属脚架,重达 2.8 千克。继普通 Zephyrus G16之后,Zephyrus Duo 再次采用了非常低调的设计风格,唯一华丽的元素就是横跨机盖的斜线照明条纹。机身整体质量上乘,没有任何弯曲。显示屏铰链调节良好,只有轻微的晃动。键盘可拆卸,通过蓝牙或 Pogo 销连接,因此也可自动充电。华硕在底部安装了一个维护盖,可以快速访问两个 M.2-2280-SSD 插槽,但要访问风扇则需要完全拆卸底座,包括触摸屏。
两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口和两个普通 USB-A 端口的连接性非常出色。SD 卡读卡器速度很快,但不支持最新的 SD-Express 标准。Wi-Fi 7 模块与 Wi-Fi 7 路由器配合使用,可实现出色的传输速率,我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题。华硕只配备了一个 1080p 网络摄像头,图像质量不是很好。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (ADATA SD8.0 Express 512 GBAV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (Angelbird AV Pro) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (20.9 - 210, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (ADATA SD8.0 Express 512 GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (Angelbird AV Pro) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.5 - 261, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

输入设备
可拆卸键盘(单区照明)非常坚固,整体上提供了舒适的键入体验,与普通的 ROG Zephyrus G16.点击板非常大(15 x 10 厘米),我们使用起来没有任何问题。它的下半部分支持机械点击,点击噪音不大。您还可以将副屏幕用作键盘,当然也可以使用触摸屏,但我们的设备没有配备触控笔。
显示屏
华硕使用了两块相同的 OLED 触摸屏,分辨率为 2880 x 1800 像素,刷新率为 120 Hz。光面屏幕的主观画质非常好,但由于触摸层的缘故,明亮的内容会略显颗粒感,不过在正常的坐姿距离下几乎看不出来。除此之外,您还能看到丰富的色彩、深邃的黑色和快速的响应时间。我们在所有亮度水平下都发现了 PWM 闪烁,但频率很高,为 960 Hz,对大多数用户来说应该不是问题。
通过使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析,我们发现 SDR 的最高亮度为 500 尼特,HDR 内容的最高亮度可达 1120 尼特(全白图像为 720 尼特)。与 240 Hz OLED 的 G16的 240 Hz OLED 屏幕要好,但不如 ProArt P16.华硕再次为 sRGB 和 P3 提供了准确的色彩配置文件。我们没有通过自己的校准进一步提高图像质量。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 499 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
88.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
CCT: 6440 K
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 ATNA60HR07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 ATNA60HC03-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 120 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 ATNA60KA01-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra ATNA60HR05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE ATNA60KA02-0, Tandem-OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 3% | -3% | 3% | -2% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.6 | 98.9 -1% | 99.9 0% | 96.1 -4% | 97.4 -2% | 97 -3% | 98.8 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 88.1 | 88.6 1% | 96.9 10% | 85 -4% | 96.8 10% | 85.3 -3% | 88.9 1% |
| Response Times | 36% | 67% | 48% | 53% | -5% | 50% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 2.1 ? | 0.3 ? 86% | 0.22 90% | 0.2 ? 90% | 0.27 ? 87% | 0.5 ? 76% | 0.26 ? 88% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.44 ? | 0.45 ? -2% | 0.25 43% | 0.25 ? 43% | 0.37 ? 16% | 0.4 ? 9% | 0.42 ? 5% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 960 ? | 480 ? | 960 | 960 ? | 1200 | 240 ? | 1200 ? |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 50 | 38 24% | 44 12% | 22 56% | 100 -100% | 22 56% | |
| Screen | 43% | -7% | -2% | 52% | 16% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 499 | 661 32% | 416 -17% | 391 -22% | 974 95% | 499 0% | 578 16% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 500 | 663 33% | 418 -16% | 393 -21% | 979 96% | 505 1% | 583 17% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 99 1% | 96 -2% | 98 0% | 98 0% | 97 -1% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 0.5 62% | 1.6 -23% | 1.2 8% | 0.9 31% | 0.9 31% | 1.6 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.1 | 1.4 55% | 2.1 32% | 3.2 -3% | 1.7 45% | 2.1 32% | 4.5 -45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 0.6 75% | 2.7 -13% | 1.8 25% | 1.3 46% | 1.6 33% | 2.6 -8% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.19 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6440 101% | 6565 99% | 6331 103% | 6493 100% | 6751 96% | 6445 101% | 6527 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 26% /
31% | 21% /
9% | 14% /
10% | 36% /
40% | 3% /
6% | 14% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.24 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.1 ms rise | |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz Amplitude: 50 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7873 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
华硕将 Nvidia 的高端 Blackwell GPU 与英特尔最新的 Panther Lake CPU 相结合,并提供 32 或 64 GB 的板载内存,但不能升级。
测试条件
华硕提供了多种电源配置文件。我们使用Turbo 模式来获得最佳 GPU 性能,而 CPU 性能在所有配置文件中基本相同。还有一个手动模式(最大 TGP 150W),但性能提升微乎其微。
| 能源概况 | CPU TDP | CB24 Multi | GPU TGP | Time Spy Graphics | 赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra | 最大风扇噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音 | 70 W | 1262 pts | 55 W | 11338 pts | 55 fps | 39.7 dB(A) |
| Performance | 70 W | 1270 pts | 105 W | 18144 pts | 81.9 fps | 48.1 dB(A) |
| 涡轮 | 70 W | 1271 pts | 135 W | 20420 pts | 91.6 fps | 54.1 dB(A) |
| 电池(性能) | 60 瓦 | 1249 分 | 55 瓦 | 9703 分 | 46.1 帧/秒 | 38.4 分贝(A) |
处理器
英特尔新 酷睿至尊 9 386H运行功耗为 70 瓦,性能良好,但 Panther Lake 更注重效率,其速度也略低于 Zephyrus G16 等产品中的酷睿至尊 9 285H。旧的 Zephyrus Duo2023 年的 Ryzen 9 7945 HX(130W)的多核性能要高得多。其他采用更快 HX 系列 CPU 的高端游戏笔记本电脑也是如此。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W -4! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (486 - 2298, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (1210 - 1271, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (124.6 - 126, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Gaming (95 - 138.2, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Average of class Gaming (10488 - 40970, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (20344 - 20841, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2057 - 2101, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1166 - 2319, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Average of class Gaming (4029 - 16108, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (7913 - 8299, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (787 - 796, n=2) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Gaming (442 - 878, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Average of class Gaming (1578 - 6271, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (3277 - 3303, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (249 - 314, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (156 - 160, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 330, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Average of class Gaming (33491 - 148086, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (71479 - 72596, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7441, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (6118 - 6493, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (15407 - 17405, n=4) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6625 - 22104, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2845 - 2913, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3259, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (17162 - 17246, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Gaming (6460 - 27010, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2134 - 2145, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2474, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (11.5 - 44.3, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (24.7 - 24.8, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (41.6 - 46.8, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (0.4321 - 0.4384, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3439 - 0.759, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 -1! | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 -1! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 -1! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H -1! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE -1! | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra -1! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10227 - 85542, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (20795 - 21727, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (51376 - 238426, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (109555 - 113595, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2180 - 9817, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5379 - 5604, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=107, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (7324 - 7332, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25115 - 128721, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (59158 - 61578, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (69610 - 70433, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (1245 - 1260, n=2) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5509 - 45446, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (11115 - 11627, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (74945 - 84167, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (v6.92.6600) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (12271 - 84167, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average of class Gaming (2930 - 8106, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (4689 - 4826, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
主观性能印象非常好,基准测试成绩也非常不错。我们也没有遇到任何稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 -4! | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 -4! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5828 - 11574, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 12600, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average of class Gaming (6845 - 18766, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7602 - 19351, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average of class Gaming (1366 - 2409, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1386 - 2216, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Gaming (1343 - 2729, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1226 - 2334, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=102, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 354, n=102, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Gaming (391 - 594, n=107, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9457 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (107528 - 119676, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 119676, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (99207 - 112454, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 112454, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (106443 - 120667, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 259, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (89.8 - 105.9, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
来自美光的 2 TB PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘(1.71 TB 可用)提供了非常好的传输速率,尽管在持续工作负载下性能开始有些波动。如果你想扩展存储容量,还有一个辅助 M.2-2280 插槽,但该插槽仅限于 PCIe 4.0-x4 速度。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
英伟达 GeForce RTX 5090配备 24GB VRAM 的 RTX 5090 仍是 2026 年市场上速度最快的移动 GPU,在我们的测试中,它的运行功耗高达 135 瓦。它支持高级 Optimus,GPU 性能不错,但还是比不上 2026 年的老款 2023 年的 Zephyrus DuoRTX 4090(175 瓦)。虽然这不是最快的 5090,但 GPU 性能仍优于 ProArt P16和 Zephyrus G16 2025相比,5090 的功耗被限制在 120 瓦。游戏性能依然出色,即使在 WQHD 分辨率下,你也能轻松玩到要求苛刻的游戏,并获得最高细节。在持续工作负荷下,游戏性能也非常稳定。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 42374 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 37289 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 19487 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 5271 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 21655 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Gaming (9 - 32, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9 - 18, n=19) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Gaming (15 - 228, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 37, n=18) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average of class Gaming (122 - 565, n=110, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (123 - 259, n=19) | |
* ... smaller is better
| F1 25 - 2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (30.2 - 37.5, n=8) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5 - 37.5, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 137.4 | 137.7 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 174.7 | 156.7 | 153.3 | 141.7 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 217 | 205 | 164.2 | 134.1 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 118.8 | 111.9 | 92 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 482 | 368 | 357 | 339 | 283 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 205 | 183.1 | 168.7 | 167 | 122.7 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 165.6 | 158.2 | 142.2 | 126.2 | 102.7 | 91.6 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 265 | 261 | 122.1 | 122.6 | 81.3 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 94 | 88 | 72 | 58 | 49 | |
| F1 25 (2025) | 205 | 190.9 | 49.1 | 51.8 | 30.7 |
排放与耗电量
系统噪音
冷却装置由两个风扇和一个蒸汽室组成。在日常工作中,风扇非常安静,建议在不对 GPU 造成压力的情况下使用静音 模式。在涡轮增压 模式下,风扇会发出高达 54 分贝(A)的巨大声响,因此玩游戏时应使用耳机。在静音 模式下,即使压力很大,噪音也会保持在 40 分贝(A)以下,但 GPU 性能几乎会减半。在我们的设备上,我们没有注意到任何电子噪音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.5 / 54.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -6% | -7% | 0% | 3% | 2% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.9 | 24.2 -1% | 23.8 -0% | 24.1 -1% | 24.1 -1% | 25.1 -5% | 25 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.9 | 24.2 -1% | 23.8 -0% | 24.1 -1% | 24.1 -1% | 25.1 -5% | 25 -5% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.9 | 27.6 -15% | 27.2 -14% | 30.6 -28% | 24.1 -1% | 25.1 -5% | 25 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23.9 | 32.6 -36% | 31.3 -31% | 30.6 -28% | 25.1 -5% | 25.1 -5% | 27.3 -14% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 45.5 | 42.6 6% | 47.6 -5% | 45.5 -0% | 44.2 3% | 36.9 19% | 37.3 18% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 54.1 | 51.2 5% | 51.3 5% | 48.2 11% | 52.7 3% | 48.5 10% | 47.8 12% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 54.1 | 53.2 2% | 53.3 1% | 53.4 1% | 52.7 3% | 48.5 10% | 47.8 12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -4% | 0% | -1% | -1% | -13% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 36.5 | 47 -29% | 42.7 -17% | 44.7 -22% | 41.8 -15% | 48.3 -32% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 46.8 | 51.6 -10% | 49.1 -5% | 42.8 9% | 47.9 -2% | 53.3 -14% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27.3 | 24.9 9% | 25.4 7% | 26.9 1% | 26.3 4% | 28.3 -4% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 30.4 | 25.5 16% | 25.5 16% | 27.3 10% | 27.6 9% | 30.3 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
华硕采用了六扬声器音响系统,音质不错,但 ProArt P16 和Galaxy Book 6 Ultra 等产品的表现略胜一筹。
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Micron MTFDLBA2T0PBM, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, SSSTC CA6-8D2048, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD, Tandem-OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -29% | -30% | -35% | -29% | 28% | -10% | -153% | -97% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 6.4 | 10.9 -70% | 9.4 -47% | 10.9 -70% | 8.8 -38% | 4.4 31% | 8.5 -33% | 17.4 ? -172% | 13.5 ? -111% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.6 | 12.1 -59% | 13.6 -79% | 13.5 -78% | 16.1 -112% | 6.4 16% | 13.6 -79% | 25 ? -229% | 19.1 ? -151% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.8 | 12.5 -60% | 15.8 -103% | 13.7 -76% | 16.5 -112% | 7.1 9% | 14.1 -81% | 30.2 ? -287% | 24.4 ? -213% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 106.1 | 129.3 -22% | 115.4 -9% | 120.2 -13% | 89.3 16% | 55.1 48% | 84.5 20% | 136.8 ? -29% | 108 ? -2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 184 | 172.8 6% | 160.4 13% | 177.6 3% | 157.9 14% | 133 28% | 118.1 36% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 176.2 | 176.6 -0% | 164.5 7% | 178.2 -1% | 160.6 9% | 134.3 24% | 120.3 32% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 230.7 | 233.9 -1% | 216.7 6% | 246.1 -7% | 177.4 23% | 143.9 38% | 143 38% | 337 ? -46% | 254 ? -10% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
笔记本检查评级
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651
- 05/07/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX651 Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $3,299.99 ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX6... 2. $15.99 KEANBOLL (4 Pack) Designed f... 3. $3,939.99 ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 AI Gam... List Price: 6700€ | 2.8 kg | 24.9 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4799€ | 2 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,999.99 Samsung 16” Galaxy Book6 U... 2. $2,449.99 Samsung 16” Galaxy Book6 U... 3. $3,167.91 Samsung 16” Galaxy Book6 U... List Price: 3599€ | 1.9 kg | 15.4 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 4500€ | 1.9 kg | 15.8 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI Tandem-OLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 2800€ | 1.9 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4399€ | 2.1 kg | 17.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.





























































