Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

搭载 RTX 5090 和 240 Hz OLED,与 ROG、Legion 等公司竞争 - 技嘉 Aorus Master 16 游戏笔记本评测

谁是师傅,谁是徒弟?

我们终于拿到了精通测试的 Aorus Master 16,它配备了 RTX 5090、OLED 显示屏、Thunderbolt 5、PCIe 5.0 和 WiFi 7。这就是售价 4300 美元的新性能之王?
Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AI Blackwell RTX 5000 Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Arrow Lake Nvidia Wi-Fi 7

评价:快速的 OLED 游戏机,但声音大、价格昂贵且未完全优化

由于配备了 RTX 5090,Aorus Master 16 成为了一款超级强劲的游戏笔记本电脑。它拥有 Thunderbolt 5 等现代连接技术,支持 Wi-Fi 7,风扇控制可根据负载调节转速,使游戏笔记本电脑在低负载时也能保持安静。

另一方面,它的风扇在较高负载下的音量非常大,几乎达到 60 分贝。尽管如此,XMG Neo 16 的性能还是不错的,但它并没有打破任何记录。 XMG Neo 16联想Legion Pro 7i更快。定期的 BIOS 和 GiMate 更新已经解决了最初的问题和延迟。总体而言,虽然在制造质量(关键词:左键点击触摸板)和驱动程序优化方面仍有一些改进的余地,但买家还是以高价买到了一台功能非常强大的 OLED 游戏笔记本电脑。

Pros

+ 亮丽的 1,600p OLED
+ 非常稳定的 2D/3D 性能
+ 风扇能很好地适应负载
+ 现代连接

Cons

- 键盘标签对比度低
- 左键点击触摸板有时会挂起
- 负载时声音很大
- 空耗仍然过高
- 昂贵

价格和供应情况

您可以从亚马逊购买配备 RTX 5090 的机型,目前售价为 4299.99 美元

Aorus 在 2025 年的 CES 上展示了新的 Master 系列,我们终于有机会对其进行测试。配备 RTX 5090 的 16 英寸笔记本电脑的高端型号承诺总 TDP 高达 230 瓦(55 + 175 瓦),而 18 英寸版本而我们最近测试的 18 英寸版本的 TDP 甚至高达 270 瓦。

规格 - RTX 5090 和 Core Ultra 9 275HX

Aorus Master 16
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24 x 2.1 - 5.4 GHz, 155 W PL2 / Short Burst, 115 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 583.61
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB DDR5-5600
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL03-0 (SDC41AB), OLED, G-Sync, HDR True Black 500, ClearMR 10000, Pantone Validated, glossy: yes, HDR, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)
Storage
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, 1024 GB 
, 2x Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, 1860 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Arrow Lake-S PCH - ACE (Audio Context Engine)
Connections
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Headset jack, Card Reader: Micro-SD-Reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 29.9 x 357 x 254
Battery
99 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: Full-HD Webcam
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 4x 2 W speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.493 kg, Power Supply: 729 g
Price
4.75 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和连接性 - 功能丰富,结构合理

徽标投影仪
徽标投影仪
背面有 2 个 LED 灯带
背面有 2 个 LED 灯带
前端有 1 个 LED 灯带
前端有 1 个 LED 灯带

其 "Dark Tide"(黑色)配色的外壳主要由塑料制成,底部采用了有趣的结构,内部采用了 Aorus 的设计,外部配备了照明元素,包括一个 "徽标投影仪",可将 "Aorus "字样从显示屏底部中央投射到表面(如桌子)上。这款笔记本电脑的总体设计明显基于 Aorus 16X.

不过,Master 16 的厚度相当大,约为 30 毫米,而 Aorus 16X 的厚度仅为 25 毫米。 华硕 ROG Strix Scar 16XMG Neo 16 E25具有相似的尺寸,甚至更重。刀锋 刀锋 16Zephyrus G16当然,它们要薄得多,也轻得多。

该设备的外壳看起来相当稳定,扭动时几乎不会发出任何噪音。显示屏略有反弹,铰链可以更紧一些,最大开启角度约为 130 度。

遗憾的是,它的 FHD 网络摄像头拍摄出的照片并不美观,色彩偏差较大,并带有严重的蓝色色调。由于支持 Wi-Fi 7,其传输速率相当高。笔记本电脑的 micro SD 读卡器运行速度相当快。Master 16 配备了一个 Thunderbolt 5 接口和一个 Thunderbolt 4 接口,其他方面的配置也不错。插孔接口位于右前侧的位置并不理想。

尺寸比较

357 mm 254 mm 29.9 mm 2.5 kg354 mm 268 mm 30.8 mm 2.8 kg356.7 mm 259.9 mm 27.9 mm 2.9 kg355 mm 250.5 mm 17.4 mm 2.1 kg354 mm 246 mm 17.4 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
右侧USB-A 3.2 Gen 2、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C(PD 3.0、DP 1.4、USB 4)、微型 SD 读卡器、耳机插孔
右侧USB-A 3.2 Gen 2、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C(PD 3.0、DP 1.4、USB 4)、微型 SD 读卡器、耳机插孔
左:电源、LAN、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen 2、带 Thunderbolt 5 的 USB-C(PD 3.0、DP 2.1、USB 4)
左:电源、LAN、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen 2、带 Thunderbolt 5 的 USB-C(PD 3.0、DP 2.1、USB 4)
前部:无连接
前部:无连接
背面:无连接
背面:无连接
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
182 MB/s +61%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
171 (169.48min - 194.55max) MB/s +51%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
133 MB/s +18%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
112.95 (84.14min - 119.3max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 204, n=73, last 2 years)
97.9 MB/s -13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
216.5 MB/s +5%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
205.44 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
193.2 MB/s -6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
181.81 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 261, n=72, last 2 years)
127.9 MB/s -38%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1781 (1669min, 1680.89P1 - 1877max) MBit/s +12%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1660 (1544min, 1548.64P1 - 1812max) MBit/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel BE201 320MHz
1660 (1542min, 1547.8P1 - 1822max) MBit/s +5%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1588 (743min - 1692max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1577 (796min - 1617max) MBit/s -1%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (469 - 1660, n=30)
1244 MBit/s -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1862, n=122, last 2 years)
1238 MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card
1708 (1681min, 1682.16P1 - 1731max) MBit/s +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1677 (1641min - 1709max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1604 (1554min - 1623max) MBit/s -4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1588 (1563min, 1565.32P1 - 1610max) MBit/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel BE201 320MHz
1587 (1550min, 1555.51P1 - 1603max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1741, n=122, last 2 years)
1419 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (838 - 1736, n=30)
1399 MBit/s -17%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1621 (1491min - 1719max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1538 (784min - 1597max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 2355, n=54, last 2 years)
1408 MBit/s -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (943 - 1653, n=21)
1376 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1694 (842min - 1708max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
1518 (762min - 1536max) MBit/s -10%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
  (725 - 1770, n=21)
1505 MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=54, last 2 years)
1473 MBit/s -13%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1491-1719)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1512 (784-1597)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1665 (842-1708)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1492 (762-1536)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1563 (743-1692)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1660 (1542-1822)
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1781 (1669-1877)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1660 (1544-1812)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1550 (796-1617)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1677 (1641-1709)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel BE201 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1587 (1550-1603)
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1708 (1681-1731)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1588 (1563-1610)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1604 (1554-1623)
ColorChecker
18.1 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
19 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: 16.47 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 22.28 ∆E

维护

12 颗三种不同长度的螺丝将底板固定到位。但要注意的是,由于 LED 灯的存在,底板与顶板之间仍有连线。在内部,你可以看到两个 M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘(可更换的 WLAN 模块位于其中一个下面)、内存组、旋入式电池以及两个风扇。

请注意12 个螺丝,3 种不同长度
请注意12 个螺丝,3 种不同长度
在内部,底部仍通过电缆与底座连接
在内部,底部仍通过电缆与底座连接
只有 2 个风扇,而不是像 Master 18 那样有 4 个风扇
只有 2 个风扇,而不是像 Master 18 那样有 4 个风扇
Wi-Fi 模块位于其中一个固态硬盘下方
Wi-Fi 模块位于其中一个固态硬盘下方

可持续性

Aorus 没有提供任何有关笔记本电脑二氧化碳排放量的信息。其包装中的塑料含量不到 5%(包装盒手柄、笔记本电脑套、防尘布),其余部分由纸板制成。

输入设备 - 不算高端

虽然方向键大小正常,QWERASD 键也有高亮显示,但对于 16 英寸设备来说,笔记本电脑的按键感觉还是比较小。按键上的文字有点太暗,暗键的对比度也很低。在这种情况下,照明灯会有所帮助,但这样一来,亮色游戏键的对比度就太低了。专用的 GiMate 按键位于 F 排的右侧,用于向人工智能发出指令,但效果并不好。

按键的行程可以归类为中短,反馈也可以更敏锐一些;感觉有点软。触摸噪音适中。

笔记本电脑的触摸板又大又漂亮,在干燥环境下非常顺滑。不过,集成按键的按压点很短;在我们的测试过程中,左键曾多次卡住。

键盘
键盘
触摸板
触摸板
薄键帽
薄键帽
背光
背光
突出显示的 WASD 键
突出显示的 WASD 键
无数字键盘
无数字键盘

显示屏 - 1600p OLED 显示屏,安装在 Master 16 中

清晰的 OLED 子像素
清晰的 OLED 子像素

Aorus 安装了反射式 1,600p OLED,刷新率为 240 Hz,DCI-P3 覆盖率为 100%,并支持 HDR 和 G-Sync。

在 SDR 模式下,当显示 100% 白色时,我们测得的平均亮度为 437 尼特,在 96% 时亮度非常均匀。在 APL 25 测试的 HDR 模式下,亮度甚至达到了 635 尼特。面板的闪烁频率高达 960 Hz,即使是敏感用户也不会感到不适。

当然,它的对比度也非常出色,这要归功于其极高的黑度,这是 OLED 面板的典型特征。当然,我们没有注意到任何背光渗色现象,只有纯粹的黑色。该面板几乎完全覆盖了 sRGB,甚至 Display-P3 和 AdobeRGB 也达到了 95% 左右。

435
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA60DL03-0 (SDC41AB) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 447 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 437.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 428 cd/m²
Contrast: 5438:1 (Black: 0.08 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85, calibrated: 2.03
ΔE Greyscale 3.11 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
94.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
ATNA60DL03-0 (SDC41AB), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Display
3%
-3%
-1%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
95.3
99.9
5%
96.1
1%
99
4%
99.1
4%
sRGB Coverage
98.8
100
1%
99.9
1%
100
1%
99.9
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94.1
96.9
3%
85
-10%
87.2
-7%
95.6
2%
Response Times
25%
22%
-1805%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.24 ?(0.12, 0.12)
0.22
8%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
17%
7.4 ?(2.4, 5)
-2983%
0.24 ?(0.15, 0.09)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
0.43 ?(0.18, 0.25)
0.25
42%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
42%
10.4 ?(0.6, 9.8)
-2319%
0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)
7%
PWM Frequency
960
960
960 ?(100)
20610 ?(100)
960
PWM Amplitude *
47
44
6%
100
-113%
Screen
16%
18%
38%
60%
Brightness middle
435
416
-4%
391
-10%
764
76%
418
-4%
Brightness
437
418
-4%
393
-10%
747
71%
420
-4%
Brightness Distribution
96
96
0%
98
2%
93
-3%
98
2%
Black Level *
0.08
0.1
-25%
0.02
75%
Contrast
5438
7640
40%
20900
284%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.42
1.6
34%
1.2
50%
1.2
50%
1.07
56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.81
2.1
56%
3.2
33%
2.8
42%
4.04
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.03
1.07
47%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.11
2.7
13%
1.8
42%
1.5
52%
1.12
64%
Gamma
2.48 89%
2.16 102%
2.2 100%
2.17 101%
2.29 96%
CCT
6270 104%
6331 103%
6493 100%
6556 99%
6417 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
15% / 14%
12% / 14%
-589% / -365%
22% / 39%

* ... smaller is better

面板在开箱后直接进行了正确校准,但没有达到最大亮度。在这种情况下,其 DeltaE 值略微偏高。我们使用 X-Rite i1 Pro 3 和 Calman 软件(针对 P3 色彩空间)进行了手动校准,稍稍减少了偏差,尤其是在灰度方面。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检查器
颜色检查器
灰度校准
灰度校准
饱和度校准
饱和度校准
色彩校验仪已校准
色彩校验仪已校准

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.18 ms rise
↘ 0.25 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.12 ms rise
↘ 0.12 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 960 Hz
Amplitude: 47 %

The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8429 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

亮度为 100
亮度为 100
亮度为 75
亮度为 75
亮度为 50
亮度为 50
亮度为 25
亮度为 25

不出所料,它的反光表面在室外会令人讨厌。尽管如此,当从上方直接观看时,笔记本电脑明亮、高对比度的面板还是弥补了这一缺陷。

直接俯视图
直接俯视图
室外斜景
室外斜景
直接俯视图
直接俯视图
右上方斜视图
右上方斜视图
左下方斜视图
左下方斜视图

性能 - 非常稳定,但不是最高

Master 16 是一款真正的游戏笔记本电脑,而不仅仅是视觉效果(LED 灯带)。三种型号仅在 GPU 配置上有所不同。我们的顶级型号配备了 RTX 5090RTX 5080RTX 5070 Ti则是更多选择。

测试条件

GiMate 是笔记本电脑的控制中心。由于结构简单,主屏幕清晰明了,但在其他菜单部分就有些力不从心了。此外,GiMate 还需要优化,它的加载时间较长,CPU 负载也会有所降低。

总的来说,笔记本电脑的图形切换似乎存在一些问题。例如,在拔下插头时,我们被询问是否要关闭 dGPU 以节省能源,但即使我们说不,dGPU 也不再处于活动状态。在 GiMate 中,我们在 "场景"-"电源"-"AI Power Gear II "菜单中隐约发现,即使在游戏模式下,只要电池模式激活,dGPU 默认就会停用。我们将模式更改为 Optimus,并将其设置为 "游戏"配置文件的最高性能。只有这样,要求更高的 3D 应用程序才能在电池模式下正常运行。

事实上,默认情况下几乎不可能在游戏模式下运行(远离电源插座),这是开发人员的一个奇怪决定。此外,笔记本有时需要半分钟才能识别出我们已重新插入电源适配器。

在我们测试期间,BIOS 和 GiMate 的更新定期发布,大大改善了这些问题(如电源插头问题、延迟)。通过 GiMate 的实时更新,安装非常简单。

我们在基准测试中选择了游戏模式,并激活了人工智能增强功能。

GiMate:有时加载时间较长
GiMate:有时加载时间较长
主屏幕和性能配置文件
主屏幕和性能配置文件
系统设置
系统设置
场景
场景
这是在电池模式下提示的。但是,拒绝该请求也会导致 3D 问题
这是在电池模式下提示的。但是,拒绝该请求也会导致 3D 问题

处理器

游戏简介
游戏简介
简介 创意
简介 创意
平衡型材
平衡型材
简介 节能
简介 节能
电池
电池

其核心是Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX它拥有 24 个内核,主频为 2.1 至 5.4 GHz。这是一款高端笔记本电脑 CPU,集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU(拥有 13 个 TOPS)和一个拥有 4 个内核的小型英特尔显卡。

该 CPU 在所有测试中的表现都符合我们的预期,但相同的 CPU 在以下测试中速度更快 华硕 Strix Scar 18Neo 16而更薄的 Blade 16 和 Zephyrus G16 则更慢。

我们的 Cinebench R15 耐用性测试(Multi)显示性能非常稳定。笔记本电脑的最大功耗为 140 瓦。

在电池模式下,后者只有约 39 瓦,性能损失约为 50%,与节能模式类似。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

03106209301240155018602170248027903100341037204030434046504960527055805890Tooltip
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5596 (5505.09-5679.4)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø3112 (3034.67-3332.5)
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø3489 (3470.41-3505.08)
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX: Ø5996 (5942.65-6103.14)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5942 (5879.76-6059.69)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4396 (4349.72-4455.83)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
84 pt
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
83.3 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
 
79.1 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
78.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
70.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
62.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
61 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
58.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
39384 Points +8%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
39001 Points +7%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
36329 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (30712 - 40970, n=12)
36040 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28867 Points -21%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
23805 Points -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 40970, n=146, last 2 years)
23161 Points -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
22080 Points -39%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2252 Points +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2216 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2126 - 2267, n=12)
2211 Points 0%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2176 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2133 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2117 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2039 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2267, n=146, last 2 years)
1929 Points -13%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15517 Points +8%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
15309 Points +7%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
14307 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (12257 - 16108, n=12)
14172 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10968 Points -23%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
9250 Points -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 16108, n=146, last 2 years)
8916 Points -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
8251 Points -42%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
866 Points +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
854 Points
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
853 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (811 - 870, n=12)
851 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
817 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
810 Points -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
800 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 870, n=146, last 2 years)
743 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
6103 (5942.65min - 6103.14max) Points +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6060 (5879.76min - 6059.69max) Points +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (4853 - 6271, n=12)
5730 Points +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5679 (5505.09min - 5679.4max) Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4456 (4349.72min - 4455.83max) Points -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1537 - 6271, n=149, last 2 years)
3576 Points -37%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
3505 (3470.41min - 3505.08max) Points -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
3333 (3034.67min - 3332.5max) Points -41%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
343 Points +4%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
336 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (317 - 343, n=12)
336 Points +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
331 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
318 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
311 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
310 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 343, n=146, last 2 years)
285 Points -14%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (80 - 517, n=140, last 2 years)
164.4 Seconds * -77%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
159 Seconds * -71%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
140 Seconds * -51%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * -22%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (82 - 116, n=12)
94.5 Seconds * -2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
93 Seconds *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
87 Seconds * +6%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
86 Seconds * +8%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
142348 MIPS +27%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
122818 MIPS +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (99248 - 124155, n=12)
116054 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115695 MIPS +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
112410 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 148086, n=144, last 2 years)
87096 MIPS -23%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
83714 MIPS -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
69676 MIPS -38%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
7061 MIPS +6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
7027 MIPS +5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7018 MIPS +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (6186 - 7149, n=12)
6862 MIPS +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6669 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7573, n=144, last 2 years)
6344 MIPS -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
6252 MIPS -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
6136 MIPS -8%
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
21668 Points +12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (16033 - 21668, n=13)
19589 Points +2%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
19563 Points +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
19299 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17559 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
17207 Points -11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15671 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 22104, n=133, last 2 years)
14980 Points -22%
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
3230 Points +6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3158 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2917 - 3160, n=13)
3076 Points +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
3046 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2964 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2942 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2923 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3219, n=133, last 2 years)
2723 Points -11%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
25855 Points +16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (19105 - 25855, n=12)
23420 Points +5%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
22218 Points
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
21890 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19372 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
15818 Points -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 27010, n=143, last 2 years)
15681 Points -29%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
15407 Points -31%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2415 Points +9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2292 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (2034 - 2292, n=12)
2221 Points 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2214 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2136 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2131 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2108 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=143, last 2 years)
1952 Points -12%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
42.6 fps +18%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
41.2 fps +14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (32.6 - 43.8, n=12)
39 fps +8%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
36 fps
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps -16%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
28.7 fps -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
25.9 fps -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (7.7 - 44.3, n=144, last 2 years)
25.2 fps -30%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
48.6 s * -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=142, last 2 years)
47.7 s * -18%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
47.5 s * -17%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
46.8 s * -16%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (36.9 - 62.1, n=12)
44.8 s * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
42.8 s * -6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
41.3 s * -2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
40.46 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3551 - 0.759, n=145, last 2 years)
0.433 sec * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
0.4312 sec * -0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.43 sec *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=12)
0.4114 sec * +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
0.3979 sec * +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
0.3943 sec * +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3789 sec * +12%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
0.3555 sec * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
5679 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
286 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
331 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
14307 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
854 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2216 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
36329 Points
Help
Performance Rating
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97.2 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
76.9 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
72.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
 
71.7 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
61 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
59.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
53.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
48.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
80700 KRay/s +112%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
39458 KRay/s +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
38066 KRay/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
37324 KRay/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (29330 - 39895, n=11)
36469 KRay/s -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
25682 KRay/s -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (7192 - 85542, n=143, last 2 years)
25570 KRay/s -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
23492 KRay/s -38%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
229894 Points +22%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
194867 Points +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
189130 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (140254 - 198802, n=11)
181394 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
142039 Points -25%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
127908 Points -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (35040 - 252486, n=143, last 2 years)
117670 Points -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
116017 Points -39%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9653 MB/s +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9482 MB/s +5%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9025 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (6998 - 9734, n=11)
8810 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6188 MB/s -31%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
5824 MB/s -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (1728 - 10389, n=143, last 2 years)
5353 MB/s -41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
5206 MB/s -42%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
157576 Points +16%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
139608 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138473 Points +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
135378 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (113887 - 140695, n=11)
133532 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=143, last 2 years)
117254 Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
88891 Points -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
64720 Points -52%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
32533 Points +141%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
19115 Points +41%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15857 Points +17%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
14112 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (5020 - 33636, n=143, last 2 years)
13963 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (11172 - 14415, n=11)
13553 Points 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
13522 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
9089 Points -33%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
121952 Points +24%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
104057 Points +5%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
98724 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (72596 - 104057, n=11)
95211 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
75107 Points -24%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
64134 Points -35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
61884 Points -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (17585 - 134044, n=143, last 2 years)
60244 Points -39%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
161318 MB/s +24%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
134920 MB/s +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
129745 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (107858 - 136847, n=11)
128668 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
122937 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=143, last 2 years)
109781 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82547 MB/s -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
79949 MB/s -38%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2504 MB/s +21%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2220 MB/s +7%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
2076 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (1757 - 2263, n=11)
2073 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1863 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
1514 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2531, n=143, last 2 years)
1436 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
1233 MB/s -41%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
41572 KRay/s +102%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
21372 KRay/s +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
20602 KRay/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
20284 KRay/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (14847 - 21372, n=11)
19546 KRay/s -5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
13993 KRay/s -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (3856 - 45446, n=143, last 2 years)
13719 KRay/s -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
12887 KRay/s -37%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
58622 MPixel/s +22%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
56601 MPixel/s +17%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
51417 MPixel/s +7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (47726 - 56613, n=11)
51412 MPixel/s +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
49616 MPixel/s +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
48187 MPixel/s
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
42448 MPixel/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 62274, n=143, last 2 years)
41311 MPixel/s -14%

系统性能

在 PCMark 10 中,Master 的表现略低于其所安装硬件的平均水平,但在 CrossMark 中却能弥补这一微小的劣势。

不过,系统并不总是感觉完全流畅。不过值得庆幸的是,BIOS 和 GiMate 更新至少修复了许多问题(gif 滞后、窗口短暂冻结等)。

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
9402 Points +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
8864 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (8241 - 9032, n=7)
8662 Points +5%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
8623 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8401 Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
8254 Points 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
8241 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=130, last 2 years)
7998 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
11271 Points +13%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
10966 Points +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (9994 - 11369, n=7)
10949 Points +10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10915 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years)
10798 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
10717 Points +7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
10626 Points +6%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
9994 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
11309 Points +22%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11150 Points +20%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
10601 Points +14%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
10341 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=130, last 2 years)
9921 Points +7%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
9444 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (9122 - 9515, n=7)
9309 Points 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
9300 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
18874 Points +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (15507 - 19227, n=7)
17344 Points +6%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
16802 Points +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
16344 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
15593 Points -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
13889 Points -15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
13219 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (7440 - 19351, n=130, last 2 years)
13132 Points -20%
CrossMark / Overall
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
2259 Points 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2253 Points
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2221 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (1995 - 2282, n=7)
2194 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2149 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2064 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=112, last 2 years)
1939 Points -14%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2106 Points
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2025 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (1847 - 2119, n=7)
2021 Points -4%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
2014 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2007 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1918 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=112, last 2 years)
1830 Points -13%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
2661 Points +9%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2606 Points +6%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (2285 - 2612, n=7)
2511 Points +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2452 Points
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2418 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2416 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2729, n=112, last 2 years)
2148 Points -12%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2139 Points
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
1951 Points -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (1673 - 2181, n=7)
1878 Points -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1851 Points -13%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1813 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=112, last 2 years)
1711 Points -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1604 Points -25%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
346 Points 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
346 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (315 - 359, n=7)
341 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
333 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
330 Points -5%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
324 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
321 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=124, last 2 years)
309 Points -11%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
335 Points +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
333 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (317 - 337, n=6)
332 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
311 Points -7%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
297.6 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 341, n=112, last 2 years)
274 Points -18%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
268 Points -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming
  (397 - 674, n=134, last 2 years)
489 ms * -19%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
450 ms * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
450 ms * -9%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
429 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (404 - 420, n=7)
412 ms * -0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
411 ms *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
409 ms * -0%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, R9 9955HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
402 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8241 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97515 MB/s +28%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
93640 MB/s +23%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
84432 MB/s +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (74558 - 86978, n=11)
81710 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
78799 MB/s +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
75982 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 - 97515, n=143, last 2 years)
68334 MB/s -10%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
62538 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
102937 MB/s +25%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (74094 - 97151, n=11)
87360 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86387 MB/s +5%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
86194 MB/s +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82625 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
78309 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (22956 - 103347, n=143, last 2 years)
71268 MB/s -14%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
65957 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103860 MB/s +42%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
82198 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (72929 - 85648, n=11)
79200 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
75421 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
75293 MB/s +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
73095 MB/s
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
71277 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (22297 - 108954, n=143, last 2 years)
70594 MB/s -3%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
128.7 ns * -15%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
111.9 ns *
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  (105.8 - 125.1, n=11)
111.9 ns * -0%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
108.9 ns * +3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103.6 ns * +7%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
102.6 ns * +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=143, last 2 years)
98.6 ns * +12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * +25%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在测试过程中,我们一启动 LatencyMon 就出现了第一次延迟。在启动浏览器和打开多个标签页时,这些延迟都有所增加。在播放 4K/60 fps 的 YouTube 视频时,也出现了延迟和 10 帧掉帧现象。iGPU 几乎以 50% 的容量运行。

YouTube 测试
YouTube 测试
LatencyMon main
LatencyMon main
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
3220.2 μs * -97%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1637.7 μs *
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1389.7 μs * +15%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
810 μs * +51%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
492.6 μs * +70%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Aorus 安装了两块金士顿 NVMe 固态硬盘,每块的存储容量为 1 TB,因此有足够的空间用于游戏和应用程序。在我们的性能对比中,存储设备在竞争对手中排名居中,只有 Schenker Neo 16 的固态硬盘可以与之媲美。 申克 Neo 16要快得多。Aorus 的连续性能非常稳定。

CrystalDiskMark 6
CrystalDiskMark 6
AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘
AS SSD 复制
AS SSD 复制
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4734 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3906 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 839 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 754 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 66.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 306 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2802 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1665 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample -11!
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
96.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
70.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
69.8 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
65.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63.9 pt
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
58.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
56.6 pt
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
 
55.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
6813 (6793.93min - 6813.23max) MB/s +108%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
3799 (23.02min - 3799.36max) MB/s +16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3795 (3693.04min - 3794.8max) MB/s +16%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3790 (2816.71min - 3789.94max) MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (281 - 7663, n=126, last 2 years)
3452 MB/s +6%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3268 (3226.52min - 3267.96max) MB/s
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (1243 - 3327, n=13)
2651 MB/s -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1607 (236.92min - 1606.84max) MB/s -51%
seq write
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
9459 (9400.56min - 9458.53max) MB/s +142%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
4437 (4373.88min - 4437.36max) MB/s +14%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3906 (3851.27min - 3906.37max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=126, last 2 years)
3859 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3794 (3745.51min - 3793.5max) MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
3794 (3585.08min - 3793.54max) MB/s -3%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (977 - 3913, n=13)
3501 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3362 (2028.5min - 3361.51max) MB/s -14%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
14592 (13568.5min - 14592.4max) MB/s +204%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
12470 (11207.2min - 12469.7max) MB/s +160%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
6780 (5762.77min - 6780.16max) MB/s +41%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6673 (5801.28min - 6672.72max) MB/s +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 15056, n=126, last 2 years)
6538 MB/s +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
6278 (5683.91min - 6278.45max) MB/s +31%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
4799 (4213.14min - 4799.33max) MB/s
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (1754 - 4821, n=13)
4543 MB/s -5%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
13523 (13485.1min - 13523.5max) MB/s +246%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
8696 (8611.54min - 8696.26max) MB/s +123%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
5861 (4855.26min - 5860.72max) MB/s +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 13519, n=126, last 2 years)
5115 MB/s +31%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4936 (4909.47min - 4936.28max) MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
4844 (4270.43min - 4843.96max) MB/s +24%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3905 (3856.71min - 3905.27max) MB/s
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (982 - 3927, n=13)
3632 MB/s -7%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
83.6 (83.37min - 83.63max) MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
78.7 (77.61min - 78.69max) MB/s +15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
71.4 (66.19min - 71.35max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
69.2 (68.61min - 69.17max) MB/s +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
68.4 (66.54min - 68.38max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (32.9 - 95.9, n=126, last 2 years)
67.3 MB/s -2%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
63.4 (62.2min - 63.4max) MB/s -7%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (44.9 - 81.1, n=13)
62.6 MB/s -8%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
317 (306.21min - 316.5max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
265 (258.55min - 264.55max) MB/s -16%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
246 (238.03min - 245.99max) MB/s -22%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (81 - 435, n=13)
227 MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=126, last 2 years)
217 MB/s -32%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
205 (202.97min - 204.75max) MB/s -35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
165.3 (162.66min - 165.27max) MB/s -48%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
136.4 (134.95min - 136.4max) MB/s -57%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
5634 (5572.88min - 5634.3max) MB/s +101%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3726 (3704.12min - 3725.6max) MB/s +33%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3189 (3182.48min - 3189.1max) MB/s +14%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2809 (2804.8min - 2809.03max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=126, last 2 years)
2497 MB/s -11%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (434 - 2980, n=13)
1997 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
848 (703.36min - 848.14max) MB/s -70%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
746 (519.37min - 746.01max) MB/s -73%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3711 (3674.85min - 3711.4max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3548 (3533.85min - 3548.33max) MB/s -4%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
3485 (3415.85min - 3484.81max) MB/s -6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2210 (729.15min - 2210.24max) MB/s -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 5588, n=126, last 2 years)
2042 MB/s -45%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (203 - 3784, n=13)
1918 MB/s -48%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
456 (68.45min - 456.36max) MB/s -88%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
284 (254.39min - 283.58max) MB/s -92%
AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
7379 Points +10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7040 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=123, last 2 years)
6768 Points +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
6720 Points
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (1166 - 8405, n=13)
5520 Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
4945 Points -26%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
4764 Points -29%
Score Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
3215 Points +16%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2848 Points +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2761 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=123, last 2 years)
2373 Points -14%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (571 - 2901, n=13)
1878 Points -32%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1653 Points -40%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1569 Points -43%
Score Write
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=123, last 2 years)
3251 Points +26%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2766 Points +7%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (331 - 4040, n=13)
2714 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2635 Points +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2588 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2571 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
2267 Points -12%
Seq Read
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
5595 MB/s +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 9890, n=123, last 2 years)
5105 MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
5081 MB/s +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
4884 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4371 MB/s +7%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
4092 MB/s
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (1474 - 4193, n=13)
3585 MB/s -12%
Seq Write
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
5305 MB/s +73%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
4160 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 9486, n=123, last 2 years)
3852 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3791 MB/s +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
3282 MB/s +7%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3060 MB/s
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (648 - 3688, n=13)
2659 MB/s -13%
4K Read
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
85 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
72.1 MB/s -15%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (41.2 - 89.2, n=13)
70.1 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=123, last 2 years)
65.7 MB/s -23%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
65.1 MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
64.4 MB/s -24%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
61.1 MB/s -28%
4K Write
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
271 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
230 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
217 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.4 - 512, n=123, last 2 years)
215 MB/s -21%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (82.5 - 271, n=13)
213 MB/s -21%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
189.8 MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
160.6 MB/s -41%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
2642 MB/s +17%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2350 MB/s +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2266 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3630, n=123, last 2 years)
1789 MB/s -21%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (382 - 2409, n=13)
1449 MB/s -36%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1029 MB/s -55%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
1009 MB/s -55%
4K-64 Write
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=123, last 2 years)
2654 MB/s +32%
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (183.4 - 3492, n=13)
2234 MB/s +11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2226 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
2090 MB/s +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2011 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
1926 MB/s -4%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
1546 MB/s -23%
Access Time Read
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
0.092 ms *
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (0.036 - 0.127, n=13)
0.07608 ms * +17%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
0.067 ms * +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=122, last 2 years)
0.05642 ms * +39%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
0.051 ms * +45%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
0.035 ms * +62%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.033 ms * +64%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=123, last 2 years)
0.0491 ms * -23%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
0.04 ms *
Average Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
  (0.02 - 0.06, n=13)
0.03223 ms * +19%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.025 ms * +37%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
0.021 ms * +47%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
WD PC SN8000S 2TB
0.019 ms * +52%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
0.019 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

06251250187525003125375043755000562562506875750081258750937510000106251125011875Tooltip
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4793 (4467.44-4803.95)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6269 (5613.96-6306.73)
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 SSSTC CA6-8D2048; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6908 (5460.14-6935.25)
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX WD PC SN8000S 2TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12242 (10589.57-12452.94)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5414 (3853.78-6701.45)

图形处理器性能

新的 RTX 5090是目前 Nvidia 的旗舰产品,当然也是这款笔记本价格昂贵的主要原因。

在 3DMarks 合成测试中,Master 16 "仅 "与 雷蛇刀锋 16游戏模式下 "仅 "与雷蛇刀锋 16 不相上下,而在 Zephyrus G16.总体而言,我们注意到其性能达到了预期水平。

在运行游戏时,Aorus Master 16 的性能比 Blade 和 Zephyrus 高出约 20 个百分点。然而,我们似乎无法绕过 XMG Neo 16夺得性能桂冠。例如,当我们在 QHD 下使用 DLSS 4 和四倍帧生成器运行《毁灭战士:黑暗时代》时,几乎耗尽了 OLED 240 Hz 的原生刷新率。在 QHD 模式下,稍高的延迟几乎无法察觉。

平衡模式下,运行《赛博朋克 2077》时只损失了几帧;在配备静音风扇的节能模式下,性能下降了约 20%,但对于大多数游戏来说仍然完全够用,而且听起来也很舒服。

当我们拔掉插头时,3D 应用程序只有在更改上述选项后才能运行。重新运行Fire Strike 发现,3D 性能下降了约 41%。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
Steel Nomad
Steel Nomad
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
100 pt
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
 
94.7 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
93.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 -1!
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
93.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
92.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
92.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
85.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
59.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
73596 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
71866 Points +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
70815 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
70760 Points 0%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (54052 - 76300, n=12)
68735 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
63549 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
61156 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (10741 - 76300, n=137, last 2 years)
46114 Points -35%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
54791 Points +16%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (42516 - 62849, n=13)
52466 Points +12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
52065 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
49297 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
49153 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
48891 Points +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
47034 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 62849, n=149, last 2 years)
33158 Points -30%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
25040 Points +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
24563 Points
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (19216 - 25129, n=13)
23684 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
23600 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
23003 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
22082 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
21571 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 25040, n=145, last 2 years)
14019 Points -43%
Steel Nomad Score
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6151 Points +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
6008 Points +3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (4791 - 6163, n=9)
5851 Points 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5828 Points
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
5652 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5156 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1522 - 6163, n=40, last 2 years)
3692 Points -37%
3DMark 11 Performance
49578 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
69384 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
36506 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
22835 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
5828 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=137, last 2 years)
20.3 Seconds * -85%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
15 Seconds * -36%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
10 Seconds * +9%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
13 Seconds * -18%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (9 - 18, n=12)
12.3 Seconds * -12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12 Seconds * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
12 Seconds * -9%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
11 Seconds * -0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
11 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (15 - 110, n=138, last 2 years)
34.3 Seconds * -114%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
19 Seconds * -19%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (15 - 37, n=10)
18.7 Seconds * -17%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
18 Seconds * -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
18 Seconds * -13%
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
16 Seconds * -0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
16 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (122 - 962, n=143, last 2 years)
281 Seconds * -89%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
259 Seconds * -74%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
210 Seconds * -41%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
202 Seconds * -36%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (123 - 259, n=12)
160.1 Seconds * -7%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
149 Seconds *
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
137 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
125 Seconds * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
100 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
92.8 pt
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
90.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
90.6 pt
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
71.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.1 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
156.2 (125.7min, 114.4P1) fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
154.8 (123.7min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
153.6 (124.2min) fps +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
144.3 (118.2min) fps +5%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
137.5 (102min) fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
105.3 (74.7min) fps -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 164, n=106, last 2 years)
97.3 fps -29%
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
211.5 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
201 fps +4%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
194 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
193.3 fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
180.3 fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
162 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 246, n=73, last 2 years)
130.4 fps -33%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
164.1 (2.25min, 125P1) fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
164.1 (3.7min, 100P1) fps +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
162.8 (3.33min, 111.1P1) fps +16%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
140.9 (3.56min, 90.9P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
121.6 (8.28min, 83.3P1) fps -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 186.9, n=122, last 2 years)
118.3 fps -16%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
210 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
203 fps +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
201 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
194.6 fps -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
189.6 fps -6%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
147.4 fps -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 212, n=139, last 2 years)
126.5 fps -37%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
434 (21.5min, 322P1) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
434 (79.1min, 306P1) fps +6%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
408 (11.4min, 274P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
375 (147.7min, 218P1) fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
367 (164.3min, 218P1) fps -10%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
319 (126.4min, 227P1) fps -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 453, n=133, last 2 years)
242 fps -41%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
188.9 (155.7min) fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
185.6 (154.7min) fps +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
175.5 (149.8min) fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
167.2 (136.1min) fps 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
166.4 (141.2min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 248, n=142, last 2 years)
152.3 fps -8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
137.1 (113.2min) fps -18%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
124.5 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
119.5 fps +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
115.9 fps +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
113.2 fps
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
110.6 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.4 - 166.2, n=145, last 2 years)
104.9 fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
85.2 fps -25%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
224 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (192 - 224, n=3)
212 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
192 fps -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 224, n=98, last 2 years)
127.8 fps -43%
F1 24
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
154.9 (74min, 95P1) fps +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
144.2 (73min, 90P1) fps +12%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (107.5 - 158.3, n=12)
144.2 fps +12%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
133 (55min, 67P1) fps +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
129 fps
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
127.5 (74min, 89P1) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (54.1 - 157.8, n=33, last 2 years)
107.6 fps -17%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
103.3 (73min, 80P1) fps +15%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (72.5 - 105.5, n=13)
98 fps +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97.8 (70min, 75P1) fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
94.9 (50min, 66P1) fps +5%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
90 fps
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
84.5 (66min, 66P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (36.7 - 105, n=31, last 2 years)
76.3 fps -15%
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (48.8 - 54.2, n=8)
51 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
50.5 (42min, 42P1) fps +1%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
50 fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
48.8 (41min, 40P1) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.5 - 52, n=14, last 2 years)
41.5 fps -17%
Black Myth: Wukong
1920x1080 cinematic TSR 100
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
74 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (57 - 74, n=3)
64.7 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
58 (50min) fps -22%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
57 (15min, 51P1) fps -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 74, n=12, last 2 years)
52.1 fps -30%
2560x1440 cinematic TSR 100
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
47 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (44 - 48, n=3)
46.3 fps -1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
44 (38min, 40P1) fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
44 (39min) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 48, n=12, last 2 years)
39.6 fps -16%
3840x2160 cinematic TSR 100
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (27 - 33, n=3)
29.3 fps +5%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
28 fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
27 (22min, 25P1) fps -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
26 (21min) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 33, n=11, last 2 years)
23.7 fps -15%
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle
1920x1080 Very Ultra Preset
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
132 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
129.2 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
128.6 fps -3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (87.7 - 142.3, n=11)
126.6 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (87.7 - 142.3, n=18, last 2 years)
122 fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
121.9 fps -8%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
119.6 (77.3P0.1, 85.6P1) fps -9%
2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
102.4 fps 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
102 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (66.1 - 115.9, n=13)
101.8 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
101.3 fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
99.1 fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
97.3 (65.6P0.1, 75.1P1) fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.1 - 115.9, n=19, last 2 years)
96.4 fps -5%
3840x2160 Very Ultra Preset
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
66.6 fps
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (48.2 - 70.8, n=10)
64.4 fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
63.5 fps -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
63.2 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
62.3 (50.6P0.1, 52.7P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (43.1 - 68.6, n=15, last 2 years)
60.3 fps -9%
Monster Hunter Wilds
1920x1080 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
90 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
88.3 fps +9%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (66.4 - 94.6, n=9)
83.5 fps +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
80.82 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (65.7 - 90, n=16, last 2 years)
80.3 fps -1%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
68.06 fps -16%
2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
73.8 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
73.2 fps +4%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (54 - 76.4, n=9)
70.6 fps 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
70.26 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 74.7, n=16, last 2 years)
67.4 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
65.61 fps -7%
3840x2160 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
46.9 fps +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
46 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
45.2 fps -2%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (33.4 - 48.5, n=9)
45.2 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
44.07 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.4 - 47.6, n=16, last 2 years)
42.9 fps -7%
Assassin's Creed Shadows
1920x1080 Ultra High
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
70 fps +11%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (44 - 76, n=10)
65.7 fps +4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
64 (27min, 35P0.1, 49P1) fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
64 (43min) fps +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
63 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (40 - 70, n=21, last 2 years)
59.1 fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
58 fps -8%
2560x1440 Ultra High
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
56 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
55 (41min) fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
55 fps -2%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (37 - 59, n=11)
53.8 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
50 (31min, 33P0.1, 39P1) fps -11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
50 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (30 - 59, n=22, last 2 years)
49.2 fps -12%
3840x2160 Ultra High
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
41 fps +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
40 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
40 (28min) fps 0%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (35 - 42, n=8)
39.3 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 41, n=15, last 2 years)
35.6 fps -11%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
35 (16min, 22P0.1, 27P1) fps -12%
Alan Wake 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
129.7 fps +37%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
124.2 fps +31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
120.6 fps +27%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (83 - 129.7, n=10)
114.5 fps +21%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
112.6 fps +19%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
95.2 (19.5P0.1, 43.9P1) fps 0%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
95 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (17.1 - 129.7, n=35, last 2 years)
88.4 fps -7%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
88.5 fps +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
83.8 fps +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
83.4 fps +3%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (57.6 - 88.8, n=12)
82.6 fps +2%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
81.1 fps
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
76.7 (16.3P0.1, 33P1) fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
76.5 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.5 - 88.5, n=32, last 2 years)
70.5 fps -13%
3840x2160 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
46.8 fps +9%
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
  (33.4 - 47.7, n=9)
44.4 fps +3%
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
43.1 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
43.1 fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
43 (12.9P0.1, 25.7P1) fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.3 - 46.8, n=19, last 2 years)
39 fps -10%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø135 (123.2-138.2)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø148.8 (139-150.3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø110 (100.1-112)
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø107.9 (97.6-110.3)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø144.4 (132.4-147.8)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop: Ø128.4 (121.7-130.5)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop: Ø140.9 (134-145)
lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD4K DLSS4K
GTA V (2015) 182 178 180.5 140.9 96.9 173.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 224 185 114
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 216 189.4 179.2 166.4 168.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 233 232 201 160.5 103.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 161.3 143.9 113.2 104.3
Strange Brigade (2018) 511 426 425 408 287 177.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 250 199 197 194 151 129 85.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 154.7 154.5 147 137.5 118.4 109.7 76.9 52.7
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 95 81.1 43.1
F1 24 (2024) 240 260 252 129 90 82 50
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) 74 67 47 28
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) 132 118 102 66.6
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) 80.82 78.96 70.26 61.19 46
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) 63 65 56 53 40
Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) 133.5 117.3 108.4 105.3 102.3 77 63 43.3

排放与能源 - 怠速消耗仍然过高

噪音排放

怠速运转时,笔记本电脑的风扇基本处于关闭状态,即使在负载一段时间后,风扇也会很快分阶段恢复平静--非常好!在游戏等高负载情况下,风扇转速会持续增加。但最终,在选择游戏模式的测试中,风扇的声音变得很大,甚至比大多数竞争对手都大;在游戏和压力测试时,我们测得的风扇声音略低于 60 分贝。注:在下表中,我们使用平衡配置文件对 Master 18 进行了测试。

场景 "中的可选风扇设置所占比例最大。性能曲线显示,性能风扇(游戏)和普通风扇(平衡)之间的差异微乎其微(见下图)。更安静的风扇配置文件 "安静风扇"只能在节能模式下选择。不过,从这里也可以看出,所有风扇配置文件最终都会在一定温度下达到最大转速,因此如果达到临界温度,静音风扇在较长时间的游戏过程中也会变得同样响亮。

性能风扇
性能风扇
普通风扇
普通风扇
静音风扇
静音风扇

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 23 / 23 dB(A)
Load
40.46 / 59.75 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.430.236.42535.931.535.93141.132.141.14031.232.431.25029.83329.86331.922.531.98027.81427.810030.115.830.11252913.82916029.513.429.520031.715.831.725035.418.435.431535.719.235.740037.611.637.650039.49.639.463043.87.843.880043.9843.9100044.68.444.6125049.58.349.5160050.49.250.4200048.39.648.325004810.648315049.810.849.8400048.811.448.850004811.64863004711.947800048.412.348.41000044.21344.21250039.812.139.81600035.812.235.8SPL59.823.359.8N13.30.513.3median 43.9median 11.6median 43.9Delta72.47hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
Noise
-8%
-8%
-9%
-8%
5%
off / environment *
23
24
-4%
24.1
-5%
23.8
-3%
24
-4%
22.9
-0%
Idle Minimum *
23
26
-13%
24.1
-5%
29
-26%
24
-4%
22.9
-0%
Idle Average *
23
26
-13%
30.6
-33%
29
-26%
30.1
-31%
22.9
-0%
Idle Maximum *
23
26
-13%
30.6
-33%
29
-26%
30.1
-31%
26.3
-14%
Load Average *
40.46
52.4
-30%
45.5
-12%
40.5
-0%
41.1
-2%
27.8
31%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
59.75
55.4
7%
48.2
19%
53.6
10%
54.2
9%
54.2
9%
Load Maximum *
59.75
55.4
7%
53.4
11%
53.6
10%
54.2
9%
53.9
10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

笔记本电脑的散热系统声音相当响亮,可以很好地控制温度。即使在紧张状态下,我们在顶部测得的最高温度为 39 °C,中心温度最高,而 WASD 键则保持相当低的温度。在底部,Aorus 的最高温度为 51 °C,略高于部分竞争对手。

空闲时,由于设备的风扇大多处于关闭状态,温度比许多竞争对手都要高一些。

Max. Load
 32 °C36 °C30 °C 
 38 °C39 °C34 °C 
 26 °C27 °C24 °C 
Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 31.8 °C
43 °C51 °C42 °C
29 °C31 °C32 °C
26 °C30 °C26 °C
Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  57 °C | Room Temperature 19.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
压力顶
压力顶
压力电源
压力电源
压力底
压力底
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
Heat
8%
3%
2%
14%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
39
47.8
-23%
48.3
-24%
44.2
-13%
39.6
-2%
42.6
-9%
Maximum Bottom *
51
46.7
8%
53.3
-5%
48.1
6%
49.7
3%
41.2
19%
Idle Upper Side *
36
28.4
21%
28.3
21%
33
8%
26.3
27%
32.6
9%
Idle Bottom *
38
28.9
24%
30.3
20%
36.1
5%
27.3
28%
32.4
15%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

我们只看到了其中的两位发言者
我们只看到了其中的两位发言者

官方说明中提到了四个 2 瓦扬声器。测试时打开机箱,我们只能看到两个标准立体声扬声器,但其中可能还集成了另一对扬声器。无论如何,它们的音量并不是很大。中音和高音非常均衡,甚至还有一些低音,当然低音会有所减弱。3.5 毫米耳机插孔可用于外接音频设备。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.530.231.52539.731.539.73138.932.138.94025.532.425.55029.53329.56331.622.531.68034.81434.810033.515.833.512538.613.838.616047.713.447.720053.115.853.12505918.45931559.119.259.140060.711.660.750063.99.663.963066.87.866.880066866100064.78.464.7125061.18.361.1160064.19.264.1200063.39.663.3250062.810.662.8315059.710.859.7400061.111.461.1500064.511.664.5630065.311.965.3800062.912.362.91000061.11361.11250056.612.156.61600046.612.246.6SPL75.423.375.4N38.50.538.5median 61.1median 11.6median 61.1Delta5.92.45.944.243.530.234.23232.228.233.424.832.424.237.222.238.819.244.518.549.21849.917.357.518.259.815.966.312.770.311.772.310.977.210.376.510.569.810.767.810.668.81169.311.370.811.967.912.269.112.162.712.559.112.560.612.760.512.855.411.955.324.182.10.553.7median 12.2median 66.32.16.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus MASTER 16 AM6HRazer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.36 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量

与 Master 18 一样,它在空闲模式下的功耗仍然过高。这也可能是由于当前的 Nvidia 驱动程序造成的;多款 Blackwell 笔记本电脑仍存在这方面的问题,可能很快就会通过优化驱动程序来解决。

在负载情况下,它的功耗与 Scar 18 或 Master 18 差不多。我们测量到,16.5 x 7.5 x 2.6 厘米的 330 瓦电源装置的短期负载峰值高达 325 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 25 / 29.4 / 31 Watt
Load midlight 109 / 325 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
37%
-11%
14%
-22%
23%
Idle Minimum *
25
11.8
53%
10.9
56%
22.5
10%
10.8
57%
28.5
-14%
Idle Average *
29.4
15.1
49%
13.5
54%
32.2
-10%
17.7
40%
38.8
-32%
Idle Maximum *
31
15.8
49%
13.7
56%
34.3
-11%
18.8
39%
45.6
-47%
Load Average *
109
165.3
-52%
120.2
-10%
169.3
-55%
139.4
-28%
132.2
-21%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
290
296
-2%
178.2
39%
294
-1%
295
-2%
318
-10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
292
289
1%
177.6
39%
288
1%
291
-0%
319
-9%
Load Maximum *
325
415.5
-28%
246.1
24%
371.5
-14%
359.3
-11%
384
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø304 (232.29-325.35)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø28.4 (25.526-37.059)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø290 (276.59-299.27)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø224 (205.11-236.61)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø217 (213.16-219.67)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø209 (54.77-226.18)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø219 (214.52-223.72)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.6 (20.908-29.931)
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø282 (278.27-287.01)

运行时间

Aorus 的电池容量为 99 Wh。在 WLAN 和视频测试中,该设备的运行时间约为 6 小时。如果 Nvidia 和制造商能解决空闲时耗电量高的问题,Aorus 仍有一定的潜力。目前的 BIOS 更新应该可以改善这一状况。在我们的负载测试中,BatteryEater 工具在经典测试中运行良好,即使在电池模式下也能很好地利用硬件。测试在 110 分钟后结束。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
6h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 50min
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.8 Wh
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10
Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
28%
45%
-4%
29%
-38%
1%
H.264
346
460
33%
592
71%
658
90%
WiFi v1.3
404
572
42%
475
18%
388
-4%
469
16%
323
-20%
Load
110
121
10%
88
-20%
48
-56%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
71
48

Notebookcheck 总评分

Aorus Master 16 是一款功能非常强大的游戏笔记本电脑,但在负载情况下声音也相当大,几乎所有游戏都能流畅运行,甚至是 4K 游戏。它还拥有非常出色的 OLED 显示屏,但目前价格仍然很高。

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H - 05/09/2025 v8
Christian Hintze

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
71 / 80 → 89%
Weight
60 / 10-68 → 86%
Battery
69 / 95 → 73%
Display
84%
Games Performance
94%
Application Performance
93%
Temperature
88 / 95 → 92%
Noise
60 / 90 → 67%
Audio
78%
Camera
35 / 75 → 47%
Average
63%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
67.2%
Repairability
55%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 39.1%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 搭载 RTX 5090 和 240 Hz OLED,与 ROG、Legion 等公司竞争 - 技嘉 Aorus Master 16 游戏笔记本评测
Christian Hintze, 2025-06- 3 (Update: 2025-06- 3)