
搭载 RTX 5090 和 240 Hz OLED,与 ROG、Legion 等公司竞争 - 技嘉 Aorus Master 16 游戏笔记本评测
谁是师傅,谁是徒弟?
我们终于拿到了精通测试的 Aorus Master 16,它配备了 RTX 5090、OLED 显示屏、Thunderbolt 5、PCIe 5.0 和 WiFi 7。这就是售价 4300 美元的新性能之王?Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
评价:快速的 OLED 游戏机,但声音大、价格昂贵且未完全优化
由于配备了 RTX 5090,Aorus Master 16 成为了一款超级强劲的游戏笔记本电脑。它拥有 Thunderbolt 5 等现代连接技术,支持 Wi-Fi 7,风扇控制可根据负载调节转速,使游戏笔记本电脑在低负载时也能保持安静。
另一方面,它的风扇在较高负载下的音量非常大,几乎达到 60 分贝。尽管如此,XMG Neo 16 的性能还是不错的,但它并没有打破任何记录。 XMG Neo 16和 联想Legion Pro 7i更快。定期的 BIOS 和 GiMate 更新已经解决了最初的问题和延迟。总体而言,虽然在制造质量(关键词:左键点击触摸板)和驱动程序优化方面仍有一些改进的余地,但买家还是以高价买到了一台功能非常强大的 OLED 游戏笔记本电脑。
Pros
Cons
Aorus 在 2025 年的 CES 上展示了新的 Master 系列,我们终于有机会对其进行测试。配备 RTX 5090 的 16 英寸笔记本电脑的高端型号承诺总 TDP 高达 230 瓦(55 + 175 瓦),而 18 英寸版本而我们最近测试的 18 英寸版本的 TDP 甚至高达 270 瓦。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格 - RTX 5090 和 Core Ultra 9 275HX
外壳和连接性 - 功能丰富,结构合理
其 "Dark Tide"(黑色)配色的外壳主要由塑料制成,底部采用了有趣的结构,内部采用了 Aorus 的设计,外部配备了照明元素,包括一个 "徽标投影仪",可将 "Aorus "字样从显示屏底部中央投射到表面(如桌子)上。这款笔记本电脑的总体设计明显基于 Aorus 16X.
不过,Master 16 的厚度相当大,约为 30 毫米,而 Aorus 16X 的厚度仅为 25 毫米。 华硕 ROG Strix Scar 16和 XMG Neo 16 E25具有相似的尺寸,甚至更重。刀锋 刀锋 16和 Zephyrus G16当然,它们要薄得多,也轻得多。
该设备的外壳看起来相当稳定,扭动时几乎不会发出任何噪音。显示屏略有反弹,铰链可以更紧一些,最大开启角度约为 130 度。
遗憾的是,它的 FHD 网络摄像头拍摄出的照片并不美观,色彩偏差较大,并带有严重的蓝色色调。由于支持 Wi-Fi 7,其传输速率相当高。笔记本电脑的 micro SD 读卡器运行速度相当快。Master 16 配备了一个 Thunderbolt 5 接口和一个 Thunderbolt 4 接口,其他方面的配置也不错。插孔接口位于右前侧的位置并不理想。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 204, n=73, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=72, last 2 years) |

维护
可持续性
Aorus 没有提供任何有关笔记本电脑二氧化碳排放量的信息。其包装中的塑料含量不到 5%(包装盒手柄、笔记本电脑套、防尘布),其余部分由纸板制成。
输入设备 - 不算高端
显示屏 - 1600p OLED 显示屏,安装在 Master 16 中
Aorus 安装了反射式 1,600p OLED,刷新率为 240 Hz,DCI-P3 覆盖率为 100%,并支持 HDR 和 G-Sync。
在 SDR 模式下,当显示 100% 白色时,我们测得的平均亮度为 437 尼特,在 96% 时亮度非常均匀。在 APL 25 测试的 HDR 模式下,亮度甚至达到了 635 尼特。面板的闪烁频率高达 960 Hz,即使是敏感用户也不会感到不适。
当然,它的对比度也非常出色,这要归功于其极高的黑度,这是 OLED 面板的典型特征。当然,我们没有注意到任何背光渗色现象,只有纯粹的黑色。该面板几乎完全覆盖了 sRGB,甚至 Display-P3 和 AdobeRGB 也达到了 95% 左右。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 428 cd/m²
Contrast: 5438:1 (Black: 0.08 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85, calibrated: 2.03
ΔE Greyscale 3.11 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
94.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H ATNA60DL03-0 (SDC41AB), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | -3% | -1% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 95.3 | 99.9 5% | 96.1 1% | 99 4% | 99.1 4% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.8 | 100 1% | 99.9 1% | 100 1% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.1 | 96.9 3% | 85 -10% | 87.2 -7% | 95.6 2% |
Response Times | 25% | 22% | -1805% | 4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.24 ? | 0.22 8% | 0.2 ? 17% | 7.4 ? -2983% | 0.24 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.43 ? | 0.25 42% | 0.25 ? 42% | 10.4 ? -2319% | 0.4 ? 7% |
PWM Frequency | 960 | 960 | 960 ? | 20610 ? | 960 |
PWM Amplitude * | 47 | 44 6% | 100 -113% | ||
Screen | 16% | 18% | 38% | 60% | |
Brightness middle | 435 | 416 -4% | 391 -10% | 764 76% | 418 -4% |
Brightness | 437 | 418 -4% | 393 -10% | 747 71% | 420 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 96 0% | 98 2% | 93 -3% | 98 2% |
Black Level * | 0.08 | 0.1 -25% | 0.02 75% | ||
Contrast | 5438 | 7640 40% | 20900 284% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.42 | 1.6 34% | 1.2 50% | 1.2 50% | 1.07 56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.81 | 2.1 56% | 3.2 33% | 2.8 42% | 4.04 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.03 | 1.07 47% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.11 | 2.7 13% | 1.8 42% | 1.5 52% | 1.12 64% |
Gamma | 2.48 89% | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.29 96% |
CCT | 6270 104% | 6331 103% | 6493 100% | 6556 99% | 6417 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
14% | 12% /
14% | -589% /
-365% | 22% /
39% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.18 ms rise | |
↘ 0.25 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.12 ms rise | |
↘ 0.12 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz Amplitude: 47 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8429 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 非常稳定,但不是最高
Master 16 是一款真正的游戏笔记本电脑,而不仅仅是视觉效果(LED 灯带)。三种型号仅在 GPU 配置上有所不同。我们的顶级型号配备了 RTX 5090而 RTX 5080和 RTX 5070 Ti则是更多选择。
测试条件
GiMate 是笔记本电脑的控制中心。由于结构简单,主屏幕清晰明了,但在其他菜单部分就有些力不从心了。此外,GiMate 还需要优化,它的加载时间较长,CPU 负载也会有所降低。
总的来说,笔记本电脑的图形切换似乎存在一些问题。例如,在拔下插头时,我们被询问是否要关闭 dGPU 以节省能源,但即使我们说不,dGPU 也不再处于活动状态。在 GiMate 中,我们在 "场景"-"电源"-"AI Power Gear II "菜单中隐约发现,即使在游戏模式下,只要电池模式激活,dGPU 默认就会停用。我们将模式更改为 Optimus,并将其设置为 "游戏"配置文件的最高性能。只有这样,要求更高的 3D 应用程序才能在电池模式下正常运行。
事实上,默认情况下几乎不可能在游戏模式下运行(远离电源插座),这是开发人员的一个奇怪决定。此外,笔记本有时需要半分钟才能识别出我们已重新插入电源适配器。
在我们测试期间,BIOS 和 GiMate 的更新定期发布,大大改善了这些问题(如电源插头问题、延迟)。通过 GiMate 的实时更新,安装非常简单。
我们在基准测试中选择了游戏模式,并激活了人工智能增强功能。
处理器
其核心是Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX它拥有 24 个内核,主频为 2.1 至 5.4 GHz。这是一款高端笔记本电脑 CPU,集成了一个名为 AI Boost 的小型专用 NPU(拥有 13 个 TOPS)和一个拥有 4 个内核的小型英特尔显卡。
该 CPU 在所有测试中的表现都符合我们的预期,但相同的 CPU 在以下测试中速度更快 华硕 Strix Scar 18和 Neo 16而更薄的 Blade 16 和 Zephyrus G16 则更慢。
我们的 Cinebench R15 耐用性测试(Multi)显示性能非常稳定。笔记本电脑的最大功耗为 140 瓦。
在电池模式下,后者只有约 39 瓦,性能损失约为 50%,与节能模式类似。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30712 - 40970, n=12) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2126 - 2267, n=12) | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=146, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12257 - 16108, n=12) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (811 - 870, n=12) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=146, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4853 - 6271, n=12) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (317 - 343, n=12) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=146, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=140, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82 - 116, n=12) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (99248 - 124155, n=12) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6186 - 7149, n=12) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=13) | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=133, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2917 - 3160, n=13) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=133, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (19105 - 25855, n=12) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2034 - 2292, n=12) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=143, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (32.6 - 43.8, n=12) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=144, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (36.9 - 62.1, n=12) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=12) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (29330 - 39895, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (140254 - 198802, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6998 - 9734, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (113887 - 140695, n=11) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (11172 - 14415, n=11) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72596 - 104057, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=143, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (107858 - 136847, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1757 - 2263, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14847 - 21372, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (47726 - 56613, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62274, n=143, last 2 years) |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (8241 - 9032, n=7) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=130, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9994 - 11369, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=130, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9122 - 9515, n=7) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15507 - 19227, n=7) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=130, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1995 - 2282, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=112, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1847 - 2119, n=7) | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=112, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2285 - 2612, n=7) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=112, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1673 - 2181, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (315 - 359, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=124, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (317 - 337, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=112, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (404 - 420, n=7) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8241 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74558 - 86978, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=143, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74094 - 97151, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 103347, n=143, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72929 - 85648, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=143, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 125.1, n=11) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Aorus 安装了两块金士顿 NVMe 固态硬盘,每块的存储容量为 1 TB,因此有足够的空间用于游戏和应用程序。在我们的性能对比中,存储设备在竞争对手中排名居中,只有 Schenker Neo 16 的固态硬盘可以与之媲美。 申克 Neo 16要快得多。Aorus 的连续性能非常稳定。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
新的 RTX 5090是目前 Nvidia 的旗舰产品,当然也是这款笔记本价格昂贵的主要原因。
在 3DMarks 合成测试中,Master 16 "仅 "与 雷蛇刀锋 16在游戏模式下 "仅 "与雷蛇刀锋 16 不相上下,而在 Zephyrus G16.总体而言,我们注意到其性能达到了预期水平。
在运行游戏时,Aorus Master 16 的性能比 Blade 和 Zephyrus 高出约 20 个百分点。然而,我们似乎无法绕过 XMG Neo 16夺得性能桂冠。例如,当我们在 QHD 下使用 DLSS 4 和四倍帧生成器运行《毁灭战士:黑暗时代》时,几乎耗尽了 OLED 240 Hz 的原生刷新率。在 QHD 模式下,稍高的延迟几乎无法察觉。
在平衡模式下,运行《赛博朋克 2077》时只损失了几帧;在配备静音风扇的节能模式下,性能下降了约 20%,但对于大多数游戏来说仍然完全够用,而且听起来也很舒服。
当我们拔掉插头时,3D 应用程序只有在更改上述选项后才能运行。重新运行Fire Strike 发现,3D 性能下降了约 41%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 49578 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 69384 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 36506 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 22835 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 5828 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 164, n=106, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=122, last 2 years) |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (192 - 224, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 224, n=98, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 182 | 178 | 180.5 | 140.9 | 96.9 | 173.2 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 224 | 185 | 114 | |||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 216 | 189.4 | 179.2 | 166.4 | 168.6 | |||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 233 | 232 | 201 | 160.5 | 103.9 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 161.3 | 143.9 | 113.2 | 104.3 | ||||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 511 | 426 | 425 | 408 | 287 | 177.5 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 250 | 199 | 197 | 194 | 151 | 129 | 85.3 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 154.7 | 154.5 | 147 | 137.5 | 118.4 | 109.7 | 76.9 | 52.7 |
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 95 | 81.1 | 43.1 | |||||
F1 24 (2024) | 240 | 260 | 252 | 129 | 90 | 82 | 50 | |
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 74 | 67 | 47 | 28 | ||||
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 132 | 118 | 102 | 66.6 | ||||
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 80.82 | 78.96 | 70.26 | 61.19 | 46 | |||
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 63 | 65 | 56 | 53 | 40 | |||
Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) | 133.5 | 117.3 | 108.4 | 105.3 | 102.3 | 77 | 63 | 43.3 |
排放与能源 - 怠速消耗仍然过高
噪音排放
怠速运转时,笔记本电脑的风扇基本处于关闭状态,即使在负载一段时间后,风扇也会很快分阶段恢复平静--非常好!在游戏等高负载情况下,风扇转速会持续增加。但最终,在选择游戏模式的测试中,风扇的声音变得很大,甚至比大多数竞争对手都大;在游戏和压力测试时,我们测得的风扇声音略低于 60 分贝。注:在下表中,我们使用平衡配置文件对 Master 18 进行了测试。
场景 "中的可选风扇设置所占比例最大。性能曲线显示,性能风扇(游戏)和普通风扇(平衡)之间的差异微乎其微(见下图)。更安静的风扇配置文件 "安静风扇"只能在节能模式下选择。不过,从这里也可以看出,所有风扇配置文件最终都会在一定温度下达到最大转速,因此如果达到临界温度,静音风扇在较长时间的游戏过程中也会变得同样响亮。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 40.46 / 59.75 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -8% | -9% | -8% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 24 -4% | 24.1 -5% | 23.8 -3% | 24 -4% | 22.9 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 26 -13% | 24.1 -5% | 29 -26% | 24 -4% | 22.9 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 26 -13% | 30.6 -33% | 29 -26% | 30.1 -31% | 22.9 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 26 -13% | 30.6 -33% | 29 -26% | 30.1 -31% | 26.3 -14% |
Load Average * | 40.46 | 52.4 -30% | 45.5 -12% | 40.5 -0% | 41.1 -2% | 27.8 31% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 59.75 | 55.4 7% | 48.2 19% | 53.6 10% | 54.2 9% | 54.2 9% |
Load Maximum * | 59.75 | 55.4 7% | 53.4 11% | 53.6 10% | 54.2 9% | 53.9 10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑的散热系统声音相当响亮,可以很好地控制温度。即使在紧张状态下,我们在顶部测得的最高温度为 39 °C,中心温度最高,而 WASD 键则保持相当低的温度。在底部,Aorus 的最高温度为 51 °C,略高于部分竞争对手。
空闲时,由于设备的风扇大多处于关闭状态,温度比许多竞争对手都要高一些。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | 3% | 2% | 14% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39 | 47.8 -23% | 48.3 -24% | 44.2 -13% | 39.6 -2% | 42.6 -9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 51 | 46.7 8% | 53.3 -5% | 48.1 6% | 49.7 3% | 41.2 19% |
Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 28.4 21% | 28.3 21% | 33 8% | 26.3 27% | 32.6 9% |
Idle Bottom * | 38 | 28.9 24% | 30.3 20% | 36.1 5% | 27.3 28% | 32.4 15% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.36 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
与 Master 18 一样,它在空闲模式下的功耗仍然过高。这也可能是由于当前的 Nvidia 驱动程序造成的;多款 Blackwell 笔记本电脑仍存在这方面的问题,可能很快就会通过优化驱动程序来解决。
在负载情况下,它的功耗与 Scar 18 或 Master 18 差不多。我们测量到,16.5 x 7.5 x 2.6 厘米的 330 瓦电源装置的短期负载峰值高达 325 瓦。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 10% | 37% | -11% | 14% | -22% | 23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 11.8 53% | 10.9 56% | 22.5 10% | 10.8 57% | 28.5 -14% | 14.1 ? 44% |
Idle Average * | 29.4 | 15.1 49% | 13.5 54% | 32.2 -10% | 17.7 40% | 38.8 -32% | 20 ? 32% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 15.8 49% | 13.7 56% | 34.3 -11% | 18.8 39% | 45.6 -47% | 27.1 ? 13% |
Load Average * | 109 | 165.3 -52% | 120.2 -10% | 169.3 -55% | 139.4 -28% | 132.2 -21% | 105.3 ? 3% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 290 | 296 -2% | 178.2 39% | 294 -1% | 295 -2% | 318 -10% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 292 | 289 1% | 177.6 39% | 288 1% | 291 -0% | 319 -9% | |
Load Maximum * | 325 | 415.5 -28% | 246.1 24% | 371.5 -14% | 359.3 -11% | 384 -18% | 255 ? 22% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
Aorus 的电池容量为 99 Wh。在 WLAN 和视频测试中,该设备的运行时间约为 6 小时。如果 Nvidia 和制造商能解决空闲时耗电量高的问题,Aorus 仍有一定的潜力。目前的 BIOS 更新应该可以改善这一状况。在我们的负载测试中,BatteryEater 工具在经典测试中运行良好,即使在电池模式下也能很好地利用硬件。测试在 110 分钟后结束。
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 28% | 45% | -4% | 29% | -38% | 1% | |
H.264 | 346 | 460 33% | 592 71% | 658 90% | 453 ? 31% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 404 | 572 42% | 475 18% | 388 -4% | 469 16% | 323 -20% | 386 ? -4% |
Load | 110 | 121 10% | 88 -20% | 48 -56% | 84.8 ? -23% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 71 | 48 |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Aorus Master 16 是一款功能非常强大的游戏笔记本电脑,但在负载情况下声音也相当大,几乎所有游戏都能流畅运行,甚至是 4K 游戏。它还拥有非常出色的 OLED 显示屏,但目前价格仍然很高。
Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H
- 05/09/2025 v8
Christian Hintze
可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.