结论 - 有改进的余地
微星Stealth 18最大的亮点可以说是其便携性。该系统是 18 英寸机型中最薄、最轻的机型之一,同时还提供发烧级硬件,如英特尔 Arrow Lake-HX 和 Nvidia Blackwell,最高可达 150 W 的GeForce RTX 5090。 Raider 18或 Alienware 18 Area-51但更便于旅行的用户,应该考虑 Stealth 18。
遗憾的是,微星的超薄机身带来了一些缺点。特别是游戏时的风扇噪音和核心温度分别比竞争对手如 雷蛇刀锋 18或前面提到的 Alienware。Cooler Boost 模式可以缓解温度方面的问题,但如果没有一副好的耳机,较高的风扇噪音会让人难以忍受。
280 瓦交流适配器是该系统的一个主要争议点,因为它在游戏时的功率经常会达到 270 瓦或更高,这表明 280 瓦可能不足以发挥全部性能。在负载情况下,它不仅会变得非常热,而且我们的 CPU、GPU 和游戏基准测试经常会比采用类似处理器配置的其他笔记本电脑稍慢一些。微星可能是考虑到 280 W 交流适配器更小巧、更便携,值得在充电速度和性能上与 300 W 以上的大适配器稍作权衡。
其他值得注意的缺失还包括:尽管屏幕尺寸很大,但却没有配备 OLED、G-Sync、Thunderbolt 5 和对二级固态硬盘的支持。事实上,这是唯一一款没有 M.2 存储扩展选项的 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑。希望这些问题能在下一代系统中得到解决,而无需增加厚度或重量。
Pros
Cons
Stealth 18 HX 是微星的超薄游戏笔记本电脑,是对更厚的 Titan 18 HX、Vector 18 或 Raider 18 系列的补充。这是 Stealth 系列中的首款 18 英寸机型,之前的机型为 之前的机型17 英寸或更小。
我们的测试机是最高端的配置,配备酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX CPU、150 WGeForce RTX 5090 GPU 和 4K 2400p Mini-LED 显示屏,零售价约为 4000 美元。较低配置则从GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 和 2K 1600p IPS 显示屏开始。该机型还有一个 AMD 版本,称为 Stealth A18 HX。
Stealth 18 HX 的竞争对手包括其他发烧级 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 雷蛇刀锋 18, 戴尔 Alienware 18 Area-51或 华硕 ROG Strix G18.
更多微星评论:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
外壳 - 薄、薄、薄
底盘由类似于小型 Stealth 16 的镁铝材料组成。 隐形 16相似的质感和印象。它的外观时尚高端,尤其是后部进气格栅的线条和边角设计更为复杂。除了外盖上的发光徽标外,机身外部没有表面的 RGB LED。
刚度不错,但不是最好的,与 Blade 18 或 Blade 18 相比,底部的翘曲和吱吱作响的情况稍多一些。 联想Legion 9 18.对于如此大的 18 英寸屏幕来说,铰链尤其显得非常小,因此我们建议在用力打开盖子时一定要小心。虽然其他 18 英寸的替代产品可能更加稳固,但它们也往往比微星更厚更重。
在尺寸和重量方面,Stealth 18 是同类产品中最薄、最轻的一款,击败了 华硕 ROG Strix G18或 Razer Blade 18。由于微星的设计出于散热目的,后部突出的长度稍长,因此后者的占地面积仍然较小。
连接性
尽管少了一个 USB-A 端口,但 Area-51 或 Blade 18 的所有连接选项在这里都可用。与 Razer 或 Alienware 型号不同,微星还不支持 Thunderbolt 5。
请记住,如果设置为独立显卡模式,USB-C DisplayPort 功能将无法使用。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
网络摄像头
标配 200 万像素网络摄像头,带红外和物理隐私快门。

可持续性
微星加入了 EPEAT 生态标签,以创建可持续发展的电子产品。尽管如此,该公司并未明确提及在生产过程中使用了多少可回收材料。此外,包装大部分是纸质的,也有一些塑料包装。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外,没有任何其他附件。
如果在美国购买,制造商通常会提供为期一年的有限售后服务。
输入设备 - 宽大的按键和点击板
键盘
Stealth 18 键盘的布局和字体与微星其他 18 英寸笔记本电脑不同,例如 矢量 18和 Titan 18 的键盘不同。但键入体验相似,键程比预期的要深,反馈清晰,尤其是对于薄膜键盘而言。相比之下,我们发现 Blade 18 的按键略微偏软。
触摸板
点击板(13.5 x 9 厘米)的尺寸比泰坦 18(13 x 8.5 厘米)大,但比刀锋 18 小。 刀锋 18(15 x 9.8 厘米)小。即使在低速滑行时,牵引力也非常平稳,而点击时的咔嗒声比预期的要小。不过,反馈相对较弱,尤其是在远离角落向中心点击时。
显示屏 - 超亮 4K 2400p Mini-LED
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 532.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 6089:1 (Black: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.02 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 3.04
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
88.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
98.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.64
CCT: 6400 K
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18", 120 Hz | MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 B180ZAN01.0, MiniLED IPS, 3840x2400, 18", 120 Hz | Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop NE180QAM-NZ1, IPS, 3840x2400, 18", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 BOEhydis NE180QAM-NZ2 (BOE0D5B), IPS, 3840x2400, 18", 240 Hz | Alienware 18 Area-51 AU Optronics B180QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 300 Hz | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 NE180QDM-NZC, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -1% | -1% | -1% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 98.9 | 99.9 1% | 97 -2% | 96.8 -2% | 96.1 -3% | 99.4 1% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 88.6 | 93.9 6% | 89 0% | 88.9 0% | 89.7 1% | 87.7 -1% |
| Response Times | -64% | 67% | 35% | 29% | 65% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 18.8 ? | 23 ? -22% | 5.1 ? 73% | 12.7 ? 32% | 13 ? 31% | 3.8 ? 80% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 11.7 ? | 15.1 ? -29% | 4.6 ? 61% | 7.2 ? 38% | 8.7 ? 26% | 5.8 ? 50% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 15285 ? | 15203 | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 41.7 | 100 -140% | ||||
| Screen | 72% | -29% | -1% | -39% | -12% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 791.6 | 510 -36% | 545 -31% | 439 -45% | 512.5 -35% | 582 -26% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 798 | 470 -41% | 510 -36% | 440 -45% | 496 -38% | 557 -30% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 85 -10% | 86 -9% | 84 -11% | 94 0% | 93 -1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.13 | 0.01 92% | 0.41 -215% | 0.27 -108% | 0.41 -215% | 0.4 -208% |
| Contrast (:1) | 6089 | 51000 738% | 1329 -78% | 1626 -73% | 1250 -79% | 1455 -76% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.02 | 4.5 -12% | 2.2 45% | 0.99 75% | 3.24 19% | 1.4 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.81 | 7.3 -26% | 5.8 -0% | 2.25 61% | 8.4 -45% | 3.4 41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.04 | 5.7 -88% | 1.1 64% | 0.62 80% | 0.47 85% | 0.7 77% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 2.3 34% | 3.5 -0% | 1.6 54% | 5 -43% | 1.8 49% |
| Gamma | 2.64 83% | 2.08 106% | 2.18 101% | 2.249 98% | 2.37 93% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6400 102% | 6648 98% | 7027 93% | 6828 95% | 6417 101% | 6633 98% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
31% | 12% /
-9% | 11% /
4% | -4% /
-21% | 18% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 3.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.3 ms rise | |
| ↘ 10.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 15285 Hz Amplitude: 41.7 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 15285 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 15285 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - 配备 150 W 图形处理器的 Intel Arrow Lake-HX
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 MSI Center 设置为性能模式和独立显卡模式。
在独立显卡模式与 MS 混合模式或纯 iGPU 模式之间切换时,需要重新启动。
处理器
酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 酷睿至尊 9 275HX是英特尔最快的 Arrow Lake-HX CPU 之一,但与配备相同 CPU 的其他笔记本电脑相比,它在 Stealth 18 HX 上的性能大约低 10%。例如,Razer Blade 18 在配备相同的 Core Ultra 7 275HX 时,性能要高出 15% 到 20%。
如下图所示,在循环运行 CineBench R15 xT 时,性能的可持续性也非常出色,这也是如此大小的游戏笔记本电脑所应具备的。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30712 - 40970, n=27) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2009 - 2267, n=27) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12026 - 16108, n=26) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (774 - 870, n=26) | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4756 - 6271, n=26) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (306 - 343, n=27) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82 - 116, n=25) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6026 - 7149, n=26) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=28) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2843 - 3160, n=28) | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (19105 - 25855, n=27) | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2033 - 2292, n=27) | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30.7 - 43.8, n=26) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (33.2 - 62.1, n=26) | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=26) | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 -3! | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7474 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (56003 - 94460, n=26) | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (55795 - 97151, n=26) | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (55663 - 106063, n=26) | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 161.6, n=26) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
2 TB 连续读取率 三星 PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB稳定在每秒约 6800 MB。令人失望的是,与 Blade 18 或 Alienware 18 Area-51 分别拥有两个和三个 M.2 SSD 插槽不同,它没有辅助 M.2 SSD 插槽。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
3DMark 结果低于平均水平,与其他配备相同 移动 RTX 5090图形处理器。正如下面的Fire Strike 结果表所示,启用最大风扇噪音模式(又称 MSI Cooler Boost)不会显著提高性能。降至平衡模式对 CPU 性能的影响可能大于图形性能。
降级到 RTX 5080或 RTX 5070 Ti配置对图形性能的影响预计分别约为 10% 和 25%。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式(开启 Cooler Boost) | 48830 | 46090 | 12612 |
| 性能模式 | 48466 (-1%) | 44554 (-3%) | 12813 (-0%) |
| 平衡模式 | 46668 (-4%) | 39895 (-13%) | 10467 (-17%) |
| 电池电量 | 20527 (-58%) | 22088 (-52%) | 6216 (-51%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 46712 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 71140 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 37529 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 22058 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 5804 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
虽然合成基准测试显示 Stealth 18 的性能略逊一筹,但实际游戏性能仍与普通 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑相差无几。在我们测试的所有游戏中,《黑色神话:悟空传》的性能差距最大,约为 10%。除此之外,该系统还能以原生 4K 2400p 分辨率运行要求较高的游戏,尤其是在支持 DLSS 和 FG 功能的情况下。
在我们的设备上,即使重置 Windows 系统,《GTA V》在启动时也会出现错误,因此下面没有记录其结果。
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 | |
| GTA V | |
| 2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (96.9 - 183.9, n=14) | |
| Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| 3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (84.4 - 116.7, n=8) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
| 3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x | |
| MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (150.7 - 179.9, n=6) | |
| Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 | |
| MSI Raider 18 HX A14V | |
| Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 223 | 193.5 | 184.4 | 172 | 168.8 | |||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 233 | 232 | 198.1 | 170 | 101.7 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 151.8 | 143 | 116.8 | 93.5 | ||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 520 | 410 | 381 | 378 | 329 | 155.8 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 267 | 221 | 207 | 195 | 201 | 149.6 | 127.8 | 81.9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 185.5 | 185.8 | 167.6 | 152.7 | 122.6 | 111.5 | 49.9 | |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 130.1 | 128.1 | 123.5 | 81.1 | 68.3 | 41.6 | ||
| F1 24 (2024) | 310 | 338 | 326 | 142.7 | 144.8 | 97 | 75.3 | 44.4 |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 158 | 118 | 95 | 55 | 62 | 42 | 43 | 26 |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 186.4 | 146.1 | 126.1 | 119.9 | 101.6 | 65.5 | ||
| Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 100.1 | 94.8 | 83.5 | 81.9 | 70.4 | 60.3 | 44.4 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 106 | 101 | 88 | 68 | 67 | 58 | 55 | 42 |
排放物 - 高音风扇
系统噪音
在运行浏览器或视频等负载要求不高的情况下,风扇在保持安静方面还算不错,在 24.6 分贝(A)的静音背景下,偶尔也会出现高达 30 分贝(A)的脉动。在性能模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,风扇噪音稳定在 53 分贝(A)以下,比我们在 Blade 18 或 Alienware 18 Area-51的噪音。将系统降至平衡模式后,游戏时的风扇噪音上限将降至 47.7 dB(A),但如上文 GPU 性能部分所述,这将对性能造成轻微影响。
开启 Cooler Boost 模式后,风扇噪音上限将升至 63 分贝(A),主要用于手动超频或降低运行温度。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.8 / 24.8 / 30.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 38 / 63 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Alienware 18 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 8% | -5% | -3% | 2% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.6 | 25.1 -2% | 23.4 5% | 24 2% | 23.4 5% | 24.6 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.8 | 28.6 -15% | 23.4 6% | 24 3% | 30.2 -22% | 24.6 1% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.8 | 28.9 -17% | 23.4 6% | 30 -21% | 30.6 -23% | 30 -21% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 30.2 | 29.2 3% | 23.4 23% | 32 -6% | 30.6 -1% | 30 1% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 38 | 45.6 -20% | 40.4 -6% | 46 -21% | 38 -0% | 34.4 9% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 52.7 | 55.6 -6% | 48.2 9% | 56 -6% | 48.9 7% | 49.7 6% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 63 | 45.8 27% | 53.5 15% | 56 11% | 55.9 11% | 49.7 21% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使与其他 18 英寸游戏笔记本电脑相比,其表面温度也比预期的要高。例如,在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,顶部和底部的热点温度将分别达到 50 摄氏度以上,而在类似条件下,Blade 18 的温度则在 40 摄氏度以下。尤其是在游戏时,手掌或手指上的掌托会明显发热。
此外,在运行游戏等高负载时,交流适配器会变得非常热,温度接近 70 摄氏度(!)。相比之下,前面提到的 刀锋 18的交流适配器在负载情况下温度会保持在 50 摄氏度以下。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.4 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Alienware 18 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | 18% | 7% | 19% | 19% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 50 | 49.3 1% | 44.3 11% | 41 18% | 36.8 26% | 42.8 14% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 52.4 | 50.9 3% | 42 20% | 39 26% | 35.8 32% | 43.1 18% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 33.6 | 35.2 -5% | 27.2 19% | 38 -13% | 30.6 9% | 26.8 20% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 34.2 | 33.5 2% | 27.5 20% | 36 -5% | 30.8 10% | 26.6 22% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
运行 Prime95 压力模式时,CPU 稳定在 3.3 GHz、87 C 和 101 W 左右。在性能模式下运行《赛博朋克 2077》 时,GPU 的频率将稳定在 2137 MHz、78 C 和 147 W,而如果启动 Cooler Boost,频率将稳定在 1957 MHz、66 C 和 139 W。因此,Cooler Boost 更有助于降低核心温度,而不是一键实现更快性能的解决方案。然而,GPU 的温度比预期的要高,因为同样的 GPU 在 Alienware Area-51的 GPU 运行温度在 60 摄氏度左右,而微星的 GPU 运行温度在 70 摄氏度左右。
值得注意的是,交流适配器有时会随机断开连接,并在游戏时或 CPU 和 GPU 都处于完全受压状态时进入电池供电模式。这种行为很可能是系统或机型的错误。
| 平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 55 | 50 |
| Prime95 压力 | 3.3 | -- | 87 | 54 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.9 | 1747 | 83 | 81 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力(平衡模式) | 1.5 | 1822 | 72 | 71 |
| 赛博朋克2077压力(性能模式) | 1.9 | 2137 | 82 | 78 |
| 赛博朋克2077压力(性能模式,带冷却器提升) | 2.1 | 1957 | 71 | 66 |
MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 需要更大的 PSU
耗电量
系统随附一个中等大小(约 16.5 x 7.5 x 2.5 厘米)的 280 瓦交流适配器,对于如此高要求的机器来说,这个适配器可能太小了。联想 联想Legion 9 18例如,配置相同 CPU 和 GPU 的联想或 Blade 18 都配备了 330 W 的交流适配器。此外,微星在游戏时的功耗高达 278 瓦,而附带的 280 瓦交流适配器功耗甚至超过 300 瓦,这证明该系统本可以使用更大的 PSU。如果同时进行游戏或运行其他要求较高的负载,充电速度会非常慢。
与配置相同 CPU 和 GPU 的 Razer Blade 18 相比,运行《赛博朋克 2077》的耗电量要少 18%。不过,如上文 GPU 性能部分所述,微星的性能也会稍慢一些。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2400, 18" | MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD, MiniLED IPS, 3840x2400, 18" | Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Lexar NM790 2TB, IPS, 3840x2400, 18" | Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD, IPS, 3840x2400, 18" | Alienware 18 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, , IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -31% | 4% | -17% | -35% | 32% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 19.2 | 41.5 -116% | 18.1 6% | 30.9 -61% | 38.4 -100% | 13.1 32% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 33.2 | 53.5 -61% | 27.9 16% | 32.6 2% | 45.6 -37% | 20.6 38% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 53 | 53.8 -2% | 28.7 46% | 42.1 21% | 57.5 -8% | 21.1 60% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 149.2 | 168.5 -13% | 108.3 27% | 150 -1% | 190.1 -27% | 123.4 17% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 265 | 295 -11% | 331 -25% | 343 -29% | 333 -26% | 179.2 32% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 278 | 298 -7% | 338 -22% | 348 -25% | 340 -22% | 215 23% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 306.5 | 323.7 -6% | 366.7 -20% | 393 -28% | 373.2 -22% | 249.7 19% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
在不违反任何 TSA 法规的前提下,99 Wh 的电池容量已达到最高水平。不过,当设置为 iGPU 模式时,实际浏览时间仅为 5 小时,在同类产品中处于平均水平。结果比 Razer Blade 18 或 华硕 ROG Strix G18各短几个小时,但却比微星 Raider A18 或 Alienware 18 Area-51 长。
使用随附的交流适配器从空电充至满电大约需要 2 小时。
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.9 Wh | MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.99 Wh | Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.9 Wh | Alienware 18 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 96 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -56% | 63% | -40% | -58% | 48% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 4.8 | 2.1 -56% | 7.8 63% | 2.9 -40% | 2 -58% | 7.1 48% |
| Load (h) | 1.1 |
笔记本检查评级
第一代 Stealth 18 游戏笔记本电脑在外观上给人留下了深刻印象,但它还需要一些调整和硬件更新,才能更具竞争力。
MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW
- 11/07/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSI Stealth 18 HX AI A2XW Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $4,375.00 List Price: 4000 USD | 3 kg | 23.99 mm | 18.00" 3840x2400 252 PPI Mini-LED | |
| MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2000 GB SSD | Amazon: $4,999.00 List Price: 4350 Euro | 3.6 kg | 34 mm | 18.00" 3840x2400 252 PPI MiniLED IPS | |
| Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $4,699.99 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... 2. $4,399.99 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... 3. $2,299.00 Razer Blade 17 Gaming Laptop... List Price: 5299€ | 3.2 kg | 27.9 mm | 18.00" 3840x2400 252 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo Legion 9 18IAX10 RTX 5090 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $199.99 400W Charger for Lenovo Legi... 2. $3,599.00 Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 ... 3. $3,529.98 Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 ... List Price: 5900 EUR | 3.5 kg | 28 mm | 18.00" 3840x2400 252 PPI IPS | |
| Alienware 18 Area-51 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory | Amazon: $2,999.99 List Price: 4400 USD | 4.2 kg | 24.32 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS | |
| Asus ROG Strix G18 2025 G814 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,699.99 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... 2. $2,099.00 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... 3. $1,949.00 EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... List Price: 2299€ | 2.9 kg | 30.8 mm | 18.00" 2560x1600 168 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

































































































