判决
正如开头提到的,微星 Prestige 13 AI+ 的超薄设计和超轻重量给人留下了深刻印象。微星 Prestige 13 AI+ 的重量只有不到 900 克,明显轻于许多竞争对手,后者的重量通常超过 1 千克,甚至接近 1.5 千克。因此,这款 13 英寸机型非常便于携带。
得益于高效的 Panther Lake CPU(在长时间负载情况下性能会有所下降),尽管机身小巧,但废气排放仍得到了合理的控制。电池续航时间是它的另一个优势,尽管几乎所有竞争对手在这方面都表现出色。Prestige 13 AI+ 凭借快速读卡器、强大的 Wi-Fi 7 模块和两个雷电 4 端口,再次从众多产品中脱颖而出。微星应该改进音效,因为扬声器以及键盘布局和一些按键的大小都比较平庸。
Prestige 13 AI+ 与其他采用当前 Panther Lake 芯片的子笔记本竞争,如 联想 Yoga Slim 7 14(Core Ultra 7 355)、联想 IdeaPad 14 联想 IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14(Core Ultra 5 322)或 Honor MagicBook Pro 14(Core Ultra 5 338H)。在 AMD 方面,搭载 Ryzen AI 7 350 的设备适合进行比较,如 华硕 ZenBook 14 OLED.骁龙方面,有 ZenBook A14也是一个不错的选择。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
经过测试的 Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG 可在各种在线零售商处购买,起价约为 1,600 欧元(约合 1,847 美元)。
Table of Contents
规格
外壳、连接、维护和输入设备
这款设计时尚的银灰色机壳由镁铝材料制成,这也是这款 13 英寸设备如此轻巧的原因之一。虽然这种材料给人的感觉不像纯铝那样高级,但看起来同样稳定,比廉价的塑料机壳质量更高。13 英寸机型的机身高度约为 1.6 厘米,与竞争对手的机身高度在 1.4 至 1.7 厘米之间。在做工方面没有什么值得批评的地方,只要你忽略两颗侧面安装的机箱螺丝,它们会因设计而略微突出。一个不错的亮点是:盖子可以完全打开 180 度。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
在端口方面,微星提供了一个音频插孔、一个 HDMI 2.1 输出、一个快速的 microSD 读卡器、一个 Kensington 锁插槽和四个 USB 端口。两个 Type-C 端口支持 Thunderbolt 4,包括 DisplayPort 和 Power Delivery。网络摄像头提供了相当典型、平庸的笔记本电脑功能。
拧松 7 颗十字螺丝后,底盖即可取下。机盖下是一个带有一个风扇和一个热管的冷却系统。此外,还有一个用于固态硬盘的 M.2 插槽,电池和快速无线模块也可以使用。不过,由于内存是焊接的,因此无法更换。
白色背光键盘提供了不错的键入体验,但正如我们对微星笔记本电脑的期望一样,它的布局需要相当长时间的适应,在我们看来并不理想。此外,一些非常小的按键也要扣分,包括方向键、><| 键和 Windows Copilot 键。约 12 x 7.5 厘米的触摸板非常顺滑,通常也能可靠地工作,因此总体上比键盘更好用。不过,与许多笔记本电脑一样,触摸板的 "嗒嗒 "声可能听起来不那么刺耳。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23.7 - 188, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (24.9 - 195, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel® Killer™ Wi-Fi 7 BE1775s (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (n=1last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel® Killer™ Wi-Fi 7 BE1775s (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (n=1last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
网络摄像头

显示屏
微星选择了分辨率为 2880 x 1800 的 OLED 面板,尽管其反射表面使其在户外使用时显得相当薄弱。我们测得的平均亮度略低于 400 cd/m²,属于稳定水平。其余数值也符合 OLED 显示屏的预期。得益于出色的黑度,对比度非常高,轻松超越了传统的 IPS 面板。
在响应时间、色彩准确度和色域覆盖率方面也没有什么可挑剔的:100% sRGB 和 DCI-P3,以及 96% AdobeRGB。不过,敏感的用户可能会遇到屏幕闪烁的问题。在最糟糕的情况下,60 Hz 的频率是相当低的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 394 cd/m²
Contrast: 78800:1 (Black: 0.005 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.67 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
95.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.212
CCT: 6470 K
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG ATNA33AA07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 EDO14.55, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.6", 120 Hz | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA ATNA40CT06-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -51% | -5% | 0% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 99.3 -1% | 42 -58% | 96.3 -4% | 99.9 0% | 99.5 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 60.9 -39% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 98.8 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 95.7 | 87.7 -8% | 43.4 -55% | 85 -11% | 96.4 1% | 88.9 -7% |
| Response Times | 16% | -1228% | 67% | -2% | 34% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.8 ? | 0.64 ? 64% | 26.8 ? -1389% | 0.55 ? 69% | 1.6 ? 11% | 1.22 ? 32% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.5 ? | 0.94 ? 37% | 17.5 ? -1067% | 0.51 ? 66% | 2 ? -33% | 1.26 ? 16% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 60 ? | 479.46 ? | 120 ? | 480 | 480 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 33 | 50 -52% | 11 67% | 28 15% | 15 55% | |
| Screen | 5% | -938% | -6% | -66% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 394 | 470.7 19% | 411 4% | 519 32% | 386 -2% | 404 3% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 395 | 488 24% | 397 1% | 526 33% | 387 -2% | 408 3% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 94 -4% | 91 -7% | 89 -9% | 97 -1% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.005 | 0.32 -6300% | 0.01 -100% | 0.03 -500% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 78800 | 1284 -98% | 51900 -34% | 12867 -84% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.67 | 2.21 -32% | 6.88 -312% | 1.1 34% | 1.55 7% | 1.1 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.9 | 5.02 -29% | 19.85 -409% | 2.2 44% | 3.39 13% | 3.3 15% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 0.6 50% | 5.8 -383% | 1.8 -50% | 0.67 44% | 1.9 -58% |
| Gamma | 2.212 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.202 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.42 91% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 6470 100% | 6472 100% | 6359 102% | 6496 100% | 6505 100% | 6547 99% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.82 | 0.7 | 1.55 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
6% | -739% /
-778% | 19% /
10% | -23% /
-38% | 10% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 33 % | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7810 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
核心 Ultra 9 386H Core Ultra 9 386H提供中端性能。约 1600 欧元的购买价格还可获得 1 TB 固态硬盘和 32 GB LPDDR5X 内存,在当前内存危机的情况下,这个价格还是比较合理的。
| 模式 | AI引擎 | 性能 | 平衡 | ECO静音 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 41 dB(A) | 40 dB(A) | 32 dB(A) | 31 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077 帧频(FHD/超高清) | 19.1 帧 | 19.3 帧 | 16.2 帧 | 10.1 帧 |
| CPU PL1 | 可变 | 24 W | 15 W | 10 W |
| CPU PL2 | 可变 | 34 W | 25 W | 10 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 2513 分 | 2490 分 | 1963 分 | 1224 分 |
处理器
Core Ultra 9 386H 是一款现代 Panther Lake 处理器,拥有 16 个核心,没有超线程技术,我们已经对它进行过多次测试。在我们的基准测试套件中,Prestige 13 AI+ 仅略微领先于配备了 Ryzen AI 7 350和 酷睿至尊 7 355尽管核心数更多。正如我们的 Cinebench 循环测试所显示的,这款笔记本电脑在短时间负载后仍无法保持 CPU 性能,性能略有下降。大多数竞争对手都能较好地处理这一问题。
Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H -1! | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 -1! | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (10001 - 21727, n=6) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (53370 - 113595, n=6) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2776 - 5604, n=6) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 95002, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5314 - 7332, n=6) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (28414 - 61578, n=6) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (46362 - 72112, n=6) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 96917, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (669 - 1271, n=6) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5138 - 11627, n=6) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (54042 - 89891, n=6) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 85600, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
尽管如此,在系统基准测试中,13 英寸机型仍名列第三,仅次于Honor MagicBook Pro 14。在日常使用中,笔记本电脑的响应速度非常快。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA -4! | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (7679 - 8325, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4920 - 9939, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (10375 - 10894, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8552 - 11646, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (12295 - 15282, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 16606, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (9175 - 9873, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5722 - 13779, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1975 - 1978, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2356, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1842 - 1886, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 2277, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (2169 - 2240, n=2) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2743, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1667 - 1733, n=2) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1854, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 530, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (302 - 323, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (282 - 309, n=2) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 378, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 1104, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (447 - 456, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7679 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75437 - 129946, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 131023, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (81021 - 118858, n=6) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75959 - 135096, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 135141, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (87.2 - 116.9, n=6) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6.1 - 159.9, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储
与 CPU 类似,固态硬盘在负载较重的情况下也会出现速度下降。联想 IdeaPad 5i 2 合 1 14 也受到了后者的影响。不过,美光内置的 NVMe 硬盘性能良好,尤其是在连续读取方面。
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7026 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 143052 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23108 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5086 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2672 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
我们的游戏测试套件显示,游戏大致可分为三类。要求不高或较老的游戏,如 F1 25至少在全高清范围(即 1920 x 1080 像素)内运行流畅,在某些情况下甚至可以在高设置下运行。CPU 密集型游戏,如 深红沙漠和 007 First Light另一方面,即使在最低设置下也会出现严重卡顿。其他游戏则介于两者之间,至少可以通过 XeSS 升频将帧率提升到可用水平。总体而言,游戏性能与 Radeon 860M.
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (32.7 - 43.4, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23.7 - 31.3, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| 007 First Light | |
| 1920x1080 Low Settings AF:16x | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17 - 21, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Settings AF:16x | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14.8 - 20.1, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 139.2 | 67.5 | 77.7 | 73 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 44.6 | 33.5 | 30.1 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 37.3 | 28.8 | 24.4 | 19.1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 78.8 | 59.1 | 33.4 | 20.9 |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 32.7 | 23.7 | 18.8 | 12.6 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 62 | 53 | 39 | 10 |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 (2025) | 52 | 47 | 33 | 9 |
| Resident Evil Requiem (2026) | 25.3 | 18.8 | 16.2 | 8.21 |
| Crimson Desert (2026) | 16.5 | 13.9 | 13 | 12.4 |
| Pragmata (2026) | 27.7 | 20.8 | 16.6 | |
| 007 First Light (2026) | 17 | 14.8 | 13.6 | 12.8 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
虽然 Prestige 13 AI+ 在怠速时的噪音往往比竞争对手略大,但在负载情况下,其 31 至 42 分贝(A)的噪音与竞争对手基本相当。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 26 / 27 / 28 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 31 / 42 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL | Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Ultra 5 338H, Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -3% | 2% | 6% | -3% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25 | 23.1 8% | 24 4% | 25.7 -3% | 24 4% | 24.2 3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 26 | 25.4 2% | 24 8% | 25.7 1% | 24 8% | 24.2 7% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 27 | 25.5 6% | 25 7% | 25.7 5% | 24 11% | 24.2 10% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 28 | 25.5 9% | 26 7% | 25.7 8% | 24 14% | 24.2 14% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 31 | 44.4 -43% | 43 -39% | 30.2 3% | 31.75 -2% | 41.3 -33% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 41 | 43.4 -6% | 42 -2% | 39.4 4% | 39.25 4% | 41.3 -1% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 42 | 45.5 -8% | 44 -5% | 42.9 -2% | 42.16 -0% | 51.7 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-0.8 °C / -1.4 F).
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL | Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Ultra 5 338H, Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 25% | -22% | 10% | -7% | -6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 42 | 33.6 20% | 47 -12% | 39.1 7% | 41 2% | 40.9 3% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 41 | 28.8 30% | 54 -32% | 35.7 13% | 47 -15% | 47.2 -15% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 25.2 | 25.2 | 29 | 24.5 | ||
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 24.6 | 24.9 | 30 | 24 |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
2.0 系统的音质低于平均水平。除了最大音量外,低音效果尤其有待改进。大多数竞争对手在这方面都有优势。
MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
综合来看,所有数值都表明 Prestige 13 AI+ 是测试领域中最高效的笔记本电脑之一,电池运行时间良好。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL | Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Ultra 5 338H, Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -20% | -8% | -63% | -19% | -44% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.5 | 3.2 9% | 4 -14% | 6.8 -94% | 3.8 -9% | 4.7 -34% | 3.78 ? -8% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4 | 3.9 2% | 4.8 -20% | 8.2 -105% | 6.7 -68% | 7.1 -78% | 6.6 ? -65% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 6.4 | 12.3 -92% | 7.4 -16% | 9.1 -42% | 6.9 -8% | 7.4 -16% | 7.93 ? -24% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 44 | 36.5 17% | 36 18% | 40.4 8% | 51.6 -17% | 39.6 10% | 41.8 ? 5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 41 | 51.1 -25% | 34 17% | 66.1 -61% | 35.7 13% | 65.3 -59% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 54 | 69 -28% | 71 -31% | 100.2 -86% | 66 -22% | 101.8 -89% | 64.7 ? -20% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 50.6 | 66 | 45 | 31.4 |
* ... smaller is better
电池寿命
微星为这款 13 英寸设备配备的电池容量略低于 54 Wh,与竞争对手的 60 至 92 Wh 相比略显不足。不过,在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下,我们的 Wi-Fi 测试结果为 12 小时左右,这仍然令人印象深刻。
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 53.8 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 75 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL, 60 Wh | Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Ultra 5 338H, Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU, 92 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 75 Wh | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90, 70 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -12% | 28% | 24% | 8% | 34% | 17% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 12 | 10.6 -12% | 15.3 28% | 14.9 24% | 13 8% | 16.1 34% | 14 ? 17% |
| H.264 (h) | 15.7 | 15.8 ? | |||||
| Load (h) | 2.3 | 1.942 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG 是一款非常便携的全能型笔记本电脑,其轻巧的机身给人留下了深刻印象。不过,由于酷睿 Ultra 9 386H 无法充分发挥其潜力,因此价格更低的酷睿 Ultra 7 355 也已足够。
MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG
- 06/08/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1600 EUR | 888 g | 15.9 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1700 USD | 978 g | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Intel Core Ultra 5 322 ⎘ Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $549.00 Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14"... 2. $459.97 Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14" F... 3. $599.99 Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i Chrom... List Price: 800 EUR | 1.6 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Intel Core Ultra 5 338H ⎘ Intel Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $15.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 2. $122.25 GENTERUN Laptop Screen,Compa... | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.60" 3120x2080 257 PPI OLED | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UM3406K, Ryzen AI 7 350 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1399 Euro | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,079.00 ASUS Zenbook A14 14" FHD+ OL... 2. $899.99 ASUS Zenbook A14 Copilot+ PC... 3. $799.00 ASUS Zenbook A14 Laptop 14" ... | 992 g | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.







































