Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 355

Intel Ultra 7 355

英特尔酷睿Ultra 5 355是Panther Lake系列笔记本电脑的中端8核（4+4）系统芯片。

它集成了英特尔采用全新 18A 工艺制造的计算芯片，配备 4 个大型 Cougar Cove P 内核，主频高达 2.3 - 4.7 GHz，以及 4 个 Darkmont LP（低功耗）E 内核，主频为 1.7 - 3.5 GHz。此外，还安装了带有 50 TOPS INT 8 的新型 NPU 5 和 IPU 7.5 图像处理器。集成内存控制器支持高达 96 GB LPDDR5X-7467 或 128 GB DDR5-6400。

图形处理器芯片包含一个快速 iGPU，具有 4 个 Xe3 内核，支持光线追踪，由英特尔公司使用英特尔 3 处理器制造。

第三个芯片组集成了平台控制器，具有 12 个 PCIe 通道、4 个 Thunderbolt 4、Wi-Fi 7 (R2) 和蓝牙 Core 6.0。

据英特尔公司称，TDP 规定为 15-25 瓦（基本），短期内可达 55 瓦。

CodenamePanther Lake
SeriesIntel Panther Lake

Series: Panther Lake Panther Lake

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H1.6 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X9 378H1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H1.6 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H1.6 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H1.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Arc G3 Extreme1.5 - 4.7 GHz14 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Arc G31.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3651.8 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 355 « 1.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H1.5 - 4.6 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3351.6 - 4.6 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3251.6 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3321.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 3221.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1700 - 4700 MHz
Level 1 Cache2.3 MB
Level 2 Cache16 MB
Level 3 Cache12 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 4.7 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core
4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)25 Watt
TDP Turbo PL255 Watt
Manufacturing Technology1.8 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketFCBGA2540
GPUIntel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT8
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/05/2026
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
38.5 pt (65%)
AMD E1-2100
2.26 -94%
...
Intel Arc G3 Extreme
38.2 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450
38.3 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
38.3 -1%
Intel Core i7-12850HX
38.3 -1%
Intel Core i9-13900HK
38.3 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
38.4 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 240
38.4 0%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
38.4 0%
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
38.4 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 355
38.5
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
38.7 1%
Intel Core i9-12900H
38.7 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
38.8 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
38.8 1%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
38.8 1%
Intel Core i7-1370P
38.8 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
38.8 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
38.9 1%
Intel Core i7-13700H
38.9 1%
...
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
49.2 28%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
59.5 55%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2026 - Cinebench 2026 CPU Single Thread
min: 468     avg: 475     median: 476 (64%)     max: 479 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2026 - Cinebench 2026 CPU Multi
min: 2574     avg: 2637     median: 2626 (26%)     max: 2749 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 117.1     avg: 117.9     median: 117.7 (14%)     max: 119.1 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 636     avg: 653     median: 651 (12%)     max: 677 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10966     avg: 11261     median: 11267 (10%)     max: 11504 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -98%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
10701 -5%
Intel Core i7-11850H
10857 -4%
Intel Core Ultra 5 325
10868 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
10889 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
10920 -3%
Intel Core i5-1340P
10921 -3%
Intel Core i9-11980HK
10923 -3%
Intel Core 5 210H
11074 -2%
Intel Core 5 220H
11198 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 355
11261
AMD Ryzen AI 5 435
11333 1%
Intel Core i5-12450HX
11390 1%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 345
11461 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
11486 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
11507 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
11515 2%
Intel Core i7-12650H
11525 2%
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
11534 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
11604 3%
...
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
39891 254%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 856%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1931     avg: 1958     median: 1964 (80%)     max: 1984 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 730     avg: 740     median: 742 (80%)     max: 749 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4282     avg: 4347     median: 4359 (11%)     max: 4381 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1654     avg: 1683     median: 1683 (11%)     max: 1707 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1250
32.5 -98%
...
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
1639 -3%
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
1656 -2%
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1656 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U
1658 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
1663 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
1664 -1%
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
1664 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
1676 0%
Intel Xeon W-2145
1682 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 355
1683
AMD Ryzen AI 5 435
1686 0%
Apple M1 Pro
1690 0%
Apple M1 Max
1691 0%
Intel Core 5 210H
1697 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
1698 1%
Intel Core i5-13420H
1699 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
1701 1%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 345
1712 2%
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
1718 2%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
5998 256%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 841%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
0357010514017521024528031535038542045549052556059563066570073577080584087591094598010151050108511201155119012251260129513301365140014351470150515401575161016451680Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 288     avg: 290.4     median: 291 (80%)     max: 292 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 36122     avg: 37509     median: 37429 (21%)     max: 38450 MIPS
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5734     avg: 5781     median: 5772 (66%)     max: 5831 MIPS
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.2     avg: 14.5     median: 14.4 (25%)     max: 14.8 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 479     avg: 499.4     median: 503 (6%)     max: 512 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 299     avg: 306.4     median: 307 (2%)     max: 310 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4258     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4438 sec
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15404     avg: 15718     median: 15857 (39%)     max: 15939 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13691     avg: 13938     median: 13812 (35%)     max: 14267 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18007     avg: 20460     median: 21534 (38%)     max: 21908 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7640     avg: 7949     median: 7990 (34%)     max: 8162 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 Single-Core
min: 2701     avg: 2725     median: 2718 (63%)     max: 2769 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 Multi-Core
min: 11036     avg: 11367     median: 11394 (39%)     max: 11702 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1999     avg: 2018     median: 2020 (68%)     max: 2034 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10000     avg: 10128     median: 10152 (18%)     max: 10284 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 470     avg: 476.2     median: 474 (1%)     max: 487 ms
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 279     avg: 281.8     median: 283 (70%)     max: 284 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 300     avg: 301.6     median: 302 (51%)     max: 303 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1627     avg: 1808     median: 1818 (64%)     max: 1892 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 49.8     avg: 52.9     median: 52.3 (9%)     max: 55.9 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 55.2     avg: 60     median: 59.6 (11%)     max: 65.4 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 1.763     avg: 2.5     median: 1.9 (1%)     max: 3.86 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.986     avg: 2.8     median: 2.6 (2%)     max: 4 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
27.8 Points per Watt (21%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Amazon Logo
  • $1,199.00
    Acer Swift Go 16 AI Copilot+ PC Laptop, 16" 2K OLED Touchscreen, Intel 8-core Ultra 7 355(>Ultra 9 288V), 32GB LPDDR5X, 1TB SSD, Backlit KB, Wi-Fi7, Thunderbolt 4, w/Stylus, Win11Home
  • $1,087.74
    Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3i - Lightweight Laptop - Copilot+ PC - Intel Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 355-15.3" WUXGA Touchscreen Display - 16GB RAM - 1TB SSD Storage - Integrated Intel® Graphics - Luna Grey
  • $1,199.99
    Acer Swift Go 16 AI Copilot+Laptop, 16'' WUXGA OLED Touchscreen, 32 GB RAM
  • $1,999.99
    LG gram Pro 16 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 7 355, 32GB LPDDR5X, 1TB SSD
  • $1,399.98
    Samsung Galaxy Book6 2026 Copilot+ PC 16" Touch Screen Business AI Laptop

v1.35
log 24. 08:24:33

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 22 Aug 2026 05:34:00 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.006s ... 0.008s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#20 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.012s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 20448 +0.038s ... 0.051s

#23 got single benchmarks 20448 +0.022s ... 0.073s

#24 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#25 min, max, avg, median took s +1.479s ... 1.552s

#26 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.31s ... 1.862s

#27 return log +0s ... 1.862s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 7 355 processor

戴尔 16S DS16260 评测：比戴尔 16 Plus 更出色

戴尔 16S DS16260 评测：比戴尔 16 Plus 更出色

16S 相比去年的戴尔 16 Plus 进行了大幅升级。不过，在更高配置级别下，价格可能会飙升至离谱的程度，因此 XPS 16 反而更值得购买。
Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 16", 1.8 kg
戴尔 14S DS14260 评测：性能媲美 XPS 14

戴尔 14S DS14260 评测：性能媲美 XPS 14

与戴尔 14 Plus 相比，戴尔 14S 有了显著提升，特别是在机身设计和刚性方面。不过，即使以 16 英寸机型而言，它的重量仍略重于我们的预期。
Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 1.5 kg
ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 第11代评测：联想迄今为止最具吸引力的二合一笔记本

ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 第11代评测：联想迄今为止最具吸引力的二合一笔记本

今年，搭载Panther Lake处理器并焕新设计的14英寸ThinkPad X1重磅回归。这些细微的改动累积起来，带来了明显更佳的用户体验，尤其取决于具体配置。
Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 1.3 kg
联想 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 评测：XPS 14 的最佳替代品

联想 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 评测：XPS 14 的最佳替代品

联想最新推出的 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14 直接向戴尔 XPS 发起进攻。该机型的重量不到 1 千克，已经比戴尔的旗舰产品轻了很多，同时还保留了相同的英特尔 Panther Lake X7 和 X9 CPU 选项。
Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 978 g
戴尔 XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 评测：依然出色，但不再特别

戴尔 XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 评测：依然出色，但不再特别

如果用户不需要酷睿 Ultra X7 强得多的图形处理能力，那么价格较低的酷睿 Ultra 7 会更有吸引力，尤其是从旧款 XPS 13 或 XPS 14 升级的用户。
Intel Core Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 14", 1.5 kg

Dell 14S DS14260: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell 14S DS14260 - 评测与配置

Dell 16S DS16260: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell 16S DS16260 - 评测与配置

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 - 评测与配置

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 OLED: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00"
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 OLED - 评测与配置

MSI Modern 16S AI+ G3M: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 16S AI+ G3M - 评测与配置

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G7: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G7 - 评测与配置

HP OmniBook 5 16-bm0000: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP OmniBook 5 16-bm0000 - 评测与配置

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G14: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G14 - 评测与配置

Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IPH11: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IPH11

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » 联想 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11

MSI Prestige 14 AI+ D3M: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 AI+ D3M

Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE

MSI Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » 微星 Prestige 16 AI+ C3MG

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i 14IPH11: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » 联想 Yoga Slim 7i 14IPH11

Dell XPS 16 (2026) DA16260: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » 戴尔 XPS 16 (2026) DA16260

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 OLED: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00"
   » 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 第 14 代 OLED 与 IPS 对比——一个艰难的抉择

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » ThinkPad X1 第11代二合一笔记本的触控笔充电功能虽然很棒，但缺点也很明显

   » 仅有一款 ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 第 11 代机型在图形性能方面实现了显著提升

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1 kg
   » 联想笔记本电脑的高刷新率显示器一直设置为 60 赫兹。以下是简单的修复方法

   » 联想 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14 Aura 是采用酷睿 Ultra X7 处理器的最轻便笔记本之一，但有一个问题

   » 联想 Yoga Slim 7i Ultra Aura 比戴尔 XPS 14 便宜 300 多美元，内存是后者的两倍

Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » 根据首次基准测试，英特尔 4 Xe3 GPU 比旗舰产品 Arc B390 慢 50% 以上

   » 首批酷睿至尊 7 355 基准测试结果出炉，其性能远不及酷睿至尊 X7

Samsung Galaxy Book6 NP760VJG-KG5DE: Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Book6 系列上手体验：所有型号、价格和上市日期

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Panther Lake

» Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X9 378H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
   16x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
   16x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Arc G3 Extreme
   14x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Arc G3
   14x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 365
   8x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 355
   8x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 335
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 325
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 332
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 322
   6x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ Intel Core i5-13450HX
   10x 1.8 GHz - 4.6 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS
   8x 3.8 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 7 365
   8x 1.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 355
   8x 1.7 GHz - 4.7 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 250
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-01-12)