结论--我们最喜欢的联想蛤壳机
Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14 灵光版几乎完全专注于基本功能，是联想最适合旅行者的超轻薄笔记本之一，它配备了最新的英特尔处理器，但没有任何花哨或附加的新奇功能。尤其是 Panther Lake 处理器在效率方面提升了一大步，因此要达到小于 1 千克的目标重量，需要走的弯路比想象的要少。虽然过去曾有过低于 1 千克的旧式 14 英寸外形设计，但它们的缺点也是显而易见的，包括性能较差、运行时间较短、不支持触摸屏以及机身更容易变形。新推出的 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14 Aura 提供了不错的游戏级性能（如果配置 X7）、可观的电池续航时间、标配 OLED 触摸屏和坚固的机身，给人留下了出色的第一印象，尤其是当你记住它比竞争产品 XPS 14.
尽管如此，XPS 14 还是存在一些不足之处。希望最大限度提高机箱刚性和电池寿命的用户仍会发现，重型 XPS 14 更坚固、更持久、更安静，而且内部扬声器和 3.5 毫米音频支持更强大。但是，如果你发现自己经常走来走去，一天中的大部分时间都不固定在一张桌子上，那么联想可以说是更强的选择。
Pros
+ 搭载 Panther Lake X7，GPU 性能卓越
+ 标配 120 Hz OLED 触摸屏
+ 宽达 ~170 度的铰链角度
+ 最轻的 14 英寸蛤壳机之一
+ 重量轻，电池续航时间长
Cons
- 没有集成 HDMI、USB-A 或 3.5 毫米音频插孔
- 不支持全长 M.2 2280 NVMe 固态硬盘
- 风扇声音略大于竞争对手
- 负载情况下核心温度较高
- Turbo Boost 潜力有限
$990.03
Lenovo Slim 7I 14/Touch/CORE Ultra 7 256V/16/1TB
在 2026 年美国国际消费类电子产品展览会上亮相，并在几个月后推出 几个月后Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11（或 Yoga Slim 7i Ultra 14 Aura Edition G11）是首批搭载英特尔 Panther Lake 处理器的联想笔记本电脑之一，取代了 2024 九代机型上的 Meteor Lake 选项。 2024 九代机型和 Lunar Lake 2025 年第 10 代机型上的月球湖选项。.它采用了焕然一新的设计，摒弃了昔日花哨的 2.5D 玻璃和 3200 万像素的超大网络摄像头传感器，采用了更轻便、更集中的设计。
我们的测试机是配备酷睿至尊 7 355 CPU 的中端配置，售价约为 1700 美元。低端配置包括 Core Ultra 5 325，高端配置包括 Core Ultra X7 358H 或 Core Ultra X9 388H，但所有配置都配备相同的 2.8K POLED 触摸屏。
Yoga Slim 7i Ultra 14 的竞争对手包括其他旗舰 14 英寸子笔记本，如 微星 Prestige 14 AI+, 戴尔 XPS 14, 华硕 Zenbook 14或 HP OmniBook Ultra 14.
更多联想评测：
规格
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 355 8c/8t, 4 x 4.7 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core, 4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core, 51 W PL2 / Short Burst, 33 W PL1 / Sustained, Panther Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Core: 2500 MHz, LPDDR5x, 32.0.101.8509
Memory
32 GB
, LPDDR5x-7467, Soldered, Dual-Channel
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, 10-point capacitive, LEN140WQ+, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Panther Lake-H PCH
Storage
SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, 1024 GB
Weight
978 g, Power Supply: 177 g
Price
1700 USD
Amazon
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
Yoga Slim 7i Ultra 14 与基于 AMD 技术的 Yoga Slim 7a 14 有着非常相似的外部特征。 Yoga Slim 7a 14.不过，我们基于英特尔处理器的版本采用了更小的铰链、稍短的长度和完全不同的主板设计，重量仅为 978 克，大大减轻了重量。这是联想最轻的 14 英寸蛤壳机之一，无需牺牲刚性或像 LG Gram 那样的触摸屏功能。
值得注意的是，铰链的开启角度非常大，可达 170 度左右。
连接性
交流
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1638 (1446-1860)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1742 (1722-1755)
网络摄像头
3.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
维护
维修时需要使用 T5 梅花扳手拆卸底部面板。
可持续性
该系统的顶盖使用了高达 90% 的可回收镁合金，键盘底座使用了 60% 的可回收铝合金，印刷电路板和电池芯分别使用了 100% 的可回收铜和钴，机箱各部分使用了高达 90% 的 PCC 可回收塑料。包装不含塑料，完全可回收。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了交流适配器和文件外，没有任何其他附件。如果在美国购买，通常适用一年有限保修。
输入设备
显示屏
Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 采用了与 Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 完全相同的 OLED 面板，两款笔记本电脑的观看体验基本相同。120 Hz 刷新率、DisplayHDR1000 支持和 1800p 原生分辨率等功能均保持不变。特别是 1800p 原生分辨率，与其他许多 14 英寸屏幕相比，它的密度明显更高，因此在我们的联想笔记本上显示的画面非常清晰。
与 2025 Yoga Slim 7i Aura 的显示屏相比，我们新推出的 2026 Yoga Slim 7i Ultra Aura 的显示屏刷新率提高了一倍，HDR 亮度提高了一倍（在我们的测试中高达 1056 尼特），分辨率提高了 2.25 倍。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LEN140WQ+ tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 501.3 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 488.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.46 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 470.7 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.21 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
calibrated: 0.82
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
87.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.3% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6472 K
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 ATNA40KW05-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 LG Philips 140WUX, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 120 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 BOE0C9E, IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | 2% | -22% | -18% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.3 | 99.9 1% | 100 1% | 64 -36% | 67.1 -32% | 99.7 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 95.3 -5% | 99 -1% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 87.7 | 94.2 7% | 91.8 5% | 66.2 -25% | 68.9 -21% | 96.9 10% |
| Response Times | 48% | -66% | -6472% | -4194% | -73% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.64 ? | 0.4 ? 37% | 1.87 ? -192% | 57.7 ? -8916% | 35.9 ? -5509% | 1.6 ? -150% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.94 ? | 0.5 ? 47% | 1.53 ? -63% | 38.8 ? -4028% | 28 ? -2879% | 2 ? -113% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 479.46 ? | 600 ? | 480 ? | 480 | ||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 50 | 20 60% | 22 56% | 28 44% | ||
| Screen | -32% | -27% | -46% | -53% | -53% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 470.7 | 485 3% | 292 -38% | 561.2 19% | 359.5 -24% | 372 -21% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 488 | 488 0% | 292 -40% | 505 3% | 361 -26% | 376 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 98 4% | 98 4% | 85 -10% | 92 -2% | 97 3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.01 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.21 | 2.1 5% | 1.4 37% | 2.09 5% | 1.64 26% | 1.96 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.02 | 6.79 -35% | 2.2 56% | 4.37 13% | 4.68 7% | 4.02 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.82 | 1.81 -121% | 1.09 -33% | 0.97 -18% | 1.96 -139% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.6 | 1.1 -83% | 1.7 -183% | 2.5 -317% | 2.6 -333% | 1.94 -223% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.219 99% | 2.12 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 6472 100% | 6338 103% | 6510 100% | 6760 96% | 6388 102% | 6530 100% |
| Contrast (:1) | 29200 | 2551 | 1331 | 37200 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
-6% | -30% /
-30% | -2180% /
-1111% | -1422% /
-734% | -41% /
-45% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏根据 P3 标准进行了良好校准，平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别仅为 0.6 和 2.21。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.45 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.49 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.34 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 479.46 Hz Amplitude: 50 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 479.46 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 479.46 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7898 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
黑豹湖 核心超 7 355与去年的 Lunar Lake 酷睿至尊 7 258V在处理器性能方面不相上下。升级到 酷睿至尊 7预计多线程性能将大幅提升 60%。
请注意，降级到价格较低的 酷睿至尊 5 325配置几乎没有性能损失。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Intel Core Ultra 7 355: Ø1608 (1599.3-1707.14)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 7 445: Ø1561 (1468.75-1706.12)
MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: Ø2083 (1828.99-3089.52)
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Intel Core Ultra 7 355: Ø1536 (1489.92-1654.26)
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375: Ø3092 (2930.19-3334.44)
Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H Intel Core Ultra 7 255H: Ø1908 (1543.21-2862.25)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Geekbench 6.6 / Multi-Core | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (11394 - 11702, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 21QG001VGE | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Geekbench 6.6 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 21QG001VGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (2701 - 2769, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (14.3 - 14.6, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra 5 325 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 21QG001VGE | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM3402Y | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 Core i7-1265U | |
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 -1! | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 -1! | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 -1! | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (12228 - 12305, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (60741 - 63504, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (2763 - 2841, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (4597 - 4600, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (32404 - 34150, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (39050 - 39424, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (635 - 646, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (6147 - 6594, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (57998 - 60240, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (2790 - 2802, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8047 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (97301 - 105135, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (79551 - 85021, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (103056 - 108621, n=2) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 355 (99.7 - 105.8, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
传输速率 SK Hynix PCIe4 固态硬盘与 Yoga Slim 7a 14 中的美光固态硬盘相比，SK Hynix PCIe4 固态硬盘的传输速率要稳定得多，如下图 DiskSpd 循环图所示。
SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6588 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5870 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
559.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
421.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3702 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1901 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
75.86 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
134.7 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6549 (4898.47-6601.84)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Micron 2600 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QHK; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5942 (3026.19-7014.76)
图形处理器性能
豹湖 豹湖 Xe3 4iGPU 比上一代产品有了很大改进 Iris Xe 96 EUs96 EUs 相比有了相当大的改进。性能水平与竞争产品 Radeon 860M甚至略快。
升级至酷睿 Ultra X7 Arc B390配置将大幅提升图形性能，约为 GeForce RTX 3050-游戏性能。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 6837 | 19167 | 2219 |
| 均衡模式 | 6610 (-3%) | 19460 (-0%) | 2157 (-3%) |
| 电池电量 | 6762 (-1%) | 19235 (-0%) | 2197 (-1%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7980 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28082 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6150 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3163 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 | |
F1 24 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL: Ø20.8 (19.5-21.6)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 169.3 | 164.3 | 53.7 | 21.6 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105.1 | 82.1 | 79.5 | 74.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 68.4 | 36.6 | 26.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 40.5 | 31 | 31.1 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 190.6 | 69.7 | 60 | 52.1 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 33 | 27.1 | 23.5 | 23 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 38.6 | 29.5 | 25.5 | 21.5 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 67.2 | 64.1 | 46.1 | 14.7 |
排放量
系统噪音
在浏览网页或流媒体时，系统几乎无声无息地运行，但当负载较高时，内部风扇的噪音会迅速增大。例如，在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，风扇噪音在启动后不到一分钟就达到了约 44 dB(A) 的最大值。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.4 / 25.5 / 25.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 44.4 / 45.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.1 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 1% | 11% | 6% | 7% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.1 | 24 -4% | 25.4 -10% | 23 -0% | 23.8 -3% | 24 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.4 | 24 6% | 25.4 -0% | 23 9% | 24.9 2% | 24 6% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.5 | 25 2% | 25.4 -0% | 23 10% | 24.9 2% | 24 6% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.5 | 26 -2% | 25.4 -0% | 23.1 9% | 24.9 2% | 24 6% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 44.4 | 40 10% | 33.1 25% | 30.8 31% | 32.9 26% | 38.21 14% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 43.4 | 37 15% | 46.5 -7% | 35.4 18% | 40.9 6% | 39.05 10% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 45.5 | 43 5% | 46.5 -2% | 45.9 -1% | 43 5% | 39.05 14% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在高负荷运行时，表面温度也相对较低。热点最高温度仅为 34 摄氏度，而 HP OmniBook Ultra 14 则超过 43 摄氏度。 惠普 OmniBook Ultra 14.
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.6 °C / 76.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+4.1 °C / 7.4 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.6 °C / 76.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+4.1 °C / 7.4 F).
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -30% | -24% | -4% | -31% | -31% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 33.6 | 45 -34% | 47.1 -40% | 37.8 -12% | 40.4 -20% | 40 -19% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 28.8 | 46 -60% | 46.2 -60% | 38.6 -34% | 43.6 -51% | 47 -63% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 25.2 | 27 -7% | 24.3 4% | 21.2 16% | 31 -23% | 29 -15% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 24.6 | 29 -18% | 24.5 -0% | 21.4 13% | 32.2 -31% | 31 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 会提升至 3.6 GHz、51 W 和 98 C，然后在 30 秒后下降并稳定在 3.1 GHz、32 W 和 79 C。因此，Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14 的 Turbo Boost 潜力有限。
在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，GPU 时钟频率和温度分别稳定在 2500 MHz 和 78 C，几乎与我们在竞争对手 XPS 14在类似条件下的记录。
| CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 41 |
| Prime95 压力 | 3.1 | -- | 79 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.4 | 2400 | 74 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.4 | 2500 | 78 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
运行 Prime95 时的耗电量比采用 AMD 技术的 Yoga Slim 7a 14尽管我们的英特尔 CPU 比 Ryzen AI 400 快 20%，每瓦性能更胜一筹。同样，当 GPU 受到压力时，性能和每瓦性能也会对英特尔略微有利。
当 CPU 处于完全受压状态时，我们可以通过小型（约 5.5 x 5.5 x 2.9 厘米）65 W USB-C AC 适配器测量到 69 W 的临时最大功率。根据我们在 XPS 16 SKU 上的使用经验，使用速度更快的酷睿 Ultra X7 的配置要求一般会稍高一些。 XPS 16 SKU.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.19 / 0.47 Watt |
| Idle | 3.2 / 3.9 / 12.3 Watt |
| Load |
36.5 / 69 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M, Micron 2600 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QHK, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Phison 1 TB ESR01TBTCCZ-27J, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -18% | 1% | 16% | -17% | 12% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.2 | 5.1 -59% | 2.8 13% | 1.6 50% | 2.7 16% | 3 6% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 3.9 | 5.3 -36% | 4.2 -8% | 3.7 5% | 5.4 -38% | 3.5 10% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 12.3 | 6.2 50% | 4.5 63% | 3.9 68% | 5.5 55% | 4.2 66% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 36.5 | 58 -59% | 48.9 -34% | 36 1% | 67.4 -85% | 52.3 -43% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 51.1 | 57.3 -12% | 59.9 -17% | 50.9 -0% | 67.9 -33% | 32.7 36% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 50.6 | 54.8 -8% | 58.6 -16% | 47.7 6% | 67.8 -34% | 49.8 2% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 69 | 72 -4% | 64 7% | 80 -16% | 68.3 1% | 66 4% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø60.3 (56.6-69)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø60.8 (56.8-64.7)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.39 (2.98-9.32)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.31 (5.09-6.19)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø51.1 (49.8-55.7)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø57.3 (52.5-60.8)
外部显示器功耗
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø52.3 (47.4-68)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø57.2 (54.7-71.6)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø57.8 (53.8-64.9)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø52.8 (46.1-62.4)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø57.7 (55-72)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø47 (44.5-50.9)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø59.4 (55.3-63.9)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.08 (2.7-7.27)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.09 (4.37-7.58)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø50.6 (49.5-55.1)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø54.8 (46.4-66.2)
电池寿命
近 11 小时的无线局域网运行时间非常出色，尤其是对于采用 120 Hz OLED 的系统而言。
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M, 70 Wh | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 81 Wh | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 70 Wh | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Radeon 890M, 68 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, 75 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -15% | 85% | 37% | 4% | 45% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 10.6 | 9 -15% | 19.6 85% | 14.5 37% | 11 4% | 15.4 45% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 36.6 | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.5 | 2.7 | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 12.2 |
笔记本检查评级
联想 Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14 Aura Edition 是专为那些既想要最轻的 14 英寸 OLED 系统，又想要英特尔最新 CPU 技术的旅行者打造的。
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11
- 04/24/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.4%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1700 USD | 978 g | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
2. 84.1%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 ⎘ AMD Radeon 840M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1299 EUR | 1.2 kg | 14 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
3. 84.2%  | MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ 2026 Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,949.00 MSI Prestige 14 AI Studio C1... 2. $1,095.95 MSI Prestige 13 AI+ Evo (202... 3. $1,474.57 msi Prestige A16 AI+ (2025) ... List Price: 1549€ | 1.4 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
4. 84.8%  | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,049.00 Dell XPS 14 9440 14.5" Noteb... 2. $794.11 Dell 14 Plus Laptop DB14250-... 3. $729.99 Dell 14 Plus Laptop DB14250-... List Price: 1600 USD | 1.5 kg | 15.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
5. 88%  | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1030 USD | 1.5 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI IPS |
6. 87.6%  | Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 7 255H Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1599 Euro | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
