Notebookcheck Logo

微星Cubi AI+ 3MG比以前快了60%以上,但它本可以做得更好

在某些笔记本电脑上,微星Cubi 3MG采用的相同酷睿Ultra 9 386H处理器的运行速度可提高25
ⓘ Notebookcheck
在某些笔记本电脑上,微星Cubi 3MG采用的相同酷睿Ultra 9 386H处理器的运行速度可提高25
与 Cubi AI+ 2MG 的 CPU 相比,其 Panther Lake-H CPU 的尺寸令人印象深刻,是一个巨大的升级,但超小的外形在一定程度上影响了性能。
Review Snippet Mini PC Panther Lake MSI

最新 微星最新的 2026 Cubi NUC微星最新的 2026 Cubi NUC 配备了 H 系列 Panther Lake CPU,取代了去年型号上的 Lunar Lake CPU。 去年的型号.Panther Lake CPU的运行速度比上一代的Lunar Lake CPU快得多,因为2026 Cubi NUC中的CPU也可以在游戏笔记本电脑上找到,如 雷蛇刀锋 16.不过,在微星迷你 PC 上,为了实现更小的外形尺寸,还是做出了一些妥协。

从下面的对比图中可以看出 酷睿至尊 9 386HCubi NUC AI+ 3MG 的 CPU 速度比 酷睿至尊 7 258V快 60% 以上。功耗也仅高出几瓦,因此要获得显著的性能优势,只需将功耗要求提高 8%,即可获得卓越的每瓦性能。

将新款微星迷你 PC 与采用相同 Core Ultra 9 386H CPU 的笔记本电脑进行比较时,问题就出现了。以 Razer Blade 16 为例,由于其外形尺寸更大、散热能力更强,运行速度比微星电脑快 20% 至 25%。与此同时,微星同样的 CPU 只能维持 20 秒左右的 Turbo Boost 时钟率,然后就需要节流,下面的 CineBench R15 xT 分数和运行 Prime95 时的功耗峰值就是例证。

2026 Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG 无疑比前代产品有了巨大进步,但考虑到酷睿 Ultra 9 386H 在其他机器上的性能,它本可以更快。

Cinebench R15 多回路运行

065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170123513001365143014951560162516901755182018851950201520802145221022752340240524702535260026652730279528602925299030553120Tooltip
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H: Ø2385 (2352.8-2791.74)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1475 (1459.06-1488.32)
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Intel Core Ultra 9 386H: Ø2941 (2806.23-3172.09)
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance rating
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
86.6 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
73.7 pt
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
58.1 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
20750 (18849.5min - 20749.6max) Points +22%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
17015 (15002.4min - 17015.3max) Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
10524 (10414.4min - 10524.2max) Points -38%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2087 Points +4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2010 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1957 Points -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
8162 Points +21%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
6724 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
4121 Points -39%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
795 Points +4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
767 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
741 Points -3%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
3172 (2806.23min - 3172.09max) Points +14%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2792 (2352.8min - 2791.74max) Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1488 (1459.06min - 1488.32max) Points -47%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
313 Points +13%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
297 Points +8%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
276 Points
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
326 Seconds * -55%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
210 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
171 Seconds * +19%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
71655 MIPS +24%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
57560 MIPS
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
34645 MIPS -40%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
6367 MIPS +16%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
5816 MIPS +6%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
5488 MIPS
Geekbench 6.6 / Multi-Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
16903 Points +18%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
14323 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
8964 Points -37%
Geekbench 6.6 / Single-Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2886 Points +4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2778 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
2748 Points -1%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
17017 Points +19%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
14283 Points
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
7574 Points -47%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
2109 Points +6%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
2022 Points +2%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
1992 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
24.5 fps +26%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
19.5 fps
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
13.3 fps -32%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
54.3 s *
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
45.1 s * +17%
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
38.5 s * +29%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
0.4505 sec * -4%
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
0.4326 sec *
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
0.4096 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

外部显示器功耗

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø56.3 (51-98.4)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (36.7-60)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø51.1 (48.8-53.7)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø34 (20.7-43)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø47.6 (46.4-51.5)
MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø41.1 (26.8-58.9)
Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 新闻 > 新闻档案 > 新闻档案 2026 06 > 微星Cubi AI+ 3MG比以前快了60%以上,但它本可以做得更好
Allen Ngo, 2026-06- 4 (Update: 2026-06- 4)