Notebookcheck Logo

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH回顾。带有120赫兹大屏幕的Ryzen 5000笔记本电脑

Ryzen和16:10的大众化。 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH可能是16:10显示屏和AMD处理器的趋势相结合的结果。这款多媒体笔记本电脑以其不太宽的大尺寸、高分辨率120赫兹液晶显示器和快速的Ryzen 5000H CPU脱颖而出。
AMD Cezanne (Zen 3) Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

传统上，15英寸显示屏的笔记本电脑一直是消费领域最受欢迎的机型。大显示屏为文件、游戏和多媒体内容提供了大量空间；同时，大尺寸笔记本电脑往往有可能更强大。然而，2021年出现了一个新的趋势。连同从16:9到16:10的转变，显示屏尺寸从15.6英寸增加到16英寸。这方面的一个例子是联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH。

这并不是联想笔记本电脑采用的唯一趋势。自Ryzen 4000系列发布以来，AMD处理器在笔记本电脑市场上掀起了热潮，而联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH采用了最新的Zen 3处理器--型号中的 "ACH "代表 "AMD Cezanne-H"。凭借强大的H处理器和NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650，这款联想笔记本电脑瞄准了多媒体市场。

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH (IdeaPad 5 Pro Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 57 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1155 MHz, Memory: 1250 MHz, 30 W TDP, TU117, 457.56, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, on-board, dual-channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, IPS LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280, NVMe PCIe 3.0, 476 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC3287
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: 4-in-1 SD
Networking
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.5 x 356 x 251
Battery
75 Wh Lithium-Ion
Camera
Webcam: 720p w/IR
Additional features
Speakers: 2-watt stereo, Keyboard: six-row chiclet with numpad, Keyboard Light: yes, 135-watt slim tip charger, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.977 kg, Power Supply: 389 g
Price
950 Euro
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.1 %
09/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		2 kg17.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
81.2 %
07/2021
HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450		1.7 kg17.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.2 %
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450		1.7 kg16 mm15.60"3200x2000
84.5 %
09/2020
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
R5 4600H, Vega 6		1.7 kg16.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
83.4 %
12/2020
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350		1.8 kg16.1 mm15.60"1920x1080

外壳。联想IdeaPad的深色铝壳

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH

在设计方面，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH与联想IdeaPad系列的许多其他笔记本电脑相比并不突出。摄像头区域有轻微的反向凹槽，方便打开盖子，宽大的铰链，以及掌托右边缘垂直排列的联想标志--这是现代联想笔记本电脑的典型设计特征。外壳完全采用 "风暴灰 "的深灰色，键盘的颜色也与之匹配。唯一的颜色对比是由联想标志周围的金属边框提供的，除了触摸板左边的贴纸巡游。总而言之，这是一个现代、简约的设计。

铝的使用确保了高质量的感觉；塑料只出现在显示屏边框和铰链的区域。不过，这不是CNC加工的铝的事实在显示屏区域是很明显的。虽然基本单元对扭转有很强的抵抗力，但屏幕可以被扭转一下。另一方面，盖子对施加在屏幕背面的压力反应良好，因为对显示屏没有明显的影响。键盘和掌托不能被压住，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的做工毫无瑕疵。

屏幕可以用一只手打开，但只能达到160度的打开角度。在摇晃的环境中，显示屏会有一些晃动，这看起来不是很精致，但也不是很夸张。

凭借16:10格式的16英寸显示屏，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH比竞争对手更长，但换来的宽度却略显不足--尤其是与Honor MagicBook Pro 16 。在我们比较的多媒体笔记本电脑中，联想笔记本电脑的重量也是最重的。

Size comparison

❌
369 mm 234 mm 16.9 mm 1.7 kg360.2 mm 234 mm 17.9 mm 1.7 kg359.8 mm 233.8 mm 16.1 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 251 mm 17.5 mm 2 kg351 mm 242 mm 16 mm 1.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性。带SD读卡器的联想笔记本电脑

有趣的是，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH所选择的GPU配置在涉及到端口时产生了差异。带有专用GPU的变体，如我们的测试设备，在左侧有一个专有的细长充电端口。没有Nvidia图形芯片的型号在其位置上有一个额外的USB-C端口。联想笔记本电脑也可以通过这里的USB-C端口充电。

这些连接符合我们对多媒体笔记本电脑的期望，我们特别喜欢全尺寸SD读卡器和HDMI端口。遗憾的是，不支持Thunderbolt，但这是由于使用的是AMD平台。

左边：超薄充电端口，HDMI 2.0，USB-C 3.2 Gen 2，3.5毫米音频插孔
左边：超薄充电端口，HDMI 2.0，USB-C 3.2 Gen 2，3.5毫米音频插孔
右边。SD读卡器，2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1
右边。SD读卡器，2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1

SD卡阅读器

没有一个对比的笔记本电脑有全尺寸的SD卡读卡器。虽然联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的读卡器不能完全容纳卡片，但它的存在就是一个很大的优势--尽管联想笔记本电脑的读卡器只能提供平均速度。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.6 - 205, n=65, last 2 years)
93.6 MB/s +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
  (AV PRO V60)
76.1 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-eg
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
66.7 MB/s -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.8 - 266, n=61, last 2 years)
123.2 MB/s +40%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
  (AV PRO V60)
87.7 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-eg
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77.8 MB/s -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25.9 MB/s -70%

沟通

尽管联想可以宣传其IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH带有 "Wi-Fi 6"，但在现实中并没有留下多少。安装在联想笔记本电脑中的Realtek 2x2模块令人失望，传输速率低，远远落后于目前的英特尔解决方案。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 (686min - 1498max) MBit/s +77%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1197 (1057min - 1282max) MBit/s +49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
804 (670min - 867max) MBit/s
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (424 - 928, n=20)
787 MBit/s -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
670 (647min - 687max) MBit/s -17%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
646 (548min - 695max) MBit/s -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (285 - 998, n=2, last 2 years)
642 MBit/s -20%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1434 (1199min - 1500max) MBit/s +122%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1017 - 1675, n=2, last 2 years)
1346 MBit/s +108%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1343 (650min - 1573max) MBit/s +108%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
902 (860min - 921max) MBit/s +40%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (621 - 877, n=20)
745 MBit/s +15%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
671 (639min - 690max) MBit/s +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
646 (604min - 699max) MBit/s
604649694739784829Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø645 (604-699)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (670-867)

网络摄像头

放在联想IdeaPad 5 Pro液晶显示器上方的720p网络摄像头提供低于平均水平的图像质量，这是大多数笔记本电脑的典型缺陷。然而，它足以进行视频通话，至少在良好的光线下。

ColorChecker
18.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
15 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH: 9.15 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 18.79 ∆E

辅料

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的包装只包含一个135瓦的电源适配器，有一个细长的接头。没有包括其他配件。

维护

一共有9颗TX5螺丝和一些夹子将底盖固定在一起。螺丝没有留在箱子里，所以你必须小心不要把它们弄丢。最好是用一个塑料铲子工具来松开夹子，但信用卡或拨浪鼓也可以做到这一点。

令我们失望的是，我们在联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的内部只发现了一些可升级的组件。用户可以很容易地升级M.2-2280固态硬盘和M.2-2230 Wi-Fi模块，但内存是完全焊接的。其他维护选项包括更换内部电池和清洁冷却系统。

内部视图 - 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
内部视图 - 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH

担保

对于像联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH这样的消费类笔记本电脑来说，24个月的带入保修期是标准的。有趣的是，联想还为这一型号的产品提供了额外费用的延长保修期，最大可能是48个月的现场服务。

平均输入设备。联想笔记本电脑

键盘

像绝大多数这个尺寸的联想笔记本电脑一样，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH也有一个数字键盘。因此，键盘向左偏移了一些。此外，在没有数字键盘的情况下，一些按键，如回车键，也许可以更宽一点。对于输入大量数字的用户来说，数字键盘可能是非常有用的。不过，如果能选择没有数字键盘的联想笔记本电脑，那就更理想了。

两段式背光键盘及其圆形的按键提供了良好的打字体验。联想IdeaPad并不是最顶级的，键盘当然也不能与联想ThinkPad相提并论，但你仍然可以毫无问题地输入较长的文字。压力点可以更明确一些，行程也相当短，这在现在很常见。

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的键盘区域
联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的键盘区域

触摸板

一个大的塑料触摸板作为唯一的鼠标替代品。12 x 7.5厘米，比联想ThinkPad系列的触摸板要大，比如说。它是一个具有经典机械结构的触摸板，这意味着它只能在下部区域进行点击。

在软件实现方面，没有什么可抱怨的。触摸板对WindowsPrecision 驱动程序的手势反应完美，而且可以准确地控制鼠标指针。我们对硬件本身没有特别深刻的印象；塑料表面感觉质量不高，点击机制也是如此。这是一个好的触摸板，但显然不是优质硬件。

120赫兹的16：10显示屏是联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的亮点。

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的子像素矩阵
联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的子像素矩阵
轻微的背光出血（在此以强化的方式显示）。
轻微的背光出血（在此以强化的方式显示）。

如果你购买联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH，你不需要太担心选择哪种显示屏。这款联想笔记本电脑只提供16英寸WQXGA液晶显示器（2560x1600）。这块IPS显示屏是哑光的，应该能提供350cd/m²的亮度，而且是一块非触摸液晶屏。尽管如此，还是有两种LCD选择，因为联想为AMD IdeaPad提供了60 Hz面板以及120 Hz显示器。否则，关键规格是相同的。

我们的测试设备配备了120赫兹的变体--在日常使用中，当你在桌面上滚动或拖动窗口时，这是很明显的，因为有额外的平滑度，而且你在游戏中也受益于加倍的刷新率。恰当的是，该显示器具有快速的响应时间。联想笔记本电脑的显示屏在其他方面也很有说服力。广告中的亮度值超过了约25cd/m²，因为显示器发出了约375cd/m²的亮度。

383
cd/m²		387
cd/m²		379
cd/m²
376
cd/m²		395
cd/m²		367
cd/m²
375
cd/m²		357
cd/m²		358
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 375.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.39 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 394 cd/m²
Contrast: 1234:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
73.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00		HP Pavilion 15-eg
Chi Mei CMN1523, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
IPS, 3200x2000, 15.60		Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
N161HCA-EA3, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10		Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Panda LM156LF-5L04, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-38%
-5%
-13%
-44%
Display P3 Coverage
71
42.9
-40%
66.7
-6%
67.5
-5%
39.01
-45%
sRGB Coverage
99
64
-35%
96.3
-3%
69.7
-30%
58.5
-41%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
73.3
44.4
-39%
68.5
-7%
69.7
-5%
40.33
-45%
Response Times
-67%
-143%
-106%
-170%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.4 ?(6.4, 10)
22.8 ?(10, 12.8)
-39%
34.8 ?(17.2, 17.6)
-112%
37.6 ?(18.8, 18.8)
-129%
38 ?(19, 19)
-132%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
23.6 ?(13.6, 10)
-168%
24 ?(12.4, 11.6)
-173%
25.6 ?(14, 11.6)
-191%
27 ?(15, 12)
-207%
PWM Frequency
24940 ?(50)
26320 ?(43)
6%
25250 ?(30)
1%
Screen
-67%
-47%
33%
-77%
Brightness middle
395
294.3
-25%
312
-21%
337
-15%
287
-27%
Brightness
375
251
-33%
298
-21%
312
-17%
261
-30%
Brightness Distribution
90
76
-16%
87
-3%
89
-1%
84
-7%
Black Level *
0.32
0.26
19%
0.18
44%
0.2
37%
0.51
-59%
Contrast
1234
1132
-8%
1733
40%
1685
37%
563
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
4.08
-57%
5.39
-107%
0.8
69%
4.72
-82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.4
19.49
-261%
9.95
-84%
1.1
80%
17.94
-232%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.1
3.7
-236%
3.15
-186%
0.7
36%
3.74
-240%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.4
3
12%
6.3
-85%
1
71%
2.2
35%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.21 100%
2.192 100%
2.2 100%
2.51 88%
CCT
6140 106%
6616 98%
7473 87%
6538 99%
6758 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
69
63.8
37
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
99.5
58
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-57% / -61%
-65% / -52%
-29% / -4%
-97% / -83%

* ... smaller is better

色彩再现
色彩再现
灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
色彩再现（已校准
色彩再现（已校准
灰度(已校准)
灰度(已校准)
饱和度（已校准
饱和度（已校准

根据我们用CalMan软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2色度计的测量，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的色彩还原有点太出格。用色度计和X-Rite i1Profiler软件进行校准，能够消除色差，使色彩再现接近理想。在对比度方面还有一些改进的余地，因为它只配得上 "好 "的分数，而不是 "非常好 "的分数，比例为1234:1。

色彩空间的覆盖率也很好。由于几乎完全覆盖了 "小 "sRGB色彩空间，在日常使用中，大多数颜色都能正确显示，而且可以进行简单的图像编辑。

sRGB: 99%
sRGB: 99%
AdobeRGB: 73.3%
AdobeRGB: 73.3%
DCI-P3: 71%
DCI-P3: 71%
室外（阳光充足，在阴凉处
室外（阳光充足，在阴凉处

从200cd/m²开始，你可以说一个显示器最低限度地适合于户外使用。由于这里安装的面板更进一步，达到375cd/m²，同时具有哑光表面，所以联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH可以在户外使用而没有问题。如果可能的话，你应该避免将面板暴露在阳光直射下。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.4 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 24940 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 24940 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 24940 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

作为IPS型面板的典型代表，可视角度的稳定性是无懈可击的。

使用AMD Cezanne-H和Nvidia Turing的强大性能

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH有三种不同的处理器：AMD Ryzen 5 5600H ，Ryzen 7 5800H ， Ryzen 9 5900HX 。在某些配置中，联想没有为这些强大的AMD CPU提供dGPU；因此，AMD Radeon iGPU作为图形芯片--但在大多数情况下，dGPU很可能已经安装，要么是NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650或 RTX 3050.所有配置中的DDR4-3200内存都是焊接的，有8、16和32GB内存的变种。一块M.2-2280固态硬盘被用作大容量存储设备。

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z AMD Radeon
GPU-Z AMD Radeon
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z缓存
CPU-Z缓存
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z内存

处理器

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H是Cezanne H系列的Zen 3处理器，具有八个核心和16个线程。作为H系列CPU，该处理器的典型TDP为45瓦，最大时钟速度为4.4GHz（基础时钟速度为3.2GHz）。在我们的CPU基准测试文章 ，你可以将Ryzen处理器与当前其他处理芯片进行比较。

该处理器的最大消耗为57瓦，但这只是几秒钟的情况。从长远来看，AMD Ryzen处理器的消耗量稳定在35瓦。有了这些速率，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH显然是测试领域中最快的多媒体笔记本电脑，至少当所有核心都处于负载状态时。如果只有一个核心被加载，采用英特尔CPU的笔记本电脑就有优势。

我们注意到CPU的性能在电池供电时有一个限制。在没有连接电源适配器的情况下，CPU的性能大约降低了14%。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

618.8718.8818.8918.81018.81118.81218.81318.81418.81518.81618.81718.81818.81918.8Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1945 (1923.82-1971.51)
HP Pavilion 15-eg Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø725 (618.81-762.14)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Variable PL1 : Ø928 (765.3-1048.55)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Pl1 @ 25W: Ø792 (781.11-959.72)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; PL1 fixed @ 28W: Ø849 (836.45-917.33)
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) AMD Ryzen 5 4600H: Ø1361 (1342.69-1420)
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø731 (710.18-922.13)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (921.15-990.11)
Cinebench R23: Single Core | Multi Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2110, n=97, last 2 years)
1711 Points +23%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1529 Points +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1512 Points +9%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1495 Points +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1431 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1294 - 1441, n=29)
1410 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1386 Points
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (4624 - 30789, n=99, last 2 years)
14099 Points +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (8812 - 13214, n=29)
11794 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11727 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
6465 Points -45%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5639 Points -52%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5344 (4894.88min - 5344.23max) Points -54%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5156 Points -56%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4947 (4868.64min - 4947.48max) Points -58%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=95, last 2 years)
645 Points +19%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
589 Points +9%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
585 Points +8%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
575 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (502 - 560, n=30)
550 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
548 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
542 Points
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
452 Points -17%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (1783 - 11768, n=95, last 2 years)
5314 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4575 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (3430 - 5020, n=31)
4568 Points 0%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3234 Points -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
2382 Points -48%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
2152 Points -53%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2001 Points -56%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1908 Points -58%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (142.6 - 308, n=97, last 2 years)
251 Points +12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
231 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (209 - 234, n=29)
228 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
224 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
221 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
220 Points -2%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
176 Points -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
176 Points -21%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (785 - 4703, n=104, last 2 years)
2311 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1972 (1923.82min - 1971.51max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1487 - 2119, n=28)
1963 Points 0%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1420 (1342.69min - 1420max) Points -28%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1049 (765.3min - 1048.55max) Points -47%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
960 (781.11min - 959.72max) Points -51%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
917 (836.45min - 917.33max) Points -53%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
990 Points -50%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
922 Points -53%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
762 (618.81min - 762.14max) Points -61%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
603 Seconds * -132%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
578 Seconds * -122%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
542 Seconds * -108%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
538 Seconds * -107%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
356 Seconds * -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 662, n=93, last 2 years)
267 Seconds * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
260 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (237 - 340, n=29)
260 Seconds * -0%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7163, n=88, last 2 years)
5639 MIPS +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5038 - 5632, n=29)
5472 MIPS +3%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5416 MIPS +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5411 MIPS +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5396 MIPS +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5292 MIPS
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4947 MIPS -7%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4334 MIPS -18%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia
  (20166 - 119900, n=88, last 2 years)
57072 MIPS +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (45773 - 59986, n=28)
54117 MIPS +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
52444 MIPS
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
38185 MIPS -27%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
25382 MIPS -52%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
25353 MIPS -52%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
23940 MIPS -54%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22655 MIPS -57%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2342, n=98, last 2 years)
1756 Points +23%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1574 Points +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1557 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1336 - 1505, n=28)
1450 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1447 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1431 Points
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1117 Points -22%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Multimedia
  (3828 - 23059, n=98, last 2 years)
11326 Points +52%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (6551 - 9062, n=28)
7793 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7438 Points
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
6080 Points -18%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5214 Points -30%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5055 Points -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4905 Points -34%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.99 - 30.5, n=86, last 2 years)
15.5 fps +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (11.6 - 16.1, n=29)
14.5 fps +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13.8 fps
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.79 fps -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.08 fps -49%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
6.91 fps -50%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.59 fps -52%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.21 fps -55%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47.4 - 113, n=29)
64.3 s * -36%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
62.5 s * -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
52.4 s * -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 84.9, n=90, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
47.4 s *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.3 s * -0%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
44.2 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.627 sec * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.604 sec * -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.568 sec * -4%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.56 sec * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.552 sec * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.544 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (0.511 - 0.559, n=28)
0.525 sec * +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3826 - 0.723, n=88, last 2 years)
0.4816 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1972 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
160 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
224 Points
Help

系统性能

对于拥有这些组件的笔记本电脑，PCMark中的系统性能略低于平均水平。然而，这足以让该笔记本电脑在测试领域中名列前茅。说到联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH在日常使用中的系统性能，绝对没有什么可抱怨的。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (4635 - 8670, n=83, last 2 years)
6586 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (5862 - 6217, n=2)
6040 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
5862 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5814 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5625 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5333 Points -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5306 Points -9%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5001 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=83, last 2 years)
10459 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (10001 - 10031, n=2)
10016 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10001 Points
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9833 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8931 Points -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8930 Points -11%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8888 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
8568 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
9662 Points +18%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9292 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (8218 - 9225, n=2)
8722 Points +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5845 - 11186, n=83, last 2 years)
8708 Points +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8554 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8519 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8218 Points
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7209 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Multimedia
  (4688 - 13548, n=83, last 2 years)
8636 Points +30%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (6650 - 7048, n=2)
6849 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6650 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5880 Points -12%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5839 Points -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5388 Points -19%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5330 Points -20%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5299 Points -20%
PCMark 10 Score
5862 points
Help

DPC延迟

不幸的是，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH在高DPC延迟上挣扎。一个网络驱动程序显然是这里的罪魁祸首。

延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
655 μs *
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
629 μs * +4%

* ... smaller is better

储存

美光公司的512GB M.2-2280固态硬盘被用作该模型的大容量存储设备。这是一款快速的NVMe PCIe 3.0固态硬盘，当涉及到4K写入时有一些小的弱点。然而，这在日常使用中不太可能被注意到。

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV		HP Pavilion 15-eg
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G		Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G		Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8		Average Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
 
AS SSD
7%
-46%
42%
-3%
-8%
Seq Read
2643
2030
-23%
1972
-25%
2749
4%
1754
-34%
2300 ?(1362 - 2960, n=6)
-13%
Seq Write
1510
1003
-34%
981
-35%
2348
55%
1567
4%
1550 ?(976 - 2586, n=6)
3%
4K Read
42.86
46.74
9%
55.8
30%
44.22
3%
53
24%
45 ?(38.4 - 49.8, n=6)
5%
4K Write
85.5
164.2
92%
133.5
56%
140.5
64%
167.9
96%
106.6 ?(85.5 - 127.1, n=6)
25%
4K-64 Read
768
1098
43%
1277
66%
1450
89%
586
-24%
676 ?(371 - 855, n=6)
-12%
4K-64 Write
1983
891
-55%
313.9
-84%
2346
18%
858
-57%
1616 ?(1054 - 2015, n=6)
-19%
Access Time Read *
0.103
0.053
49%
0.15
-46%
0.079
23%
0.097
6%
0.059 ?(0.037 - 0.103, n=6)
43%
Access Time Write *
0.101
0.062
39%
0.513
-408%
0.027
73%
0.038
62%
0.1807 ?(0.094 - 0.365, n=6)
-79%
Score Read
1075
1348
25%
1530
42%
1769
65%
815
-24%
952 ?(545 - 1197, n=6)
-11%
Score Write
2220
1155
-48%
546
-75%
2721
23%
1182
-47%
1877 ?(1319 - 2370, n=6)
-15%
Score Total
3797
3149
-17%
2819
-26%
5376
42%
2421
-36%
3290 ?(2160 - 4170, n=6)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Sequential Read: 2643MB/s
Sequential Write: 1510MB/s
4K Read: 42.86MB/s
4K Write: 85.5MB/s
4K-64 Read: 768MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1983MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.103ms
Access Time Write: 0.101ms
Score Read: 1075Points
Score Write: 2220Points
Score Total: 3797Points

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650
GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650

NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650是 "图灵 "一代中最不强大的GTX芯片。在这种情况下，它配备了4GB的专用GDDR6内存，896个着色器单元的最大时钟速度为1,155 MHz。使用我们的GPU基准测试表 ，可以与其他图形芯片进行比较。

联想允许GTX消耗大约30瓦的功率。从这个角度来看，较新的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 ，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH中也有，其TGP（总图形功率）据说是35瓦。为了显示3050的潜力，我们在比较中包括了宏碁Nitro 5；它的速度快48%至61%。

与所有GTX 1650笔记本电脑的平均结果相比，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的表现低于平均水平。它落后于平均水平约12%。尽管如此，这足以在经济实惠的多媒体笔记本电脑中名列前茅。联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU，配备英特尔Tiger Lake CPU和GeForce MX450 GPU，根据3DMark测试，速度慢16%至33%。

当电源适配器没有插入时，GPU性能下降了约19%。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=87, last 2 years)
18743 Points +63%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11300H
16967 Points +48%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (10885 - 13575, n=30)
12797 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11470 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
9580 Points -16%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
8204 Points -28%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
7983 Points -30%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6332 Points -45%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4589 Points -60%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=88, last 2 years)
13863 Points +67%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11300H
12736 Points +54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (7741 - 9810, n=32)
9195 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8287 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
5573 Points -33%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4753 Points -43%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
4435 Points -46%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4364 Points -47%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3051 Points -63%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=88, last 2 years)
5251 Points +73%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11300H
4888 Points +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (2900 - 3700, n=31)
3430 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
3038 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
2300 Points -24%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1945 Points -36%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1338 Points -56%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
903 Points -70%
3DMark 11 Performance
11801 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7763 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3362 points
Help

游戏性能

Nvidia GTX 1650使联想笔记本电脑能够以全高清显示现代游戏，甚至在非常高的细节水平上。然而，这个GPU并不足以应付4K游戏或VR，但休闲游戏玩家和拥有全高清显示器的用户在这里肯定会得到很好的服务。

即使在连续的负载下，该图形芯片也能提供其性能，没有大的波动。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 290, n=90, last 2 years)
92.7 fps +60%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
84.5 (72min) fps +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (45 - 70.4, n=29)
61.7 fps +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
58 (48min - 63max) fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
42.8 (12.2min, 16.6P0.1, 29.7P1 - 169max) fps -26%
HP Pavilion 15-eg
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
39.7 (36min - 45max) fps -32%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
34 fps -41%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
27 fps -53%
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
18.1 fps -69%

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

1116212631364146Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile: Ø30.6 (28-33)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 i5-11300H, GeForce MX450: Ø26 (25-27)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 i7-11370H, GeForce MX450: Ø19.9 (18-22)
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350: Ø15.8 (11-19)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø45.1 (42-48)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 171 162 91.7 44.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 175 58 32.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 128 122 112 108
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 97 84.6 70
Strange Brigade (2018) 191 73.8 59.4 49.9
F1 2020 (2020) 178 86.5 68.7 48.3

排放物。性能导致联想笔记本电脑的风扇声音很大

噪声排放

杰基尔博士和海德先生--联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH在涉及到风扇噪音时显示了两张脸。当没有负载时，它完全保持沉默。然而，在负载情况下，联想笔记本电脑迅速转速上升--即使在中度负载测试中，在联想Vantage软件的 "智能冷却 "性能模式下进行，风扇运行的声音也达到了41.3分贝（A）。在压力测试和使用Vantage模式 "高性能 "时，冷却系统的声音大了几个级别，最大为52.93 dB(A) - 所以如果你想在联想IdeaPad上玩游戏，你必须考虑到噪音，因为它可能相当恼人。

至少在我们的审查样本中，我们没有注意到任何线圈的啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle
24.04 / 24.04 / 24.04 dB(A)
Load
41.3 / 52.93 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.04 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202424.829.626.22523.226.528.523.33122.222.424.121.44022.928.128.624.85020.422.420.623.86322.218.920.724.18022.917.218.327.310021.816.417.825.612523.420.620.228.116023.421.222.229.920025.415.516.828.625028.216.313.332.13152720.718.633.540029.11819.535.550028.614.512.437.26303010.69.439.480029.59.89.137100030.69.69.639.6125029.910.79.638.1160027.410.49.838.3200029.110.41040.2250030.310.510.541.8315033.611.311.146.640003011.611.443500027.811.711.641.163002511.811.739.380002012.112.135.71000016.711.911.834.11250013.511.811.730.2160001211.611.623.2SPL41.324.223.952.9N3.70.60.68.4median 27.8median 11.8median 11.7median 37Delta4.52.53.24.829.821.322.829.840.526.823.240.534.230.330.834.22420.821.32434.733.419.934.721.21917.221.221.317.513.421.326.718.313.226.725.920.713.525.921.122.313.321.121.424.612.821.420.526.212.120.522.229.611.822.223.229.410.823.222.82810.922.822.9281122.92329.411.22325.633.411.125.624.832.711.724.822.831.111.622.824.934.712.224.922.833.912.522.822.232.712.622.223.332.71323.330.432.513.530.424.232.613.724.221.433.61421.420.133.815.420.117.128.315.517.113.818.313.713.836.544.524.836.52.54.90.62.5median 22.8median 29.6median 12.6median 22.81.53.711.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACHLenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6

温度

压力测试。Prime95 + FurMark
压力测试。Prime95 + FurMark

IdeaPad在典型的办公室使用中几乎没有升温，我们用空闲测试来模拟。另一个典型的场景是游戏，这是用TheWitcher 3 模拟的。我们在这里测量到最高45.2°C（约113°F），但只是在后部的一个热点处。在压力测试中，情况看起来类似。联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH在顶部和底部均匀地发热。最大测量值约为52℃（约126°F）。这是惊人的高，但你通常不应该接触到机箱背面的热点。

在压力测试中没有检测到CPU节流，因为处理器可以连续消耗32瓦特。这可能不足以维持最大的时钟速率，但基本时钟速度可以维持。如果有节流现象，那就是在图形芯片上。在这里，870MHz的时钟速率低于基础时钟速度。尽管如此，在极端压力测试情况下观察到的节流现象不会对日常使用产生负面影响。此外，在压力测试后直接运行的3DMark测试产生了正常的结果。

Max. Load
 42.7 °C51.9 °C42.2 °C 
 33.8 °C44.2 °C32 °C 
 30.2 °C28.7 °C28.5 °C 
Maximum: 51.9 °C
Average: 37.1 °C
39.7 °C51.5 °C38.2 °C
30.6 °C41 °C32.9 °C
29.3 °C31.6 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 51.5 °C
Average: 36.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  49.4 °C | Room Temperature 23.4 °C | Fluke 62 Max+
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.9 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.5 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.4 °C / -2.6 F).
闲置（顶部
闲置（顶部
闲置(底部)
闲置(底部)
负载（顶部
负载（顶部
负载（底部
负载（底部
TheWitcher 3 (top)
TheWitcher 3 (top)
TheWitcher 3 (底部)
TheWitcher 3 (底部)

发言人

无论手头有什么多媒体任务--声音都可能发挥重要作用。这使得联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的内部扬声器如此之差更加令人失望--其最大音量很低，而且低音也完全没有。因此，你应该通过各种手段求助于外部扬声器或耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.6242528.529.53124.1234028.631.75020.626.56320.718.68018.317.710017.821.512520.219.416022.222.220016.832.525013.338.131518.647.740019.550.550012.452.16309.4548009.157.210009.658.912509.659.316009.857.520001058.4250010.557.2315011.153.2400011.456.1500011.652.3630011.754.7800012.156.71000011.859.21250011.759.91600011.660SPL23.968.8N0.623.9median 11.7median 54.7Delta3.29.430.630.32928.229.129.926.629.827.327.923.327.224.225.723.826.322.329.222.736.424.151.622.657.220.857.820.559.12058.619.959.318.665.818.568.617.864.817.265.116.861.116.459.516.560.816.555.116.452.316.656.316.552.616.448.816.249.916.155.329.7741.331.7median 17.8median 57.22.55.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACHHonor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理。具有良好电池寿命的联想笔记本电脑

能源消耗

强大的组件，高分辨率的液晶面板--这听起来像是一个高功耗的配方。的确，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH确实比内部结构更节俭的竞争对手消耗更多的电力。

负载下的差异尤其引人注目。最大消耗为128瓦--基本在135瓦电源适配器的范围内。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.076 / 0.241 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.7 / 9.3 / 11 Watt
Load midlight 83.4 / 128.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00		HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G, IPS, 3200x2000, 15.60		Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
R5 4600H, Vega 6, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10		Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
15%
19%
9%
35%
39%
-3%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
5.7
5
12%
4.9
14%
6
-5%
4.2
26%
3
47%
4.96 ?(2 - 13, n=23)
13%
7.29 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=94, last 2 years)
-28%
Idle Average *
9.3
9
3%
7.9
15%
9
3%
8.4
10%
6.4
31%
8.61 ?(5.3 - 15.7, n=23)
7%
11.7 ?(4.6 - 43, n=94, last 2 years)
-26%
Idle Maximum *
11
9.4
15%
14.2
-29%
12
-9%
9.7
12%
7.9
28%
14.8 ?(8.9 - 30.6, n=23)
-35%
14.5 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=94, last 2 years)
-32%
Load Average *
83.4
71
15%
64.3
23%
74
11%
39.5
53%
59
29%
81.7 ?(57 - 128, n=23)
2%
77.7 ?(14.3 - 147, n=93, last 2 years)
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
94.4
72.4
23%
55.6
41%
70.7
25%
39.1
59%
48
49%
Load Maximum *
128.7
99
23%
65.4
49%
91
29%
67.1
48%
68
47%
131.9 ?(80 - 192.2, n=23)
-2%
120.2 ?(47.7 - 247, n=93, last 2 years)
7%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / Stress test

91.8101.8111.8121.8Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø94.4 (91.8-97.7)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø121.6 (114-130)

电池寿命

充电时间：78分钟
充电时间：78分钟

在我们对多媒体笔记本电脑的比较中，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的电池容量最大；内部电池可容纳75瓦特小时。在Wi-Fi测试中，显示亮度为150cd/m²的电池寿命令人印象深刻，因为联想笔记本电脑实现了超过12小时。不过，当你增加显示亮度时，你应该小心--在Wi-Fi测试中，在全亮度下，显示亮度会急剧下降到7小时左右。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 92)
12h 34min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 92)
7h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 41min
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 75 Wh		Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450, 75 Wh		HP Pavilion 15-eg
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 41 Wh		Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450, 70 Wh		Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD)
R5 4600H, Vega 6, 56 Wh		Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350, 50 Wh		Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-15%
-37%
-38%
-14%
-33%
-5%
H.264
623
625
0%
323
-48%
633
2%
698 ?(319 - 1481, n=51, last 2 years)
12%
WiFi v1.3
754
543
-28%
396
-47%
493
-35%
619
-18%
504
-33%
569 ?(274 - 1204, n=93, last 2 years)
-25%
Load
101
84
-17%
74
-27%
70
-31%
74
-27%
97.6 ?(39 - 215, n=74, last 2 years)
-3%

Pros

+ 大型16:10液晶显示器，120赫兹，指标良好
+ 由于采用了AMD Ryzen 5000 CPU和GeForce GPU，性能强劲。
+ 电池寿命长
+ 端口配置包括SD读卡器
+ 相对实惠

Cons

- 扬声器不佳
- 负载下的冷却声音很大
- 焊接的RAM
- 有限的Realtek Wi-Fi
- 没有Thunderbolt
- DPC延迟

结论：联想IdeaPad看起来不错，但声音不是很好。

在审查中。联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH，提供的是
在审查中。联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH，提供的是

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH证明了16:10格式不再限于高端笔记本电脑。16英寸显示器具有高WQXGA分辨率、良好的质量和快速的响应时间，这可能是这款多媒体笔记本电脑的核心，它使其成为游戏以及观看电影的理想选择。

诚然，游戏特别需要性能--IdeaPad也可以通过其AMD Ryzen和NvidiaGeForce 组件提供这种性能。在这种情况下很重要。这里测试的AMD型号明显比英特尔变体，即联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU 。然而，更高的性能也有一个代价。在英特尔型号中并不安静的风扇，在这里显然在负载下更加响亮；以至于它们可以被描述为恼人的。作为回报，AMD版本的运行温度较低，电池寿命也更好。

完全焊接的内存对于这样一台大型笔记本电脑来说是不寻常的。而糟糕的内部扬声器对于多媒体笔记本电脑来说也是不寻常的--很明显，联想在这里走了一些弯路，使得外部解决方案成为必须。

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH与Ryzen 5000 CPU、16:10长宽比和可负担的价格的组合形成了一个伟大的共生体。

这是联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的最大弱点，否则它显示了预算类别中好的多媒体笔记本电脑应该是什么样子。特别是由于非常好的显示屏，但也因为其性能，我们给它一个推荐。

另一个选择是RedmiBook Pro 15，它有很好的3:2液晶屏，但它只能从中国的网上商店购买。 Honor MagicBook Pro也与联想笔记本电脑类似，但它配备的是16:9格式的16英寸液晶显示器--这在观看电影时可能是一个优势，但在办公应用和浏览网页时则是一个缺点。

价格和可用性

在撰写本文时，联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH在制造商的网上商店被列为 "即将推出"。.另外，你也可以等待它在Amazon或newegg，例如。

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH - 08/30/2021 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 78%
Weight
63 / 20-72 → 83%
Battery
88 / 95 → 92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
84 / 90 → 93%
Application Performance
93 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
83 / 95 → 87%
Audio
58%
Camera
25 / 85 → 30%
Average
76%
86%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH回顾。带有120赫兹大屏幕的Ryzen 5000笔记本电脑
Benjamin Herzig, 2021-09- 5 (Update: 2021-09- 5)