Notebookcheck

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH回顾。带有120赫兹大屏幕的Ryzen 5000笔记本电脑

Ryzen和16:10的大众化。 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH可能是16:10显示屏和AMD处理器的趋势相结合的结果。这款多媒体笔记本电脑以其不太宽的大尺寸、高分辨率120赫兹液晶显示器和快速的Ryzen 5000H CPU脱颖而出。
Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Benjamin Herzig (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Cezanne (Zen 3) Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

传统上,15英寸显示屏的笔记本电脑一直是消费领域最受欢迎的机型。大显示屏为文件、游戏和多媒体内容提供了大量空间;同时,大尺寸笔记本电脑往往有可能更强大。然而,2021年出现了一个新的趋势。连同从16:9到16:10的转变,显示屏尺寸从15.6英寸增加到16英寸。这方面的一个例子是联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH。

这并不是联想笔记本电脑采用的唯一趋势。自Ryzen 4000系列发布以来,AMD处理器在笔记本电脑市场上掀起了热潮,而联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH采用了最新的Zen 3处理器--型号中的 "ACH "代表 "AMD Cezanne-H"。凭借强大的H处理器和NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650,这款联想笔记本电脑瞄准了多媒体市场。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH (IdeaPad 5 Pro Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 57 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 4096 MB, Core: 1155 MHz, Memory: 1250 MHz, 30 W TDP, TU117, 457.56, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-3200, on-board, dual-channel
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, IPS LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280, NVMe PCIe 3.0, 476 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC3287
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: 4-in-1 SD
Networking
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.5 x 356 x 251
Battery
75 Wh Lithium-Ion
Camera
Webcam: 720p w/IR
Additional features
Speakers: 2-watt stereo, Keyboard: six-row chiclet with numpad, Keyboard Light: yes, 135-watt slim tip charger, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.977 kg, Power Supply: 389 g
Price
950 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
09/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
R7 5800H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2 kg17.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
81 %
07/2021
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
1.7 kg17.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
i7-11370H, GeForce MX450
1.7 kg16 mm15.60"3200x2000
85 %
09/2020
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
R5 4600H, Vega 6
1.7 kg16.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
83 %
12/2020
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350
1.8 kg16.1 mm15.60"1920x1080

外壳。联想IdeaPad的深色铝壳

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH

在设计方面,联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH与联想IdeaPad系列的许多其他笔记本电脑相比并不突出。摄像头区域有轻微的反向凹槽,方便打开盖子,宽大的铰链,以及掌托右边缘垂直排列的联想标志--这是现代联想笔记本电脑的典型设计特征。外壳完全采用 "风暴灰 "的深灰色,键盘的颜色也与之匹配。唯一的颜色对比是由联想标志周围的金属边框提供的,除了触摸板左边的贴纸巡游。总而言之,这是一个现代、简约的设计。

铝的使用确保了高质量的感觉;塑料只出现在显示屏边框和铰链的区域。不过,这不是CNC加工的铝的事实在显示屏区域是很明显的。虽然基本单元对扭转有很强的抵抗力,但屏幕可以被扭转一下。另一方面,盖子对施加在屏幕背面的压力反应良好,因为对显示屏没有明显的影响。键盘和掌托不能被压住,联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的做工毫无瑕疵。

屏幕可以用一只手打开,但只能达到160度的打开角度。在摇晃的环境中,显示屏会有一些晃动,这看起来不是很精致,但也不是很夸张。

凭借16:10格式的16英寸显示屏,联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH比竞争对手更长,但换来的宽度却略显不足--尤其是与Honor MagicBook Pro 16 。在我们比较的多媒体笔记本电脑中,联想笔记本电脑的重量也是最重的。

Size comparison

369 mm 234 mm 16.9 mm 1.7 kg360.2 mm 234 mm 17.9 mm 1.7 kg359.8 mm 233.8 mm 16.1 mm 1.8 kg356 mm 251 mm 17.5 mm 2 kg351 mm 242 mm 16 mm 1.7 kg

连接性。带SD读卡器的联想笔记本电脑

有趣的是,联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH所选择的GPU配置在涉及到端口时产生了差异。带有专用GPU的变体,如我们的测试设备,在左侧有一个专有的细长充电端口。没有Nvidia图形芯片的型号在其位置上有一个额外的USB-C端口。联想笔记本电脑也可以通过这里的USB-C端口充电。

这些连接符合我们对多媒体笔记本电脑的期望,我们特别喜欢全尺寸SD读卡器和HDMI端口。遗憾的是,不支持Thunderbolt,但这是由于使用的是AMD平台。

左边:超薄充电端口,HDMI 2.0,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2,3.5毫米音频插孔
左边:超薄充电端口,HDMI 2.0,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2,3.5毫米音频插孔
右边。SD读卡器,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1
右边。SD读卡器,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1

SD卡阅读器

没有一个对比的笔记本电脑有全尺寸的SD卡读卡器。虽然联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的读卡器不能完全容纳卡片,但它的存在就是一个很大的优势--尽管联想笔记本电脑的读卡器只能提供平均速度。

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.1 - 224, n=62, last 2 years)
78.5 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
  (AV PRO V60)
76.13 MB/s ∼97%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
66.7 MB/s ∼85% -12%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25 MB/s ∼32% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.2 - 217, n=62, last 2 years)
88.7 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
  (AV PRO V60)
87.67 MB/s ∼99%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77.78 MB/s ∼88% -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25.9 MB/s ∼29% -70%

沟通

尽管联想可以宣传其IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH带有 "Wi-Fi 6",但在现实中并没有留下多少。安装在联想笔记本电脑中的Realtek 2x2模块令人失望,传输速率低,远远落后于目前的英特尔解决方案。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 (686min - 1498max) MBit/s ∼100% +77%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1197 (1057min - 1282max) MBit/s ∼84% +49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (52 - 1563, n=79, last 2 years)
981 MBit/s ∼69% +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
804 (670min - 867max) MBit/s ∼57%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (561 - 928, n=12)
790 MBit/s ∼56% -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
670 (647min - 687max) MBit/s ∼47% -17%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
646 (548min - 695max) MBit/s ∼45% -20%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1434 (1199min - 1500max) MBit/s ∼100% +122%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1343 (650min - 1573max) MBit/s ∼94% +108%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 1548, n=79, last 2 years)
1055 MBit/s ∼74% +63%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
902 (860min - 921max) MBit/s ∼63% +40%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (621 - 855, n=12)
762 MBit/s ∼53% +18%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
671 (639min - 690max) MBit/s ∼47% +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
646 (604min - 699max) MBit/s ∼45%
604649694739784829647638635635604616679630628627644650656662628671649665699621618638636670695629628642639671647638635635604616679630628627644650656662628671649665699621618638636670695629628642639671837675867850834860867825806820670861812759798847836672768745800745834787817855773823844839Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø645 (604-699)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (670-867)

网络摄像头

放在联想IdeaPad 5 Pro液晶显示器上方的720p网络摄像头提供低于平均水平的图像质量,这是大多数笔记本电脑的典型缺陷。然而,它足以进行视频通话,至少在良好的光线下。

ColorChecker
18.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
15 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH: 9.15 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 18.79 ∆E

辅料

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的包装只包含一个135瓦的电源适配器,有一个细长的接头。没有包括其他配件。

维护

一共有9颗TX5螺丝和一些夹子将底盖固定在一起。螺丝没有留在箱子里,所以你必须小心不要把它们弄丢。最好是用一个塑料铲子工具来松开夹子,但信用卡或拨浪鼓也可以做到这一点。

令我们失望的是,我们在联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的内部只发现了一些可升级的组件。用户可以很容易地升级M.2-2280固态硬盘和M.2-2230 Wi-Fi模块,但内存是完全焊接的。其他维护选项包括更换内部电池和清洁冷却系统。

内部视图 - 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
内部视图 - 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH

担保

对于像联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH这样的消费类笔记本电脑来说,24个月的带入保修期是标准的。有趣的是,联想还为这一型号的产品提供了额外费用的延长保修期,最大可能是48个月的现场服务。

平均输入设备。联想笔记本电脑

键盘

像绝大多数这个尺寸的联想笔记本电脑一样,联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH也有一个数字键盘。因此,键盘向左偏移了一些。此外,在没有数字键盘的情况下,一些按键,如回车键,也许可以更宽一点。对于输入大量数字的用户来说,数字键盘可能是非常有用的。不过,如果能选择没有数字键盘的联想笔记本电脑,那就更理想了。

两段式背光键盘及其圆形的按键提供了良好的打字体验。联想IdeaPad并不是最顶级的,键盘当然也不能与联想ThinkPad相提并论,但你仍然可以毫无问题地输入较长的文字。压力点可以更明确一些,行程也相当短,这在现在很常见。

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的键盘区域
联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的键盘区域

触摸板

一个大的塑料触摸板作为唯一的鼠标替代品。12 x 7.5厘米,比联想ThinkPad系列的触摸板要大,比如说。它是一个具有经典机械结构的触摸板,这意味着它只能在下部区域进行点击。

在软件实现方面,没有什么可抱怨的。触摸板对WindowsPrecision 驱动程序的手势反应完美,而且可以准确地控制鼠标指针。我们对硬件本身没有特别深刻的印象;塑料表面感觉质量不高,点击机制也是如此。这是一个好的触摸板,但显然不是优质硬件。

120赫兹的16:10显示屏是联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的亮点。

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的子像素矩阵
联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的子像素矩阵
轻微的背光出血(在此以强化的方式显示)。
轻微的背光出血(在此以强化的方式显示)。

如果你购买联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH,你不需要太担心选择哪种显示屏。这款联想笔记本电脑只提供16英寸WQXGA液晶显示器(2560x1600)。这块IPS显示屏是哑光的,应该能提供350cd/m²的亮度,而且是一块非触摸液晶屏。尽管如此,还是有两种LCD选择,因为联想为AMD IdeaPad提供了60 Hz面板以及120 Hz显示器。否则,关键规格是相同的。

我们的测试设备配备了120赫兹的变体--在日常使用中,当你在桌面上滚动或拖动窗口时,这是很明显的,因为有额外的平滑度,而且你在游戏中也受益于加倍的刷新率。恰当的是,该显示器具有快速的响应时间。联想笔记本电脑的显示屏在其他方面也很有说服力。广告中的亮度值超过了约25cd/m²,因为显示器发出了约375cd/m²的亮度。

383
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 395 cd/m² Average: 375.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.39 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 394 cd/m²
Contrast: 1234:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
73.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Chi Mei CMN1523, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
IPS, 3200x2000, 15.60
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
N161HCA-EA3, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Panda LM156LF-5L04, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-38%
-5%
-13%
-44%
Display P3 Coverage
71
42.9
-40%
66.73
-6%
67.5
-5%
39.01
-45%
sRGB Coverage
99
64
-35%
96.27
-3%
69.74
-30%
58.55
-41%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
73.3
44.4
-39%
68.5
-7%
69.74
-5%
40.33
-45%
Response Times
-67%
-143%
-106%
-170%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.4 (6.4, 10)
22.8 (10, 12.8)
-39%
34.8 (17.2, 17.6)
-112%
37.6 (18.8, 18.8)
-129%
38 (19, 19)
-132%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
23.6 (13.6, 10)
-168%
24 (12.4, 11.6)
-173%
25.6 (14, 11.6)
-191%
27 (15, 12)
-207%
PWM Frequency
24940 (50)
26320 (43)
6%
25250 (30)
1%
Screen
-67%
-47%
33%
-77%
Brightness middle
395
294.3
-25%
312
-21%
337
-15%
287
-27%
Brightness
375
251
-33%
298
-21%
312
-17%
261
-30%
Brightness Distribution
90
76
-16%
87
-3%
89
-1%
84
-7%
Black Level *
0.32
0.26
19%
0.18
44%
0.2
37%
0.51
-59%
Contrast
1234
1132
-8%
1733
40%
1685
37%
563
-54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
4.08
-57%
5.39
-107%
0.8
69%
4.72
-82%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.4
19.49
-261%
9.95
-84%
1.1
80%
17.94
-232%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.1
3.7
-236%
3.15
-186%
0.7
36%
3.74
-240%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
3
12%
6.3
-85%
1
71%
2.2
35%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.21 100%
2.192 100%
2.2 100%
2.51 88%
CCT
6140 106%
6616 98%
7473 87%
6538 99%
6758 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
69
63.8
37
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
99.5
58
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-57% / -61%
-65% / -52%
-29% / -4%
-97% / -83%

* ... smaller is better

色彩再现
色彩再现
灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
色彩再现(已校准
色彩再现(已校准
灰度(已校准)
灰度(已校准)
饱和度(已校准
饱和度(已校准

根据我们用CalMan软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2色度计的测量,联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的色彩还原有点太出格。用色度计和X-Rite i1Profiler软件进行校准,能够消除色差,使色彩再现接近理想。在对比度方面还有一些改进的余地,因为它只配得上 "好 "的分数,而不是 "非常好 "的分数,比例为1234:1。

色彩空间的覆盖率也很好。由于几乎完全覆盖了 "小 "sRGB色彩空间,在日常使用中,大多数颜色都能正确显示,而且可以进行简单的图像编辑。

sRGB: 99%
sRGB: 99%
AdobeRGB: 73.3%
AdobeRGB: 73.3%
DCI-P3: 71%
DCI-P3: 71%
室外(阳光充足,在阴凉处
室外(阳光充足,在阴凉处

从200cd/m²开始,你可以说一个显示器最低限度地适合于户外使用。由于这里安装的面板更进一步,达到375cd/m²,同时具有哑光表面,所以联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH可以在户外使用而没有问题。如果可能的话,你应该避免将面板暴露在阳光直射下。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.4 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 24940 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 24940 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 24940 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15315 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

作为IPS型面板的典型代表,可视角度的稳定性是无懈可击的。

使用AMD Cezanne-H和Nvidia Turing的强大性能

联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH有三种不同的处理器:AMD Ryzen 5 5600HRyzen 7 5800H Ryzen 9 5900HX 。在某些配置中,联想没有为这些强大的AMD CPU提供dGPU;因此,AMD Radeon iGPU作为图形芯片--但在大多数情况下,dGPU很可能已经安装,要么是NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650RTX 3050.所有配置中的DDR4-3200内存都是焊接的,有8、16和32GB内存的变种。一块M.2-2280固态硬盘被用作大容量存储设备。

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z AMD Radeon
GPU-Z AMD Radeon
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z缓存
CPU-Z缓存
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z内存

处理器

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H是Cezanne H系列的Zen 3处理器,具有八个核心和16个线程。作为H系列CPU,该处理器的典型TDP为45瓦,最大时钟速度为4.4GHz(基础时钟速度为3.2GHz)。在我们的CPU基准测试文章 ,你可以将Ryzen处理器与当前其他处理芯片进行比较。

该处理器的最大消耗为57瓦,但这只是几秒钟的情况。从长远来看,AMD Ryzen处理器的消耗量稳定在35瓦。有了这些速率,联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH显然是测试领域中最快的多媒体笔记本电脑,至少当所有核心都处于负载状态时。如果只有一个核心被加载,采用英特尔CPU的笔记本电脑就有优势。

我们注意到CPU的性能在电池供电时有一个限制。在没有连接电源适配器的情况下,CPU的性能大约降低了14%。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

618.8718.8818.8918.81018.81118.81218.81318.81418.81518.81618.81718.81818.81918.81971.511952.461943.541937.141946.571952.461951.891953.321962.031956.951931.91954.271941.561961.461959.731942.61942.411929.761938.641936.761930.871930.61923.821930.61941.65733.12689.12693.79686.52683.6699.84692.47700.43695.88699.68698.71698.32697.39635.61618.81654.23699.09693.22693.79694.94693.75703.14696.06726.89759.23758.38758.32755.43758.97762.14758.87757.43758.22756.22749.75755.2758.98758.31760.99759.01753.34756.97750.3758.09760.85756.3756.09758.11758.32757.21048.55809.65765.3910.77997.71992.51966.25936.24935.61933.75925.84955.11921.09919.79929.56931.53928.14945.54908.37936.79892.14944.06908.86927.84916.72959.72781.19788.08787.03783.61784.54785.48786.61785.28786.98787.39785.22783.28785.31787.42783.65787.14785.45781.11782.52782.76785.82784.42783.99786.86917.33840.46843.4848.75851.77855.41843.92839.6838.79836.45847.31840.3849843.94842.39845.45845.06850.23852.37852.44846.42842845.02850.67852.914201396.941398.51397.621394.851381.51356.621353.181347.071346.5713581346.761348.391348.661342.691351.261353.271348.941348.81343.181347.441342.821348.121348.751343.72922.13762.94781.25766.52782.12750777.76739.37725.41742.4710.18715.13720.92719.76716.28715.72721.1715.7712.42718.8714.57715.35717.53714.99715.88711.26719.4715.74717.31716.92711.17714.9715.73715.17718.51714.68716.23717.18718.24714.69990.11983.55971.56953.22946.07948.7952.47950.59956.41953.33955.98921.15950.95951.93950.55955.22951.86952.02950.1957.72950.91953.49954.56956.48954.52956.32953.95956.69955.34954.2951.04952.36949.92950.43952.06955.77954.81951.86955.27954.54Tooltip
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1945 (1923.82-1971.51)
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø725 (618.81-762.14)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Variable PL1 : Ø928 (765.3-1048.55)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; Pl1 @ 25W: Ø792 (781.11-959.72)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 Intel Core i7-11370H; PL1 fixed @ 28W: Ø849 (836.45-917.33)
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H AMD Ryzen 5 4600H: Ø1361 (1342.69-1420)
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø731 (710.18-922.13)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (921.15-990.11)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1529 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1512 Points ∼99% +9%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1495 Points ∼98% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1431 Points ∼94% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1294 - 1441, n=14)
1408 Points ∼92% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1386 Points ∼91%
Average of class Multimedia
  (980 - 1534, n=45, last 2 years)
1324 Points ∼87% -4%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (10097 - 13214, n=14)
12181 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11727 Points ∼96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3121 - 13205, n=51, last 2 years)
6685 Points ∼55% -43%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
6465 Points ∼53% -45%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5639 Points ∼46% -52%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5344 (4894.88min - 5344.23max) Points ∼44% -54%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5156 Points ∼42% -56%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4947 (4868.64min - 4947.48max) Points ∼41% -58%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
589 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
585 Points ∼99% +8%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
575 Points ∼98% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (502 - 559, n=15)
549 Points ∼93% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
548 Points ∼93% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
542 Points ∼92%
Average of class Multimedia
  (311 - 595, n=90, last 2 years)
483 Points ∼82% -11%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
452 Points ∼77% -17%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (4172 - 5020, n=16)
4698 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4575 Points ∼97%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3234 Points ∼69% -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
2382 Points ∼51% -48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (727 - 5128, n=91, last 2 years)
2289 Points ∼49% -50%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
2152 Points ∼46% -53%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2001 Points ∼43% -56%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1908 Points ∼41% -58%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
231 Points ∼99% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (209 - 234, n=14)
228 Points ∼98% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
224 Points ∼96%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
221 Points ∼95% -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
220 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (126 - 240, n=91, last 2 years)
189 Points ∼81% -16%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
176 Points ∼76% -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
176 Points ∼76% -21%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1920 - 2119, n=14)
2020 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1972 (1923.82min - 1971.51max) Points ∼98%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1420 (1342.69min - 1420max) Points ∼70% -28%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1049 (765.3min - 1048.55max) Points ∼52% -47%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
960 (781.11min - 959.72max) Points ∼48% -51%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
917 (836.45min - 917.33max) Points ∼45% -53%
Average of class Multimedia
  (334 - 2154, n=105, last 2 years)
998 Points ∼49% -49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
990 Points ∼49% -50%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
922 Points ∼46% -53%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
762 (618.81min - 762.14max) Points ∼38% -61%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
603 Seconds * ∼100% -132%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
578 Seconds * ∼96% -122%
Average of class Multimedia
  (233 - 1439, n=78, last 2 years)
549 Seconds * ∼91% -111%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
542 Seconds * ∼90% -108%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
538 Seconds * ∼89% -107%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
356 Seconds * ∼59% -37%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
260 Seconds * ∼43%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (237 - 268, n=14)
252 Seconds * ∼42% +3%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5038 - 5632, n=14)
5470 MIPS ∼100% +3%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5416 MIPS ∼99% +2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5411 MIPS ∼99% +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5396 MIPS ∼99% +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5292 MIPS ∼97%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4947 MIPS ∼90% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3406 - 5777, n=77, last 2 years)
4920 MIPS ∼90% -7%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4334 MIPS ∼79% -18%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (52444 - 57284, n=14)
54867 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
52444 MIPS ∼96%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
38185 MIPS ∼70% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8984 - 59653, n=77, last 2 years)
28483 MIPS ∼52% -46%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
25382 MIPS ∼46% -52%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
25353 MIPS ∼46% -52%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
23940 MIPS ∼44% -54%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22655 MIPS ∼41% -57%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
1574 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1557 Points ∼99% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1447 Points ∼92% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1347 - 1481, n=13)
1437 Points ∼91% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1431 Points ∼91%
Average of class Multimedia
  (813 - 1645, n=73, last 2 years)
1307 Points ∼83% -9%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1117 Points ∼71% -22%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (7438 - 8244, n=13)
7743 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7438 Points ∼96%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
6080 Points ∼79% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1604 - 9050, n=73, last 2 years)
5277 Points ∼68% -29%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
5214 Points ∼67% -30%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5055 Points ∼65% -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4905 Points ∼63% -34%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (13.4 - 16.1, n=14)
14.8 fps ∼100% +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13.8 fps ∼93%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.79 fps ∼66% -29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 15.9, n=75, last 2 years)
7.62 fps ∼51% -45%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.08 fps ∼48% -49%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
6.91 fps ∼47% -50%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.59 fps ∼45% -52%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.21 fps ∼42% -55%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47.4 - 113, n=14)
69.2 s * ∼100% -46%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
62.5 s * ∼90% -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.5 - 99.2, n=76, last 2 years)
55 s * ∼79% -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
52.4 s * ∼76% -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
47.4 s * ∼68%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
47.3 s * ∼68% -0%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * ∼66% +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
44.2 s * ∼64% +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4998 - 1.002, n=76, last 2 years)
0.63 sec * ∼100% -16%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.627 sec * ∼100% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.604 sec * ∼96% -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.568 sec * ∼90% -4%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.56 sec * ∼89% -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.552 sec * ∼88% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.544 sec * ∼86%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (0.512 - 0.559, n=13)
0.527 sec * ∼84% +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1972 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
160 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
224 Points
Help

系统性能

对于拥有这些组件的笔记本电脑,PCMark中的系统性能略低于平均水平。然而,这足以让该笔记本电脑在测试领域中名列前茅。说到联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH在日常使用中的系统性能,绝对没有什么可抱怨的。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (5862 - 6217, n=2)
6040 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
5862 Points ∼97%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5814 Points ∼96% -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5625 Points ∼93% -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5333 Points ∼88% -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5306 Points ∼88% -9%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5001 Points ∼83% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3028 - 6725, n=84, last 2 years)
4854 Points ∼80% -17%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (10001 - 10031, n=2)
10016 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10001 Points ∼100%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9833 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6441 - 10539, n=83, last 2 years)
8999 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8931 Points ∼89% -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8930 Points ∼89% -11%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8888 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
8568 Points ∼86% -14%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
9662 Points ∼100% +18%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9292 Points ∼96% +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (8218 - 9225, n=2)
8722 Points ∼90% +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8554 Points ∼89% +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8519 Points ∼88% +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8218 Points ∼85%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5448 - 9662, n=83, last 2 years)
7314 Points ∼76% -11%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7209 Points ∼75% -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (6650 - 7048, n=2)
6849 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6650 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
GeForce MX450, i7-11370H, Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
5880 Points ∼86% -12%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
5839 Points ∼85% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5388 Points ∼79% -19%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
GeForce MX350, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5330 Points ∼78% -20%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5299 Points ∼77% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2148 - 9415, n=83, last 2 years)
4833 Points ∼71% -27%
PCMark 10 Score
5862 points
Help

DPC延迟

不幸的是,联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH在高DPC延迟上挣扎。一个网络驱动程序显然是这里的罪魁祸首。

延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
654.8 μs * ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
628.7 μs * ∼96% +4%

* ... smaller is better

储存

美光公司的512GB M.2-2280固态硬盘被用作该模型的大容量存储设备。这是一款快速的NVMe PCIe 3.0固态硬盘,当涉及到4K写入时有一些小的弱点。然而,这在日常使用中不太可能被注意到。

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Toshiba KBG40ZNV512G
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Average Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
 
AS SSD
7%
-46%
42%
-3%
-7%
Seq Read
2643
2030.38
-23%
1972.39
-25%
2749
4%
1753.96
-34%
2240 (1362 - 2960, n=5)
-15%
Seq Write
1510.38
1003.25
-34%
980.6
-35%
2348
55%
1566.75
4%
1664 (1389 - 2586, n=5)
10%
4K Read
42.86
46.74
9%
55.85
30%
44.22
3%
52.97
24%
45.4 (38.4 - 49.8, n=5)
6%
4K Write
85.51
164.16
92%
133.53
56%
140.48
64%
167.86
96%
102 (85.5 - 121, n=5)
19%
4K-64 Read
767.72
1097.88
43%
1277.06
66%
1449.71
89%
586.35
-24%
735 (371 - 855, n=5)
-4%
4K-64 Write
1983.22
890.98
-55%
313.94
-84%
2345.58
18%
857.61
-57%
1670 (1054 - 2015, n=5)
-16%
Access Time Read *
0.103
0.053
49%
0.15
-46%
0.079
23%
0.097
6%
0.0634 (0.042 - 0.103, n=5)
38%
Access Time Write *
0.101
0.062
39%
0.513
-408%
0.027
73%
0.038
62%
0.1934 (0.094 - 0.365, n=5)
-91%
Score Read
1075
1348
25%
1530
42%
1769
65%
815
-24%
1004 (545 - 1197, n=5)
-7%
Score Write
2220
1155
-48%
546
-75%
2721
23%
1182
-47%
1939 (1319 - 2370, n=5)
-13%
Score Total
3797
3149
-17%
2819
-26%
5376
42%
2421
-36%
3439 (2160 - 4170, n=5)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Sequential Read: 2643MB/s
Sequential Write: 1510.38MB/s
4K Read: 42.86MB/s
4K Write: 85.51MB/s
4K-64 Read: 767.72MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1983.22MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.103ms
Access Time Write: 0.101ms
Score Read: 1075Points
Score Write: 2220Points
Score Total: 3797Points

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

295431192954.012954.012962.82965.312965.732976.492981.012983.312984.152984.362989.813011.153037.943054.893215.633220.663221.073221.493222.93223.113224.373247.233247.443247.453249.333249.963250.173250.173250.173250.383250.383250.59325132513251325132513251.423251.633251.843252.053252.053252.053252.053252.263252.263252.473252.683253.13254.37Tooltip
: Ø3173 (2954.01-3254.37)

图形卡

GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650
GPU-Z NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650

NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650是 "图灵 "一代中最不强大的GTX芯片。在这种情况下,它配备了4GB的专用GDDR6内存,896个着色器单元的最大时钟速度为1,155 MHz。使用我们的GPU基准测试表 ,可以与其他图形芯片进行比较。

联想允许GTX消耗大约30瓦的功率。从这个角度来看,较新的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 ,联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH中也有,其TGP(总图形功率)据说是35瓦。为了显示3050的潜力,我们在比较中包括了宏碁Nitro 5;它的速度快48%至61%。

与所有GTX 1650笔记本电脑的平均结果相比,联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH的表现低于平均水平。它落后于平均水平约12%。尽管如此,这足以在经济实惠的多媒体笔记本电脑中名列前茅。联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU,配备英特尔Tiger Lake CPU和GeForce MX450 GPU,根据3DMark测试,速度慢16%至33%。

当电源适配器没有插入时,GPU性能下降了约19%。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11300H
16967 Points ∼100% +48%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (10885 - 13575, n=28)
12860 Points ∼76% +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11470 Points ∼68%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
9580 Points ∼56% -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1365 - 31866, n=82, last 2 years)
9446 Points ∼56% -18%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
8204 Points ∼48% -28%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
7983 Points ∼47% -30%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6332 Points ∼37% -45%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4589 Points ∼27% -60%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11300H
12736 Points ∼100% +54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (7741 - 9810, n=30)
9220 Points ∼72% +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8287 Points ∼65%
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 23674, n=90, last 2 years)
6746 Points ∼53% -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
5573 Points ∼44% -33%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4753 Points ∼37% -43%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-11370H
4435 Points ∼35% -46%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4364 Points ∼34% -47%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3051 Points ∼24% -63%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-11300H
4888 Points ∼100% +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (2909 - 3700, n=29)
3445 Points ∼70% +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
3038 Points ∼62%
Average of class Multimedia
  (300 - 9323, n=77, last 2 years)
2424 Points ∼50% -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
2300 Points ∼47% -24%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1945 Points ∼40% -36%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1338 Points ∼27% -56%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
903 Points ∼18% -70%
3DMark 11 Performance
11801 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7763 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
3362 points
Help

游戏性能

Nvidia GTX 1650使联想笔记本电脑能够以全高清显示现代游戏,甚至在非常高的细节水平上。然而,这个GPU并不足以应付4K游戏或VR,但休闲游戏玩家和拥有全高清显示器的用户在这里肯定会得到很好的服务。

即使在连续的负载下,该图形芯片也能提供其性能,没有大的波动。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
84.5 (72min) fps ∼100% +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (53.6 - 70.4, n=27)
62.5 fps ∼74% +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
58 (48min - 63max) fps ∼69%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.1 - 170, n=69, last 2 years)
51.6 fps ∼61% -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
42.8 (12.2min, 16.6P0.1, 29.7P1 - 169max) fps ∼51% -26%
HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
39.7 (36min - 45max) fps ∼47% -32%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
34 fps ∼40% -41%
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350
27 fps ∼32% -53%
Honor MagicBook Pro 4600H
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
18.1 fps ∼21% -69%

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

111621263136414632313031313131313031313131313031313131303132313031313130313131313131313031313130313131303131313132313132313131313031313132303131303131313031313130313130313131313031313131313130313131313131303131313031313131303131313131313130313130313131303131313130313131313031313031313130313031313131303231313031313031313031313031303131303131303130313130313031313031303131303131303131313131323131313031313031303031313030313031303031303130313031303031313130313130313132313030303130303130303130303130303130313030303130303031303031313031303130303130303130303030313030303031303030313030313030303131313031313130303030303130303030313030303030303030303030313031303030313031313031303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302930303130303030303030303030313031303130303030303030293030303030303030303029303030293030302930303029303029303029303029302930302930293030293030302930293030303029302930302930302930302930302930302931303029293029302930292930293029302929302930302930293029302930292930292930292930292930293029293029293029292930292929302929293029292930303030292929292930292930293029302929293029293029292930292930292929302929293029292930292930293129293029292930293029303029303030292930292930292929293029292929302929292929293029292930293029293029292930303029292930292929293029292930292929302929292930292930283029293029292929302929293029293029293030292930292929302929302929293029293029292930292930292929302930303030292929302929302929302929293029302929302930293030303030303029302930293029293029302930293029303029302930293030303030303030303030302930293029302930293030302930302930303130293029302930302930303030293030303030303030302930303030313030303130303031303131313031313030303130303030303031303030303030303030303130293031303131303131303031303030303130303131313030303031303030313030303030313030313031303030313030313030303031303030313030303130303130303030303031303030303130303030313132302930313030303031303030303131303131313130303130303030313030303130303031313130303030303030313030303031303030313031303031303130313031303030313030313030303131313031303031303130313131313031303031313032313130313030313031303130313031303130313031303130313031313131313131313130303131303131303130313132313030313030313031303031303131303130313130313031303131303131303131303130313130313031313130313131303131303131313031313031313130313131313031313131313131313131313131313031313131313131303131313131313131323132303131313131313131313131313132313130313132313131313131313131313131313131313131323131313131323131323132323231323231313131323131313231313131313231313132313131323132313131323131323132313132313131313231323132323132323232313231323131323131323231323131323132313132323232323131323131323132313231323132313231323232313132323132323232313232313231323232323232323232323132313232313231323231323231323231323231323231323231333233313231323132313231323231323132313231323132313232323332323232323132323231323233323131323132313231323132313232313231323132313231323231323132323132313232313232323231323233323232323232313332323131323132323132313232313132313232313232313132313231323131323132313231323132313231323231323131323231323132313232313232313231323132313132313231313231323131323232323232323131323131323131323131323232323031323131313231323131313132313132313132313131313231313132313131323131313231313132313132313132313131323132313132323132313231313231313132313131313231313131323131313132313131313231313132313132313132313131323131313231313132313132313232313131313231313131313132313131323131313231313131323232313131313131323131323131313227262726262726262726262626272626272626272626272626272626272627262726262726262726262726262726262626262627262627262626272626262627262627262627262726262627262726262726262627